Positive Reinforcement - The Big Bang Theory
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 ноя 2024
- This is from The Big Bang Theory. This clip was meant to show positive reinforcement. All credit goes to them. If you would like to see the whole episode, it's the third episode of season 3, entitled "The Gothowitz Deviation".
I feel like every psychology teacher made their student come here lol
trueeeeeeeeeeeeee
University of Sydney checking in
Texas A&M San Antonio, Texas checking also lol
lol exactly and here i am
My teacher just showed me yesterday, lmfao
"Very good.. Chocolate..?"
I died laughing 😂😂😂
Penny is so damn unmeasurably dumb that she couldn't figure out wthell was Sheldon doing!!!
😂😂😂😂
physiologically unlikely
1:22
Well chocolate isn't really positive snack.
Very good chocolate i died laughing
Why are you here?
1- College Level Psych (Psych 101?)
2- AP Psychology
3- Other Psychology class/mentoring/tutoring
4- You’re a teacher
5- You didn’t realize everyone used this video to explain positive punishment, and just like the show.
number 5 but it's cool learning all this.
5
IB Psychology
5. But I do have a degree in social sciences.
4!!
That silent ‘chocolate ‘ omg 😂😂😂
I noticed that.
*Laughing hopeless*
🤣🤣🤣
That silent chocolate omg
My psychology teacher used this as an example when we were learning about operant conditioning xD
same haha
Same here XD
+Molly Levy same here at Indiana University
At my university the professor showed it too! XD
+Molly Levy Mine too...
"Bad Leonard" got me dying on the floor
Leonard's face of deep concern just makes this sequence perfect
Let me share in 4 simple examples what my psych tutor has told me.
.....
+Ve reinforcement: giving something for good behavior (eg. chocolate if homework is done)
......
-ve reinforcement: taking something away for absence of good behavior (eg. Take bicycle away if homework not done)
......
+Ve punishment: if you do something I don't like, I'll also do something you don't like (eg. mild shock for talking in high pitch)
......
-ve punishment: cutting secondary gain that someone takes for granted (eg. If child lies on the floor crying for chocolate, and the parent ignores and walks away, eventually child will stop crying)
....
Have a great day everyone!
I like the -ve ones personally.
@Amartya Chaudhuri I've heard an alternative to -ve reinforcement in the form of rewarding good behavior by absolving someone of doing something either boring or demanding (eg. doing homework instead of taking out the trash). Would this be accurate?
Joe Pavlik yes she got the negative reinforcement wrong what she described is actually negative punishment. you got negative reinforcement right (not having to take out the trash if you do your homework)
Amartya Chaudhuri thank you !!
@@ineskhalfi3492 like to prefer any good books for somebody whose not a psychological student and doesn't have to give exams on psychology...
I was reading body keeps the score earlier a little bit
Organizational Behavior brought me here. I just realized my wife has been using these methods on me for years. Well played, spouse, well played.
lol
she bazinga'd you
I wanted Leonard to tell Penny that Sheldon was trying to train her, and for her to say that she had actually trained Sheldon to give her chocolate.
Consideriding that she became herself again after he stopped giving chocolate, that seems to be the case.
@@MeushellNot really , Sheldon was actually gonna achieve his goal , not the pool and dolphin , but yeah , Leonard would have stopped it sooner
in psychology now, would sheldon spraying lenny count as positive punishment?
+Tamirra Glover yes, it is.
negative reinforcement*
@@JCcrackle It's positive punishment. Negative reinforcement would be taking away something undesired, for example taking out Penny's trash everytime Penny display a good behavior. And yes I am taking a psychology class now and our professor linked us here.
No that would be negative punishment. Positive punishment would be rewarding a negative behavior. Like how Leonard and Penny does what Sheldon wants all the time to avoid him from complaining or resorting to childish tactics to get what he wants.
Illkid1200 doesn’t hurt to google it.
Anyone else ever noticed that they are watching Bleach? Y can hear Ichigos japanese voice in hollow form in the Backround (arround 0:42 and 1:07-1:10)
I thought it was Lelouch from Code Geass? Oh well, I'm so glad I'm not the only one who noticed something different; I thought I was going crazy!!! xD
***** I can definitely say its not Code Geass, because coincidentally that is and will for ever be my faviorite nr. 1 anime;) i have watched it countless times in Japenese, German and English!
But after comparing it I am not so sure anymore myself if it really is ichigo hollows voice... Well but at least i am certain it is Japanese and probably an anime:P
I thought the same thing. Sounds like Ichigo with his hallow mask on
Hollow Ichigo sounds slightly different. Ain't him. Really seems to be Lelouch then according to other comments
It was the fight between Ichigo and his zanpakto (inner hallow)
4:10 that was seriously unbelievable
*Bad Leonard* 😂
I just came here to study for my psychology class.
Never thought I'd ever find an appropriate use for RUclips that didn't entail music videos or spirit science documentaries
wow… this comment aged interestingly
Spirit science… why do I not like the sound of that?
No matter how many times I see this episode and others I still laugh. Love this show
লল
লললললললললংলললংলংংললললললললংলললললংললললললললংললললললললললললললললললংললংললললললললললংললল
It’s even more funny when you actually know psychology
By the way not lab rat, it was usually dogs and pigeons
I like when Sheldon is overpowering them all and the last chocolate throw was hilarious 😂
I swear to God I hear the scrambled voice of Jun Fukuyama as Lelouch from Code Geass as Penny takes her phone call outside. o.o It's not English, at the very least. xD
+Anna Mae F (ShadowJackal35) It might be watch they are watching because I agree with that statement.
Nope it's bleach
The ideas of positive and negative punishment/reinforcement are sometimes confused.
Negative reinforcement means taking away a negative stimulus. An example would be a chore.
Positive Reinforcement means you’re giving the person a positive stimulus. In this example it was a chocolate.
Positive punishment is when you add a negative stimulus. So giving someone an extra chore is a form of positive punishment.
Negative punishment is taking away a positive stimulus. An example would be taking away video games from a child.
When they say positive they don’t mean it as something that’s good, they mean it adds something. When they say negative that doesn’t mean it’s bad it means they are taking away something.
Sheldon in this case used positive reinforcement to reinforce certain behaviors in Penny. Sheldons saying that mild electric shocks which btw is unethical is not negative reinforcement. That would be positive punishment because he is adding a negative stimulus not taking away a positive stimulus.
The writers of the show should not be using punishment and reinforcement interchangeably. They are both distinct in method but strive for the same result.
Thanks a lot. Have exams tomorrow. Never really understood the framework before this.
you seem to be confused yourself? you've just mentioned chore for both negative reinforcement and positive punishment.
@@alireza5218 You seem confused. The Negative Reinforcement is taking away a chore. The Positive Punishment is adding a chore. It's not that complicated.
@@bable6314 His examples need a little more context. Negative means to take away something whereas positive means to add something. But reinforcement means to encouraged some behavior and punishment means to discouraged some behavior. So there needs to be clarity when you say that taking away a chore is an example of negative reinforcement. What behavior is the subject encouraging when said subject is taking away something (i.e. the chore) from the object?
Isn't this how we train.... I mean "teach" 😏 our kids to be functional humans
Kala Bell yeah and they will follow in your footsteps and to become functional sociopaths/ narcissists 😉
@@saifulismail641 So giving my toddler stickers for going on the potty or using gummy bears to learn math with my 1st grader or sharing a chocolate with my teenager when we have girl talk is sociopathic/narcissistic behavior? I hope they follow in my footsteps
Kala Bell 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
RUclips be like!
RUclips 2009:no
RUclips 2010:no
RUclips 2011:no
RUclips 2012:no
RUclips 2013:no
RUclips 2014:no
RUclips 2015:no
RUclips 2016:no
RUclips 2017:no
RUclips 2018:no
RUclips 2019: LET'S PUT THIS IN EVERYONE'S RECOMMENDATIONS
that is a lot of no's
lukySalt9000 Lok want a chocolate?
Unoriginal
My college psych professor showed us this clip about 6 years ago. I always remembered it and meant to watch the show but just recently got into it (I know, I'm SO late) and came across this scene..brought back memories 😂
Bad Leonard 😂😂
Great clip. Love the enthusiastic discussion on reinforcers and punishers. It’s not inherent to the stimulus whether it works as a punisher or a reinforcer. The only thing that determines the function of a stimulus is its effect on the studied behaviour in the context in which the behaviour occurs. I.e. chocolate can serve as both reinforcer and punisher for the same person, in different contexts.
Though it was used incorrectly in this case, negative reinforcement is an actual behavioral modification technique: "The removal of an unpleasant reinforcer can also strengthen behavior. This is known as Negative Reinforcement because it is the removal of an adverse stimulus which is ‘rewarding’ to the animal. Negative reinforcement strengthens behavior because it stops or removes an unpleasant experience."
Straight from Skinner himself.
And that's the basics of how torture works
I have tried positive reinforcement with one of my kids and it only works to a certain degree. What psychologists fail to tell you is that the child will begin to ask for a reward for every single thing they do. " mom, look i tied my shoes. Where is my star?" "mom, look i flushed the toilet. Where is my star?" etc. Etc. Then you need to buy more star packs, more prizes, and the child learns to manipulate. Smh some kids are too darn smart. Lol
Error, Big Bang! The getting squirted in the face with a water bottle or receiving electric shocks for "bad" behavior is actually positive punishment, not negative reinforcement. Positive punishment is when you recieve something unpleasant for a behavior, e.g., the water bottle/shock examples. Negative reinforcement is when you lose something pleasant for a behavior, e.g., a child lies and therefore is grounded from playing with friends for the week.
Sorry....nerding out here, as I'm a MSW student ;)
Isn't your last example actually negative punishment?
No, because punishment would be receiving something. So, a child likes and they receive a spanking. Grounding is taking something away...in this case, friend time.
Kristina French
Pretty sure "positive" is used for receiving something and "negative" means taking something away. When you're using punishment, be it negative or positive, you try to decrease the behaviour; with reinforcement you're trying to reinforce the behaviour.
Ah yes, Master :) You are RIGHT!
- negative = something taken away (in this case, the opportunity to play with friends)
- punishment = decreases behavior (in this case, lying)
I got all discombobulated.
Wrong! Negative reinforcement is when the occurrence of a behaviour is followed by the removal of an aversive stimulus which increases the likelihood of the behaviour reoccurring in the future.
So we all came here from psychology?
Yes
Nope
Shut up
This was an example of POSITIVE PUNISHMENT. The target behavior was that the girl speaking in a high annoying voice reg. Sheldon wanted to "lower the voice to a more pleasing register." They DECREASED the high register behavior when they added the stimuli of chocolate.
You're on the right track but process-wise, this was most likely a case of positive reinforcement (with prompting). Because the chocolate followed the low-pitched talking, it is likely that this will increase in the future and because low-pitched talking is incompatible with high-pitched talking, if low-pitched talking increases high-pitched talking must decrease.
joeclemm15 it would be a positive consequence, not a positive punishment. That's an oxymoron.
@@beckysmisery.9769 It's not an oxymoron lol. It may sound like one, but it's actually what it's called.
Leonard's face figuring this out was so funny
very mild electric shocks
That's why I love big bang theory
No tissue damage... lol
@Amira Djiar Do you know how weird it is to get 2 responses in less than a week on a 3 year old comment? It's really interesting. This video been making its rounds again?
Sheldon used unoptimal variation of this technique.
The problem with giving rewards like that is that the learniing person will almost immidietly abandon new behaviours the moment rewards stop coming.
The trick to making it stay, even after rewards are gone at least for a while, is to reward a fracion of positive behaviours, not all of them. It takes longer for a permament change of bahaviour to occur, but it also becomes somewhat resistent to lack of rewards coming after it does.
Do what you want with that knowledge.
Silent evidence - for all you know Gasai Sheldon is doing that just off screen?
As usual, sheldon doesn't have a clue.
66 days for a new behaviour to become a habit.
That's a butt load of chocolates.😊
1:25 I was waiting for that 😂
2:32 But wasn’t expecting that 😂
Without reading anymore of the comments, I’m just going to say it.
There’s not a thing about Penny that isn’t pleasing.
I wish my family use positive reinforcement to me. I work hard to them but my family scold me and embarassing me in front of everyone everytime i made mistake and they make things worse
I like how you can see how penny is trying not to laugh as she repeats the word freaky
yeh they corrected this in season 8 where Sheldon confirms the incorrect use of Negative Reinforcement. let it go already
Just having a good discussion of the subtleties of behaviorism. I appreciate the input... as others obviously do as well.
In a later episode, they explained that it's positive punishment which is often confused with negative reinforcement.
I cam here for my psychology class xD Yassss
saaaaaameeee
Sameeeeeee only its physiological perspectives on children's behaviour
yeah on how to become a full time sociopath/ npd XD
After the second time I was like , oh my gosh hes going pavlov
why my teacher did not use this example this would be so easy to understand omg this was funnyXD
Negative reinforcement occurs when an UNWANTED outcome is removed following a behaviour.. So wouldn't applying mild electric shocks be punishment?
+YonathanFit No because if she did the wanted behavior she would not receive the shock, in term removing the possibility of the negative consequent. Also, punishment is used to get rid of an undesired behavior. It is not a viable method for establishing a desired behavior but only to stop one that is undesirable
+Ryan Lonnie The show made a parallel between previously squirting Leonard and possibly shocking Penny. Leonard was only squirted when he did something that Sheldon disapproved of which makes it a positive punishment. Negative reinforcement is when something is already there and being taken away. Penny is not being shocked so to do so would be a positive punishment as opposed to the positive reinforcement she's getting for good behavior. Getting rid of an undesired behavior IS establishing a desired behavior and vice versa; that is the point.
You are actually correct. Electric shock would be considered a positive punishment because he is speaking of decreasing a behavior (which is always referred to in behavioral terms as punishment) and adding a stimulus (in behavioral terms it is referred to as positive).
Negative reinforcement is like applying ointment to remove itchiness (removing unpleasant stimulus the itch, increases the behavior, applying ointment)
I used to do this with one of my bosses. She was perfectly aware of what I was doing, but it made the office day a little more fun.
If I ever found out someone was trying to do that to me, I’d tear them a new one. NO EXCEPTIONS. 👿
Yeah, it should be called, MANIPULATION, not positive anything, lol
01:07 Is that hollowfied ichigo in the background? Are they watching bleach?
HE'S PAVLOVING PENNY!!!
Actually, he mentioned the electric shocks, so what he could do is say, "I will remove these shocks if you do this..." That is negative reinforcement. However Leonard says, "you're not squirting her in the face with water" after Leonard says, "if you let me use negative reinforcement I can get it done before bed." That is the fail. Unless Leonard just sprays her until she does what he wants her to do. There is a very fine line in conditioning.
The show uses the term 'negative reinforcement' wrong. Negative reinforcement is still REINFORCING a behavior (making it more common), but it's doing it through removal of an unwanted stimulus. So if Sheldon decided whenever Penny did something he liked, he decided to leave the room for 10 minutes and give her and Leonard some time alone, then that would be negative reinforcement.
Making an action occur less is called punishment, not reinforcement.
Negative reinforcement only creates resentment and apprehension of trust
No if it's follower by a much higher value positive reinforcer
When you start wondering who this would work on...
This is a clear example of Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), formerly known as Behavior Modification which was developed by B.F. Skinner.
I am with Sheldon on this one, It sounds like a brilliant idea and I am going to try it.
4:41 In my opinion... Well, I don't know if that help with the behaving. I only know that people do that just for have fun.
It's part of Psych 101 it's a Primary Reinforcer where the Primary Reinforcers are listed as Food, Water, Sex, Sleep, Oxygen.
And Secondary Reinforcers are listed as 4:53 Money, Grades, Praise, Hugs, Etc.
And the irony was as the show went on it was actually Penny that helped make Sheldon a better person. I know everyone talks about how Amy changed Sheldon but it all started with Penny.
Spraying on the face and giving electric shock are not negative reinforcement. Those are positive punishment.
Based on what i've learned:
1. Positive reinforcement - yes, giving rewards to encourage good behaviour eg giving chocolate for doing homework
2. Negative reinforcement - removing sth unpleasant to encourage the good behaviour eg if you do your homework, you won't have to clean the house
3. Positive punishment - giving sth unpleasant for bad behaviour eg you don't do your homework, you will have to stand on the chair
4. Negative punishment - removing sth pleasant for bad behaviour eg you don't do your homework, you cannot watch the tv
Reinforcement is used to encourage good behaviour while punishment is to reduce bad behaviour.
Correct me if im wrong cause i learned this like 4 years ago
I found the error! (my prof asked us to find it). Sheldon suggests using 'negative reinforcement' and gives the example of electric shocks. In reality, negative reinforcement is taking away a bad/undesired thing in order to reward the subject. So, a better example would be taking away something Penny hated as a reward. Bazinga
Sheldon is actually using differential reinforcement of Alternative behavior to modify Penny’s behavior.
@92jcgb You're right in that, but I was referring to when Sheldon sprayed water at Penny and referred to it as negative reinforcement, when it's actually positive punishment.
This is the first video where the majority of the comments are not stupid nonsense, trolling or bullshit haha, but yeah what Sheldon suggested was positive punishment ( aversive stimulus that is added to the situation )
@MrMasterful13
Although the evidence suggests that negative reinforcement is highly effective (markedly more so than negative or positive punishments), the ethical implications of any or all of these (along with what is known about the emotional effects of these techniques) are pretty clear: any punishment is a poor educational tool, and negative reinforcement is likely to be problematic (depending on the form of the noxious stimulus to be used as the reinforcer). They're not all that good.
Wouldn't it be both though? Penny stops herself from doing something to avoid dealing with Sheldon's nagging; negative reinforcement. And whenever Penny does something right, he says something nice and gives her a chocolate; positive reinforcement. Could be just me, but that's how I saw it.
I tried this once but with almonds. Worked pretty well with three people. I eventually felt bad and stopped, but got some pretty good favours. It was great.
Here because my psych professor told us to watch this for operant conditioning
Victoria uni of wellington lolol
For everyone in my class, the term he uses incorrectly is "negative reinforcement". The proper term for using the spray bottle or electric shocks would be "positive punishment". Negative reinforcement is when you remove something unpleasant.
we watched this in our psych class today while we were talking about operate conditioning : )
*bad Leaonard*
It’s gets me everytime! 🤣
@WheatOcean
"Making an action occur less is called punishment, not reinforcement"
Not if one is using a technique called DRO - the differential reinforcement of other behaviour. In this technique, a particular behaviour is sent into extinction by being ignored, whilst a preferred or more desired behaviour is reinforced positively. The target behaviour occurs less but not from the use of an aversive; it is the use of an aversive that makes behavioural reduction a punishment.
This actually works on people. I used this method on my little brothers so they would leave me alone and stay out of my hair.
@ps3gamerful Reinforcement is something “occurring in conjunction
with an act, tends to increase the probability that the act will occur again.” Positive means that "something the subject wants" is added (quotes from page 1 of Karen Pryor's book "Don't Shoot The Dog").
@20WvS11 I know that you are wrong. You can't add an electric shock to increase a behaviour - it would be to decrease the behaviour - the shock is removed once the desired behaviour is acheived this is the point of reinforcement. You seemed to have forgotten it is not about reinforcement but punishment as well - the Spraying of water is positive punishment (adding something to decrease a behaviour), the stopping of spray is negitive reinforcement.
Jen Higgins yoooooo...6 years too late. Wish I could go back to the future to say you're wrong. You can't assume "shock" is a punisher. If you deliver "shock" contingent upon a specific behavior and that behavior increases in the presence of a common antecedent stimulus, then reinforcement occurred, and shock is a reinforcer.
He should deliver the reinforcer after she completed the task. This actually isn't positive reinforcement. He delivered the reinforcer prior the behavior was completed, however, the chocolate contrived her motivating operation to behave, not a consequent condition.
In a later episode involving procrastination, Sheldon points out to the group the incorrect use of "negative reinforcement" that he himself uses incorrectly in this episode.
Water squirting is positive reinforcement
"Bad Leanord" LOL
Leonard*
Bad Jamie
Maybe that's why Penny likes Sheldon, he has conditioned her to like him.
That is a Godiva Box. Nice chocolates to be using to get Penny trained.
CTU online course.Retired disabled LPN with over 15 years of service. Majoring in Psychology 😂😂😂I see all of our instructor's have here tonight. Greetings & #BLESSINGS
What is the error in this video considering operant conditioning.
negative reinforcement
@@Duesi2024 yup. Thid scene is showing.positive punishment as negative reinforcement.
@AdamsTeinz The adverse stimulus is the water. By adding it to end a behavior, he was using punishment, not negative reinforcement.
AP Psychology brought me here
I'm a GCSE psychology student and I am using TBBT examples to reinforce my understanding of keywords and retain the information better. This is so great though! 😂
Positive reinforcement sheldon cooper edition anyone?
This Foreshadowed the pigeon ping pong with the mention of BF skinner.
@UndecidedFan you can't give something desirable to decrease a behaviour - he reinforces her being quiet (or her decision to be quiet). Spraying water is positive punishment (adding a consequence to decrease a behaviour). Negitive Reinforcement would be stopping the water once the desired behavour has been acheived.
@Patrizsche I think it's a mix of both Positive Punishment and Positive Reinforcement. Because in certain cases he is GIVING chocolates to DECREES the likelihood that she'll keep talking but also GIVING chocolates to INCREASE the likelihood of her good behavior like giving his spot back. But it is defs not Negative anything
Isn't given chocolates to Penny to decrease her loud talking a form of Positive Punishment? The other examples, such as her putting away the dishes and moving from Sheldon's spot is Positive Reinforcement. They are using a lot of subgroups of operant conditioning here I guess?
All i can say is extinction will happen rather quickly if the rate of this fixed ratio continues.
@Lefemenikita We try to modify other people's behavior all the time. Bosses do it by offering promotions and bonuses, parents do it openly through punishment and reward, governments do essentially the same thing with law enforcement, and people do it unconsciously all the time, as we are generally more pleasant to people who don't annoy us. I think it could be debated whether what Sheldon is doing is actually wrong, as it isn't as if he is actually harming Penny in any way.
Some might consider pre-seizure inducing screen flashes and ads as electrical stimulus attempting to adjust consumer behaviors
@jg24de3 Ahh but Sheldon never mentioned how he would use the electric shocks, if he had them on continuosly until she behaved favourably that would be negative reinforcement. Which I think is what he was getting at.
By the way...I'm pretty proud to be the only one to pick you up on that.
My Health & Social Care teacher showed us this earlier on for the psychology unit we're doing and I was laughing so much! This is brilliant :D
Interesting how Penny unknowingly used positive reinforcement on Leonard at the end to get him to build her bed for her.
everyone's here for a psychology class but I'm here for ~sociology~
also when Sheldon mentioned negative reinforcement (electrical shock) that's still technically positive (punishment), cause it's adding something, not removing
@jg24de3 actually it is positive reinforcement. listen to what Lenard says at 1:13. Sheldon is giving Penny chocolate when she "behaves correctly." He's selecting the behavior (such as leaving the room to talk on her phone) to increase, and then adding the positive reinforcer (chocolate) to increase the behavior. Although he is "removing an adverse behavior," ultimately he is increasing the desired behavior
03:37 what are the watching when you already know remember Leonard paused the video...
And he unpaused it at 02:31.
my psychology professor should use this video as an example about positive reinforcement.
I wish they did this more on the show, using science on unsuspecting friends.
Almost a perfect score there Sheldon....However correcting her with spray or shots would not be Negative reinforcement . Negative Reinforcement = Removing something to encourage a behavior. It would be positive punishment, Positive Punishment = Adding something to discourage a behavior....But overall Well done. Lol xD
@LupusLudi
Wrong. The stimulus in R- is not a punisher, although it may start out as an applied P+ and be carried on as the basis for a R- schedule. The crux is as to whether the noxious stimulus is applied when a target undesired behaviour has occurred, or whether the noxious stimulus will be removed contingent upon engagement in a preferred or more desired behaviour. The first is a P+ and the second is an R-. Etherealeyes has it right. Your use of terminology is errant.
Sheldon wants to stimulate good (in his eyes) behaviour, for that he wants to use positive and negative reinforcement. Both termes are correct because of that goal. Did he only want to get rid of bad (in his eyes) behaviour, he would use positive (or negative) punishment.