It's definitely a court of law, not necessarily a court of justice. If you fail to prove your point, you loose; that's the game of law. Interested in how the EC + presiding officers would prove duress when put into the box to be cross examined under oath. Cause and effect has to be LEGALLY proven. Otherwise in future Black stars will say they lost football matches because fans booed them at the stadium. Duress cannot be a reason for professional incompetence, at least NOT in the courtroom.
The Ladies were fair but the Guy not,he spoke only in favour of NDC otherwise how come he missed the point NPP and even EC made that their officers declared the result under duress,,we should be guide by fair play at all Times as Journalist
So you also support unlawful acts right? Someone would claim he/she owns your properties with documents and you be there and let the person take it wai. Illegality is Illegality wai!!! Don't ever be happy with unlawful acts
It's definitely a court of law, not necessarily a court of justice. If you fail to prove your point, you loose; that's the game of law. Interested in how the EC + presiding officers would prove duress when put into the box to be cross examined under oath. Cause and effect has to be LEGALLY proven. Otherwise in future Black stars will say they lost football matches because fans booed them at the stadium. Duress cannot be a reason for professional incompetence, at least NOT in the courtroom.
@@kwartengkofidominic293 that illegality was what EC officials must go to court with evidence to prove. You can not talk about illegality without been able to prove it.
It's definitely a court of law, not necessarily a court of justice. If you fail to prove your point, you loose; that's the game of law.
Interested in how the EC + presiding officers would prove duress when put into the box to be cross examined under oath.
Cause and effect has to be LEGALLY proven.
Otherwise in future Black stars will say they lost football matches because fans booed them at the stadium.
Duress cannot be a reason for professional incompetence, at least NOT in the courtroom.
Better to use the court process than threats by hooligans.
NPP will never come back to power again
same was said about the ndc 8yrs ago but here we are today so don,t be too sure
Says you, who is the spokesperson of God .
The Ladies were fair but the Guy not,he spoke only in favour of NDC otherwise how come he missed the point NPP and even EC made that their officers declared the result under duress,,we should be guide by fair play at all Times as Journalist
EC said their officers declared the result under duress which means that there was an declaration so what is Afenyo Markin saying?
THIS EC IS A BIG PROBLEM I TELL YOU
So you also support unlawful acts right?
Someone would claim he/she owns your properties with documents and you be there and let the person take it wai.
Illegality is Illegality wai!!!
Don't ever be happy with unlawful acts
It's definitely a court of law, not necessarily a court of justice. If you fail to prove your point, you loose; that's the game of law.
Interested in how the EC + presiding officers would prove duress when put into the box to be cross examined under oath.
Cause and effect has to be LEGALLY proven.
Otherwise in future Black stars will say they lost football matches because fans booed them at the stadium.
Duress cannot be a reason for professional incompetence, at least NOT in the courtroom.
@@kwartengkofidominic293 that illegality was what EC officials must go to court with evidence to prove. You can not talk about illegality without been able to prove it.
Ignorant bloggers...stop your propaganda