Rand Paul And John Kennedy Get Into Animated Clash Over Extending Programs If Government Shuts Down

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 янв 2025

Комментарии • 1,8 тыс.

  • @lilpinksliplee7310
    @lilpinksliplee7310 Год назад +884

    STOP SENDING OUR TAX DOLLARS TO FOREIGN COUNTRIES IF YOU CAN'T FUND OUR OWN COUNTRY.

  • @pensacolawatchdog
    @pensacolawatchdog Год назад +52

    I agree With Senator Paul on this one! 👊🏻💯

    • @theoryofpersonality1420
      @theoryofpersonality1420 Год назад

      What you stand with being selfish because you think the problem doesn't affect you? Flooding can happen anywhere. Especially with H.A.A.R.P. be careful what you wish for. You may just get it.

  • @rickmoore8293
    @rickmoore8293 Год назад +224

    Senator Paul is on to something. Insure primary homes. If you have a second vacation home in a flood zone you are you are on your own.

    • @vaportrail6315
      @vaportrail6315 Год назад +3

      Doesn't sound fair to me perhaps you should only be able to insure your primary car or pickup - any other cars ect are not insurable...your on your own!

    • @rickmoore8293
      @rickmoore8293 Год назад +24

      The government does not insure our cars!

    • @carlonardone2134
      @carlonardone2134 Год назад +12

      @@vaportrail6315 taxpayers dont subsidize auto insurance in the same way flood insurance.

    • @lufknuht5960
      @lufknuht5960 Год назад +2

      So you want couples to divorce for each can claim a primary home.

    • @EricH0skins
      @EricH0skins Год назад +11

      @@lufknuht5960thats the second time ive seen you comment with this straw man argument of no substantive point other than to flail about. im sure you not one of these people who use the governmental loop holes for wealth…

  • @JamesBond-g7x
    @JamesBond-g7x Год назад +155

    Rand Paul is a gift to this country! He sure does know his stuff, and we are so lucky to have him…thanks Rand!

    • @wraithTAS
      @wraithTAS Год назад +2

      He takes after his father.

    • @ToomersCorner
      @ToomersCorner Год назад +1

      He should be head of the senate

    • @SwiftRead
      @SwiftRead Год назад

      Signed,
      Remdisivir & Gilead Pharmaceuticals 😂

    • @kerirae4777
      @kerirae4777 Год назад

      Would be a great speaker of the house!!
      He damn sure knows how this govt!!
      Hope they reforms this bill- we shouldn't have to rebuild mansions for the rich!
      You get flooded more than twice- you pay it!
      We need Rand!👍💯🇺🇸

    • @Invertedworldx
      @Invertedworldx Месяц назад

      Exactly And They Both Just had the same debate Dec 20 2024 AGAIN to extend the program till sept of 2025 and once again rand proposed a spot on plan to amend some restrictions

  • @marilynotte7059
    @marilynotte7059 Год назад +162

    I used to like Kennedy and then I discovered that he voted "yes" on the last Ukraine support bill. Sorry, John, you no longer have my support. At his "median priced house" estimate, I find I'm a pauper and living way below the average! I worked all my life to get what I've got and I only have one home. A second home should not ever be paid (in any way or form) for by the government when we have so many people living on the street. Kennedy has been a real disappointment lately.

    • @yT579
      @yT579 Год назад +24

      I agree that Kenndy lost my support when he voted yes on money to Ukraine

    • @debbiehall9396
      @debbiehall9396 Год назад +24

      Kennedy is def showing some rino stripes here!
      I'm fed up w/ the way these people spend our money SO freely!
      I don't own a home, why should I pay 2 insure someone else's?
      Just what would these people do all day if they did not have our money to play with????

    • @bittersweet2253
      @bittersweet2253 Год назад +17

      Same here, lost a lot of respect for Kennedy when he did that, makes you wonder who you can trust anymore.

    • @godschild3887
      @godschild3887 Год назад +9

      ​@@bittersweet2253You and I feel the same way. I no longer trust either side. I really liked Kennedy, but then he changed. I was so disappointed and now know he is not for the American people and is more interested in supporting the Ukrainians.

    • @tashalorm4313
      @tashalorm4313 Год назад

      @@godschild3887 I am very against this proxy war, and I am against sending more money to Ukraine. The irony is I don't think the money went to Ukraine, it looks most likely (blanchissement d'argent).

  • @drewha101
    @drewha101 Год назад +25

    Two of my favorite senators. But Paul is 100% correct.

    • @Rick-bi9fw
      @Rick-bi9fw Год назад

      It's weird how Kennedy ignored Paul saying we should insure primary homes. He's a fraud. Move out the flood zone. Stopping living on shit land and having everyone else pay for it.

    • @Rick-bi9fw
      @Rick-bi9fw Год назад

      "I thought Republicans " I thought Republicans were for capitalism and free markets. The markets are saying don't live there. He's a liar. Socialism for rich and crony capitalism for everyone else.

  • @GaryFitzgerald-zs3zg
    @GaryFitzgerald-zs3zg Год назад +232

    I agree with Paul. We should not substitute millionaires for their insurance!

    • @harleysubaru
      @harleysubaru Год назад +6

      Yup it's ridiculous to support millionaires with tax dollars

    • @cameronspence4977
      @cameronspence4977 Год назад +7

      What about the other 80% of the flood insurance recipients that are just normal people whose home might not be covered by regular insurance?

    • @artiefount
      @artiefount Год назад +5

      Subsidize, not substitute

    • @vonnano3561
      @vonnano3561 Год назад +14

      @@cameronspence4977 Then they should move somewhere else to live. Whenever the government gets involved in an industry, it destroys it. Be it medical insurance, mortgage, or flood insurance. We should let the free market run these programs, not some stupid politicians who think they are smarter than the free market.

    • @vonnano3561
      @vonnano3561 Год назад +13

      @@olabrk The fact that anybody can rely on this flood insurance program to repeatedly rebuild flooded/destroyed houses is absurd. Exclusion is wrong, but putting some words to limit how many times you can rebuild a flooded house at the exact or approximate location is not too much to ask for; it's common sense.

  • @mikedenham5882
    @mikedenham5882 Год назад +57

    Is Senator Paul the only one that is watching our money?

    • @ThePoehladian
      @ThePoehladian Год назад +5

      Him and Trump.

    • @billwilliams699
      @billwilliams699 Год назад +6

      Yes, Paul is the only true fiscal conservative

    • @ccampbell7214
      @ccampbell7214 Год назад +1

      I think so .. I'd probably vote for him if he ran for presidency .. Fix it today! Don't keep passing down the line...

    • @TherealJesseLivermore
      @TherealJesseLivermore Год назад +1

      @@ThePoehladianLaughable that you think Trump is anyway responsible when it comes to fiscal and monetary policy

    • @ThePoehladian
      @ThePoehladian Год назад

      @@TherealJesseLivermore The directives have been put into legislation worldwide. The Alliance is overseeing the implementation of this and so much more, including GESARA, Galactic currency (as your world is about to enlarge in ways we won't discuss at this time.) Jubilee or debt forgiveness, A low flat tax for NEW ITEMS only, no tax on food or.....say.....a used car. Reimbursement checks to stimulate the economy of New Earth. A cross border currency that settles peer to peer transactions in seconds, virtually for free with no banks or intermediaries, on a public block chain (that would see corruption immediately.) A one tiered Justice System who's members uphold The Constitution and agree with The Law of One. And lastly a kind of worldwide Love that Earth has not known in many aons due to the contagion known as Duality consciousness.
      We bid all of the Earth plane Godspeed in their awakening process. 🙏

  • @dtruth5769
    @dtruth5769 Год назад +217

    I LOVE KENNEDY. BUT PAUL IS CORRECT ON THIS ONE.

    • @crsu9680
      @crsu9680 Год назад +5

      True. If Kennedy is right in his description of the homes in LA, then they would still be fine with Paul's proposal.

    • @shafts2447
      @shafts2447 Год назад

      You agree with Kennedy escalating this proxy war? Sending billions of our tax money to Nazis in the Azov battalion?

  • @penningtonbuilt
    @penningtonbuilt Год назад +15

    Sen. Paul is correct. The gov shouldn't subsidize flood insurance for the rich. Sen. Kennedy is trying to make this into a moral issue "right in the middle of hurricane season." These concocted moral panics are no way to govern. We have to start being fiscally responsible.

  • @cameronsinnett8117
    @cameronsinnett8117 Год назад +245

    Rand Paul’s suggestions are common sense, only 1 home per policy, and put an income cap on it, not the “value of the home”

    • @Bigfoothawk
      @Bigfoothawk Год назад +7

      Suggestions mean nothing unless implemented.

    • @clydapowers3987
      @clydapowers3987 Год назад +4

      Are you put a cap on it like that and it's going to make it so low income people do get coverage for their homes because they don't have very much money and the cap will lower their ability to have the insurance they need to replace their own if it's washed away

    • @pegasuvius9765
      @pegasuvius9765 Год назад +8

      Rebuild a single family home. Not a bigger better home. Keep it simple. This works as long as regulation and policy don't get in the way and up the rebuilding costs. The bill can be amended during an interim though as Sen. Paul explained.

    • @damehal
      @damehal Год назад +3

      I'm sure this is why Kennedy wants to kick the can, for good reason it sounds like they need to tweak it a little 2 months seems reasonable. Rand Paul is being a little bit of a bully here. Seems to me he's making a point. I just don't know what it is.

    • @rt3box6tx74
      @rt3box6tx74 Год назад +9

      I wonder what would happen if claims were limited to once per owner?

  • @onthelake9554
    @onthelake9554 Год назад +81

    Great job gentlemen, agree with Rand on this one and am a but disappointed with Mr. Kennedy , did we just now decide the program sucked or could this have been handled a while back you know before it was a problem . Thanks for pushing Rand Paul , this country desperately needs accountability .

    • @worlddevourer7740
      @worlddevourer7740 Год назад

      Kennedy has NEVER, NOT ONCE, put forward a reform bill on this socialism for the rich law. He HAS extended it and place premium caps on it at least 3 times, though. He is a liar and of low character. He, and all of Louisiana, should be ashamed.

    • @SwiftRead
      @SwiftRead Год назад

      Signed,
      Insurance Companies do NOT cover floods, and
      16 Trillion spent on Covid Relief in 2020

    • @slappy8941
      @slappy8941 Год назад +2

      The rule of thumb in any large organization, especially government, is to ignore problems until they become emergencies, and then blame everyone.

  • @rickyhayes8206
    @rickyhayes8206 Год назад +9

    Thank you, Rand Paul. I like Senator Kennedy usually but he is wrong about this.

  • @monacallender721
    @monacallender721 Год назад +67

    Your exactly right Paul exactly right.

  • @keithcampbell7820
    @keithcampbell7820 Год назад +11

    Here in Ohio, I don’t have the desire to supplement someone else’s desire to live in a flood prone or susceptible area.
    Nor do I expect someone from anywhere in this country to do likewise.

    • @zgarrett14
      @zgarrett14 Год назад

      I wonder how Ohio gets Federal Money? I am sure yall have a program that receives Federal Subsidies just like every other .
      Rand Paul is correct. It's a corrupt system and people work the system all the time. Incredibly depressing.

  • @paulgrad5183
    @paulgrad5183 Год назад +357

    Senator Paul is absolutely right. If private insurance won't insure it, it shows that homes shouldn't be built in that place. The Senate could easily, within a few days, could reform this program.

    • @will-vi9pk
      @will-vi9pk Год назад +10

      That is actually a unarguable point.

    • @donnawoodard8249
      @donnawoodard8249 Год назад +12

      If private insurance companies are the crux in this, No One's home will be covered! That is not an exaggeration!

    • @jackstiles458
      @jackstiles458 Год назад

      insurance companies are a fraud. The only reasons why insurance companies exist is because of a debased currency and Americans inability to invest due to a weak currency. He we are tailoring our entire social-economic system around failed monetary policies.

    • @minnesnowtan9970
      @minnesnowtan9970 Год назад

      Insurance companies refuse to write policies. They want premiums without payouts. The Gov, especially fed, should NOT be in the insurance business. Insurance companies are hurting because of so much fraud, but that is the cost of doing improper business.

    • @MikeLyons2011
      @MikeLyons2011 Год назад +12

      I agree with a "means test" or a limit on the property value. I live in New Orleans which is in a flood plain but is also a vital shipping port. I don't live anywhere near the coast or on the water at all but everyone here is required to have flood insurance. I think anyone who does get flooded in LA should be forced to raise their house and that's pretty much the standard in New Orleans and surrounding areas since Katrina but the rest of the states should have this same rule to prevent repeat claims on the same property.

  • @johnbutera5805
    @johnbutera5805 Год назад +6

    I usually agree with Sen Kennedy BUT I have to agree with Sen Paul. We're talking about FEDERAL flood insurance. If you want to buy a second home, or an expensive home, then you had better be able to afford private flood insurance!!! And the CAP should be based on the going prices in the area. Millionaires should buy their OWN DAMNED INSURANCE!!!

  • @mikeklinger1712
    @mikeklinger1712 Год назад +57

    I agree primary homes only! Primary home is what you drive to work from and that greatly effects your living situation! But a vacation home can be insured privately! If you can afford the toy you can afford the insurance

    • @mikeb5372
      @mikeb5372 Год назад +1

      Right! Next thing taxpayers will be paying the insurance premiums of Porsche & Mercedes drivers. People, rich or poor, probably shouldn't be living in likely flood zones

    • @glitch-pr3nr
      @glitch-pr3nr Год назад +1

      The problem is the mandates of insurance on mortgage requirements. In a flood zone, it is a crapshoot whether it is a first, or second home.

  • @Politicalfan17
    @Politicalfan17 Год назад +8

    As usual, Rand Paul is right. Rand is a special kind of principled, good man.

    • @SGomez3050
      @SGomez3050 Год назад

      Like his father

    • @Politicalfan17
      @Politicalfan17 Год назад

      @@SGomez3050 Exactly. This country had the ability to rescue itself when Ron ran for President and we blew it.

  • @markoshea8993
    @markoshea8993 Год назад +55

    The good thing about these hearings is we get to see how ridiculous the spending is in government

  • @OldschoolRed
    @OldschoolRed Год назад +49

    My tax dollars should not pay for someones VACATION home when I cant even afford to buy my OWN home. Thank you rand paul for being a voice of common sense and reason.

    • @theoryofpersonality1420
      @theoryofpersonality1420 Год назад

      It's not. It's people's homes. Places they grew up and lived in their entire lives. Make no mistake, regardless of where you live it can flood. This isn't about one state. It's about hundreds of millions of people.

  • @Keenan-k7s
    @Keenan-k7s Год назад +257

    Thank you Rand...once again he is the only person in Washington saying what needs to be said

    • @michaelryan9311
      @michaelryan9311 Год назад +8

      So Matt gaetz is just invisible to you huh?

    • @libertypastor1307
      @libertypastor1307 Год назад +11

      I think government should never be in the insurance business.
      There is no authority delegated to it to do so in the Constitution! Period .

    • @DMminion_Tech
      @DMminion_Tech Год назад +2

      There is a few people that "say what needs to be said" but nobody is doing what needs to be done. They get paid ridiculous salaries and get away with breaking the law. Must be nice to be a selected official.

    • @criSOME1
      @criSOME1 Год назад

      Matt needs more time, he’s not there yet

    • @ms.fravell7606
      @ms.fravell7606 Год назад +1

      ​@@libertypastor1307also not in constitution for auto insurance either ..

  • @danield2685
    @danield2685 Год назад +4

    Paul is right on the money. Period. Whh the hell is the government paying your floos insurance if your a millionaire. How the hell is that even possible?!?!

  • @georgerizo9285
    @georgerizo9285 Год назад +3

    I don’t own a home and yet I still paying for all this insanity and madness, thank you Mr. Paul you are right 100%

  • @dantasticguy5435
    @dantasticguy5435 Год назад +164

    As a Canadian on the outside, I just want to say that these are two men who I highly respect in the USA. This is real, honest debate and thank God for some freedom of speech in an age where it is no longer desired. Again, coming from a country where we have a de facto dictatorship, this is good debating. It is not necessarily a win-lose debate! Hopefully, this debate leads to an equitable resolution

    • @lynnnazarewich
      @lynnnazarewich Год назад +4

      Ditto

    • @jiveturkey2875
      @jiveturkey2875 Год назад +11

      Rand has more common sense and Kennedy has more self preservation.
      Kennedy is pro America as long as America keeps his status quo.
      I have to give it to Paul.
      A guy who took a beating from a non-partisan assailant, yet still holds true to his word, a doctor who questioned the status quo during pandemic chaos...
      Guy says what he says, and means what he says.
      I can't say the same about Kennedy

    • @elguapo1507
      @elguapo1507 Год назад +9

      Absolutely and totally agree! These are 2 good men BOTH trying to protect the American people. I'm a Brit and I want to say how sorry I feel for you over there in Canada. Good luck!

    • @chrisshore9000
      @chrisshore9000 Год назад +4

      @@jiveturkey2875I like Kennedy, and Rand Paul. $250k coverage is a lil low though. Maybe there could be a secondary private insurance company to cover the rest.

    • @mobucks555
      @mobucks555 Год назад +2

      couldn't have said it better ever

  • @mousiebrown1747
    @mousiebrown1747 Год назад +4

    As a Louisiana citizen in the hurricane zone, I support RAND PAUL on this! Sen John is well-meaning, but I’m sick to death of the rich being insured over multimillion dollar beachfront homes. Cover those like the people who lost homes from Katrina and other damaging storms that hurt inland homes. Let the wealthy live in safe locations.

  • @survivingthetimes
    @survivingthetimes Год назад +443

    We should applaud success, not pay to rebuild it. It isn't the taxpayer's job to rebuild vacation homes.

    • @virtualenvironmentfellowsh6671
      @virtualenvironmentfellowsh6671 Год назад

      Especially not 20 times 🤯
      Obvious corruption - thats why we Have a DNI!! People are paid to stop it, but they aren't.

    • @ancapgrandscribe9546
      @ancapgrandscribe9546 Год назад +21

      Exactly, Rand Paul isn't saying that the modest homeowners shouldn't get it but that one's with 5 million dollar beach houses shouldn't get it, and passing it with no cap limit which is what John Kennedy wants to do will do nothing to help said working class.

    • @glitch-pr3nr
      @glitch-pr3nr Год назад

      I will restore the years the Palmer worm ate Joel. Retirement happens Dufus rufus

    • @glitch-pr3nr
      @glitch-pr3nr Год назад +2

      Build your trapezoid on the rock where storms don't wash it away. You can retire some day too? Global warming happens. Don't cut off your own noses to spite your own faces😂🎉

    • @fmayer1507
      @fmayer1507 Год назад +19

      ​@@glitch-pr3nrPeople can retire outside a flood zone. I did.

  • @pensacolawatchdog
    @pensacolawatchdog Год назад +21

    12:42 Senator Kennedy I don’t agree with you on this because that’s not fair to taxpayers across the board! Definitely a ‘NO’ on a second home! 👊🏻💯

  • @JesusCastanon-w3u
    @JesusCastanon-w3u Год назад +37

    I'm a little disappointed of Kennedy. He's playing with feelings and say many wrong things beginning with the roll of government is to protect people's private property, yes but not from flooding but from others with no right to take it from you like he wants to do with others people money as if money is not private property. Very good from Paul.

  • @DN-2012
    @DN-2012 Год назад +4

    WOW…we are getting facts to this crazy insurance bill. Thanks Sen Paul

  • @crsu9680
    @crsu9680 Год назад +119

    Much love for Rand Paul. Definitely should be limited to primary residence. I think they can get to an agreement about the cap portion of Sen. Paul's proposal.

    • @debbiehall9396
      @debbiehall9396 Год назад +5

      Kennedy is showing some of them there rino stripes!
      I don't want my taxes to pay for ins on someone's home. I don't even own a home. Maybe I'd like to save those dollars for what MY family needs!!

    • @tatianabrown6903
      @tatianabrown6903 Год назад

      Dr Rand Paul is right. Only primary homes should be covered not vacation homes of rich people!

  • @BillYenair0077
    @BillYenair0077 Год назад +13

    The money that goes everywhere but our country is enormous. The government is willing to gamble livelihoods to get their dreams to come true. America could cover the $30 billion damage of flooding easily if the money wasn’t pilfered, wasted or sent to oh, Ukraine. We always help our neighbors recover. Putting limits and income qualifications into the program would help solve the “small” problems Rand points out.

    • @nevermindme8922
      @nevermindme8922 Год назад +2

      Ukraine should be someone else’s problem. Why are we the only ones sending them money when we have homeless veterans and a government that’s about to shut down?

    • @tylere.8436
      @tylere.8436 Год назад

      ​@@nevermindme8922You'd think Europe would chip in at least.

  • @Denythematrix
    @Denythematrix Год назад +35

    Rand Paul making too much sense

  • @tomtucker5405
    @tomtucker5405 Год назад +2

    Rand Paul is a true Patriot! He should be speaker of the house!

  • @KevinBowman-u3x
    @KevinBowman-u3x Год назад +39

    Stop giving rich people our money. If they want to own a place in a high-risk area, that is their choice. Why is common sense so difficult for so many to understand.

    • @dank-mcpuffins1267
      @dank-mcpuffins1267 Год назад

      But remember, climate change, rising sea levels *- Distraction while the same preaching climate change buy multi-million dollar beach front properties.

    • @ThePoehladian
      @ThePoehladian Год назад +1

      Entitled ego maniacs.

  • @808souljahxl5
    @808souljahxl5 Год назад +4

    A rare big L for senator Kennedy. If you can afford a second home, then you can pay for your own flood insurance.

  • @MB-vu3ow
    @MB-vu3ow Год назад +328

    Thank you, Rand Paul. Rational voice amidst stupidity. . . . and covering houses that are not primary residences is insanity and greed.

    • @ancapgrandscribe9546
      @ancapgrandscribe9546 Год назад

      Yeah, Rand wasn't even opposed to the idea considering the fact that we're in an inflation hell, but to allow it to continue to steal from the taxpayer to give to the rich because it has no cap limit is ridiculous.

    • @davidswink6653
      @davidswink6653 Год назад

      I have worked 100s if not 1000s of NFIP flood claims
      There are fsr more flood damage from rivers than coastal
      Those tropical systems may hit Louisiana...but they flood the Tn Valley etc ...
      Rand Paul is wrong about how NFIP policy's work
      Thr NFIP def needs fixing ..thr biggest expense and waste in my book is the Vast bureaucracy in Washington
      There are so many levels of management..those claims are almost impossible to close
      Also coastal homes to be covered depending on thr zone they are in ..have to be built in certain ways ..Like on stilts etc....
      Thr worst most vast damage like I said is rhe that hit in thr 100 or 500 year flood plain and the river overflows
      Also Ron Paul mentions rhe avg price of a home
      Sale price is irrelevant
      You can have a 200 sq foot tiny home on a million dollar piece of land
      Insurance is all about what it take to repair or rebuild the covered structure and repair or replace covered contents ..
      I live on a lake more than half my house isn't covered by flood policy as 2 sides are considered under ground ...
      I have a very expensive property being lake front .. and kinda a nice house..but only part of it would covered per NFIP
      So if it was a million dollar property . Only about 150k in building is covered ...even the contents in my finished "basement" aren't covered
      But he is right about some homes being flooded over and over again ...
      Actually if your home is flooded twice you qualify for insurance money to have your home raised ...
      NFIP is sooo complicated ans the rules change depending on what type of flood zone you are in
      I think they need to extend the program but also need to clamp down and fix it
      Starting with rhe massive waste and corruption in fl
      NfIP is actually administered by 3rd parties...
      I retired 7 years ago so csnt name them
      But waste fraud and abuse are fsr more costly in rhis program than subsidizing rich people
      Another place they need to focus is Lenders forced placed flood insurance that robs policyholders outright
      Chase Manhattan the lender owns ( the largest shareholders) of the insurance company that administers the NFIP policy and also owns the company that determines if you are in a flood zone
      And they charge up to 10 times what a policy should be
      And in all my years of adjusting claims these beach front houses are typically damaged by both wind and flood....
      What happens is insurance company can manage the NFIP coverage as well so they pass as much damage to flood
      Its very complicated and works like it 1000 people just threw a piece of instruction in a pile and what wver order rhey pulled the pieces out is how they put it together

    • @davidswink6653
      @davidswink6653 Год назад +11

      Also there are specific rules covering 2nd homes on NFIP ...Primary and Secondary residences aren't treated rhe same AT all
      And most of those beach front 2nd homes are rentals and are treated as business...
      They aren't treated near rhe same as primary

    • @Chris-gf4jj
      @Chris-gf4jj Год назад +5

      ​@davidswink6653 that's a very good point 👉

    • @carmaela2689
      @carmaela2689 Год назад

      Insurance companies are one of the biggest flim flam operations in modern history! To go with Kennedy is basically caving in such a way that it looks like it is helping the common man, when really, it's helping insurance companies. He isn't standing for the working man, he's standing for greedy pig insurance companies. The same industry that wants to take your premiums for years and years and then fly a drone over your house and cancel it. The same industry that gets to decide whether you get life saving medication, rather than letting your doctor decide. They're terrible and they need checked!
      Thank you Rand Paul, for standing up. Smaller government, not subsidized "wealth"!

  • @Thelightwinsall
    @Thelightwinsall Год назад +2

    Rand Paul Great Speech !! That Represents The Taxpayers !!!
    Thank You!!!

  • @mzmartin8115
    @mzmartin8115 Год назад +277

    Rand Paul a voice of reason

    • @susanhannon7596
      @susanhannon7596 Год назад +9

      He almost always is - logical, articulate and rationale. Wish all of the Senators had his qualities

    • @Grushdevah
      @Grushdevah Год назад +8

      I wish his Dad was elected in 2012. The world would be so much better.

  • @LYLEWOLD
    @LYLEWOLD Год назад +7

    As much as I like Senator Kennedy, I am with Senator Paul on this one. There's no constitutional ground to tax someone for his neighbor's misfortune no matter how poor the neighbor is, so to say that We the taxpayers will subsidize *_anyone_* is already going above and beyond. Rand Paul is trying to cut fat, and Senator Kennedy is trying to keep the fat. Figure out what fair limits are and enact them, or scrap it altogether.

  • @mprice235
    @mprice235 Год назад +103

    I don't usually not agree with Kennedy but I think Paul makes a good point! A$500,000 house and must be primary home sounds fair.

    • @minnesnowtan9970
      @minnesnowtan9970 Год назад +1

      Do not usually not agree? What a classic double negative. This lack of clarity indicates muddled thinking.

    • @mprice235
      @mprice235 Год назад

      No what I meant was I usually agree with Kennedy but not with these statements.
      @@minnesnowtan9970

    • @jimwilliams7937
      @jimwilliams7937 Год назад

      With BidenFlation in 3 years that $500,000.00 will probably be $700,000.00.
      There should be an accounting for hyperinflation

  • @TheVaga9
    @TheVaga9 Год назад +3

    Rand is spot on with this!!

  • @stevesundt8605
    @stevesundt8605 Год назад +145

    Shrink the government.

    • @chaosad9754
      @chaosad9754 Год назад +4

      As a Federal employee, I agree.

    • @carlmorgan8452
      @carlmorgan8452 Год назад +2

      Great me too, and I've had this insurance forsed on me. Defund shrink government

    • @aeroAdvocate
      @aeroAdvocate Год назад +3

      By 70%!

    • @fjm1235
      @fjm1235 Год назад +2

      Yes! Abolish multiple agencies, not reform them.

    • @markovichglass
      @markovichglass Год назад +1

      "If it becomes destructive of these means it is the right of the people to Alter or abolish it.."

  • @bessiemorrison4804
    @bessiemorrison4804 Год назад +2

    If it’s over $250,000 then why can’t individuals pay for their own flood insurance?! 🙏🇺🇸

  • @MrPolymers
    @MrPolymers Год назад +71

    I own a second home in Florida and Rand is right. There are no poor folks on the SW Coast of Florida. My home is not in a flood zone. I pay for my flood insurance even though it's not likely to flood.

    • @lavadamorrison4569
      @lavadamorrison4569 Год назад +6

      Well I live in Louisiana and I pay for my flood insurance too, but a lot of private insurance companies won't write policies. By the way I live in a single wide mobile home and not a vacation home on the coast. I am also not in a flood zone but just two miles down the road is and the insurance is outrageous. Lower parishes in Louisiana are fishing towns and we get our seafood from these places. The fishing industry is vital to our economy here in these parishes and our state. People live in the coastal areas and park their boats and have homes down there, not vacation homes.

    • @jasonleveck8546
      @jasonleveck8546 Год назад +3

      @@lavadamorrison4569 I can see doing something for folks like yourself and an industry that is vital to a local/regional economy. I'm not for helping to rebuild folks who're already very wealthy and can float the cost themselves.

    • @eddiecaruth7704
      @eddiecaruth7704 Год назад +2

      @@lavadamorrison4569 The original poster Mr. Polymers doesn't care about your mobile home. His homeowner's insurance and his flood insurance, he freely pays, because he can afford it - - because he's likely rich or upper middle class, to fit Rand Paul's description, with MONEY - - his premiums alone, could buy you 5 trailers. The new FEMA algorithm that is driving up rates everywhere could skyrocket - - and Mr. Polymers would just pay it. The rest of us cannot afford THOUSAND dollar increases to our insurances. Nor can we afford these unaffordable increasing gas prices, groceries, etc. It's apples and oranges out there - - and people with MONEY cannot possibly understand what it is like to feel the squeeze from these higher rates that are making no sense.

    • @michaelmaniloff9297
      @michaelmaniloff9297 Год назад +1

      ​@lavadamorrison4569 the free market is dictating you should probably move. Tax payers should not pay the Bill because Louisiana is a troublesome state to live in, regarding Floods and natural disaster.

  • @goldismoney5899
    @goldismoney5899 Год назад +3

    Kennedy is wrong on this one. I thought he was smarter than this. Rand is right.

  • @royhoco5748
    @royhoco5748 Год назад +16

    I agree with Sen Paul

  • @Czjk293
    @Czjk293 Год назад +1

    I appreciate the debate thanks senators!

  • @morosleart852
    @morosleart852 Год назад +221

    I often admire Kennedy but I have to agree with Paul on this one. Humans have a brain , they should be left to use it, if you build your house on a flood plain take the risk that goes along with it

    • @OGbobbylocdogg
      @OGbobbylocdogg Год назад +8

      Common sense.

    • @No1karez
      @No1karez Год назад +8

      💯

    • @Bigfoothawk
      @Bigfoothawk Год назад +4

      Tell Florida that

    • @libertypastor1307
      @libertypastor1307 Год назад +12

      Amen!
      There's no law requiring anyone to build on a flood plain. So those who do, willfully choose to take that risk. No other American should have to pay for some other person's foolish, private decision!

    • @shafts2447
      @shafts2447 Год назад

      You agree with Kennedy escalating this proxy war? Sending billions of our tax money to Nazis in the Azov battalion?

  • @samsingh8151
    @samsingh8151 Год назад +8

    Kennedy is just acting the politician that he is ... basically, he agrees with Rand but some his cronies will be very unhappy with him if he does ... Way to go, Rand!

  • @dkjazzz
    @dkjazzz Год назад +52

    Thank you Sen Paul, we here in Kentucky consider you a treasure

    • @ProudKingAlexander
      @ProudKingAlexander Год назад

      Amen!

    • @georgias701
      @georgias701 Год назад +1

      Thank you, KY for putting him in the Senate!

    • @Mama-Ames
      @Mama-Ames Год назад

      Hard-working taxpaying Citizens here in Ohio & nationwide have great respect for Sen. Paul who is, in fact, a TREASURE; an intellectually honest voice of logic & common sense in the U.S. Senate, where it is so desperately needed, yet sadly, quite rare.
      Altho I respect Sen. Kennedy & often enjoy his unique style of communicating with Americans with his particular brand of wit & candor & his glorious sense of humor. But...
      Senator Paul, logic & common sense absolutely win this debate.
      Sen. Paul is 100% correct. The taxpayer-funded Federal Flood Insurance Program IS (and HAS LONG-BEEN) in DIRE NEED of reform.
      Thirty-Three TRILLION Sen. Kennedy!
      T H I R T Y . . . T H R E E . . .
      T R I L L I O N ! ! !
      Our Republic is out of time Sir.
      DC MUST... CUT... SPENDING.
      And you know it.
      The FFIP is a REASONABLE place TO START.
      For the sake of our innocent children & grandchildren...
      CUT... SPENDING...
      NOW.

    • @ProudKingAlexander
      @ProudKingAlexander Год назад

      Next to my votes for President Trump I consider my votes for Senator Paul to be my proudest moments.@@georgias701

  • @ToastvrYT
    @ToastvrYT Год назад +1

    Let it go! We can’t afford it.

  • @ajs4287
    @ajs4287 Год назад +78

    Kennedy whining about inflation while creating more inflation lol

  • @fmayer1507
    @fmayer1507 Год назад +3

    Rand Paul is on point. Outlaw any building in a flood zone. Rebuilding should be mandated in an area well out of a flood zone and no person that is wealthy should get any subsidies. Senator Paul's proposals are total common sense.

  • @docyoungblood9521
    @docyoungblood9521 Год назад +2

    John Kennedy is one of my favorites!
    I have never disagreed with anything he's said
    ...until now!!!
    why would a minimum wage employee need to subsidize a 2nd beach home?
    #FJB

    • @tonyamedsker213
      @tonyamedsker213 Год назад

      I feel EXACTLY like you do and have to say for the FIRST TIME SINCE IVE STARTED PAYING ATTENTION TO BOTH OF THESE MEN… I am shocked and disappointed in hearing Kennedy going so hard on something he wants US regular people to help fund… MANY NOT OWNING A HOME OF THEIR OWN LET ALONE 2!!! WTH?? 😔 THESE MUST BE FRIENDS OF HIS BECAUSE I CANT BELIEVE WHAT IM HEARING COME FROM HIM. He’s SUPPOSED TO BE ONE OF THE GOOD GUYS THAT DEFENDS ALL AMERICANS NOT TRY AND MAKE US GIVE MORE OF OUT POCKET $$$ KNOWING TIMES ARE SOOOO HARD ESPECIALLY RIGHT NOW!

  • @lycanwhisper2724
    @lycanwhisper2724 Год назад +76

    Shut the government down. Especially if it means Congress and Senate don't get paid! (since they gave themselves a raise).

    • @michaelhartley4273
      @michaelhartley4273 Год назад

      Congress still gets paid through a shutdown unfortunately. They made sure of it.

    • @johnhmielewski1230
      @johnhmielewski1230 Год назад

      This here is exactly why the greedy Democrats are so pissed off by the shutdown.

    • @jessj.j.french7482
      @jessj.j.french7482 Год назад +7

      Most regular people don't get paid for not showing up for a job or getting the job done so if they can't figure out this budget or any of that, and if they've been taking so many vacations, they should forget their paycheck and not receive back pay. A regular person not doing their job or showing up for it would get fired.

    • @lycanwhisper2724
      @lycanwhisper2724 Год назад +4

      @jessj.j.french7482 Yep. If I didn't show up or I didn't meet my deadlines , I would not have a job. I do wish I could "vote" myself a raise, tho. 😆

    • @1Mhoram9
      @1Mhoram9 Год назад +4

      They get paid everybody gets paid they all get a paid vacation.

  • @ThePoehladian
    @ThePoehladian Год назад +3

    Theres nothing bad that government cant make worse.
    GET TF OUT OF OUR WAY !!

  • @gatekeeper7792
    @gatekeeper7792 Год назад +37

    Here is a novel concept...Put a cap on the insurance. That way everyone gets to have their insurance . If someone who has a multi million dollar home and wants "additional" insurance, then sell it to them. Just like I have aflac to supplement my insurance at my expense, let them buy supplemental insurance at their expense.

  • @EdMcF1
    @EdMcF1 Год назад +4

    I stand with Rand on this one. Venice has lasted over 1,400 years without a national food insurance programme, they build around the problem.

    • @eddiecaruth7704
      @eddiecaruth7704 Год назад

      Venice, Italy is on a land locked sea - - not subjected to ocean going category 5 hurricanes.

  • @brucemistaken2437
    @brucemistaken2437 Год назад +26

    100% right. Rand Paul, way to go!!

  • @ccampbell7214
    @ccampbell7214 Год назад +1

    Fix it today!!!!

  • @Robert-sj7pr
    @Robert-sj7pr Год назад +12

    If you can afford a second home and it happens to be in a flood area. You take the risk NOT me.

  • @michaelatwaoi7876
    @michaelatwaoi7876 Год назад +2

    Gee I thought I'd never hear Sen Kennedy be anything but solidly sane... His performance today blew away that expectation totally... Rand was on target as always.. Thank you Rand for that decent amendment --accomplished cleverly with just two logical limits on coverage.
    TTYL

  • @sandraelder1101
    @sandraelder1101 Год назад +42

    “Buy your own d’d insurance for your beach house!” Exactly!

    • @glitch-pr3nr
      @glitch-pr3nr Год назад

      Or not😂🎉

    • @nancysalerno7036
      @nancysalerno7036 Год назад

      Yes! I can’t even afford to go to the beach. Too busy maintaining my own home. If you buy a house on sand etc. it is on you.

  • @randywilliams9531
    @randywilliams9531 Год назад +1

    Senator Kennedy is my kind of legislator he's got a really big pair. We need more of that

  • @jeanisaac7006
    @jeanisaac7006 Год назад +62

    Rand Paul is the voice of reason.

    • @Rick-bi9fw
      @Rick-bi9fw Год назад

      Funny how Kennedy pretends to be a regular guy but want the poor to subsidize the rich. He's full of rich.

  • @peterclemmins7099
    @peterclemmins7099 Год назад +1

    It always amazes me the places people decide to build houses, but now I understand why.

  • @9879SigmundS
    @9879SigmundS Год назад +18

    Lost some respect for Kennedy after hearing this debate.

  • @mrhood3977
    @mrhood3977 Год назад +3

    They both give good arguments so cap at average home value across the board $500k and if you can't rebuild at that then the rest should come out of your pocket

  • @jimolson8424
    @jimolson8424 Год назад +15

    I have been to Louisiana many times.
    People in flood plains build homes with deep footings with tall poles way above flood levels.
    If you are on the coast line.
    You have got to know you are in harm's way..

  • @trentaston3784
    @trentaston3784 Год назад +1

    Gotta stand with Rand on this one.

  • @mzmartin8115
    @mzmartin8115 Год назад +52

    Hey Kennedy maybe if you weren't voting to send money to Ukraine we could afford your insurance

  • @ralphjessee2688
    @ralphjessee2688 Год назад +1

    Sen. Rand makes many excellent points.

  • @richardherring8220
    @richardherring8220 Год назад +24

    Kennedy shows his RINO influence in Congress my opinion of Kennedy is changing !!

    • @jasonleveck8546
      @jasonleveck8546 Год назад +5

      I agree with Paul, since I have known this family for years and was a huge supporter of his awesome Father. I do see Kennedy's point, in relation to the coastal areas of his constituents. Different than S/N Carolina, Florida and places similar. This should be an issue of these states with this problem coming together with one another and creating their own insurance pool. This should not be a national program.

    • @sc100ott
      @sc100ott Год назад +2

      I’m with Rand Paul on this, but Kennedy is obligated to advocate for his state in this regard, even if he knows this goes against general conservative principles.

  • @tomgooch1422
    @tomgooch1422 Год назад +3

    Senator Rand is right on, as usual. Flood Insurance is another beltway spending lamb now grown into a fat sacred cow. If you build anything, a hut or mansion, in either the flood plain of a great river or on an ocean coast long-known to be visited by great sea storms, you're at risk. Don't put your hand in my pocket for protection from your folly.

  • @strooomon
    @strooomon Год назад +236

    Rand Paul seems to be the only person in government that has any sense of what this country is about. Thank you Rand Paul.

    • @ravaz1
      @ravaz1 Год назад

      He is a good actor, for sure

    • @sweethome2363
      @sweethome2363 Год назад +12

      Thank his Father too. Ron Paul

    • @sweethome2363
      @sweethome2363 Год назад +3

      @@ravaz1are u Islamic?

    • @sweethome2363
      @sweethome2363 Год назад +3

      @@ravaz1like closet islamic bho?

    • @ravaz1
      @ravaz1 Год назад

      @@sweethome2363 no

  • @helendavis9787
    @helendavis9787 Год назад +1

    I love Sen. Kennedy but, this time I'm agreeing with Sen. Paul. I live in a studio apt at over $700 a month. Why should I pay for someones second home when I don't even have 1 home?

  • @geraldmorris7803
    @geraldmorris7803 Год назад +12

    Paul is right, Kennedy is wrong on this issue IMO.

  • @MrBob121582
    @MrBob121582 Год назад +14

    Kennedy is out of his mind. If you can afford two Homes or a half million dollar home then you don't need government help

  • @savvydirtfarmer
    @savvydirtfarmer Год назад +51

    If the govt shuts down the first money to be frozen should be the salaries of all lawmakers, without backpay, when the govt re-opens. Among their first responsibilities is to function... even if that function is dysfunctional.

    • @royhoco5748
      @royhoco5748 Год назад +4

      I totally agree with you

    • @Awayhavingfun
      @Awayhavingfun Год назад +5

      Agreed 100%

    • @zatoichi3652
      @zatoichi3652 Год назад +10

      Nope! Shut it down until we can get all parties to agree to get OUR house (America ) back in order and under control. This is an opportunity to clean house of ALL wasteful spending and get our priorities straight. America first!

    • @thubandra963
      @thubandra963 Год назад

      Congress will be paid. Like a bank during war, win or lose, the bank will get it's due.

    • @jeffreyscott7126
      @jeffreyscott7126 Год назад +4

      It's already dysfunctional. Shut it down until common sense comes back into the house.

  • @justoguillermomontoya3821
    @justoguillermomontoya3821 Год назад +1

    Subsidizing the risks of living in a flood plain is a moral hazard

  • @peacefulpatriots
    @peacefulpatriots Год назад +10

    I USUALLY love what Mr Kennedy proposes. Not this time

  • @chrissavage1534
    @chrissavage1534 Год назад +2

    Both of these guys are great.

  • @charlottegoebel8774
    @charlottegoebel8774 Год назад +48

    If the houses in LA are not vacation mansions, then they won't be affected by Rand's amendment. Love Kennedy, but Rand is correct.

    • @davidevans6103
      @davidevans6103 Год назад +1

      "Rahht smaack daab inn-damidahla HUURRRACEAANEUH seaaaasoneh"
      - Senator John Kennedy

    • @theoryofpersonality1420
      @theoryofpersonality1420 Год назад

      Rand lives in Kentucky so he doesn't care about those who don't. Just wait till rivers flood then he will care.

  • @clearvision4641
    @clearvision4641 Год назад +3

    Rand Paul has a good head on his shoulders true American Patriot

  • @darrellmay4502
    @darrellmay4502 Год назад +11

    I don't say this often about Rand Paul but He is right this time around!

  • @thatsthejobbb8587
    @thatsthejobbb8587 Год назад +3

    Nobody reads between the lines like Rand Paul. How fantastic would it be if he ran for president?! Of the people, by the people and for the people!!

    • @ProudKingAlexander
      @ProudKingAlexander Год назад +1

      He ran in 2016 but President Trump was unbeatable. I would support Rand Paul in 2028.

  • @mmsk2010
    @mmsk2010 Год назад +6

    I'm with Sen. Paul on this one.

  • @christopherramos6028
    @christopherramos6028 Год назад +1

    I agree with Sen. Rand Paul.

  • @user-hz7kv6js6l
    @user-hz7kv6js6l Год назад +5

    Shut it down and get rid of McCarthy.

  • @studioelon
    @studioelon Год назад +2

    Paul is 💯 correct! It's not beholden to the tax payers to help others that are better off than themselves.

  • @rodcox1304
    @rodcox1304 Год назад +84

    I agree with Rand Paul. We need more people like him , common sense.

  • @SAC786
    @SAC786 Год назад

    ❤❤❤from NJ and I agree with SENATOR RAND🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼

  • @Phone-sh7jg
    @Phone-sh7jg Год назад +7

    1 trillion to Ukraine. Stop the insanity

  • @MajorieMalue-t1y
    @MajorieMalue-t1y Год назад +1

    What about the people who cannot afford a home and are taxpayers? Why do we have to pay others insurance?

  • @rbyham
    @rbyham Год назад +6

    Typically Kennedy is much wiser than this. His position on this makes me reevaluate the many times I have thought him wise. Paul is absolutely right. Compromise on the thresholds but no second homes of anyone and no unlimited levels of replacement.

    • @isNATOWorthIt
      @isNATOWorthIt Год назад

      Remember that he is a Louisiana Representative. This is good for his constituents, if not for the rest of the country.

  • @dianak0691
    @dianak0691 Год назад +4

    I gotta go with Sen. Rand on this one that there should be limits on who gets help through FEMA. I also understand the point that Sen Kennedy is trying to make that people who do have 2nd homes may not have any way to insure their homes through private insurance due to such short notice. I agree that it’s wrong to burden the tax payer with the expenses to rebuild over and over again in flood zones.

    • @rozalinarozalina2188
      @rozalinarozalina2188 Год назад

      Absolutely waste of money to rebuild in areas that are often flooded .

  • @nancylaporte5021
    @nancylaporte5021 Год назад +11

    I had to buy my own flood insurance at $1,400 yr. Out of that, I had a deductible of $4,000 to pay up front before they fixed anything. If you just bought all new appliances and a new furnace, they still only covered about 1/2. That was my personal residence, not a second home or a home where there's it's hurricane prone.

    • @allanfranklin9615
      @allanfranklin9615 Год назад +2

      You found out the truth: insurance is the biggest scam in the country. If you file a claim for damages, subject to your deductible, repair your home to better condition than it was, the insurance company will cancel your policy. No other insurance company will insure you because you've had a claim in the past 5 years, leaving you to find an alternative company to issue a policy at a 30% increase in premium for three years (if you have no claims). Insurance makes money by taking your money and not paying out in claims. I know this from personal experience.

    • @kerirae4777
      @kerirae4777 Год назад

      The problem is with the damn insurance companies!!!

  • @catherinequigley569
    @catherinequigley569 Год назад +2

    Louisiana has a lot of flooding in the canals and swamps of the state. Some of those places are little more than shacks. Florida gets flooding in the interior of the state also. But I agree with Paul. If you can afford a high dollar home then the taxpayer shouldn't have to pay for it.

  • @terrancewilliamson6194
    @terrancewilliamson6194 Год назад +4

    Two Awesome Senators debating. Rand has always been my fav though!