Our approach to vaccine development was fine until money got in the way. Public trust in health care has gone out the window. Now not only are covid vaccines almost taboo but questions are being raised by all the others that have been developed which may in fact explain some anomalies that we haven't been able to explain in the past. As for our politicians well!!!
Thank you for sharing your perspective-many people share similar concerns. The rapid vaccine rollout during COVID-19 highlighted the tension between public health goals and commercial interests, and it’s understandable that this has shaken trust in healthcare. You’re right that this distrust is now extending to other vaccines and public health measures, raising questions that deserve honest answers. Transparency and accountability are the only ways to rebuild public confidence. As for politicians, their role in health decisions has often complicated the narrative, and it’s clear we need more evidence-based, apolitical leadership in these matters.
Please, Sir Expert, there are even more important questions about the mRNA vaccines: could those vaccined transfer their produced anti-Sars molecules to the not-vaccined, thereby exposing them to all the risks of the vaccine without its (in the long term questionable) benefits? Veritatis Missio
About half of the vaccines given in Brazil were not with mNRA (AZ, Sinovac and Johnson were the remaining vaccines). You cannot draw conclusions about mRNA vaccines from a study in Brazil.
You're absolutely right, science thrives on continuous improvement and the willingness to acknowledge and address potential shortcomings. Open, transparent discussions about any challenges in health intervention tools, including vaccines, are critical to advancing public health and maintaining trust in scientific processes. The identification of potential long-term risks in specific subgroups emphasizes the essential need for vigilance, adaptability, and transparency in healthcare strategies. Vaccines have been indispensable in mitigating severe illness and saving lives. However, as we navigate the post-pandemic era, it is crucial to broaden our focus to include holistic and personalized care for those who endured severe illness. Science is a dynamic process that requires constant reflection and improvement. If potential issues arise with health intervention tools, they must be openly discussed and rigorously studied to inform better solutions. This approach ensures that immediate and long-term health needs are met while maintaining public trust in both vaccination efforts and the broader scientific community. Open dialogue and a commitment to progress strengthen our collective ability to respond to emerging health challenges effectively.
Are we monitoring the general population for the same thing, that being the long term risk of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated? this is obviously one specific group we are paying attention to, but are there other groups?
Thank you for sharing your feedback. We understand the animated captions may not be everyone’s favorite style, but we use them to make sure our content is accessible for all viewers-whether they’re watching in a noisy environment, have difficulty hearing, or simply prefer to read along. We appreciate you letting us know how you feel, and we’re always open to exploring new ways to improve our videos. Thanks again for watching and taking the time to comment!
@@medheads To me they are very distracting, so detracting from the message rather than enhancing it. You could ensure that captions are available for those who have issues, which would not force it on everyone. Hope this helps.
Who would have thought messing with people's immune systems might possibly mess up their immune system??
Our approach to vaccine development was fine until money got in the way. Public trust in health care has gone out the window. Now not only are covid vaccines almost taboo but questions are being raised by all the others that have been developed which may in fact explain some anomalies that we haven't been able to explain in the past. As for our politicians well!!!
Thank you for sharing your perspective-many people share similar concerns. The rapid vaccine rollout during COVID-19 highlighted the tension between public health goals and commercial interests, and it’s understandable that this has shaken trust in healthcare.
You’re right that this distrust is now extending to other vaccines and public health measures, raising questions that deserve honest answers. Transparency and accountability are the only ways to rebuild public confidence. As for politicians, their role in health decisions has often complicated the narrative, and it’s clear we need more evidence-based, apolitical leadership in these matters.
Please, Sir Expert, there are even more important questions about the mRNA vaccines: could those vaccined transfer their produced anti-Sars molecules to the not-vaccined, thereby exposing them to all the risks of the vaccine without its (in the long term questionable) benefits? Veritatis Missio
About half of the vaccines given in Brazil were not with mNRA (AZ, Sinovac and Johnson were the remaining vaccines). You cannot draw conclusions about mRNA vaccines from a study in Brazil.
Just heard of a patient with sudden shutting down of organ systems which they diagnosed as long term Covid
LOL 💉💉💉💉💉
Shout out to all of the remaining pure bloods!
Boosters, we need Boosters.
😂😂😂❤🎉
@@OswaldJames-x2t We need also masks,
double masks are best.
@jedadruled984 😄😄👍❤️
Did you watch it? What we need is proper transparent research, which now seems to be finally coming out
@@medheads They don't want the truth to be told.
Asking tough questions is not allowed anymore.
true....asking ANY questions, is a crime now....
So where is the link to the study???
Apologies, www.frontiersin.org/journals/medicine/articles/10.3389/fmed.2024.1495428/full and now added to description
You're absolutely right, science thrives on continuous improvement and the willingness to acknowledge and address potential shortcomings. Open, transparent discussions about any challenges in health intervention tools, including vaccines, are critical to advancing public health and maintaining trust in scientific processes.
The identification of potential long-term risks in specific subgroups emphasizes the essential need for vigilance, adaptability, and transparency in healthcare strategies. Vaccines have been indispensable in mitigating severe illness and saving lives. However, as we navigate the post-pandemic era, it is crucial to broaden our focus to include holistic and personalized care for those who endured severe illness.
Science is a dynamic process that requires constant reflection and improvement. If potential issues arise with health intervention tools, they must be openly discussed and rigorously studied to inform better solutions. This approach ensures that immediate and long-term health needs are met while maintaining public trust in both vaccination efforts and the broader scientific community. Open dialogue and a commitment to progress strengthen our collective ability to respond to emerging health challenges effectively.
IT'S CALLED NUREMBERG
Are we monitoring the general population for the same thing, that being the long term risk of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated?
this is obviously one specific group we are paying attention to, but are there other groups?
No, no data is being collected, by pharma or governments. To collect data would show the devastating harms.
Those subtitles are very annoying.
Thank you for sharing your feedback. We understand the animated captions may not be everyone’s favorite style, but we use them to make sure our content is accessible for all viewers-whether they’re watching in a noisy environment, have difficulty hearing, or simply prefer to read along. We appreciate you letting us know how you feel, and we’re always open to exploring new ways to improve our videos. Thanks again for watching and taking the time to comment!
@@medheads To me they are very distracting, so detracting from the message rather than enhancing it. You could ensure that captions are available for those who have issues, which would not force it on everyone. Hope this helps.
I find them very useful, thank you. 😊👍💙
Dr Vandenbosche wrote a whole book on this just a few years ago.
Doesn't need orange hi light
I haven't seen any benefit from this vaccine
The question is a rhetoric one, isn't it?😂
❤❤❤❤❤😂😂😂😂i am glad i was an antivaxer. ❤❤❤❤😂😂
And still is👍
CAUSE ITS ABOUT SCIENCE ?