- for digging trenches, canals and underground tanks - for study geological structure of the earth by registering reflection of the shock wave - for mining (examples: Butan - 5 nukes in 1980, Dnepr-1 in 1972-09-04, Dnepr-2 in 1984, Grifon - 2 nukes in 1969, Geliy - 5 nukes in 1981-1987, etc)
Its not...it is a scale test to study how nukes can be used to help with digging operations. But it could be a nuke if placed deep enough, and they can control the size of explosions ;]
@crockigater2 einstein actually worked on making the atomic bomb and a nuclear energy plant for the nazis and after the war was over he defected to the US and joined the manhatten project to make the atomic bomb that would help end the US-Japanese part of the war
they disproved that faster-than-light theory?! lol i didnt know that..im interested in that stuff (im still in high school and out textbooks are a bit out of date) can u send the article with that??
People have matured. Remember, this was back in a time that people also waged wars simply because they felt like it. They didn't need an excuse, because nobody really cared about why, they just cared they were getting attacked. And I would try to come up with a logical response to your last sentence had it made sense itself. But seeing as that's not the case, I will just disregard or hope for a clearification. Btw, do you really think that art in the Renaissance held us back? Honestly?
@snehesten It's hard to say, but you don't have to look much further than the suppression of Copernicus' and Galileo's work to see just how much Christianity held us back. I mean, the inspiration people had when they found out we were not the center of the universe was huge. But because that belief helped strengthen their religious points of view it was forbid to be challenged. That inspiration could have come much sooner.
Maybe not an idiot, but he has been proved wrong. For example, already disproved is the theory that nothing can move faster than light. And I don't think his understanding of quantum theory was up to much. Lots of stuff to debate if you ave half a mind available.
@SmokiSounds Supernatural, magical, now that's an argument for pure semantics. You can argue for a reasonable need for a creator, but then common. But the logic fails when you realize the creator then had to be created.
@MontajBlaze But the logic does not fail in the other explanations. There is no premise for the universe having to be created in science. Only in religion, so only religion has to hold true to that. If they say that it had to be created, and then saying that's why there is a god. Then they are breaking their own logic. Science just says that this universe was probably created from a single, expanding point. Which is backed up by evaluation, It does not say there is or isn't a god.
See, people would actually give a second thought to your opinions if you presented them in something resembling the English language, or any other language currently in use for that matter.
@MontajBlaze I'm trying to ascertain the meaning ( implicit and explicit) of what you said. I think you are trying to say 2 things at the same time. A god is possible, because its not impossible, hell look at the universe even if there isn't a god, something must have always been, right ( at least I think that's one thing you're saying). And There must have been something to start this universe.
@SlyNine Then logic fails in all the other possible explanations to. The others are "X" action/cycle had to be initiated at some point. See? Don't see why it's so hard to believe in an infinite existance as logically possible for one system and for others beside it(theoretically, and not simultaneously). BTW, I'm not trying to "win" you over, it's just I'm pointing out something I realized long ago.
It's been changed, because science unlike religion allows for discovery, Science is men trying to understand the universe, where religion is man trying to create what they want to believe. If you don't believe in science practice, method, or theory. Turn off your computer because at one time it was and was created by that. See unlike religion, science is there in our every day lives, not a fiction being that we want to believe in.
Thier are so many problems with that, I dont even know where to begin, But its really a pile of crap. Really, So because you say thier is a god, it is so? Because we don't live up to your high standard, we are not prosperous? Science may not tell you their is a magic being in the sky that will make everything alright. But at least it has done something to actually improve and extend humans lives, and it doesn't take "belief" to see the effects of science.
As I have stated in our other conversation (which you may or may not have already read my response) look at my point about fossils, about carbon dating, and about the overall age of the earth. If anyone else has any questions, feel free to send me a message.
- for digging trenches, canals and underground tanks
- for study geological structure of the earth by registering reflection of the shock wave
- for mining (examples: Butan - 5 nukes in 1980, Dnepr-1 in 1972-09-04, Dnepr-2 in 1984, Grifon - 2 nukes in 1969, Geliy - 5 nukes in 1981-1987, etc)
according to Wiki in the 1965-1988 USA makes 27 (33) geological nuclear explosions and USSR 124 (169)
is this after effects? very nicely done
That isn't looking like an atomic explosion, there are many detonations in nearly the same time.
We can use it in Mining to extract RARE-Heavy Metals used in advanced Aircraft or spaceship.
@Thebrowntown1234 that wasn't an atomic blast just a series of bombs detonated around the same time.
Interesting that there was no visible shock wave.
I see...I saw some pictures of Cerenkov Radiation...the pale blue looks pretty lol..
@SlyNine I guess you are a real scientist and you know it all
Its not...it is a scale test to study how nukes can be used to help with digging operations. But it could be a nuke if placed deep enough, and they can control the size of explosions ;]
@crockigater2 einstein actually worked on making the atomic bomb and a nuclear energy plant for the nazis and after the war was over he defected to the US and joined the manhatten project to make the atomic bomb that would help end the US-Japanese part of the war
it looks like a big TNT explosion
they disproved that faster-than-light theory?! lol i didnt know that..im interested in that stuff (im still in high school and out textbooks are a bit out of date) can u send the article with that??
People have matured. Remember, this was back in a time that people also waged wars simply because they felt like it. They didn't need an excuse, because nobody really cared about why, they just cared they were getting attacked. And I would try to come up with a logical response to your last sentence had it made sense itself. But seeing as that's not the case, I will just disregard or hope for a clearification.
Btw, do you really think that art in the Renaissance held us back? Honestly?
are they testig the use of nuclear bomb as an earth moving device like the sedan event?
look at all that fallout :x
i guess thats how they get rid of gophers over there...
does anybody know what the diameter of an atomic blast such as that one would be? thanks.
Of course you do, We are here are we not, Problem is that same "proof" also proves that this is just some cosmic random event.
lol my friend and me are watching this and he just yelled out
'SUPERRR SAYIANNN'
@snehesten It's hard to say, but you don't have to look much further than the suppression of Copernicus' and Galileo's work to see just how much Christianity held us back. I mean, the inspiration people had when they found out we were not the center of the universe was huge. But because that belief helped strengthen their religious points of view it was forbid to be challenged.
That inspiration could have come much sooner.
Sound?
@libbern if i recall, einstein laid down the formulas years earlier that made oppenheimers work possible
Maybe not an idiot, but he has been proved wrong.
For example, already disproved is the theory that nothing can move faster than light.
And I don't think his understanding of quantum theory was up to much.
Lots of stuff to debate if you ave half a mind available.
@SmokiSounds Supernatural, magical, now that's an argument for pure semantics.
You can argue for a reasonable need for a creator, but then common. But the logic fails when you realize the creator then had to be created.
thats just me takeing a shit after tacos
@MontajBlaze But the logic does not fail in the other explanations.
There is no premise for the universe having to be created in science. Only in religion, so only religion has to hold true to that. If they say that it had to be created, and then saying that's why there is a god. Then they are breaking their own logic.
Science just says that this universe was probably created from a single, expanding point. Which is backed up by evaluation, It does not say there is or isn't a god.
See, people would actually give a second thought to your opinions if you presented them in something resembling the English language, or any other language currently in use for that matter.
@MontajBlaze I'm trying to ascertain the meaning ( implicit and explicit) of what you said. I think you are trying to say 2 things at the same time.
A god is possible, because its not impossible, hell look at the universe even if there isn't a god, something must have always been, right ( at least I think that's one thing you're saying). And There must have been something to start this universe.
@SlyNine Then logic fails in all the other possible explanations to. The others are "X" action/cycle had to be initiated at some point. See? Don't see why it's so hard to believe in an infinite existance as logically possible for one system and for others beside it(theoretically, and not simultaneously).
BTW, I'm not trying to "win" you over, it's just I'm pointing out something I realized long ago.
American nukes Fuck Yeah !
It's been changed, because science unlike religion allows for discovery, Science is men trying to understand the universe, where religion is man trying to create what they want to believe.
If you don't believe in science practice, method, or theory. Turn off your computer because at one time it was and was created by that. See unlike religion, science is there in our every day lives, not a fiction being that we want to believe in.
Thier are so many problems with that, I dont even know where to begin, But its really a pile of crap. Really, So because you say thier is a god, it is so? Because we don't live up to your high standard, we are not prosperous?
Science may not tell you their is a magic being in the sky that will make everything alright. But at least it has done something to actually improve and extend humans lives, and it doesn't take "belief" to see the effects of science.
plowshare
LOL
As I have stated in our other conversation (which you may or may not have already read my response) look at my point about fossils, about carbon dating, and about the overall age of the earth.
If anyone else has any questions, feel free to send me a message.
That looks more like a line of conventional explosives than an underground bomb.
I don't believe I subscribe to this "reality" you speak of.
The only one???
a happy face