Tap to unmute

Why did the last US-Russia nuclear arms treaty lapse? | Inside Story

Share
Embed
  • Published on Mar 14, 2026
  • For more than five decades, nuclear arms control treaties were in force between Russia and the US- until this week. The last agreement has been allowed to lapse - without a new one to replace it. So, why has this happened - and what are the dangers?
    Presenter: Tom McRae
    Guests:
    Thomas Countryman - former US Assistant Secretary of State for International Security and Non-Proliferation under the Obama administration.
    Rebecca E Johnson - Co-founding first President of the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons.
    Nikolai Sokov - Senior Fellow at the Vienna Center for Disarmament and Non-Proliferation.
    Subscribe to our channel: bit.ly/AJSubscribe
    Follow us on Twitter: / ajenglish
    Find us on Facebook: / aljazeera
    Check our website: www.aljazeera.com/
    Check out our Instagram page: / aljazeeraenglish
    Download AJE Mobile App: aje.io/AJEMobile
    #NuclearArms #ArmsControl #USRussia #NuclearTreaty #ColdWarLegacy #GlobalSecurity #NuclearWeapons #ArmsRace #StrategicStability #InternationalSecurity #AlJazeeraEnglish

Comments •

  • @GeraldMantel
    @GeraldMantel Month ago +6

    Mighty Terror : "Why would mankind make weapons to destroy mankind?" (1954)

    • @EuroUser1
      @EuroUser1 Month ago +3

      Because mankind is not one being with a unified interest. Many humans want to kill others or, at least, make credible threats to do so, in order to extract concessions.

  • @AGASoftware
    @AGASoftware Month ago +9

    absolute nonsense. just say the truth - US refused to sign. that's the reason this deal has lapsed

  • @GeraldMantel
    @GeraldMantel Month ago +3

    A great, enlightening discussion about all that will not happen ....

  • @MatAndreoDeLara
    @MatAndreoDeLara Month ago +3

    Nuclear warheads must be destroyed or be disarmed..it could destroy mankind, and the world..we must be a nuclear weapons free world, life is precious, why destroy it..

  • @LordBaileyDEV
    @LordBaileyDEV Month ago +1

    There is no victory in Nuclear War only the death of everyone.
    No one wins except the rocks.

  • @WRESTLING-h1m
    @WRESTLING-h1m Month ago

    When journalists ask them questions, they wonder why they don't hear the answer to the end

  • @GeraldMantel
    @GeraldMantel Month ago +5

    We'll sign a "No First Strike" agreement with other countries then race them to see who can do it, first.

  • @MncedisiFulani-e6w

    Weapons of mass destruction that's dangerous weapons..

  • @EuroUser1
    @EuroUser1 Month ago +2

    'Nuclear weapons are a very bad way to deter a nuclear attack'. OK. What is the good way, then?

    • @DrScott666
      @DrScott666 Month ago

      Not building them 🤦‍♂️

    • @EuroUser1
      @EuroUser1 Month ago

      @DrScott666 That strategy totally failed for Japan. Not having built any nuclear bomb themselves, they suffered two nuclear attacks.

  • @IbrahimOlayemi-z4u

    Wishing from Germany 🇩🇪 ✨️

  • @emmanuelxavier2636
    @emmanuelxavier2636 Month ago +1

    Middle East is primed for inferno! Gulf states are going to be the victims. Capital flight from the region is massively underway. Today’s prosperous GCC Nations will come to utter destruction, kind of what is happening like in the other affected regions there. Iran in effect declared war, not warning. Any misstep by US or Israel will trigger the mother of all wars in the Middle East. First American bases followed by GCC cities and installations as war fury ignites restraint will give way to vengeance! Who can save the situation? Only US and Iran themselves! Ratcheting up war cry from both sides must stop. Common sense must prevail. Loud mouthing and blackmail from Trump and Israel must immediately stop. Stich the mouth of both. Iran is reciprocating the threats rather than initiating. China and Russia will back up Iran with all their might because this is the opportunity both were waiting. Bogging down US in the Middle East will make China’s dream realize in Taiwan. Where are the American think-tanks and intelligence at work? Decisions from DC is not intelligence and strategic based but emotional and impulsive outbursts! Dangerous to think!!!

  • @SkSamimAli-g6k
    @SkSamimAli-g6k Month ago +2

    Nuclear dangerous for all world

  • @VivianKreimer
    @VivianKreimer Month ago +1

    WHY KENNEDY. WAS. ASSASSINATED BY THE CIA ?

  • @RiWi-w3p
    @RiWi-w3p Month ago

    Noore restraint on gog in ezeKiel 38 or four angels horse and riders of the Euphrates of revelation 9:13-19. Resurrection and ascension 31/2 days after destruction of city mentioned in revelation 11:3-12/ destruction of usa as per Daniel 11:45& Jeremiah 51 aka BRICS/ Iran hitting usa.

  • @HassanRageIbrahim
    @HassanRageIbrahim Month ago

    The world nuclear Giants(Russia and US) are drunk with power , Nuclear weapons offers nothing other than terror and wiping out of earth civilisation. Earth is the play ground of our children and their children. We cannot allow it to be the play ground of the nuclear arms of the evil forces.

  • @pk3778
    @pk3778 Month ago +1

    AJ is NOT banned in Moscow---why always give their viewership western opinions in partinent issues, are it's qatari owners that much in bed with the west...???

  • @AlohaAmigo
    @AlohaAmigo Month ago +1

    The reason the USA lapsed it is because they’re too concerned about Israelis problem. Smh.

    • @califomia
      @califomia Month ago

      New START lapsed mainly because of U.S.-Russia breakdown and Moscow’s suspension, not Israel. Any Israel-related concern would have been indirect-at most reinforcing a general desire for maximum nuclear flexibility amid global instability, including Iran’s nuclear trajectory and its implications for Israel-rather than a primary driver of the decision.

  • @syedmaricar9946
    @syedmaricar9946 Month ago

    Nuclear weapons nations will never be attacked by Americans or Russians North Korea knows too well ,after libya ,Syria, Afghanistan, iraq.

  • @DonLeinfelder
    @DonLeinfelder Month ago

    If you people think that packed meant anything you're crazy. You lost me think you can trust Russia and China. Or I ran. Know that stuff means anything when it comes down to it.😮

  • @califomia
    @califomia Month ago

    The world needs to put max pressure on China to stop this buildup and sign a treaty. I do not want to see global stockpiles increased by another third.

  • @gh926-e8s
    @gh926-e8s Month ago

    Looking at the relationships between Trump Putin and Xi visiting each other. Xi actually invited both Trump and Putin to visit Beijing in April. It doesn’t look like they will start launching nuclear strikes at each other!

  • @sheenafrancisco3458

    US has small warheads neither china

    • @califomia
      @califomia Month ago

      False. The U.S. has ~3,700 nuclear warheads (about 1,700 deployed), which is more than enough to destroy all major cities, collapse global civilization, and cause catastrophic climate effects (“nuclear winter”)

  • @AmazingChannelL
    @AmazingChannelL Month ago

    Stupid US use nuclear bomb.. cannot use nuclear weapons in the world

  • @ResolverResolver
    @ResolverResolver Month ago

    The cause and foundation of the problem is Italy and France Paris, Torino Taranto Sardegna Napoli Napolitano's America Rome?!!;

    • @califomia
      @califomia Month ago

      France, as an independent nuclear power, is sometimes cited by Russia as evidence that U.S.-Russia limits ignore other nuclear states, while Italy, as a NATO non-nuclear state hosting U.S. nuclear weapons under sharing arrangements, factors into broader NATO-Russia tensions. But these are background arguments, not drivers-the treaty’s collapse was overwhelmingly about U.S.-Russia relations, trust, verification, and the Ukraine war.

  • @jackchid6040
    @jackchid6040 Month ago

    With China, India, Pakistan and NK not being part of those treaties it is in neither the US nor Russia's interest to continue with them.

    • @califomia
      @califomia Month ago

      The USA and Russia have no reason to develop additional nuclear warheads when they both already possess the capacity to blow up every major US city in the world. They should lead by example while trying to be diplomatic with additional countries.

  • @ResolverResolver
    @ResolverResolver Month ago +1

    God bless Russian, Glory to Russian in Jesus Mighty Name Amen, Salam Alaikum, wa Alaikum Salaam!!!

  • @Taufiq-sb3hi
    @Taufiq-sb3hi 29 days ago

    For me, no country must posses nuclear weapons.

  • @CK-jo9im
    @CK-jo9im Month ago

    It looks like Trump thinks that building more inventory to surpass Russia nuclear arsenal makes the world safer. The world has already inventory to blow everything up 100 times over.

  • @TimothyEarns-b8e
    @TimothyEarns-b8e Month ago

    Because the USA is in the process of collapsing the way the Soviet Union did so how can countries that have collapsed sign any kind of nuclear deal

    • @califomia
      @califomia Month ago

      Collapsed? The U.S. military budget is so outsized it borders on absurd: the United States spends more than the next several countries combined, dwarfing allies and adversaries alike, while already possessing overwhelming conventional and nuclear superiority. It’s less about defense at this point and more about inertia, politics, and a defense-industrial ecosystem that keeps growing regardless of actual security needs-especially jarring when compared to chronic underfunding of infrastructure, healthcare, and education at home.

  • @SUBASHKUMAR-wz8zx
    @SUBASHKUMAR-wz8zx Month ago

    😀😂😂😂😂 putler 100000 times repeat use nuclear weapons against NATO and USA now crying about USA not signing this deal extension lol

  • @SUBASHKUMAR-wz8zx
    @SUBASHKUMAR-wz8zx Month ago

    Good for Russia and USA

  • @DrScott666
    @DrScott666 Month ago

    Great👍 Can we just please hurry up and start WW3 already?

  • @VivianKreimer
    @VivianKreimer Month ago

    I TOTALLY disagree
    THE USA. HAS. 750. MILITARES BASES. AROUND THE GLOBE WITH. HOW MANY NUKES ??????? NOBODY KNOWS
    AND. ISRAEL ?????
    NUCLEAR WEAPONS ARE NECESSARY. FOR DETERRANCE
    BRASIL. 🇧🇷 NEEDS TO BUILD. NUCLEAR. MISSILES OR THE. USA. WILL DO TO BRASIL. THE SAME THEY DID TO VENEZUELA
    WE NEED MORE NUCLEAR MISSILES AS. A FORM OF DETERRANCE. AGAINST. THE USA. AND ISRAEL.

  • @dunomood
    @dunomood Month ago +1

    No dangers...Russia is weak.
    Free Ukraine 💛💙✌✌

  • @VivianKreimer
    @VivianKreimer Month ago

    Bollocks

  • @GeraldMantel
    @GeraldMantel Month ago +1

    Amerika .... DUH!

  • @GeraldMantel
    @GeraldMantel Month ago +1

    Weirdo ads from weirdo Amerikans are, to be fair, non-nuclear ...

  • @GeraldMantel
    @GeraldMantel Month ago +1

    I doubt China will ever get to 70,000 ...