JUDGE SHUTS DOWN EMBEZZLING SOVEREIGN IDIOT BEFORE COFFEE!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 фев 2024
- Defendant wants a new "constitutional" attorney two weeks before his trial! Yet another example of what our courts deal with every day…
Join to support this channel ($2/mo) to get access to priority chat & extra quick clips:
/ @osgcourtwatch
SOVEREIGN CIDIOTS IN COURT: • SOVEREIGN CITIZENS IN ...
KAREN’S IN COURT: • KARENS IN COURT !!!
CRAZY TRAFFIC COURT: • FUN IN TRAFFIC COURT !!!
HAVE YA SEEN THIS ONE YET? • HAVE YA SEEN THIS ONE ...
LAW NERDS ASSEMBLE: • LAW NERDS ASSEMBLE !!
SHORT CHUCKLES: • Short Chuckles...
This remix is intended to provide better insight into how our courts and the folks who run them administer justice to the public they serve. Remember they have to deal with folks who are often having their worst day on a daily basis. We also hope to bring you cases with interesting legal concepts, twists and interactions you may not encounter elsewhere…
This commentary remix work constitutes a fair use of any copyrighted materials under section 107 of the US copyright law. Video was edited only to add relevant commentary and to reduce time in the hopes it will be more convenient to be viewed by more folks thereby raising public interest. All defendants are innocent until they aren’t…officially.
#court #zoom #crazy #sovereign citizen #sovcit #trending #funny #karen #judge #moor 
Развлечения
Imagine facing that kind of jail time and thinking, "No worries! I'll represent myself with these cool phrases I learned from a guy on Facebook!"
I believe it's often the kind of people who think or know that they are in the wrong and have no chance to win with evidence or even benefit of the doubt.
So they go all in with their SovCit Nonsense, not realizing that their poker chips are actually crayon drawings.
@@boooster101
At least they can argue they had ineffective counsel on appeal 🤡
Darrell Brooks faced 6 life sentences AND 1000 years in jail and he represented himself. Lost epically too.
@@davidedwards1705absolutely, this guy needs to check out just how well Brooks did with this defense.
Yeah it's one thing to be this dumb when facing a traffic citation.
It's a whole other LEVEL of stupid when you're looking at DECADES in jail.
This judge is direct and don't accept any sovereign B.S.
Just a good, old-fashioned smack down. She was having NONE of his nonsense. 😂
She shut his a$$ down!!! I wish other judges would take notes. It drives me crazy when they let these "trash humans" control the courtroom. I will say, your starting to see more judges shut this shit down right away. I don't know why these losers even try it when there are hundreds of court videos of douchebags trying this and it NEVER works
What a breath of fresh air after watching too many deSantis videos.
@@misterdedlift4879 😂😂
DeSantis scares me, there's something very small and weak about him, he covers it up with bluster, like Trump.
And she knows EXACTLY what he is talking about..
“If you were dead, the case would be dismissed” 🤣🤣😂🤣😂😂🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Well, actually the case might proceed against his estate, to recover the stolen property, or it’s cash value.
Comedy Gold for sure!
@@andrewallason4530 But the estate wouldn't be in jail for 25 years. 😄
@@vdavis4785 saving the taxpayers a bucket load of money!
"Your honor i am not a living entity"
ATTY MARGOSIAN: "Your Honor, my client has expressed his desire to make a complete and total ass of himself before the court, and I am more than happy to quietly sit back and laugh a him as he talks himself straight into a jail cell."
"Please proceed.."
LOL!
💯
He's so deep in his sovcit script that he doesn't spare two brain cells to consider that there is an OBVIOUS victim in embezzlement and it's not just the usual traffic violation where it's a bit more ambiguous.
He’s going to be the victim , the victim in jail
@@jodiforeman3314He will likely be more of a lover, against his will.
he wasn't embezzling. he was Strategically Transferring Equipment to an Alternate Location.
"I, I, I need some time to think". The earth will have been absorbed by the sun by the time his brain computes that he needs an attorney.
@@raylf3141 That's ok. The judge isn't sentencing him to prison. She will be finding him alternate housing with new roommates and staff members who will care for him.
She may be my new favorite judge. She treated this exactly the way all judges should treat sovereign citizens.
He's facing 25 years in prison and he's arguing how his name is spelled. He thinks he can steal money from a company because he can't cross examine a company. People with no common sense are a danger to society.
exactly. he went down the rabbit hole a long time earlier, and thought he was now a winner at life, gonna steal from this faceless corp! Freedumb Baby!
Apparently HE can be a representative for some name, but the company he stole from is not allowed to have a representative. How exactly does that work?😂😂😂
somehow using all caps is very important to them. obeying the law and having required licenses? not so much. maybe they should all move to CA or NYC- they don't have laws or don't enforce laws for criminal behavior
@@Mike1614b Wow. Tell that to the 67,000 people incarcerated in NY, or the 200,000 people incarcerated in CA. I'm sure they'd be glad to know that there are no laws or enforcement of criminal behavior in those states.
@@Mike1614bthat’s as dumb as the sovereign citizens stuff.
The lady did NOT care to dance...
This is exactly the way that Sovcit gibberish should be summarily dismissed in criminal court - this is a serious matter, no nonsense will be permitted. The only reason that most other judges banter back and forth endlessly must arise from sheer boredom, a means of providing some entertainment value to their otherwise regimented, daily routine.
I agree that this is how it should be handled, but I don't agree that the banter comes from boredom. Most judges' schedules are incredibly packed; they don't generally have opportunities for boredom. It's more likely the judges who let defendants go on and on are doing so in an effort to avoid the appearance that they're not being fair and impartial.
I think it's taken them some time to figure out how to deal with them, now that they're so prevalent. They've been patient and compassionate as they would be with mentally ill defendants, but this is a different breed. Contempt is contempt.
@@davidwilliams5407 agreed, and it is usually some type of traffic violation. Feel kinda bad for these low IQ individuals who are so easily taken in by anything whether it is this or quack doctors on tv. It isn't a situation that will ever go away.
She shut his a$$ down!!! I wish other judges would take notes. It drives me crazy when they let these "trash humans" control the courtroom. I will say, your starting to see more judges shut this shit down right away. I don't know why these losers even try it when there are hundreds of court videos of douchebags trying this and it NEVER works
Very well written Mr. Birdman. Love your name. Lol. This sovcidiot has a birdbrain. No offense to you sir!
So happy to finally hear the judge vocalize almost the very thing that I think to myself, "if you were dead, the charges would be dismissed" every time I hear "I'm the living man/woman" nonsense.
"Still a crime. Still a crime. Still a crime."
"This does provide you with a means of getting these charges dismissed, but I cannot officially recommend it."
"Glad you're a living man. I get tired of locking up dead people. "
Hopefully, his Internet lawyering secures that potential 20 plus sentence.
@JYoung-fl8fc Let us know when evidence backs up such a claim.
He steals 70k and wants to argue about all caps name???? Dude's got a rude awakening coming...
He wants to postpone his reckoning as long as possible. Maybe something will come up.
There is a victim so his argument is doomed
But does the flag have gold fringe? That's about the only sovtard argument he missed.
@@millipedicSomething’s going to “come up” alright … his first night in bed with his new cellmate, Bubba the Psychotic Murderer.
I’m guessing the movement is just founded on looking for loopholes. Shame they’re all closed off by something else!
"Do I want to continue this Sov Cit nonsense that has never worked with a judge that ain't playin' and to go prison for 25 years... or do I want to STFU and let my lawyer do a plea deal and hopefully get a lighter sentence? Decisions, decisions."
And you know he's going to make the wrong one!
"I thought about it and F the lawyers! None of this is real!"
Exactly knew the moment the defendant realized his sovcit rhetoric wasn’t working. I busted out laughing. Priceless!
@@kayfurlano1462 he's going to fold soon and ask for help, like he thinks he's a victim.
I get the feeling people like this have an all or nothing mentality where you either go free or you lose and they'd rather push all their chips onto the board in the hopes of winning (going free without consequences) rather than taking a lighter punishment by admitting some wrongdoing.
"You are standing in my courtroom, I have jurisdiction over you." Exactly, and I wish all judges would make this clear to these idiots. For the fact these sov-cidiots are even in the courtroom means that they are fully aware that they are subject to the laws of this country.
I liked the judge who said, "I can prove that I have jurisdiction over you. Bailiff, take this person into custody."
Perfect all judges should talk like this
I’m
So impressed
Actually I think they really do believe their BS, but they go to court to try to show they know more, to show the corruption they think exists and to educate those they think are in the dark.
I often post judges should say, "my jurisdiction begins with 'We The People.' My jurisdiction is from the people who want these laws. If you don't like it argue with them."
@@steveswangler6373They’re incredibly delusional.
This Judge was great. She handled him.
He doesn’t realize how much jail time he is facing and acting as his own lawyer
Wtf
"I am a living man", "Yes, because if you were dead your case would be dismissed" LOL
So he thinks that stealing close to $70,000 in tools from a business leaves no victim
He doesn't think much at all. Just following his script.
"I need some time to think" Like he's ever thought before. 🤣🤣🤣
What you are seeing is his attempt to control the proceedings. "I need time to think about it" really means, I need time to see what youtube nuts tell me to do now. If he's smart and lucky, he'll stumble across OldSquishy videos and conclude that his situation is indeed pretty dire, and no amount of word salad wrangling is going to help his position.
it just takes a long time when he does it. that's why he lets a jpg on instagram do it all for him.
He’s going to need some headache meds after attempting this.
That was the smartest thing he said all day.
He needs a lot more than time.
“I need some time to think…” is the sound of SovCit brain malfunctioning.
He needs time to rehearse his script. 😂
She is awesome
"Reboot, reboot, reboot..."
Back in the old days when you would print something off the computer, the computer would "printing" and then it would pause printing and the computer would say "thinking." It used to take forever to print things off the computer.
@@scottdiamond74😅 yep! He needs to search the internet fringe for his next move!😅
I can steal a business blind with both hands and face no consequences because that business can’t appear in court. Do these guys ever listen to the words coming out of their mouths?
Yeah, even as sovcits go, that is pretty damn stupid.
In this case there is a victim
And it’s not him
They do and they all think they're geniuses who are going to outsmart the whole legal system because they watched a few RUclips videos. 😂
But but but, the Supreme Court said so. Sovereign citizens are nuts.
@@kevinbossick8374 Logic is not their strong suit.
"Nope. Not valid." Direct and to the point. Shutting down the Sov Idiot before he goes on his rambling word salad, saving everyone time.
I've seen videos of sovcits having a discussion with the judge for 60 minutes. This one is better. Quick, to the point, shutup, next.
How can he say there is not a victim in this case , does he think he’s got access to everyone’s money
@@jodiforeman3314No, he’s saying that there’s no victim to face him, which isn’t required. An accuser has to face him. The accuser is the state, not the victim. Sovcits lack the mental capacity to learn. They only know to apply “common sense” to understand legal terms, not to look up what they mean.
The Constitution says you have the right to face your accuser. He assumes the accuser is who reported the crime. The accuser is the state.
He, like most SovCits, can’t successfully execute subject/verb agreement, yet he is arrogant/delusional enough to believe he can word salad his way out of accountability for his crimes. The hubris is as vast as the ignorance.
It's a classic example of someone being too dumb to know they are dumb.
I really like this Judge. She is shutting the silly arguments down, but doing it calmly and respectfully. Well done.
He stole from a company that hired him and trusted him. What a scumbag. Instead of trying to make it right and beg forgiveness and mercy, he has gone on the internet like so many other people who have totally screwed up in life and bought a program of magic words that promise to save him. He'd be better off trying to get away from his problems by growing magic beanstalk seeds so he can climb to the clouds.
I think his lawyer hit him with the truth and facts and he didn't like it....his charges and the consequences are very frightening. Insulting the court isn't a good start...
It’s those dang TikTok lawyers that keep popping up saying all that crap that means nothing yet these SC think so much of. 😂
😂😂
The seeds are in his pocket. He's just waiting for planting season. He'll be fine as long as his pet unicorn doesn't eat the sprouts.
@@jeepliving1 Well of course. The Unicorn precaution is very reasonable.
What every one of these idiots does not understand is that companies are property, owned by the shareholders of said companies. So when something is done to a company, when someone steals from it or harms it in any way, they are damaging the property of those owners. Thus, there are, indeed, actual human victims.
Don't confuse him. That's not in his script.
@@Palamas1359😂😂
@ischler8662
There is a bell curve that describes the spread of IQs in a population. The left hand of that diagram are the folks below average.. and those at the very end are below 85 IQ. I'm thinking this guy is on the extreme left of that curve. All he knows how to do is create problems for himself, not how to solve problems and stay out of trouble.
Not all companies are owned by shareholders. And while the company owners are the victims when a company is robbed, but trying to elicit sympathy for shareholders- whose only aim is to make money no matter how- falls on deaf ears here.
With all of the unethical crap corporations pull I will never feel badly for any negativity that befalls them.
Do I condone stealing? No. But I don’t feel badly for scumbags whose only care is for money
Yes, but these people are broke idiots that have no clue of the concept shareholders, or any kind of owners.
“You can’t own properly, man.”
“Sure I can. I’m not some penniless hippy.”
'That's why you're standing in front of me, because if you were dead the case would be dismissed'😂😂😂
She handled his sov cit nonsense beautifully
Her and judge Stevens are my favourite they don’t have time for this bs
If you were dead the case would be dismissed
She’s not only a great judge but has a great sense of humor love her
@@jodiforeman3314 yes! I lol'd at that. He looked so annoyed.
I LOVE IT. I'm still waiting for a judge to just point blank tell them "this stuff you're reading on the internet is complete and utter bullshit".
I've heard so many judges say that to sovcits.
Well she said not valid. That’s the polite court version.
Judge Oakley
We need more judges such as her!
Many if not most judges palaver with sovcits because they consider they have to make a record that will stand up on appeal. It is gradually becoming clear that the appeals courts, uniformly, have declared the sovcit contentions to be frivolous and without merit. This judge has taken note of that and understands that "frivolous and without merit" means she can summarily dismiss the contentions without hearing them in extenso. All other judges in all jurisdictions should do the same. both for the sake of judicial economy, to discourage sovcits, and to cut into the revenues of the "gurus" who peddle the garbage.
Sounds about right. I'm not a lawyer, but I did figure that the judges in these types of cases weren't just wasting time.. but rather treating the arguments as real. I'm REALLY glad to hear the appeals courts are finally considering all the pseudo-legal sovcit crap as frivolous.. like you said.. a tremendous amount of wasted time/money that can be recovered at the lower courts level... much less the cost of an appeals court considering the extra information and all that time wasted.
Thanks a LOT for the legal perspective!
Great insight, thanks!
That’s a lot of assumptions.
Love how the Judge just shuts it down from the start
She’s brilliant
All judges should do this! Beautiful to watch
Love this judge calls him
On everything no time for rebuttals no excuses
Omg she’s a sov cits worst nightmare has an argument for everything he tries to retaliate 😂
I think they need a new script. This one doesn’t seem to be working. Lol.
I love how it seems that judges are beginning to speed run sovcit interactions now. That's how it should be done.
I also love it when sovcits ask "who is the victim" in cases where there clearly is a victim.
“There is no victim”
“The victim would be the company”
So there’s a victim lol
Love how this Judge just shut this idiot down at every turn of his Sov script.
Woah. The judges are definitely catching on. She laid that one to rest without even suffering a delay. What a rockstar!
Its the first time I've seen this judge and I really like her style. 👍
Omg she is brilliant he’s so dumb he doesn’t understand how much time he’s facing he thinks he’s got a loophole but what he has is no brain
I have seen her a few times, even on SovCit cases. But this one is the highest stakes with up to 25 years and it is also the one where she totally shuts the defendant down quickly with no BS at all.
I wish more judges would act like this. "No, that's not legal sir." Society often times avoids saying "No" when "No" is the appropriate answer. Way to go judge!
Society does? Really? Perhaps individuals, but society in general?
@@steveswangler6373 Yes. Certainly. Schools, parents, coaches, friends. Dog owners. The military. The government and law enforcement with illegal immigrants and looters for example. Its pervasive and easy to spot.
@@steveswangler6373 society, represented by individuals. 😆
All judges act like this and society doesn’t avoid saying “no”.
Great job by Judge Anzalone in quickly slicing through the defendant's tissue paper Sovereign Citizen defense tactics. No need for long involved arguments and rebuttals from the Bench when a simple "No" is all that is needed to be said. Well done, Judge, well done.
She’s rhe best let him represent himself he is his own worst enemy
He says there must be a victim and he has the right to face his accuser, so what would happen if he murdered someone, the accuser and victim cannot appear.
True. I am waiting for a SovTwit, when asked does he/she have any witnesses they ask for ALL the people of the city/county/state. I have the right to face my accuser.
The state is the accuser on behalf of a murder victim.
@@blindjustice8718 SovCits would say that this isn't true, and try to back it up with more magic phrases. You cant reason with the delusional.
I applaud this judge! If more judges treated these clowns this way, this SovCit nonsense would have been stopped a long time ago! Arguing with them does no good and just encourages them. Keep it up, Judge.!
She's smart, crisp and no nonsense! Wonderful!
That was text book handling of these idiots! No arguing, no haggling, no humoring. Just right to the point!
This appearance is pretty much a microcosm of all Sov Citiot arguments and beliefs. The brilliant judge prevents the proceedings from becoming a cluster by refusing to engage in stupidity. Well Done!
According to someone who is (apparently) a lawyer posting above, the most likely reason why so many judges are listening to the stupid arguments is to make sure their decisions survive the appeal process. But if appellate courts make it clear that the sovcit arguments are frivolous/without merit lower level court judges can simply deny the argument immediately and it will speed things up. I think all the sovcit nonsense got real traction in the early 2010s as more folks got access to the sovcit info and started trying to use it. Now appellate courts are finally starting to catch up.
Like all things judicial.. it seems like these types of things take a decade or more before the appellate court understands enough to make these types of administrative decisions.
At least he didn't claim not to be a citizen of the USA, like so many do. Judges should be ready for that one, and if it occurs they should advise the defendants that, if they persevere with that crap, the Feds would be called to take them away to a detention center to await deportation, along with other aliens who also have no visa. However, as they would be unable to name a country where they are a citizen, they would be declared stateless, and be unable to be released. I suspect that at this point much of the SovCit crap would cease, and they would be grateful to admit to their US citizenship, with all the rights, privileges and responsibilities that apply, including dealing with the court case at hand.
"Embezzlement is a victimless crime. Only a company was injured, and a company can't show up to court to testify, so you should let me go."
The gall...
That's like saying you can get away with murder, because the victim cannot be present to accuse you of killing them.
I think for the rest of this month I'll use "Musgrove" to insult someone being obstinate. Imagine Andy Dufresne asking the warden "why are you being so Musgove - is it deliberate?"
The defendant embezzled over 60K from his employer and he is behaving with no remorse.
This one will be so much fun - please follow his next appearances!
He needs some "time to think".
I feel quite skeptical that his brain is up to the task.
He needs time to ask his Facebook lawyers why she didn't accept his babbling nonsense. 😂😂
What brain.
Throw his butt in jail until the next hearing.
He’s looking up to 25 years hope he gets it
Facing 25 years in prison and wants to FAAFO
"I am a living person."
"And that is why you are standing in front of me. If you were dead, the case would be dismissed."
I love how judges are learning to deal with this bullshit more and more effectively.
According to a lawyer posting above, the appellate courts are finally making it clear that sovcit arguments are without merit.. which makes for the type of interactions we are seeing above. Didn't know this until today, so good info!
Nice to see a judge do that for a change
perfectly handled.......well done your Honor
The judge is FANTASTIC!
Judge Anxalone is a rockstar !
thank YOU, OSG luv ya
Now that’s the way to manage your courtroom!!!
"If you were dead, the case would be dismissed."
And, here I thought the judge wasn't supposed to give legal advice...
Which name did he steal that money, lower case or higher case name? 😂😂😂😂😂
It's amazing to me that these folks go all in with their insistence on their bs , even though it doesn't work for any of them. One would think they'd want to figure out "how to play the game" in US courts, rather than lose every time.
Oh but each one of them believe that they will be the one to be successful in their BS.
"I'm gonna take on the law all by my lonesome... Here, hold my beer!" 😂
This judge’s running her courtroom should be the gold standard!
BRILLIANT RESPONSES BY THE JUDGE!
Dude, you're facing 25 years in jail here. Drop this BS and do the honorable thing. Find a lawyer to make sure that your rights are protected, refute the charges that are untrue, admit to the charges that are true and accept the consequences of the crime that you know you committed.
Oh I disagree. I think he needs to keep peddling this crap and earn his 25 years.
I was in court once, and not a traffic ticket. I stood up and said, "Yea, I did that." And I earned the jail time that came after.
And some "ADULTS"(?) are shocked I would do that.
The defendant knows the charges are true and is grasping at straws to get out of it. It’s not a crime to be stupid! If it was there would certainly be more charges!
@@netherstar2553
All people understand the definition of 'responsibility', but some use most of their life trying to avoid it. Criminals are just at the extreme end of that spectrum.
I'm not shocked you did that (well, maybe a little.. since your attitude is SO rare).. I would also. My father taught me to take my lumps and accept responsibility for the wrongs I've committed against others.
Judge: "none of that is valid or legal". Me: laughing my ass off.
Oh this Judge is awesome! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
So he steals from his employer and he states "there is no victim."? Oh I hope he represents himself, please 🙏
I truly wish "these people" understood that the term "Sovereign Citizen " in itself is an Oxymoron. One CANNOT be a "Sovereign" while at the exact same time claim to be a Citizen. It's either one or the other folks. 🤦🏻🥴🤡
They are good at that, picking the things they like or benefit from..
It is an oxymoron with no context applied to it. It is an exact description of what they are, which is a citizen with the mistaken belief that they are a sovereign being. It is also the name the founders of the SovCit movement picked for themselves.
@@willer3399 lol my point clearly escapes the both of you. It's very easy to cast judgement upon people and call them names. Pretty much everyone does it these days. RUclips comments sections are chalked full of over-opinionated, under-educated folks who believe their own "point of view" is the "correct" one even though they've never lifted a finger to explore the opposite perspective or point of view from a truly neutral, unbiased stance. Both sides of an "issue" hurl the same names and insults at/about each other just like children on an elementary school playground and nothing of any meaning or merit gets accomplished while doing so. It's cute and kind of hilarious when children do it, when adults do it, eh, not so much. That's just sad, hypocritical and is pretty much the main reason why our society is beginning to resemble the comedy central movie Idiocracy these days. The days of true critical thinking have gone the way of the dinosaurs.
In reality, neither side of "this argument" (or more like lack thereof) has a clue WTF any of you are talking about, it's basically the equivalent of proverbial gangland Warfare. People pick a "side" based upon their own conformation biases and life experiences, and then hurl insults back and forth at each other like caged monkeys in a circus flinging their own excrement at each other out of pure boredom simply for something to do. How freaking sad is that.
Personally I have more faith in the common man/woman and humanity than that. Maybe instead of allowing my words to trigger you and taking them personally, actually try to consider the point about the "bigger picture" im trying to make here. I believe in you. Just try it. You might be amazed at the doors it can open for you. ⚖️
The term "sovereign citizen," as used today, is not an oxymoron; it's an idiom. An idiom is a group of words established by usage as having a meaning not deducible from those of the individual words. The term was originally coined by SovCits to describe themselves. They only stopped using it about a decade ago when it developed unsavory connotations. It may well have been an oxymoron at the time SovCits were using it. I have no opinion on that.
However, the term, as used today by mainstream society, is intended to be taken as a whole, not with the words separated and analyzed individually. That is the essence of an idiom. It is a label that we've applied to people with the SovCit belief system, and it is almost universally accepted for that purpose.
Incidentally, I have studied SovCit claims extensively. I've thoroughly investigated every single SovCit claim I've been able to find over the years. I'm an attorney with 35 years of litigation experience, a retired prosecutor, and a pro-tem judge who teaches continuing legal education classes on SovCits to judges and prosecutors. While there is good reason to have faith in the common man/woman (it's why we use juries), there is absolutely no validity whatsoever to the SovCit world view.
@@gummo3873 I think the biggest problem for society nowadays is that ppl think they must pick a side in everything that they come across..
Imagine the chaos this world would be in if people were able to steal from their employer and not have criminal charges placed against them because they stole from a business, not a person. Ffs. It’s like saying “where’s the victim” in a murder trail, and saying the victim can’t testify, therefore the case can’t proceed.
this is a perfect example of what a good judge does to cut threw the BS of the accused, and get him to trial, and spend the next decade in the slammer, Good job Ms Judge.
The fact that he helped himself to $70k of his company’s money and is now standing in court for theft AND spouting Sovcit nonsense as an act of desperation means that he is one life’s true losers.
Him acting shocked at 0:40 as he realises some nonsense he read on Reddit doesn’t have any legal standing 😂
Google his name... he has a history of being a thief and spending time in prison. What I loved the most about this judge is she tried to scare him with showing she COULD run his sentences consecutively. Translation... don't piss her off or you will spend more time in jail than you might normally have to.
That judge was awesome!
That judge was calling BS, BS, BS, BS!
6:49 "If you were dead it would be case dismissed" 🤣🤣🤣
Hot damn, I love this Judge!!
“I need some time to think”…..Don’t hurt yourself.
Great judge. Everything she said was to the point and she remained matter of fact without being disrespectful.
When you break the law do not go to Google to try and find a way out. It's just like being a Google doctor..it never works out
The All Caps Name defense! Brilliant! There's no way any jury would convict this legal genius!
Nice work - "None of that is valid, none of it is law. You're standing here in my Court and you are under my jurisdiction."
This is a beautiful smack done - well done judge. Just don't play the game.
I’m torn on if I love “no, we’re not playing that game, all those arguments are invalid, let’s move on” or “oh, if you’re not the named defendant, then the defendant is getting a bench warrant for failure to appear, have a nice day” more.
If the judge doesn't have jurisdiction, why did he even appear?
There has to be a victim. OK, who did you steal the 68,000 worth of tools from.
A victimless crime.... that's a tough sell here. And it will probably end up in civil court in addition to criminal, so that will blow a hole in part of the sovcit argument.
People think they can pull money out of black holes. Yeah, the economy wouldntake off!
Yeah, Doofus should have upgraded to the embezzlement script instead of cheaping out on the traffic one.
I like this judge, shuts him down without belittling him, advises him he should take the lawyer, and gives him time to get his act together. Well done!
*No such thing as a smart SovCit. No exceptions.*
I confuse this judge with Magistrate Fink. Who's in a different district, I believe.
They do look fairly alike, but Magistrate Fink would be a little too nice and let this non-stop nonsense drag on too long.
@@jayschafer1760 you're right about that. Fink ain't tough.
"There has to be a victim to be tried", dude $69k from your old employer is a lot of money and tools, yeah there is a victim. Why is he walking around free, he must have paid a really substantial bond, not. I can see him at the bond agent
him: I need a $5k 10% bond
them: okay that will be $500
him: okay if I pay by check
them: what are you accused of
him: embezzlement
them: NOPE CASH ONLY.
😂😂😂😂
Facing 25 year Prison Sentence for this embezzlement Crime and the guy needs to think about using a Free Attorney? How stupid can you get?
Must be another Trump voter.
I'm really surprised at how many sovereign citiots there are out there.
Love this judge. No BS allowed👏
He needs time to think? His problem is, he doesn't know how to think.
It is nice to see the professionals getting good at shutting down this crap really fast
I only wish i could have laughed directly in this bold dudes face.
I've never seen anyone do it better. What a beast
Love this Judge!
Well that took the wind out of his sails and he didn't even mention "admiralty "law.