Žižek on the Lacanian Real

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 июл 2022
  • Žižek discusses the Lacanian Real as a purely formal category.
    zizekandsoon.com for the Žižek & So On Podcast:
    New episodes every week - Join the Patreon for Discord access and Patreon exclusive episodes.
  • РазвлеченияРазвлечения

Комментарии • 17

  • @Retrogamer71
    @Retrogamer71 29 дней назад +4

    I now have enough Lacan to understand what zizek is saying here. Prior knowledge as the condition of its own reality, the gateway to the idea and concept discussed.

  • @pablosarti1216
    @pablosarti1216 2 года назад +18

    The real is the obstacle itself, and the condition of possibility

  • @daisydaisy...4562
    @daisydaisy...4562 3 месяца назад +10

    Looking for the real is like looking for the dark with a flashlight.....

  • @Quinceps
    @Quinceps 2 года назад +12

    Ii’s just natural for some concepts to be defined tautologically if they can only be understood by and within a whole network or system of concepts.

  • @merkucjo5904
    @merkucjo5904 2 месяца назад +1

    Lao Tzu in Dao de ching describes Real as sth you cannot describe, you can only find it's manifestations and it's run everything in universe. He was before you.

  • @Syllogyzym
    @Syllogyzym 2 года назад +2

    Where can we find the full interview?

    • @ZizekandSoOn
      @ZizekandSoOn  2 года назад +1

      We’ll upload all the clips eventually

    • @Syllogyzym
      @Syllogyzym 2 года назад

      @@ZizekandSoOn Great, thanks!

    • @pobblebonk3
      @pobblebonk3 2 месяца назад

      Did you upload the clip or are you able to indicate the reference or source?

  • @excitingworld364
    @excitingworld364 2 месяца назад +4

    Not well explained, on a pretense that its impossible to explain well. Note the same circular logics.

  • @worldofsimulacra
    @worldofsimulacra 3 месяца назад +1

    Couldn't the Real be defined as nature-as-such, nature in itself? IOW the entire realm of "what happens" behind and before and beyond any attempts to symbolize or contextualize it?

    • @isawilraen9816
      @isawilraen9816 2 месяца назад +2

      It 'could' if it helps you to understand it, but attempting to define the Real (positively) is in and of itself a problem.

    • @EarlofSedgewick
      @EarlofSedgewick 22 дня назад

      Perhaps it would line up with the Hard Problem of Consciousness. Is this why Zizek is so interested in quantum physics?

    • @user_-qg6yd
      @user_-qg6yd День назад

      In some sense that is what the Real is, it is that indefinite background to our experience which exerts a pressure on us. However you fall in the trap of trying to define the real. The idea that there is such a thing as nature-in-itself is but a concept, and as such it isn’t what the Real is (since the real is what isn’t and can’t be symbolized!)