LIVE 🥊 Beterbiev vs. Bivol 2: The Last Crescendo | Press Conference
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 фев 2025
- Watch #BeterbievBivol2 LIVE on Feb 22 on TNT Sports Box Office ▶️ www.tntsports.co.uk/boxoffice
Hit 'Subscribe' above to ensure you never miss a video from the TNT Sports Boxing RUclips channel.
From the front row to your front room. From the centre circle to your sofa. TNT Sports brings you closer to the live sport you love.
Get your Discovery + pass now to experience UEFA Champions League and Europa League drama, exclusive Premier League action, plus Premiership Rugby, MotoGP, Boxing, UFC, WWE and more ▶️ auth.discovery...
Twitter: / tntsports
Facebook: / tntsports
Instagram: / tntsports
Website: www.tntsports....
58:08 😂
Betebiev too strong
Артур Бетербиев чемпион 🥇👍
Winner predictions:
Beterbiev
Sheeraz
Shakur
Madrimov
Dubois
Buatsi
Kabayel
My predictions:
Bivol.
Sheeraz.
Shakur.
Madrimov.
Dubois.
Smith.
Kabayel.
@ fair enough. Close fights all the way through besides Shakurs fight.
Parker will give Dubois problems
i hope parker wins
Lennox Lewis was the undisputed champion yes, but he wasn’t the peoples champion
wake up! they had to add the trinity later
Many Christians use this verse to prove the existence of the Trinity. For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. (1 John 5:7) The issue with this verse is that it is universally recognized by Biblical scholars and historians, including thirty-two Christian scholars of the highest eminence backed by fifty cooperating Christian denominations, as being inserted by the Church later. Since it was proven that this verse is a fabrication, it has been deleted from some of the later Bibles, such as the Revised Standard Version and the New Revised Standard Version...,,.,
the comission matt 28.19 isnt found in any manuscript befire the 3rd century.
Not only did they add in that " paulanity was now to be spread to the world" they later, had to add in the trinity to this already added command
The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, I, 275:
“It is often affirmed that the words in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost are not the ipsissima verba [exact words] of Jesus, but…a later liturgical addition.”,
Edmund Schlink, The Doctrine of Baptism, page 28:
“The baptismal command in its Matthew 28:19 form can not be the historical origin of Christian baptism. At the very least, it must be assumed that the text has been transmitted in a form expanded by the [Catholic] church..,,..,.
The Catholic Encyclopedia, II, page 263:
“The baptismal formula was changed from the name of Jesus Christ to the words Father, Son, and Holy Spirit by the Catholic Church in the second century.”