Republic P 47 Thunderbolt: Fighter, Bomber, And WWII Escort Aircraft | Restored & Upscaled Film

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 18 окт 2024
  • The Republic P 47 Thunderbolt is a World War II-era fighter aircraft produced by the American aerospace company Republic Aviation from 1941 through 1945. Its primary armament was eight .50-caliber machine guns, and in the fighter-bomber ground-attack role it could carry 5-inch rockets or a bomb load of 2,500 lb (1,100 kg). When fully loaded, the P-47 weighed up to 8 tons, making it one of the heaviest fighters of the war.
    Join this channel to support it:
    / @dronescapes
    Click the link to watch more aircraft, heroes, and their stories, and missions: / @dronescapes
    The Thunderbolt was effective as a short-to-medium-range escort fighter in high-altitude air-to-air combat and ground attack in both the European and Pacific theaters. The P-47 was designed around the powerful Pratt & Whitney R-2800 Double Wasp 18-cylinder radial engine, which also powered two U.S. Navy/U.S. Marine Corps fighters, the Grumman F6F Hellcat and the Vought F4U Corsair. An advanced turbosupercharger system ensured the aircraft's eventual dominance at high altitudes, while also influencing its size and design.
    The P-47 was one of the main United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) fighters of World War II, and also served with other Allied air forces, including those of France, the United Kingdom, and the Soviet Union. Mexican and Brazilian squadrons fighting alongside the USAAF also flew the P-47.
    The armored cockpit was relatively roomy and comfortable and the bubble canopy introduced on the P-47D offered good visibility. Nicknamed the "Jug" owing to its appearance if stood on its nose, the P-47 was noted for its firepower, as well as its ability to resist battle damage and remain airworthy. A present-day U.S. ground-attack aircraft, the Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II, takes its name from the P-47.
    By the end of 1942, P-47Cs were sent to England for combat operations. The initial Thunderbolt Flyers, 56th Fighter Group, was sent overseas to join the 8th Air Force. As the P-47 Thunderbolt worked up to operational status, it gained a nickname: "Jug" (because its profile was similar to that of a common milk jug of the time). Two fighter groups (FGs) already stationed in England began introducing the Jugs in January 1943 - the Spitfire-flying 4th Fighter Group, a unit built around a core of experienced American pilots who had flown in the RAF Eagle Squadrons prior to the US entry in the war; and the 78th Fighter Group, formerly flying P-38 Lightnings.
    P-47 pilot Lt Col Francis S. "Gabby" Gabreski, 56th Fighter Group, the leading ace of the 8th Air Force
    Beginning in January 1943, Thunderbolt fighters were sent to the joint Army Air Forces - civilian Millville Airport in Millville, New Jersey, to train civilian and military pilots.
    The first P-47 combat mission took place 10 March 1943 when the 4th FG took their aircraft on a fighter sweep over France. The mission was a failure due to radio malfunctions. All P-47s were refitted with British radios, and missions resumed 8 April. The first P-47 air combat took place 15 April with Major Don Blakeslee of the 4th FG scoring the Thunderbolt's first air victory (against a Focke-Wulf Fw 190).
    General characteristics
    Crew: 1
    Length: 36 ft 1.75 in (11.0173 m)
    Wingspan: 40 ft 9+5⁄16 in (12.429 m)
    Height: 14 ft 8+1⁄16 in (4.472 m)
    Airfoil: Seversky S-3
    Empty weight: 10,000 lb (4,536 kg)
    Max takeoff weight: 17,500 lb (7,938 kg)
    Powerplant: 1 × Pratt & Whitney R-2800-59 18-cylinder air-cooled radial piston engine, 2,000 hp (1,500 kW)
    Propellers: 4-bladed Curtiss Electric C542S constant-speed propeller, 13 ft 0 in (3.96 m) diameter
    Performance
    Maximum speed: 426 mph (686 km/h, 370 kn) at 30,000 ft (9,100 m)
    Range: 1,030 mi (1,660 km, 900 nmi)
    Service ceiling: 42,000 ft (13,000 m)
    Armament
    Eight .50 in (12.7 mm) M2 Browning machine guns (3400 rounds)
    Up to 2,500 lb (1,100 kg) of bombs
    Ten 5 in (127 mm) HVAR unguided rockets
    #p47 #thunderboi #aircraft

Комментарии • 36

  • @Dronescapes
    @Dronescapes  Год назад +4

    Join this channel to support it:
    ruclips.net/channel/UCTTqBgYdkmFogITlPDM0M4Ajoin
    Click the link to watch more aircraft, heroes, and their stories, and missions: www.youtube.com/@Dronescapes

    • @Wardads1
      @Wardads1 Год назад

      June 1940 is a year and a half before your war started , my family had been at war since 1939.

  • @carbonstar9091
    @carbonstar9091 Год назад +14

    What a beast the P-47 was. A true fighter bomber.

    • @mattosullivan9687
      @mattosullivan9687 Год назад +1

      I fly RC planes. I just got a new P 47 I had one before they are a blast to fly. And , I do in respect to the men that flew the full scale ones in war for freedom

    • @polygamous1
      @polygamous1 Год назад

      with the Merlin engine of course but a Great plane YES

    • @GymChess
      @GymChess Год назад +2

      @@polygamous1It didn’t have a Merlin engine. It was the Pratt&Whitney 2800.

  • @pwr2al4
    @pwr2al4 Год назад +13

    You can have your Mustangs, make mine a Jug!

  • @melvyncox3361
    @melvyncox3361 Год назад +2

    A beast this aircraft was,and the same company went on to produce yet another beast,the F105 Thunderchief.......

  • @RobertGraziose
    @RobertGraziose 9 дней назад

    Another fine aircraft that like the Grumman Hellcat, Wildcat, Bearcat, Tigercat, and Tomcat was built here on Long Island. My dad worked for Grumman and brother worked for Republic. My cousin and I always fought about what company was better. It's so sad and at a great loss to the islands economy that both are now out of business. I always regarded the Thunderbolt as the air cores Hellcat.

  • @mattosullivan9687
    @mattosullivan9687 Год назад +1

    I like it. Thunderbolts and Lightnings. The P 47 looks like an attitude, looking at you and saying "Come get some"

  • @ScoopsTV
    @ScoopsTV 6 месяцев назад +1

    All of the top ten p47 aces survived the war

  • @Grant-is2ge
    @Grant-is2ge Год назад +1

    This has always been my favorite Fighter/Attack aircraft of all time. Devastating fire power.

  • @franksgattolin8904
    @franksgattolin8904 Год назад +1

    What a magnificent piece of machinery the 47’ is. If I had to serve in theUSAAF as a fighter pilot I’d do my best to saddle up in the beauty.

  • @edstanislaw2273
    @edstanislaw2273 Год назад +3

    Best of ww 2 outstanding aircraft

  • @aegontargaryen9322
    @aegontargaryen9322 Год назад +1

    The pilots must have been reassured somewhat knowing the P-47 had 8 .50cal machine guns . I believe they carried a lot more ammo than the mustang .
    God bless all those pilots

  • @lyndonhicks5715
    @lyndonhicks5715 Год назад +1

    I've always loved the p 47 if I was going to do some fighting that would have been my first choice

  • @DavidRLentz-b7i
    @DavidRLentz-b7i 2 месяца назад +1

    David R Lentz, Columbus, Ohio, USA (Monday, 5 August, 2024)
    An interesting historical overview of a remarkable combat aircraft and its context in the turn of events in the Second World War.
    At 1:40:50, the narrator reports that the U.S. Army’s Republic P-47 Thunderbolt Fighter-Bomber in the advance “catapulted” off the flight decks of the U.S. Navy’s light and escort aircraft carriers in the fleet. This is historically erroneous, for two reasons: 1) our flattops as yet had no such catapult technology, and 2) the Army’s ground-based æroplanes lacked the rugged construction essential for carrier operations. Propeller-driven aircraft even as large as the North American Aviation B-25 Mitchell USAAF Medium Bomber in their preparation to launch simply revved their engines to full power, then released their wheel breaks to rumble down the deck, finally slipping into the air as they cleared the forward end of the ship. Not till the first combat jets, much heavier and considerably more powerful than their piston-engine predecessors, did the Navy recognise the necessity for further assistance in sending into the air their newest flying machines, sometime after the Korean War of 1950-1953 (source: “Armaments & Innovations: The Steam-Powered ‘Cat’,” author, Norman Friedman [Naval History, December 2016 Vol 30, No 6]). [Note: RobertGraziose reports that Navy crews "were catapulting jets off of carriers During the Korean War not just after it. The F9F had to be catapulted."]
    Coincidentally, the Navy on board its newest aircraft carriers, the Gerald R. Ford-class, has been in the process of shifting to even more advanced technology: Electro-Magnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) (source: “Why the Navy is switching from ‘goddamned steam’ catapults,” author, Ellen Mitchell [The Hill. Defense, 16 May, 2017, 4:17 pm EDT]).

    • @RobertGraziose
      @RobertGraziose 9 дней назад

      Yes a navy aircraft has to be tough for carrier landings. But Doolittles B25s could never have landed on that carrier. Landing is the part that needed that Iron Works toughness. You do need it for catapult launches, but as you said there were no catapult back then. Thy came about with th jet age, and the Panther.

    • @RobertGraziose
      @RobertGraziose 9 дней назад +1

      They were catapulting jets off of carriers During the Korean War not just after it . The F9F had to be catapulted. See the movie About Korea naval operations, The Bridges At Toko Ri. William Holden, Grace Kelly, Micky Rooney. 1954.

  • @jpotter2086
    @jpotter2086 Год назад +1

    "Look out for them twin-engine rocket ships, boys!"
    "Aww, cap'n that's just science fiction ..."

  • @huwzebediahthomas9193
    @huwzebediahthomas9193 Год назад +2

    Monster of an engine. Twin Wasps...

  • @R.boomhower
    @R.boomhower 2 месяца назад +1

    The P47D was a more formidable weapon than the Sky raider. With a little mire modifications could have extended service as a dive bomber in Viet Nam

  • @gustaf3
    @gustaf3 Год назад +2

    What? "Look out for twin engine rocket ships" (10:15).🚀

  • @rustysphotography
    @rustysphotography 4 месяца назад

    Any idea what the location is of the 47s and the lightnings in this . Both flew out near me from RAF Atcham . The 47d is an amazing beast , packed a punch and took a beating well . the razor back seemed the safer option with the armour behind the pilot , however i would have designed it to hinge open or remove the canopy completely in an emergency . I have heard many pilot accounts of a stuck canopy and i imagine hits from behind would easily trap a pilot in a bailout situation ,

  • @angelfernandez-mp9br
    @angelfernandez-mp9br Год назад +1

    *Bonitos vídeos*

  • @stevengabriel3269
    @stevengabriel3269 Год назад +1

    And yet still, the Thunderbolt II, the A-10, a flying tank, isn't considered 'sexy' enough to be retained...

  • @jhare18
    @jhare18 Год назад +2

    P47 & A 10s

  • @douglasmiller8607
    @douglasmiller8607 11 месяцев назад +1

    Why if the F-6 Hellcats and F-4 Corsairs also had the PW-2800 with superchargers (sometimes 2) why didn't they have the high speed as the P-47??

    • @ScoopsTV
      @ScoopsTV 6 месяцев назад

      They didn't have the same turbo supercharger , the corsair was almost as fast

  • @powerkor
    @powerkor Год назад +1

    the jugg will fuxu-up

  • @gort8203
    @gort8203 Год назад

    But wait, I didn't see anything about how the commanding generals refused to allow P-47s to use drop tanks so as to prove bombers didn't need escort. That myth is all over the internet, so I hope some of its adherents see this film.

  • @jasperremmelink4434
    @jasperremmelink4434 2 месяца назад

    hm emden just 10 miles from here

  • @MBCGRS
    @MBCGRS 6 месяцев назад

    The P 47 Thunderbolt was never called 'The Jug' during WW2. Commonly referred to as the T Bird or T Bolt. But you can't find any original source material the uses the word 'Jug'.

  • @RussellBond-b3z
    @RussellBond-b3z Год назад

    I'm sorry but is the veteran B old robotic voice sound so bolshit to me but it hurts

  • @MarkSmith-js2pu
    @MarkSmith-js2pu 3 месяца назад

    Fake sounds for effect suck

  • @vrosi1963
    @vrosi1963 Год назад +2

    I did not see anything about Robert S Johnson ????????????????