MANOVA - SPSS (part 2)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024
  • I perform and interpret a MANOVA in SPSS in two ways. First, the more common method using the GUI. Then, the more sophisticated and insightful way through syntax which allows for an understanding of the discriminant function that is created by the MANOVA procedure. Anyone who makes it to the end of this video series is a champion. Multivariate Analysis of Variance

Комментарии • 29

  • @how2stats
    @how2stats  13 лет назад +6

    The reference is:
    Huberty, C. J., & Petoskey, M. D. (2000). Multivariate analysis of variance and covariance. In H. Tinsley and S. Brown (Eds.) Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling. New York: Academic Press.
    you can read a full write-up of the MANOVA results on the how2stats webpage. I can't put the link here, unfortunately, but if you type: MANOVA reporting how2stats' into google, you should find it.

  • @AdrienSaint
    @AdrienSaint 9 лет назад +15

    "[...] Then choose LSD it's the more powerful way [...]"
    I hope I don't have to use that to make sense of my data!

  • @how2stats
    @how2stats  13 лет назад

    glidza,
    My hunch is that you have a multicolinearity problem between your dependent variables; however, this may only be apparent within one of your groups. So, you'd have to look at the correlations between your dependent variables for each group (or better, loot at Tolerance via multiple regression). If you have multicolinearity, you'll likely have to drop one of your dependent variables (or combine two variables into one).

  • @synoptik82
    @synoptik82 9 лет назад

    that's a fantastic series of vids! many thanks for your kind effort!

  • @gordondraskic4348
    @gordondraskic4348 7 лет назад +3

    Hi, thanks for the great video!
    Can you please tell what should one do if he gets this warning for Box's M:
    "Box's Test of Equality of Covariance Matrices is not computed because there are fewer than two nonsingular cell covariance matrices"
    Is it still ok to procede with the interpretation of the results or something needs to be changed?
    Thanks!

    • @emanm3198
      @emanm3198 4 года назад

      Hi, did you get an answer for your question?? thanks

    • @gordondraskic4348
      @gordondraskic4348 4 года назад +1

      @@emanm3198 it was so long ago that I don't even remember.

  • @shubhdabhosle5088
    @shubhdabhosle5088 7 лет назад +1

    What if the value of Box M test is .000 ? should I proceed further ?

  • @onurkarlk8068
    @onurkarlk8068 4 года назад

    Hello Sir, thank you for the video. I wanna ask you that why did not you calculate the mean for those 9 variables (creating 3 means of intelligence scale)?

  • @mariushulck4543
    @mariushulck4543 8 лет назад

    Nice Video "King of the Mod"!

  • @sittingduck3405
    @sittingduck3405 13 лет назад +1

    Thx for these videos - they really are amazing!
    I was just wondering where I find the references for the use a significans level of 0.005 in Box's M (2:37)?
    Thx in advance, and thx for sharing! :-)

  • @1melisab
    @1melisab 4 года назад

    Do you have a source for variances being within 3x the value? Great video, this is getting me through my dissertation!

  • @jorgediaz333
    @jorgediaz333 7 лет назад

    Teacher, I get error when performing the MANOVA.
    Warning
    Equality testing of Box covariance matrices has not been performed because there are less than two covariance matrices of non-singular squares.
    The post hoc tests for College will not be performed because the term error has zero degrees of freedom.
    4,91 4,31 4,51
    4,20 4,27 4,24
    4,31 3,94 4,32
    5,13 5,88 7,49
    4,40 5,84 7,37
    6,16 4,70 7,42
    4,21 5,76 4,30
    5,24 6,11 4,85
    6,13 4,16 4,44
    4,19 4,27 4,15
    5,00 4,12 4,22
    4,99 4,11 4,56
    4,70 4,18 4,08
    4,24 3,83 3,97
    7,45 5,11 5,60
    4,35 5,14 7,38
    7,90 5,72 7,45
    4,23 4,03 7,40
    5,46 4,53 7,31
    5,35 4,44 7,37
    5,59 7,56 7,45
    Thanks...

  • @hunter2036
    @hunter2036 9 лет назад

    Hey how2stats, First of all thank you for this helpful video!
    I have a survey with 7 pages, for each page this input is given:
    -One multiple choice question(with 3 options)
    -3x Likert scale(1-7), where you have to indicate level of trust for each mc-option.
    I want to know if there is a significant preference for one of the 3 multiple choice options + if this is due the level of trust. I'm not sure but do I need a MANOVA for this? If not what would be the best way? thanks!

  • @nikjosafatow4167
    @nikjosafatow4167 2 года назад

    Hey what is the reference for the sig 0.005?

  • @funcyrus
    @funcyrus 9 лет назад

    Hi, Where can I find the example data so I can follow along? Great video, thanks!

  • @bahia112011
    @bahia112011 12 лет назад

    hi, i have the same problems as Glidza's., is it because i hvae 3 DVs (dependent variable) and 4 IVs (independent variables) where this IVs are 4 levels. (IVs are locations , with 4 different locations). ? great big thanks for any advices.

  • @kalyanikrishnan7524
    @kalyanikrishnan7524 9 лет назад

    I had a quick question about interpreting covariance matrices when you generate them using SPSS Analyze function...Do you have a reference I can cite for the 1:3 ratio as the criterion for retaining the assumption of equal covariances? Also, I am assuming that I should reject the null if p=.005 for Box's M although in your write up you say the guidelines are to reject if p

    • @vanjamedozg
      @vanjamedozg 4 года назад

      Did you perhaps find the reference for using 1:3 ratio as a criterion for homogeneity of variances? @how2stats

  • @TokenFun105
    @TokenFun105 11 лет назад

    do the criticisms of Box's M also apply in Univariate split-plot ANOVA (2x7 design)? should one also adjust p value to p

  • @elinezekveld3898
    @elinezekveld3898 8 лет назад

    How do I perform a MANOVA for a within participants design?

  • @mariaavitia4675
    @mariaavitia4675 5 лет назад +1

    I know this video is 8 years old, but do you have the reference for Box's test of covariance? about using the .005 significance level.

    • @how2stats
      @how2stats  5 лет назад +1

      Yes, I provided the reference in Chapter 11 of my (free) textbook: www.how2statsbook.com.

    • @mariaavitia4675
      @mariaavitia4675 5 лет назад

      @@how2stats thanks you

  • @vinscha
    @vinscha 11 лет назад

    thanks for your video!

  • @ThaPingu
    @ThaPingu 12 лет назад

    2:17 yours is lower then .05? hmm iam not getting something xd

  • @LienturAlcamanCurivil
    @LienturAlcamanCurivil 5 лет назад

    Good video