VAR crucial in Cincinnati, Red Cards in LA and Montréal!!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024
- Andrew Wiebe is back for another edition of Instant Replay as he breaks down the most controversial plays of the weekend.
📺 Watch every match with MLS Season Pass on Apple TV: apple.co/MLS
The 🐐 plays here. Join The Messi Insider for insider news, early access to Messi promotions and more: www.mlssoccer....
➡️ Subscribe Now: / mls
➡️ Follow us on:
- TikTok: www.tiktok.com...
- Instagram: / mls
- Twitter: / mls
- Like us on Facebook: / mls
➡️ Para Español:
- Instagram: / mlses
- Twitter: / mlses
- Facebook: espanol.mls
For more information about MLS, go to the league's official website: www.MLSsoccer.com
#mls #highlights #mlsseasonpass
The defender falls into Pedro's left leg bringing him down. Seems pretty clear to me
This is one of those scenarios we keep seeing in professional soccer/football in the Sounders game where it might have been a penalty but when a player is trying so desperately hard to sell it, it makes the referees job so incredibly difficult to know what is real. If acting and selling fouls worked their way out of the game the refs would be more inclined to give borderline cases like that
How come there was no instant replay for match day 24 & 25?
Name some controversial calls from those matchdays
Failure to play advantage (twice) in the Sounders game
@@vincebadagnani181kinda small potatoes lol
@@SubmachineOPVrioni goal being called offside in his own half
@@vincebadagnani181 Why am I not surprised that a Seattle minor incident is what is brought up?
2:35 - Weibe says that it's a pretty cynical foul deserving of a second yellow, but when STL does that to SKC, it's shoulder to shoulder lmao
Tbh i think Fafa kinda got screwed on the handball, but he scored eventually so I'm happy lol
We're stretching 'clear and obvious' just way too far when one camera angle shows the ball behind a hand, no discernable change in spin or trajectory, and no instinctive reaction from the player that often gives away an inadvertent touch. If there was another camera angle showing the touch, I would be more comfortable with this call, but to me this looks like the VAR crew assumed a touch with no evidence, one which, if it even happened, had only the tiniest effect on the path the ball took and was clearly non-deliberate.
@@brucemcintyre6088Just like the Jonathan Rodriguez “handling” the previous week. No angle showed contact definitively, and the ball’s motion was consistent with chest rather than arm.
Yet another week showing that MLS owners need to get more cameras in the stadiums. I know they want to be cheap and aren't going to pay for automated offsides and goal line tech, but at least get more and better cameras so we're playing less of the "well it probably was, but we don't have a good camera angle" game.
I'd like to see more cameras as well, but I just don't see the ROI. MLS owners are in the entertainment business, and unless the additional cameras put butts in seats or sell more merch, I don't know how it pays for itself. There's certainly no guarantee that the very small number of extra correct decisions will affect those metrics, or even that any particular decision will benefit their franchise's outcome. I think the best shot may be in leveraging the 2026WC, where those venues will get semi-automated offside. (I don't see GLT in MLS ever - semi-automated offside should make that obsolete.)
@@johnmcgimpsey1825 Not all owners are in the entertainment business. Fisher in San Jose is in the business of letting real owners spend money to make money for the league while he sits back and does just enough not to banned from ownership somehow. He's bled Oakland for 20 years and when that pot dried up he got a deal with Las Vegas. His teams are hardly entertaining.
But, yeah, otherwise it's probably a decent assessment.
Would be nice if this video was longer. I love the look at the controversial calls.
Imma be completely honest I saw nothing on the VAN handball.
The Palencia 2nd yellow wasnt as controversial as the mistaken identity on Jesus Murillo...should have been a red on Segura, not Murillo!
I swear, the VAR is consistently asleep for Sounders games. That is easily one of the top 10 worst calls or no calls I have ever seen in any sport. There is zero justification for no penalty and no red card. I see a grab and a lunge and crunch straight into and through the back of the leg with no play on the ball.There is no other way to see it. That is a a potential leg breaking tackle and should have been an easy red card decision on the field.
That was a clear pk in the Seattle game, and definitely not a handball in the Vancouver game, i don't see enough evidence that it is a handball for them to overturn the call on the field
ATL player Gregerson curved his run away from the player who kicked the ball across him, he doesn't have to just let him get the ball back. Gregerson has position on the ball compared to other player, he simply stood his ground. Not even a foul.
I did more imo. He is pushing with his arm. Not a yellow normally, but on a counter-attack? I think so. Then again, I am from Montreal, so I would :-)
@@Dirk462 ATL player has a right to stain to their ground. Every player puts their arm up to push off other players. Even your own player did it. Don't forget your own player kicked the ball to the opposite side of the Atlanta player. This is less about the Atlanta player going into the path of the Montreal player.
@@stephanh2981 he can stand his ground but what he did was when the Montreal player curved to the left the Atlanta player pushed him with his arm to the ground on a counter attack. It’s a yellow to me
@@hountybunter1 I'm not so sure. The Atlanta players so much pushed him to the ground as put out his arm so that he couldn't cross back. The Montreal player knows he lost the ball so he probably has no real incentive to be strong and when the ball back he can just go down and complain. At that point the Atlanta player has the closest position on the ball and has a right to play the ball. This really seems like the referee is bailing out Montreal on this one.
@@stephanh2981 did you see the speed the other player was going? The Atlanta player probably wouldn’t gain enough speed to reach the ball before the other player. Plus the Atlanta player did shove his arm against him throwing him off balance which caused him to fall on a counter attack still a yellow
I don't know how they miss the contact on Pedro in the first half. Clearly a foul. I've seen us get pens for contact less than that. The inconsistencies are annoying.
Nice dive on the "DOGSO."
Yup. Ridiculous. MLS is built for attackers. Shoulder to shoulder is a myth
This show has fallen off It was once sponsored by chez its and 8-10 minutes every match day. Now no Sponcer and 4-6 minutes whenever he feels like it.
VAR finally helped Charlotte for once lmao
Is the Atlanta red card not a shoulder to shoulder tackle? Is his arm raising up making it more of a push?
It has to be shoulder to shoulder AND making an attempt to play the ball. In this case, he just plays the man. It's a clear foul, and it does stop a promising attack, so it has to be a yellow.
@@toddwright662 Shielding the ball is playing the ball. The Montreal player kicked the ball to the opposite side of ATL player, has to go through ATL player to get there. ATL player even curved run AWAY from Montreal player not toward. If the goal was to take the Montreal player out then why curve away? It's not illegal to stand your ground.
Arango not being in here is crazy. Should’ve been a red.
Instant Replay takes a couple weeks off and gives us another short video 🙃
It missed 1 week.
What would you have liked to see last week?
What would you have added to this week?
Or is it just more fun to criticize without content?
@@MrCho14 if one follows for content and it's not given, why follow.
Hence the unsubscribe
MLS coverage is pathetic compared to the boring sport of baseball
@@MrCho14 btw, they missed TWO weeks
@@jaydeejohnson7 The prior one reviewed games from June 29 and came out the week of July 1. This one came out July 15. That leave ONE week in between where there was nothing released.
And really, the attitude that they owe you something is incredible. Most real soccer fans were paying attention to the Eurocup and Copa anyway. I'm sure they're really worried about someone with your attitude unsubscribing.
👍🏾
How about the pen that should’ve been called for Diego Rubio for Austin FC vs Seattle?
That should have been a yellow for simulation.
🤿
Nope that wasn't even a foul. If anything it would go against Austin for diving.