Can China's Economy Survive Trump 2.0?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 1,9 тыс.

  • @MrRedsjack
    @MrRedsjack 10 дней назад +1404

    Higher tariffs would push Chinese factories to move some parts of production, like final assembly in places like Vietnam, Thailand, Cambodia and other asian nations. Making the item 90% in china but finishing it abroad to escape the sanctions. So the impact would likely be limited but it would greatly benefit other developing countries around it.

    • @ru2225
      @ru2225 10 дней назад +224

      They do this using Mexico already🤣

    • @yensteel
      @yensteel 10 дней назад +87

      Even US made stuff is like that.

    • @jeremiahbell6129
      @jeremiahbell6129 10 дней назад +77

      Other countries will also fill the gap. Indonesia and India are already producing many goods that the Chinese market isn't able to provide cheaply anymore.

    • @AEgir347
      @AEgir347 10 дней назад +70

      And american citizens will pay the tarrifs as they did during the last trump presidency which saw a decrease in spending power and a decrease in GDP directly because of the tarrifs he imposed.

    • @KamBar2020
      @KamBar2020 10 дней назад +13

      SLAVA 🇹🇼

  • @uplink-on-yt
    @uplink-on-yt 10 дней назад +1062

    "We will hurt th Chinese economy!"
    "How?"
    "By ruining their primary market: America."

    • @akirathedog777
      @akirathedog777 9 дней назад +7

      Mansplaining.

    • @armandoventura9043
      @armandoventura9043 9 дней назад +1

      And then China put its factories in Mexico

    • @azliaheaven
      @azliaheaven 9 дней назад +112

      🤣🤣🤣 USA literally depends on some of the cheap chinese products and commodities. I don't think the internal manufacturing replacement plan is going to workout as USA wants.

    • @diegoz_74
      @diegoz_74 9 дней назад +68

      ​@@azliaheaventrump is also against raising the minimum wage so we cooked

    • @akirathedog777
      @akirathedog777 9 дней назад +14

      @@azliaheaven are you profesionally ignorant?
      chinese wages are rising and its no longer the most competitive country for cheap manufacturing, thats being taken over by mexico in nearshoring and companies will still offshore to south africa, bangladesh, philipines etc.

  • @currawong60911368
    @currawong60911368 10 дней назад +679

    Tariff is a tax. On consumers. So a sales tax. First politician I've seen get elected on a promise to increase taxes.

    • @0bsmith0
      @0bsmith0 10 дней назад +107

      Brexit..

    • @yofedstyhrega4594
      @yofedstyhrega4594 9 дней назад +36

      He also said he was going to reduce tax and reduce the American debt. Idk if he has any idea or listened to a single meeting he's been part of to get things so wrong.

    • @azliaheaven
      @azliaheaven 9 дней назад +100

      -"i promise to raise taxes and cut subsides, not for the rich but for the rest of you"
      -gets elected with unprecedented support.

    • @SeverusFelix
      @SeverusFelix 9 дней назад +11

      He's always been a sly one.

    • @WorldIsWierd
      @WorldIsWierd 9 дней назад +8

      what about the retaliatory tariffs that china puts on america good would by that logic ruin their economy?

  • @VannrithSourisVa
    @VannrithSourisVa 10 дней назад +1234

    in the end, American consumers will pay more.

    • @nathanielclaw2841
      @nathanielclaw2841 10 дней назад +288

      @@jameschalkwig787 what financial stability? tariffs on all imports will wreck the economy and cause inflation to return at full force

    • @MustraOrdo
      @MustraOrdo 10 дней назад +88

      @@jameschalkwig787 Who/What guarantees that?

    • @blondelp8451
      @blondelp8451 10 дней назад

      @@jameschalkwig787 Biden added 15+ millions jobs. Trump lost 3 millions jobs. Facts.

    • @Gigachad101-i8g
      @Gigachad101-i8g 10 дней назад +124

      Americans voted for Trump to fix the economy but his policies would ironically make it worse 🤣🤣
      Since when USA has been manufacturing locally to impose such tariffs on other Nations
      Manufacturers would simply place the burden of inflation on the heads of end consumers 🤡

    • @tiglishnobody8750
      @tiglishnobody8750 10 дней назад +22

      @@jameschalkwig787 You know that USA is more dependent on import than export and crackdown on import with triaff is sound like best idea ever

  • @claireNymans
    @claireNymans День назад +511

    "Okay, so I’ve been stacking my pennies (and by pennies, I mean $223k in my emergency fund, lol) and now I’m ready to dip into investing. But can someone explain to me how I’m supposed to feel about Trump 2.0 potentially throwing shade at China’s economy? Like, is this my sign to go all-in on U.S. stocks, or do I hedge my bets globally? Someone throw me a bone here."

    • @NancyFranciss
      @NancyFranciss День назад +3

      "Nice stack there, my dude! But honestly, it’s all noise until you’ve got a solid strategy. I used to overthink this stuff too until I brought in a financial advisor. Best decision ever. A good one can help you navigate the chaos without losing sleep. Trust me."

    • @VeronicaOlivers
      @VeronicaOlivers День назад +1

      Y’all are making good points, but finding the right financial advisor feels harder than picking stocks. Any tips on where to even start? I need someone legit who can make my money work while I figure out what all this Trump-China drama means

    • @NancyFranciss
      @NancyFranciss День назад +4

      "There are a handful of CFAs. I’ve experimented with a few over the past years, but I’ve stuck with ‘Linda Aretha Reeves’ for some years now, and her performance has been consistently impressive. She’s known in her field-look her up."

    • @claireNymans
      @claireNymans День назад

      Checked out Linda Aretha Reeves, and wow, she looks like exactly what I need to get my financial act together. Thanks for the solid recommendation!

    • @MollyShorters
      @MollyShorters День назад +1

      Watched Linda Aretha on a Bloomberg Finance Summit four years ago, and her presentation was pure gold. She definitely knows her stuff-good luck!

  • @JoeJon-o6l
    @JoeJon-o6l 10 дней назад +497

    so is china economy collapses yet? you guys been saying it will collapses since 2016, that is the longest 30 days ever btw

    • @jumbomuffin1316
      @jumbomuffin1316 10 дней назад

      Maybe look at the economic reports and you’ll see just have the Chinese economy is. It won’t collapse because of the population but growth is questionable, especially considering how much the communist party is hiding

    • @joyfrog123
      @joyfrog123 9 дней назад

      as long as Gordon Chang and his anti china goons still roam the internet, expect more of those monthly china collapsing videos

    • @MagicWandn
      @MagicWandn 9 дней назад

      really thought tldr and every other european were gushing with glea even up to a year ago about how China is gonna pass the USA as the next super power and the next century is the china century. LOL

    • @giantWario
      @giantWario 9 дней назад

      ...Yes it has already collapsed. Their real estate crash is already as bad as the 2008 crash was here and their deflation is reaching levels only previously seen during the Great Depression. And that's according to their official released figures, who knows what the real figures are.
      Just because we don't really care that it's happening doesn't mean it's not happening.

    • @zannierzan9634
      @zannierzan9634 9 дней назад

      It doesn't need to collapse for the working class to suffer. By getting high on capitalism and treating workers poorly, socialism is anything but pipe dream in China, especially the inequality is somehow even worse than the US.
      If China won the trade war and dominated the global economy, the true victor would be capitalism.

  • @shack2800
    @shack2800 8 дней назад +29

    People have a bad habit of thinking one singular thing will tank an entire country

    • @tlocksl84
      @tlocksl84 День назад

      because most people think very small

  • @yensteel
    @yensteel 10 дней назад +915

    Survive? Yes. Suffer? Yes.

    • @NCR-National-Reclamation-Gov
      @NCR-National-Reclamation-Gov 10 дней назад +35

      Collapse? Yes.

    • @waynegore5291
      @waynegore5291 10 дней назад +93

      Masturbation? Yes.

    • @Nostrama
      @Nostrama 10 дней назад +100

      Hotel? Trivago

    • @peppefailla1630
      @peppefailla1630 10 дней назад +14

      ​@@Nostrama👺👺👺👺👺👺 Bros a man of culture

    • @KimGameDev
      @KimGameDev 10 дней назад

      CCP is doomed for failure. They hate the Chinese people so why should the Chinese people tolerate CCP anymore?

  • @Intriguing444
    @Intriguing444 10 дней назад +509

    Can the US economy survive Trump's isolationist strategies?

    • @User122-ty
      @User122-ty 10 дней назад +53

      Can but will end up on the level of Brazil

    • @landenjones9374
      @landenjones9374 10 дней назад

      Bro the whole point of the tariffs are trumps attempt to bring manufacturing back to America and cut income taxes that's really not a bad idea and many president's have been trying to do this just none have been this extreme about it.

    • @shinji1264
      @shinji1264 10 дней назад +40

      ​@@User122-tygood y'all already have enough diversity to look like Brazil population

    • @butthebitebitbit
      @butthebitebitbit 10 дней назад +10

      @@User122-ty VAI BRASIL

    • @User122-ty
      @User122-ty 10 дней назад +5

      @@shinji1264 we speak only about the weight in the world economy.
      Brazil is big but ...

  • @PASCALDAB
    @PASCALDAB 7 дней назад +1072

    In these uncertain times, it's more important than ever to have a solid understanding of how to manage your finances, invest wisely and navigate economic downturns. But my primary concern is how to grow my reserve of $240k which has been sitting duck since forever with zero to no gains, sure I'm all in on the long term game, but with my savings are lying waste to inflation and my portfolio losing gains everyday, I need a remedy.

    • @viviancarolgioao
      @viviancarolgioao 7 дней назад +2

      If you need advice, consider speaking with a financial advisor. Don't get me wrong, you can do it on your own, but financial advisors have a lot more knowledge and expertise in this area.

    • @DonaldStokes-p
      @DonaldStokes-p 7 дней назад +1

      you are completely right, Advisors have information and paths that are not disclosed to the public.. I profited $560k in 2023 under the tutelage of my Fiduciary-counselor. Am I selling? Absolutely not.. I am going to sit back and observe how this all plays out.

    • @SeanTalkoff
      @SeanTalkoff 7 дней назад +1

      This is huge! think you can point me towards the direction of your advisor? been looking at advisory management myself.. seeking ways to invest and make more money with the uncertainty in the economy.

    • @DonaldStokes-p
      @DonaldStokes-p 7 дней назад +1

      My CFA ’’ Sharon Ann Meny, a renowned figure in her line of work. I recommend researching her credentials further. She has many years of experience and is a valuable resource for anyone looking to navigate the financial market..

    • @SeanTalkoff
      @SeanTalkoff 7 дней назад

      Thanks, i did a quick web search and i found Sharon, i hope she responds to my mail.

  • @anuragsinha2013
    @anuragsinha2013 3 дня назад +6

    Nice way to cope hard, wishing about someone else's failure rather than wishing for you own success.

  • @dannydenison6253
    @dannydenison6253 9 дней назад +72

    Tariffs are pointless unless they're targeted with a substantial industrial policy. Which is not something America has had for a long time

    • @jackhumphries1087
      @jackhumphries1087 8 дней назад +1

      The point is to encourage more production within America, rather than buying from other countries

    • @svenrio8521
      @svenrio8521 8 дней назад +1

      ​@jackhumphries1087 Yes which is why funding ALSO has to be given to new factories. You can't have one without the other

    • @thetaomega7816
      @thetaomega7816 8 дней назад +6

      ​@svenrio8521 IRA lead to just that? Manufacturing is booming in US

    • @buddermonger2000
      @buddermonger2000 7 дней назад

      America gained one under Biden, who largely was continuing Trump's policies

    • @sentryion3106
      @sentryion3106 7 дней назад

      I mean that’s what Biden is doing. He restricted high tech exports to China while giving massive incentives to companies to build high tech manufacturing in the U.S. with the chips act.
      A shame that the U.S. voters love vibe over their own interests

  • @joelongardner1571
    @joelongardner1571 10 дней назад +220

    There are two main points that you're missing on why China does not want to provide stimulus to help support the economy.
    1. The CCP is afraid of inflation after bringing 800 million people out of poverty. If hundreds of millions of people in the countryside suddenly don't have enough money to eat, this could be a threat to their power.
    2. Corruption is still a large problem in China and if trillions of dollars worth of stimulus begins to flow, a significant amount of that money will be embezzled and laundered into western banks while certain officials disappear into western society.

    • @KamBar2020
      @KamBar2020 10 дней назад

      Slava TSMC 🇹🇼 Heroyam MediaTek 🦾

    • @LeonardTavast
      @LeonardTavast 10 дней назад

      China just announced a $1.4T stimulus to keep cities from going bancrupt. The CCP is trying to keep the property bubble from affecting other sectors of the economy.

    • @BIZKIT551
      @BIZKIT551 10 дней назад

      First of all 800 million people out of poverty is propaganda published by the CCP. People are still poor in a lot of places in China and all they did was lowering the income line below what these people were already earning to make it look like like the CCP lifted people out of poverty when in fact they made poor people even poorer. There is a reason why Chinese people are trying to move to HK or if they can, they try to escape to a place where they can earn a proper living.
      Second point is true and CCP as a whole is very very corrupt. Xi made himself president for life and thrown his opposition in jail or forced them to to join him.

    • @lagrangewei
      @lagrangewei 9 дней назад +32

      if this is true than China would not have made stimulus in 2008. the reality is China is just waiting for the right timing, it is pointless to do stimulus when US policy is unclear, how do you know where to invest in? so obiviously they are waiting to see what the gold is. as for million not having enough food, China has more than enough food surplus for months. China produces twice as much food as India does and they have the same population. food is just a bullshit narrative created by the west that only look at import data and doesn't understand alot of that is ending up as canned export. canned food that is easy for the government to stockpile and distribute too.

    • @AAAAAA-tj1nq
      @AAAAAA-tj1nq 9 дней назад +4

      joelongardner how are the americans enjoying chinese made blue crystal fent? rising inflation rate, rising fuel cost, american grocery stores have to lock up items to prevent shoplifiting and you can shoplift up to $950 without getting punished

  • @Elijah-e6v
    @Elijah-e6v 5 дней назад +82

    Thank you for recommending Sarah Jennine Davis on one of your videos. I reached out to her and investing with her has been amazing.

    • @anilhettiarachci8467
      @anilhettiarachci8467 5 дней назад

      Wow, congratulations on your impressive investment success! Your discipline and focus on delayed gratification is truly inspiring. I'm curious, what are some of the key factors that you consider when making investment decisions? Do you have any tips for those of us who are just starting to dip our toes into the world of investing? Thanks for sharing your story!

    • @สมรักษ์อินทร์ตา-ม7ฑ
      @สมรักษ์อินทร์ตา-ม7ฑ 5 дней назад

      Do you mind sharing info on the adviser who
      assisted you? I'm 39 now and would love to
      grow my portfolio and plan my retirement

    • @Elijah-e6v
      @Elijah-e6v 5 дней назад

      @@สมรักษ์อินทร์ตา-ม7ฑ Sarah Jennine Davis is highly recommended
      You most likely should get her basic info when you search her on your browser.

    • @FreyaFreya3
      @FreyaFreya3 5 дней назад

      ​@@Elijah-e6vHow do I access her ? I really need this

    • @Elijah-e6v
      @Elijah-e6v 5 дней назад

      +156

  • @hydroac9387
    @hydroac9387 10 дней назад +332

    Famously, Trump own merch (the Make America Great Again hats and the like) is made in China. Oh, the irony...

    • @GabibboReall
      @GabibboReall 9 дней назад

      Famously, This has been proven to literally be false. and is only true to what is NOT made by Trump and the "Made in China" Maga merch is sold by third parties. shut up and get facts straight bub

    • @halahmilksheikh
      @halahmilksheikh 9 дней назад +80

      They aren't. Fake ones yes but they ahve their own factory in Carson CA

    • @leoym1803
      @leoym1803 9 дней назад +54

      @@halahmilksheikh Hey man, careful with facts here, they don't like them around these places!

    • @evilsanta8585
      @evilsanta8585 9 дней назад

      @@halahmilksheikhbro the Make America Great Again was made in a Chinese factory and Trump bought th lot for $300k. People tracked it down

    • @Student17625
      @Student17625 9 дней назад +1

      The USA Can't manufacture everything it imports from china, so in the end, US consumers will have to pay high prices for cheaper goods because the Federal government will pocket that tariff for itself. Tariffs make the government rich and citizens poor.

  • @billyboi955
    @billyboi955 7 дней назад +5

    Obviously protecting Tesla with the 200% increase on electric vehicles

  • @jackofnone500
    @jackofnone500 9 дней назад +36

    1) China has been diversifying its export market 2) Unless US manufacturers can innovate and push cost down, tariffs will result in inflation and limited growth 3) China set manufacturing bases in strategic countries such as in Mexico to avoid tarrifs

    • @crosslink1493
      @crosslink1493 8 дней назад +1

      China is tempering that a bit. Best example is pulling back from letting their companies do big investments in EV/hybrid auto manufacturing to serve the European markets. Best reason I've heard for this is they want to keep domestic manufacturing going on this key (for them) market so as not lay off a lot of Chinese employees. Also the possibility of just doing final assembly in Euro-focused factories vs finding local parts suppliers at those new factories. Good example (although just from my personal observations) of this final assembly tactic are the television brands Hisense and TCL, their TVs I was looking at last weekend were labeled 'Made in Vietnam.'

    • @buddermonger2000
      @buddermonger2000 7 дней назад

      US manufacturers have been innovating and pushing costs down. So much so we brought textiles back to the US.
      Chinese export market has arguably failed in its diversification due to the low purchasing power of the countries it's trying to export to via belt and road.
      Mexico is used by both America and China for manufacturing. Realistically China moving manufacturing to Mexico is a win for America.

    • @jackofnone500
      @jackofnone500 7 дней назад

      Textile is a low complexity product while for high tech goods such as car, electronic devices, battery, solar modules US remains uncompetitive. Ofc its contributing to but not all due to cheaper labor. China is good in scaling up manufacturing technologies and ramp up productivity

    • @buddermonger2000
      @buddermonger2000 7 дней назад

      @jackofnone500 That's actually my point. The product is so low in complexity that it's basically only made using women and sewing machines, and thus incredibly sensitive to labor costs which is why it's historically been made overseas until within the last year or two.
      However, manufacturing in the US has advanced enough that it's made it cost competitive to return back to domestic shores.
      Thus, I present it as evidence of the continued advancement of American manufacturing.
      China is currently doing a lot of those middle tier goods, and it looks like the US manufacturing can now do even some of the low-end. Thus, realistically, the play for the US is to continue investment in Mexico in order to regain a "domestic" source of those technologies as they're roughly cost competitive.
      As an addendum, IIRC most cars in the US are, in fact, made in the US, but under foreign companies such as Toyota.

    • @jackofnone500
      @jackofnone500 7 дней назад

      @ and that’s exactly my point also. Its not all about cheap labour that gives China its competitive advantage. China successfully scaled up advanced manufacturing technologies that boost productivity and quality, which matter even more when it comes to higher tiered products. EV and solar module are good examples for this case

  • @endofmidnight
    @endofmidnight 9 дней назад +13

    As an American my family will be tightening our purses and pocketing our wallets. Let the great collapse begin🤦🤦‍♂️

    • @JonathanHilierChannel
      @JonathanHilierChannel 4 дня назад

      People gave been saying the world is going to end for ever mate, relax. Remember india can fill the gap in supplying many products and diversification will be good thing in the long run.

    • @124085
      @124085 3 дня назад +1

      @@JonathanHilierChannel Lmao, India, what a dependable ally

    • @JonathanHilierChannel
      @JonathanHilierChannel 3 дня назад

      @@124085 It's about diversification, over reliance on country is dangerous.

  • @abbott75
    @abbott75 10 дней назад +296

    China will be fine, can the US economy survive though?

    • @rrni2343
      @rrni2343 10 дней назад

      They wont, they outsourced a lot of industry to china, over time this creates a skill deficiency in the US and skill accumulation in China. The US is left with useless nepo babies with MBAs running things.

    • @AndyMitch-ec5iy
      @AndyMitch-ec5iy 10 дней назад

      Check the economic data and see for yourself lol. You China bots are getting desperate these days.....

    • @uchuynguyen4763
      @uchuynguyen4763 10 дней назад +36

      I feel like the US economy is too big to fail at this point. More than half of all trade in the world in done through USD

    • @theo1170
      @theo1170 10 дней назад +18

      @@uchuynguyen4763 Which as a result of us stripping Russia of all of their USD because of their siege of Ukraine. Countries around the world are getting uncomfortable with that action and are looking for alternatives. Alternatives like just simply bartering, and using gold to make up the difference.

    • @AndyMitch-ec5iy
      @AndyMitch-ec5iy 10 дней назад +22

      @@uchuynguyen4763 It's closer to 80% with USD. It's a well oiled machine. Plus when you look at innovation - for example - it is booming with AI and way ahead of anybody else.
      The country is rich in talent and capital.

  • @eliahabib5111
    @eliahabib5111 9 дней назад +32

    When you do a video on USA China relations, you might want to use a world map with the Pacific Ocean in the middle. Instead of one with Europe and Africa in the middle.
    As a bonus you can actually put the arrows where the trade is done instead of the other side of the globe.

    • @azliaheaven
      @azliaheaven 9 дней назад +1

      yeah that would actually be more helpful

    • @d_all_in
      @d_all_in 9 дней назад +3

      Eurocentric channel can't help it 😂

    • @Banigoat
      @Banigoat 9 дней назад +1

      I thought of posting that as well, but I searched if anyone had written it before

  • @N911GT2
    @N911GT2 10 дней назад +102

    @3:50 KIA is not Chinese...

    • @PacificDeep
      @PacificDeep 10 дней назад

      Yeah

    • @AEgir347
      @AEgir347 10 дней назад

      Doesn't matter, to a racist they're all asian.

    • @KamBar2020
      @KamBar2020 10 дней назад

      Slava TSMC 🇹🇼 Geroyam MediaTek 🦾

    • @Deoxsen
      @Deoxsen 10 дней назад +19

      No but it does have a manufacturing plant in China

    • @SeverusFelix
      @SeverusFelix 9 дней назад

      Yet

  • @vinniechan
    @vinniechan 10 дней назад +173

    You also need to look.at other countries.that slap tariffs on Chijese good
    Indonesia slapped a 200% tariff on chinese clothing and texiles
    Even Russia is slapping tariffs as well

    • @stevenrafa1
      @stevenrafa1 10 дней назад +73

      Yesterday, Indonesia met with the Chinese president to discuss a tariff-free agreement and increased oil production, meaning Indonesia relies more on China than China does on Indonesia.

    • @serebii666
      @serebii666 10 дней назад +44

      @@stevenrafa1 If the talks are about increased oil Production, which Indonesia is a producer of, And China is an importer of, then it would mean China relies on Indonesia more, not to mention Chinese activity in Indonesian nickel mining and processing

    • @lamn3226
      @lamn3226 10 дней назад +16

      even after that Indonesia's textile industry this year is doing pretty bad. For example one of the oldest and biggest producer just went bankrupt some weeks ago. Some asks the government to bail them out or even nationalising it

    • @KamBar2020
      @KamBar2020 10 дней назад +2

      Slava TSMC 🇹🇼

    • @dragondescendant1
      @dragondescendant1 10 дней назад +6

      ​@@KamBar2020Taiwan provincial flag.

  • @WHR0306
    @WHR0306 9 дней назад +24

    I am American and I will be honest in that I did not vote for Trump, however, here is my perspective.
    We Americans only make up 5% of the world population. We might have the largest economy right now and we may be a pop-culture powerhouse, but we will not be these things if we abandon our allies and cut ties with China. Our economy is built off of the world economy, and we need to get along to a certain extent to stay wealthy as a nation.
    If I were a European nation right now that's about to get slapped with tariffs, I'd cut ties with America and simply start trading more with the East.

    • @TheRealBruceLouis
      @TheRealBruceLouis 9 дней назад +1

      america was once an omega pop culture powerhouse, but they no longer have the same statue as they once did before as well. they are still a pop culture powerhouse, but japan, korea and even china are really slowly creeping up in terms of world pop culture power.

    • @gtwucla
      @gtwucla 9 дней назад

      Europe has the same issues with the "east." They're talking about tariffs over EVs and Germany is functionally screwed because they're sales in China are tanking due to local competition and overreliance on inputs and outputs from Russia and China. Cutting ties with the US would be economic suicide. Like it or not, things are going to be fundamentally changed with Trump's presidency but the world will essentially be held hostage for four years while the US goes through Trump's presidency but the world will essentially be held hostage for four years while the US goes through whatever Trump's going to put them through. If his administration sticks with the plans and cuts a ton of gov workers, deports mass amounts of people, dissolves the department of education, and raises tariffs, essentially torpedoing the economy by taking manual workers out, taking money via gov workers salaries, raising prices and therefore inflation, and essentially putting a cap on talent by cutting education, hopefully it gets so bad, Americans learn the meaning of consequence when it comes to politics. Maybe it'll hold us over for a couple decades and helps us long term. That's the optimistic take anyway.

    • @buddermonger2000
      @buddermonger2000 7 дней назад +3

      This is woefully inaccurate.
      First off: America has VERY few ties to the world economy. It has a trade to GDP ratio of 27%. The GLOBAL average is 63%, for Europe it's somewhere closer to 80% or 90%. Iran has a ratio of 51%. Over half of American foreign trade is within NAFTA. The only country with a lower ratio is Sudan at 2%.
      Secondly, for the European market, China is still a threat given that it is still a power with expansionary ambitions, is anti-democratic, and is actively oppressing its population, all values antithetical to Europe.
      Thirdly, America has 5% world population but has 25% of the global economy. Still more than China, who is also actively trying to steal intellectual property in order to put you put of business and take over your market.
      There's no version of this which looks good to trade with China besides short term finances. If you're into training up your competition and trying to become politically and economically dependent, that's how you do that.

    • @WHR0306
      @WHR0306 7 дней назад

      @@buddermonger2000 Yes we do have a large GDP because we get along with others. Like I said, we don't want to be cocky and ruin it.
      As for Europe, counties like Germany and France have already begun trading more and more with China. Don't be ignorant.

    • @buddermonger2000
      @buddermonger2000 7 дней назад

      @WHR0306 Having the second lowest trade to GDP ratio in the world is not from playing nice with others, lol.
      Also, yeah, I know France and Germany already trade more with China. I just think they're stupid for doing it due to the reasons outlined above. They hate Russia, and they're trading with mega Russia.

  • @thelammas8283
    @thelammas8283 3 дня назад +2

    It will do some damage, but to the US.

  • @kylebdun3077
    @kylebdun3077 10 дней назад +101

    US companies have already said they're passing the cost of tariffs to US consumers.

    • @NilsMueller
      @NilsMueller 10 дней назад +19

      But trump said he would bring prices back down!

    • @blondelp8451
      @blondelp8451 10 дней назад

      @@NilsMueller Trump said Mexico would pay for the walls. Which idiots still believe Trump?

    • @MrFastFarmer
      @MrFastFarmer 10 дней назад +2

      That’s the idea!! USA needs to start living within its means

    • @davidcrosthwaite
      @davidcrosthwaite 10 дней назад +25

      @@MrFastFarmerThe median American couldn’t even survive let alone live within their means

    • @MrFastFarmer
      @MrFastFarmer 10 дней назад +2

      @ which is why very hard times are coming. You can’t live on credit and money printing forever.

  • @V2RocketScientist
    @V2RocketScientist 6 дней назад +3

    When trump first added tariffs, most of my Chinese vendors told me they didn't care because America is only 10% of their business. Ultimately, stopping trade is a loss for the world. The American people can't possibly make all the goods coming from China's experienced population of 1.4 billion people. More tariffs are just an excuse for domestic manufacturers to jack up their prices and make higher profits. In the long run, it might drive more work into manufacturing, a gain for blue collar work but a loss for the most intelligent people. Perhaps, China will start taking over the most sophisicated work in the world which requires the brains that we do have, and we'll ultimately become poorer from losing that edge in the market.

    • @kimchiba4570
      @kimchiba4570 3 дня назад

      81 million magas and their leader fail to understand this simple fact

  • @Goodkiwibloke
    @Goodkiwibloke 10 дней назад +95

    China will be just fine. Tariffs affect citizens of the importing country. Its not like US can switch from Chinese manufacturers to others, because the whole world has outsourced manufacturing to China over the past 20 years
    China is likely to make business difficult for US companies, through "shortages" and "delays" of critical materials

    • @sparks1792
      @sparks1792 10 дней назад +34

      It hurts both lmao. I know you guys hate trump but be serious

    • @TheBrokensaintvxvx
      @TheBrokensaintvxvx 10 дней назад +1

      Those delays will be because of Chinese goods importers not being able to afford the difference in cost, because the free market will have a 60% tax on goods imported from china.

    • @dalekrenegade2596
      @dalekrenegade2596 10 дней назад

      ​@@sparks1792
      Farmers needed billions in tax payer dollars to be bailed out because Trump's last tariff stunt. We didn't see any benefit while China just shrugged their shoulders.

    • @QALibrary
      @QALibrary 10 дней назад

      In the past under Trump, they stopped taking any orders or any contacts for soya beans and figures showed over 1% of USA farmland went bust (other farmers were brought up via shell companies when it became political (esp when farmers retired and sold up due to the links to tariffs) in turn people linked to the Chinese state took over the farmland in the USA.
      And you are totally correct as in raw supplies of materials like rare earth material - oh yes my USA that is a 200% price rise for you and you get in in a year or so maybe!

    • @vladthecon
      @vladthecon 9 дней назад +3

      it might hurt the US short term but the tariffs will convince some manufacturers to build factories in america even if it hurts our finances it is better to be less reliant on a rival for basic supplies

  • @Seanroberts-q9o
    @Seanroberts-q9o 10 дней назад +36

    Better question can America economy survive trump

    • @SelfProclaimedEmperor
      @SelfProclaimedEmperor 9 дней назад +1

      It grew strongly last time under him

    • @lja996
      @lja996 9 дней назад +15

      ​@@SelfProclaimedEmperorNo it didn't. He wasted $8 trillion and caused inflation

    • @1Orderchaos
      @1Orderchaos 9 дней назад +5

      @@SelfProclaimedEmperor "A May 2019 analysis conducted by CNBC found Trump's tariffs are equivalent to one of the largest tax increases in the U.S. in decades. Studies have found that Trump's tariffs reduced real income in the United States, as well as adversely affecting U.S. GDP."

    • @NaSaSh1087
      @NaSaSh1087 7 дней назад

      @@1Orderchaosyes but his tax cuts were atleast 4x higher than his t@riffs. And that real income one was an estimate. But the real results showed a $5500 increase in real household income in just 3 years which is the literally highest since 1960s.

    • @NaSaSh1087
      @NaSaSh1087 7 дней назад

      @@lja996you do know that most of that $7.8 trillion is bipartisan c0vid spending right? Dem house literally approved it. I don’t fully support the aid spending but you’re intentionally omitting key context.
      And yes in his first 3 years there was real household income growth, gdp growth near 3%, low mortgage rates, low inflation and nearly 500k manufacturing jobs added in 3 years reversing the decades of manufacturing decline and largest poverty reduction since 1960s.
      He literally won because of the economic nostalgia Americans have for 2017-2019.

  • @satriojumeneng7055
    @satriojumeneng7055 10 дней назад +65

    Why are explanations about US-China trade imbalance never talking about the US companies that enjoyed so much profit?????

    • @merlin5662
      @merlin5662 10 дней назад +40

      considering they quote the heritage foundation as a source for this sort of show. that should give you your answer.

    • @oscarmccoy9102
      @oscarmccoy9102 10 дней назад

      @@merlin5662what’s the heritage foundation? sounds like a white supremacy group 😂.

    • @rod9829
      @rod9829 10 дней назад +2

      Higher return to capital than labour

    • @timmmahhhh
      @timmmahhhh 10 дней назад +3

      ​@@merlin5662oh criminy, thank you for noting that.

    • @KamBar2020
      @KamBar2020 10 дней назад +1

      Never Say NEVER 😎 Justin Bieber

  • @JasonAtlas
    @JasonAtlas 10 дней назад +58

    I would not listen to the imf. If they are are ignoring their advice they can't be going that wrong.

    • @anaisanais4626
      @anaisanais4626 10 дней назад

      My country listened to them
      They screwed us over

    • @ZZWWYZ
      @ZZWWYZ 10 дней назад +8

      That's all I needed to know 😂 China gonna be alright

    • @christopherg2347
      @christopherg2347 10 дней назад +3

      "Don't listen to common sense."

    • @ryannathaniel9296
      @ryannathaniel9296 9 дней назад +13

      ​@@christopherg2347"Common sense" that cripples economies

    • @mep867
      @mep867 9 дней назад +9

      @@christopherg2347 The IMF is anything but common sense lol.

  • @TheFourFats
    @TheFourFats 9 дней назад +3

    A blanket tariff wont work, but it’s interesting to watch them try. There’s a reason certain countries manufacture things. It’s cheaper and more efficient.
    It frees up the importing countries to do more high tech, high value production instead.
    Good luck to the consumer facing higher prices on their microwaves, shoes and practically everything because the supply chain is inevitably globalised.
    Trump will be gone in 4 years, is there any guarantee these tariffs will remain in place for 5, 8, 12 years afterwards?
    Business owners aren’t going to take the risk

  • @MagarethWoods
    @MagarethWoods 9 дней назад +29

    Honestly our government has no idea how people are suffering these days. I much feel sorry for the disabled and homeless people who don't get the help they deserve, Investing in alternate income streams should be the top priority for everyone right now. especially given the global economic crisis we are currently experiencing. stocks, gold, silver, and virtual currencies are still attractive investments at the moment.

    • @NatalieDormer-or4jj
      @NatalieDormer-or4jj 9 дней назад +2

      Am looking for something to venture into on a short term basis, I really need to create an alternate source of income, what do you think I should be buying?

    • @MagarethWoods
      @MagarethWoods 9 дней назад +5

      Cryptocurrency/stock investment, but you will need a professional guide on that.

    • @MagarethWoods
      @MagarethWoods 9 дней назад +5

      Facebook 👇

    • @MagarethWoods
      @MagarethWoods 9 дней назад +5

      Evelyn C. Sanders

    • @NatalieDormer-or4jj
      @NatalieDormer-or4jj 9 дней назад +2

      Thank you so much for sharing 🙏

  • @Kwippy
    @Kwippy 9 дней назад +4

    There's never a winner in a trade war.

    • @marvinh3357
      @marvinh3357 4 дня назад

      yesn't - china could be the winner. If the us industry starts collapsing many countries will have a new go to country, china. If done wrong, china might simply take your no 1 spot within the next 4 years. And never forget, trump made a casino go bankrupt - and he is now the guy making your countries financial future.

    • @Foquro
      @Foquro 2 дня назад

      Mexico and South Asian countries: 😁

  • @symonsmith3497
    @symonsmith3497 3 дня назад +2

    Long live China.

  • @bryan0359
    @bryan0359 7 дней назад +26

    I'm glad I was introduced to forex trading and got the best teacher and mentor who helped me understand the financial market I'm grateful to Mrs Liam🙏

    • @giselastefan2180
      @giselastefan2180 7 дней назад

      I am from Miami United State🇺🇸, The difference Mrs Lucy Mary Liam makes in my life is second to none it's definitely a life changing kindness. I really appreciate her effort in my life.

    • @emilymccord7063
      @emilymccord7063 7 дней назад

      I invested $2,000 and the trade in one month making close to $20,000. I wonder where she got her analysis.

    • @Leahwilliamson124
      @Leahwilliamson124 7 дней назад

      Seeing my broker talked on RUclips, This was exactly how I got the recommendation about her for the past years. Hit $200k today. Thank you for all the knowledge and nuggets you had thrown my way over the last months. Started with $20k in July 2024

    • @carlosalberto54754
      @carlosalberto54754 7 дней назад

      I'm from Brazil 🇧🇷 I and two other of my friends tried her immediately we testified her performing wonders.

    • @bensonarmstrong7287
      @bensonarmstrong7287 7 дней назад

      Her good strategies of making large amount weekly profits for her clients are totally outstanding. Investing my $1500 with doubt and withdrawing $12,300 with happiness. I ❤️ you Lucy.

  • @lie01234
    @lie01234 2 дня назад +1

    When are we going to get a "Will China Man up and Cripple the US Economy?"

  • @Mooocheropordis
    @Mooocheropordis 10 дней назад +22

    Trump will hammer tariffs and end inflation. Like saying the sky can go under the sea.

    • @kenho-wr5ul2rh7m
      @kenho-wr5ul2rh7m 8 дней назад +1

      inflation will not leave but deteriorate as long as US keeps borrowings
      BRICS sees this problem and starts a new currency and payment system in order to reduce to rely on USD
      u borrow and create the inflation problem, u take the consequence, not by other nations

    • @reaperz5677
      @reaperz5677 3 дня назад

      @@kenho-wr5ul2rh7m So the U.S. has inflation because they borrow... in their own currency. And BRICS will supposedly solve the inflation problem by not using U.S. currency, and instead by borrowing... in their own currency.
      Yeah sorry but this is wishful thinking for people like you, that actually think BRICS means something. You can't just say "US INFLATION BECAUSE THEY BORROW FROM THEMSELVES" and then turn around and say "BRICS will have no inflation, because they will be borrowing from themselves! :)" without being laughed out of the room.

  • @pandaphil
    @pandaphil День назад

    Remember all the people who whined that we can't possibly raise the minimum wage because companies would pass the costs on to consumers? Same thing.

  • @bruce4947
    @bruce4947 10 дней назад +74

    LMAO. Tariffs will do more harm to the importing country. Economics 101.

    • @maritaschweizer1117
      @maritaschweizer1117 10 дней назад +5

      Adam Smith wrote this already 200 years ago.

    • @GabibboReall
      @GabibboReall 9 дней назад +17

      Economics 101. Autarky is better than dependency on a hostile country. (the oil industry has showed that lmao)

    • @googane7755
      @googane7755 9 дней назад

      ​​​​@@GabibboReallNo advanced economy has ever produced everything by themselves, it's simply impossible.

    • @ShadowPhoenixMaximus
      @ShadowPhoenixMaximus 9 дней назад

      Unlike the CCP with its 1/2/3/x child policy and then quick reversal. The West does plan ahead. Why would we want Chinese products that are specifically designed to destroy local businesses - via free state sponsored shipping and low prison labour manufacturing costs?
      The sooner Temu, Shein, etc companies are banned from Westerner markets the better.

    • @1Orderchaos
      @1Orderchaos 9 дней назад +1

      @@GabibboReall That is impossible. No country has everything to be self sufficient. Not even America.

  • @victorconway444
    @victorconway444 7 дней назад +1

    Yes it will. The real question is if America will survive it.

  • @Evemeister12
    @Evemeister12 9 дней назад +41

    American protectionism worked so well in the 1920s.

    • @AlexP-dz7ew
      @AlexP-dz7ew 9 дней назад +11

      Yeah… when the global economy was less interconnected and the only way to travel between continents was by ship.
      Using concepts that half worked 100+ years ago is DEFINITELY going to work now…
      Do you know what happened in 1929?

    • @seanthe100
      @seanthe100 9 дней назад

      So well that the US is still the dominant country of all of our lifetimes even 100 years later

    • @jontalbot1
      @jontalbot1 9 дней назад +18

      @@AlexP-dz7ew You don’t understand irony do you?

    • @gtwucla
      @gtwucla 9 дней назад +1

      @@jontalbot1 Could be wrong but I don't think they were disagreeing, seems like they were just elaborating?

    • @TopShot501st
      @TopShot501st 7 дней назад

      Yes, roaring 20's were a thing. Then black Friday happened in 29 ended it. Boom bust is the way of the world in capitalism.

  • @dalefutrelle1441
    @dalefutrelle1441 8 дней назад +2

    Sounds like this will delay a lot of retirements for Americans... smh

    • @freetorobandloot
      @freetorobandloot 7 дней назад

      I was hoping to retire soon but I guess I will need to wait. Will definitely won't be able to retire in the usa. cost of living is too high, unless I move to sh!thole states like Alabama, Louisiana, mississippi, etc...

  • @educacionespecialchannel3756
    @educacionespecialchannel3756 10 дней назад +24

    Wazzzup Beijing room 6:26

  • @SpazzyMcGee1337
    @SpazzyMcGee1337 8 дней назад +2

    Who is going to build all the stuff in American factories? America already has high employment.

    • @OK-hl6qd
      @OK-hl6qd 8 дней назад

      In non existent factories

    • @reaperz5677
      @reaperz5677 3 дня назад

      @@OK-hl6qd Are you this dumb to believe propaganda that the U.S. doesn't have any factories? At all?
      Really? You think the world's largest manufacturing country doesn't have ANY factories? Ok...

  • @nez_ic
    @nez_ic 10 дней назад +3

    God I hope not

  • @kianyeelee9307
    @kianyeelee9307 3 дня назад +1

    CIA media clowns are ignoring the boycott of Starbucks, McD, KFC world wide and US national debt despite printing, but choose to nibble others 😂😂😂

  • @fmitsinc9146
    @fmitsinc9146 10 дней назад +12

    Importers will prefer to pay the tariffs rather than move the manufacturing to the US. After all it costs more to produce in the states, so what's the point of risking large amount of investments to end in the same place

    • @azliaheaven
      @azliaheaven 9 дней назад

      the loss in profit is to high to just pay the tariffs

    • @fmitsinc9146
      @fmitsinc9146 9 дней назад +5

      @azliaheaven
      They'll have to raise the prices either way. As I mentioned, producing in the states costs more because of wages and regulations.

    • @oluwaseyijohnson2319
      @oluwaseyijohnson2319 9 дней назад

      So instead of exploiting chinese workers, we can provide Americans with jobs

    • @ShadowPhoenixMaximus
      @ShadowPhoenixMaximus 9 дней назад

      Manufacturers are already leaving China and have been for years. This is just another incentive to drive the last few remaining companies that believe CCP controlled China is the future out of the country.

    • @S3Cs4uN8
      @S3Cs4uN8 9 дней назад +1

      @@azliaheaven Even then they would likely move to someplace like India, Bangladesh or Vietnam where their costs would be lower, and that's only if the expense of committing to such a move would be sufficiently less than what they would have to put up with by just eating the tariffs and raising prices.

  • @robertbucks1721
    @robertbucks1721 5 дней назад +2

    Naive, Why American people spend money on Chinese goods? It is because American people short of money to be patriotic to buy expensive American goods. Uncle Sam raise tariff wont lead to patriotic American get more money, as a result, American people are still poor to spend on American goods.

    • @zacksmith5644
      @zacksmith5644 4 дня назад

      Also more tariffs mean dollar becomes unaffordable

  • @Insightful21
    @Insightful21 10 дней назад +59

    Countries with a services based economy will survive these tariffs better than their industrial counterparts.

    • @makotosaito9067
      @makotosaito9067 9 дней назад +11

      That depends a lot. Most of the times the countries that better survive a trade war are those that are self-sufficient on their primary needs, both services but also food, energy and consumer goods. As a primary example of that, the main loser of a China-US trade war is Japan, since it's not self-sufficient in almost anything its economy and people need to work normally, so it's going to suffer from the price increases from both sides.

    • @TurielD
      @TurielD 9 дней назад +5

      Wat - you think we'll be selling a lot of services to the people wrecking their own economy do you?

    • @Insightful21
      @Insightful21 9 дней назад

      @@TurielD The services at least for the UK have a largely plastic demand that I doubt will be affected by tariffs on goods.

    • @kenho-wr5ul2rh7m
      @kenho-wr5ul2rh7m 8 дней назад

      People probably forget China's trading surplus with US sharply increase after Trump's trade war in 2018
      You the American are assuming urselves too big, US-China trade only accounts for 16% of China trading capacity, China is trading 84% of its capacity with the world other than US
      In another word, u are only with 16% importance to China

  • @kimandre336
    @kimandre336 9 дней назад +2

    And America's manufacturing capacity is failing horribly. America's tariffs only make sense when the federal government is willing to recover its manufacturing sector. So far, it's turning worse.

    • @Akapaco2
      @Akapaco2 7 дней назад +2

      US manufacturing has actually been steadily increasing for the past decade. The US is currently the 2nd largest manufacturer on Earth, second only to China.
      It's just that automation has replaced many of the traditional factory jobs. So while the number of workers has decreased, the manufacturing capacity has increased.
      With all that being said, I still think that the Tarriffs are a terrible idea, that will just lead to more inflation. If our government wants us less dependent on other countries, there are better ways to do it.

    • @whitemaleoprah
      @whitemaleoprah 7 дней назад

      Which building back manufacturing is one of Trump’s biggest deals

    • @Cherry-pu4mx
      @Cherry-pu4mx 4 дня назад

      Lol manufacturing capacity is not the issue. The usa is better than china at manufacturing. No debate there. The issue is automaton

  • @andreweaston1779
    @andreweaston1779 9 дней назад +14

    $5 or $10 T-shirts made overseas are produced for around $45 in the US. It is the same type of story for so many of those types of products.
    Those jobs are NEVER coming back.

    • @Howdy1957
      @Howdy1957 9 дней назад +1

      Labor costs

    • @kenho-wr5ul2rh7m
      @kenho-wr5ul2rh7m 8 дней назад

      @@Howdy1957 Trade war has some long term and big consequence
      Trade war against European car in 1960s-1970s caused the rise of Japanese car globabaly in 1970s
      Job outsourcing in US started from 1980s, because of Ronald Reagan's trade war against Japanese car, and this consequence still last till these days, US still outsources jobs in 2020s
      Great Depression in 1929 started because of the trade war against Europe from ~1927-1929

    • @Cherry-pu4mx
      @Cherry-pu4mx 4 дня назад

      Why are you defending a $5 shirt?

    • @kenho-wr5ul2rh7m
      @kenho-wr5ul2rh7m 4 дня назад

      @@Cherry-pu4mx im buying the same quality at $5 instead of $45

    • @Cherry-pu4mx
      @Cherry-pu4mx 4 дня назад

      @@kenho-wr5ul2rh7m lol no. You are out of your mind if you think chinese crap is the same quality.

  • @daniyalamed2960
    @daniyalamed2960 5 дней назад +2

    My question is whether the US economy can survive Trump. That is a better question to ask

  • @77Arbiter77
    @77Arbiter77 10 дней назад +67

    The better question you should be asking is if the American economy can survive

    • @TheBrokensaintvxvx
      @TheBrokensaintvxvx 10 дней назад

      Point 1:
      The american economy is based on the dollar.
      Point2:
      The US dollar is the world reserve currency.
      Point 3:
      With all the leg work that's been getting done setting up other nations with the F-35 program in nations like Italy, Netherlands, Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Belgium, Israel, Japan, and soon, possibly Poland with billion dollar deals for the capacity to manufacture or just buy this plane its armaments, and its capacities.

    • @griegomas
      @griegomas 10 дней назад +10

      I mean, obviously yes. The sky is not falling.

    • @b1r2y3n
      @b1r2y3n 9 дней назад

      @@griegomasyet

    • @armandoventura9043
      @armandoventura9043 9 дней назад +4

      The economy can survive, although now it would be a good question whether be at the level of Brazil or Argentina

    • @griegomas
      @griegomas 9 дней назад +3

      @@armandoventura9043 hopefully not. If that does happen, the inevitable financial contagion will mean most of the rest of the world will be in even worse shape.

  • @derekdgarcia1
    @derekdgarcia1 7 дней назад

    I just watched the documentary about this last night. China is already getting around tariffs by shipping unassembled parts to Mexico and then having a company in Mexico assembly in there and stamp a new label on it.

  • @Kwippy
    @Kwippy 9 дней назад +16

    In recent years I have bought Chinese made refrigerator, air conditioners, TV, electric shower, not to mention numerous other lower value goods. Why? Because they are cheap and amazingly, they are good! The days of Chinese goods being laughably inferior are long gone.

    • @DarkArcticTV
      @DarkArcticTV 7 дней назад +1

      Bot

    • @Raiz3l123
      @Raiz3l123 6 дней назад +1

      ​@@DarkArcticTV not bot he is saying true partially but not all Chinese products are long lasting and reliable like he said

    • @cashflownpv
      @cashflownpv 6 дней назад +1

      @@Raiz3l123 You get what you pay for. You want awesome HQ Chinese goods you'll have to pay more-just simple common sense

    • @Raiz3l123
      @Raiz3l123 6 дней назад +2

      @@cashflownpv umm yes bro i agree but sometimes high paying Chinese products shocks 😂😂😅👍

    • @kimchiba4570
      @kimchiba4570 3 дня назад +1

      ​@@DarkArcticTVlol.... What a childish knee jerk reply to anything that goes against your own brainwashed biased views ... Still stuck at 7 year old , mentally ?

  • @pennyshi6474
    @pennyshi6474 4 дня назад

    This is a marathon, way longer than 4 years.

  • @GamerKnight-os1ot
    @GamerKnight-os1ot 9 дней назад +11

    "But if we don't use Chinese sweatshop labour, and instead use american workers paying a liveable wage, American consumers will pay more!"
    Good!

    • @RagafragaMuffin
      @RagafragaMuffin 9 дней назад +3

      I agree with you in prospect. Ironically the workers will end up seeing a slight wage bump while the managers and board members rake in all the bonuses and stock lol. In the end the American consumer is paying for the rich to get richer. Unemployment isn’t an issue anymore, the wages are. The slots are already filled, everyone is just underpaid. The wrong people will see our money because they control when and how the raises are distributed. Naturally they keep more for themselves.

    • @NotASpecies
      @NotASpecies 9 дней назад +6

      sir livable wages in America is a joke lol. Trump wont raise the minimum wage thus with prices raising due to tariffs, the American worker falls behind resulting in more wage income disparity.

    • @NotASpecies
      @NotASpecies 9 дней назад +1

      @@RagafragaMuffin This would only occur if inflation rises justifying to corporations a bump in wages. I mean unions can strike but considering Trump stated that companies should be allowed to fire Union workers who strike for long periods of times I doubt that any real effort would be made to raise wages for Americans.
      I mean my mom has only received a 2% increase in her wages even with the 9% inflation and she makes around 30,000 per year which is way under the median income [all though my dad makes way more than her so I'm not struggling] but still, if her and my dad had divorced she'd be making under the poverty line because she works in education.
      Corporations will not rise wages unless they see a reasoning to do it, and even then the reasoning will only see a 1-3% bump in wages.

    • @jwhite5008
      @jwhite5008 9 дней назад

      @@RagafragaMuffin True. The workers' wages will increase a little. Prices will increase a lot.

    • @SimonSays-g6o
      @SimonSays-g6o 9 дней назад

      The us doesn't have the infrastructure anymore to simply start making everything internally again.
      Factories and that experience has been moving to China for 40 years
      To move it all back is gonna take decades

  • @mwxfl-q9h
    @mwxfl-q9h 8 дней назад +1

    One data can overturn the entire article: China's exports to developing countries have exceeded those of developed countries.
    This means that the market in developed countries is no longer the most important, and it also means that developed countries’ willingness to buy is greater than China’s willingness to sell.
    SO, no matter how much tariff you add, it does not affect the overall situation

  • @FernandoPerez3h.
    @FernandoPerez3h. 10 дней назад +24

    This could encourage other communist or authoritarian-leaning countries, like Cambodia, Vietnam, or Laos, to boost production, potentially positioning them to become U.S. rivals again once they gain power.

    • @seadkolasinac7220
      @seadkolasinac7220 10 дней назад +1

      Become enemies with the US while being desperate to access its consumer market? How does that work?

    • @ChillingKong
      @ChillingKong 9 дней назад +4

      They are too small enough to against the U.S.

    • @CountArtha
      @CountArtha 9 дней назад

      LOL

    • @darcylauren1934
      @darcylauren1934 9 дней назад

      @@ChillingKong More likely they'd rather have a broken China that they can steal territory from and expand their communist or authoritarian-leaning countries...

    • @emie9858
      @emie9858 9 дней назад +3

      >communist countries
      >Cambodia, Vietnam, and Laos
      You really have no idea what that means do you

  • @iscoperezavalos
    @iscoperezavalos 9 дней назад +2

    This channel usually has good information, but you can see the biases. Unfortunately, my expert opinion, China's economy will soon take over the US economy. The tariffs will do little.

  • @MaximilianoAedo
    @MaximilianoAedo 9 дней назад +4

    Donald Trump isn't really the brightest guy on Earth.

  • @tonywyli
    @tonywyli 11 часов назад

    Is CPC! You can't even get the name right!

  • @Finnestdude221
    @Finnestdude221 10 дней назад +12

    Probably yeah

  • @todortodorov6056
    @todortodorov6056 9 дней назад +1

    Tarifs only work if there is a viable (domestic) alternative. Where are they going to buy iPhones, MACs, PCs, electronics from? Those are not produced outside of China in quantities / supply enough to satisfy the demand. And same is true for many other products - with some exceptions, for example simpler stuff like clothing etc.

  • @youcantata
    @youcantata 10 дней назад +10

    Exports as % of GDP in China was about 20 % in 2023. And export to the USA is 17% of total export of China. So even if US totally bans all imports from China, it amounts only 4% of GDP of China at most. China will suffer, yes. But not so catastrophic to Chinese economy. 4% of GDP worths only 1 year of Chinese GDP growth. So China will overcome the economic shock from US import ban or tariff within 1-2 years.

    • @maritaschweizer1117
      @maritaschweizer1117 10 дней назад

      Yes. The question is how strong the USA will suffer. GOLDMAN-Sachs calculated a decline of GDP by 8.9% if Trump realize his plan. This is a twice as bad recesin in the USA than in 2008.

    • @NoUsername-470
      @NoUsername-470 9 дней назад

      According to the numbers of the Chinese government? Not too sure that’s the most reliable, after all there was somewhat, 100 million nonexistent people they counted?

    • @ShadowPhoenixMaximus
      @ShadowPhoenixMaximus 9 дней назад

      To who exactly? Where else can the CCP dump their tofu dreg products where they aren't already dumping them?
      Chinese people aren't buying enough Chinese products to make the country self-sufficient, so they're relying on foreign exports to prop up their economy. If even Chinese people don't want what the CCP is selling, why should anyone else?

    • @johnsullivan8673
      @johnsullivan8673 9 дней назад +1

      @@ShadowPhoenixMaximus you got tofu brain

    • @cool_things_collection
      @cool_things_collection 4 дня назад

      @@ShadowPhoenixMaximus Wake up from your dream and see the world, bro

  • @alexdnstuart
    @alexdnstuart 9 дней назад

    Your editor made a mistake at 3:02

  • @chengkuoklee5734
    @chengkuoklee5734 10 дней назад +16

    Dude, Cuba still alive. Question is how painful will Americans get?

    • @dalekrenegade2596
      @dalekrenegade2596 10 дней назад +3

      They complain about grocery prices now wait until the prices if EVERYTHING just skyrocket.

    • @NoUsername-470
      @NoUsername-470 9 дней назад +2

      @@dalekrenegade2596Dude the US is a food exporter.

    • @seanthe100
      @seanthe100 9 дней назад +2

      ​@@dalekrenegade2596most essentials are made in the US. 😂😂😂 US largest food exporter, the US the largest oil and gas producer by far.

    • @dalekrenegade2596
      @dalekrenegade2596 9 дней назад +1

      @@seanthe100
      Using parts from other countries. Where do you think microchips or Trump merchandise comes from?

    • @dalekrenegade2596
      @dalekrenegade2596 9 дней назад

      @@NoUsername-470
      Then why billions of dollars worth tax dollars needed to bail out farmers during Trump's last tariff war?

  • @PipinoExcalibur
    @PipinoExcalibur 9 дней назад +2

    its not ccp but cpc

  • @konman181
    @konman181 9 дней назад +11

    Dude. OUR economy can't survive trump 😂

  • @javaman7199
    @javaman7199 9 дней назад +1

    I am more concerned about the damage he is going to do to the American economy.

  • @jeffmorris5802
    @jeffmorris5802 9 дней назад +12

    This was remarkably neutral. Well done TL;DR. It would have been very easy to veer into partisan opinions on this topic.

  • @andrelanyak2131
    @andrelanyak2131 6 дней назад +1

    3:37 "Tariffs doesn't work"
    Graph showing its drop😀, so which one is it?

    • @reaperz5677
      @reaperz5677 3 дня назад

      Do... you understand how graphs work? And when U.S. presidents take office?
      Trump took office in 2017, he was only elected in 2016. China's surplus was dropping during Obama-era, as evident by 2015/2016, and started rising... in Trump-era America, during 2019/2020.
      So yeah, tariffs don't work, the graph clearly shows there's no correlation to U.S. tariffs on China with their surplus. Pay attention is school next time.

  • @OperationAndrewDocumentaries
    @OperationAndrewDocumentaries 10 дней назад +5

    China tariffs kind of make some sense. Starting a trade war with the rest of the world...
    Less logical.
    Expect inflation and less choice of products.
    Also expect American business that import raw materials to suffer.

    • @OperationAndrewDocumentaries
      @OperationAndrewDocumentaries 10 дней назад +1

      American businesses that depend on exporting are also likely to face tarrifs coming back their way.
      Which is like ramping up taxes on your own businesses but not getting any money for it

    • @MrFastFarmer
      @MrFastFarmer 10 дней назад

      I’m shocked how many people don’t understand the strategy. It’s not about trade wars, it about withdrawing from globalisation

    • @dalekrenegade2596
      @dalekrenegade2596 10 дней назад

      @MrFastFarmer
      There is no strategy, just an idiot going off vibes.

  • @code_play_channel
    @code_play_channel 9 дней назад +1

    Nothing like economic advise from... the UK :/ lol

  • @richardlabeja
    @richardlabeja 10 дней назад +13

    China's advantage is they have a long term strategy spanning decades, whereas western countries have very short term strategies. China is still the Top Trading Partner to more than 120 countries.

    • @sonneh86
      @sonneh86 10 дней назад

      That's such a dumb myth. If the Chinese really plan while thinking far into the future they would have never had that catastrophic one China policy

    • @dean_l33
      @dean_l33 10 дней назад +4

      It's dumb to assume they have decades long plot. They're human not some alien but also that doesn't mean they don't have some kind of plot going

    • @attackxxx
      @attackxxx 10 дней назад

      Yea 3 year lockdown was an excellent long term strategy.

    • @alburaq3290
      @alburaq3290 9 дней назад +1

      CCP ruined any long term potential of China with their one child policy.
      Their demographics are in the gutter. Turns out Chinese also plan short term.

    • @thedevguy4272
      @thedevguy4272 9 дней назад

      @@dean_l33You don’t need to be alien to have plans for decades. The communists can plan like that because they have authoritarian rule. But the downside is that they’re slow to respond to change, and these systems fail eventually.

  • @Ed44503
    @Ed44503 8 дней назад +2

    Tariffs will destroy the American economy

  • @acenda-r2d2
    @acenda-r2d2 9 дней назад +2

    Wrong question. The correct question is: "Can USA's Economy Survive Trump 2.0?"

  • @ethandouro4334
    @ethandouro4334 9 дней назад

    I want to check out brilliant, but I'm poor af, I'll sign for it if it helps TLDR in the future. Thanks! ❤❤❤

    • @oneshothunter9877
      @oneshothunter9877 9 дней назад +1

      TLDR will be fine.
      It is the number of subscribers/patreons, the likes, the actual watch time and such + the company advertising that pays his bills.
      Keep your money. Spent it for a better life for yourself if "poor af" as you said it yourself.
      Be best.

    • @ethandouro4334
      @ethandouro4334 9 дней назад +1

      @oneshothunter9877 I was interested in the courses though, I live in a slum in Brazil and I want to work home office to a firm overseas, but I have no academic or courses left. I guess I'll look further into my own education...
      Thanks

    • @thehuman2cs715
      @thehuman2cs715 9 дней назад

      @@ethandouro4334 Maybe look into getting a google or coursera certificate if you want something that can prove to companies that you do have certain tangible skills.

  • @gweejiahan9336
    @gweejiahan9336 10 дней назад +21

    CHINA exports to USA makes up only 2.4% of their GDP. So Im pretty sure they will be fine.

    • @gingee-f3v
      @gingee-f3v 10 дней назад +1

      Not fine😢no job no income no dignity here

    • @thedevguy4272
      @thedevguy4272 9 дней назад

      It depends on if you believe their GDP figures, which I do not. But the truth is that you’re right it won’t substantially harm China until we get other countries to stop trading with them too.

    • @lordpeanut3245
      @lordpeanut3245 9 дней назад

      I agree with that, but honestly there is no way in hell trump would be ever able "convince" enough of the global economy to stop trading with China.

    • @zeflute4586
      @zeflute4586 4 дня назад

      @@thedevguy4272 omg... stop all these "i dont believe their GDP figures" ignorance already🙄.

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 3 дня назад

      @@thedevguy4272 now why would other countries do that? China is the number 1 trading partner for most countries in the world.

  • @caughtinprovidence7197
    @caughtinprovidence7197 9 дней назад +2

    the title should be " Can America really dare to take on China "

  • @kingabzthebabz8493
    @kingabzthebabz8493 8 дней назад

    “Why else would you watch a 10min video on trump’s position on china” because I’m eating bro

  • @louisjefferies2733
    @louisjefferies2733 10 дней назад +35

    But can America's economy survive Trump 2.0

    • @landenjones9374
      @landenjones9374 10 дней назад

      Bro the whole point of the tariffs are trumps attempt to bring manufacturing back to America (aka create more job's and make the US more self reliant) and cut income taxes that's really not a bad idea and many president's have been trying to do this for year's,
      just none have been this extreme about it.
      Not to mention trump also wants tap into our own oil supply so we don't have to buy it from others and rely on imports (and he also even wants to export some of our own oil to an extent)
      Trumps also talked multiple times about investing into renewable nuclear energy systems (this will reduce the price of electricity btw.)
      And trump also wants to deport illegal immigrants who steal jobs and leach off of welfare/taxpayer dollars.
      And he wants to cut military funding to Ukraine (which we've given hundreds of billions of dollars under the biden Harris administration btw.)
      Among a few other thing's.
      Even if he doesn't have the greatest economic plan it's 10× better than Kamala Harris's economic plan LMAO.

    • @ThwipThwipBoom
      @ThwipThwipBoom 10 дней назад +11

      We already did once for 4 years and things went fine. People are being over dramatic about Trump.

    • @krashme997
      @krashme997 10 дней назад +5

      @@ThwipThwipBoom His policies weren't half as extreme as back in 2016

    • @landenjones9374
      @landenjones9374 10 дней назад

      @@louisjefferies2733 Bro the whole point of the tariffs are trumps attempt to bring manufacturing back to America (aka create more job's and make the US more self reliant) and cut income taxes that's really not a bad idea and many president's have been trying to do this for year's,
      just none have been this extreme about it.
      Not to mention trump also wants tap into our own oil supply so we don't have to buy it from others and rely on imports (and he also even wants to export some of our own oil to an extent)
      Trumps also talked multiple times about investing into renewable nuclear energy systems (this will reduce the price of electricity btw.)
      And trump also wants to deport illegal immigrants who steal jobs and leach off of welfare/taxpayer dollars.
      And he wants to cut military funding to Ukraine (which we've given hundreds of billions of dollars under the biden Harris administration btw.)
      Among a few other thing's.
      Even if he doesn't have the greatest economic plan it's 10× better than Kamala Harris's economic plan LMAO.

    • @ThwipThwipBoom
      @ThwipThwipBoom 10 дней назад +1

      @@krashme997 That's a straight lie. You liberals lost the election because you can't stop lying.

  • @mustang8206
    @mustang8206 9 дней назад +1

    I think the White House should publish a list online on of what the top imports are in different industries to encourage Americans to not buy from these brands. It probably won't do much but it'll have a some impact on the deficit

  • @OldManBryan
    @OldManBryan 10 дней назад +5

    If I was an english teacher I’d give you an F at this point for how often you overuse the word “crisis.”

  • @allis4786
    @allis4786 5 дней назад

    The question is can the US dollar survive without the global trade?

  • @MarktYertd
    @MarktYertd 10 дней назад +17

    Perhaps China becomes a bit more isolated, but since they make everything except chips and have local companies, they may be able to survive in the future.

    • @shafsteryellow
      @shafsteryellow 10 дней назад +11

      Isolated 😂

    • @jeremybiggs8413
      @jeremybiggs8413 10 дней назад +3

      They don’t have a consumer economy and all attempts to make one have failed. They need American consumers to keep their economy afloat.

    • @Nightwing6427
      @Nightwing6427 10 дней назад +4

      @@shafsteryellow what happens when someone gets isolated in western propaganda bubble

    • @pierren___
      @pierren___ 10 дней назад +1

      ​@@jeremybiggs8413 they have their own citizens lmao. They would do as well without usa

    • @kv4648
      @kv4648 10 дней назад +2

      The reason they're trying to export is to soften the recession they're going through

  • @wiktorjachyra1869
    @wiktorjachyra1869 9 дней назад +12

    Ah yes, instead of American companies being competitive let’s tariff the competition and force people to buy the more expensive American products

    • @nhjhbmkuy7173
      @nhjhbmkuy7173 9 дней назад +4

      Which will likely remain less competitive as imports of raw materials become more expensive

    • @CountArtha
      @CountArtha 9 дней назад +1

      American companies will be more competitive as he relaxes regulations, reduces corporate tax, and the U.S. produces more energy.

    • @nhjhbmkuy7173
      @nhjhbmkuy7173 9 дней назад

      @@CountArtha small hole in your theory with all the certain retaliatory tariffs certain to be placed on the US we won’t be producing anywhere near the amount of energy we are now since who would buy it? And corporate taxes are already next to nothing and what further regulations? At this point rivers may start catching fire again

    • @VICTOR-vf8yx
      @VICTOR-vf8yx 9 дней назад +5

      ​@CountArtha
      Problem is that large American companies are inherently never competitive and do not try to be. Rather they are primarily oriented around profit maximization far above any reasonable amount
      e.g. insulin, recent American cars, etc.
      This prevents innovation as it does not create an inherent necessity.

    • @wiktorjachyra1869
      @wiktorjachyra1869 9 дней назад

      @ yeah I just watched a mini doc last night about how American cars are so unaffordable because they shifted their priority to profit and higher margins over higher volume

  • @onlypatel8297
    @onlypatel8297 8 дней назад +2

    Donald duck in just trying to save sinking west and fail miserably

    • @JM-gj7de
      @JM-gj7de 7 дней назад

      Awww look...someone is jealous.

  • @andrewstevens9481
    @andrewstevens9481 9 дней назад +6

    For all the complaints about Trump his China tariffs and general unease about the trade imbalance was one big bright spot.

  • @tanaka5395
    @tanaka5395 9 дней назад +1

    The tariffs are not there to stop consumers buying chinese products, they are their to force companies to move manufacturing operations out of China.

    • @freetorobandloot
      @freetorobandloot 7 дней назад

      He tried that in the first term. That didn't work because the supply chain is still heavily depended on China. I doubt it will work this time around either.

    • @cool_things_collection
      @cool_things_collection 4 дня назад

      China is more focused on expanding its market to a broader range of countries. There are 8 billion people worldwide, a market far larger than the US. The US market represents only a very small portion of its global trade.

    • @reaperz5677
      @reaperz5677 3 дня назад

      @@cool_things_collection Yet the U.S. market (besides the E.U. market) is the biggest, high-income, developed consumer market there is.
      You can say that it "represents only a very small portion of global trade" all you want, the truth is that Americans are still the largest market, because they can actually afford everything the Chinese/any other country is offering them. Every other country is either not as big as the U.S., or too underdeveloped to afford anything China would try selling. There isn't "much" to expand to for China. Expanding into rural Ethiopia where people can barely afford electricity isn't a replacement for American consumers lol.
      So yeah you're incorrect, basically.

  • @jordisaura6748
    @jordisaura6748 10 дней назад +8

    When everyone is part of BRICS, what do USA's tariffs mather?

    • @RCXDerp
      @RCXDerp 10 дней назад

      Nobody wants to partner with Russia and India is disputing their border with China. Brics won't happen.

    • @WinterXR7
      @WinterXR7 10 дней назад +2

      Their chinas biggest trading partner.

    • @ricardomadleno564
      @ricardomadleno564 10 дней назад

      I do t think you understand what tariffs means. Also the biggest economies in the world are already in the G7 and the G20 which btw includes China as well…

    • @jaegar2004
      @jaegar2004 10 дней назад +5

      The brics is not a real alliance lol😂! There are more conflicts than trade agreements inside! Just few examples: 1. egypt vs ethiopia. 2.saudi arabia and uae vs iran 3. India vs china. India and brazil even rejected belt and road initiative! What a bunch of looosers😂😂😂!!

    • @Abhinav-m4o
      @Abhinav-m4o 10 дней назад

      ​@@jaegar2004but they're sovereign unlike US vassals
      Surely india and China has tension
      But that doesn't prevent them from brics summit and border disengagement

  • @eddieohearn17
    @eddieohearn17 9 дней назад +1

    No but he will cripple our economy

  • @victorln
    @victorln 10 дней назад +6

    Just a small nitpick; 2:23 the currency symbol should really be a $..

    • @eggpankakes
      @eggpankakes 10 дней назад

      The deficit is visualised accurately, it is the difference between exports and imports and this was visualised by adding the deficit amount onto the export amount to show it amounting to the value of imports. This is why the yellow bar reaches the 500 line but that is only because it is stacked on the imports.

    • @mayank.9203
      @mayank.9203 10 дней назад +3

      2:49 it hit 500 because they were talking about deficit , it started from the 100 something mark . So blue bar+ the yellow bar = the red bar . I.e export+ deficit= import .

    • @ru2225
      @ru2225 10 дней назад

      Just a small nitpick; you misread the graph at 2:49

  • @Bytional
    @Bytional 9 дней назад +1

    In reality, even you put 200% tariff on Chinese goods, the 1st thing you need to make sure is US can replace that goods with something cheaper than 200% tariffs Chinese one, the problem with US right now is they can't make something cheap enough for the American people.

  • @DJYStarTV
    @DJYStarTV 10 дней назад +9

    The Chinese market is the only one that is really growing, I think China will be happy having its domestic market for itself.

    • @GC__99__99
      @GC__99__99 9 дней назад +1

      It's had its own isolated market since covid and it hasn't been doing well (like the rest of the world). The undervalued currency makes their goods cheap for other countries, but not for the salaries of their own workers to afford the very things they're making. Also it's not true that it's the only market that's growing, just Google "countries with gdp growth 2024"

    • @crosslink1493
      @crosslink1493 8 дней назад

      If you believe the data the CCP publishes. Look at foreign analyst's outlooks on China for the last few years and they are either flat or negative on Chinese markets. Most I see rate China as too risky for investment right now.

  • @rubylaser8601
    @rubylaser8601 4 дня назад +1

    Decouple. Different ideology camps can only decouple. Like the cold war.

  • @cuthomas4664
    @cuthomas4664 10 дней назад +3

    One side of the discussion I rarely seen people talk about: Given tge current condition, would the world economy grow without Chinese or semi Chinese goods? The manufacturing of consumer goods or any mass production goods are optimal. We haven't seen Apple moving any iphone production line to the US for quite a long time since the iphone inception!

    • @azliaheaven
      @azliaheaven 9 дней назад

      it would staganate since it will require moving manufacturing to other places

    • @DanielBlak
      @DanielBlak 9 дней назад

      It grew before China was a major exporter. Maybe you don't remember but most products used to say Made In Japan 30 years ago.

    • @cuthomas4664
      @cuthomas4664 9 дней назад

      @ Yes, before China it was Japan. But the era of Japan manufacturing was before the globalization and the Japan only produced maybe 1/10 at max of consumers goods we used today. Made in Japan products back then only served industrialized countries. China now manufacturing for the world. Chinese domestic market is so huge 1.4 billion people, so the production cost is really optimized to the point of unproductive if manufacturing elsewhere for most of the things. You can say textiles made in Cambodia or Bangladesh, but the clothes and the sewing machines are coming from China!

  • @whiskytangofoxtrot204
    @whiskytangofoxtrot204 8 дней назад +1

    As with BRICS, China will also isolate America in trade, Trump asked for it with his America First plan.
    But at least Trump promised America cheap eggs.

  • @marks7566
    @marks7566 10 дней назад +6

    Interesting thumbnail. Pretty sure the Chinese don't use Yen.

    • @nzrock1
      @nzrock1 10 дней назад +7

      Both the JP Yen and CN Yuan uses the same symbols...

    • @AoShinden
      @AoShinden 10 дней назад

      thats the yuan

    • @nloadergd9193
      @nloadergd9193 10 дней назад +3

      they use the same Y sign

    • @ru2225
      @ru2225 10 дней назад

      Interesting comment. It shows your ignorance.

    • @marks7566
      @marks7566 10 дней назад

      @@ru2225 Actually, it should be 元, but yes, I'm ignorant.

  • @newjerseylion4804
    @newjerseylion4804 7 дней назад

    Why do I feel that it's going shift the tax basis from the rich to the middle class.

    • @victorconway444
      @victorconway444 7 дней назад +1

      And that's on top of Republicans' planned "simplification" of the tax code that will more directly make the rich pay less and everyone else pay more.