Life is Worth Living | Episode 38 | How to Compare World Religions | Fulton Sheen

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 36

  • @305areacode4
    @305areacode4 7 месяцев назад +7

    Venerable Fulton Sheen was a gift to the world.

  • @kevino9161
    @kevino9161 2 месяца назад +2

    One Faith, One Hope, One Baptism. Jesus Christ is God(Father, Son, Holy Spirit).

  • @Watcher1301
    @Watcher1301 2 месяца назад +2

    I Am The Truth
    Truth was identified with His Person because He was God.
    You cannot fall in love with the theorem of geometry.
    Virtue begins to be loveable only when it is incarnated in a person.

  • @DogSniffing
    @DogSniffing Год назад +10

    8 minutes in for the Napoleon take down. Napoleon never existed.

    • @Lerian_V
      @Lerian_V Год назад +2

      Yeah, he's not a historical figure.

  • @Chinutti
    @Chinutti 4 дня назад

    He said, “I Am The Truth.”
    The Truth was identified with his person because he was God. You cannot fall in love with the theorem of geometry. Virtue begins to be lovable only when it is incarnated in a person.

    • @Chinutti
      @Chinutti 4 дня назад

      And that was why he was the savior of all men and he said if I be drawn up I will draw all men to myself and so when he came to die he stripped himself of every individuating note in order that he might belong to all men. So all other religions are sunshine religions. They’re all right for happy prosperous days. But he brought the only religion in the world that began with defeat. With an ignominious failure and therefore adversity, and he came out of it by resurrection because he was God. And that is why he’s the only one that can ever give hope in trial. For as someone has put it, “We have a God who STUMBLED TO HIS THRONE!”

  • @Chinutti
    @Chinutti 10 дней назад +1

    @21:50

  • @gabetheformerforddriver5034
    @gabetheformerforddriver5034 11 месяцев назад +9

    Simplifying an argument for the sake of saving time during a television program does not constitute a strawman, as the two other idiots in this comment section claim.

    • @305areacode4
      @305areacode4 7 месяцев назад +1

      Exactly. Not to mention these were all off the top of his head. He prepared well for them, but did not follow a script or use cards.

  • @Chinutti
    @Chinutti 4 дня назад

    @22:11

  • @peterblock6964
    @peterblock6964 Год назад +2

    Well, that was a master class in how to set up a strawman and then demolish it.
    But he did do it with much charisma, costumed flair, and panache.

    • @brockaho6155
      @brockaho6155 Год назад +1

      Lol I read your comment right as I came to the end. My thoughts exactly

    • @videonmode8649
      @videonmode8649 Год назад +3

      What do you mean?

    • @peterblock6964
      @peterblock6964 Год назад +1

      @@videonmode8649,
      Here's the definition per Wikipedia:
      "A straw man fallacy is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction. One who engages in this fallacy is said to be 'attacking a straw man'."

    • @videonmode8649
      @videonmode8649 Год назад +8

      @@peterblock6964
      So what's your argument against Fulton Sheen?

    • @peterblock6964
      @peterblock6964 Год назад

      That he is worthless as an apologist,@@videonmode8649.