Facts. That and the negative talk about the deck and lack of respect for anything not top tier. It's awesome but he put it straight in the trash basically. Why even make the video at all then??
Fallen paradise: "it's too much work for the setup, and even then draws are bad :(" Awakening: "even though it requires double the setup for negation you gotta play it at 3" Makes sense to me
@@faisfaizal5194 I know as long as you have either spirit gates or dark beckoning beast plus choas summoning beast or dark summoning beast you can end with 2 sacred beasts on the field with fallen paradise active and have the chance to have skyfire and or awakening active on the field as well You need almerga, spelling?, in the extra deck to pull it off but it is like 50 to 60 cents well withing most people's budgets
What's dumb, is he uses 3 of the traps and says having 2 sacred beasts on the field is a bit kf a set up but not too bad and it's worth doing. Yet drawing two cards for free just for having one on the field isn't enough??
@@Cynic_Scripts then you remember that she is the better target for summoning apkalone with another shaddoll or any shaddoll fusion monster with her as the shaddoll monster, not the attribute one.
@@Cynic_Scripts yah as that stuiped sence windi is starte for the fucking deck wtf jest because of wind that it doesn't matter as it helps get out more founder for fusion summoning
Personally, I subbed out two Fallen for a Phantasmal Martyrs and Hyper Blaze. Like, if I'm already expected to have 2 Sacred Beats out, why not ahave a card that could allow me to summon the third? 🤷♀️
@@TAK1997 Because then you would have to draw into Ravial since you would have to lose your hand and he's the only one that can be summoned from the tokens.
@@animegx45 idk why I thought I could keep raviel in my hand and discard the rest to summon the tokens.. duh if course not! I'm throwing that card away as soon as I get home from work! Actually no, I'm gonna call home and have my wife do it so I never even have to see it ever again
no offense but I see that you didn't play them that much to know what's best for this deck. Fallen paradise at 1 hhhhh I mean you literally have a sacred beast deck you gonna summon the fucking 4000 points beasts anyway, so fallen paradise is so important, it gives some immunity to them which is what you really need and it gives you drawing power even more awesome than desires. So in a deck centred on sacred beasts summoning, fallen paradise is a MUST ! Not to mention that hamon spell card, I mean this was another ridiculous part of this video literally ! and man desires shouldn't be played for this deck at alll, all cards are important in this deck that needs deck cards to be able to work, desires is ruining this deck and I don't know why konami put it in there, I mean I would have loved some ash blossom or a hand trap! anyway that's just an opinion of someone who loves and plays sacred beast a lot !
Pot of desires is expensive-ish so it was just there to have a common reprint for the competitive players. Also ash blossom got printed in soul burner.
I agree completely, except for the fact that "Pot of Desires" doesnt work. It should indeed not be at 3, because you would risk getting 2 pots in 1 game, but it is very handy to play 2. You dont want to interfere with the combo, but after comboing off with the summoning / beckoning beasts and using "Fallen Paradise", it is very useful because you really want to see "Cerulean Skyfire" and "Awakening of the Sacred Beasts" in the first turn rather than the second.
@@mrjazper yeah but you can summon sacred beasts and get to draw thanks to paradise andwith desires you risk to sent let's say all the copies of a sacred beast and then be unable to use armityle.
@@zorcnecro6910 that is very true, but since I dont use armityle as a key card, but more as a Rogue option to win, I dont really prefer having 3 different beasts in the game above 2, as long as those two are Hamon and Raviel, at least. And extra cards are always nice
I'm gonna be honest I don't like the way you build decks that aren't "meta". You're clearly only focused on the meta which is fine. But Yu-Gi-Oh! is that much more fun when you're playing with decks that don't see that much play. The meta decks are of course more powerful, but always playing with and against the same decks isn't really that fun after some time. Based on playing competitively you do give good information.
also changes Hamon to defense mode after the use but Hamon has the effect that makes it so that only it can be the target for the attack protecting the 0/0 monsters or any low attack monsters like the predaplant verte anaconda, if you have one on the field, as 4000 defense is quite hard to get over as most of the time if people use it they just leave it on the field
@@AxisChurchDevotee yeah as the new ruling on how negates works only applies to the attempt to activate something not the attempt to use that effect, I believe
@@nightsider2705 Why get rid of 1 negate when you can get rid of 3? No normal summon is a fair tradeoff with how much people invest on their turn 1 board and sphere mode wrecks their strategy for the game.
I side in 1 sphere mode and 1 vaskii. You are guaranteed to have atleast 1-2 of the main deck 0/0 Beasts on the board at all times. Pretty niche, but removing 3 threats and 1 card each turn can come in clutch
I actually tested out the ocg copy of this deck on duellingbook and had a pretty good list that didn't run Uria. If I opened either Opening of the Gates or Dark Beckoning Beast, I would usually end on Hamon and Raviel. Combo: Activate either Gates or Dark Beckoning Beast in hand to search the other, Then use that card to search Chaos Summoning Beast or Dark Summoning Beast (you'll also need a copy of the other in your hand). Tribute Dark Beckoning Beast for Dark Summoning Beast. Then tribute that for either Hamon or Raviel. Discard chaos summoning beast with the effect of opening of the gates and revive it (this is a legal play) Banish dark summoning beast for the other Sacred Beast that you didnt summon. Tribute Chaos Summoning Beast and Special Summon the other SB. Banish Chaos Summining Beast to add Fallen Paradise and activate it to draw 2 cards. From there any extra cards you have like Awakening, or the Hamon Spell are really helpful. If you can survive with the board you can usually win. Just like any other combo hand traps stop it dead in its tracks.
If Konami does another structure deck poll next year I would want Guardians to be one of the choices and win since that archetype deserves some good cards with one that can bypass their summon restriction, having butterfly dagger unbanned, and errata the celestial sword so you can use both it’s effect and Eato’s effect in the same turn.
6:33 "It's kinda unfortunate that it's in Sacred Beasts" On the contrary- Legacy support that is exclusive to the Archetypes they were made for is something we need more of, lest we see more Archetypes get the short end of the stick like Dark Magician and Crystron got.
@@DaRealistInIt I'm mainly doing it because Vendread from its inception was never really good, it had tons of promise with Code of the Duelist but konami shafted the deck in its support in Circuit break and Flames of Destruction, and when avendread savior got revealed it turned out that it wasn't really doing much by himself, that and vendread was the first archetype i put together ever since i saw a Revendread Slayer in my first pack of Code of the Duelist.
The deck building in this version is just plain bad, even worse is the lack of respect for the deck. This profile is almost as bad as the shaddoll one.
@@cmen9537 Yes I do, this is my 3 structure only version. MONSTERS: 20 Raviel, Lord of Phantasms - Heaven-Crushing Fist x1 Raviel, Lord of Phantasms x2 Hamon, Lord of Striking Thunder x2 Uria, Lord of Searing Flames x1 Dark Summoning Beast x3 Dark Beckoning Beast x3 Chaos Summoning Beast x3 Chaos Hunter x2 Radian, the Multidimensional Kaiju x3 SPELLS | 13 Pot of Desires x3 Dimension Fusion Destruction x2 Fallen Paradise x2 The Seven Spirit Gates Unleashed x3 Cerulean Sky Fire x2 One for One x1 TRAPS | 7 Hyper Blaze x1 Dark Factory of More Production x3 Sacred Beast Awakening x3 EXTRA DECK | 6 Armityle the Chaos Phantom x3 Phantasm Emperor Trilojig x3
@@cmen9537 yes you can, in fact I recomend you do. Simple budget cards like foolish burial, monster reborn, reasoning, effect veiler and call by the grave do a lot for this deck.
It's referencing his hidden effect. A lot of people don't realise that the new Raviel has an additional effect that isn't written on the card. Just like the winged dragon of Ra. While you control the new Raviel "If an "Elemental HERO" monster attacks a monster that has a higher ATK, the attacking monster gains 1000 ATK during damage calculation only."
Imagine building this “competitively” and running Uria. Imagine building this “competitively” and only running one Fallen Paradise (psst, the Sacred Beasts are kinda vulnerable to card effects. They kinda need the protection. Double psst if you aren’t getting the “set up” for Paradise (Summoning a Sacred Beast on your first turn) then you’re losing) Sorry Cimo but on a casual and competitive basis this build is wrong.
Day 3 of waiting for GOOD Felgrand/Divine Dragon Lord Support to arrive. Did you know that Felgrand Dragon appeared in statue form in the artwork of "Trade-In" ?Ironically if you use Trade-In to send Felgrand Dragon to the graveyard that way you cannot revive it without ignoring its summoning conditions.
@@duelknight But whats budget about this, its literally 3 Structure decks slapped together without a single addition/replacement. Anyone can make a decent deck out of 3 Prebought Decks due to the limited amount of cards but adding or replacing small cards to enhance the power, thats sth worth getting inspiration from others as you wont have every card in mind that could make the deck better
As someone who playtested Sacred Beasts a bit online... IK running a lone copy of a field spell is a bit of thing recently (look at Salamangreats, Orcust, & Dragon Link), but 1 copy of Fallen Paradise is sooooooo wrong! It protects your Sacred Beasts & lets you go +2, like how is that a 1 of? It's a 2-3 of w/o a doubt, man this is the Reeshaddoll Wendi scenario all over again! (& don't get me started on 3 Awakening, Desires, & no Cerulean Skyfire)
pod is a really situational card that you deck i needs to be kind of build around it. if your deck requieres the use of all the cards available for the deck, dont play pod as it is going to prevent you from playing yugioh. but if your deck can maintain itself with the loss of 10 cards then play it as the +2 you are getting from it is going to give you an eage. do if you are playing a sacred beast deck do not play pod as it is going to destroy your deck, let alone 3 of them. fallen paradise is so much better for the deck as the focus of the deck is to summon the sacred beast, and fallen gives them protection from targeting and effects plus a pot of greed every turn if you control a sacred beast, and it is searchable with chaos summoning beast. his deck profile is so bad that anyone with even the most casual experience with yugioh can see that he does not give a crap about making a good build.
i better sacred beasts x3 or dinomasher's fury x3? i play for fun and i want to perform some fun combo, but at the same time i want to do some otk things
It's a bummer that you didn't put your heart and soul into this deck like other videos I've seen. Other duelists who believe the deck has potential; they know it has potential. I'm gonna build it but not this build you are showing us.
I love this deck so far. Never realized how easy it is to summon Armityle and OTK opponent with it on like turn 1 or two. Using it as this decks win condition for sure.
Cimoooo i really love you and i'm not saying this out of hatred, but you really did an awful job at looking the real potential here. sacred beast deck is not gonna be meta, thats a fact, but you lacked in depth analysis just because of that. your suggestions about: Fallen paradise, pot of desires,swords, the 2 of any beast like they can do the same things and it doesn't matter anyway , are why i'm saying that. Please,if you're not interested in any way in a deck, don't post just for the sake of posting a video, or at least put in some more research.
Is it just me that sees the connection between the new Raviel and the summoning beasts and the Lair of Darkness deck, legit throw in the Kaijus you get as well and play Lair as well as Opening of the Spirit Gates and the standard Raviel Lord of Phantasms as well, that's a legitimately good dark fiend tribute based deck, I think it can work with possibly a Monarch or Shaddoll engine too
I have a question. If you special summon one of the gods of this deck with chaos summoning beast and then activate the effect of hyper blaze can you special summon from grave a god ignoring its summoning conditions?
Sam: "Fallen Paradise" is so good. We'll put it at 2. It's literally a pot of greed. Cimo: "Fallen Paradise" is so bad. We'll put it at 1. If it gets banished thats ok. (Same guy that tells us anything that gives us a +1 is good) nice video by the way.
Hey Cimmoo I wanted to ask you a quick question and I hope you can read this and answer but do you think that Yu-Gi-Oh is dead or gone? Ive been playing for a long time and I am a returning player and I took the time to watch the anime and learn all the summoning mechanics and I really did enjoy it and the anime really made it fun and enjoyable for me at least, but I see people bringing out these points that master rule 4 killed the game along with the banlist and I want to hear from you if you see and read this, is Yu-Gi-Oh dying?
I have another question. Can someone explain me the second effect of the awakening of the sacred beasts? What does it mean the activated effects of your apponent's monsters
Basically, it negates the effects of monsters that activate. What it cannot negate is continuous effects, such as the Skill Drain effect of Destiny HERO - Plasma
Is there much in this deck that's splashable into other decks, or is it pretty much only usable alongside Sacred Beasts? Cuz if the cards can be played in other decks I'd be more keen to pick these up.
Dark bekonning/ spirit gates + one discard is a curius setup. Activate gates. Add bekonning Normal bekonning. Add chaos summoning. Normal chaos summoning. Make linkuribuh. Revive chaos summoning mit gate. Make relinquished anima. Now you can make curius.
Archfiends, dangers, darkworld, and believe it or not abyss actors can mesh with dark summoning beast to get raviel on board. I'm sure there are others but I've only tried the ones above before with raviel.
No. It can't. If you play against any meta deck and don't open called by the grave, none of your combos are resolving and you get to summon MAYBE one Sacred Beast and then just pass.
Noob question (so long with out playing ) will you be doing a playlist with all the foundation generic ruling just like the level 1 basic judge rules people need to know ; ?? never was any good ( just a collector )
My strat with my sacred beast deck is just to try to mill the 3 sacred beasts and then just use the probably searched fusion spell to summon armityle and otk my opponent
Question: if there is zombie world in the field and there can be only one in the field and i have ash in field can i normal summon Serziel ( Fiend Type ) ?
I play with Hamon, the yellow scracred beast because one of my deck is a cristals beats one. This card is really easy this summon with this desk. My one of my favorite is Hamon and Emerald Tortoise. Hamon and other monster attack, Emerald put Hamon in defence mode, Hamon prevent attacks on my monsters. With a 4000 atk and def, the position don't really matter for Hamon
Fallen paradise at 1 is kinda clunky. I get you wanna search it but losing the 1 of copy to something like a Phoenix makes u lose alot of advantage/protection. 2 works fine imo, it's kinda like a evil necessity.
Really annoyed how all of the main support in the actual structure deck is stuck at one and then it just throws a bunch of random crap that only sort of synergizes with the Sacred Beasts, too bad to, would have considered getting it just to play something gimmicky with friends since this deck isn't really competitive :/
Degenderate Hellscape...(which sounds like an awesome name for a field spell btw) *Me watching anyone that happens to go first perform a twenty card combo for an FTK...* Yup, sounds about right. It's not turning into a Sanctuary in the Sky anytime soon either.
I dont mind the deck but just saying you should add UTOPIC DARK INFINITY Nobody really uses it cause its 2 level 10 but thays a easy summon wih his deck cause you can summon this card then dimension fusion destruction Thanks for listening
I couldn't finish this video. Cimo's heart wasn't into making a decent deck out of this. If I want to listen to someone's advice on a deck, I don't need them trashing it in the beginning. Give it some hope, use your knowledge for some outside of the box tactics. For me, with this deck. Mixing in some syncro monsters gave it surprisingly new options. So I expected more excitement and hope out of a deck profile.
agreed. just won a locals with a slightly modified version of the Team APS decklist. The deck can get some crazy power out of the gate and only gets stronger the longer the game goes. Very sad to see how little he cared about the deck.
One they have t0 he properly summoned for revive.(which means you summon them by their original summon condition Two: summoning them by the summoning beasts effects does not count. That effect is dead in the deck and never comes up.
Play 2-3 fallen paradise, it does what Mound does for sacred beast ontop of giving you a free draw each turn. This idiot (cimo) didnt even read the card to realize that it protects your sacred beasts from targeting and destruction.
@@michaelclark8831 Cimoo and MBT have blind spots that complement each other IMO (which is probably why both were picked for PPG commentary). MBT has a broad grasp on every archetype in the game, but doesn't have the depth. Cimooo has a strong grasp of meta but doesn't understand more obscure rogue picks.
guys I was recently watching cimos 2016 reaction to the banlist and I found it so funny lol I believe cimo is 100% the 2nd funniest yugituber the first is revscards but hey no hate or anything I live in Europe and I love his channel but hey at least in cimo comments we can roast him as much as we want XD jk
Ok few tips for the deck. First being that there were no Cerulean Skyfires. I would run 2 at least. Eldritch is a deck and that card can stop it pretty well. Also if your going add cards to it I would recommend Allure of darkness, Dark Armed Dragon, and field barrier to protect Fallen paradise.
Deck Lock Down is a good continues spell that you can add back with I think it was seven spirit gates. Use foolish to send it and add it back with Seven spirit gates. Sure it can slow you down but as long you have that and Fallen Paradise. You still have some draw power.
You know Cimooo hates the deck if he doesnt have sleeves for the cards
Facts. That and the negative talk about the deck and lack of respect for anything not top tier. It's awesome but he put it straight in the trash basically. Why even make the video at all then??
he just did the video to get that sweet ad revenue. Dude only cares about the meta and it really shows when he does any video that isnt meta geared
For real? :(
@@rcruz1983 For the clicks (money)
@@krislillies7460 true. Very true.
Fallen paradise: "it's too much work for the setup, and even then draws are bad :("
Awakening: "even though it requires double the setup for negation you gotta play it at 3"
Makes sense to me
Fallen paradise also protects the sacred beast from being targeted and destroyed by your opponent's card effects
So free +2 and protection is bad, according to cimooo.
@@faisfaizal5194 not just that, a free +2 every turn you control at least ONE sacred beast
@@mohammadmurie which is not at all hard to do
@@faisfaizal5194 I know as long as you have either spirit gates or dark beckoning beast plus choas summoning beast or dark summoning beast you can end with 2 sacred beasts on the field with fallen paradise active and have the chance to have skyfire and or awakening active on the field as well
You need almerga, spelling?, in the extra deck to pull it off but it is like 50 to 60 cents well withing most people's budgets
ONE only ONE Fallen Paradise ? lmao you did the "Reeshaddoll Wendi" again xd
I cringed when he put one wendi
I think playing 1 paradise is fine in builds without desires is understandable but only one with desires is pure insanity
What's dumb, is he uses 3 of the traps and says having 2 sacred beasts on the field is a bit kf a set up but not too bad and it's worth doing. Yet drawing two cards for free just for having one on the field isn't enough??
@@siritachi31 this is also considering that the main combo with the deck searches fallen paradise and summons a sacred beast.
Fwonchie and it also literally protects them from target effects too.
Must control 1 sacred beast to draw 2: B A D
Must control 2 sacred beasts to skill drain the oponent: B R O K E N
Don't forget the one Reshaddoll Wendi.
😂
It's wind and the wind fusion is like the worst one.
@@Cynic_Scripts then you remember that she is the better target for summoning apkalone with another shaddoll or any shaddoll fusion monster with her as the shaddoll monster, not the attribute one.
@@whatsupguys9716 It was a joke because cimo only played one in his three structure deck shaddolls and that was his reason
@@Cynic_Scripts yah as that stuiped sence windi is starte for the fucking deck wtf jest because of wind that it doesn't matter as it helps get out more founder for fusion summoning
Plays 1 Fallen Paradise cause you need a sacred beast on the field.
Plays 3 Awakening, which wants you to have 2 sacred beasts out.
He is on crack lol
Personally, I subbed out two Fallen for a Phantasmal Martyrs and Hyper Blaze. Like, if I'm already expected to have 2 Sacred Beats out, why not ahave a card that could allow me to summon the third? 🤷♀️
@@TAK1997 Because then you would have to draw into Ravial since you would have to lose your hand and he's the only one that can be summoned from the tokens.
@@animegx45 idk why I thought I could keep raviel in my hand and discard the rest to summon the tokens.. duh if course not! I'm throwing that card away as soon as I get home from work!
Actually no, I'm gonna call home and have my wife do it so I never even have to see it ever again
no offense but I see that you didn't play them that much to know what's best for this deck. Fallen paradise at 1 hhhhh I mean you literally have a sacred beast deck you gonna summon the fucking 4000 points beasts anyway, so fallen paradise is so important, it gives some immunity to them which is what you really need and it gives you drawing power even more awesome than desires. So in a deck centred on sacred beasts summoning, fallen paradise is a MUST ! Not to mention that hamon spell card, I mean this was another ridiculous part of this video literally ! and man desires shouldn't be played for this deck at alll, all cards are important in this deck that needs deck cards to be able to work, desires is ruining this deck and I don't know why konami put it in there, I mean I would have loved some ash blossom or a hand trap! anyway that's just an opinion of someone who loves and plays sacred beast a lot !
Pot of desires is expensive-ish so it was just there to have a common reprint for the competitive players. Also ash blossom got printed in soul burner.
Xtreme Blaze it was reprinted in the Endymion structure deck already, as common
I agree completely, except for the fact that "Pot of Desires" doesnt work. It should indeed not be at 3, because you would risk getting 2 pots in 1 game, but it is very handy to play 2. You dont want to interfere with the combo, but after comboing off with the summoning / beckoning beasts and using "Fallen Paradise", it is very useful because you really want to see "Cerulean Skyfire" and "Awakening of the Sacred Beasts" in the first turn rather than the second.
@@mrjazper yeah but you can summon sacred beasts and get to draw thanks to paradise andwith desires you risk to sent let's say all the copies of a sacred beast and then be unable to use armityle.
@@zorcnecro6910 that is very true, but since I dont use armityle as a key card, but more as a Rogue option to win, I dont really prefer having 3 different beasts in the game above 2, as long as those two are Hamon and Raviel, at least. And extra cards are always nice
I'm gonna be honest I don't like the way you build decks that aren't "meta". You're clearly only focused on the meta which is fine. But Yu-Gi-Oh! is that much more fun when you're playing with decks that don't see that much play. The meta decks are of course more powerful, but always playing with and against the same decks isn't really that fun after some time.
Based on playing competitively you do give good information.
Thats true people that just want to play against friends with this deck shouldnt be so discouraged
Exactly, it looks so gosh darn boring when you just watch one person take forever to get out all their monsters on the field. Like how is that fun?!
No Celestrial Fire with Harmon. That continues spell can literally stop any spell/trap. As long Harmon there. But it very easy to set it up.
also changes Hamon to defense mode after the use but Hamon has the effect that makes it so that only it can be the target for the attack protecting the 0/0 monsters or any low attack monsters like the predaplant verte anaconda, if you have one on the field, as 4000 defense is quite hard to get over as most of the time if people use it they just leave it on the field
It can also stop super poly which is insane.
Also skyfire does not negate the activation of that spell or trap card but the effect of that spell or trap card
@@mohammadmurie Even better since that means if you negate a s/t that has a hopt they can't activate a second copy of that card the same turn.
@@AxisChurchDevotee yeah as the new ruling on how negates works only applies to the attempt to activate something not the attempt to use that effect, I believe
Unbreakable meta board...
Cimo: Just slap a Kaiju on it!🤣
Why Slap a Kaiju when you can slap your golden ball on it lol
@@Desipapa8989 because the kaiju doesn't take your normal summon.
@@nightsider2705 Why get rid of 1 negate when you can get rid of 3? No normal summon is a fair tradeoff with how much people invest on their turn 1 board and sphere mode wrecks their strategy for the game.
I side in 1 sphere mode and 1 vaskii. You are guaranteed to have atleast 1-2 of the main deck 0/0 Beasts on the board at all times. Pretty niche, but removing 3 threats and 1 card each turn can come in clutch
I actually tested out the ocg copy of this deck on duellingbook and had a pretty good list that didn't run Uria. If I opened either Opening of the Gates or Dark Beckoning Beast, I would usually end on Hamon and Raviel.
Combo: Activate either Gates or Dark Beckoning Beast in hand to search the other,
Then use that card to search Chaos Summoning Beast or Dark Summoning Beast (you'll also need a copy of the other in your hand).
Tribute Dark Beckoning Beast for Dark Summoning Beast. Then tribute that for either Hamon or Raviel.
Discard chaos summoning beast with the effect of opening of the gates and revive it (this is a legal play)
Banish dark summoning beast for the other Sacred Beast that you didnt summon.
Tribute Chaos Summoning Beast and Special Summon the other SB.
Banish Chaos Summining Beast to add Fallen Paradise and activate it to draw 2 cards.
From there any extra cards you have like Awakening, or the Hamon Spell are really helpful. If you can survive with the board you can usually win. Just like any other combo hand traps stop it dead in its tracks.
Without uria you can't go into armityle and I really like big number
Love how you don’t even care about showing your hate to the deck
No sleeves and talking crap
God bless that Sweet revenue
I shouldn't have been surprised how quick this was
What did you do to chika
@@Luckyfin yes
I've been waiting all day
So no Sky fire. Only 1 Fallen paradise and 3 Kaijus......this feels like Cimo not giving a shit about a very potential deck just like Zombie Horde
If Konami does another structure deck poll next year I would want Guardians to be one of the choices and win since that archetype deserves some good cards with one that can bypass their summon restriction, having butterfly dagger unbanned, and errata the celestial sword so you can use both it’s effect and Eato’s effect in the same turn.
6:33 "It's kinda unfortunate that it's in Sacred Beasts"
On the contrary- Legacy support that is exclusive to the Archetypes they were made for is something we need more of, lest we see more Archetypes get the short end of the stick like Dark Magician and Crystron got.
The next entrypoint from here is spending over $500 on an Eldlich sacred beast engine deck.
Day 90 of waiting for Vendread support.
Vendread will get their support someday. They're too cool not to.
It’s a funny meme kinda comment but like some other guy pointed out a lot of archetypes have been waiting for support for way longer.
@@DaRealistInIt I'm mainly doing it because Vendread from its inception was never really good, it had tons of promise with Code of the Duelist but konami shafted the deck in its support in Circuit break and Flames of Destruction, and when avendread savior got revealed it turned out that it wasn't really doing much by himself, that and vendread was the first archetype i put together ever since i saw a Revendread Slayer in my first pack of Code of the Duelist.
D.D Slayer I see I see
I waited for this video for like a month. Never been this disappointed by a cimooo video
The deck building in this version is just plain bad, even worse is the lack of respect for the deck. This profile is almost as bad as the shaddoll one.
Got a better budget version?
@@cmen9537 Yes I do, this is my 3 structure only version.
MONSTERS: 20
Raviel, Lord of Phantasms - Heaven-Crushing Fist x1
Raviel, Lord of Phantasms x2
Hamon, Lord of Striking Thunder x2
Uria, Lord of Searing Flames x1
Dark Summoning Beast x3
Dark Beckoning Beast x3
Chaos Summoning Beast x3
Chaos Hunter x2
Radian, the Multidimensional Kaiju x3
SPELLS | 13
Pot of Desires x3
Dimension Fusion Destruction x2
Fallen Paradise x2
The Seven Spirit Gates Unleashed x3
Cerulean Sky Fire x2
One for One x1
TRAPS | 7
Hyper Blaze x1
Dark Factory of More Production x3
Sacred Beast Awakening x3
EXTRA DECK | 6
Armityle the Chaos Phantom x3
Phantasm Emperor Trilojig x3
@@redcompanyINC nice tyvm. Will try that out
@@redcompanyINC And i don't need to add any extra cards that are not in the structure deck to improve it?
@@cmen9537 yes you can, in fact I recomend you do. Simple budget cards like foolish burial, monster reborn, reasoning, effect veiler and call by the grave do a lot for this deck.
Why does everyone say Shimmering SKY Scraper. Where does the word Sky come from
Cause yugioh players don't actually read their cards.
@@DuelistKoi93 ah yes how could I have forgotten
It's referencing his hidden effect. A lot of people don't realise that the new Raviel has an additional effect that isn't written on the card. Just like the winged dragon of Ra. While you control the new Raviel "If an "Elemental HERO" monster attacks a monster that has a higher ATK, the attacking monster gains 1000 ATK during damage calculation only."
Imagine building this “competitively” and running Uria.
Imagine building this “competitively” and only running one Fallen Paradise (psst, the Sacred Beasts are kinda vulnerable to card effects. They kinda need the protection. Double psst if you aren’t getting the “set up” for Paradise (Summoning a Sacred Beast on your first turn) then you’re losing)
Sorry Cimo but on a casual and competitive basis this build is wrong.
Fallen Paradise: Nah
Pot Of Desires: Absolutely
what, shimmering skyscraper
it's shimmering scraper
who's your favorite, #Ham, #Oreo or #Ravioli
#Oreo
#Oreo
Oreo
Ravioli
@@uriathemonarchmasterlordof3984 Very nice name
Hey Cimo,
What are your thoughts on Legendary Duelist Season 1? Not sure if you're making a video on the set.
What is there to talk about?
Day 3 of waiting for GOOD Felgrand/Divine Dragon Lord Support to arrive.
Did you know that Felgrand Dragon appeared in statue form in the artwork of "Trade-In" ?Ironically if you use Trade-In to send Felgrand Dragon to the graveyard that way you cannot revive it without ignoring its summoning conditions.
nice
Omg yesss i would love new support
I do tweet every day (@Yslohr) with the counter and say something Felgrand related if you want to stay up to date :)
Can you really trust the words of a man who does a deck profile without sleeves?
You sleeve cards, not dung.
Would Rather see a 50-100$ deckprofile than 3 structure decks just glued together
The deck is mainly targeting budget players, let's not forget there's usually budget players in every tcg player base
@@duelknight But whats budget about this, its literally 3 Structure decks slapped together without a single addition/replacement.
Anyone can make a decent deck out of 3 Prebought Decks due to the limited amount of cards but adding or replacing small cards to enhance the power, thats sth worth getting inspiration from others as you wont have every card in mind that could make the deck better
He just dont care about this deck and it shows
As someone who playtested Sacred Beasts a bit online... IK running a lone copy of a field spell is a bit of thing recently (look at Salamangreats, Orcust, & Dragon Link), but 1 copy of Fallen Paradise is sooooooo wrong! It protects your Sacred Beasts & lets you go +2, like how is that a 1 of? It's a 2-3 of w/o a doubt, man this is the Reeshaddoll Wendi scenario all over again! (& don't get me started on 3 Awakening, Desires, & no Cerulean Skyfire)
Ok someone can explain the advantages of Pot of Desires and why I should play them. Banish 10 cards for to only draw 2 cards?! Because i don't see it.
pod is a really situational card that you deck i needs to be kind of build around it. if your deck requieres the use of all the cards available for the deck, dont play pod as it is going to prevent you from playing yugioh. but if your deck can maintain itself with the loss of 10 cards then play it as the +2 you are getting from it is going to give you an eage. do if you are playing a sacred beast deck do not play pod as it is going to destroy your deck, let alone 3 of them. fallen paradise is so much better for the deck as the focus of the deck is to summon the sacred beast, and fallen gives them protection from targeting and effects plus a pot of greed every turn if you control a sacred beast, and it is searchable with chaos summoning beast. his deck profile is so bad that anyone with even the most casual experience with yugioh can see that he does not give a crap about making a good build.
Man, ever since the progression series started I'm actually disappointed cimo drops another video. I kinda feel bad lol
i better sacred beasts x3 or dinomasher's fury x3? i play for fun and i want to perform some fun combo, but at the same time i want to do some otk things
It's a bummer that you didn't put your heart and soul into this deck like other videos I've seen. Other duelists who believe the deck has potential; they know it has potential.
I'm gonna build it but not this build you are showing us.
Yubel could have been here if it wasnt a structure deck only deck, but still even about the structure deck, it must have been into it.
I love this deck so far. Never realized how easy it is to summon Armityle and OTK opponent with it on like turn 1 or two. Using it as this decks win condition for sure.
Cimoooo i really love you and i'm not saying this out of hatred, but you really did an awful job at looking the real potential here.
sacred beast deck is not gonna be meta, thats a fact, but you lacked in depth analysis just because of that.
your suggestions about: Fallen paradise, pot of desires,swords, the 2 of any beast like they can do the same things and it doesn't matter anyway , are why i'm saying that.
Please,if you're not interested in any way in a deck, don't post just for the sake of posting a video, or at least put in some more research.
oh and you didn't even mention cerulean sky fire...wich is a negate + putting hamon on def.
Cimo, make a shirt that says...
"I probably completely butchered that..."
I would love to see CIMO battle this deck online! Lol
No cerulean skyfire??? That’s a whole spell negate
hey if I were to make a side deck what cards would you suggest adding to the side deck?
You just did an opening video for this product yesterday. Why'd you do it again?
Finally I can summon my Ravioli more easily, heck yes!
Is it just me that sees the connection between the new Raviel and the summoning beasts and the Lair of Darkness deck, legit throw in the Kaijus you get as well and play Lair as well as Opening of the Spirit Gates and the standard Raviel Lord of Phantasms as well, that's a legitimately good dark fiend tribute based deck, I think it can work with possibly a Monarch or Shaddoll engine too
I would love to see you redo the $100 dinosaur deck considering they just rereleased the deck and Dino’s are still meta
I have a question. If you special summon one of the gods of this deck with chaos summoning beast and then activate the effect of hyper blaze can you special summon from grave a god ignoring its summoning conditions?
No, because they were never properly summoned first
Sam: "Fallen Paradise" is so good. We'll put it at 2. It's literally a pot of greed.
Cimo: "Fallen Paradise" is so bad. We'll put it at 1. If it gets banished thats ok. (Same guy that tells us anything that gives us a +1 is good)
nice video by the way.
Hey Cimmoo I wanted to ask you a quick question and I hope you can read this and answer but do you think that Yu-Gi-Oh is dead or gone? Ive been playing for a long time and I am a returning player and I took the time to watch the anime and learn all the summoning mechanics and I really did enjoy it and the anime really made it fun and enjoyable for me at least, but I see people bringing out these points that master rule 4 killed the game along with the banlist and I want to hear from you if you see and read this, is Yu-Gi-Oh dying?
I have another question. Can someone explain me the second effect of the awakening of the sacred beasts? What does it mean the activated effects of your apponent's monsters
Basically, it negates the effects of monsters that activate. What it cannot negate is continuous effects, such as the Skill Drain effect of Destiny HERO - Plasma
Unless you’re summoning the Sacred Beasts in Kagemaru’s voice, don’t slap those cards down 😂 great video as usual Cimo!
True. these gods are pretty sacred.
I'm looking to get back into yugioh would this be a good budget OTK deck? The newly revealed fusion monster makes me really hopeful...
Machina is better for that
Well that was fast
I have two dogman... should I swap anything out for one or two dogman?
2 dogman and 2 chupacabra are a good ratio if those are the only dangers you've got.
Mikey Linares ok thanks!
Is there much in this deck that's splashable into other decks, or is it pretty much only usable alongside Sacred Beasts? Cuz if the cards can be played in other decks I'd be more keen to pick these up.
Dark bekonning/ spirit gates + one discard is a curius setup.
Activate gates.
Add bekonning
Normal bekonning.
Add chaos summoning.
Normal chaos summoning.
Make linkuribuh.
Revive chaos summoning mit gate.
Make relinquished anima.
Now you can make curius.
Archfiends, dangers, darkworld, and believe it or not abyss actors can mesh with dark summoning beast to get raviel on board. I'm sure there are others but I've only tried the ones above before with raviel.
They're not that bad if you made a non budget version. This deck can definitely top regionals at the very least for sure.
No. It can't. If you play against any meta deck and don't open called by the grave, none of your combos are resolving and you get to summon MAYBE one Sacred Beast and then just pass.
Awesome, so can we next have a Competitive version of the deck.
No such thing
you and Nym should duel with both decks.
6:05 Shimmering skyscraper?? 😂😂😂
Wait a minute
I would play at least 1 cerulian skyfire maybe hyper blaze isn't good enough but a deck based around awakening should probably play the other negate
Noob question (so long with out playing ) will you be doing a playlist with all the foundation generic ruling just like the level 1 basic judge rules people need to know ; ?? never was any good ( just a collector )
for some reason i thought it said invoker
My strat with my sacred beast deck is just to try to mill the 3 sacred beasts and then just use the probably searched fusion spell to summon armityle and otk my opponent
Question:
if there is zombie world in the field and there can be only one in the field and i have ash in field can i normal summon Serziel ( Fiend Type ) ?
No, because Serziel would become a Zombie monster when it hits the field
Honestly worst deck profile you ever did cimoo
Honestly if you wanna run a really good sacred beasts limit uria to 1 and get rid of his trap support “hyper blaze”
Cimoooo.
What other archetype do you think you can combine with sacred beast to make it more competitive?
Eldlich and Orcust
I play with Hamon, the yellow scracred beast because one of my deck is a cristals beats one. This card is really easy this summon with this desk.
My one of my favorite is Hamon and Emerald Tortoise. Hamon and other monster attack, Emerald put Hamon in defence mode, Hamon prevent attacks on my monsters. With a 4000 atk and def, the position don't really matter for Hamon
I have waiting all day for this video. Can't wait to get my copies. Can you try to do one specific for each sacred beast?
Toon table is the best searcher oppening of the spirit gates is a yoke
Fallen paradise at 1 is kinda clunky. I get you wanna search it but losing the 1 of copy to something like a Phoenix makes u lose alot of advantage/protection. 2 works fine imo, it's kinda like a evil necessity.
Can u discard a shimmering scraper to boost a shimmering scraper attack since it has the original versions name within its name?
no, it only works with the original Raviel
everybody shittin on cimooo his profiles are solid. if it werent for the desires fallen paradise is so searchable 1 can be all you need
You need 2 at minimum.
Might have to test this build out on my own channel and see if it can really hold up in a gauntlet of meta matches 🤔🤔🤔
Love these videos!
Cimooo please read fallen paradise
Remember, these are yugioh players. Reading is hard.
@@timestarmagician8654 and cimo only cares about meta, so reading is EXTREMELY hard for him
Definitely could expand the extra deck to move plays better... with a hand trap or 2 as well, this deck would not be to bad🤙🏼
honestly with desires you need 2 field spell i get your point but it is pot of greed every turn
I bought 3 decks, did opt for sleeves.
Thanks Alex, very cool.
I would buy this coz i loved Gx but they are $20 each here T~T
Rip sorry buddy
@@luisrivera4604 T~T thanks bud
Really annoyed how all of the main support in the actual structure deck is stuck at one and then it just throws a bunch of random crap that only sort of synergizes with the Sacred Beasts, too bad to, would have considered getting it just to play something gimmicky with friends since this deck isn't really competitive :/
Degenderate Hellscape...(which sounds like an awesome name for a field spell btw)
*Me watching anyone that happens to go first perform a twenty card combo for an FTK...*
Yup, sounds about right. It's not turning into a Sanctuary in the Sky anytime soon either.
No terraforming?
Lol my friends bought the Shadoll and phantom/Nordic decks so I just bought 3x this deck
I dont mind the deck but just saying you should add UTOPIC DARK INFINITY
Nobody really uses it cause its 2 level 10 but thays a easy summon wih his deck cause you can summon this card then dimension fusion destruction
Thanks for listening
I couldn't finish this video. Cimo's heart wasn't into making a decent deck out of this. If I want to listen to someone's advice on a deck, I don't need them trashing it in the beginning. Give it some hope, use your knowledge for some outside of the box tactics.
For me, with this deck. Mixing in some syncro monsters gave it surprisingly new options. So I expected more excitement and hope out of a deck profile.
agreed. just won a locals with a slightly modified version of the Team APS decklist. The deck can get some crazy power out of the gate and only gets stronger the longer the game goes. Very sad to see how little he cared about the deck.
Yo I love his shirt 🙂
WHAT'S GOING ON GUYS
hyper blaze literally specials a sacred beast from the grave and you play 0?
One they have t0 he properly summoned for revive.(which means you summon them by their original summon condition
Two: summoning them by the summoning beasts effects does not count. That effect is dead in the deck and never comes up.
To be*
@@timothysmith2308 You're wrong. When you use hyper blaze's effect you ignore summoning conditions
Mound of the Bound Creator🤔?!
Play 2-3 fallen paradise, it does what Mound does for sacred beast ontop of giving you a free draw each turn. This idiot (cimo) didnt even read the card to realize that it protects your sacred beasts from targeting and destruction.
@@LowTier4Life I've only been following Cimo and MBT since the quarantine. I agree that they're both idiots.
@@michaelclark8831 Cimoo and MBT have blind spots that complement each other IMO (which is probably why both were picked for PPG commentary).
MBT has a broad grasp on every archetype in the game, but doesn't have the depth. Cimooo has a strong grasp of meta but doesn't understand more obscure rogue picks.
Any “competitive” version ideas ??
What did i say last video???😂
I new the drill, you knew the drill :P
I wish I had a new drill too :(
You make do with what you get would be the saying for sacred beasts
The new armatial fusion good
Woow like it, on my channel I've made a psy-frame deck profile
I mabie gonna buy 3 of thoes just for the reprints
guys I was recently watching cimos 2016 reaction to the banlist and I found it so funny lol I believe cimo is 100% the 2nd funniest yugituber the first is revscards but hey no hate or anything I live in Europe and I love his channel but hey at least in cimo comments we can roast him as much as we want XD jk
It's interesting as I have never played Sacred Beasts but I do have to say that the level 10 4k fusion monster is just terrible
Ok few tips for the deck. First being that there were no Cerulean Skyfires. I would run 2 at least. Eldritch is a deck and that card can stop it pretty well. Also if your going add cards to it I would recommend Allure of darkness, Dark Armed Dragon, and field barrier to protect Fallen paradise.
Deck Lock Down is a good continues spell that you can add back with I think it was seven spirit gates. Use foolish to send it and add it back with Seven spirit gates. Sure it can slow you down but as long you have that and Fallen Paradise. You still have some draw power.
Somethings wrong he hasn’t uploaded today XD