@@Morden97 I've got both these games and you're talking out of your arse fella. Cyberpunk graphically is no superior to this game, just a totally different style and environment.
This game will be an amazing backward compatibility benchmark once next Gen gets here years from now. Revisiting this games performance with the uncapped frame rate toggle will be fascinating.
"Backwards" is definitely the right call when it comes to this author's antiquated transphobic views, though certainly not backwards compatible with basic neurology, science, not to mention tolerance and understanding.
@@sheLuvsManny People like him act like they are doing something. Instead of fighting wars on the internet they should go and do something actually usefull for this people they are defending so much.
I've been posting around that in some games sharpness at 25 and super resolution high can make performance modes look much sharper. Super resolution needs a sharpness of at least 25 to work very well. This is for anyone with LG tva
Devs definitely didn't acknowledge the hateful individual they decided to work for before they performed a failsauce on the game's optimization. They seem a little slow on the uptake on multiple fronts.
@@darkshadow6556 you literally have some of the highest possible specs, for people with inferior systems it's a mess, even with the 30xx rtx cards the performance isn't on par
@@darkshadow6556 have some sense when you comment. Is there anything better than a 4090 now ? If not just don't comment here. This is about performance review and optimisation. Not throwing your money to get a rocket ship and boasting that you got to the next street in less that a millisecond.
performance on PC really needs more tweaks. Ryzen 7700x 32GB with 2TB m.2 PCL-e4.0 RTX3080Ti can run only 110-120fps with RT off at 1080p. Running this game in 4k on my PC may be too slow and unplayable.
man tell me about it, saddens me that we might have to wait a bit for it to be properly playable at full capacity settings, have you tried the method where you disable control flow guard and enable hardware accelerated gpu scheduling? it helped my pc on my end
3080 and I'm getting awful performance. Only about 50% GPU usage and RT is unusable, it turns into a slideshow every minute (not exaggerating). DLSS also works as well as AMD's FSR and still runs the same with neither, it's totally broken.
@@trunksbriefs4132 What CPU you running? Its extremely CPU bound, not GPU bound lol hence why its so unstable and why DLSS and FSR run the same - you'r egetting no uplift. This is why people with no idea about PC hardware and how it works shouldn't comment aha
Great comparison but you need to slow down. 5 call outs on the screen at once and disjointed commentary with what we have to read on screen makes it hard to follow
The best way to enjoy this game isn't just on ps5, it's on any system of your choice without any butthurt LGBTQ+ boycotters spoiling the story for you.
It used up lots of RAM on my PC, up to almost 20 GB used at Ultra 1440p settings and this just for interior scenes. Great game but crap optimization, could learn a thing or two from Mundfish developer of Atomic Heart.
My take on pefromance differences between XSX and PS5 in different modes: - PS5 uses a low level API based on Vulkan, which is definitely WAY MORE EFFICIENT than DX12, specially on CPU drawcalls. Considering how heavy is on CPU the RT mode and performance modes, it's clear why PS5 ends up with an advantage. The API. - XSX packs a ~15-20% more powerful GPU, when the GPU horsepower starts to be the bottleneck, which happens at higher resolutions, the difference starts to move in favour of the Microsoft machine. People also should have in consideration than XSX moves the PC version, which is, in most of the cases, developed on DirectX12 for PC and ported to Xbox, that gives the MS console a clear disadvantage, despite being faster on the hardware side, the software and work put on the version have also a lot to say. Microsoft should optimize DX12 way more and devs should work a bit harder on DX versions of their games, as well on the port to XSX/S.
On the Series X, If your playing in fidelity RT mode with the 30fps cap, does it still have enough stutters or drops below 30 that you would recommend not using it?
RT mode was much better after first patch but now after latest patch it’s bad again why do devs say they fix performance issues when it’s a lie and things are just worse over 2 weeks wait for that patch just for the performance in all modes made worse
Everyone in comments: ”the game is so badly optimizedddd!!” Me: ”okay”, enjoying an unprecedented scale potter game with massive world, gorgeous visuals, smooth performance mode, and a 3 sec loading screens on ps5☕️ Yes the pc port stutters more, that’s because game engine data structures are better optimized for consoles. It’s a common problem.
RT mode with frame rate cap and motion blur is my preferred mode on this game. Looks and plays great, and that's coming from someone who refuses to play anything lower than 60fps this generation.
@@VAL3NTIN3 motion blur keeps me from getting a headache on low framerate ps5 games. I’m used to 144-165 from my pc and when I go to my VRR 120hz Sony OLED all my games still look choppy and make my head hurt. Motion blur fixes this 🤌🏻 (obviously 120fps games are fine but there’s always that one guy🙄)
PS5 is only a $400 machine with an AMD Oberon. Why would anyone compare it with a gaming PC? Even $1200 PC with an rtx 3060ti with an I7 is just about the same as a PS5 in performance. It is much easier for developers to optimize games on a console than a gaming PC. That's why if you run VR games, you need an rtx 2070 super to compare with the PS5. The PS5 design takes into account PSVR 2.
Vulkan is holding current gen back. Still no next gen games that utilize hardware mesh shaders or velocity architectur. This creats bottlenecks forceing cards to run software solutions that they where not designed for.
@@jeddediajohnson9179 do you even know what Vulkan is? Vulkan is a low level API which promotes greater CPU utilisation, resulting in more draw calls and better GPU utilisation, and has incredibly less hardware/driver overhead. In some regards, it's better than DX 12. It's holding nothing back, and the API itself has nothing to do with "next gen".
@@jeddediajohnson9179 do you have any source to support your argument?? First of all, Vulkan supports mesh shading just like DX12. Secondly, the velocity architecture is the optimised UMA system that Xbox developed for their Series consoles. Both the Series consoles exclusively use DX12 as the graphics API, since it's Microsoft who develops and maintains DirectX. Vulkan has absolutely nothing to do with the velocity architecture. If a game is being developed with DX12 in mind, then the developers don't even care if Vulkan supports a certain feature or not. They have their focus on DX12. In fact, UE4/5 doesn't even have a stable Vulkan branch of the engine. Both the engine exclusively uses DX11/DX12. No offense, but it feels like you have no clue about what you're talking about.
Sad to see so called NEXT GEN consoles had go lower than 50 fps for graphical fidelity. But is it justifiable for the price of 399 usd? Or would you spend over 1500 usd on pc?
These consoles will never hit 60 fps consistently with the resolution and fidelity they want to achieve. Get a PC. Stop expecting 4K 60 fps out of these $500 boxes.
@@darkshadow6556 Actually PS5 is more powerful than 95% of consumer pcs out there. Developers are forced to lower graphics for most pcs. Thats why PS5 exclusives like upcoming Spiderman 2, Wolverine look best
@@DONPAPAJONbalanced was capped at 40fps on PS5 uncapped on Series X. Not sure why Michael chose to compare like that but at the end of the day. Both consoles pretty much tie up
Its such a shame for xbox series x who has higher float number to deliver lower overall framerate consistency in most recent titles，one thing Microsoft never disappoint us is that they always dissapoint us, Sony's less core higher frequency trick clearly speaks for itself
Does anyone know, in the future will the Series X version run just as well as the PS5 version after it has been patched and updated? Or will the PS5 version always be superior and run smoother? Thanks!
The xbox one has it's own I/O hardware so it shouldn't cause a cpu bottleneck. At worse the slower ssd might cause it to stutter while it waits for the data.
@ExemplaryEnglishman u sound like a spoiled brat, who gets everything bought for them by a rich Daddy. U ever had to work for anything in your life? Nerve of some people today.
Not a review it’s a take on all the graphic modes across pc and consoles. They did a better job here than digital foundry at least which took them ages too as the goofy one decided he doesn’t like open world games anymore.
The PS5 memory architecture has some advantages over the XBX one, this directly translates into better framerates for memory intensive games like this one. No surprise here. If they can fit the game within 10GB memory limit, then the XBX would reclaim the performance crown but alas this is not the case in this game.
Or maybe Sony has a marketing deal with the studio making sure no other platform outperforms the ps5. you know like they did with Resident Evil and capcom
@@MrRafie82 with courts allowing access to Sony's exclusivity/marketing contracts with studios we will find out if Capcom was the norm or the exception
Damn man... if only this game had better enemy variety it would have been the perfect fan service game for me. Once you fight goblins and spiders for the 500th time it gets pretty old.
It is weird actually, as they have a whole book of beasts they could use (some of which they used for you to catch and store in the Room of Requirement)
Denuvo is still there in the EMPRESS crack. It's just being bypassed. EMPRESS did her own magic and fixed some of those memory leaks, improving performance.
Unreal Engine 5 released to developers last year. This game has been in development around 5 years if I'm not mistaken. Hogwarts Legacy 2 will definitely use Unreal Engine 5
PS5 is only the better choice because the PC port is utter garbage, same goes for almost all triple A games that have released this year. Stutter fest on PC. Having a high end rig means nothing these days if developers keep releasing broken ports..
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
I'm still very curious to see how much washed out this will be on switch.
This gonna look like a ps2 game lmao
Harry Potter? More like Merry Pop-Ins
@@mononoaware8529 😂
@@mononoaware8529 yummy
@@mononoaware8529 lmao 🤣
This game definitely has some issue with memory utilization. Better looking games use less memory.
Mention some of those better looking games.
@@kishaloyb.7937 cyberpunk 2077 is a prime example.
@@Morden97 I've got both these games and you're talking out of your arse fella. Cyberpunk graphically is no superior to this game, just a totally different style and environment.
@@Morden97 bro cyberpunk barely runs 60 FPS on a decent build while this game runs better minus the annoying stutters. Both are unoptimized.
Atomic heart being one of them
But the real question is: How does Professor Garlick look in Fidelity RT mode?
3 decades and nothing changes
shes a yummy mummy 🤤
Best comment
bro no
This game will be an amazing backward compatibility benchmark once next Gen gets here years from now. Revisiting this games performance with the uncapped frame rate toggle will be fascinating.
"Backwards" is definitely the right call when it comes to this author's antiquated transphobic views, though certainly not backwards compatible with basic neurology, science, not to mention tolerance and understanding.
@@VesperAegis author not developer goofy find something else to do
@@sheLuvsManny Where is the money going based on the royalties, would you say? What is the game world itself based on?
@@VesperAegis JK Rowling is right. Leftist radicalist like you are the intolerant ones
@@sheLuvsManny People like him act like they are doing something. Instead of fighting wars on the internet they should go and do something actually usefull for this people they are defending so much.
Wife plays this on my Ps5 and looks pretty much flawless to me. Also have super resolution on high on the TV and looks great.
I've been posting around that in some games sharpness at 25 and super resolution high can make performance modes look much sharper. Super resolution needs a sharpness of at least 25 to work very well. This is for anyone with LG tva
Is this getting a release on the GameCube?
Hogwarts 64 is coming out next year, gonna be sweet
Can’t wait to see the FX chip in the SNES scale and rotate my little wizard boy
Was hoping for a Sega Dreamcast release
Yeah also on gameboy with a 8k resolution and 360 steady fps
I'm thinking rather Nintendo Wii, because of the wand and stuff.
Pc performance is atrocious and the fact that the devs haven't even acknowledged this is worse.
Devs definitely didn't acknowledge the hateful individual they decided to work for before they performed a failsauce on the game's optimization. They seem a little slow on the uptake on multiple fronts.
@@VesperAegis mate shut the hell up
@@darkshadow6556 you literally have some of the highest possible specs, for people with inferior systems it's a mess, even with the 30xx rtx cards the performance isn't on par
@@VesperAegisgo away bow petty boyitch.
@@darkshadow6556 have some sense when you comment. Is there anything better than a 4090 now ? If not just don't comment here. This is about performance review and optimisation. Not throwing your money to get a rocket ship and boasting that you got to the next street in less that a millisecond.
This game should have won something at the game awards.
Definitely lots of stuttering issues on my Series X
performance on PC really needs more tweaks. Ryzen 7700x 32GB with 2TB m.2 PCL-e4.0 RTX3080Ti can run only 110-120fps with RT off at 1080p. Running this game in 4k on my PC may be too slow and unplayable.
man tell me about it, saddens me that we might have to wait a bit for it to be properly playable at full capacity settings, have you tried the method where you disable control flow guard and enable hardware accelerated gpu scheduling? it helped my pc on my end
runs amazing at 4k on my Series X
@@nick13b It isnt 4k on your series X thats why :) Except the 30fps mode and even then has dynamic rez and dips below 30 regularly
3080 and I'm getting awful performance. Only about 50% GPU usage and RT is unusable, it turns into a slideshow every minute (not exaggerating). DLSS also works as well as AMD's FSR and still runs the same with neither, it's totally broken.
@@trunksbriefs4132 What CPU you running? Its extremely CPU bound, not GPU bound lol hence why its so unstable and why DLSS and FSR run the same - you'r egetting no uplift. This is why people with no idea about PC hardware and how it works shouldn't comment aha
Great comparison but you need to slow down. 5 call outs on the screen at once and disjointed commentary with what we have to read on screen makes it hard to follow
The best way to enjoy this game isn't just on ps5, it's on any system of your choice without any butthurt LGBTQ+ boycotters spoiling the story for you.
That's HATE speech! Are you are kid? LOL
It used up lots of RAM on my PC, up to almost 20 GB used at Ultra 1440p settings and this just for interior scenes.
Great game but crap optimization, could learn a thing or two from Mundfish developer of Atomic Heart.
My take on pefromance differences between XSX and PS5 in different modes:
- PS5 uses a low level API based on Vulkan, which is definitely WAY MORE EFFICIENT than DX12, specially on CPU drawcalls. Considering how heavy is on CPU the RT mode and performance modes, it's clear why PS5 ends up with an advantage. The API.
- XSX packs a ~15-20% more powerful GPU, when the GPU horsepower starts to be the bottleneck, which happens at higher resolutions, the difference starts to move in favour of the Microsoft machine.
People also should have in consideration than XSX moves the PC version, which is, in most of the cases, developed on DirectX12 for PC and ported to Xbox, that gives the MS console a clear disadvantage, despite being faster on the hardware side, the software and work put on the version have also a lot to say.
Microsoft should optimize DX12 way more and devs should work a bit harder on DX versions of their games, as well on the port to XSX/S.
🤣🤣🤣
so both performance and fidelity are running in 4k？
I’m more confused about these console modes than anything on PC.
I’m curious to wonder how will Hogwarts Legacy will preform on the PS4 come it’s release next month in April.
nah fam, we want to see the Switch version running at 480p/30
It will run properly . If games like read red redemption 2 can run smoothly in ps4 , this is not a great deal
After patches etc which is now better PS5 or Series X?
Looking forward to locking in at a sweet 720p on the PS4
On the Series X, If your playing in fidelity RT mode with the 30fps cap, does it still have enough stutters or drops below 30 that you would recommend not using it?
No usable yes. Buy a PC if you want the best quality
RT mode was much better after first patch but now after latest patch it’s bad again why do devs say they fix performance issues when it’s a lie and things are just worse over 2 weeks wait for that patch just for the performance in all modes made worse
Love this series of videos. Keep them coming
I've got over 100 hours to tbh I've seen very minimal issues it's amazing
SSR means screen space reflection. You dont need to call it SSR reflection. thats redundant.
Comrade, 'reflection' is added so people don't confuse it with THE SSR (Soviet Socialist Republic)
Game is amazing on series s for me
@@darkshadow6556 said like a pleb
Ps5 having gpu issues at 2:02 mine doesn't flicker like that
PS5 performs better than series X
As so often in these days :)
@Jacob just go and watch how optimised this game is like any other game on PC
30fps in this generation is unacceptable
A perfect representation of dated transphobic views. Very slow to catch up. It's a Freudian Slip of its polygon count.
@@VesperAegis lol jesus. Jk Rowling didn't even work on this game it's just a license get over it Harry potter isn't going to cease to exist.
@K O Z M O N A U T mf was tripping over his own stupidity for a chance to mention trans people.
@@VesperAegis The game does have trans people, don't know what you are talking about
Well, than have fun with most "current-gen" games running at 30fps 1080p in the future on SX/PS5
Everyone in comments: ”the game is so badly optimizedddd!!”
Me: ”okay”, enjoying an unprecedented scale potter game with massive world, gorgeous visuals, smooth performance mode, and a 3 sec loading screens on ps5☕️
Yes the pc port stutters more, that’s because game engine data structures are better optimized for consoles. It’s a common problem.
PS5 was the lead platform.
The engine is just unreal 4. It’s just a poorly optimized game on anything but the PS5.
@@ReGo001 Oh that's why. It's using an outdated version of Unreal Engine.
@@KaiLordZA A lot of things are better on paper. Real life can be a hard reality sometimes.
@@KaiLordZA Easily?! No.. The XSX is SLIGHTLY more power on paper. No better than the PS3 was over 360. We've all seen how that went though.
RT mode with frame rate cap and motion blur is my preferred mode on this game. Looks and plays great, and that's coming from someone who refuses to play anything lower than 60fps this generation.
Motion blur is F. N disgusting.
@@VAL3NTIN3 it's not really
@@techedbirb6663 fake account
@@VAL3NTIN3 motion blur keeps me from getting a headache on low framerate ps5 games. I’m used to 144-165 from my pc and when I go to my VRR 120hz Sony OLED all my games still look choppy and make my head hurt. Motion blur fixes this 🤌🏻 (obviously 120fps games are fine but there’s always that one guy🙄)
It's called "poor optimization"
Also with some tweaks you can run PC version with Vulkan API and you get much better performance.
PS5 is only a $400 machine with an AMD Oberon. Why would anyone compare it with a gaming PC? Even $1200 PC with an rtx 3060ti with an I7 is just about the same as a PS5 in performance. It is much easier for developers to optimize games on a console than a gaming PC. That's why if you run VR games, you need an rtx 2070 super to compare with the PS5. The PS5 design takes into account PSVR 2.
Vulkan is holding current gen back. Still no next gen games that utilize hardware mesh shaders or velocity architectur. This creats bottlenecks forceing cards to run software solutions that they where not designed for.
@@jeddediajohnson9179 do you even know what Vulkan is? Vulkan is a low level API which promotes greater CPU utilisation, resulting in more draw calls and better GPU utilisation, and has incredibly less hardware/driver overhead. In some regards, it's better than DX 12. It's holding nothing back, and the API itself has nothing to do with "next gen".
@@kishaloyb.7937 Vulcan is why mesh shaders and velocity architecture are not being used and yes offloading tasks to the cpu and gpu.
@@jeddediajohnson9179 do you have any source to support your argument??
First of all, Vulkan supports mesh shading just like DX12. Secondly, the velocity architecture is the optimised UMA system that Xbox developed for their Series consoles. Both the Series consoles exclusively use DX12 as the graphics API, since it's Microsoft who develops and maintains DirectX. Vulkan has absolutely nothing to do with the velocity architecture.
If a game is being developed with DX12 in mind, then the developers don't even care if Vulkan supports a certain feature or not. They have their focus on DX12. In fact, UE4/5 doesn't even have a stable Vulkan branch of the engine. Both the engine exclusively uses DX11/DX12.
No offense, but it feels like you have no clue about what you're talking about.
Why does my ps5 read performance completely different? I’m getting nearly 60 fps in fidelity w/ ray tracing on my lg oled c2
Been playing balanced on ps5, but forests may push the to sub 40 and it’s a bit annoying
Balanced? Theirs fidelity and performance/performance rt. Whats balanced?
@@philipsparks6089if you have a high end tv or monitor you get five modes. Balance gets 60 fps (120 uncapped) while having fidelity.
@@TrizerFlame high end? My 200 euro IPS has this lol
@@philipsparks6089 Your display must have 120Hz refresh rate to unlock this option
Sad to see so called NEXT GEN consoles had go lower than 50 fps for graphical fidelity. But is it justifiable for the price of 399 usd? Or would you spend over 1500 usd on pc?
It's the devs fault and how badly they utilize the consoles, hopefully they fix it
These consoles will never hit 60 fps consistently with the resolution and fidelity they want to achieve. Get a PC. Stop expecting 4K 60 fps out of these $500 boxes.
@@darkshadow6556 Actually PS5 is more powerful than 95% of consumer pcs out there. Developers are forced to lower graphics for most pcs. Thats why PS5 exclusives like upcoming Spiderman 2, Wolverine look best
@@ajdaniel8128 funny that you're mentioning only 2 games that aren't even out yet
@@ajdaniel8128 what ? How does this even make sense
PS5 performance always better than series X
Not in fidelity and balanced. Xbox was 5-10 fps faster
@@DONPAPAJONbalanced was capped at 40fps on PS5 uncapped on Series X. Not sure why Michael chose to compare like that but at the end of the day. Both consoles pretty much tie up
Its such a shame for xbox series x who has higher float number to deliver lower overall framerate consistency in most recent titles，one thing Microsoft never disappoint us is that they always dissapoint us, Sony's less core higher frequency trick clearly speaks for itself
So what happened on all the games where Series X performs better? Sony disappointed? It's obviously an optimization issue game to game.
@@pureshooter7477 Can you name these games?
@@pureshooter7477 name these games?
@@troybracy2915 Plague Tale Requiem, Dying Light 2, RE Village, Tales of Arise, Fortnight UE5 upgrade, Dead Space, etc There’s quite a few.
@@pureshooter7477also DI2 had more frame rate issues on PS than Series X
Lol He's recommending that people with 120-Hertz displays play the mode that caps the framerate at 40 FPS. Typical IGN.
Balanced mode also looks the closest to fidelity. Performance mode looks totally bare bones and is missing loads of graphical presets.
@@aobrien_ 40 is a waste.
Does anyone know, in the future will the Series X version run just as well as the PS5 version after it has been patched and updated? Or will the PS5 version always be superior and run smoother? Thanks!
How does this game eat up so much system RAM? This game need to be optimized for PC really bad. :(
Getting embarrassing for Xbox at this point
Where’s go that Tflops from Xbox series x? So disappointed.
The Xbox literally won in fidelity and balanced at 5-10 fps faster
Lazy devs and/or Sony money
The unlimited power of the 12 TF will be unleashed later
@@MisterReen😂😂😂😂😂
Xbox 🤦♂️
Will the PlayStation 5 dedicated I/O hardware be the factor in cpu limited areas performing higher than on XBox?
The Xbox is most likely just running the DX12 version of the game. This is why it’s going to share a lot of the pc versions issues
The xbox one has it's own I/O hardware so it shouldn't cause a cpu bottleneck. At worse the slower ssd might cause it to stutter while it waits for the data.
Honestly a little disappointed when horizon forbidden west has incredibly better graphics with a smoother overall experience.
Crazy ign put a better video out than digital foundry lol
Only because they outsourced to NX who probably does the best tech videos outside of DF.
@@carpetfluff35 because they were scared to do a review
NXG is amazing.
Wish they just stick with 60 fps and best graphics to keep it simple
Many patches?
guess those 12 teraflops are actually a flop
Jepp! Ps5 has the better hardware! Simple as that!
Is unreal 4 engine the latest one?
No 5 is
why run FSR when DLSS would be a better to compare too DLSS has proven to be better overall then FSR
It really comes down to the game itself and how it well optimized it is. Clearly it was optimized for Sony more so
Or your shitbox is just that, a shitbox.
This is a dumb comment 🤦🏽♂️
Wait ..in fidelity rt mode Xbox runs at lower frames rate right ? But the Ray tracing looks much better than ps5 !
Xbox Looks worse on every Mode.
@@dondavid822 a great fanboy here
Im sitting on GTX 1650 4 GB, 16 GB DDR4 RAM. The game performance has been alright for me.
@ExemplaryEnglishman u sound like a spoiled brat, who gets everything bought for them by a rich Daddy. U ever had to work for anything in your life? Nerve of some people today.
What’s the best for your PlayStation5 so it’s not running on 🔥
This review is just now coming out, really? IGN, you’re slacking guys.
Probably trying to dodge the death threats from angry trannies.
They're scared of the woke brigade backlash
Not a review it’s a take on all the graphic modes across pc and consoles. They did a better job here than digital foundry at least which took them ages too as the goofy one decided he doesn’t like open world games anymore.
Considering every game has multiple performance patches over the first few months it's better to have some of these spaced out.
is it just me or is this video choppy even at 1080p60
IGN would be nice you display youre pc setup to undestand better the comparison 🤔
@17:36 ???
lol thanks
painful on my Steam Deck
Poor optimization for an Unreal Engine 4 game.
Great game but the lighting issues are the worst I’ve even seen on a game
why even mention 120hz tv's when consoles cant get past 60 fps?
VRR capabilities, usually 120 htz TVs support VRR.
Because their are HDMI 2.1 console features that are exclusive to 120hz TVs.
Not to even mention the MULTIPLE games now that have 120fps modes…
@Md92 👌🏽👌🏽👌🏽 definitely agree with this lol
@@jayroman3384 but the potato cant push past 60 fps on this game. you might get 120 on frogger
@Md92 classic
They could’ve made a beautiful open world game way better then this with these graphics
The PS5 memory architecture has some advantages over the XBX one, this directly translates into better framerates for memory intensive games like this one. No surprise here. If they can fit the game within 10GB memory limit, then the XBX would reclaim the performance crown but alas this is not the case in this game.
Or maybe Sony has a marketing deal with the studio making sure no other platform outperforms the ps5. you know like they did with Resident Evil and capcom
@@Darthnader18😂
@@Darthnader18 😂😂😂 Is it the same for the other games that PS5 outperforms XSX on?
@@MrRafie82 with courts allowing access to Sony's exclusivity/marketing contracts with studios we will find out if Capcom was the norm or the exception
me watching this with 2015' pc built that load the maps in 50 sec : wow interesting
for me about 10 seconds with a 2021 system rtx3070, the ps5 version loads in 2 seconds lol
Damn man... if only this game had better enemy variety it would have been the perfect fan service game for me. Once you fight goblins and spiders for the 500th time it gets pretty old.
The story is a bit meh aswell
@@OllieGrigg Harry Potter has a meh story as well, and still got a huge fanbase
It is weird actually, as they have a whole book of beasts they could use (some of which they used for you to catch and store in the Room of Requirement)
@@josebonifacio6478 nah the story itself is amazing, it could be something great, but this game didn’t do justice. and neither has J.K Rowling.
Wait... This clearly looks much more detailed on serie x 😮 this can't be running on same settings
There is no TOO OLD for Harry Potter. There is just magical or muggle.
and what about the EMPRESS Crack PC without the denuvo that improbe the FPS
Denuvo is still there in the EMPRESS crack. It's just being bypassed. EMPRESS did her own magic and fixed some of those memory leaks, improving performance.
I'm surprised this game has no coop or multiplayer play.
There’s a mod for that
Great Game 😀Have been playing this game for a while now, and I am enjoying it, waiting for Part 2🙂
The difference between performance and balanced is too drastic. Poorly optimised and terrible rendering.
And thats why all my games have went to my ps5 and not my series x
But if even on the ps5 or the Xbox series there are problems, on the switch it will be totally unplayable
cant wait for the switch release its gonna be hilarious playing this at 480p
@@nick13b 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@nick13b 480p on a small screen is no big deal.
Xbox rns at a higher resolution than PS% 1080p
Ps5 continues to outperform the series x..
Stuttering has been insufferable on my pc
How does a game like this struggle on ps5 with games like red dead redemption in existence on the PS4 And looks better too
Newer game, developed with more powerful hardware as the target
It’s a mess on pc
I’m just so sad on where the video games industry is going nowadays
looks like an assassin creed game. Definitely not worth $70 this game should been just next gen
5600/6700xt with 75fps but the stuttering 😅
Thanks
Look at the lighting at 12:30. PS5 lighting looks more natural as compared to the XBawks image that has an artificial hue due to overprocessing.
Why didn't they use Unreal engine 5
Maybe they plan to cross platform at the beginning, because UE5 can`t do that.
Because they started this year's ago
Because they wanted to port it to older platforms. Switch doesn’t have a UE5 distro
@@ReGo001 Doesn't Fortnite run on Unreal Engine 5 now? And Fortnite is on Switch.
Unreal Engine 5 released to developers last year. This game has been in development around 5 years if I'm not mistaken. Hogwarts Legacy 2 will definitely use Unreal Engine 5
On PC it's a dumpster fire.
PS5 is only the better choice because the PC port is utter garbage, same goes for almost all triple A games that have released this year. Stutter fest on PC.
Having a high end rig means nothing these days if developers keep releasing broken ports..
This would make for an absolutely incomprehensible VR game
4 decades? Are you 60 or something?
Anyone else get a white tin when playing in 1440p 120fps?
5600x and a 6800x “my high end pc” 🙄
Still far above the average gaming PC specs
Been playing on PS5. Enjoyed it a lot.
Did you also enjoy the hate and intolerance of the author, per chance?
@@VesperAegis yes actually
@@VesperAegis Me too
@@VesperAegis shouldn't you be at a drag show at a kindergarten ?
@@VesperAegisyes and we all agree with her you petty little boyitch..
This is going to look poor on last gen and the switch
As always, PS5 dominated the Xbox Series X in performance.
Some smartphones are powerful than the switch and yet it’s not coming to mobile 😢
Fuk mobile gaming.
Cause that smartphone is probably more expensive than the switch lol mobile had the least treatment in terms of games😂
Do a review with empress non-denovo version
FIX THE FRICKING PERFORMANCE MODE GHOSTING
when are you going to issue a public apology for your Alien: Isolation score?
One the worst AAA UE presentation in recent years. The assets, models, VFX, and performance are low tiers. Gameplay is decent.
ray tracing is broken in this game, just turn it off
Version Xbox Series X is better 🙌
Ps5 what’s the best?