What do you think of Repressive Tolerance? A: People who say they are inspired by hum have not read it B: some eerie implications C: Agree with most of it but concerned about who & what is defined as who & what D: Marcuse was German & started a movement during the Weimar Republic just like… E: ________________
Wonderful reading! The implications are concern worthy to say the least. He presupposes quite a lot to produces a normative view that is boldly authoritarian.
@@bertwesler1181 ah no way! I am a bit disappointed. Last time i visited my moms village i met a lion named wesler. was going to ask next time i went back if they knew of you :P
That is key. Problems occur not because of what X is but how we define X. I have a followup that discusses Repressive Tolerance & a multi part on "An Essay For Liberation." What does Marcuse mean by X is a regular question during both conversations, and depending on the answer I find much of what he says to be agreeable.
Marcuse is an OCD psychopath who babbles on and on and on repeat after retreat, following the Illumianti Doctrine that if I say a thing 8 times it becomes fact. Hint; It doesn't
Marcuse wasn't in any sect, not Iluminaty, not nothing. He was a Philosophy Professor at a German University. He followed Hegel and Feurbach and then he made his own. With somethings he took from Marx and the most important, what he took from Freud and his International Psychoanalitical School (Adler, Jung, Fromm, and maybe from Karen Horney and Melanie Klein, too). He applied it to our Western societies. Let's say he declares we live in an unbalanced and sick societies. He sustain the illneses (neurosis, depression, paranoias, etc) of men are the society ones. Marcuse analyses and takes toxic (neurotical, obsessive, etc) relations with other people, and bases them in which are the dominating relations. Which are perfectly visible in psychos, e. g. He then states that a domination relation is intrinsically perverse and ethically to be condemned. And he goes on saying that even in democracies, women and men keep on establishing domain relations. Meaning a man dominating another. He says this can be seen in our relation with political powers. And then a repressive tolerance is applied on people when they try to change, subvert or even control their political powers. Through demonstrations and strikes. He also sustains that we live in a Consumer's society, where we are alienated as individuals. This is just part of his thoughts. To mention he was part of the Adorno Philosophy School, may not mean he shared much with those. Hope this has been helpful to understand one of the most important philosophers of past century. 🙄😇🆗⁉️✔️
To suffer OCD has nothing to see with being a psycho. For what I know he was not a psycho, he never was such a thing. Neither have I heard about him suffering OCD.
I see that Marcuse suffers from OCD. He repeats himself ad nauseam, as though he were trying to hypnotize his audience. This is mind rape of the first order. And he puts forth internally, illogical propositions that we can see a priori are wrong. And that if a mind were able to accept his self-contradicting sputum as meaningful, one would have twisted one's head right off their necks. He could finish his entire essay in two short sentences. Fight with the compassion of a lizard; win, win, win. Eye gouging is encouraged. We are Jews~! Oops, three Sir~? Three~?
![Rick Roderick on Marcuse - One-Dimensional Man [full length]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/WNAKr1TQ0xc/mqdefault.jpg)
![Rick Roderick on Marcuse - One-Dimensional Man [full length]](/img/tr.png)
![Hunxho - Ball Forever [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nki9ZTF9Uls/mqdefault.jpg)
What do you think of Repressive Tolerance?
A: People who say they are inspired by hum have not read it
B: some eerie implications
C: Agree with most of it but concerned about who & what is defined as who & what
D: Marcuse was German & started a movement during the Weimar Republic just like…
E: ________________
Marcuse was NOT German. He was a Jew.
@@bertwesler1181 German is a nationality in this use.
Wonderful reading! The implications are concern worthy to say the least. He presupposes quite a lot to produces a normative view that is boldly authoritarian.
Wonderful read.
You're the only person I've ever heard who says Har-Bert instead of Her-Bert.
great reading!
Yes, his name is NOT HARbert, it is HERbert
okay, thanks for the correction.
@@dyingalive happens to be my name. So I guess that makes me an expert.
😆 LOL
@@bertwesler1181 ah no way! I am a bit disappointed. Last time i visited my moms village i met a lion named wesler. was going to ask next time i went back if they knew of you :P
What does Herbert mean by ideology, thanks
That is key. Problems occur not because of what X is but how we define X. I have a followup that discusses Repressive Tolerance & a multi part on "An Essay For Liberation." What does Marcuse mean by X is a regular question during both conversations, and depending on the answer I find much of what he says to be agreeable.
Marcuse is an OCD psychopath who babbles on and on and on repeat after retreat, following the Illumianti Doctrine that if I say a thing 8 times it becomes fact.
Hint; It doesn't
Marcuse wasn't in any sect, not Iluminaty, not nothing. He was a Philosophy Professor at a German University. He followed Hegel and Feurbach and then he made his own. With somethings he took from Marx and the most important, what he took from Freud and his International Psychoanalitical School (Adler, Jung, Fromm, and maybe from Karen Horney and Melanie Klein, too). He applied it to our Western societies. Let's say he declares we live in an unbalanced and sick societies. He sustain the illneses (neurosis, depression, paranoias, etc) of men are the society ones. Marcuse analyses and takes toxic (neurotical, obsessive, etc) relations with other people, and bases them in which are the dominating relations. Which are perfectly visible in psychos, e. g. He then states that a domination relation is intrinsically perverse and ethically to be condemned. And he goes on saying that even in democracies, women and men keep on establishing domain relations. Meaning a man dominating another. He says this can be seen in our relation with political powers. And then a repressive tolerance is applied on people when they try to change, subvert or even control their political powers. Through demonstrations and strikes. He also sustains that we live in a Consumer's society, where we are alienated as individuals. This is just part of his thoughts. To mention he was part of the Adorno Philosophy School, may not mean he shared much with those. Hope this has been helpful to understand one of the most important philosophers of past century. 🙄😇🆗⁉️✔️
To suffer OCD has nothing to see with being a psycho. For what I know he was not a psycho, he never was such a thing. Neither have I heard about him suffering OCD.
I see that Marcuse suffers from OCD.
He repeats himself ad nauseam, as though he were trying to hypnotize his audience.
This is mind rape of the first order.
And he puts forth internally, illogical propositions that we can see a priori are wrong. And that if a mind were able to accept his self-contradicting sputum as meaningful, one would have twisted one's head right off their necks.
He could finish his entire essay in two short sentences.
Fight with the compassion of a lizard; win, win, win.
Eye gouging is encouraged.
We are Jews~!
Oops, three Sir~? Three~?