I've been an avid RUclips car channel fan for many years and I'm really enjoying this homegrown Aussie channel. EVO, MotorTrend and Chris Harris, watchout! Also, to help me afford a new Mazda 2, anyone wanting to buy a 2004 Ford Fiesta LX with only minor death trap issues should call me. I will throw in a free fourth wheel at no extra cost for the lucky buyer. For you, special price!
I found a audi a1 2015 selling very cheap. But Ive been saving for the mazda 2(grand i touring) for a while and I dont know which to choose. Some tell me to choose audi because its a premium car but it seems that the mazda 2 is just a better car overall. I think Ill be getting the mazda 2 grand i touring white model
Downsize engine with their smal low presure turbo, stops around at 3000rpm and above you will notice that the engine is actually too small for the car. And will use more fuel. Mazda N/A engine's loves to revs. More rpm means more power en torqeu. Will match the claimed fuel consumption more, and is more reliable because no susceptible toy turbo.
That thing with the turbo will happen only if you’re going to high speeds, I honestly doubt that Mazda2 will get to even 160 km/h with that naturally aspirated trashy engine, German power is better
@@victor10197 Mazda 2 90BHP topspeed 184km/h 0 to 100 in 9,4 sec. Also available in 115bhp, topspeed 200 km/h 0 to 100 in 8,7sec What 160kmh? So you stick with your lawn mower engine ok? 1.0 3 cilinder. Only little turbo boost in low revs, after that no boost anymore. Then it's stil a smal trashy engine.
Audi a1 1.4t 0-100 8.9s A1 Sline 2.0t 0-100 6.5s +Audi a1 ncap rating 5 stars Mazda 2 rating 4 stars, poor protection child occupants So I prefer my turbo “lawnmower” motor who also is quicker, but my family’s safety is top priority
@@victor10197 Really? a 2.0T is faster than a 1.5 N/A engine? You know what? An 4.0 V8 N/A engine is also faster than a 2.0T. What i want to make clear is, compare with similar power. Example a Polo (same car as a A1) with a 1.0 95bhp is slower than a Mazda 90bhp. Polo 0 to 100 in 10,8 sec. Mazda 2, 4 star crash rating? Check again. Mazda 2 always been a 5star rating. Check you're facts first bro...
curious why mazda only puts those narrow wheels on there, could handle even much better if it were on wider less profile tyres like the other two. would look much nicer, too.
i love how the mazda2 maxx comes with the touchscreen and reversing camera as standard now!
Mazda is the winner, why am I not supprised?🤔
Mazda is nowadays a premium brand
I've been an avid RUclips car channel fan for many years and I'm really enjoying this homegrown Aussie channel. EVO, MotorTrend and Chris Harris, watchout! Also, to help me afford a new Mazda 2, anyone wanting to buy a 2004 Ford Fiesta LX with only minor death trap issues should call me. I will throw in a free fourth wheel at no extra cost for the lucky buyer. For you, special price!
Why does no one talk about Skoda fabia its pretty reliable
Have a look at the safety rating of the A1....
2:02 why is the passenger wing mirror of the Audi A1 folded? :O
+michalis georg Could be it was the first road loop straight off the truck, Nicely spotted.
I found a audi a1 2015 selling very cheap. But Ive been saving for the mazda 2(grand i touring) for a while and I dont know which to choose. Some tell me to choose audi because its a premium car but it seems that the mazda 2 is just a better car overall. I think Ill be getting the mazda 2 grand i touring white model
What did you get?
Downsize engine with their smal low presure turbo, stops around at 3000rpm and above you will notice that the engine is actually too small for the car. And will use more fuel.
Mazda N/A engine's loves to revs. More rpm means more power en torqeu. Will match the claimed fuel consumption more, and is more reliable because no susceptible toy turbo.
That thing with the turbo will happen only if you’re going to high speeds, I honestly doubt that Mazda2 will get to even 160 km/h with that naturally aspirated trashy engine, German power is better
@@victor10197 Mazda 2 90BHP topspeed 184km/h 0 to 100 in 9,4 sec. Also available in 115bhp, topspeed 200 km/h 0 to 100 in 8,7sec
What 160kmh?
So you stick with your lawn mower engine ok? 1.0 3 cilinder. Only little turbo boost in low revs, after that no boost anymore. Then it's stil a smal trashy engine.
Audi a1 1.4t 0-100 8.9s
A1 Sline 2.0t 0-100 6.5s
+Audi a1 ncap rating 5 stars
Mazda 2 rating 4 stars, poor protection child occupants
So I prefer my turbo “lawnmower” motor who also is quicker, but my family’s safety is top priority
@@victor10197 Really? a 2.0T is faster than a 1.5 N/A engine? You know what? An 4.0 V8 N/A engine is also faster than a 2.0T.
What i want to make clear is, compare with similar power. Example a Polo (same car as a A1) with a 1.0 95bhp is slower than a Mazda 90bhp. Polo 0 to 100 in 10,8 sec.
Mazda 2, 4 star crash rating? Check again. Mazda 2 always been a 5star rating. Check you're facts first bro...
@@victor10197 www.ancap.com.au/safety-ratings/mazda/2/7e3c35
Ant this is my source
curious why mazda only puts those narrow wheels on there, could handle even much better if it were on wider less profile tyres like the other two. would look much nicer, too.
interested to see/hear how it compares to the ford fiesta
Fiesta Tripple?
Mazda my choice
The mazda 2 will be more reliable too
Getting paid extra by Mazda?
Audi 1st
The Audi is the same as a Skoda underneath. Why pay for just a badge?
Try the Hyundai i10 2nd Gen...
Is a size smaller car, you have to compare with the Hyundai i20
Mazda2's always break down
You are saying that based on what?
Mazda is not the best for me
interested to see/hear how it compares to the ford fiesta