Very different than speed pro. Clash 100 Pro = standard weight. Ultimate comfort. All around racket with maximum flex. Speed Pro = heavy weight. Maximum control. Dense string pattern.
I bought a Clash 108 v1 - couldn't play with it. Couldn't tell where the ball would land and didn't like the sound it made when the ball hit the strings nor the even balance. It did have very good power and spin but the cost of feel and control was too great. Finally, in an act of desperation, I added lead tape to the 3 and 9 o'clock positions and it played much better as a head heavy racquet. I wish Wilson would give the 108 version a 16x20 string pattern too.
@@SolowSports I was looking to replace my Head MicroGel Radical Oversize with something more modern. So far, the v1 Clash 108 has been a disaster. The balance is wrong for me and the strings slide too easily. Due to elbow problems, I need a flexible, forgiving racquet. The even balance of the Clash 108 makes it slow through the air so I don't get easy racquet head speed and it's not stable nor powerful enough as a slightly head-heavy racquet. The choice was to add a leather grip to make it headlight or to add weight to make it head-heavy. I opted for the latter and is seems to have worked but, so I've been told, defeats the racquet design to twist upon impact with the ball. Finally, I settled on the Head Gravity S (now called the Team) because its 104 head size and semi-dense 16x20 string pattern is closest to the MicroGel Radical in design. I wish I'd waited for the Auxetic version though because the original Gravity has a harsh feel when hitting the ball. I don't use poly strings and instead use Head Velocity or Gamma syngut.
@@tedneanderthal7373 We personally believe there is more to shopping by spec (which we understand is popular for internet shopping). Most rackets have an overall performance. The Radical OS has the spec of being slightly OS but its not truly its identifying factor as a identity or performance. We recommend seeking rackets of a similar performance. The Clash 108 very much has a different performance and is a ultra comfort racket with a large oversize head/sweetspot. What are you top 3 performance goals you seek? There will likely be a racket that performs in that manner.
@@SolowSports Thanks. Manufacturers no longer make racquets that I like - frames with soft flex and semi-dense or dense string patterns. Now, I'm a senior player in my mid-60's and my needs have changed. I'm switching to slightly head-heavy racquets and have been buying lead tape to alter the balance of some racquets to make them more stable and powerful, and to require a shorter swing. I no longer buy 16x19 string pattern racquets - the slice is too floaty and they are designed for hitting topspin that I can't hit hard enough to be offensive. I'm changing back to flatter strokes that are easier to hit and less physically demanding. Trying to hit topspin everything ruined my elbow and damaged my shoulder and, physically, I'm not strong enough (never was). Oddly, I've been testing beginner racquets. Bought an Artengo TR500 oversize and had it strung with a multi and it played great but its 70 RA gave me wrist pain. Similar Babolat Boost 105s no longer come in a 4 1/2" grip size and are still very firm. The closest arm friendly racquet is a Prince Ripstick 280 gram but it's only 100 square inches and has an open 16x18 string pattern. I have a very good 1HBH that I can hit with topspin or slice; my forehand is my weakness - it's a big grip change to a full Eastern grip so I think I'm going to just settle for an old style Chris Evert flat forehand hit with some underspin (and side-spin!) for control. But, I can hit some moderate top if, like Medvedev, I take a loop backswing. Hey, at least I'm still playing! I love hitting tennis balls and the feel of the ball on the strings.
@@tedneanderthal7373 I believe we may have suggested the Dunlop OS previously as the closest to that players OS like the Radical. There was a Donnay OS as well (might be hard to find). I think there are even custom racket manufacturers online that might revive that old style setup today.
Clash Pro v3 = ideal for players 3.5-4.5 who have talent but need some help from the racket. Versatility in shots but not one clear weapon of focus. Injury reduction/prevention at the top of requirements. Two handed backhands are ideal. Just about any grip style is a match. All court gameplay with preference of baseline.
Thank you guys ❤
Our pleasure. Thank you.😁
I swear, that it feels like I am looking at Andre Agassi demo-ing the racket...playing style is so similar, cool reviews as always!
Thank you so much!! Really kind of you to say as he was one of my favorites growing up
Thanks for the review. What would you say the top 5 best racquets for comfort are? And do you think Clash series is #1?
It would depend on the player level. #1 is definitely Clash then others would be Head Gravity, Wilson Triad, Volkl V1, Pro Kennex.
Appreciate the objective review.
Thank you so much! It’s never about is a racket good or bad but really who the best candidate is
I play with the Clash ProV2 and I am in the market for a new racket. I thinking about this or the Ezone 98 to try and inprove my game.
What exactly are you seeking from a racket?
Hello. Difference with speed pro ?t thanks.
Very different than speed pro.
Clash 100 Pro = standard weight. Ultimate comfort. All around racket with maximum flex.
Speed Pro = heavy weight. Maximum control. Dense string pattern.
I bought a Clash 108 v1 - couldn't play with it. Couldn't tell where the ball would land and didn't like the sound it made when the ball hit the strings nor the even balance. It did have very good power and spin but the cost of feel and control was too great. Finally, in an act of desperation, I added lead tape to the 3 and 9 o'clock positions and it played much better as a head heavy racquet. I wish Wilson would give the 108 version a 16x20 string pattern too.
The 108 is certainly geared for a specific audience. Which racket did you switch from?
@@SolowSports I was looking to replace my Head MicroGel Radical Oversize with something more modern. So far, the v1 Clash 108 has been a disaster. The balance is wrong for me and the strings slide too easily. Due to elbow problems, I need a flexible, forgiving racquet. The even balance of the Clash 108 makes it slow through the air so I don't get easy racquet head speed and it's not stable nor powerful enough as a slightly head-heavy racquet. The choice was to add a leather grip to make it headlight or to add weight to make it head-heavy. I opted for the latter and is seems to have worked but, so I've been told, defeats the racquet design to twist upon impact with the ball. Finally, I settled on the Head Gravity S (now called the Team) because its 104 head size and semi-dense 16x20 string pattern is closest to the MicroGel Radical in design. I wish I'd waited for the Auxetic version though because the original Gravity has a harsh feel when hitting the ball. I don't use poly strings and instead use Head Velocity or Gamma syngut.
@@tedneanderthal7373 We personally believe there is more to shopping by spec (which we understand is popular for internet shopping). Most rackets have an overall performance. The Radical OS has the spec of being slightly OS but its not truly its identifying factor as a identity or performance. We recommend seeking rackets of a similar performance. The Clash 108 very much has a different performance and is a ultra comfort racket with a large oversize head/sweetspot. What are you top 3 performance goals you seek? There will likely be a racket that performs in that manner.
@@SolowSports Thanks. Manufacturers no longer make racquets that I like - frames with soft flex and semi-dense or dense string patterns. Now, I'm a senior player in my mid-60's and my needs have changed. I'm switching to slightly head-heavy racquets and have been buying lead tape to alter the balance of some racquets to make them more stable and powerful, and to require a shorter swing. I no longer buy 16x19 string pattern racquets - the slice is too floaty and they are designed for hitting topspin that I can't hit hard enough to be offensive. I'm changing back to flatter strokes that are easier to hit and less physically demanding. Trying to hit topspin everything ruined my elbow and damaged my shoulder and, physically, I'm not strong enough (never was). Oddly, I've been testing beginner racquets. Bought an Artengo TR500 oversize and had it strung with a multi and it played great but its 70 RA gave me wrist pain. Similar Babolat Boost 105s no longer come in a 4 1/2" grip size and are still very firm. The closest arm friendly racquet is a Prince Ripstick 280 gram but it's only 100 square inches and has an open 16x18 string pattern. I have a very good 1HBH that I can hit with topspin or slice; my forehand is my weakness - it's a big grip change to a full Eastern grip so I think I'm going to just settle for an old style Chris Evert flat forehand hit with some underspin (and side-spin!) for control. But, I can hit some moderate top if, like Medvedev, I take a loop backswing. Hey, at least I'm still playing! I love hitting tennis balls and the feel of the ball on the strings.
@@tedneanderthal7373 I believe we may have suggested the Dunlop OS previously as the closest to that players OS like the Radical. There was a Donnay OS as well (might be hard to find). I think there are even custom racket manufacturers online that might revive that old style setup today.
What type of player is it for?
Clash Pro v3 = ideal for players 3.5-4.5 who have talent but need some help from the racket. Versatility in shots but not one clear weapon of focus. Injury reduction/prevention at the top of requirements. Two handed backhands are ideal. Just about any grip style is a match. All court gameplay with preference of baseline.
@@SolowSports is it good for 1hbh?
@@TwoWheels47 Two handers are preferred.
@@SolowSports ok, thanks 👍
Nice scores for this one! 👏 What is your fav Wilson racket?
Personally I like the Clash 98 weighted up.
@ Thanks! 👍
@@DJScharlie Our pleasure. Thank you! Whats your racket of choice?
@@SolowSports98 version 1 or 2?
@@davidashman4839 I always like the latest. I like the v2 with more dense pattern to tame the setup just a bit more.