I agree with other posters. Graff gets so many things wrong and conflates so many things that you have to understand that he is either activly working to throw sand on the UAP fire, or just incredibly ignorant. Starting with an assertion that AARO is revealing truth to the public is ludicrous and been disproven over and over. But what would you expect from a talk at the Gerald Ford Museum.
This guy is completely out of his depth and should have spent a few more years researching before publishing a book on this subject (which came out only one year after his Watergate book). If he knew what he was talking about, he would know how ridiculous it is to claim that the U2 spyplane was responsible for a lot of UFO sightings. If you want to learn about this subject, I recommend Richard Dolan instead - he's spent 30 years researching this and is far, far better infromed.
I love that someone that supposedly did his homework on the subject gets the most base info wrong.... Kenneth Arnold did NOT say he saw 9 "saucers", he said he saw 9 "crescent" shaped craft... that looked like saucers skipping on water.... this dude and many others that "think" they know the deal, haven't a clue what they're talking about...
The speaker is misleading the public here with his presentation. By his own admission he has covered national security. Well, it looks more as if he is part of that national security in attempting *very poorly" (I ight add) to place a spin on the topic that the US government does not really know what is going on. BS on that!
@@Womble1252 funny thing is , that all he would have had to have done is watch about a weeks worth of YT greedible documentaries on the subject, and he could have his facts straight.... I've been interested in the subject for 30-ish years... and its all the same stories told over and over that whole time.... and everything since 2017 is just a bunch of BS, worthless info....
This guy doesn't know anything about the topic. Even basic well documented things. Crazy he wrote a book, and is doing a speaking tour about something he knows so little about.
His book that sold 1 copy (me, I refunded it, though) that has been championed by random news outlets who coincidentally also never acknowledged David Grusch. Yet way better books like "In Plain Sight" are never mentioned.
This is not the place to get valid information on this subject. It is disappointing the curators didn’t have the ability to do more research into the presenter. I don’t care if Garret is a ”friend” of the national archives.
This guy never read the FBI document that was made about the Roswell crash which stated "In the LA case the Army grabbed it (the disk) and would not let us (the FBI) have it for cursory examination." Well the LA likely stood for Los Alamos. However, Wright Patterson Field was (in 1947) the home of the ATIC or Air Technical Intelligence Center were any foreign rockets, craft, or debris were taken for study. Mr. Graff has either not done his homework or simply wanted to give a pedestrian (official US government cleared) POV on a subject certain people would like to see go away.
![NOSFERATU - Official Trailer [HD] - Only In Theaters December 25](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nulvWqYUM8k/mqdefault.jpg)
![NOSFERATU - Official Trailer [HD] - Only In Theaters December 25](/img/tr.png)
is this guy meant to sow chaos and disinformation? He gets so many facts just.... wrong
Either he’s absolutely clueless or well…. Yes he is in fact a disinfomation agent hired from the media
I agree with other posters. Graff gets so many things wrong and conflates so many things that you have to understand that he is either activly working to throw sand on the UAP fire, or just incredibly ignorant. Starting with an assertion that AARO is revealing truth to the public is ludicrous and been disproven over and over. But what would you expect from a talk at the Gerald Ford Museum.
This guy is completely out of his depth and should have spent a few more years researching before publishing a book on this subject (which came out only one year after his Watergate book). If he knew what he was talking about, he would know how ridiculous it is to claim that the U2 spyplane was responsible for a lot of UFO sightings. If you want to learn about this subject, I recommend Richard Dolan instead - he's spent 30 years researching this and is far, far better infromed.
Arrow is joke
I love that someone that supposedly did his homework on the subject gets the most base info wrong.... Kenneth Arnold did NOT say he saw 9 "saucers", he said he saw 9 "crescent" shaped craft... that looked like saucers skipping on water.... this dude and many others that "think" they know the deal, haven't a clue what they're talking about...
Yes I noticed that.. and he really missed so much more too, could do with alot more research before trying to educate the public on this topic..
The speaker is misleading the public here with his presentation.
By his own admission he has covered national security. Well, it
looks more as if he is part of that national security in attempting
*very poorly" (I ight add) to place a spin on the topic that the US
government does not really know what is going on. BS on that!
@@Womble1252 funny thing is , that all he would have had to have done is watch about a weeks worth of YT greedible documentaries on the subject, and he could have his facts straight.... I've been interested in the subject for 30-ish years... and its all the same stories told over and over that whole time.... and everything since 2017 is just a bunch of BS, worthless info....
This fella is severely underinformed
He is most likely a disinformation agent
He should sit down with richard dolan and have a chat lol, also with some of the people that have had their lives changed by this.
Of course that will never happen. They know what they're doing.
Their not even good at deceit anymore.
Reported for misinformation. 🚩
This guy doesn't know anything about the topic. Even basic well documented things. Crazy he wrote a book, and is doing a speaking tour about something he knows so little about.
His book that sold 1 copy (me, I refunded it, though) that has been championed by random news outlets who coincidentally also never acknowledged David Grusch.
Yet way better books like "In Plain Sight" are never mentioned.
This is not the place to get valid information on this subject. It is disappointing the curators didn’t have the ability to do more research into the presenter. I don’t care if Garret is a ”friend” of the national archives.
Yet we'll probably see popular RUclipsrs with millions of subscribers suddenly parrot Graff's parroted AARO narrative.
This guy never read the FBI document that was made about
the Roswell crash which stated "In the LA case the Army grabbed
it (the disk) and would not let us (the FBI) have it for cursory
examination." Well the LA likely stood for Los Alamos.
However, Wright Patterson Field was (in 1947) the home
of the ATIC or Air Technical Intelligence Center were any
foreign rockets, craft, or debris were taken for study. Mr.
Graff has either not done his homework or simply wanted
to give a pedestrian (official US government cleared) POV
on a subject certain people would like to see go away.
He gets his data from the National Enquirer
Dont forget skin walker ranch
Congress saod roswell was real
dude is waffling false info.
Thank you for hosting this incredible conversation.
Yes, it's incredibly dishonest.
Test for sb
seriously...
Hand raised