@ElChivo 105 In real life, most air to air combat is done outside the pilots visual range, so a good jet, with superior radar, targeting, weapons etc is more important than the pilot, this aint ww2 anymore
@@ThePuma1707 True, but Star Wars is like WWII. So using WWII fighter planes for comparison does work, so in this case an ace pilot in an unshielded TIE interceptor will win 9 times out of ten against a noob pilot in a shielded X-wing
@@XCalibur_EX they used Greebles from WW2 model kits to decorate their models, but they didnt just build the things out of model kits. The real reason why it's so similar to WW2 dogfights is because they literally took historical footage of ww2 dogfights and superimposed their models over the planes to get the movement right
This Cg short was something Star Wars always needed! Showing Empire perspective is what we wanted and it shows us that rebels could be bad guys as well! Very nice Reaction 👍
See people are forgetting, these aren't the rebels, they're the New Republic now. They're a big government just like Empire and governments are bound to become corrupt.
@Casanova Frankenstein I said that rebels are Bad Guys from the Empire's perspective! Of course each side have different perspectives! In this Cg short, we are in the perspective of an imperial pilot and it change absolutely everything we saw in the past! So yes in this Cg short New Republic are the Bad Guy because we see it like an imperial.
@Casanova Frankenstein The point is that there are no bad guys or good guys, a good story would show you that there are good people on both sides, and that good people will still do bad things. These are soldiers, this isn't a battle between light and dark, these are people, with families, fighting to survive a war.
@@StopReadingMyNameOrElse Rogue Squadron wasn't a combat sim, it was more of an action arcade title. I never referred to that series in my post, dunno where you pulled that from. Also, 3rd person camera in the XW/TF/XWA games were available but you couldn't really play from those perspectives...they were mainly there to use when viewing replays. There were no HUD elements available in those camera angles so you'd have no situational awareness of your systems, enemy locations, etc.
@@StopReadingMyNameOrElseBecause the developers specifically called out X-Wing/Tie Fighter/etc as previous games they referenced and pulled gameplay mechanics from. The Rogue Squadron games played nothing like them. Anyone who has played the two types of games know they don't play the same and wouldn't have any confusion between the two. For example, there is no energy management in Rogue Squadron, but the balancing energy between engines/weapons/shields being used in Squadrons have always been in XW/TF/XvT/XWA games. Even the UI that Squadrons uses looks nearly the same as the older titles. Even the development studios were completely different...XW/TF/XvT/XWA were Totally Games, Rogue Squadron games were done by Factor Five. The XW/TF/XWA games instantly should come to mind as SW combat sims and some of the best games ever if you played PC games in the 90s.
@@StopReadingMyNameOrElse I think the fundamental disconnect is that you consider the Rogue Squadron game as an "X-Wing" game, when it has nothing to do with the game series spawned from the original game titled "X-Wing" that came out several years before the first Rogue Squadron ever came out. But any old school Lucasarts fan knows they are very different titles with different focuses. One is meant to be a cockpit sim, the other is more of an arcade action game.
@@StopReadingMyNameOrElse I'm not arguing just to be a contrarion, I'm saying trying to argue Squadrons should have 3rd person view because Rogue Squadron had it like saying a new NBA 2K should have super dunks because NBA Jam had it...they're 2 different NBA games with different focuses and don't play the same way. XW/TF games have a different focus from Rogue Squadron, and the new Squadrons game is trying to be more like those older titles than the later Rogue Squadron games.
To be fair, a lot of the short was inside the cockpit with the pilot. That’s what the game is meant to be like. If you want a 3rd person starfighter game just play starfighter assault on Battlefront 2. Lots of people sleep on it even though it’s good.
@@XCalibur_EX Yes. Because that's bullshit. Their full name is The Alliance to Restore the Republic, the democratic power which many of the alliance leaders where part of before a ruthless dictator came to power and began killing any opposed his regime. Only Saw's partisans and intelligence wetworkers did anything really questionable. But even those unpleasant acts are dwarved in comparison to what's on the Empires ledger. Most famous of which is the destruction of an entire, planet.
I wish they would actually make a full length feature film where we follow the “bad guys” as protagonists and not the same old shit we’ve been getting since the OT...just imagine a Vader movie/show, a Maul movie/show or a Kylo Ren movie/show where we just follow them wrecking havoc throughout the story, no light side or signs of redemption just pure dark side, set the story in a time where these characters are at their most evil...when I say everyone would watch that...I mean literally everyone would watch that.
This CG short proved that I can root for the antagonists as much as the protagonists, but in this one, he fights for survival, being chased by a relentless new republic soldier is scary, just like the terminator, but in space. Make this into a full fledged movie!!! I pay credits to see it on the big screen.
Technically the tie pilot would the protagonist in this short, the Empire as a whole wasn't involved with the Sith, they just want to bring peace and order to the galaxy, the imperials are still people, with families, loved ones, children, not all of them are bad guy. And not all Rebels were good guys, alot of them were criminals: smugglers, cheaters, murderers, terrorists.
So the game is basically supposed to be like a star wars combat flight simulator. It sticks you in the cockpit of ships. You have no Gameplay HUD per say, but rely on your ships instruments in front of you, inside the cockpit. Hence, no third person.
If they added 3rd person then they'd have to be separated from 1st person players to keep things fair. Maybe they'll add 3rd person modes later on. 9:30 Also the CG short *wasn't* in third person! It was *cinematic* . That's like *calling movies third person* . That's not them marketing it as third person.
Because it's nothing more than Star Wars porn? Its easy to make badass action scenes that only take place less than 10 minutes in these shorts. It's not as easy creating a 2 hour movie with a ton of shit that can never be explored in these shorts.
Actually, 3rd person is not immersive at all. Especially in a game that is "putting you in th erole of a fighter pilot". Not being able to completely see everything around you adds to the tension of being in a life/death situation. This game is not for everyone. It's for the hardcore space simulation gamers out there. It's a niche title that's for the gamers who play *_Star Citizen_* , *_Elite Dangerous_***, **_*X-Wing_* , *_Tie-Fighter_* , *_X-Wing vs Tie-Fighter_* , *_Wing Commander_* , etc.. Which is why it's only $40.00 USD. There isn't a huge market out there so it's not coming in at $60.00/$70.00. Another interesting note is that there aren't 50 different versions being released. Just one version. There are some pre-release purchase cosmetic incentives but thats it. You really can't compare a *CINEMATIC* trailer to a gameplay mechanic. That's a bit unfair. When you go to see a movie (cinematic), you're behind what's going on becuse they want your undivide attention to what they're showing you. You're not in the movie yourself. Same thing with trailers such as this. They want to hype you and tell a tale *ABOUT* the game you're hopefully going to play. But the game itself, they want you to rely solely on your ships instruments and what you can immediately see to inform your decisions. 3rd person view will *NEVER* be able to give that type of exoerience. Personally, I can't wait.
As a VR Elite Dangerous player I completely agree with your analysis. You'd never have the same level of immersive control over your ship in 3rd person.
There's no precise control in 3rd person. This isn't an arcade shooter, this will be a space sim. I'm not saying space sim or arcade is better (both can be fun), but we didn't have a Star Wars space sim for 20 years.
I'm team 1st Person because I like the Flight Simulator aspect of it. I like having to pay attention to the instruments in the cockpit rather than have a HUD delegate that information to the corners of the screen. My only real gripe with Squadrons is I've just gotten bored of the Age of the Empire. But I don't have to worry about that too much since we get the High Republic in January.
I've preordered the game, and for this I'm team 1st person. I can't wait to see how this game does. I hope it sells well. it reminds me of x wing and tie fighter from the 90s
I am gonna get this just because it’s Star Wars and wanna enjoy a new story, but totally agree with Joe about it needs to be 3rd person especially with the personalisation of ships etc.
I think the reason they only have 1st person is because it supposed to be very competitive and with third person, like in many third person games you can abuse it and use it as an unfair advantage
The 3rd person bias comes from console games due to how your (console gamers) Star Wars games have been done so far. From a PC gamer's perspective having played X-Wing, TIE Fighter, X-wing vs TIE FIghter and X-Wing Alliance - these games are space simulators from the pilot's perspective. The Pilot's perspective is sitting in the cockpit looking out. Having played the entire legacy of Squadrons I am so excited for this - I even have w/c 5th October off work so I can hammer the game from Friday night for a solid week+
This BAAAAANNGGGEDDDD!!!! This energy was SWTOR level. Let’s goo! As for the game, this is like Wip3out, why no 3rd person view? Wip3out had different views you could switch during flight so you choose whichever view your comfortable in. That’s my only issue so far.
This isn't supposed to be like Wipeout, it's supposed to be more like the old school X-Wing/TIE Fighter/XWA games, which were more like combat sims and cockpit view only.
Nice video, I enjoyed seeing your reactions to what is an awesome short. On the subject of 3rd person, I'm not against 3rd person being available, but as this is ment to be more in the vein of the original X-wing Vs Tie Fighter sim based game, non-cockpit views should not hav any type of HUD, so playing out of the cockpit would be near imposable as it was in the old games. Don't get me wrong, 3rd person arcade games are fun, but it's been what near 20 years from when we last had the treat of a Star Wars flight sim title that has more depth to the flight mechanics, power managment etc For me I'm alabout the VR and can't wait to jump into the game, the story mode and the online multi-player, but to be fair I would love to see 3rd person views for VR and non-VR players but just for the cool views that it would offer, so no hud in gameplay is something I'm looking forward to, as that in VR is what will be the closest to making one of my childhood dreams come true of getting into the piolt seat of these machines. As for the ciamatic telling of the story in the game, what ever perspective is cool with me and if it is anywhere near the quality and class of this short then we are all in for a treat!
The cg short is just like a mini cinematic. It has nothing to do with wether the game would be a 3rd person or first person. This is supposed to be a simulator. Adding a 3rd person option wouldn't make any sense. Lol
I think the first-person perspective is forced in order to compensate for VR players. If people were given the option to be able to go into third-person perspective, they'll likely get the upper hand with the wider field of view. That's just my guess. I'm mostly excited to try this one out in VR myself.
Not to say that trying to switch between the 2 views, with how complex & engaged it'll be to play, it'd take away a critical part of the game and tear a hole in the skill ceiling by saying, hey don't check your instruments, just cheat & look behind you whilst flying straight. That shits repetitive & would remo e so much, so I'm glad its a 1st person only
@@waristheraputic Yeah, definitely. Third-person experiences are great in a lot of games but when it comes to multiplayer it can easily be problematic in that sense. Although nothing is really stopping devs from removing the ability to move the camera around freely in third person. Other issues may be impossible to overcome.
This isn't Rogue Squadron, 3rd person in those x-wing simulators were basically novelties that no one actually used when dogfighting. You make it third person you have to start taking away a lot of the aspects that build upon what made the X-wing, TIE, and X-Wing vs TIE games so special.
@@gcools6831 I'm gonna be blasting the Imperial theme whole I play this game while calling the enemy team rebel scum the entire game xD. I just don't pull one over us again make us join the rebels or some shit again.
They should add 3rd person like in flight sims just to see third person. If anyone has played a sim in third person it’s impossible to fly cause of no hud and no retical etc. 3rd person should be for only seeing views.
Weird how theyre making out the Empire to be the good guys in this trailer. Yes, I understand they are playing with the idea of seeing the war from both sides, but the Empire are basically Space Nazis. People who are pro Empire are always a bit suspect to me.
think of it like this the rebels are the terrorists and the empire is america and the death star blowing up was basically their 9/11 and the jedi are religious zealots who kidnap kids into their cult... technically all true from a certain point of view
But the Empire did actually brought peace to the galaxy, through force, but peace. A lot of worlds are pro-empire for a reason. There are good and bad on both sides, example, Saw Guerrera and his extremists.
The actual lore isn't black and white like the movies. The star wars mmorpg plays around with it a bit. A shame they didn't do anything with Finn being ex empire in the new SW movies.
btt1216 hundreds of thousands of storm troopers were killed they were soldiers serving their government that were fighting against terrorists and worlds that were secretly funding and providing weapons to terrorists alderran said they were peaceful planet but they were going behind the back of the government to arm terrorist and help coordinate attacks on military installations
the most durable interceptor ever
@ElChivo 105that's not true. In real life, superior plane matters a lot in an air to air fight.
@ElChivo 105 In real life, most air to air combat is done outside the pilots visual range, so a good jet, with superior radar, targeting, weapons etc is more important than the pilot, this aint ww2 anymore
@@ThePuma1707 True, but Star Wars is like WWII. So using WWII fighter planes for comparison does work, so in this case an ace pilot in an unshielded TIE interceptor will win 9 times out of ten against a noob pilot in a shielded X-wing
@@sharko4093 not to mention they used WWII model pieces to make the models for the original trilogy
@@XCalibur_EX they used Greebles from WW2 model kits to decorate their models, but they didnt just build the things out of model kits. The real reason why it's so similar to WW2 dogfights is because they literally took historical footage of ww2 dogfights and superimposed their models over the planes to get the movement right
This Cg short was something Star Wars always needed! Showing Empire perspective is what we wanted and it shows us that rebels could be bad guys as well! Very nice Reaction 👍
See people are forgetting, these aren't the rebels, they're the New Republic now. They're a big government just like Empire and governments are bound to become corrupt.
Rocket Starplayer Don’t think those are Rebels any longer but your point is completely valid!
@@KanekiKen-fc3qo exaclty, you're totally right
@Casanova Frankenstein I said that rebels are Bad Guys from the Empire's perspective! Of course each side have different perspectives! In this Cg short, we are in the perspective of an imperial pilot and it change absolutely everything we saw in the past! So yes in this Cg short New Republic are the Bad Guy because we see it like an imperial.
@Casanova Frankenstein The point is that there are no bad guys or good guys, a good story would show you that there are good people on both sides, and that good people will still do bad things. These are soldiers, this isn't a battle between light and dark, these are people, with families, fighting to survive a war.
3:07 I understand the "crutch" that is 3rd person yes. We'll all be on a level playing field finally. Cockpit view always!
Yeah, it's supposed to be more like the old school X-Wing/TIE Fighter/XWA games, which were more like combat sims and cockpit view only.
@@StopReadingMyNameOrElse Rogue Squadron wasn't a combat sim, it was more of an action arcade title. I never referred to that series in my post, dunno where you pulled that from. Also, 3rd person camera in the XW/TF/XWA games were available but you couldn't really play from those perspectives...they were mainly there to use when viewing replays. There were no HUD elements available in those camera angles so you'd have no situational awareness of your systems, enemy locations, etc.
@@StopReadingMyNameOrElseBecause the developers specifically called out X-Wing/Tie Fighter/etc as previous games they referenced and pulled gameplay mechanics from. The Rogue Squadron games played nothing like them. Anyone who has played the two types of games know they don't play the same and wouldn't have any confusion between the two.
For example, there is no energy management in Rogue Squadron, but the balancing energy between engines/weapons/shields being used in Squadrons have always been in XW/TF/XvT/XWA games. Even the UI that Squadrons uses looks nearly the same as the older titles.
Even the development studios were completely different...XW/TF/XvT/XWA were Totally Games, Rogue Squadron games were done by Factor Five.
The XW/TF/XWA games instantly should come to mind as SW combat sims and some of the best games ever if you played PC games in the 90s.
@@StopReadingMyNameOrElse I think the fundamental disconnect is that you consider the Rogue Squadron game as an "X-Wing" game, when it has nothing to do with the game series spawned from the original game titled "X-Wing" that came out several years before the first Rogue Squadron ever came out. But any old school Lucasarts fan knows they are very different titles with different focuses. One is meant to be a cockpit sim, the other is more of an arcade action game.
@@StopReadingMyNameOrElse I'm not arguing just to be a contrarion, I'm saying trying to argue Squadrons should have 3rd person view because Rogue Squadron had it like saying a new NBA 2K should have super dunks because NBA Jam had it...they're 2 different NBA games with different focuses and don't play the same way. XW/TF games have a different focus from Rogue Squadron, and the new Squadrons game is trying to be more like those older titles than the later Rogue Squadron games.
There's no third person because it's a simulator, everything you need to know is in the cockpit in terms of UI. Plus they have to balance it.
To be fair, a lot of the short was inside the cockpit with the pilot. That’s what the game is meant to be like. If you want a 3rd person starfighter game just play starfighter assault on Battlefront 2. Lots of people sleep on it even though it’s good.
Seeing the bad guys win/being the last one alive is so much more appealing. This video is what we need. Tired of the republic winning.
Palpatine wins in the end, so you're good.
The republic ties at best most of the time
Your tired of seeing the war crime committing oppressive fascist's loose?
@@Avenger85438 You want to keep seeing the war crime committing terroristic underdogs win?
@@XCalibur_EX Yes. Because that's bullshit. Their full name is The Alliance to Restore the Republic, the democratic power which many of the alliance leaders where part of before a ruthless dictator came to power and began killing any opposed his regime.
Only Saw's partisans and intelligence wetworkers did anything really questionable. But even those unpleasant acts are dwarved in comparison to what's on the Empires ledger. Most famous of which is the destruction of an entire, planet.
I wish they would actually make a full length feature film where we follow the “bad guys” as protagonists and not the same old shit we’ve been getting since the OT...just imagine a Vader movie/show, a Maul movie/show or a Kylo Ren movie/show where we just follow them wrecking havoc throughout the story, no light side or signs of redemption just pure dark side, set the story in a time where these characters are at their most evil...when I say everyone would watch that...I mean literally everyone would watch that.
I agree but I’d rather have a show as well as a game about the empire in between RotJ and the battle of jakku
Empire isn't actually the bad guys. Empire = USA. Rebels = ISIS.
@@thatnerdwholikesstarwars5258 The Battlefront II campaign took place in that timeframe, and it followed the Empire/First Order
Josh Evans ya but that sucked
So I want more lol
Give us a series following thrawn.
There is no third person in-game. It's entirely and only a first person cockpit view.
Shit, last time I was this early Sam and Raven were refusing to acknowledge that Joe was missing.
Its a SIM based on the old Star Wars X Wing and TIE Fighter games. That's why it's not in 3rd person.
This CG short proved that I can root for the antagonists as much as the protagonists, but in this one, he fights for survival, being chased by a relentless new republic soldier is scary, just like the terminator, but in space. Make this into a full fledged movie!!! I pay credits to see it on the big screen.
Technically the tie pilot would the protagonist in this short, the Empire as a whole wasn't involved with the Sith, they just want to bring peace and order to the galaxy, the imperials are still people, with families, loved ones, children, not all of them are bad guy. And not all Rebels were good guys, alot of them were criminals: smugglers, cheaters, murderers, terrorists.
So the game is basically supposed to be like a star wars combat flight simulator. It sticks you in the cockpit of ships. You have no Gameplay HUD per say, but rely on your ships instruments in front of you, inside the cockpit. Hence, no third person.
If they added 3rd person then they'd have to be separated from 1st person players to keep things fair. Maybe they'll add 3rd person modes later on.
9:30 Also the CG short *wasn't* in third person! It was *cinematic* . That's like *calling movies third person* .
That's not them marketing it as third person.
3rd person is for children. Real pilots sit in the seat not outside. Same with racing.
The first person aspect is the most exciting part to me as a VR gamer
Can anyone tell me why these Star Wars games and shows are so much better than most of the movies
Because people spend more years developing them than your regular SW movie.
@@C-F98 Again that is absurd. The movies are supposed to be the backbone of the franchise. It should be the other way around. But I do get that.
Because Kathleen Kennedy had nothing to do with these
@@joshevans8206 Truth lol
Because it's nothing more than Star Wars porn? Its easy to make badass action scenes that only take place less than 10 minutes in these shorts.
It's not as easy creating a 2 hour movie with a ton of shit that can never be explored in these shorts.
Actually, 3rd person is not immersive at all. Especially in a game that is "putting you in th erole of a fighter pilot". Not being able to completely see everything around you adds to the tension of being in a life/death situation. This game is not for everyone. It's for the hardcore space simulation gamers out there. It's a niche title that's for the gamers who play *_Star Citizen_* , *_Elite Dangerous_***, **_*X-Wing_* , *_Tie-Fighter_* , *_X-Wing vs Tie-Fighter_* , *_Wing Commander_* , etc.. Which is why it's only $40.00 USD. There isn't a huge market out there so it's not coming in at $60.00/$70.00.
Another interesting note is that there aren't 50 different versions being released. Just one version. There are some pre-release purchase cosmetic incentives but thats it. You really can't compare a *CINEMATIC* trailer to a gameplay mechanic. That's a bit unfair. When you go to see a movie (cinematic), you're behind what's going on becuse they want your undivide attention to what they're showing you. You're not in the movie yourself. Same thing with trailers such as this. They want to hype you and tell a tale *ABOUT* the game you're hopefully going to play. But the game itself, they want you to rely solely on your ships instruments and what you can immediately see to inform your decisions. 3rd person view will *NEVER* be able to give that type of exoerience. Personally, I can't wait.
As a VR Elite Dangerous player I completely agree with your analysis. You'd never have the same level of immersive control over your ship in 3rd person.
This is one of the best things I've ever seen
There's no precise control in 3rd person. This isn't an arcade shooter, this will be a space sim. I'm not saying space sim or arcade is better (both can be fun), but we didn't have a Star Wars space sim for 20 years.
I'm team 1st Person because I like the Flight Simulator aspect of it. I like having to pay attention to the instruments in the cockpit rather than have a HUD delegate that information to the corners of the screen. My only real gripe with Squadrons is I've just gotten bored of the Age of the Empire. But I don't have to worry about that too much since we get the High Republic in January.
I've preordered the game, and for this I'm team 1st person. I can't wait to see how this game does. I hope it sells well. it reminds me of x wing and tie fighter from the 90s
I really like the first person view even not in vr. But in games I’m always forced to use third because it’s better generally.
Im def picking the game up $35-$40 why not
I am gonna get this just because it’s Star Wars and wanna enjoy a new story, but totally agree with Joe about it needs to be 3rd person especially with the personalisation of ships etc.
The Game is ment to be FirstPerson its so much better this way.
Thats the only way youre gonna feel like a real Pilot.
I think the reason they only have 1st person is because it supposed to be very competitive and with third person, like in many third person games you can abuse it and use it as an unfair advantage
The 3rd person bias comes from console games due to how your (console gamers) Star Wars games have been done so far. From a PC gamer's perspective having played X-Wing, TIE Fighter, X-wing vs TIE FIghter and X-Wing Alliance - these games are space simulators from the pilot's perspective. The Pilot's perspective is sitting in the cockpit looking out. Having played the entire legacy of Squadrons I am so excited for this - I even have w/c 5th October off work so I can hammer the game from Friday night for a solid week+
This BAAAAANNGGGEDDDD!!!! This energy was SWTOR level. Let’s goo! As for the game, this is like Wip3out, why no 3rd person view? Wip3out had different views you could switch during flight so you choose whichever view your comfortable in. That’s my only issue so far.
Because it wouldn't be fair.
This isn't supposed to be like Wipeout, it's supposed to be more like the old school X-Wing/TIE Fighter/XWA games, which were more like combat sims and cockpit view only.
Why can't Lucas Arts make CGI movies like this and those old Republic cinematics?
I’m glad to play the villain in a Star Wars games the last one I did play was when Vader had the apprentice
Always been a 3rd person gamer. Just something about it I love! Respect to the 1st person experience. It's fun but....
3rd person is for children. Real pilots sit in the seat, not outside. Same with racing.
Sheesh....that was peak piloting...lol
Nice video, I enjoyed seeing your reactions to what is an awesome short. On the subject of 3rd person, I'm not against 3rd person being available, but as this is ment to be more in the vein of the original X-wing Vs Tie Fighter sim based game, non-cockpit views should not hav any type of HUD, so playing out of the cockpit would be near imposable as it was in the old games.
Don't get me wrong, 3rd person arcade games are fun, but it's been what near 20 years from when we last had the treat of a Star Wars flight sim title that has more depth to the flight mechanics, power managment etc
For me I'm alabout the VR and can't wait to jump into the game, the story mode and the online multi-player, but to be fair I would love to see 3rd person views for VR and non-VR players but just for the cool views that it would offer, so no hud in gameplay is something I'm looking forward to, as that in VR is what will be the closest to making one of my childhood dreams come true of getting into the piolt seat of these machines. As for the ciamatic telling of the story in the game, what ever perspective is cool with me and if it is anywhere near the quality and class of this short then we are all in for a treat!
The cg short is just like a mini cinematic. It has nothing to do with wether the game would be a 3rd person or first person. This is supposed to be a simulator. Adding a 3rd person option wouldn't make any sense. Lol
I think the first-person perspective is forced in order to compensate for VR players. If people were given the option to be able to go into third-person perspective, they'll likely get the upper hand with the wider field of view. That's just my guess. I'm mostly excited to try this one out in VR myself.
Not to say that trying to switch between the 2 views, with how complex & engaged it'll be to play, it'd take away a critical part of the game and tear a hole in the skill ceiling by saying, hey don't check your instruments, just cheat & look behind you whilst flying straight. That shits repetitive & would remo e so much, so I'm glad its a 1st person only
@@waristheraputic Yeah, definitely. Third-person experiences are great in a lot of games but when it comes to multiplayer it can easily be problematic in that sense. Although nothing is really stopping devs from removing the ability to move the camera around freely in third person. Other issues may be impossible to overcome.
3rd person is for children. Real pilots sit in the seat not outside. Same with racing.
@@sqlevolicious Well that's one way to look at it I suppose lol
6:37 oh that feelin tho
I'm gonna be all over this 👌🔥🔥
The game looks awesome and I am excited to play it. However, I am going to wait and see what the first round of squadrons go through before I jump in.
Team both. But I have psvr and hotas so I'm definitely in. I hear good reports only the flatscreen too, it might surprise you man. 😁
You do play as that empire pilot in the story mode
Not him specifically. He's the leader of Titan Squadron, the player is just a member. You can see him talking to the player in the gameplay reveal.
@@_KayWoah You're actually right, thanks for the correction!
@@JRDNCAT No worries!
This isn't Rogue Squadron, 3rd person in those x-wing simulators were basically novelties that no one actually used when dogfighting. You make it third person you have to start taking away a lot of the aspects that build upon what made the X-wing, TIE, and X-Wing vs TIE games so special.
Wondering when this was coming out
You will all fear the Dork Side 🤬
I’m definitely on the empire side
Same, I'm so happy The Empire are finally getting some spotlight. Tired of them looking like idiots who always lose.
Kaneki Ken Exactly, dude when I saw him take out that X-Wing with the Imperial theme playing in the background with a heroic tone I was like Hell yah
@@gcools6831 I'm gonna be blasting the Imperial theme whole I play this game while calling the enemy team rebel scum the entire game xD. I just don't pull one over us again make us join the rebels or some shit again.
It’s first person only.
CIA thing. They putted USA vs Japan if you still didnt get it
Theres no importance too 3rd person
Bro...calm yo ass down you get a FULL VR cockpit In this game. You don't get to watch the pilot. You are the pilot.
I don't wanna be an ewok
DISCLAIMER!!!!!!!
Battlefront 2's space battles are third person. If this game is strictly first-person, lowkey might have to pass on it.
Day 1
Yub yub
Wtf its like video game
i really dont get why these 3rd person types are so fanatical about it... its like they are in a cult or something.
They should add 3rd person like in flight sims just to see third person. If anyone has played a sim in third person it’s impossible to fly cause of no hud and no retical etc. 3rd person should be for only seeing views.
Weird how theyre making out the Empire to be the good guys in this trailer. Yes, I understand they are playing with the idea of seeing the war from both sides, but the Empire are basically Space Nazis. People who are pro Empire are always a bit suspect to me.
think of it like this the rebels are the terrorists and the empire is america and the death star blowing up was basically their 9/11 and the jedi are religious zealots who kidnap kids into their cult...
technically all true from a certain point of view
But the Empire did actually brought peace to the galaxy, through force, but peace. A lot of worlds are pro-empire for a reason.
There are good and bad on both sides, example, Saw Guerrera and his extremists.
The actual lore isn't black and white like the movies. The star wars mmorpg plays around with it a bit. A shame they didn't do anything with Finn being ex empire in the new SW movies.
@@deathking1019 did you really just compare the destruction of the death star to 9/11? Wow...talk about ass backwards thinking.
btt1216 hundreds of thousands of storm troopers were killed they were soldiers serving their government that were fighting against terrorists and worlds that were secretly funding and providing weapons to terrorists
alderran said they were peaceful planet but they were going behind the back of the government to arm terrorist and help coordinate attacks on military installations
I always just skip to the reaction.
if there is no 3rd person, im not getting it. Tired of all the 1st person