Consciousness is something different from the mind. Descartez said, " I think, therefore I am " but the truth is, " I am, therefore I think " consciousness is the substratum of the mind and since the intelligence needs the data the senses send to the mind in order for it to function as that which tells us on how to proceed with proper action it rest on the mind. Being that both the mind and intelligence are dependent on consciousness for them to function as subtle factors that serve the self to fulfill it's desire for sense gratification the conscious self underlies both the physical and psychic as being the essence that they flow on or from. Consciousness is the essence of the material existence, being so nothing underlies it thus it is the ground substance of reality itself.
I also would love to hear a whole episode on synchronicities, visions, etc. I would like to hear the believers and also the skeptical rebuttals as well.
There are no "skeptical rebuttals". There are just three things in such categories: 1 Pure rubbish that Parapsychologists who don't understand what is good for them and their subject pick up (such as "previous lives" schiezofrenic nonsense) 2 Things that are highly controversial yet can't be rebuffed empirically only philosophically example: Two married people loosed their memory of what happened with them during car ride. They have gone to parapsychologist who hypnotized them and they reported supposedly remembering "woollightie effect" being abducted by Aliens. Now you may denounce it on logical grounds that Aliens aren't visiting Earth that it looks more like "Saint Teresas" hallucinations, Aliens can't be humanoid it's rubbish and so on. I sympathize with such rebuttal. But! I You cannot entirely reject fact that something odd happened to their minds something that has nothing to do with hypnosis. While Aliens and UFOs from different planets are rubbish you cannot empirically reject possibilty of existence of some spiritual realm that may look in our XXI cultural circle look like Aliens and UFOs. That's I think the stance of His Holiness Dalailama and that was stance of Jung on UFOs. I don't believe it I just want to make things methodologically clear. II You cannot rationally draw from it conclusions "that's how most peoples memory work" because we only begin to understand human genetic diversity and genetics of cognitive functions that may be very different even in individuals from the same population. And Stuart Hameroff and Anirban Bandyopadhay actually had build quite a strong case for "almost flawless memory" in people who are not suffering from trauma or mental illnesses. Psychological tools are far from perfect especially if created in order to support some top down assumption or ideology. 3 Remote viewing, Synchronicities and Telepathy: These things thankfully don't rely as much on human senses or memory as spiritual visions or reincarnations therefore should not be put together with them. And so: I Unless you believe that you are a Boltzmann Brain you can't deny that multiple experiments by various reaserchers were conducted on Telepathy or Remote viewing and although most of them can't be easily replicated they are conducted with high rigor and score higher statical significance that most discoveries in for example Genetics(field no one sane questions). II Because we don't really understand Quantum and so far it looks like Counsciosness and Quantum clearly Non-local Physics can be somehow corelated you cannot claim impossibility of such phenomena. Moreover as Sabine Hossenfelder pointed out in recent video Multiverse Hypothesis deserves being branded at least as pseudoscientific as psychic phenomena has reputation. III Quantum Biology is now a fact couple decades ago birds Magnetoreception was viewed as "pseudoscience" now is established fact. Rupert Sheldrake experiment was replicated even by skeptics!(watch TOE interview). And Orch Or Theory is likely needed to explain even as simple things in Brains as faptic transmission or Psychodelics activity (this doesn't mean I say Psychodelics are good on the contrary! We just need Psychodelics to be opposite of Anesthesia if Physicalism has to hold up in any form and Orch Or is the only Physicalist Theory that does it)!. IV The final countragument against psychic phenomena: "Why is it so weak"? -Well, depends what you mean by "weak". Gravity is also a "pretty weak phenomenon". Haha. In dogs and birds (that have higher body temperature than we have it isn't "weak"). But Sheldrake experiment is unpopular because usually people who believe in Psi think it gives some support for human uniqueness or Dualism, occultism wherever. And read please Stanisław Lems "Lymphaters Formula"("The Truth" tom by MIT Press) if you are curious why Psi looks "so weak" in humans if it's so fundamental to the Universe. It's pretty consistent with latest developments in Orch Or Theory, Quantum Physics (this year Nobel Prize), Bird Navigation and avoids mysticism.
4:04 we clearly know that our Consciousness is also shaped formed embedded within culture and so language and the symbols that we share begin to construct certain moldels of what is possible.
Everything was fine until she brought up "the sacred" and continued to provide what she clearly thought was a related anecdote about having visualized an omega on a college campus, which is the most likely place to see an omega in the west, whether it's a feature of a building or a symbol in academic literature.
how about this? Consciousness is memory. Memory is recorded in neurons. Movies are recorded in series of still picture frame, it becomes alive when it is run fast enough to become seamless. When we recall an past event, we are viewing a series of pics. When we think forward, we create new pics, new neurons connections, new outcomes, and new movies.
Marilyn Schlitz raises important points - attention and intention, culture accounting for possibilities, etc - but what are the principles within which they can be categorized? The semiotic theory of Charles Sanders Peirce, the Dasein of Martin Heidegger, provide signposts to this end. Heidegger strikes a particular chord with me because his Dasein points to "knowing how to be" as a fundamental that is applicable to all life (Schlitz's references to culture relate). Every creature enters the world in innocence and learns "how to be" from the contexts that it encounters. Indeed, I've a hunch that "knowing how to be" might provide a new slant on the weird goings-on in QM physics. Cube root reduction liberates subatomic particles from their Newtonian constraints, and the contexts in which they find themselves impose the constraints that define their options, "behavior", and ultimately their properties. Notice that in all of the above examples, from culture to subatomic, primary direction of causation is top down. Bottom-up constrains what the top-down can command.
« There is so much more! » Good summary. Thinking we are a bunch of meat is clearly an illusion. What she said (especially about indigenous people, and not « primitive » as Robert says) reminds me a phrase I like : « we must not see to believe but we must believe to see » (it’s may be not well translated, I am not English native speaker)
The consistency of heaven experience, if heaven exist it should accessible like our world, even it has different places and uniqueness , but every person in it should can meet in interaction and witnessing same common thing, like 2 person that dies, have same surrounding information about operating room condition, they meet each other in heaven , have a conversation, seeing same place, and both back to life and tell us about their same nde. Like tuning on 88 fm and we will hear the same broadcast music.
Consciousness is the level which engages in the world, and is capable of responding both to external and internal impulses. Having no impulses from itself and being primarily a mechanism for inducing response, it can be very wrong.
Conscious can be understood by looking in not out ! What you look out is' what you want to look' depend on your personalty,culture,belief system! When you look in you are unbiased and you will learn more about your unexpressed hidden Consciousness and if you are dedicated & Sincere then may be Subconscious too !
This series arnt serious Science. Most important show up this series are popular Science more interesting in subcribes Iol. Science honest how figuret it out are nill.
The absolute is impossible ( concerning infinity). What we call nature emanates from ever-changing, purely abstract patterns in flux. Change is fundamental. It underlies everything. No changes ( brain activity), no consciousness ! Consciousness is essentially about process.
Consciousness is That which is aware of thoughts, feelings, perceptions, sensations etc but in itself it is none of those things. It is borderless, limitless, transparent Being....the true nature of everything that exists. It is the real " I Am" within each of us!
@@cosminvisan520 First of all, to each their own opinion, so please respect theirs. Because when you write "lolz", it means it's funny and therefore, that imply a degree of judgement. Now, I would rather say that all of those things, except thought, are sensory operators, not consciousness. Let's say that it need them to be "in use" and, in that process, to be able to experiment and interact with the external universe. It's like a measurement unit, you can have a meter, but it needs an actual object to measure in order to find a context otherwise, that unit by its own means nothing. A meter of what exactly? But, just because both the object and the measurement unit goes hand in hand, it doesn't mean that the unit itself haven't existed prior to have the object. No, that construct already existed before as an abstract convention. Also, regarding operators, if a feeling is consciousness, it would simply mean that if you are not experiencing any emotion in a particular moment, you don't exist, which would be impossible. So, operators and consciousness are two separate things, even if they operates together.
@@cosminvisan520 of course it's not an opinion, it's a fact. I never said otherwise. And you shouldn't accuse me of doing something I didn't do just based on your _opiniob_ about me. At least, if you have an actual constructive criticism against what I said, explain it like an adult and not act like a judgemental child.
@@cosminvisan520 Well, you are obviously either in denial or you didn't understand what I meant, might be because English is only my third language, I don't know... Anyway, since there is no openess, the case is closed on my side. No hard feeling buddy.
@@cosminvisan520 You know nothing about my personal life, so again, you are making false assumption about me because you have nothing contructive to say. Btw, I did read my first comment and the opinion was not about science, but rather related to the author of this comment, there goes another misinterpretation... I'm being nice in my comment, you on the other hand only speak for the sake criticising, acting like a child. Sorry if you didn't received your lolly today! In other words, you are the one with resentment and that emotion only affect you, at least not me. And since it's physically impossible for me to feel _your_ emotion for _you_ , you're gonna have to feel it by yourself. So, sorry in advance for the pain you're gonna have to experience as anger is no pleasurable emotion to experience. You must have been hurt in the past where you felt powerless and are now seeking power elsewhere by attacking some random people. I don't know your story but I know it's not right to attack others. Just deal with your past hurt, have a good cry if need be, then come back and have an open discussion between two adult. Because now I'm probably dealing with a hurt little child inside an adult body right now. See, our body can age, but emotion isn't gouverned by time, so it's time to let go of your hurt child in you that lives in the past, by feeling the past pain in order to release it from you once and for all.
@@cosminvisan520 it's ok, you don't have to feel your past child pain right now, you have free will! But let me tell you that the longer you wait, the harder it's gonna be to experience it when the laws of the universe leaves you no choice but to feel it.
I have wondered that if Time only exists within this expanding Universe and our brains/mind perceives running Time, then a consciousness may exists outside of Time and some can get pieces to be aware of, making it not some power or rebirth action just a part of normal nature,
I suppose consciousness is the same or universal in all of us, just the content makes it different. Who is the to say that errors in consciousness may be able to spill over, where one can see the content of another.
Talking about consciousness is like talking about muscles. There are very basic principles and laws of how a simple muscle works but then there are many forms, levels and complexity. However for muscles there is a basic or simple theory, the same does not apply to neurons except for a computational description.
I hope no one is offended by this, but if you want to get an idea of what reality is get a job at the county fair cleaning the horse stalls. I like to get my survival gear together & get myself totally lost in the wilderness. After I get over my panic attack I spend a few days trying to find civilization again
The chief problem I see with consciousness is why some people persist in seeing it as a great problerm in the first place. A sign of the times and an issue to be resolved by future psychologists & sociologists. Common sense: to be conscious is to be aware, ie the 5 senses and their interactions. No great mysteries...we share these mental faculties with many other creatures. To ask "what it is like" to be oneself, be conscious, be a bat or whatever are pseudoquestions which try to sharpen a loose & indeterminate linguistic idiom to impossible levels of determinnacy & precision.
No, its certainly not a pseudo question. First there's the problem of personal identity. How do persons persist over space and time ? Isnt that an important question ? Second, there is the hard problem i.e. the nature of the phenomenal experience - is it a property, substance or a process ? Is it generated "by" the brain while being part of it or is it merely causing an interference on something else ? Or is it identical to brain process ? Dont you see why these questions are important ? Atleast medically its important to know when and exactly at what point does a person stop being a person.
Dear Lord you use very big words... pease explain for me in simple terms if consciousness is just awareness are we unconscious when we sleep? If we are unconscious when we sleep why are we able to remember Dreams or even be frightened in those dreams to point of forcing ourselves into a more alert state?? why do we wake up when we're touched or spoken to during sleep but not so when we're anesthetized...and where does consciousness go when we are "knocked out" from a punch or anesthesia
@@leonstenutz6003 I think more research is needed to be able and control these phenomena clinically since some people are interested in having one while others might want to stop them... I did find this video very interesting, on the subject ruclips.net/video/wvvovktKKa4/видео.html
Yeah for sure...the US government has "remote viewers" shhh its a secret though :) Ringo Star was a remote viewer...not only could he willing take his consciousness out of his body...he could direct it to go to specific longitude latitude points
That is the path of the Eastern yogi. But these days that all is dying out. So yes there is a way but it needs a lot of dedication and talent. Not all people are fit for it only a minority. Dont think the Western way of life can do this. Science studies what consciousness is from the outside in! Rings a bell? If you want to know what consciousness is it must, as you say it must also be studied from the inside out. But thats not so easy as you might think.
@@blijebij hi there, again :) ... even though they're foreign to me I do find such self-control practices very fascinating... the pursuit of enlightment/nirvana by Buddha is the only case I know though 😅 from my understanding, what you refer as consciousness I think of as unconscious activity, that which accounts for most of the body functions and which manifests itself only in dreamlike or spiritual experiences such as feelings of extreme sadness-shock/joy-pleasure and the like... such experiences have a different meaning to different people and agreeably, it's not always easy, as you mentioned, to study them from the outside... I don't know the exact role of our body in relation to consciousness but it certainly seems to play a key role...
I've been following this series for years, including RLK's admitted existential 'crisis' about consciousness. He needs to change the tape. He continues to interview guess that add absolutely zero to data that he has already gathered. The channel is actually becoming a con to new viewers. If RLK is in search of 'truth', I suggest new topics.
Thanks. This morning I closed my eyes and visualized 6:10 time digit then I checked if it's the real time. No, it was not; the right time was 6:05 am . However, my house clock on my back wall was exactly running and pointing at 6:10am. According to Bible, consciousness (mind) is only suggested by Lord Jesus Christ (Mt22.37, Mk12.30, Lk10.27), and in Torah Deut 6.5 implies that human general structure holds three portions, the spirit ( נִשְמַת אָדָמ, the godly soul, Prov20.27), the soul ( נֶפֶשׁ הַחַיָּה, the animal soul, Deut 6:5, Gn1.2) and the strength including your body and beings in the surrounding that belong to you or under your control. As mentioned before Reality The Whole is divided into three portions: Planck world, Dirac Sea and House of God by two speed limits, light speed (LS) and dark speed (DS, space expanding speed) which is defined as the speed of a point existence in the closed system (בֹּהוּ, Gn1.2) of the ultimate chaos state (תֹּהוּ, Gn1.2), 3x10^34 m/s ≤ DS < ∞. Take a believer of LORD Jesus Christ as an example, his spirit is connected with God the Holy Spirit, his spirit speed is faster than DS so that his spirit is able to detect his animal soul and makes his animal soul visible in a vision or a dream (e.g. prophets in OT, Number 12.6). In regular the day time when waking up he makes decisions to glorify LORD God or do evil following his consciousness formed by a cooperation of his spirit and animal, and in the night time when sleeping his spirit rests in God the Holy Ghost, under sort of some his animal soul's measurement over his body and his surroundings an imaginary figure of his with specific background is produced for him to perform various actions in a dream which is called his unconscious function.
1:16.... She says...”We are more affected by our Unconscious!?”......A brick would appear Unconscious! Is that affected by its “unconscious”? Surely the logical way to observe (subversive) control over us, is how our “subconscious Subconsciousness” is at the forefront of human priority to Perception!
6:38 You say “Primitive”!? As a de edification Of Intelligence? I have to disagree profusely..... The same “Primitive” Memory that cell structure and replace with continually repair of Organic components have, is a “memory”, just as equal to later more recent born Biological Humans! So Primitive is not a component relative to the conversation.
The indians say 'all is consciousnous'. If that is true, I assume the Soul to be conscious; they claim the jiva( embodied soul) is ultimately atman( without superimposition), atman is Brahman( absolute or Ultimate conscious without qualities) -- perhaps is not like the psycho physical, which is of the brain, mind, subconsciousness -- the interrelation of consciousness and subconsciousness memory/construct -- rather a type of life without construct, or state of purity without superimposition, and rather more like Light; the Soul might be Light. Light is a soundwave in the ether, and is the Ether itself. I consider light to be conscious, as light is life and intelligent. The mere fact alone that we come from the Light denotes a kind of intellect. I exercise consciousness like illumination: illumination allows us to see, but we don't really see what illumination truly is, and that is Light. Consciousness I think hasn't a nature, although all nature is dependent on consciousness; again, light, life, as nothing dead exists. Soul is like the signal, it is more proper to acknowledge the radio is in the signal, than the signal in the radio -- you can move the radio wherever, whereas the signal permeates and is everywheres. Soul is like: a tall building cannot stand by itself, it requires a foundation, this foundation requires the substratum the bedrock. You do not see the bedrock, only the tower. There cannot not be the Soul. You cannot have music without the signal. You cannot have a tower stand without the bedrock substratum. Our bodies and plants etc. Is from the Light. Light is a soundwave in the either, the Ether itself. I question if the Soul is more subtle than the Ether, or perhaps the Ether is something from the Atman; likely the Brahman with qualities is indicating from whence Ether comes. What is the essence of the Soul -- the Indian's say 'netti netti'; they use negation. It's to subtle to define directly from relativity or from superimpostion. What is the essence of consciousness -- I don't believe consciousness has a nature, but all natures depend on consciousness. 'Wherever the Soul is, God is there; wherever God is, the Soul is. 'He who dwells in love, dwells in God, and God in him'
Here is a video posted by a young British former Christian, who stated in the video interview this "something was eating me inside" which happened after watching a few Islamic videos on youtube. Prior to watching Islamic video, he wanted to end his life due to depression. It is miracle how God works through your own consciousness, video posted on YT is: "overcometv Would I Be a Good Muslim? ~ New Muslim"
My kind of Lady - Madam Marilyn Schlitz. Ms Marilyn sees like a chief priest used in royal convocation. Ma'am, I love your mind very much. I am the number 77th who like this interview.
She doesnt knows Nothing about conscieness . First she believes conscieness control reality. It is untrue because conscieness unpredicted reality. Sub consciente are unknown in psicologhy than neuriscience so far . NEVER control reality though conscieness. She mencioned concern conscieness are baseless concept of the reality . Honest and experience Both of them are essencial in Science proceedings. She are so hilarious and ridiculus.
Atheism can not end religion with the foolish question "who created God?" and religion can not end atheism because people live better without a horrible personal religious god. God exists because nothing can be created from nothing. Don't fight reason and follow the logic to the truthful conclusion. An eternal entity is not the same as an eternal sequence of causes and effects. I claim I am God, the eternal entity that the kalam cosmological argument talks about, the argument that has never been debunked simply because atheists reject logic as all kind of fallacies if the conclusion, that eliminates all alternatives except the truth, is that God exists and the horrible personal religious god doesn’t. I want to end religion and i find the opposition of atheists. I have written extensively about the nature of God and if you don't know anything about the first theory on God based on logic and rational thinking is because God is suffering the most severe and devastating censorship in history. I have discovered the nature of God and I can prove it ending the war and religion. Would you be able to reply intelligently addressing my points? I don't know how to talk anymore because humanity don't understand prose or verse, nothing, zero, not a word, like if I spoke in an alien language, like if I didn't speak, like it is impossible to understand eternal silence, like if I didn't exist, like if God didn’t exist, like if God was rubbish. The lives of your innocent children would be saved simply by ending the censorship.
The unconscious does not exist. There is only the conscious. The unconscious can only be perceived as something conscious, therefore it is never what it is. For this reason, our life is not controlled to a large extent by the unconscious, quite the contrary.
Another name for consciousness is the mind. The mind is like a computer processor, CAD and Photoshop all working together to take invisible vibrations and forming visible images for the observer ( AI ) to see and experience life using other senses like hearing, speaking, smelling, tasting, feeling emotions and senses of touch.
@@backwardthoughts1022 Our Creator created HIS AI ( YOU and ME ) to be much more sophisticated than the AI systems HE had his AI build with their human hands from earthen materials.
lolol , its not so easy to make progress with one of the most difficult topics there is out there :)
2 года назад
@Blije Bij Well, it's about rainforest travel and nomenclature, or, scientific vacation and familiar vocabulary. But, some words reach my ears like tiny whistles. Examination should be unique enough for powerful learning, but I think a little common sense should be plausible. Monkeys dance on trees all the time.
She started directly with the regular BS, which is a minor performance, and finished with useless BS, which is pretty boring...🤔🥴 Robert, what the f....k!☹️
Yeah its a good trip and psilocybin is now starting to be used to help depression. It clearly demonstrates how the brain produces consciousness as it's a neurological reaction. Like most psychedelics it works by lowering activity in the default mode network, a region in the brain associated with forming the self and as result dissolves it. You then commonly experience a feeling of oneness with the universe/consciousness/nature. It's a trick, but a very profound trick that can have huge benefits. One downside however is that people can become convinced by idealism. Naming no names Cosmin.
@@Graewulfe *"I would give you 2 Likes for this comment if I could ... one for the comment itself and one for the "naming no names""* ... You stinkin' drug abusers! Out of everything I've done in the past (and that's a lot!) I liked the 70's-version acid the best. Once the chemistry got regulated, it was no longer any fun.
@@johnyharris Psychedelic effects being based on neurological reactions does not demonstrate the brain produces consciousness. How do you think it demonstrates that?
@@johnyharris and are you admitting that consciousness is an interchangeable term with universe and nature when you write "universe/consciousness/nature"? Lol
@@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC They should put the damn stuff in the water supply, micro-dose the population with psilocybin and watch the mental health pandemic disappear 😁
attention is not consciousness, it’s just a part of larger cognitive process , It takes place as part of larger cognitive process, and awareness is the result of consciousness process the present or previous cognitive process, or through self-concept and consciousness type two (it’s a result of process, it’s not consciousness itself). unless they have different definition to awareness. 2:00 they have complete misunderstanding! They mix things up! conscious process is very complicated, it generated concurrently with so-called personal identity… 3:50 they mix things up. 4:10 that has nothing to do with consciousness, self concept is not personal identity, it is just a simulation of self concept. culture! they say whatever they want because no one knows. 6:03 that is kind of patching techniques, teaching so-called philosophy is wasting of time, resources,…etc education is essential but no university can make so-called philosophers or thinkers,… ! education is essential process but ….! 8:00 both consciousness type one and type two are limited to individuals, there is no so called universal consciousness! humans do contact with each other unknowingly, but that has nothing to do with consciousness itself! Hallucinators ! everything is governed by science and only science (nothing would come into existence without science whatsoever ) humans didn’t open the gate of science yet , current technology dazzles many, but humans have not yet climbed even the first step of ladder of science.
they think that this universe built by chance! they even call hidden mind (self concept and consciousness type two ) primitive! what they call primitive is far more advanced than what they think that it’s complicated! nothing came up by chance, started simple then became more complicated doesn’t mean what is behind it is simple! for instance: galaxies start simple (seems simple) then became more complicated does not mean that the system behind it necessarily is simple (that is why they don’t understand what life means) to concise: nothing would come into existence without science (it is the rule), there’s a kind of science machine (has nothing to do with so-called gods or consciousness) so-called life is not only biological entities !
@@aminomar7890 well that's an interesting idea but I don't know that it has nothing to do with consciousness. I don't know what else it would have to do with.
It is a little bit hard to explain but primitive can not build more advanced systems the way they think! This existence is very advanced, it’s possible that existence started simple then became more complicated and advanced but so-called life never started as primitive (they describe part of the features of life only) they don’t differentiate between existence and life ! they think that they are the very thing (the same)!
![Twenty One Pilots - “The Line” (from Arcane Season 2) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/E2Rj2gQAyPA/mqdefault.jpg)
Consciousness is something different from the mind. Descartez said, " I think, therefore I am " but the truth is, " I am, therefore I think " consciousness is the substratum of the mind and since the intelligence needs the data the senses send to the mind in order for it to function as that which tells us on how to proceed with proper action it rest on the mind. Being that both the mind and intelligence are dependent on consciousness for them to function as subtle factors that serve the self to fulfill it's desire for sense gratification the conscious self underlies both the physical and psychic as being the essence that they flow on or from.
Consciousness is the essence of the material existence, being so nothing underlies it thus it is the ground substance of reality itself.
I also would love to hear a whole episode on synchronicities, visions, etc. I would like to hear the believers and also the skeptical rebuttals as well.
Sounds like you need to drop some acid dude. Should give you some visions
@@jeffamos9854 I've done plenty!
There are no "skeptical rebuttals".
There are just three things in such categories:
1 Pure rubbish that Parapsychologists who don't understand what is good for them and their subject pick up (such as "previous lives" schiezofrenic nonsense)
2 Things that are highly controversial yet can't be rebuffed empirically only philosophically example:
Two married people loosed their memory of what happened with them during car ride. They have gone to parapsychologist who hypnotized them and they reported supposedly remembering "woollightie effect" being abducted by Aliens.
Now you may denounce it on logical grounds that Aliens aren't visiting Earth that it looks more like "Saint Teresas" hallucinations, Aliens can't be humanoid it's rubbish and so on.
I sympathize with such rebuttal.
But!
I You cannot entirely reject fact that something odd happened to their minds something that has nothing to do with hypnosis. While Aliens and UFOs from different planets are rubbish you cannot empirically reject possibilty of existence of some spiritual realm that may look in our XXI cultural circle look like Aliens and UFOs.
That's I think the stance of His Holiness Dalailama and that was stance of Jung on UFOs. I don't believe it I just want to make things methodologically clear.
II You cannot rationally draw from it conclusions "that's how most peoples memory work" because we only begin to understand human genetic diversity and genetics of cognitive functions that may be very different even in individuals from the same population. And Stuart Hameroff and Anirban Bandyopadhay actually had build quite a strong case for "almost flawless memory" in people who are not suffering from trauma or mental illnesses.
Psychological tools are far from perfect especially if created in order to support some top down assumption or ideology.
3 Remote viewing, Synchronicities and Telepathy:
These things thankfully don't rely as much on human senses or memory as spiritual visions or reincarnations therefore should not be put together with them.
And so:
I
Unless you believe that you are a Boltzmann Brain you can't deny that multiple experiments by various reaserchers were conducted on Telepathy or Remote viewing and although most of them can't be easily replicated they are conducted with high rigor and score higher statical significance that most discoveries in for example Genetics(field no one sane questions).
II Because we don't really understand Quantum and so far it looks like Counsciosness and Quantum clearly Non-local Physics can be somehow corelated you cannot claim impossibility of such phenomena. Moreover as Sabine Hossenfelder pointed out in recent video Multiverse Hypothesis deserves being branded at least as pseudoscientific as psychic phenomena has reputation.
III Quantum Biology is now a fact couple decades ago birds Magnetoreception was viewed as "pseudoscience" now is established fact.
Rupert Sheldrake experiment was replicated even by skeptics!(watch TOE interview). And Orch Or Theory is likely needed to explain even as simple things in Brains as faptic transmission or Psychodelics activity (this doesn't mean I say Psychodelics are good on the contrary! We just need Psychodelics to be opposite of Anesthesia if Physicalism has to hold up in any form and Orch Or is the only Physicalist Theory that does it)!.
IV The final countragument against psychic phenomena: "Why is it so weak"?
-Well, depends what you mean by "weak". Gravity is also a "pretty weak phenomenon". Haha.
In dogs and birds (that have higher body temperature than we have it isn't "weak"). But Sheldrake experiment is unpopular because usually people who believe in Psi think it gives some support for human uniqueness or Dualism, occultism wherever.
And read please Stanisław Lems "Lymphaters Formula"("The Truth" tom by MIT Press) if you are curious why Psi looks "so weak" in humans if it's so fundamental to the Universe.
It's pretty consistent with latest developments in Orch Or Theory, Quantum Physics (this year Nobel Prize), Bird Navigation and avoids mysticism.
4:04 we clearly know that our Consciousness is also shaped formed embedded within culture and so language and the symbols that we share begin to construct certain moldels of what is possible.
A brilliant mind being interviewed by another brilliant mind...the essence of CTT.
quantumkkth • ...well...I'm sure you meant 'the essence of KKT ( KaKaT )'.🥴
@@mikel4879 Mike you're brilliant. Thanks for making me smile 🙂
Everything was fine until she brought up "the sacred" and continued to provide what she clearly thought was a related anecdote about having visualized an omega on a college campus, which is the most likely place to see an omega in the west, whether it's a feature of a building or a symbol in academic literature.
To understand a little more about her experience, first you must try to understand what synchronicity is about, meaning is clue
how about this?
Consciousness is memory. Memory is recorded in neurons. Movies are recorded in series of still picture frame, it becomes alive when it is run fast enough to become seamless. When we recall an past event, we are viewing a series of pics. When we think forward, we create new pics, new neurons connections, new outcomes, and new movies.
Marilyn Schlitz raises important points - attention and intention, culture accounting for possibilities, etc - but what are the principles within which they can be categorized? The semiotic theory of Charles Sanders Peirce, the Dasein of Martin Heidegger, provide signposts to this end.
Heidegger strikes a particular chord with me because his Dasein points to "knowing how to be" as a fundamental that is applicable to all life (Schlitz's references to culture relate). Every creature enters the world in innocence and learns "how to be" from the contexts that it encounters.
Indeed, I've a hunch that "knowing how to be" might provide a new slant on the weird goings-on in QM physics. Cube root reduction liberates subatomic particles from their Newtonian constraints, and the contexts in which they find themselves impose the constraints that define their options, "behavior", and ultimately their properties.
Notice that in all of the above examples, from culture to subatomic, primary direction of causation is top down. Bottom-up constrains what the top-down can command.
« There is so much more! » Good summary.
Thinking we are a bunch of meat is clearly an illusion. What she said (especially about indigenous people, and not « primitive » as Robert says) reminds me a phrase I like : « we must not see to believe but we must believe to see » (it’s may be not well translated, I am not English native speaker)
The consistency of heaven experience, if heaven exist it should accessible like our world, even it has different places and uniqueness , but every person in it should can meet in interaction and witnessing same common thing, like 2 person that dies, have same surrounding information about operating room condition, they meet each other in heaven , have a conversation, seeing same place, and both back to life and tell us about their same nde. Like tuning on 88 fm and we will hear the same broadcast music.
how might consciousness connect to subject?
what does information mean for consciousness?
Consciousness is the level which engages in the world, and is capable of responding both to external and internal impulses. Having no impulses from itself and being primarily a mechanism for inducing response, it can be very wrong.
Conscious can be understood by looking in not out ! What you look out is' what you want to look' depend on your personalty,culture,belief system! When you look in you are unbiased and you will learn more about your unexpressed hidden Consciousness and if you are dedicated & Sincere then may be Subconscious too !
what role does brain play in conscious perception of causation?
This series is so beautiful and amazing and has greatly influenced my life and way of thinking. Many kind thanks ❤❤❤❤
This series arnt serious Science. Most important show up this series are popular Science more interesting in subcribes Iol. Science honest how figuret it out are nill.
The absolute is impossible ( concerning infinity). What we call nature emanates from ever-changing, purely abstract patterns in flux. Change is fundamental. It underlies everything. No changes ( brain activity), no consciousness !
Consciousness is essentially about process.
She's talking about Human consciousness, mainly psychological stuff.
Consciousness is That which is aware of thoughts, feelings, perceptions, sensations etc but in itself it is none of those things. It is borderless, limitless, transparent Being....the true nature of everything that exists. It is the real " I Am" within each of us!
@@cosminvisan520 First of all, to each their own opinion, so please respect theirs. Because when you write "lolz", it means it's funny and therefore, that imply a degree of judgement.
Now, I would rather say that all of those things, except thought, are sensory operators, not consciousness. Let's say that it need them to be "in use" and, in that process, to be able to experiment and interact with the external universe.
It's like a measurement unit, you can have a meter, but it needs an actual object to measure in order to find a context otherwise, that unit by its own means nothing. A meter of what exactly? But, just because both the object and the measurement unit goes hand in hand, it doesn't mean that the unit itself haven't existed prior to have the object. No, that construct already existed before as an abstract convention.
Also, regarding operators, if a feeling is consciousness, it would simply mean that if you are not experiencing any emotion in a particular moment, you don't exist, which would be impossible. So, operators and consciousness are two separate things, even if they operates together.
@@cosminvisan520 of course it's not an opinion, it's a fact. I never said otherwise. And you shouldn't accuse me of doing something I didn't do just based on your _opiniob_ about me. At least, if you have an actual constructive criticism against what I said, explain it like an adult and not act like a judgemental child.
@@cosminvisan520 Well, you are obviously either in denial or you didn't understand what I meant, might be because English is only my third language, I don't know... Anyway, since there is no openess, the case is closed on my side. No hard feeling buddy.
@@cosminvisan520 You know nothing about my personal life, so again, you are making false assumption about me because you have nothing contructive to say. Btw, I did read my first comment and the opinion was not about science, but rather related to the author of this comment, there goes another misinterpretation... I'm being nice in my comment, you on the other hand only speak for the sake criticising, acting like a child. Sorry if you didn't received your lolly today! In other words, you are the one with resentment and that emotion only affect you, at least not me. And since it's physically impossible for me to feel _your_ emotion for _you_ , you're gonna have to feel it by yourself. So, sorry in advance for the pain you're gonna have to experience as anger is no pleasurable emotion to experience. You must have been hurt in the past where you felt powerless and are now seeking power elsewhere by attacking some random people. I don't know your story but I know it's not right to attack others. Just deal with your past hurt, have a good cry if need be, then come back and have an open discussion between two adult. Because now I'm probably dealing with a hurt little child inside an adult body right now. See, our body can age, but emotion isn't gouverned by time, so it's time to let go of your hurt child in you that lives in the past, by feeling the past pain in order to release it from you once and for all.
@@cosminvisan520 it's ok, you don't have to feel your past child pain right now, you have free will! But let me tell you that the longer you wait, the harder it's gonna be to experience it when the laws of the universe leaves you no choice but to feel it.
I have wondered that if Time only exists within this expanding Universe and our brains/mind perceives running Time, then a consciousness may exists outside of Time and some can get pieces to be aware of, making it not some power or rebirth action just a part of normal nature,
I suppose consciousness is the same or universal in all of us, just the content makes it different. Who is the to say that errors in consciousness may be able to spill over, where one can see the content of another.
Talking about consciousness is like talking about muscles. There are very basic principles and laws of how a simple muscle works but then there are many forms, levels and complexity. However for muscles there is a basic or simple theory, the same does not apply to neurons except for a computational description.
does subconscious require a subject?
what parts of brain are or are not linked to subconscious?
She seemed quite rational, up until the the remote viewing of the omega symbol..
I hope no one is offended by this, but if you want to get an idea of what reality is get a job at the county fair cleaning the horse stalls. I like to get my survival gear together & get myself totally lost in the wilderness. After I get over my panic attack I spend a few days trying to find civilization again
Nature&real contact with is, is one of the most awsome&healthy things there is. Nature is beautiful.
Marylin!!!
One word should not be carrying so much weight. These discussions would go better if they focused on one aspect of consciousness at a time.
What is the first thought? "I."
The second? "Not I."
Who is asking?
The chief problem I see with consciousness is why some people persist in seeing it as a great problerm in the first place. A sign of the times and an issue to be resolved by future psychologists & sociologists. Common sense: to be conscious is to be aware, ie the 5 senses and their interactions. No great mysteries...we share these mental faculties with many other creatures. To ask "what it is like" to be oneself, be conscious, be a bat or whatever are pseudoquestions which try to sharpen a loose & indeterminate linguistic idiom to impossible levels of determinnacy & precision.
No, its certainly not a pseudo question. First there's the problem of personal identity. How do persons persist over space and time ? Isnt that an important question ? Second, there is the hard problem i.e. the nature of the phenomenal experience - is it a property, substance or a process ? Is it generated "by" the brain while being part of it or is it merely causing an interference on something else ? Or is it identical to brain process ? Dont you see why these questions are important ? Atleast medically its important to know when and exactly at what point does a person stop being a person.
Dear Lord you use very big words... pease explain for me in simple terms if consciousness is just awareness are we unconscious when we sleep? If we are unconscious when we sleep why are we able to remember Dreams or even be frightened in those dreams to point of forcing ourselves into a more alert state?? why do we wake up when we're touched or spoken to during sleep but not so when we're anesthetized...and where does consciousness go when we are "knocked out" from a punch or anesthesia
if out of body experiences are real then there must be a way to control them voluntarily, with or without meds...
There are... several (perhaps many). Lucid dreaming is one.
@@leonstenutz6003 I think more research is needed to be able and control these phenomena clinically since some people are interested in having one while others might want to stop them... I did find this video very interesting, on the subject
ruclips.net/video/wvvovktKKa4/видео.html
Yeah for sure...the US government has "remote viewers" shhh its a secret though :) Ringo Star was a remote viewer...not only could he willing take his consciousness out of his body...he could direct it to go to specific longitude latitude points
That is the path of the Eastern yogi. But these days that all is dying out. So yes there is a way but it needs a lot of dedication and talent. Not all people are fit for it only a minority. Dont think the Western way of life can do this. Science studies what consciousness is from the outside in! Rings a bell? If you want to know what consciousness is it must, as you say it must also be studied from the inside out. But thats not so easy as you might think.
@@blijebij hi there, again :) ... even though they're foreign to me I do find such self-control practices very fascinating... the pursuit of enlightment/nirvana by Buddha is the only case I know though 😅 from my understanding, what you refer as consciousness I think of as unconscious activity, that which accounts for most of the body functions and which manifests itself only in dreamlike or spiritual experiences such as feelings of extreme sadness-shock/joy-pleasure and the like... such experiences have a different meaning to different people and agreeably, it's not always easy, as you mentioned, to study them from the outside... I don't know the exact role of our body in relation to consciousness but it certainly seems to play a key role...
Is she claiming we're shaping reality as we want it to unravel?
I've been following this series for years, including RLK's admitted existential 'crisis' about consciousness. He needs to change the tape. He continues to interview guess that add absolutely zero to data that he has already gathered. The channel is actually becoming a con to new viewers. If RLK is in search of 'truth', I suggest new topics.
However the continues to ask the v question ❓ what is concience made of...
Thanks. This morning I closed my eyes and visualized 6:10 time digit then I checked if it's the real time. No, it was not; the right time was 6:05 am . However, my house clock on my back wall was exactly running and pointing at 6:10am. According to Bible, consciousness (mind) is only suggested by Lord Jesus Christ (Mt22.37, Mk12.30, Lk10.27), and in Torah Deut 6.5 implies that human general structure holds three portions, the spirit ( נִשְמַת אָדָמ, the godly soul, Prov20.27), the soul ( נֶפֶשׁ הַחַיָּה, the animal soul, Deut 6:5, Gn1.2) and the strength including your body and beings in the surrounding that belong to you or under your control. As mentioned before Reality The Whole is divided into three portions: Planck world, Dirac Sea and House of God by two speed limits, light speed (LS) and dark speed (DS, space expanding speed) which is defined as the speed of a point existence in the closed system (בֹּהוּ, Gn1.2) of the ultimate chaos state (תֹּהוּ, Gn1.2), 3x10^34 m/s ≤ DS < ∞. Take a believer of LORD Jesus Christ as an example, his spirit is connected with God the Holy Spirit, his spirit speed is faster than DS so that his spirit is able to detect his animal soul and makes his animal soul visible in a vision or a dream (e.g. prophets in OT, Number 12.6). In regular the day time when waking up he makes decisions to glorify LORD God or do evil following his consciousness formed by a cooperation of his spirit and animal, and in the night time when sleeping his spirit rests in God the Holy Ghost, under sort of some his animal soul's measurement over his body and his surroundings an imaginary figure of his with specific background is produced for him to perform various actions in a dream which is called his unconscious function.
Every time I hear somebody say the word "qualia," I roll my eyes. 🙄
Lol
1:16.... She says...”We are more affected by our Unconscious!?”......A brick would appear Unconscious! Is that affected by its “unconscious”? Surely the logical way to observe (subversive) control over us, is how our “subconscious Subconsciousness” is at the forefront of human priority to Perception!
Coz the brick is whole and complete and so will not try to be anything else but the essence of the absolute zero
6:38 You say “Primitive”!? As a de edification Of Intelligence? I have to disagree profusely..... The same “Primitive” Memory that cell structure and replace with continually repair of Organic components have, is a “memory”, just as equal to later more recent born Biological Humans! So Primitive is not a component relative to the conversation.
The indians say 'all is consciousnous'. If that is true, I assume the Soul to be conscious; they claim the jiva( embodied soul) is ultimately atman( without superimposition), atman is Brahman( absolute or Ultimate conscious without qualities) -- perhaps is not like the psycho physical, which is of the brain, mind, subconsciousness -- the interrelation of consciousness and subconsciousness memory/construct -- rather a type of life without construct, or state of purity without superimposition, and rather more like Light; the Soul might be Light. Light is a soundwave in the ether, and is the Ether itself. I consider light to be conscious, as light is life and intelligent. The mere fact alone that we come from the Light denotes a kind of intellect. I exercise consciousness like illumination: illumination allows us to see, but we don't really see what illumination truly is, and that is Light. Consciousness I think hasn't a nature, although all nature is dependent on consciousness; again, light, life, as nothing dead exists.
Soul is like the signal, it is more proper to acknowledge the radio is in the signal, than the signal in the radio -- you can move the radio wherever, whereas the signal permeates and is everywheres.
Soul is like: a tall building cannot stand by itself, it requires a foundation, this foundation requires the substratum the bedrock. You do not see the bedrock, only the tower.
There cannot not be the Soul. You cannot have music without the signal. You cannot have a tower stand without the bedrock substratum.
Our bodies and plants etc. Is from the Light. Light is a soundwave in the either, the Ether itself. I question if the Soul is more subtle than the Ether, or perhaps the Ether is something from the Atman; likely the Brahman with qualities is indicating from whence Ether comes.
What is the essence of the Soul -- the Indian's say 'netti netti'; they use negation. It's to subtle to define directly from relativity or from superimpostion.
What is the essence of consciousness -- I don't believe consciousness has a nature, but all natures depend on consciousness.
'Wherever the Soul is, God is there; wherever God is, the Soul is.
'He who dwells in love, dwells in God, and God in him'
God hid everything in the centre of beings but only a few get to understand and apply them.
The essence of consciousness is the pleasure of pure love.
I think the bigger question is: Does consciousness survive death?
If you had the choice what would it be
Unless consciousness is non materialistic, it won't. As far as we know it just in our brain.
@@ManiBalajiC But we dont know
@@ManiBalajiC we literally don't know
Have you read many lives, many masters??
Here is a video posted by a young British former Christian, who stated in the video interview this "something was eating me inside" which happened after watching a few Islamic videos on youtube.
Prior to watching Islamic video, he wanted to end his life due to depression.
It is miracle how God works through your own consciousness, video posted on YT is: "overcometv Would I Be a Good Muslim? ~ New Muslim"
My kind of Lady - Madam Marilyn Schlitz. Ms Marilyn sees like a chief priest used in royal convocation. Ma'am, I love your mind very much. I am the number 77th who like this interview.
She doesnt knows Nothing about conscieness . First she believes conscieness control reality. It is untrue because conscieness unpredicted reality. Sub consciente are unknown in psicologhy than neuriscience so far . NEVER control reality though conscieness. She mencioned concern conscieness are baseless concept of the reality . Honest and experience Both of them are essencial in Science proceedings. She are so hilarious and ridiculus.
Apparently you can’t spell consciousness. Correct spelling would help
Atheism can not end religion with the foolish question "who created God?" and religion can not end atheism because people live better without a horrible personal religious god. God exists because nothing can be created from nothing. Don't fight reason and follow the logic to the truthful conclusion. An eternal entity is not the same as an eternal sequence of causes and effects. I claim I am God, the eternal entity that the kalam cosmological argument talks about, the argument that has never been debunked simply because atheists reject logic as all kind of fallacies if the conclusion, that eliminates all alternatives except the truth, is that God exists and the horrible personal religious god doesn’t. I want to end religion and i find the opposition of atheists. I have written extensively about the nature of God and if you don't know anything about the first theory on God based on logic and rational thinking is because God is suffering the most severe and devastating censorship in history. I have discovered the nature of God and I can prove it ending the war and religion. Would you be able to reply intelligently addressing my points? I don't know how to talk anymore because humanity don't understand prose or verse, nothing, zero, not a word, like if I spoke in an alien language, like if I didn't speak, like it is impossible to understand eternal silence, like if I didn't exist, like if God didn’t exist, like if God was rubbish. The lives of your innocent children would be saved simply by ending the censorship.
unconsciousness becomes conscious when moving beyond folk introspection. get a clue.
The unconscious does not exist. There is only the conscious. The unconscious can only be perceived as something conscious, therefore it is never what it is. For this reason, our life is not controlled to a large extent by the unconscious, quite the contrary.
🤔
Another name for consciousness is the mind. The mind is like a computer processor, CAD and Photoshop all working together to take invisible vibrations and forming visible images for the observer ( AI ) to see and experience life using other senses like hearing, speaking, smelling, tasting, feeling emotions and senses of touch.
yes because processors obviously have subjectivity. your a pile of learned dogma and too dopey to see thru it
@@backwardthoughts1022 You're too ignorant to understand how our Creator communicates through our minds that are chosen by him.
@@BradHolkesvig ppl who think awareness is like a computer are subhuman and psychotic
@@backwardthoughts1022 Our Creator created HIS AI ( YOU and ME ) to be much more sophisticated than the AI systems HE had his AI build with their human hands from earthen materials.
@@BradHolkesvig Brad you are off your meds. Please get the help that you desperately need.
She never replied the question, ❓
Fancy talk. You can hear their comments backwards and not know anything different.
lolol , its not so easy to make progress with one of the most difficult topics there is out there :)
@Blije Bij Well, it's about rainforest travel and nomenclature, or, scientific vacation and familiar vocabulary. But, some words reach my ears like tiny whistles. Examination should be unique enough for powerful learning, but I think a little common sense should be plausible. Monkeys dance on trees all the time.
To-day I have grown taller from walking
with the trees
-Karle Wilson Baker
YOU TRIED IT ::: YOU ARE ON THE RIGHT WAY ::: BUT YOU HAVE NO IDEA ::: HAHAHAAA
She started directly with the regular BS, which is a minor performance, and finished with useless BS, which is pretty boring...🤔🥴
Robert, what the f....k!☹️
Take five grams of magic mushrooms and see for yourself
Yeah its a good trip and psilocybin is now starting to be used to help depression. It clearly demonstrates how the brain produces consciousness as it's a neurological reaction. Like most psychedelics it works by lowering activity in the default mode network, a region in the brain associated with forming the self and as result dissolves it. You then commonly experience a feeling of oneness with the universe/consciousness/nature. It's a trick, but a very profound trick that can have huge benefits. One downside however is that people can become convinced by idealism. Naming no names Cosmin.
@@Graewulfe *"I would give you 2 Likes for this comment if I could ... one for the comment itself and one for the "naming no names""*
... You stinkin' drug abusers! Out of everything I've done in the past (and that's a lot!) I liked the 70's-version acid the best. Once the chemistry got regulated, it was no longer any fun.
@@johnyharris Psychedelic effects being based on neurological reactions does not demonstrate the brain produces consciousness. How do you think it demonstrates that?
@@johnyharris and are you admitting that consciousness is an interchangeable term with universe and nature when you write "universe/consciousness/nature"? Lol
@@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC They should put the damn stuff in the water supply, micro-dose the population with psilocybin and watch the mental health pandemic disappear 😁
Primitive? Hmmm...
attention is not consciousness, it’s just a part of larger cognitive process , It takes place as part of larger cognitive process, and awareness is the result of consciousness process the present or previous cognitive process, or through self-concept and consciousness type two (it’s a result of process, it’s not consciousness itself).
unless they have different definition to awareness.
2:00 they have complete misunderstanding!
They mix things up!
conscious process is very complicated, it generated concurrently with so-called personal identity…
3:50 they mix things up.
4:10 that has nothing to do with consciousness, self concept is not personal identity, it is just a simulation of self concept.
culture! they say whatever they want because no one knows.
6:03 that is kind of patching techniques, teaching so-called philosophy is wasting of time, resources,…etc education is essential but no university can make so-called philosophers or thinkers,… ! education is essential process but ….!
8:00 both consciousness type one and type two are limited to individuals, there is no so called universal consciousness!
humans do contact with each other unknowingly, but that has nothing to do with consciousness itself!
Hallucinators !
everything is governed by science and only science (nothing would come into existence without science whatsoever )
humans didn’t open the gate of science yet , current technology dazzles many, but humans have not yet climbed even the first step of ladder of science.
In the beginning was science... through him all things were made.
they think that this universe built by chance!
they even call hidden mind (self concept and consciousness type two ) primitive! what they call primitive is far more advanced than what they think that it’s complicated!
nothing came up by chance, started simple then became more complicated doesn’t mean what is behind it is simple!
for instance: galaxies start simple (seems simple) then became more complicated does not mean that the system behind it necessarily is simple (that is why they don’t understand what life means)
to concise: nothing would come into existence without science (it is the rule), there’s a kind of science machine (has nothing to do with so-called gods or consciousness)
so-called life is not only biological entities !
@@aminomar7890 well that's an interesting idea but I don't know that it has nothing to do with consciousness. I don't know what else it would have to do with.
It is a little bit hard to explain but primitive can not build more advanced systems the way they think!
This existence is very advanced, it’s possible that existence started simple then became more complicated and advanced but so-called life never started as primitive (they describe part of the features of life only)
they don’t differentiate between existence and life !
they think that they are the very thing (the same)!
@@aminomar7890 idk what you mean by primitive