Amazing Suppressor News || AntiGunners Big Sad

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 29 ноя 2024
  • We just got the news figures out of the ATF on Suppressor ownership in America. You people are crushing it out there. With the processing time of NFA paperwork at an all time low Americans added 1.4 Million suppressors to the registry in the first half of 2024. that is more than the first 83 years of the NFA combined. 'Merica! There are many people on the fence waiting for the hearing protection act to pass. We have been here before. My message to you- don’t hold your breath; we have been here before.
    ALL LINKS, Join the Email List, and get discounts from the affiliates page: linktr.ee/vso_...
    #vsogunchannel
    The VSO Gun Channel is an educational resource of VSO Media LLC, a media production company, and VSOrdnance LLC, a research and development/ Testing Evaluation "contract lab". VSO is not in the business of selling or promoting the sale of firearms. Nothing VSO publishes should be misconstrued to support the sale of Firearms, components, or accessories. The VSO Gun Channel serves as a common sense, educational resource promoting responsible gun ownership and safety particularly for young minds otherwise negatively influenced by a fundamental breakdown of our society.
    Unless otherwise stated, the subject matter of this video was provided by the manufacturer or another third party at no cost to us. In doing so, VSO reserves all creative rights, including the right to publish negative aspects it deems relevant to the representation of the product and its continuous improvement. VSO Gun Channel only publishes objective content related directly to tests performed by its personnel. While in-depth test results may be shared directly with manufacturers prior to official release, they must agree NOT to: impede VSO's work, attempt to undermine or alter our results, impugn or undermine our integrity, and must forfeit any expectation of being involved in the process. To be clear to our viewers, VSOrdnance LLC provides testing, evaluation, research, and product development consulting services to clients, for which it is compensated. It is solely at VSO's discretion whether or not to turn footage over to VSO Gun Channel for the publishing video derived from such tests and experience with these products. These are separate-No party may buy our opinion & No party may buy access to our audience even if it is their ulterior motive to do so by contracting the testing.
    If you are interested in VSO's services you may submit an official inquiry via email to the contact email listed on channel the "about" page

Комментарии • 1 тыс.

  • @VSO_Gun_Channel
    @VSO_Gun_Channel  9 дней назад +125

    Folks, I know the devices are expensive; however, this idea that deregulation of the devices is going to drop their price 50% overnight is just ludicrous.
    Maybe in 10 years after deregulation you will see that kind of reduction but these are not all aluminum tubes.

    • @andrewcarlson2178
      @andrewcarlson2178 9 дней назад +61

      Actually, once they're deregulated the cost will go up due to higher demand. It was never about the cost for me. It's about the infringement of paying a special "tax", begging extra permission, and most importantly, being put on a special list. If confiscation were ever to occur, this is a defacto registration list and the fastest and easiest to find.

    • @uoislame
      @uoislame 9 дней назад +25

      deregulation will have a big impact on prices for cheaper cans for sure. 50% might not be that quick, but certainly something that is just a simple baffle stack with a hub mount will be incredibly cheap and available. those are easily mass produced. and you know someone like PSA would buy some company and pump them out like daggers. sure they won't be as good as like an RC3 or survive that kind of fire schedule, but it won't cost $1700

    • @mechwar31
      @mechwar31 9 дней назад +42

      Brandon Herrera for ATF Director

    • @Real_Tim_S
      @Real_Tim_S 9 дней назад +28

      But, with the end of regulation - home construction will likely take off exponentially, this ease of availability and crowd-sourcing of designs will conceivably push prices lower and performance up naturally.
      This is the effect of deregulation in just about any space - without the bureaucratic and administrative overhead creating an artificial price inflation, the market is free to find its own price.

    • @ShootingUtah
      @ShootingUtah 9 дней назад +8

      Eh, I think we'll also have an explosion of new manufacturers making them if they're not regulated so heavily. So the price will probably drop somewhat. The big thing is now anyone with a bit of know how will be able to make their own! This would drop the prices of things like .22 cans especially and maybe some types of pistol suppressors. I think the extra cool high speed super performing stuff that's full auto rated will probably stay about the same price as now.

  • @fsarfino
    @fsarfino 9 дней назад +609

    in common use time to remove them from the NFA & refund the unconstitutional tax.

    • @KeekTheUnique
      @KeekTheUnique 9 дней назад +28

      There are over 757,000 machine guns too!

    • @romanandrews1438
      @romanandrews1438 9 дней назад +27

      @@fsarfino they needa do the same for SBRs if they have to declare cans as common use. Thatd be just as awesome. But both being deemed common use would be even awesomer!

    • @fsarfino
      @fsarfino 9 дней назад +3

      @@romanandrews1438 Agreed

    • @jargero8203
      @jargero8203 9 дней назад +17

      Still doesn't change the fact that they're selling $70 in materials for $1000!!!! Tax stamp is irrelevant

    • @romanandrews1438
      @romanandrews1438 9 дней назад +5

      @jargero8203 its robbery

  • @wdtaut5650
    @wdtaut5650 9 дней назад +262

    If a poll tax violates the Constitution, why is it legal to require the payment of a tax to own a firearms component?

    • @musicman1eanda
      @musicman1eanda 9 дней назад +13

      Because laws are only words on paper unless they're followed. The anti gunners have gotten so good at ignoring the Constitution, that everyone thinks we need bills like carry reciprocity. Such a bill shouldn't be necessary because the 2A says KEEP and BEAR arms, yet here we are that if you carry into a state like Jersey you'll be arrested and jailed in violation of the constitution.

    • @I_S_Chew
      @I_S_Chew 9 дней назад +5

      It’s really hard to argue with that point (while maintaining logic).

    • @Javii96
      @Javii96 9 дней назад +6

      If some states say you don’t need an ID to vote, why do we need an ID to purchase firearms?

    • @WilliamArrington-m7d
      @WilliamArrington-m7d 8 дней назад

      @@musicman1eanda If we look at all rights the same the lefts argument melts. They say the founding fathers could not have known what tech would bring.... cool.. Lets talk about your computer then and how its not protected because its not quill and pen

    • @JamesCopeland-i1j
      @JamesCopeland-i1j 8 дней назад

      Because it's an attachment, that is unnecessary to to the operation of the firearm itself... at least, that's THEIR excuse 🤦‍♂️

  • @rayjohnson3038
    @rayjohnson3038 9 дней назад +237

    There shouldn't even be a registry to begin with for "accessories"

    • @markoredano9141
      @markoredano9141 9 дней назад +9

      Federal law defines them as a firearm, so how can they get away with calling it an accessory?

    • @ritotron5752
      @ritotron5752 9 дней назад +10

      @@markoredano9141 that’s exactly what Clarence Thomas said

    • @Jiggy5166
      @Jiggy5166 9 дней назад +5

      I'm confused on how they decided that it counts as a firearm, what part of their legal definition does the suppressor fit under? (3)The term “firearm” means (A) any weapon (including a starter gun) which will or is designed to or may readily be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive; (B) the frame or receiver of any such weapon.
      In the second half of their definition, how do they get away with using the defining word in their definition? Does that not defeat the purpose of a definition?
      (C) any firearm muffler or firearm silencer; or (D) any destructive device. Such term does not include an antique firearm.
      Looks like a load of BS to me.
      That's like DOT saying you have to register your after market car bumper as a vehicle just because we tacked onto the end of the definition of a vehicle "any vehicle bumper". Absolutely asinine!

    • @ritotron5752
      @ritotron5752 9 дней назад +2

      @@Jiggy5166 don’t have to tell me, I have a felony suppressor conviction. Hopefully it all gets overturned.

    • @fyou2327
      @fyou2327 8 дней назад +1

      There shouldn't be a registry for guns either.

  • @rogerpeters2671
    @rogerpeters2671 9 дней назад +173

    Regulating suppressors is about his stupid as regulating earplugs

    • @jjones503
      @jjones503 9 дней назад +4

      Thanks Hollywood!

    • @9eyeh8chu9
      @9eyeh8chu9 8 дней назад +11

      it’s not that baffling if you look at it through the lens that the government DOES NOT want you to have a tactical advantage over them, which should additionally indicate to you about how they view you. They view you as a threat to them and their extortion of your labor and don’t want you to have a single hope that you could ever possibly revolt and revert them back into public servants. That is all. That’s the truth. You’re welcome

    • @kungfudavie
      @kungfudavie 7 дней назад +4

      It’s wild that in the UK that has some of the most restrictive gun laws, we can just walk in and buy them.

    • @kimmichaels899
      @kimmichaels899 2 дня назад

      ​@@kungfudavie ya, in Europe you can buy a suppressor but not a firearm...😂😂😂

  • @waterboy330
    @waterboy330 9 дней назад +230

    Let’s go Brandon for ATF Director!

    • @peachfuds
      @peachfuds 9 дней назад

      Ayo

    • @chrissewell1608
      @chrissewell1608 8 дней назад +1

      Joe Biden for ATF director? WTF are you thinking!?

    • @ImLiterally.Him.
      @ImLiterally.Him. 8 дней назад +17

      @@chrissewell1608he’s referring to Brandon Herrera. A big gun dude that is being nominated for the ATF director

    • @jameyjacade28
      @jameyjacade28 8 дней назад +3

      Absolutely not, disband the atf. We don’t need them

    • @waterboy330
      @waterboy330 8 дней назад +6

      @@jameyjacade28 Brandon said he would recommend it after he utterly destroyed the ATF.

  • @multicammando
    @multicammando 9 дней назад +73

    Brandon Herrera for ATF Director!!!! Spread the word!

    • @Patrickhenry17seventysix
      @Patrickhenry17seventysix 9 дней назад +6

      There is an online petition to appoint Herrera as ATF director I signed did you?

    • @KelzCasa
      @KelzCasa 9 дней назад +4

      Let’s go Brandon has a whole new meaning now! 🤘🏽🤘🏽🤘🏽

  • @CMB21497
    @CMB21497 9 дней назад +201

    The eFile AND the The Silencer Shop Kiosk was a monumental step to make this process easier.

    • @Nethezbet
      @Nethezbet 9 дней назад +10

      I wasn't able to use the kiosk but I am really happy they have that. Making the ridiculous process easier is value added, for sure.

    • @shutyourcockholster
      @shutyourcockholster 9 дней назад +3

      i used the kiosk. still waiting 5 months later

    • @devinotterbine3287
      @devinotterbine3287 9 дней назад +3

      @shutyourcockholster same, but waited 11 months total. The wait was from end of '22 to almost '24.

    • @evilsam4
      @evilsam4 9 дней назад

      @@devinotterbine3287 Yup that's the ATF for u

    • @chuckb3489
      @chuckb3489 9 дней назад +1

      I waited 12 months, the day I went to pick it up there ahead of me only waited 2 weeks, this was in February when the atf started pushing them through. Lol

  • @Nethezbet
    @Nethezbet 9 дней назад +431

    "Poll taxes are illegal, you can't tax rights"

    • @GmanGSW
      @GmanGSW 9 дней назад +37

      And, in reference to the 14 month Suppressor/Silencer waits, a Right Delayed is a Right Denied. I add that, in addition to the comment...

    • @thegrey8643
      @thegrey8643 9 дней назад +10

      You cant tax rights but you best believe they did again and again and again friendo and without a single consequence.

    • @Nethezbet
      @Nethezbet 9 дней назад +3

      @thegrey8643 Just seems like such an obvious attack, lol

    • @NicholasMaus
      @NicholasMaus 9 дней назад

      how many states just passed voter ID? voting is a constitutional right. if you have to pay for an ID and you need an ID to vote, it's a pole tax.

    • @A_potato9772
      @A_potato9772 9 дней назад +7

      That's just an argument for ID to be available for issue without fees being as you pretty much require it to be a functional adult.​@@NicholasMaus

  • @FrostyDeSwoleMan
    @FrostyDeSwoleMan 9 дней назад +125

    Best quote “ Never in the history of ever was it a good idea to wait on your government to save you. “ that had me rolling!

    • @GmanGSW
      @GmanGSW 9 дней назад +1

      I was rolling, in agreement, myself, about that comment...

    • @andrewcarlson2178
      @andrewcarlson2178 9 дней назад +2

      Great quote, poor context. I don't NEED a suppressor bad enough to go on their list

  • @MP-qn1jw
    @MP-qn1jw 9 дней назад +66

    You just put the biggest smile on my face. 2A makes no mention of permission slips.

    • @TheCrusher72
      @TheCrusher72 9 дней назад

      “Well regulated”?

    • @jewmanchoolee466
      @jewmanchoolee466 9 дней назад +3

      Is the 2a a collective right? what did well regulated mean at the time of ratification? Is there a prefatory clause and operative clause in the 2A? Are the first 9 amendments listed all collective rights execpt for the 2A? Why was a bill of rights added into the constitution?
      Your comment shows your lack of education on the constitution, anytime someone brings up "well regulated" to argue for gun control shows their ignorance on the subject.

    • @TheCrusher72
      @TheCrusher72 9 дней назад

      @@jewmanchoolee466 either definition you gun wackos want to use, you still seem to ignore that part. Whether it means laws applied or it means a well trained and disciplined militia - abiding by regulations, it still speaks to some law and control. Only an ignoramus like you can’t understand that we have a gun problem here…

    • @letsdothis9063
      @letsdothis9063 День назад +1

      ​@@jewmanchoolee466 well regulated meant "kitted out", or well equipped. A standard soldier in full gear was called a "regular"
      for example.
      Regulated had a different meaning in military context.
      I wish that people were a little more educated on terminology.
      Well regulated meant full (up to date) kit and well trained.

    • @jewmanchoolee466
      @jewmanchoolee466 День назад

      @@letsdothis9063 i am aware lol

  • @DavidA20200
    @DavidA20200 9 дней назад +175

    I own 17 cans so far. Happy to contribute to the cause.

    • @Hickamfield
      @Hickamfield 9 дней назад +42

      3400 in tax stamps wow. I have two and 400 seems like to much

    • @RobertPatton-kz6lq
      @RobertPatton-kz6lq 9 дней назад +31

      You can’t be trusted with money lol

    • @kevinfitzpatrick5949
      @kevinfitzpatrick5949 9 дней назад +12

      Damn son! Goals XD

    • @boywonderrr71
      @boywonderrr71 9 дней назад +11

      Hot dam!! A man of Focus and sheer phucing will!! Great job bro!!

    • @Quantiples
      @Quantiples 9 дней назад +8

      Awesome, I’ll send you my address.

  • @andrewcarlson2178
    @andrewcarlson2178 9 дней назад +100

    It just goes to show that $200 was a prohibitive cost for most Americans for the first 60 to 70 years. Which was precisely the point.

    • @savagestevens6398
      @savagestevens6398 9 дней назад +11

      Exactly. $200 in 1934 was the equivalent of about $4700 today.

    • @SixOFord
      @SixOFord 8 дней назад +6

      It's still prohibitive. The price of an average can doesn't look too bad until you figure in processing fees and that $200 stamp.

    • @scotts148
      @scotts148 8 дней назад +3

      Good thing the geniuses in Con-gress didn’t index the tax to inflation!

    • @CHAOSMOVEMENT
      @CHAOSMOVEMENT 8 дней назад +3

      Well, now the suppressor itself has a prohibitive cost.

    • @Thunderchickenbr549
      @Thunderchickenbr549 7 дней назад

      @@CHAOSMOVEMENTyou can get a decent AR can for $500 now. They will soon get cheaper as competition and supply grows.

  • @trangia12
    @trangia12 9 дней назад +75

    The government has no business demanding my fingerprints unless I broke a law.

    • @whereswaldo5740
      @whereswaldo5740 9 дней назад +5

      It’s intimidation to make you behave when you get one to assure you think they will get you fer shur.

    • @Lugghandle
      @Lugghandle 9 дней назад +7

      They took your finger prints and feet prints right after you were born.

    • @VFRNinja
      @VFRNinja 8 дней назад +6

      The whole just say no campaign had us giving fingerprints as kids back in the day.

    • @michaelturk7237
      @michaelturk7237 8 дней назад +4

      Imagine giving your personal biometrics for a simple TOOB lol. Couldn't be me.

    • @trangia12
      @trangia12 7 дней назад

      @@Lugghandle Nope only foot prints

  • @PrayingPanda
    @PrayingPanda 9 дней назад +25

    The reality is that the ATF purposefully changed the process in an effort TO THWART A LEGAL CHALLENGE TO THE NFA. The didn't want to have to explain to a court why americans were paying $200 and waiting over a year to own something even the 1934 congress(and SCOTUS in Miller) said were 2A protected arms.

    • @PrayingPanda
      @PrayingPanda 9 дней назад +1

      Fact is that case law on poll taxes and the Minneapolis Star Tribune SCOTUS case invalidate the NFA. Year-long wait times just give the courts an excuse to heavily restrict the application of the NFA by the ATF or so away with it entirely.

  • @steveninaz9576
    @steveninaz9576 9 дней назад +32

    Its crazy how lowering the wait time made so many more folks buy suppressors.

    • @andrewcarlson2178
      @andrewcarlson2178 9 дней назад +3

      The first 80 years of that was more likely the actual cost of the tax stamp

    • @James_Bee
      @James_Bee 9 дней назад +5

      *It's crazy how lowering the wait time was all it took to get 1.4 million Americans to effectively register their firearms

    • @K.Miller5150
      @K.Miller5150 9 дней назад +1

      ​@James_Bee how ?

    • @steveninaz9576
      @steveninaz9576 9 дней назад +3

      @James_Bee I didn't register any of my arms. What are you talking about? Or are you one of those "I'll wait until they aren't registered before I buy a silencer"?? Good luck with all that, I'll be at the range with all of mine. I have almost 50 and noone knocking on my doors. Stop wasting time.

    • @ALovelyBunchOfDragonballz
      @ALovelyBunchOfDragonballz 9 дней назад

      Which doesnt make sense to me. People using wait times as an excuse to not buy one were just lying to themselves, theyd spend 8 months wishing the wait time would be lower meanwhile I spent 8 months waiting on one.
      8 months later they were still complaining and I had a can.

  • @michaelatkin9649
    @michaelatkin9649 9 дней назад +51

    How is a silncer registered as a firearm? It wont kill or destroy anything. You could leave it in a childs cribe and know your child is not in danger. The simple fact that this govt thinks it can even create a law that keeps you from freely owning something without their knowledge is tyranny. Theres thousand if not millions of laws like this.

    • @Engrave.Danger
      @Engrave.Danger 9 дней назад +3

      @@michaelatkin9649 what if the child partially swallowed it but didn't suffocate due to the hole but couldn't be heard crying for help because the cries were silenced? 😜

    • @ALovelyBunchOfDragonballz
      @ALovelyBunchOfDragonballz 9 дней назад +1

      Because the legal definition of "firearm" also includes a "firearm silencer". You can say its stupid, but you cant claim ignorance when the law is from 1934.

    • @chriscarnes87
      @chriscarnes87 9 дней назад +2

      @@ALovelyBunchOfDragonballz
      You don’t think there were stupid politicians in 1934?

    • @AlitaGunm99
      @AlitaGunm99 8 дней назад

      Because laws don't have to be based in reality.

    • @leeburnley
      @leeburnley 5 дней назад

      Unconstitutional laws and regulations are proof we are all just free-range slaves, yet the majority will never admit it..🤘😎🤘

  • @ChadCooper03
    @ChadCooper03 9 дней назад +48

    That’s pretty sweet. The unfortunate side of this news is realizing that we’ve paid hundreds of millions in tax stamps…

    • @GmanGSW
      @GmanGSW 9 дней назад +10

      Yep! A reason they don't want to give up Suppressor/Silencer "control." Money generated in Tax Stamp revenue! It is better for our ear health, alone, yet they want the additional money... Another reason not to have a humongous Central Government and, in rereading the Federalist & Anti-Federalist Papers with the Constitutional Convention, they knew why in 1791!

    • @Opachki69420
      @Opachki69420 9 дней назад

      We?

  • @ferretapocalypse
    @ferretapocalypse 9 дней назад +53

    I refuse to pay 200 dollar extortion.

    • @A.R.American1
      @A.R.American1 9 дней назад +5

      Me too

    • @LFDNC
      @LFDNC 9 дней назад +1

      Same.

    • @ALovelyBunchOfDragonballz
      @ALovelyBunchOfDragonballz 9 дней назад +3

      Good.
      Its a poll tax: you're not supposed to pay it, you're supposed to give up.

    • @badfastbusa
      @badfastbusa День назад

      Same!

    • @LFDNC
      @LFDNC День назад

      @@ALovelyBunchOfDragonballz I think you’re right. I refuse to give up though.

  • @MrKingArthurhk
    @MrKingArthurhk 9 дней назад +12

    I just got another one today. I am silencer obsessed. This makes me two and I already have a third one in mind. I love firearms, I just prefer them to be quieter. I don’t need more tinititus, nor massive headaches.

  • @downrangefuture6493
    @downrangefuture6493 9 дней назад +46

    Mine is still in government custody. I paid the bail but I’m still waiting on them to process the release.

    • @TyJames864
      @TyJames864 9 дней назад

      Same

    • @Moderndaycowboy74
      @Moderndaycowboy74 9 дней назад

      Same, how long have you been waiting? 2 months for myself

    • @jray4131
      @jray4131 8 дней назад

      This means you are prohibited (until a permission slip is issued) & prohibition is unconstitutional.

  • @DanSanChannel
    @DanSanChannel 9 дней назад +19

    I just applied for my first suppressor last minth. Been wanting one for 25 years and when i heard how long it was tsking to get one i was like, “ i got a $1000 to spare and doing nothing with. Lets get a suppressor 🤷🏽‍♂️”

  • @HollywoodHornet
    @HollywoodHornet 9 дней назад +13

    I will wait until I can buy these as easily as the firearm itself. I refuse to pay a $200.00 tax to the government, for a right, when that same government once said, you can't tax a right, referring to voting. Which is less of a right and owning firearms and accessories, as far as I'm concerned.

  • @TrekTracks74
    @TrekTracks74 8 дней назад +2

    We need to fix government first, so that no matter who the ATF jerkoff is he will have to follow the Will of the People and our constitution! 👍

  • @SigmaSheepdog
    @SigmaSheepdog 9 дней назад +3

    I totally agree with you. I like NFA items, and I have been dealing with them for about 25 years. Throughout that time, I have heard the same thing over and over about the tax and regulations. At this point, you either pay to play or you don't. Yes, NFA items shouldn't be taxed or regulated, but we also shouldn't have to pay so much in income tax or sales tax, especially since a huge portion of our taxes are supporting other countries. There is not much we can do about either.

  • @wideglidebry
    @wideglidebry 9 дней назад +20

    Imagine what the numbers would be if there weren’t barriers between a potential owner and a brand new can. I’m talking about the government introduced barriers of process and tax.

  • @deusvult6632
    @deusvult6632 9 дней назад +65

    No regulations and no tax dollars should be given to the Fed boys.

  • @NBC_NCO
    @NBC_NCO 9 дней назад +10

    Suppressors are any type of device that muffles the sound dampens. The sound reduces the decibels of the sound of a weapon, which should be absolutely mandatory in order to protect your hearing.

    • @speedbuggy16v
      @speedbuggy16v 5 дней назад +1

      we have to have mufflers on cars, trucks tractors and even air tools......

  • @crocswithsocks8496
    @crocswithsocks8496 8 дней назад +1

    Used the silencer shop kiosk at local shop. Process was more involved than i had been led to believe. I am just shy of 1 month and i believe i am very close in the process. I ordered what i did based on what my dealer showed was in stock and could get timely. Turned out they were out of stock. I hope this is what has caused my delay and not the process! Your milage may vary…good luck!

  • @justingreer4829
    @justingreer4829 9 дней назад +18

    Everyone owns a pillow therefor everyone owns a suppressor

  • @markreynolds6715
    @markreynolds6715 9 дней назад +68

    Should be 2 guns per person in your household should be 100% tax deductable. With lights, optics, slings, and suppressor included. And 1000 rounds for each weapon included.
    In other words if you owe 50k in taxes and you spent 30k on guns, then you only owe 20k.
    Guys I'm totally serious here.

    • @Absentiment4l
      @Absentiment4l 9 дней назад +10

      We’re achieving unprecedented levels of winning here we have the house, the senate, the presidency, and a pro 2A AG Matt Gaetz who alongside VP Vance wants to abolish the ATF or has at least talked about it. But even I feel that’s a tall order. I like where your head is at though

    • @svbarryduckworth628
      @svbarryduckworth628 9 дней назад +10

      Militia supplies tax deduction. All arms and accessories should be 100% tax deductable.

    • @jray4131
      @jray4131 8 дней назад +1

      💯% agree

    • @rickfrazier7114
      @rickfrazier7114 7 дней назад

      Taxation is theft

    • @speedbuggy16v
      @speedbuggy16v 5 дней назад +1

      While I do not see it ever happening, I am however on board.

  • @chaoticcaninejb
    @chaoticcaninejb 9 дней назад +15

    Bought another on Monday was approved Tuesday!

    • @bspartee
      @bspartee 9 дней назад +1

      @@chaoticcaninejb I'm on day 92.☹️

    • @omarlo721
      @omarlo721 9 дней назад

      @@bspartee 8 days so far and nothing

    • @Tomatoes1969
      @Tomatoes1969 9 дней назад

      @@bspartee 60ish day. Its my first one. :(

  • @emeralddrgn4
    @emeralddrgn4 7 дней назад +2

    The number would be much higher if our rights werent being denied in certain states (NY, CA, NJ)

  • @yourmomma2995
    @yourmomma2995 9 дней назад +8

    sounds like a common use item to me, should no longer have to register or pay tax.

  • @LTLC
    @LTLC 9 дней назад +2

    4.86 million silencers, that are on the books...

  • @odoyle_rulez
    @odoyle_rulez 7 дней назад +4

    Pro tip: the NFA ONLY applies to dealers and manufacturers. As an individual they can't control what you do with your personal property. For a long time they've been able to convince the general population that they have authority over private citizens and very few actually read it 😂

  • @willie0001
    @willie0001 8 дней назад +2

    I was going to wait until they were not regulated and finally said no and gave up my finger prints. I now have my suppressor and am so happy.

  • @cafn8ed74
    @cafn8ed74 9 дней назад +13

    New Jersey: "You can't have that wish, Little Bear."

    • @Nethezbet
      @Nethezbet 9 дней назад

      Remember, the government can't take your rights, the people have to give them away.

  • @MidwestAdventureTeam
    @MidwestAdventureTeam 9 дней назад +2

    I applied for a suppresor the old way by filling out the paper work. Took them 1 year and 7 months to deny my application because i used the word suppresor instead of the word silencer. They also stated they could not confirm my identity and would have to supply my own background check whatever that means.
    Also took 13 months to get the tax stamp refund.

  • @Raymo2u
    @Raymo2u 9 дней назад +20

    I wont get one until its not taxed or registered. Its common use now, time to remove them from the NFA.

    • @robertlyman9789
      @robertlyman9789 9 дней назад +5

      Remove the NFA

    • @Raymo2u
      @Raymo2u 9 дней назад +1

      @robertlyman9789 I don't see that happening anytime soon, unfortunately. Brandon Herrera, appointed to ATF director, is our best chance at getting our freedom back right now.

  • @leeuniverse
    @leeuniverse 9 дней назад +2

    I'm waiting for the day when we can FINALLY have REAL "Human Rights" when it comes to Self-Defense and our Health.
    "Suppressors" should be SO LEGAL that near EVERY GUN should actually BE a "Suppressor" ITSELF. In other words, the Barrel etc. is actually designed to "suppress" sound.
    In other words, so we don't have to "add" one to a gun. We have a Right to "Safe Hearing".

  • @BrettBaker-uk4te
    @BrettBaker-uk4te 9 дней назад +16

    I'M DOING MY PART!😊

  • @hanenkamm1979
    @hanenkamm1979 8 дней назад +1

    In 2012 I got a physical federal stamp. Last month all I received was an email with a picture of a federal stamp… I want my stamp!

  • @gera2396
    @gera2396 9 дней назад +4

    dang, that's a lot of compliance.

  • @robertcoate7545
    @robertcoate7545 8 дней назад +1

    Sad but true. We’ve given them 300 million dollars in taxes this year.

  • @stevelyons2744
    @stevelyons2744 9 дней назад +57

    Either way, I'm stuck until I can afford one. Its a friggin tube. A tube.

    • @randoonyt270
      @randoonyt270 9 дней назад

      @@stevelyons2744 you could always make your own tube.

    • @willardlentz3044
      @willardlentz3044 9 дней назад +7

      Yep that is me too.
      Fixed income and bidenomics makes it impossible for lower income to get them.
      If deregulated we can make then ourselves and the price of factory made should come down too

    • @theeasternfront6436
      @theeasternfront6436 9 дней назад

      @@willardlentz3044You CAN make them yourself, you just have to submit the paperwork before you build. Form 1.

    • @TheCrusher72
      @TheCrusher72 9 дней назад +2

      @@willardlentz3044it’s going to be way worse under trump, so you better start saving now…

    • @billstone21
      @billstone21 9 дней назад +8

      If you saw what shops pay for cans, you'd be pissed at the shops that sell them. 50% over cost to the retailer is common. I can't even imagine how cheap they are direct from the manufacturer to the distributors like SS and Allen.

  • @sinclairpages
    @sinclairpages 8 дней назад +1

    1.4 million suppressors at $ 200.00 each is $ 280,000,000. That is why they will never be removed from the NFA. ATF and big Gov will not give up that money.

  • @davidstuck2866
    @davidstuck2866 9 дней назад +10

    well, I can not afford to pay the stupid tax, let alone buy a suppressor. so until its legal to make your own, I'm out of luck. living on s.s. SUCKS.

    • @bumpin8833
      @bumpin8833 9 дней назад +3

      Pay the tax and build your own then. Form 1

    • @emeralddrgn4
      @emeralddrgn4 7 дней назад

      If you are that money tight, what would you do if an appliance died or you have a big car repair bill?

  • @murphywd1971
    @murphywd1971 9 дней назад +1

    I HIGHLY recommend getting the electronic fingerprint file! You can take it to your dealer on a thumb drive as many times as you like. This means getting your fingerprints ONE time. Last time I bought a suppressor it took 3 days to get the tax stamp total.

  • @ecrogue4496
    @ecrogue4496 9 дней назад +10

    I haven't had the opportunity to pony up for one yet, also hesitant to even get on that nfa list they keep of everyone who has one. I feel that is 1 infringement too far for me to want to do.

    • @matthewbeaver5026
      @matthewbeaver5026 9 дней назад +4

      Exactly. The $200 extortion pisses me off.
      The forever listed on a registry keeps me from allowin the extortion to truly piss me off.

    • @andrewcarlson2178
      @andrewcarlson2178 9 дней назад

      Totally agree

    • @CFurnace-72
      @CFurnace-72 9 дней назад

      realize that they already have one. Admitted to bu Dettelbach before Congress. He also stated that they pay extra for the option to not access the database. uh huh?

    • @SWo-fj5xv
      @SWo-fj5xv 9 дней назад +1

      If you’ve ever completed a 4473 you’re already on a list, Dettlebach admitted that. Yes, the $200 is BS but the “list fear” isn’t a logical argument.

    • @matthewbeaver5026
      @matthewbeaver5026 9 дней назад

      @@ecrogue4496 being in an illegal database 'registry'
      Isn't the same thing as being on the nfa registry.
      One instance the law reads you must be listed. In the other the law states that it's illegal for the government to keep such a database.

  • @carlkrewler4084
    @carlkrewler4084 9 дней назад +2

    WOW ! So that adds up ! So 4,857,897 @ $200.00 tax stamp = $971,579,400.00 So after close to a Billion Dollars of B.S. tax when do we get a reach around.

  • @donaldslayton2769
    @donaldslayton2769 9 дней назад +8

    I very much want 2 suppressors but at 800 and 1200 for the 2 that I want, I just can't rationalize it

  • @snappyaj9053
    @snappyaj9053 9 дней назад +1

    It is absolutely insane that a $4 item got a $200 tax in 1934. Let freedom pew!

  • @PChelpism
    @PChelpism 9 дней назад +6

    my first time, i bought 3 cans ! all on the first time early this year lol

  • @cleanbeats07
    @cleanbeats07 9 дней назад +1

    I hate hearing about these super short wait times when I've been waiting 3 months for a suppressor, and waited almost a year for another last year

  • @mitchpalmer5116
    @mitchpalmer5116 9 дней назад +5

    I'm not giving the government $200.

  • @BigPhilsSaws
    @BigPhilsSaws 9 дней назад +1

    What I've always wondered is why, two different states have my fingerprints on file, as well as the county sheriffs departments which issued my licenses, the FBI has my fingerprints from a background check when I joined the navy, and they still can't figure out how to ask the fbi for a copy and ask them if I'm still a decent guy.

  • @shawnlewis6660
    @shawnlewis6660 9 дней назад +3

    I bought 7 in the last 3 year. There’s still a few more that I would like to add to my collection.

  • @kilo1901
    @kilo1901 8 дней назад +1

    Can’t afford any Cans at the moment but will buy some when I can.

  • @WexWerxScott
    @WexWerxScott 9 дней назад +4

    I added 3 data points to those numbers this year... Let's make em common use!

  • @dangerdoberman
    @dangerdoberman 6 дней назад +1

    Once they are affordable and don't require permission, then I'll get some.

  • @mcarpen89
    @mcarpen89 9 дней назад +8

    So the big news is that lots of people own suppressors? That isn't news. We've known that.
    Sure it's good for the suppressor industry and normalizing suppressor ownership, but it also represents a massive revenue stream for the government. The ATF thanks you for your generous donations towards keeping them funded. I don't see what's worth celebrating about this. Celebrate when the NFA is repealed.

    • @gunrunner2437
      @gunrunner2437 9 дней назад

      @mcarpen89 the thing is when they become "in common use" they are required to fall off the NFA registry. And the common use standard has been as little as 300,000 units in the past. (I.e. tasers becoming common usage in court)

    • @bumpin8833
      @bumpin8833 9 дней назад

      The $200 doesn't go straight to the ATF.

    • @mcarpen89
      @mcarpen89 9 дней назад +2

      @@bumpin8833 I'll take you at your word on that and my rebuttal is that it doesn't have to. Revenue is revenue and if a department is bringing in a lot of revenue then there's motivation to keep it around.

  • @noahnewcomer5180
    @noahnewcomer5180 9 дней назад

    I felt this. When the “suppressor boom” started I went ahead and finally pulled the trigger on the SF RC2 I had been wanting and it came back approved less than a week!

  • @2A_Patriot
    @2A_Patriot 9 дней назад +4

    Wish I could in the Peoples Republic of Illinois

    • @michaelprather8371
      @michaelprather8371 9 дней назад

      As a Kommiefornia resident I feel you. 😢

    • @GmanGSW
      @GmanGSW 9 дней назад

      You will be able to, methinks, sooner... than later, finally. However, SCOTUS does need to hear and get get rid of "AR" Bans and mag limit bans+, coming up! Also, the Federal Government, and it looks like the time is close, to pull The Supremacy Clause, using the National Guard and Federal Agencies... to Force Baronies, like "Pritzker's IL," to comply with Rights of the People!

  • @__-pl3jg
    @__-pl3jg 8 дней назад +2

    If deregulation happens people wont be buying suppressors as much. They'll make their own for $40-50. Prices from manufacturers will remain constant or reduce over time.

  • @fragout9575
    @fragout9575 9 дней назад +8

    They had all three branches of government before. The hearing act should've been passed in 2017.

  • @jasonmarkou9974
    @jasonmarkou9974 9 дней назад +1

    Thank you for the charts. Makes much more sense and easier to visualize.

  • @darylw792
    @darylw792 9 дней назад +6

    I would love to have a suppressor for my rifles, but I refuse to be treated like a criminal and get finger printed. This violates my right to privacy, property, and the constitutions.

  • @kellym3531
    @kellym3531 9 дней назад +1

    I'll buy one without the extortion fee.

  • @dakotalucky13
    @dakotalucky13 9 дней назад +2

    When can I have one in NY? lol, never mind.

    • @timezone107740
      @timezone107740 9 дней назад

      @@dakotalucky13 same here in CA of course

  • @alexanderdeifel4368
    @alexanderdeifel4368 9 дней назад +2

    Love that bubbly grapefruit lol. There should be no restrictions on any firearm or accessories it is the foundation of our nation.

  • @iwatchyt1881
    @iwatchyt1881 9 дней назад +7

    Dang thats $280,000,000 in 2024 in tax stamps! Its going to be hard to overturn that

  • @brando104
    @brando104 9 дней назад +1

    Duty so right I was one of those people that were like I'm going to wait I'm going to wait I'll probably never actually buy one I don't want to be on some list blah blah blah blah blah I now have more than I ever thought I would own and I'm glad I got into the whole NFA side of firearms and I would never turn back

  • @Tyler9-c8u
    @Tyler9-c8u 9 дней назад +6

    Id like to thank all of you suppressor owners for your sacrifice of willingly putting yourself on a registry.
    Lol.

  • @davidwright2706
    @davidwright2706 9 дней назад +1

    And that doesn't even begin to account for all the unregistered units floating around.

  • @philippefrater2000
    @philippefrater2000 9 дней назад +4

    You Know, in France we buy suppressors like candy! No paperwork! No Brainer! Just buy it! 😂

  • @mikeroloff6343
    @mikeroloff6343 9 дней назад +1

    1.4 mil X $200 tax = way to much for the ATF

  • @joshpeavler3139
    @joshpeavler3139 9 дней назад +13

    All of those purchases created a lovely registry for future.....

    • @andrewcarlson2178
      @andrewcarlson2178 9 дней назад +6

      That's what I've been saying. IF things go really sideways, be prepared because you're their first stop

    • @theeasternfront6436
      @theeasternfront6436 9 дней назад +3

      If shit goes really bad you have to give it up……so what? That possibility isn’t worth not having for me.

    • @joshpeavler3139
      @joshpeavler3139 9 дней назад +1

      @theeasternfront6436 who/whatever gets them inside your house ...

    • @ALovelyBunchOfDragonballz
      @ALovelyBunchOfDragonballz 9 дней назад +3

      A) youre already on a list
      B) _the guns are for fighting the govt in the first place!_

    • @Lethalmuffin87
      @Lethalmuffin87 9 дней назад +2

      @@ALovelyBunchOfDragonballzWe may all be on a list, but sending all your info and fingerprints into the ATF puts an asterisk next to your name lol

  • @360TacticalSolutions
    @360TacticalSolutions 8 дней назад +1

    I’ve been waiting 8 weeks now. I don’t understand how people are getting cleared in 3 days lol

  • @cradboard
    @cradboard 5 дней назад +1

    I'm at 80 days waiting for an e-file w/ digital fingerprints... Meanwhile I'm hearing some people get approved in 1-4 days.

  • @yeahsteeeve
    @yeahsteeeve 5 дней назад

    Purchased a suppressor locally on a Saturday. Had it in my hand on the following Tuesday.

  • @XrayMike17plus1
    @XrayMike17plus1 9 дней назад +2

    Right now, decent suppressors are still too expensive, and adding a $200 tax stamp on top of that just pours gasoline on a burning fire. Then there's the issue of crossing state lines on top of the add-on BS of transporting in a vehicle, use in defensive situations, local laws, yada yada. Then, there's the multi-cabiber issues, muzzle devices, and adapter issues. Last, what is the likelihood of the ATF showing up at my door if I have tax-stamped items versus if I don't.

  • @GreatKingCody
    @GreatKingCody 9 дней назад +1

    They're worried because 300,000 tasers were considered "in common use" by the courts. Now there is absolutely no reason suppressors should be in the NFA and regulated.

    • @np4057
      @np4057 9 дней назад

      I’m not sure that logic tracks. Though I agree they should just be able to be bought off the shelf (so should any gun,) I can’t see them correlating common use to deregulation. It will help prove common use in states that outright ban suppressors.

  • @therealpeterburke
    @therealpeterburke 9 дней назад +1

    Well, I've been waiting over 60 days for the two I bought in early September. Not all of these take "3 days" $2500 sitting in the back room of my FFL.

  • @KM_1983
    @KM_1983 9 дней назад +2

    They were going to vote 2 different times for the Hearing Protection Act…
    1 time the Republican baseball game was shot up that morning
    2nd Time… Las Vegas shooting happened day before

    • @mbagwell2607
      @mbagwell2607 9 дней назад

      @@KM_1983 what a terrible coincidence

  • @Schregger
    @Schregger 9 дней назад +1

    I dont own any NFA items because of my current living situation. I dont think deregulation will happen before I get that resolved, but its still likely to be a close thing.

  • @ratshave4748
    @ratshave4748 9 дней назад +2

    i am NOT buying a suppressor and supporting the ATF financially

  • @jagpilotohio
    @jagpilotohio 7 дней назад +1

    I Still have 2 pending. 16 1/2 months now. I’ve written 2 emails and they keep saying they are “delayed”. Infuriating

  • @rogerpeters2671
    @rogerpeters2671 9 дней назад +1

    Oh man, I love your new intro. It’s amazing. Good job, my friend.

  • @TheStickinator
    @TheStickinator 7 дней назад +1

    Woohoo I did my part.
    Mine took over 1 year to go through.

  • @champ5316
    @champ5316 9 дней назад +2

    Head rolls, eye rolls, hand movements and suggesting we pay for a Right says it all about him/them.

  • @LukeCrawford-n7n
    @LukeCrawford-n7n 8 дней назад

    I'm in the UK and I own multiple .22 suppressors. There are unfortunately restrictions on who can sell, but not who can buy and some companies even deliver directly by getting every driver registered as a licenced firearms dealer.

  • @BigAirr.
    @BigAirr. 8 дней назад

    well done everyone seriously it warms my heart to see this!

  • @CZ49
    @CZ49 4 дня назад

    Screw the Mufflers. LOUD AND PROUD

  • @vaejoviscarolinanus
    @vaejoviscarolinanus 9 дней назад

    My first suppressor was 2 years and 2 weeks. After I got my UPIN I was approved for 2 in 24 hours. Suppressors are like tattoos you can’t get just one.

  • @bblwarrantydepartment981
    @bblwarrantydepartment981 9 дней назад +2

    Nj gun owner here. Let’s go!

  • @justing7631
    @justing7631 9 дней назад

    I submitted two Form 4's in October. Takes longer with my gun trust, but should be approved any day now. Got two SBR's to register soon as well. The process through Silencer Shop is dead easy once you've got everything set up.

  • @jasoncw1440
    @jasoncw1440 9 дней назад

    I can attest to the quick times being approved. I've bought 4 since January. 2 of them were approved in 24 hrs. 1 approved in 48 hrs and my last one that got approved yesterday took 12 days.

  • @gregz4249
    @gregz4249 9 дней назад +2

    This will make it harder for them to give up the income

  • @fomocore
    @fomocore 9 дней назад +2

    Can you imagine how many select fire would be on the registry now!