These are the greatest paintings I've ever seen. I had no idea that such a thing was possible, and the effect makes them about a million times more enjoyable to look at than literally any other painting, regardless of what is being painted lol. Unbelievable..
You sir, are the living embodiment of the label “a life fulfilled”. Not only did you invent a whole new genre of art based on a genius idea, but the way you talk about it in such a down-to-earth and happy manner makes me think that you’re probably a thoroughly nice bloke in real life. Good on you, Patrick.
technically the first reverse perspective painting was far before patrick hughes all the way back in the byzantine era but those were static 2d images just with reverse perspective (close things are bigger far things are smaller) but patrick hughes' paintings are moving
@@andrewternet8370 yeah thats what im talking about also orthographic predates inverse perspective and regular perspective im pretty sure tho im not sure about inverse perspective predating regular perspective i found a old inverse perspective painting from 1,250 on wikipedia (Italo-Byzantinischer Maler des 13. Jahrhunderts 001,jpg) but WAY older regular perspective paintings on wikipedia all the way back to 31,000 BC ("Paintings from the Chauvet cave (museum replica),jpg") tho they look more like some sort of oblique projection to me tho "Cubiculum (bedroom) from the Villa of P. Fannius Synistor at Boscoreale MET DP170950,jpg" (from 50-40 BC) looks more like regular perspective (aka linear perspective or just perspective)also i just copy and pasted the file names and thats why they have ,jpg
Your work both confuses and angers me. Just subscribed because I absolutely love it. I can't wait to see more. Thank you for your contribution to the world.
Love Patrick's work but am somewhat confused at some apparent double-standards going on here; on his website he lambasts and verbally insults artists who copy his basic design, calling them 'farts, nitwits and fools', even going so far as to sue them for 'fat fees'. However this video spends a significant portion of its duration showing Patrick defending his practice of using other artists' images in his work. I've always believed in the saying "imitation is the sincerest form of flattery" and have never sued people who have copied my works. I could understand Patrick's reaction if his name was being used by other people in 'forgeries' of his artwork, but a basic, geometrical concept shouldn't be able to be copyrighted and - I'm sure Patrick would agree - people who buy cheap knock-offs of his work are never going to be able to afford the real thing and people who CAN afford the real thing would never buy a knock-off.
The basis for his complaint seems to be the lack of accreditation to his "idea", but the name calling and self-aggrandizing pride he displays while defending his brilliance smacks of total jackassery.
He isn't ripping off their work as they are already established pieces within his art, for example the Damion Hurst Shark in a Tank. He hasn't ripped it off because he's used a different medium to represent it which hasn't used it's exclusivity (the fact that it's a real shark). With Patrick Hughes, this is his signature work, reverse perspective is how you recognise a Patrick Hughes piece and when other people use it, they are copying his work. If someone put their unmade bed in a gallery they could be seen as ripping off Tracy Emin, it could be a completely different style bed, however the idea was hers. (not that I'm a fan of it) I guess art is always subjective and I personally would be irritated if someone used my unique thing.
I agree with that he's not copying Damian Hurst but this optical illusion makes me remember many other "unique ideas" like the anonymous "infinite mirror" which many people in youtube is copying for profit or mere fun. I like this work as an kind of Escher exercise.
Por una de estas pinturas yo estaria dispuesto a pagar muchos millones de dolares, es increíble la admiracion que este artista inspira a travez de la belleza y complejidad de su arte, desde un lugar muy Humilde tieme un nuevo fanatico, saludos desde Republica Dominicana 🇩🇴
The first time I saw this kind of work was on TV many years ago. It was a painting of windows, I was amazed, couldn't get it out of my head, so I had to find it. @Patrick Hughes: Do you sell your work?
this is the opposite of real life in real life far away things appear to move less when you and and close up things appear to move more but in the painting far away things move more but close up things move less
That's stupid. Do your research first. The Islamic era was the first to bring a studied approach to perspective and optics, and were the first to implement perspective in art, long before the year ~1614 as you suggest. I would have also accepted the possibility of the Greeks, as the Islamic revolution expounded on much of the works of the Greeks, what the Greeks hadn't really developed much. This is just another example of the "attribute everything innovative to the Renaissance, an era that was directly inspired by the Muslims, but was covered up/hidden by the Europeans and later the Americans as a way of inflating their egos and maintaining Government worship."
your response is even less accurate. as much as the egyptians, greeks and arab scholars progressed forms of perspective, Brunelleschi devised linear perspective. don't make this political.
It is so original art, the reverse perspective that is optical illusion, but still the way we see space with our own eyes. Just absolutely briliant.
These are the greatest paintings I've ever seen. I had no idea that such a thing was possible, and the effect makes them about a million times more enjoyable to look at than literally any other painting, regardless of what is being painted lol. Unbelievable..
You sir, are the living embodiment of the label “a life fulfilled”. Not only did you invent a whole new genre of art based on a genius idea, but the way you talk about it in such a down-to-earth and happy manner makes me think that you’re probably a thoroughly nice bloke in real life. Good on you, Patrick.
Unless I'm wrong, inverse perspective predates regular perspective. Just look at Orthodox iconography- they still use inverse perspective today.
technically the first reverse perspective painting was far before patrick hughes all the way back in the byzantine era but those were static 2d images just with reverse perspective (close things are bigger far things are smaller) but patrick hughes' paintings are moving
@@andrewternet8370 yeah thats what im talking about also orthographic predates inverse perspective and regular perspective im pretty sure tho im not sure about inverse perspective predating regular perspective i found a old inverse perspective painting from 1,250 on wikipedia (Italo-Byzantinischer Maler des 13. Jahrhunderts 001,jpg) but WAY older regular perspective paintings on wikipedia all the way back to 31,000 BC ("Paintings from the Chauvet cave (museum replica),jpg") tho they look more like some sort of oblique projection to me tho "Cubiculum (bedroom) from the Villa of P. Fannius Synistor at Boscoreale MET DP170950,jpg" (from 50-40 BC) looks more like regular perspective (aka linear perspective or just perspective)also i just copy and pasted the file names and thats why they have ,jpg
Your work both confuses and angers me. Just subscribed because I absolutely love it. I can't wait to see more. Thank you for your contribution to the world.
Very down to earth for having created such imaginary and imaginative works.
Love Patrick's work but am somewhat confused at some apparent double-standards going on here; on his website he lambasts and verbally insults artists who copy his basic design, calling them 'farts, nitwits and fools', even going so far as to sue them for 'fat fees'. However this video spends a significant portion of its duration showing Patrick defending his practice of using other artists' images in his work. I've always believed in the saying "imitation is the sincerest form of flattery" and have never sued people who have copied my works.
I could understand Patrick's reaction if his name was being used by other people in 'forgeries' of his artwork, but a basic, geometrical concept shouldn't be able to be copyrighted and - I'm sure Patrick would agree - people who buy cheap knock-offs of his work are never going to be able to afford the real thing and people who CAN afford the real thing would never buy a knock-off.
The basis for his complaint seems to be the lack of accreditation to his "idea", but the name calling and self-aggrandizing pride he displays while defending his brilliance smacks of total jackassery.
He isn't ripping off their work as they are already established pieces within his art, for example the Damion Hurst Shark in a Tank. He hasn't ripped it off because he's used a different medium to represent it which hasn't used it's exclusivity (the fact that it's a real shark). With Patrick Hughes, this is his signature work, reverse perspective is how you recognise a Patrick Hughes piece and when other people use it, they are copying his work.
If someone put their unmade bed in a gallery they could be seen as ripping off Tracy Emin, it could be a completely different style bed, however the idea was hers. (not that I'm a fan of it)
I guess art is always subjective and I personally would be irritated if someone used my unique thing.
I agree with that he's not copying Damian Hurst but this optical illusion makes me remember many other "unique ideas" like the anonymous "infinite mirror" which many people in youtube is copying for profit or mere fun. I like this work as an kind of Escher exercise.
@@LivvyOrangeJuiceDrinkDouglas reversed perspective was not created by him, it's a very old discovery you know
@@denni95HM of course it wasn't created by him, HOW he does it, however, was.
A truly amazing work !!. Impressive level of detail and quality
You are a genius sir. Respect.
Wow! This just blows my mind.
Por una de estas pinturas yo estaria dispuesto a pagar muchos millones de dolares, es increíble la admiracion que este artista inspira a travez de la belleza y complejidad de su arte, desde un lugar muy Humilde tieme un nuevo fanatico, saludos desde Republica Dominicana 🇩🇴
Wonderful, you have created a new appreciation of art. If ever you create/manufacture for the mass market I would love to know.
The first time I saw this kind of work was on TV many years ago. It was a painting of windows, I was amazed, couldn't get it out of my head, so I had to find it. @Patrick Hughes: Do you sell your work?
Beautiful!!!
AMAZING!
I love this Video.
Happy Birthday!
Amazing work
Amazing.
Magnifiques oeuvres visibles au POPA (Porrentruy Optical Art) à Porrentruy, Jura, Switzerland
Amazing. Doing a school project on him :)
very nice :))
Respekt 😍😍😍😍
A Patrick Hughes retro(per)spective
the music at the end is great ! How could I find it? What's the name of it?
music good.
this is the opposite of real life in real life far away things appear to move less when you and and close up things appear to move more but in the painting far away things move more but close up things move less
Anyone have god's phone number? There's a glitch in the system
can we purchase one of these? Please contact me.
Hello patrick....Very nice my friend ......see my 3d drawing
First comment? 1,229 views???? I am going to change that!
That's stupid. Do your research first. The Islamic era was the first to bring a studied approach to perspective and optics, and were the first to implement perspective in art, long before the year ~1614 as you suggest. I would have also accepted the possibility of the Greeks, as the Islamic revolution expounded on much of the works of the Greeks, what the Greeks hadn't really developed much. This is just another example of the "attribute everything innovative to the Renaissance, an era that was directly inspired by the Muslims, but was covered up/hidden by the Europeans and later the Americans as a way of inflating their egos and maintaining Government worship."
your response is even less accurate. as much as the egyptians, greeks and arab scholars progressed forms of perspective, Brunelleschi devised linear perspective. don't make this political.