@@carlosdanger1843 Dr Fauci is a infectious disease expert abd while he undoubtedly knows the science of evolutionary biology there are experts that could explain it better.
@@carlosdanger1843 it’s Fauci. Not Fauchi. At least get his name right. Also - he actually IS a well credentialed scientist. His MD is from Cornell - he graduated first in his class. Do you know how hard that is? What are your credentials? Do you have a terminal science degree? Additionally - the Fauci comment is a pivot from the real issue - that neither of these two idiots know anything about biology, geology, or any other scientific discipline.
@@joshuatoro8977 Kirk Cameron and Ken Ham are spreading false information about science and the result is uninformed viewers. They both promote and ignorance about basic science. That is a disservice to the community. There are some excellent nooks on evolution, from Stephen Jay Gould and Richard Dawkins.
The Mount St. Helens eruption and what has happened around it since proves that it doesn’t take millions of years to create something like the Grand Canyon
Dr Steve Austin and the RATE team, who dated the Mt St Helens eruption, deliberately used the wrong logarithm to produce false results. Their claims were debunked immediately.
Most of the Christians I know with my level of scientific knowledge and understanding of paleontology, archaeology, anthropology, biology, and astronomy are old earth creationists. I am a young earth creationist, and I don't see the need to confirm the Bible to a secular worldview when there are many possible explanations that allow one to interpret the scientific observations into a biblical worldview. I sometimes also call myself a six day creationist explaining that I don't know the scientific processes that occurred in those six days, but it makes God deceptive to the people who heard him utter the words, "for in six days the Lord made the heavens, the earth, the sea, and all that is in them," if he didn't do it. When Moses spoke that to the Israelites he specifically connected it to their literal work week for the Sabbath, so it's absurd to suggest that the Israelites thought he meant, "for in six arbitrary periods of time." I also explain to others that while creationists have different possible explanations, there could be other explanations, and that these are simply the best possible explanations we have that fit with the biblical story. I find people are more open to the possibility of a younger earth when you explain to them that God can create a star and its light, so we don't need to wait 14 billion years, and also most creationists have no problem with God being able to create a star like the sun from nothing, so why should they have a problem with the rest of the universe? The implications of time dilation, the curse of the world after Adam and Eve sinned, Noah's flood, and other things can all be plausible explanations for the observable evidence.
@@guineapigsith699 That and similar explanations revolving around plate tectonics with the flood make a lot of sense. I don't like to push any one hyoothesis as true, but certainly the Flood as the catalyst makes a lot of sense. It's certainly a much better explanation for the sudden loss of the dinosaurs, the rapid fossilization of them, and the apparent flooding of dinosaurs worldwide than the asteroid theory. The fundamental flaw with the asteroid theory is everything but the dinosaurs being more or less unaffected. If there was an asteroid impact as destructive as they believe, then everything from plants and trees to reptiles should have been wiped out, but that's not at all what they claim.
@@litigioussociety4249 It's impossible for the earth to be young. Daughter isotopes with half-lives in excess of a billion years cannot exist in an environment that is only a few thousand years old. If you knew as much science as you claim then you'd be a theistic evolutionist. Or just evolutionist.
@@speciesspeciate6429 It depends on what is meant by "young earth." For example, there is the time dilation theory that says the mass of the universe crested on day 4 would actually have caused 14 billion years to be experienced by the universe in the time they earth experienced one day. Other similar theories posit that eons of erosion, decay, formation etc. could have occurred in minutes by an omnipotent creator. For example, the idea of a powerful person being able to cause an acorn to grow into an oak tree in a moment would be able to make the oak tree still grow rings like normal. There is also the matter of last thursdayism. Most people assume when God created something like the sun, it was like the sun we see now, not a nebula of gas that had to form into the sun, or a much younger sun that had a higher hydrogen to helium ratio that would have to wait billions of years to be aged to where it is now. Likewise, the moon being made at its approximate current distance, which works out perfect for total solar eclipses and annulars. The point is there are several ways of explaining the different ages assigned to things by secular science.
@@Bomtombadi1 Now I regret doing the drop down just to find that you had already taken the words out of my mouth. He’s as much of a doctor as conman Kent Hovind is. These people are so gullible.
There is a simple answer to the question of "How can all of the different people have come from two?" That answer is a couple questions to the atheist, "you believe that ALL life comes from one cell, which miraculously gave itself life. How can ALL life be from ONE cell? Wouldn't that make all kinds of anomalies and defects?
Atheist here. I don't exactly understand any of your three questions. 1. "you believe that ALL life comes from one cell, which miraculously gave itself life" Are you suggesting that we think that a cell somehow first had to exist and it then gave itself life? 2. "How can ALL life be from ONE cell?" Are you thinking that we believe one single cell gave rise to one life form, then it gave rise to another different life form, and then another? 3. "Wouldn't that make all kinds of anomalies and defects?" Do you believe we think that all mutations are deleterious?
The answer is quite simple it's an allegory a biblical story no different than the Prodigal Son just like the Eucharist it shouldn't be taken literally
@@rolandwatts3218 If two people could not make all people then how can ONE cell make ALL of life, especially when the cell was not alive originally? How did the cell "give itself" life? (That is far more preposterous than believing in Adam and Eve and also statistically impossible). If only two humans would make all kinds of anomalies then why wouldn't one cell do the same?
@@felixramos1608 The prodigal son is an *allegory* and Jesus frequently used allegory to illustrate spiritual principles. The creation account is just that, and *account* AKA a re-TELLING of a story of what actually happened.
I fully agree with Ken Ham. I used to think the global flood was only rising water, but that never explained why other boats did not survive. The flood was violent in ways that reshaped the planet. Anthracite coal is made from buried forests, if that process occurred gradually the trees would have decayed as happens with all organic matter that is exposed to oxygen.
Anthracite coal is currently being made as we speak at numerous places around the Earth, and there is not a global flood currently happening, at least not that I am aware of. Ham and Cameron have been indoctrinated into believing nonsense.
Dinner is served? Seriously, do you know how much coal was made by the global flood? Whatever coal is being produced today pales in comparison. There is deep coal beds in the ocean south of Australia and into Antarctica! Jesus gave the global flood as an example of the sudden destruction which will come upon the earth. That's why I believe in the global flood - since I was a child. "For as in those days before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day when Noah entered the ark, and they were unaware until the flood came and swept them all away, so will be the coming of the Son of Man.' Matthew 24:38-39
@@timothykeith1367 Besides the little fact that there was no global flood, and the Bible is mythology and folklore, at best. Those little facts tend to elude you guys. If a flood caused coal deposits, why aren’t they only an inch or two thick, which is what would happen if a flood killed a forest. It’s because they formed over millions of years of of plants dying and adding matter by shedding leaves and continually adding more matter to the deposits. Every single thing that these indoctrinated morons spout about geology, is wrong.
As someone who has visited the Grand Canyon in person, I highly recommend visiting! Absolutely breathtaking! Only a mighty Creator could create something like that!
I'm 66 & a lifetime Catholic. I've never been told or encouraged to read the Bible. I recently developed a real hunger to KNOW for myself what's in the Bible. I have begin reading it with a Bible Study group-different religions. I would venture to say that those who are athiests or even those who want to argue every little thing in the Bible--that none of them has ever really read the Bible.
They would likely point out that the Coconino sandstone layer is an eolian deposit, not from some flood. Ken Ham never does explain how post-flood Cenozoic fossils form. In their debate, Bill Nye brought up the point that all fossils would be jumbled up in a flood and that is not what we see. For some strange reason we only find stegasaurus in late Jurassic deposits and Quetzalcoatl in Late Cretaceous.
@@ShoestringRacer If I were a better person that's how I'd live my life now. It's going to be such a relief leaving all this toil and ingratitude behind. I hope to see you there, Racer!
let me ask everyone at comments on here or read this what are you guys think of TBN I was raised to believe that they were some crackpot TV show or studio producing place but I see Kirk Cameron someone I really trust in the Christian faith and it really rocks my own faithful what I think about TBN anyone have answers to help me with this?
we have stories, where someone found whales buried vertically in many strata in Peru and California. There had to be a catastrophic event, such as Noah's Flood. If we look at the strata, we see layers of sediment settled at different rates, which is due to the type of strata. We test soil samples by making a slurry and watch what settles. Clay seems to settle on the bottom first. where as loomy soil tends to settle last.
Between the Old Testament and the book of Enochthis story is clear! Satan was corrupting the dna of mankind in order to try prohibit a savior. There were angels giants ruling men and woman and teaching sorcery and demon worship! God had to destroy them to save mankind it was not unjust it was actually gracious in order to save His creation.
@@Bomtombadi1 they do, and what's with the gay pet names? Do your research before you go calling other dudes cupcake and making ignorant statements haha
@@Bomtombadi1 the burden of proof falls to you. The Cambrian explosion is a time period in which ALL SPECIES come into existence. Fossil records, carbon dating, all that proves it. The fossils, however, do not show evolution or its process. Fire back "cupcake". Freaking fruit basket
@@dennisprow7576 no, cupcake. That’s not when ALL species come into existence. There are pre-Cambrian fossils, too. Carbon dating proves all species came into existence? That’s a new one! So are we to find elephants and bunnies and birdies in the Cambrian? Lol - I need to do MY research? This is too cute.
@@dennisprow7576 Hey Dennis, since you like to use the scientific discovery of the Cambrian explosion... Do you happen to know how long that "explosion" lasted?
“Animals” were villagers in the City where Noah lived. 😶 “Separating clean and unclean animals” 😶 That was Noah using virtue and interacting with villagers
Our lives on Earth are all LEND/BORROWED from God... we never SIGNED any contract neither BOUGHT nor CHOSE the LIVES that we wanted but it was FREELY GIVEN... Analogy/for example... a Neighbor lends his BIKE to you... You could use it to the fullest of any purpose it might serve, but you also have the duties and responsibilities to protect the Bike from being MARKED. DAMAGED, repaired, or destroyed, for any moment the Owner of the Bike can take it back "AS IS." even w/o your approval... the same analogy with our LIVES... here today and gone tomorrow... but with the HOPE and FAITH of Everlasting Life with God after Death of the Flesh... Amen.
According to Genesis 10:25 and 1 Chronicles 1:19, it was during the time of Peleg that the earth was divided - traditionally, this is often assumed to be just before, during, or after the failure of the Tower of Babel, whose construction was traditionally attributed to Nimrod.
We have NO RIGHT to judge/accuse/condemn God of being UNJUST for sending the Great Flood in Noah's Days... God is the maker and giver of LIFE, therefore, God has the right to take back what are His... no question asked... We NEVER SIGNED any contract neither BOUGHT nor CHOSE the life that God gave us... it was FREELY GIVEN by God, therefore, GOD has the RIGHT to FREELY take it BACK... We definitely do not need the I.Q. of Einstein to understand and comprehend this matter unless we have a very poor low I.Q... Amen.
@@billaitken2989 God the creator of everything, visible and invisible, has the "Sole RIGHT" to GIVE and TAKE lives... Murder is not a RIGHT, but a CRIME, in both God's Law and Man's Law... Human Parents have no RIGHT to take the lives (ABORTION) of their unborn children for they themselves are only created by GOD... in fact, ALL Humans have no RIGHT to take lives... God allowed the Government Authority Powered by/for/of the People to take a life if the crime was committed, given a fair trial, and proven without any reasonable doubt that the person committed a capital crime, that deserves the DEATH penalty,... God allowed also the Government Authority Powered by/for/of the People to Wage WAR if another Nation tries to invade their own Country and take AWAY over God-given Human FREEDOM... which includes SELF-DEFENCE... God also allowed the Doctors to remove/terminate the pregnancy "ONLY IF" found a "Terminal Medical Health" issue/case that will be in dangering the life of the Mother... RAPE or INCEST is not allowed by God to be aborted, but the infant/baby upon born may be legally adopted by a Married Hetero Couple without children of their own... Facts and Truth, Biblically and Legally speaking...
@@billaitken2989 Our LIFE on Earth is just a "LIMITED FREE BORROWED LIFE" from God... When you were born, did you PAY any SORT of amount to God, that you can say, "I BOUGHT THIS LIFE, I OWNED THIS LIFE OF MINE, I CAN DO WHATEVER I WANT TO MY BODY AND TO MY LIFE?"... Nope, NOBODY does... Therefore, it is a LIMITED FREE BORROWED LIFE we have on Earth... Can God take it back ANYTIME GOD WANTS IT?... Definitely, YES for sure 100%... God gave us FREEWILL to choose Good or Evil but with attached CONSEQUENCES... to choose GOOD and you will be REWARDED,... or to choose EVIL and you will be PUNISHED whether here on Earth thru the Authority of the Government that God allowed to established on Earth or if you escape the punishment on Earth, then on the Afterlife of ETERNAL PUNISHMENT in Hell, without parole... nothing escapes JUSTICE from the hands of God... God is FAIR and JUST... and God moves at HIS OWN RIGHT TIME, and not our own right time. God also allowed all Human Beings living on Earth (while still alive) to be TESTED/TEMPTED by Satan/Devil, who brought injustices, unfairness, inequality, sadness, illness, suffering (mental, physical, and emotional), and death to the innocents... why?... For God to know, if the People especially the Christians, "LOVE" God above all, even after we suffered great things from Satan (Devil), just like the story of JOB... Analogy... in school most often our Teachers give extra POINTS to those who do extra curriculum activities that could elevate our Class Standing of Honorolls... the same analogy... that is as an extra REWARDS from God on Earth or in Heaven... if God is pleased on us in spite of the sufferings we have been through and endures it without cursing, blaming and renouncing God, 100x our rewards in Heaven, and sometimes given on Earth... When Job did not curse, blame and renounce God in spite of all the suffering he endured from Satan/Devil, such as all his Family being wipe-out died, all his properties being lost, and unbearable skin diseases/sores/itches all over his body including his face (living corpse)... God, healed him and rewarded Job with a longer life to have a New Family, New Children, and his properties are 100X bigger than the ones he lost... For me, if ever I deserved to have a REWARD from God, I pray, it will be given to me in Heaven, where "moths and robbers" can not steal it from me and stay there eternally... Facts and Truth, Biblically speaking... Amen
DNA allows us to estimate the original minimal herd that generates a population. Humanity is not compatible with a single pair we descend from. So much for Adam and Eve. But we knew that. Where could Kain find a wife otherwise?
Our LIFE on Earth is just a "LIMITED FREE BORROWED LIFE" from God... When you were born, did you PAY any SORT of amount to God, that you can say, "I BOUGHT THIS LIFE, I OWNED THIS LIFE OF MINE, I CAN DO WHATEVER I WANT TO MY BODY AND TO MY LIFE?"... Nope, NOBODY does... Therefore, it is a LIMITED FREE BORROWED LIFE we have on Earth... Can God take it back ANYTIME GOD WANTS IT?... Definitely, YES for sure 100%... God gave us FREEWILL to choose Good or Evil but with attached CONSEQUENCES... to choose GOOD and you will be REWARDED,... or to choose EVIL and you will be PUNISHED whether here on Earth thru the Authority of the Government that God allowed to established on Earth or if you escape the punishment on Earth, then on the Afterlife of ETERNAL PUNISHMENT in Hell, without parole... nothing escapes JUSTICE from the hands of God... God is FAIR and JUST... and God moves at HIS OWN RIGHT TIME, and not our own right time. God also allowed all Human Beings living on Earth (while still alive) to be TESTED/TEMPTED by Satan/Devil, who brought injustices, unfairness, inequality, sadness, illness, suffering (mental, physical, and emotional), and death to the innocents... why?... For God to know, if the People especially the Christians, "LOVE" God above all, even after we suffered great things from Satan (Devil), just like the story of JOB... Analogy... in school most often our Teachers give extra POINTS to those who do extra curriculum activities that could elevate our Class Standing of Honorolls... the same analogy... that is as an extra REWARDS from God on Earth or in Heaven... if God is pleased on us in spite of the sufferings we have been through and endures it without cursing, blaming and renouncing God, 100x our rewards in Heaven, and sometimes given on Earth... When Job did not curse, blame and renounce God in spite of all the suffering he endured from Satan/Devil, such as all his Family being wipe-out died, all his properties being lost, and unbearable skin diseases/sores/itches all over his body including his face (living corpse)... God, healed him and rewarded Job with a longer life to have a New Family, New Children, and his properties are 100X bigger than the ones he lost... For me, if ever I deserved to have a REWARD from God, I pray, it will be given to me in Heaven, where "moths and robbers" can not steal it from me and stay there eternally... Facts and Truth, Biblically speaking... Amen
@@dross4207 He was quoting God's word, and God's word also tells us that faith is a gift of God. I believe what he quoted is to be understood as in, doing something in faith vrs. against one's conscience ( as spoken about by Paul in writings about the "weaker brother" ) &/OR in one's flesh/for self, not God ( all our righteousness is as filthy rags). As for what you're saying, how do u know ? I'm guessing you have in mind the times people end up believing in untrue things, due to faith vrs. evidence, facts, truth. But even a stopped clock tells the correct time twice a day. One can not know all of the evidence, facts and truth AND, for other reasons end up at the truth. I can passionately believe that my family member is innocent of the criminal charges against them, based on my faith in them, and end up being justified OR not. In the case of God, Abraham believed God and it was credited to him for righteousness" . Wether or not God existed wasn't the issue, that was obvious to Abraham. It was whether or not God was trustworthy and infallible. We, wether we know it or not, have only the same issue. The position you're coming from, I'm guessing, is the from the idea that we're all justifiably beginning at the question of a Creator even existing and the Bible being His word/true. Abraham wasn't raised on all of the ignorance and lies of today, and in his willingness to love and serve his Creator, had grown into an undeniable personal relationship with Him, so, he didn't have that hang-up. We needn't have it either, so, it's no excuse. I mean, we can't help it if we were raised ignorant of all of the facts and evidence and reasonableness - above any other conclusion and belief- for knowing we have a Creator and the Bible is His trustworthy word to us, but that doesn't make it not true and most of us can find that out sooner than later, if we were only willing to. So, thus, we really are, whether we know it or not, all in the same position as Abraham. Down to the choice of our free will, to choose to trust God, or not. The same issue presented to Adam and Eve, even in their innocence and perfection, & in a perfect environment. The fact we have a free will and must use it. Unlike Adam and Eve, we have started out corrupt and Spiritually dead and with even more lies of Satan. But God is there to help anyone who's "willing to receive the love of the truth" & willing to repent from serving self, and turn to Him in surrender. That is choosing faith, which He gives to all who are willing to surrender to their Creator. To choose rightful submission to His rightful authority. To be willing to, if indeed He does exist and is good, and are willing to be shown that He is, it indeed He is. Those who grasp that that is only right, that anything else is wicked, arrogant treason. Many people the world over, throughout history, have come to the gist of this understanding, without knowing all of the rest, and have been blessed in their willingness to repent from self-worship and serve God instead, without even having the Bible in their possession or all of the evidence for it or any of the learned, scientific discoveries and information proving the Bible true again and again. They weren't blinded by pride and puffed up by man's knowledge, so were able to hear the still, small voice of God speaking to their spirits. Yes, one can fall for a false god, too. God is able, however, to provide for and protect all who want truth, want Him. Either keep them from it in the 1st place, or send someone with the Bible etc. to provide for them the lacking knowledge to weed out the false doctrines, the false teachers, the deceiving spirits. God is faithful ! We can snd should trust Him, because He IS trust-WORTHY. Trust Him and see, it's the only way to KNOW.
@@ajb.822 For one thing, you don’t know whose word, if anyone at all, that he was quoting. No one has ever shown God, or any god for that matter, to be real or exist. Faith has ALWAYS been a terrible way to come to truth. That was true then, and remains true today. Of course you can be right on faith alone, but that doesn’t make it rational to believe that you are right on faith alone. Someone can have faith that a three legged leprechaun exists, and they could be right, but that doesn’t make it rational to believe that they are right. That’s the category that gods belong in. They have never been shown to exist, they are fantastical, wizard like beings, and they have never given a single answer to any unknown, and with natural explanations being responsible for 100% of what is known, there is no indication that anything ever will have an explanation that is otherwise.
We have always homeschooled and use biblical science - including the Answers in Genesis - and we have learned all of this. My kids love and believe the Bible and Noah’s flood was real
Also, prior to the flood the earth was very congenial to life - no clouds, water came up through the earth, moderate climate, etc. plus people lived for 700-900+ years - Adam 930 years old. After the flood the earth was more hostile; clouds, rain, heat, cold, elevation changes, etc. Therefore the earth changed during the flood.
How did Noah get all the animals back to their various countries of origin after the ark came to rest in Turkey? How did he even manage to assemble them in the first place?
How can Kirk Cameron say he's a born again Christian, when he's appeared numerous times on TBN, which is a network founded by Pau; and Jan Crouch, who claom to be little gods? I would question Kirk's Chrisrianity intemsely.
I admire Kirk's body of work in spreading the gospel, but am a bit disturbed that he has given Ken Ham a forum to express his personal interpretation of the Bible through his geology of the Grand Canyon hubris without challenge. The "flood geology" used to advance the young earth interpretation focuses on river beds, deltas, coral reefs and other areas that most secular geologists agree are only tens of thousands of years old, but abundant proof exists of a much older earth. Ken speaks eloquently; however, he and his young earth acolytes claim that both Biblical literalism (interpret literally where possible) and science prove their interpretation of Genesis. But, when pressed to the point where the supposed science doesn’t support their hermeneutic, they default to 2 Peter 3 and claim a prophetic vision that Peter had of the "coming of evolutionist theory through uniformitarianism." They then create division within the church by labeling devout Christians who believe in an older earth as "uniformitarianists", and attack their fellow believers by accusing them of siding with evolutionist atheists. In doing so, they blur the the message of salvation in Jesus Christ by tying it to their interpretation of Genesis and they manufacture a straw man war between Biblical literalists and "atheistic" science (If you're not with us, you're against us.). Because Ken's young earth hermeneutic requires distilling the entire Bible through the crucible of Genesis 1, the young earth position is strung together as though attempting to work a crossword puzzle when the first word chosen is wrong. In defending a 6,000 year old earth, Ken expects we should “strain out a gnat and swallow a camel.”
Lucifer in his Pride Confronted and challenged GOD with doing what Lucifer thought was a Better Way. For Lucifer's arrogance Vanity and Pride as it is today in society GOD JUDGED Them and Cast Them Out of Heaven and Down to a Fallen Earth.
Next week Jack and the Beanstalk.. A talking snake and a man who claims to have lived in the belly of a whale..followed by a woman who turned to turned to salt.. this is hilarious!!
Graham Hankock and Randall Carlson are experts in this field Ken Ham is not. The earth and universe shows signs that they are far older then 12,000 years old. Read books on this subject
Ark Encounter has dinosaurs in cages on the Ark. There are no pterodactyls today. They want you to believe in a form of evolution. I was very disappointed. The Ark they built is turning black from mold? Though it matched a six colored rainbow umbrella with a black sliver they sell. I don’t remember seeing Genesis 7:2 covered at the Ark Encounter.
I like Kirk Cameron and I pray for him. I pray that he changes his views on the series called the chosen. There's a lot wrong with that series. For one thing quite a bit of it is not biblical and neither are the people in it. But he praises it and says why not let's give the Bible a different outlook. Something to that effect he said. Kurt get back to biblical principles.
Well I am not a pagan, but I am an atheist. I certainly care about the lives of others. And I have come across pagans on a few forums and they have never struck me as folk who don't care about other people.
@@rolandwatts3218 The point is Roland you'd have no conception of the value of human life if it weren't for God crafting it into the human psyche through the Hebrews and then Christ. The Bible is the account of the process God used to force us out of our natural inclinations and into a condition where human life is valuable. Remember, every pre-Biblical civilisation practised human sacrifice. Abraham and Isaac is the account of God teaching man to give up child sacrifice.
@@guineapigsith699 //The point is Roland you'd have no conception of the value of human life if it weren't for God crafting it into the human psyche through the Hebrews and then Christ.// How do you know that? //The Bible is the account of the process God used to force us out of our natural inclinations and into a condition where human life is valuable.// Jephthah's daughter did not seem to be too valuable. Neither did Lot's daughters. //... every pre-Biblical civilisation practised human sacrifice.// How do you know that? (The bible only deals with a limited number of cultures).
@@rolandwatts3218 1) Because the value of human life was a concept that didn't exist in pre-Biblical societies and doesn't exist in post-Biblical societies (see: abortion, eugenics, extermination camps). So the taboo would never have developed. 2) The context of Jephthah's & Lot's daughters is that their deaths are tragic. This context wouldn't exist if it weren't for the lesson of Isaac. Jephthah & Lot were fallen men. You can't hold them up as moral examples, they are moral lessons. The account of the Old Testament is God hammering the same lessons into the Hebrews over and over again, and over and over again they turn away from these lessons and engage in evil. The account of the New Testament is God coming to earth to explain this in person. 3) India, Rome, Greece, America, Polynesia, Europe, China, Australia - all had human sacrifice and/or cannibalism (as ritual or war, not just times of famine). All I could find at a glance about Russia was during USSR but I'd bet it's there in the ancient past if you look for it. What do you say to that?
@@guineapigsith699 //1) Because the value of human life was a concept that didn't exist in pre-Biblical societies and doesn't exist in post-Biblical societies (see: abortion, eugenics, extermination camps). So the taboo would never have developed. // Don't you think humans in pre and post biblical times had or have empathetic senses? It seems to me that, on reading ancient Greek myths for example, that people mourned at the loss of loved ones. I doubt that they would mourn if human life had no value. //The account of the Old Testament is God hammering the same lessons into the Hebrews over and over again, and over and over again they turn away from these lessons and engage in evil.// So why punish the young women, for the things the adults did? Naturally, if the young women had little to no value, they would make good sacrifices, right? //India, Rome, Greece, America, Polynesia, Europe, China, Australia - all had human sacrifice and/or cannibalism ...// I have no doubt that parts of those places practiced these at certain times. As for it being universal in all cultures at all times, I doubt it. //All I could find at a glance about Russia was during USSR but I'd bet it's there in the ancient past if you look for it. // That's possible. There is even evidence that the ancient Hebrews practiced child sacrifice.
So right Dinosaurs were just normal animals 1000 years old. They also went in the Ark as baby animals. Wish I could see your Ark museum. If the atheist were right, today there would have to be trillions of people on the earth.
I recommend that Kirk interview Hugh Ross of Reasons to Believe. He would learn that young earth Biblical interpretation is grievously wrong. He would find out why old earth (but anti-evolution) beliefs are correct.
What is this man speaking about God raised up the mountain and lower the basins? Genesis told us that God divided the waters and so there is water above the heavens. God told us that the heavens were opened and this cause the whole earth to be flooded. After the 40 day and night God with His power restore the water in the heavens and left what is suppose to be on earth in place. Please let us in our conversation always remember that God thought and ways are higher than man and He can do the impossible.
A global flood has been disproved. The flood of Noah is plagiarized from the Epic of Gilgamesh, which is plagiarized from Atra hasis, which is based on the small localized flooding of the Iraqi delta.
Flesh and blood does agree with seen things and hear what others need it seen and science theories, Luke 17:20And when he was demanded of the Pharisees, when the kingdom of God should come, he answered them and said, The kingdom of God cometh not with observation: 21Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you. Plus what did Paul say about OT after he woke from Saul's belief needed looking and seeing is classic christians old wine mixing with unseen new wine, what did female names represent is Allegories called Covenants the unseen one never was history like seen one could be to flesh and blood still looking and waiting for whats IN THEM hiding in your I AM. Noah same meanings in you fulfilled or outside where its shadows of new wine never seen by flesh and blood.
Geologists and such talk about Pangea, and that all the continents came from this one super-continent. I don't believe they're far off. In Genesis 1, it says that all the waters were "gathered in one place and dry land appeared." To me that signifies that all the water was in one place and a giant mass of land appeared - Pangea. And I believe that all the continents we have now were created from this mass of land....by way of the flood. The flood is a result of God separating all the continents. When it says in Genesis 7, it says that "all the fountains of the great deep burst open." Perhaps when God separated the continents, the water of the deep burst open between them, eventually becoming the seas and the oceans that we have today. Just a thought.
The most important thing is that we must understand ourselves as sinful in thoughts, words and deeds and how a Holy, just and righteous God sees us but loves us enough to provide us a way of redemption. Please read: [WHY WE HAVE NO HOPE IN OURSELVES: Mk. 7:20-23 And he (Jesus) said, That which comes out of the man, that defiles the man. For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness: All these evil things (sins) come from within, and defile the man.] [WHY WE NEED A SAVIOR: Rom. 3:10-28 As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one: There is none that understands, there is none that seeks after God. They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is none that does good, no, not one. Their throat is an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips: Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness: Their feet are swift to shed blood: Destruction and misery are in their ways: And the way of peace have they not known: There is no fear of God before their eyes. Now we know that what things so ever the law says, it says to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God. Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his (God's) sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin. But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets; Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ to all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference: For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: Whom God has set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God; To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believes in Jesus. Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? Of works? Nay: but by the law of faith. Therefore we conclude that man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law. Rom. 5:1 Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ:]
Ken says that God-created the world in 6 days , And now he just said that everything after Adam his Adam was good, So how long does it take for animals to have diseases and then die if they only lived 5 days before man?
Death came to the creation after the fall and we do not know exactly how long Adam lived until the fall. Nearly 1600-1700 years of history are summed up in the first six chapters of the Bible. So what is your question?
@@seaknightvirchow8131 He said it only took God 6 days to create the world 6 literal days, Then he said the animals were diseased before man was created so I'm confused
@@randytidmore8021 I think Ken Said that under the evolutionist paradigm, disease and death occurred before the fall but scripture says this came because of the fall. Since the fossils show evidence of disease and death, the fossils came after the fall i.e. Noah’s flood.
@@firstknight117 so you think the story of Noah is real? You think it actually happened? If so Then I am not insulting anyone I am stating a fact. Y’all are bonkers.
It was God and not Noah who prepares all the animals to and unto the Ark. Let us not give Noah or ourselves the credit and not God. God guided Noah to build the Ark along with the material and dimensions in order to obey the law of floatation. God also locked them in or these Giants and mankind would have broken into the Ark during the rising water. God who fed these animals and keep them to live without destroying each other including Noah and his family. Let us give God the credit and not man and Noah.
99.9 % of Christianity is man mad. When Jesus came and preached He spoke a message against the 99.9 of His own people. Not the world. His people. Israel. It's the same today.
Ken, you say, ' Because of sin there are now mutations'. Yet, mutations account for the marvelous diversity of life we see today on our planet. Therefore, our sin in the eyes of our Lord, has led to the diverse array of life on Earth. Was our fall in Eden and His wrathful vengeance part of His plan to create the wonderful world we see today ?
@@melvinhunt6976 Hell ? You christians love living in fear don't you ? Christianity is nothing more than a huge scare tactic to control people...what a way to live.
@@jerrylanglois7892 Not me ! I’m not going there! Your the one with a decision still to make !Ive lived like you (maybe better,maybe worse) and l enjoy my life way Better than before! Have a good night!
Dead things! What a fetish the religious seem to have with dead things. Even Adam ( also dead) is of little significance, other than his sin is for sure the reason over a million babies, four days old or under would be die in the event a most forgiving God decided enough is enough. John Adams was quoted as saying, in defense of representing British soldiers. “I would rather endure the wrath of all mankind, than to see one innocent man die. Thomas Jefferson is my hero, but I really like the above quote by Adams and would like to change some of the words. I would rather endure the wrath of all mankind, than to take pleasure, comfort, or claim salvation, in the death of one innocent man.
so logivcal, excellent, too bad they don't use this excellent knowledge with regards to the 3 is one doctrine. LOL proves that very smart people will belive and say really stupid things lkike 3 is 1.
Honestly, as a science person I lose respect when Christians try to talk science to "prove" things. It might work with your followers, but science people know better. It shows that you don't know much about science. I would have more respect for Christians if they'd just stay away from the science realm and concentrate on their faith. Science and faith are 2 different things and you repel science people when you try to go that route. For what it's worth.
Atheists and every human with any mental awareness or capability, knows what is right & wrong by their "conscience." God gave us "The Natural Law" & the conscience to realize it. The NL is even mentioned in the Bible. Romans 2:14 For when the Gentiles, who do not have the law, do by nature those things which are of the law, such persons, not having the law, are a law unto themselves. 15 For they reveal the work of the law written in their hearts, while their conscience renders testimony about them, and their thoughts within themselves also accuse or even defend them Aquinas: "Natural Law is the same for all men... there is a single standard of truth and right for everyone... which is known by everyone" "Actions are about singular matters: and so it is necessary for the prudent man to know both the universal principles of reason, and the singulars about which actions are concerned" (1265 AD) There are more Cicero: "True law is right reason in agreement with Nature; it is of universal application. Unchanging and everlasting; it summons to duty by its commands and averts from wrongdoing by its prohibitions" (54 BC) The Book of Leviticus has a mention as well.
@@gabepettinicchio7454 You're not taking wilful blindness, ignorance and social conditioning into account. Did your conscience tell you that having anger towards a person is the same as murdering them in your heart?
According to Jesus' Lord's prayer, "Our Father who art in heaven." God is not on earth but still in His perfect world. "Thy kingdom come, thy will be done." We do this by changing our minds to God's will, metanoia. This is a difference between Jesus' teaching and the Old Testament in which God is a puppeteer manipulating life on earth.
God is omnipresent. He’s not just tucked away in His perfect world, He is very much present and working all the time. He holds the whole universe in His mighty, wonderful hands.
@@lorrainewhitehead9080 Even the woefully inadequate "world" that Jesus talked about? “My kingdom is not of this world." "Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. " "For ALL that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." Your love of the world is showing.
@@robertdouglas8895 Let me make it absolutely clear then Robert because you seem to have got the wrong idea, I can’t wait to be eternally with Jesus in the next beautiful, totally sin free world.
The flood was just! God warned people to repent. The world became so wicked. They never choose good. They sacraficed their innocent children to man made gods.....
So innocent children had to die in the flood en masse along with their 'wicked' parents. But the flood was somehow just and not for we mere mortals to question.
@@guineapigsith699 Soft tissue is the name given to anything that isn't bone, and in this case it was collagen. It wasn't soft and gooey, it was as hard as the fossil it was encased in, and it needed to be soaked for weeks in a mild acidic solution before it could even be removed. This issue was resolved 7 years ago. It's preserved by protein cross linking, the release of free radicals in the blood combined with iron acts as a kind of formaldehyde to aid in preservation. The scientist involved, Dr Mary Schweitzer, is a Christian yet she's gone on record saying how upset she is that young earthers are misrepresenting her work to imply young ages. It doesn't. The untreated fossil was carbon dated to satisfy the creationists and the results came back carbon dead because there's no carbon in it, because it's millions of years old. Please stop repeating something that was explained years ago.
You guys can talk all you want about earthly events, but you can never connect those events to an All-knowing, All-powerful, supreme being that lives with a bunch of winged angels in paradise, while a demon (possibly with horns and a pointy tail) waits to torture everyone in a land of fire and brimstone. This premise is not only unbelievable, it's impossible. There are no such things as gods and winged angels and demons. It's time to face reality, Kirk.
Seriously bad stuff. As St Augustine said about 1,500 years ago, this kind of thing makes Christianity look bad. As an atheist, that does not worry me too much but it ought to worry you guys, particularly given that you claim to love truth so much. A couple of points to show just how bad it is. //You don't look at fossils and see evolution, you see dead things ...// That's as silly as saying "You don't look at a fossil and see a flood. You see dead things". //To make a fossil is a catastrophic event ...// Well an organism does have to die first. I guess from the organism’s perspective, that could be deemed to be a catastrophe. But beyond that, we know that it does not necessarily take a catastrophic event for fossils to form. For example, some organisms can die and fall into water that is hostile to other organisms that may destroy the associated bones, allowing them to be covered gradually. Or the organism may fall into a tar pit. Or it may be covered by a drip of resin. Or the event may be catastrophic but have nothing to do with water. For example, the organism may be covered by sand in a wind storm. Or the event may be a catastrophic event but a very localised one. For example, an undersea landslide. We do know that, on average, any dying organism becoming fossilised is very, very, very unlikely. And a fossilised organism remaining in the geologic record to be discovered later, is also very, very unlikely.
It doesn’t worry us Roland. Not. One. Bit. I think it bothers you somehow otherwise you wouldn’t be here watching and commenting so much about something you say doesn’t exist. It really amazes all us Christians why atheists are constantly commenting on Christian channels. It’s just weird. I dint go to atheists pages and talk down to them or insult them so we find it weird that atheists do.
@@deejay7759 //It doesn’t worry us Roland. Not. One. Bit.// Well that is good. //I think it bothers you somehow otherwise you wouldn’t be here watching and commenting so much about something you say doesn’t exist. // It does. I think truth is important. As for commenting on things that don't exist. Missionaries go to other places to effectively comment on things they don't believe exist, namely the God's or gods of other cultures. People often do this kind of thing. //It really amazes all ...// Are you sure all Christians feel the same as you? //... us Christians why atheists are constantly commenting on Christian channels.// Well many of us think that truth is important. And many of us understand just how damaging religious faith can be, and this includes Christianity. //I dint go to atheists pages and talk down to them or insult them so we find it weird that atheists do.// C'mon. Ham ought to know better. Cameron ought to know better. There is plenty of good literature out there explaining how fossils form. It's silly to say that fossilisation requires a catastrophe. I showed how that is not necessarily the case at all and any good text book on the topic will back me up on that.
@@rolandwatts3218 we think truth is important too. We believe the Bible. No need to come rescue us. I’m sure not all Christians agree. I’m not surprised about that at all. Not concerned about it either. They have their own free will and minds to decide for themselves. Doesn’t affect my belief system one way or the other. It’s not worth arguing over. That part doesn’t bother us either. Honestly, if what you believe is truth then Ive really lost nothing. I’ll die and that will be the end if it. It won’t matter if genesis is literal or allegorical. But OH, if what I believe is true then I have so much to gain. That’s all that matters to me. And it still won’t matter if Genesis is literal or not. I think that’s something atheist don’t understand. We have nothing to lose by believing in biblical creation or the Bible as a whole. We have so much to gain.
@@deejay7759 //we think truth is important too.// I know. But it does no harm to do a bit of private research and learn what those who study the process of fossilization actually think. //No need to come rescue us.// Consider me a kind of missionary. :) :) ^^ And I am providing a wee bit of education, free of charge. //Honestly, if what you believe is truth then Ive really lost nothing. I’ll die and that will be the end if it. It won’t matter if genesis is literal or allegorical. But OH, if what I believe is true then I have so much to gain. That’s all that matters to me. And it still won’t matter if Genesis is literal or not. I think that’s something atheist don’t understand. We have nothing to lose by believing in biblical creation or the Bible as a whole. We have so much to gain.// You need to be careful with that. When you die, maybe you will find that the Muslims are correct and you will lose everything. And given that, since the beginning of the faith, Christians have been finger pointing and fighting each other over who is the true Christian and who is the damnable heretic or the wolf in sheep's clothing, then perhaps you will find out that your specific theology is damnable heresy. Or maybe the universalists are correct, and we all make it to heaven. Worse still, if the hyper Calvinists are correct, then maybe God predestined you for hell and myself for heaven - all for his own glory, and for reasons neither of us can discern. ^^ I am not trying to frighten you, but Pascal's Wager as it's often given, is not a good argument at all. Besides, I thought the Christian God required worship in spirit and in truth. If so, then how on earth can such a God be truthfully worshipped on a just-in-case basis? FWIW, all you can do is run with the truth as you best understand it.
The processes you're describing don't account for the vast fossil beds we find. Consider the fossils we do find were drowned as shown by the dramatic spine curvature, and that they must have been buried instantly otherwise the spine curvature would have relaxed.
Ken Hamm is a delight to listen to! Kudos to you Kirk for choosing such great people to interview!
They should interview a real biologist and listen carefully to the science
@@wadenovin2479 like Dr. Fauchi…the kind that follow the science and would never lie or promote an agenda.
Ken and Kurt are bull shit artists
@@carlosdanger1843 Dr Fauci is a infectious disease expert abd while he undoubtedly knows the science of evolutionary biology there are experts that could explain it better.
@@carlosdanger1843 it’s Fauci. Not Fauchi. At least get his name right. Also - he actually IS a well credentialed scientist. His MD is from Cornell - he graduated first in his class. Do you know how hard that is? What are your credentials? Do you have a terminal science degree?
Additionally - the Fauci comment is a pivot from the real issue - that neither of these two idiots know anything about biology, geology, or any other scientific discipline.
Kirk, I just want to say thanks for your witness, thanks for all your doing for the kingdom. God Bless You Sir!
Cameron is doing a great disservice to you
ARE YOU KIDDING ME???? THIS IS UNADULTERATED NONSENSE , SO SNAKES AND DONKEYS CAN TALK??????
@@wadenovin2479 please explain more? I'd like to know more what you're getting at so I can be more informed please and?
@@joshuatoro8977 Kirk Cameron and Ken Ham are spreading false information about science and the result is uninformed viewers. They both promote and ignorance about basic science. That is a disservice to the community. There are some excellent nooks on evolution, from Stephen Jay Gould and Richard Dawkins.
Awesome interview. Thank you Mr. Kirk Cameron...Mr. Ken Ham too.
The Mount St. Helens eruption and what has happened around it since proves that it doesn’t take millions of years to create something like the Grand Canyon
Imagine being so dumb to compare them.
I know, that Washington state Grand Canyon is phenomenal.
Dr Steve Austin and the RATE team, who dated the Mt St Helens eruption, deliberately used the wrong logarithm to produce false results. Their claims were debunked immediately.
And yet, you do not find these ash layers full of fossils. Not even a single one.
You have the best and most interesting guests
AIG and Ken Ham are doing great work!
This is so good! Thank You Ken and Kirk!!
ARE YOU KIDDING ME???? THIS IS UNADULTERATED NONSENSE , SO SNAKES AND DONKEYS CAN TALK??????
Very interesting! And uplifting! Thank you
Very depressing this ignorance gets so much attention
ARE YOU KIDDING ME???? THIS IS UNADULTERATED NONSENSE , SO SNAKES AND DONKEYS CAN TALK??????
Wow! God is so amazing! What a wonderful Jesus came to earth to save our souls 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼
Most of the Christians I know with my level of scientific knowledge and understanding of paleontology, archaeology, anthropology, biology, and astronomy are old earth creationists. I am a young earth creationist, and I don't see the need to confirm the Bible to a secular worldview when there are many possible explanations that allow one to interpret the scientific observations into a biblical worldview.
I sometimes also call myself a six day creationist explaining that I don't know the scientific processes that occurred in those six days, but it makes God deceptive to the people who heard him utter the words, "for in six days the Lord made the heavens, the earth, the sea, and all that is in them," if he didn't do it. When Moses spoke that to the Israelites he specifically connected it to their literal work week for the Sabbath, so it's absurd to suggest that the Israelites thought he meant, "for in six arbitrary periods of time."
I also explain to others that while creationists have different possible explanations, there could be other explanations, and that these are simply the best possible explanations we have that fit with the biblical story. I find people are more open to the possibility of a younger earth when you explain to them that God can create a star and its light, so we don't need to wait 14 billion years, and also most creationists have no problem with God being able to create a star like the sun from nothing, so why should they have a problem with the rest of the universe? The implications of time dilation, the curse of the world after Adam and Eve sinned, Noah's flood, and other things can all be plausible explanations for the observable evidence.
Have you looked into Walt Brown's hydroplate theory? I think it's got the answers you're looking for. Very complete, with many accurate predictions.
@@guineapigsith699 That and similar explanations revolving around plate tectonics with the flood make a lot of sense. I don't like to push any one hyoothesis as true, but certainly the Flood as the catalyst makes a lot of sense. It's certainly a much better explanation for the sudden loss of the dinosaurs, the rapid fossilization of them, and the apparent flooding of dinosaurs worldwide than the asteroid theory. The fundamental flaw with the asteroid theory is everything but the dinosaurs being more or less unaffected. If there was an asteroid impact as destructive as they believe, then everything from plants and trees to reptiles should have been wiped out, but that's not at all what they claim.
Your right, most theists wouldn’t have a problem with such silly explanations, as long as they get to keep believing.
@@litigioussociety4249 It's impossible for the earth to be young. Daughter isotopes with half-lives in excess of a billion years cannot exist in an environment that is only a few thousand years old.
If you knew as much science as you claim then you'd be a theistic evolutionist. Or just evolutionist.
@@speciesspeciate6429 It depends on what is meant by "young earth." For example, there is the time dilation theory that says the mass of the universe crested on day 4 would actually have caused 14 billion years to be experienced by the universe in the time they earth experienced one day. Other similar theories posit that eons of erosion, decay, formation etc. could have occurred in minutes by an omnipotent creator. For example, the idea of a powerful person being able to cause an acorn to grow into an oak tree in a moment would be able to make the oak tree still grow rings like normal.
There is also the matter of last thursdayism. Most people assume when God created something like the sun, it was like the sun we see now, not a nebula of gas that had to form into the sun, or a much younger sun that had a higher hydrogen to helium ratio that would have to wait billions of years to be aged to where it is now. Likewise, the moon being made at its approximate current distance, which works out perfect for total solar eclipses and annulars.
The point is there are several ways of explaining the different ages assigned to things by secular science.
Dr Ham was my professor at wolbi, I took copious notes Me n mine r forever grateful to u doc
Ham is not a Doctor.
@@Bomtombadi1 Im not even a College grad, but thinks to people like Ken I know things that people with a PHD are entirely ignorant of.
@@beestoe993 being ignorant of infantile beliefs doesn’t mean said infantile beliefs are true.
@@Bomtombadi1 Now I regret doing the drop down just to find that you had already taken the words out of my mouth. He’s as much of a doctor as conman Kent Hovind is. These people are so gullible.
I feel sorry for you. Get a real education.
This was so good
There is a simple answer to the question of "How can all of the different people have come from two?" That answer is a couple questions to the atheist, "you believe that ALL life comes from one cell, which miraculously gave itself life. How can ALL life be from ONE cell? Wouldn't that make all kinds of anomalies and defects?
Atheist here.
I don't exactly understand any of your three questions.
1. "you believe that ALL life comes from one cell, which miraculously gave itself life"
Are you suggesting that we think that a cell somehow first had to exist and it then gave itself life?
2. "How can ALL life be from ONE cell?"
Are you thinking that we believe one single cell gave rise to one life form, then it gave rise to another different life form, and then another?
3. "Wouldn't that make all kinds of anomalies and defects?"
Do you believe we think that all mutations are deleterious?
The answer is quite simple it's an allegory a biblical story no different than the Prodigal Son just like the Eucharist it shouldn't be taken literally
@@felixramos1608 No it is NOT an allegory, otherwise it would be stated as such. It is an historical account.
@@rolandwatts3218 If two people could not make all people then how can ONE cell make ALL of life, especially when the cell was not alive originally? How did the cell "give itself" life? (That is far more preposterous than believing in Adam and Eve and also statistically impossible). If only two humans would make all kinds of anomalies then why wouldn't one cell do the same?
@@felixramos1608 The prodigal son is an *allegory* and Jesus frequently used allegory to illustrate spiritual principles. The creation account is just that, and *account* AKA a re-TELLING of a story of what actually happened.
Thank God for Ken and Kirk. I 😘 ve them
Glad to see you Kirk with Summit yesterday in CO!
I fully agree with Ken Ham. I used to think the global flood was only rising water, but that never explained why other boats did not survive. The flood was violent in ways that reshaped the planet. Anthracite coal is made from buried forests, if that process occurred gradually the trees would have decayed as happens with all organic matter that is exposed to oxygen.
Other boats? I thought the idea was there was no sea!?!
@@kokoeteantigha389 Maybe he’s referring to them “desert boats”. People in deserts have to get around, too, and they can’t all afford camels.
Anthracite coal is currently being made as we speak at numerous places around the Earth, and there is not a global flood currently happening, at least not that I am aware of.
Ham and Cameron have been indoctrinated into believing nonsense.
Dinner is served? Seriously, do you know how much coal was made by the global flood? Whatever coal is being produced today pales in comparison. There is deep coal beds in the ocean south of Australia and into Antarctica! Jesus gave the global flood as an example of the sudden destruction which will come upon the earth. That's why I believe in the global flood - since I was a child.
"For as in those days before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day when Noah entered the ark, and they were unaware until the flood came and swept them all away, so will be the coming of the Son of Man.' Matthew 24:38-39
@@timothykeith1367 Besides the little fact that there was no global flood, and the Bible is mythology and folklore, at best. Those little facts tend to elude you guys.
If a flood caused coal deposits, why aren’t they only an inch or two thick, which is what would happen if a flood killed a forest. It’s because they formed over millions of years of of plants dying and adding matter by shedding leaves and continually adding more matter to the deposits.
Every single thing that these indoctrinated morons spout about geology, is wrong.
As someone who has visited the Grand Canyon in person, I highly recommend visiting! Absolutely breathtaking! Only a mighty Creator could create something like that!
Except for the fact that it was created by natural geological processes without a creator involved. God is great if you are able to ignore reality.
The Colorado river formed the Grand Canyon.
😂😂😂
I'm 66 & a lifetime Catholic. I've never been told or encouraged to read the Bible. I recently developed a real hunger to KNOW for myself what's in the Bible. I have begin reading it with a Bible Study group-different religions. I would venture to say that those who are athiests or even those who want to argue every little thing in the Bible--that none of them has ever really read the Bible.
No legitimate geologists would agree with these two, nor would any legitimate biologists.
explain more I really like to know more?
@@joshuatoro8977 Maybe I worded that incorrectly….no legitimate geologist agrees with these two, nor do any legitimate biologists.
They would likely point out that the Coconino sandstone layer is an eolian deposit, not from some flood. Ken Ham never does explain how post-flood Cenozoic fossils form. In their debate, Bill Nye brought up the point that all fossils would be jumbled up in a flood and that is not what we see. For some strange reason we only find stegasaurus in late Jurassic deposits and Quetzalcoatl in Late Cretaceous.
Very! Very! Good!! Thank you for sharing!! Glory to God Almighty!!!!!!!!!!!🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌
@@ShoestringRacer If I were a better person that's how I'd live my life now. It's going to be such a relief leaving all this toil and ingratitude behind. I hope to see you there, Racer!
ARE YOU KIDDING ME???? THIS IS UNADULTERATED NONSENSE , SO SNAKES AND DONKEYS CAN TALK??????
Thank you 😊
If there was a flood, how did all the plants survive?
Magic
let me ask everyone at comments on here or read this what are you guys think of TBN I was raised to believe that they were some crackpot TV show or studio producing place but I see Kirk Cameron someone I really trust in the Christian faith and it really rocks my own faithful what I think about TBN anyone have answers to help me with this?
we have stories, where someone found whales buried vertically in many strata in Peru and California. There had to be a catastrophic event, such as Noah's Flood. If we look at the strata, we see layers of sediment settled at different rates, which is due to the type of strata. We test soil samples by making a slurry and watch what settles. Clay seems to settle on the bottom first. where as loomy soil tends to settle last.
Lol whales drowned?
@@Andromedon777 whales don’t have gills.
@@kingpalafox1045 But they swim....
Man, this is dumb.
Whales don't swim under many feet of mud. They drowned in mud because they are in strata. They can't breathe in mud.
Amen and amen ❤❤❤❤
thanks
Between the Old Testament and the book of Enochthis story is clear! Satan was corrupting the dna of mankind in order to try prohibit a savior. There were angels giants ruling men and woman and teaching sorcery and demon worship! God had to destroy them to save mankind it was not unjust it was actually gracious in order to save His creation.
Absolutely correct, and I am surprised that Ken didn't point Kirk to Genesis 6, which would have given more background to the answer he did give him.
He does alot of gymnastics with his mind and stories!
Noah only had to trust in God. God made the Ark safe and last and land where it did.
Ken just had a mic drop
The fossils and the Cambrian explosion crexplosion proof creationism perfectly
No, they don’t, cupcake.
@@Bomtombadi1 they do, and what's with the gay pet names? Do your research before you go calling other dudes cupcake and making ignorant statements haha
@@Bomtombadi1 the burden of proof falls to you. The Cambrian explosion is a time period in which ALL SPECIES come into existence. Fossil records, carbon dating, all that proves it. The fossils, however, do not show evolution or its process. Fire back "cupcake". Freaking fruit basket
@@dennisprow7576 no, cupcake. That’s not when ALL species come into existence. There are pre-Cambrian fossils, too. Carbon dating proves all species came into existence? That’s a new one!
So are we to find elephants and bunnies and birdies in the Cambrian?
Lol - I need to do MY research? This is too cute.
@@dennisprow7576 Hey Dennis, since you like to use the scientific discovery of the Cambrian explosion... Do you happen to know how long that "explosion" lasted?
Kirk
Have you been to the Museum’s
God did not create dogs he made K9s . Dogs are man-made mutants that's why man called a dog a dog because it's god spelled backwards.
“Animals” were villagers in the City where Noah lived.
😶
“Separating clean and unclean animals”
😶
That was Noah using virtue and interacting with villagers
Our lives on Earth are all LEND/BORROWED from God... we never SIGNED any contract neither BOUGHT nor CHOSE the LIVES that we wanted but it was FREELY GIVEN... Analogy/for example... a Neighbor lends his BIKE to you... You could use it to the fullest of any purpose it might serve, but you also have the duties and responsibilities to protect the Bike from being MARKED. DAMAGED, repaired, or destroyed, for any moment the Owner of the Bike can take it back "AS IS." even w/o your approval... the same analogy with our LIVES... here today and gone tomorrow... but with the HOPE and FAITH of Everlasting Life with God after Death of the Flesh... Amen.
No materialist explanation for God ever persuaded an atheist. But then atheists have no explanation for where material came from.
Let's just put aside all science as we know it.
According to Genesis 10:25 and 1 Chronicles 1:19, it was during the time of Peleg that the earth was divided - traditionally, this is often assumed to be just before, during, or after the failure of the Tower of Babel, whose construction was traditionally attributed to Nimrod.
It took a long time for the hydroplates to settle
We have NO RIGHT to judge/accuse/condemn God of being UNJUST for sending the Great Flood in Noah's Days... God is the maker and giver of LIFE, therefore, God has the right to take back what are His... no question asked... We NEVER SIGNED any contract neither BOUGHT nor CHOSE the life that God gave us... it was FREELY GIVEN by God, therefore, GOD has the RIGHT to FREELY take it BACK...
We definitely do not need the I.Q. of Einstein to understand and comprehend this matter unless we have a very poor low I.Q... Amen.
By that warped logic it's OK for parents to murder their own children.
@@billaitken2989 God the creator of everything, visible and invisible, has the "Sole RIGHT" to GIVE and TAKE lives... Murder is not a RIGHT, but a CRIME, in both God's Law and Man's Law... Human Parents have no RIGHT to take the lives (ABORTION) of their unborn children for they themselves are only created by GOD... in fact, ALL Humans have no RIGHT to take lives...
God allowed the Government Authority Powered by/for/of the People to take a life if the crime was committed, given a fair trial, and proven without any reasonable doubt that the person committed a capital crime, that deserves the DEATH penalty,...
God allowed also the Government Authority Powered by/for/of the People to Wage WAR if another Nation tries to invade their own Country and take AWAY over God-given Human FREEDOM... which includes SELF-DEFENCE...
God also allowed the Doctors to remove/terminate the pregnancy "ONLY IF" found a "Terminal Medical Health" issue/case that will be in dangering the life of the Mother... RAPE or INCEST is not allowed by God to be aborted, but the infant/baby upon born may be legally adopted by a Married Hetero Couple without children of their own...
Facts and Truth, Biblically and Legally speaking...
@@billaitken2989 Our LIFE on Earth is just a "LIMITED FREE BORROWED LIFE" from God... When you were born, did you PAY any SORT of amount to God, that you can say, "I BOUGHT THIS LIFE, I OWNED THIS LIFE OF MINE, I CAN DO WHATEVER I WANT TO MY BODY AND TO MY LIFE?"... Nope, NOBODY does... Therefore, it is a LIMITED FREE BORROWED LIFE we have on Earth... Can God take it back ANYTIME GOD WANTS IT?... Definitely, YES for sure 100%...
God gave us FREEWILL to choose Good or Evil but with attached CONSEQUENCES... to choose GOOD and you will be REWARDED,... or to choose EVIL and you will be PUNISHED whether here on Earth thru the Authority of the Government that God allowed to established on Earth or if you escape the punishment on Earth, then on the Afterlife of ETERNAL PUNISHMENT in Hell, without parole... nothing escapes JUSTICE from the hands of God... God is FAIR and JUST... and God moves at HIS OWN RIGHT TIME, and not our own right time.
God also allowed all Human Beings living on Earth (while still alive) to be TESTED/TEMPTED by Satan/Devil, who brought injustices, unfairness, inequality, sadness, illness, suffering (mental, physical, and emotional), and death to the innocents... why?... For God to know, if the People especially the Christians, "LOVE" God above all, even after we suffered great things from Satan (Devil), just like the story of JOB... Analogy... in school most often our Teachers give extra POINTS to those who do extra curriculum activities that could elevate our Class Standing of Honorolls... the same analogy... that is as an extra REWARDS from God on Earth or in Heaven... if God is pleased on us in spite of the sufferings we have been through and endures it without cursing, blaming and renouncing God, 100x our rewards in Heaven, and sometimes given on Earth...
When Job did not curse, blame and renounce God in spite of all the suffering he endured from Satan/Devil, such as all his Family being wipe-out died, all his properties being lost, and unbearable skin diseases/sores/itches all over his body including his face (living corpse)... God, healed him and rewarded Job with a longer life to have a New Family, New Children, and his properties are 100X bigger than the ones he lost...
For me, if ever I deserved to have a REWARD from God, I pray, it will be given to me in Heaven, where "moths and robbers" can not steal it from me and stay there eternally...
Facts and Truth, Biblically speaking... Amen
DNA allows us to estimate the original minimal herd that generates a population. Humanity is not compatible with a single pair we descend from. So much for Adam and Eve. But we knew that. Where could Kain find a wife otherwise?
Soooo, where did the DNA come from, in your world view.
Please don't say the stupidity and impotency of the big bang
Incest ?
Why can't I watch this?
As a fellow Aussie and Queenslander i have to ask. Ken can you grow a `stache?
Do we find fossilized humans who were caught up in the flood???
No, cause that shit never happened
Boy can ham is one smart man
As in a con artist must be smart.
@@wadenovin2479 how you talking about yourself
Our LIFE on Earth is just a "LIMITED FREE BORROWED LIFE" from God... When you were born, did you PAY any SORT of amount to God, that you can say, "I BOUGHT THIS LIFE, I OWNED THIS LIFE OF MINE, I CAN DO WHATEVER I WANT TO MY BODY AND TO MY LIFE?"... Nope, NOBODY does... Therefore, it is a LIMITED FREE BORROWED LIFE we have on Earth... Can God take it back ANYTIME GOD WANTS IT?... Definitely, YES for sure 100%...
God gave us FREEWILL to choose Good or Evil but with attached CONSEQUENCES... to choose GOOD and you will be REWARDED,... or to choose EVIL and you will be PUNISHED whether here on Earth thru the Authority of the Government that God allowed to established on Earth or if you escape the punishment on Earth, then on the Afterlife of ETERNAL PUNISHMENT in Hell, without parole... nothing escapes JUSTICE from the hands of God... God is FAIR and JUST... and God moves at HIS OWN RIGHT TIME, and not our own right time.
God also allowed all Human Beings living on Earth (while still alive) to be TESTED/TEMPTED by Satan/Devil, who brought injustices, unfairness, inequality, sadness, illness, suffering (mental, physical, and emotional), and death to the innocents... why?... For God to know, if the People especially the Christians, "LOVE" God above all, even after we suffered great things from Satan (Devil), just like the story of JOB... Analogy... in school most often our Teachers give extra POINTS to those who do extra curriculum activities that could elevate our Class Standing of Honorolls... the same analogy... that is as an extra REWARDS from God on Earth or in Heaven... if God is pleased on us in spite of the sufferings we have been through and endures it without cursing, blaming and renouncing God, 100x our rewards in Heaven, and sometimes given on Earth...
When Job did not curse, blame and renounce God in spite of all the suffering he endured from Satan/Devil, such as all his Family being wipe-out died, all his properties being lost, and unbearable skin diseases/sores/itches all over his body including his face (living corpse)... God, healed him and rewarded Job with a longer life to have a New Family, New Children, and his properties are 100X bigger than the ones he lost...
For me, if ever I deserved to have a REWARD from God, I pray, it will be given to me in Heaven, where "moths and robbers" can not steal it from me and stay there eternally...
Facts and Truth, Biblically speaking... Amen
Without faith it is impossible to please God!
Without faith it’s impossible to believe in (a)God, and faith is the absolute worst way to come to truth.
@@dross4207 He was quoting God's word, and God's word also tells us that faith is a gift of God. I believe what he quoted is to be understood as in, doing something in faith vrs. against one's conscience ( as spoken about by Paul in writings about the "weaker brother" ) &/OR in one's flesh/for self, not God ( all our righteousness is as filthy rags). As for what you're saying, how do u know ? I'm guessing you have in mind the times people end up believing in untrue things, due to faith vrs. evidence, facts, truth. But even a stopped clock tells the correct time twice a day. One can not know all of the evidence, facts and truth AND, for other reasons end up at the truth. I can passionately believe that my family member is innocent of the criminal charges against them, based on my faith in them, and end up being justified OR not. In the case of God, Abraham believed God and it was credited to him for righteousness" . Wether or not God existed wasn't the issue, that was obvious to Abraham. It was whether or not God was trustworthy and infallible. We, wether we know it or not, have only the same issue. The position you're coming from, I'm guessing, is the from the idea that we're all justifiably beginning at the question of a Creator even existing and the Bible being His word/true. Abraham wasn't raised on all of the ignorance and lies of today, and in his willingness to love and serve his Creator, had grown into an undeniable personal relationship with Him, so, he didn't have that hang-up. We needn't have it either, so, it's no excuse. I mean, we can't help it if we were raised ignorant of all of the facts and evidence and reasonableness - above any other conclusion and belief- for knowing we have a Creator and the Bible is His trustworthy word to us, but that doesn't make it not true and most of us can find that out sooner than later, if we were only willing to. So, thus, we really are, whether we know it or not, all in the same position as Abraham. Down to the choice of our free will, to choose to trust God, or not. The same issue presented to Adam and Eve, even in their innocence and perfection, & in a perfect environment. The fact we have a free will and must use it. Unlike Adam and Eve, we have started out corrupt and Spiritually dead and with even more lies of Satan. But God is there to help anyone who's "willing to receive the love of the truth" & willing to repent from serving self, and turn to Him in surrender. That is choosing faith, which He gives to all who are willing to surrender to their Creator. To choose rightful submission to His rightful authority. To be willing to, if indeed He does exist and is good, and are willing to be shown that He is, it indeed He is. Those who grasp that that is only right, that anything else is wicked, arrogant treason. Many people the world over, throughout history, have come to the gist of this understanding, without knowing all of the rest, and have been blessed in their willingness to repent from self-worship and serve God instead, without even having the Bible in their possession or all of the evidence for it or any of the learned, scientific discoveries and information proving the Bible true again and again.
They weren't blinded by pride and puffed up by man's knowledge, so were able to hear the still, small voice of God speaking to their spirits. Yes, one can fall for a false god, too. God is able, however, to provide for and protect all who want truth, want Him. Either keep them from it in the 1st place, or send someone with the Bible etc. to provide for them the lacking knowledge to weed out the false doctrines, the false teachers, the deceiving spirits. God is faithful ! We can snd should trust Him, because He IS trust-WORTHY. Trust Him and see, it's the only way to KNOW.
@@ajb.822 For one thing, you don’t know whose word, if anyone at all, that he was quoting. No one has ever shown God, or any god for that matter, to be real or exist.
Faith has ALWAYS been a terrible way to come to truth. That was true then, and remains true today.
Of course you can be right on faith alone, but that doesn’t make it rational to believe that you are right on faith alone. Someone can have faith that a three legged leprechaun exists, and they could be right, but that doesn’t make it rational to believe that they are right. That’s the category that gods belong in. They have never been shown to exist, they are fantastical, wizard like beings, and they have never given a single answer to any unknown, and with natural explanations being responsible for 100% of what is known, there is no indication that anything ever will have an explanation that is otherwise.
Sorry about that, I LOVE. Cats!!
The great flood was at the end of the younger dryas event!
We have always homeschooled and use biblical science - including the Answers in Genesis - and we have learned all of this. My kids love and believe the Bible and Noah’s flood was real
Yikes…biblical science?
Also, prior to the flood the earth was very congenial to life - no clouds, water came up through the earth, moderate climate, etc. plus people lived for 700-900+ years - Adam 930 years old. After the flood the earth was more hostile; clouds, rain, heat, cold, elevation changes, etc. Therefore the earth changed during the flood.
It may have been bad timing for some
Not only the fossils but Noah's Ark is actually resting on Mount Arafat it's there it's been located nobody ever talks about that very odd
Maybe cause it isn't?
How did Noah get all the animals back to their various countries of origin after the ark came to rest in Turkey? How did he even manage to assemble them in the first place?
@@billaitken2989 magic?
That's wrong. It's been proven to be rock and mud in the vague shape of a boat, and there are others just like it in the same area.
How can Kirk Cameron say he's a born again Christian, when he's appeared numerous times on TBN, which is a network founded by Pau; and Jan Crouch, who claom to be little gods? I would question Kirk's Chrisrianity intemsely.
I admire Kirk's body of work in spreading the gospel, but am a bit disturbed that he has given Ken Ham a forum to express his personal interpretation of the Bible through his geology of the Grand Canyon hubris without challenge. The "flood geology" used to advance the young earth interpretation focuses on river beds, deltas, coral reefs and other areas that most secular geologists agree are only tens of thousands of years old, but abundant proof exists of a much older earth. Ken speaks eloquently; however, he and his young earth acolytes claim that both Biblical literalism (interpret literally where possible) and science prove their interpretation of Genesis. But, when pressed to the point where the supposed science doesn’t support their hermeneutic, they default to 2 Peter 3 and claim a prophetic vision that Peter had of the "coming of evolutionist theory through uniformitarianism." They then create division within the church by labeling devout Christians who believe in an older earth as "uniformitarianists", and attack their fellow believers by accusing them of siding with evolutionist atheists. In doing so, they blur the the message of salvation in Jesus Christ by tying it to their interpretation of Genesis and they manufacture a straw man war between Biblical literalists and "atheistic" science (If you're not with us, you're against us.). Because Ken's young earth hermeneutic requires distilling the entire Bible through the crucible of Genesis 1, the young earth position is strung together as though attempting to work a crossword puzzle when the first word chosen is wrong. In defending a 6,000 year old earth, Ken expects we should “strain out a gnat and swallow a camel.”
Lucifer in his Pride Confronted and challenged GOD with doing what Lucifer thought was a Better Way. For Lucifer's arrogance Vanity and Pride as it is today in society GOD JUDGED Them and Cast Them Out of Heaven and Down to a Fallen Earth.
Next week Jack and the Beanstalk.. A talking snake and a man who claims to have lived in the belly of a whale..followed by a woman who turned to turned to salt.. this is hilarious!!
Graham Hankock and Randall Carlson are experts in this field Ken Ham is not. The earth and universe shows signs that they are far older then 12,000 years old. Read books on this subject
Ark Encounter has dinosaurs in cages on the Ark. There are no pterodactyls today. They want you to believe in a form of evolution. I was very disappointed.
The Ark they built is turning black from mold? Though it matched a six colored rainbow umbrella with a black sliver they sell.
I don’t remember seeing Genesis 7:2 covered at the Ark Encounter.
I like Kirk Cameron and I pray for him. I pray that he changes his views on the series called the chosen. There's a lot wrong with that series. For one thing quite a bit of it is not biblical and neither are the people in it. But he praises it and says why not let's give the Bible a different outlook. Something to that effect he said. Kurt get back to biblical principles.
All morality and goodness comes from God, even the care of women and children. If we were pagans we wouldn’t care less about the lives of others.
Well I am not a pagan, but I am an atheist. I certainly care about the lives of others. And I have come across pagans on a few forums and they have never struck me as folk who don't care about other people.
@@rolandwatts3218 The point is Roland you'd have no conception of the value of human life if it weren't for God crafting it into the human psyche through the Hebrews and then Christ. The Bible is the account of the process God used to force us out of our natural inclinations and into a condition where human life is valuable. Remember, every pre-Biblical civilisation practised human sacrifice. Abraham and Isaac is the account of God teaching man to give up child sacrifice.
@@guineapigsith699
//The point is Roland you'd have no conception of the value of human life if it weren't for God crafting it into the human psyche through the Hebrews and then Christ.//
How do you know that?
//The Bible is the account of the process God used to force us out of our natural inclinations and into a condition where human life is valuable.//
Jephthah's daughter did not seem to be too valuable. Neither did Lot's daughters.
//... every pre-Biblical civilisation practised human sacrifice.//
How do you know that? (The bible only deals with a limited number of cultures).
@@rolandwatts3218
1) Because the value of human life was a concept that didn't exist in pre-Biblical societies and doesn't exist in post-Biblical societies (see: abortion, eugenics, extermination camps). So the taboo would never have developed.
2) The context of Jephthah's & Lot's daughters is that their deaths are tragic. This context wouldn't exist if it weren't for the lesson of Isaac. Jephthah & Lot were fallen men. You can't hold them up as moral examples, they are moral lessons. The account of the Old Testament is God hammering the same lessons into the Hebrews over and over again, and over and over again they turn away from these lessons and engage in evil. The account of the New Testament is God coming to earth to explain this in person.
3) India, Rome, Greece, America, Polynesia, Europe, China, Australia - all had human sacrifice and/or cannibalism (as ritual or war, not just times of famine). All I could find at a glance about Russia was during USSR but I'd bet it's there in the ancient past if you look for it.
What do you say to that?
@@guineapigsith699
//1) Because the value of human life was a concept that didn't exist in pre-Biblical societies and doesn't exist in post-Biblical societies (see: abortion, eugenics, extermination camps). So the taboo would never have developed. //
Don't you think humans in pre and post biblical times had or have empathetic senses?
It seems to me that, on reading ancient Greek myths for example, that people mourned at the loss of loved ones. I doubt that they would mourn if human life had no value.
//The account of the Old Testament is God hammering the same lessons into the Hebrews over and over again, and over and over again they turn away from these lessons and engage in evil.//
So why punish the young women, for the things the adults did? Naturally, if the young women had little to no value, they would make good sacrifices, right?
//India, Rome, Greece, America, Polynesia, Europe, China, Australia - all had human sacrifice and/or cannibalism ...//
I have no doubt that parts of those places practiced these at certain times. As for it being universal in all cultures at all times, I doubt it.
//All I could find at a glance about Russia was during USSR but I'd bet it's there in the ancient past if you look for it. //
That's possible. There is even evidence that the ancient Hebrews practiced child sacrifice.
So right Dinosaurs were just normal animals 1000 years old. They also went in the Ark as baby animals. Wish I could see your Ark museum. If the atheist were right, today there would have to be trillions of people on the earth.
Haha not at all.
Fossilisations takes eons.
I recommend that Kirk interview Hugh Ross of Reasons to Believe. He would learn that young earth Biblical interpretation is grievously wrong. He would find out why old earth (but anti-evolution) beliefs are correct.
What is this man speaking about God raised up the mountain and lower the basins? Genesis told us that God divided the waters and so there is water above the heavens. God told us that the heavens were opened and this cause the whole earth to be flooded. After the 40 day and night God with His power restore the water in the heavens and left what is suppose to be on earth in place. Please let us in our conversation always remember that God thought and ways are higher than man and He can do the impossible.
Is this serious? Or is the interviewer giving Ken Ham an opportunity to embarrass himself?
We have proven the flood, the Grand Canyon is not though. God was perfect, but he's becoming perfect or "fair".
A global flood has been disproved. The flood of Noah is plagiarized from the Epic of Gilgamesh, which is plagiarized from Atra hasis, which is based on the small localized flooding of the Iraqi delta.
Flesh and blood does agree with seen things and hear what others need it seen and science theories, Luke 17:20And when he was demanded of the Pharisees, when the kingdom of God should come, he answered them and said, The kingdom of God cometh not with observation: 21Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.
Plus what did Paul say about OT after he woke from Saul's belief needed looking and seeing is classic christians old wine mixing with unseen new wine, what did female names represent is Allegories called Covenants the unseen one never was history like seen one could be to flesh and blood still looking and waiting for whats IN THEM hiding in your I AM.
Noah same meanings in you fulfilled or outside where its shadows of new wine never seen by flesh and blood.
I apreshate the video, but the "Thumbnail" is "clickbait" and not right.
Geologists and such talk about Pangea, and that all the continents came from this one super-continent. I don't believe they're far off. In Genesis 1, it says that all the waters were "gathered in one place and dry land appeared." To me that signifies that all the water was in one place and a giant mass of land appeared - Pangea. And I believe that all the continents we have now were created from this mass of land....by way of the flood. The flood is a result of God separating all the continents. When it says in Genesis 7, it says that "all the fountains of the great deep burst open." Perhaps when God separated the continents, the water of the deep burst open between them, eventually becoming the seas and the oceans that we have today.
Just a thought.
The most important thing is that we must understand ourselves as sinful in thoughts, words and deeds and how a Holy, just and righteous God sees us but loves us enough to provide us a way of redemption. Please read: [WHY WE HAVE NO HOPE IN OURSELVES: Mk. 7:20-23 And he (Jesus) said, That which comes out of the man, that defiles the man. For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness: All these evil things (sins) come from within, and defile the man.] [WHY WE NEED A SAVIOR: Rom. 3:10-28 As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one: There is none that understands, there is none that seeks after God. They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is none that does good, no, not one. Their throat is an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips: Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness: Their feet are swift to shed blood: Destruction and misery are in their ways: And the way of peace have they not known: There is no fear of God before their eyes. Now we know that what things so ever the law says, it says to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God. Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his (God's) sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin. But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets; Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ to all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference: For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: Whom God has set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God; To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believes in Jesus. Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? Of works? Nay: but by the law of faith. Therefore we conclude that man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law. Rom. 5:1 Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ:]
So everyone on the boat of Noah, were brothers and sisters, same problems!
We see, what we want to see.
Ken says that God-created the world in 6 days , And now he just said that everything after Adam his Adam was good, So how long does it take for animals to have diseases and then die if they only lived 5 days before man?
Death came to the creation after the fall and we do not know exactly how long Adam lived until the fall. Nearly 1600-1700 years of history are summed up in the first six chapters of the Bible. So what is your question?
@@seaknightvirchow8131 He said it only took God 6 days to create the world 6 literal days, Then he said the animals were diseased before man was created so I'm confused
@@randytidmore8021 I think Ken Said that under the evolutionist paradigm, disease and death occurred before the fall but scripture says this came because of the fall. Since the fossils show evidence of disease and death, the fossils came after the fall i.e. Noah’s flood.
Grand canyon was formed by the Colorado river. There was no global flood.
How did the Colorado River run uphill over the Kiabab Uplift to begin with?
You answered your own question. Uplift. Do you know what that means in geological terms?
5:45, God raised the mountains. Okay.
ARE YOU KIDDING ME???? THIS IS UNADULTERATED NONSENSE , SO SNAKES AND DONKEYS CAN TALK??????
@@blackkman1324 Oy, no hay problema. I'm skeptical, too.
And HE uses the mountains like weights to keep balance.
***YOU CAN GET MILLIONS OF PROOFS TO JUSTIFY YOUR FANATIC IGNORANCE, BUT IT WILL NOT CHANGE WHAT GOD CREATES.***
What absolute craziness. These two dudes are nutz.
@@firstknight117 so you think the story of Noah is real? You think it actually happened? If so Then I am not insulting anyone I am stating a fact. Y’all are bonkers.
It was God and not Noah who prepares all the animals to and unto the Ark. Let us not give Noah or ourselves the credit and not God. God guided Noah to build the Ark along with the material and dimensions in order to obey the law of floatation. God also locked them in or these Giants and mankind would have broken into the Ark during the rising water. God who fed these animals and keep them to live without destroying each other including Noah and his family. Let us give God the credit and not man and Noah.
the word of God proves there was a flood
science in almost every field disproves it
When the 2 plates in the west hit each other, they created the high mountains, from Canada, USA, all the way down the Agentina.
99.9 % of Christianity is man mad. When Jesus came and preached He spoke a message against the 99.9 of His own people. Not the world. His people. Israel. It's the same today.
No, it's 100% man made.
Ken, you say, ' Because of sin there are now mutations'. Yet, mutations account for the marvelous diversity of life we see today on our planet. Therefore, our sin in the eyes of our Lord, has led to the diverse array of life on Earth. Was our fall in Eden and His wrathful vengeance part of His plan to create the wonderful world we see today ?
The seas moved, the volcanos blasted, all like the movie 2012. The earth is always on the move. It Can happened again!
Neither Cameron nor Ken Ham have a grasp of evolutionary biology. They create their own cartoon version and "debunk" it with made up "facts."
Yep, just telling people what they want to believe.
Well we will all find out someday. If you’re right then what difference does it make ? But if they’re right, HELL IS WAITING FOR YOU! Your choice.
@@melvinhunt6976 Hell ? You christians love living in fear don't you ? Christianity is nothing more than a huge scare tactic to control people...what a way to live.
@@jerrylanglois7892 Not me ! I’m not going there! Your the one with a decision still to make !Ive lived like you (maybe better,maybe worse) and l enjoy my life way Better than before! Have a good night!
You can't debunk it. Evolution is directly observed in real life and new species have evolved in our own lifetime.
We do have alot of volcano, we do have plates that move. The world can chage on a dime, like in the movie 2012.
Dead things! What a fetish the religious seem to have with dead things. Even Adam ( also dead) is of little significance, other than his sin is for sure the reason over a million babies, four days old or under would be die in the event a most forgiving God decided enough is enough.
John Adams was quoted as saying, in defense of representing British soldiers. “I would rather endure the wrath of all mankind, than to see one innocent man die.
Thomas Jefferson is my hero, but I really like the above quote by Adams and would like to change some of the words. I would rather endure the wrath of all mankind, than to take pleasure, comfort, or claim salvation, in the death of one innocent man.
💖🙏💖🙏💖
Hilarious!!
That rant does Prove that you are UN-educated!!!
so logivcal, excellent, too bad they don't use this excellent knowledge with regards to the 3 is one doctrine. LOL proves that very smart people will belive and say really stupid things lkike 3 is 1.
The Bible supports a flat earth. Also, the Earth is not moved. When the Lord returns, how will the whole world see him on a globe?
Honestly, as a science person I lose respect when Christians try to talk science to "prove" things. It might work with your followers, but science people know better. It shows that you don't know much about science. I would have more respect for Christians if they'd just stay away from the science realm and concentrate on their faith. Science and faith are 2 different things and you repel science people when you try to go that route. For what it's worth.
The bible is not a scientific textbook but when it touches on scientific matters it is always accurate.
@@angelomoore4837 Like...the earth being flat?
@@BrekLee333 Kyrie said that. Not the Bible.
@@angelomoore4837 If you search, "What earth looks like according to the bible," and click the images...you'll see it's not just Kyrie saying that.
@@angelomoore4837 Like...the virgin birth. A biological impossibility.
Atheists and every human with any mental awareness or capability, knows what is right & wrong by their "conscience." God gave us "The Natural Law" & the conscience to realize it. The NL is even mentioned in the Bible.
Romans 2:14 For when the Gentiles, who do not have the law, do by nature those things which are of the law, such persons, not having the law, are a law unto themselves. 15 For they reveal the work of the law written in their hearts, while their conscience renders testimony about them, and their thoughts within themselves also accuse or even defend them
Aquinas: "Natural Law is the same for all men... there is a single standard of truth and right for everyone... which is known by everyone"
"Actions are about singular matters: and so it is necessary for the prudent man to know both the universal principles of reason, and the singulars about which actions are concerned" (1265 AD)
There are more
Cicero: "True law is right reason in agreement with Nature; it is of universal application. Unchanging and everlasting; it summons to duty by its commands and averts from wrongdoing by its prohibitions" (54 BC)
The Book of Leviticus has a mention as well.
But if the standard of right and wrong is the sermon on the mount, can you honestly say you always have and always will live up to that standard?
@@guineapigsith699 no you cant live up to that standard. Jesus did and our faith in him brings us to this standard. He did it for us
@@Redbeardedbadass Exactly.
@@guineapigsith699 I didn't say that. However, when you sin, you will realize it first. The "Natural Law" (your conscience) will tell you.
@@gabepettinicchio7454 You're not taking wilful blindness, ignorance and social conditioning into account. Did your conscience tell you that having anger towards a person is the same as murdering them in your heart?
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.... Ham is such a clown.
According to Jesus' Lord's prayer, "Our Father who art in heaven." God is not on earth but still in His perfect world. "Thy kingdom come, thy will be done." We do this by changing our minds to God's will, metanoia. This is a difference between Jesus' teaching and the Old Testament in which God is a puppeteer manipulating life on earth.
God is omnipresent. He’s not just tucked away in His perfect world, He is very much present and working all the time. He holds the whole universe in His mighty, wonderful hands.
@@lorrainewhitehead9080 Even the woefully inadequate "world" that Jesus talked about?
“My kingdom is not of this world."
"Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. "
"For ALL that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world."
Your love of the world is showing.
@@robertdouglas8895 Let me make it absolutely clear then Robert because you seem to have got the wrong idea, I can’t wait to be eternally with Jesus in the next beautiful, totally sin free world.
@@lorrainewhitehead9080 Does that world look like this one only sin-free? Which parts of this world are what God created and which ones not?
@@robertdouglas8895 you sound like a troll?
Mother nature on the other hand, she can and would!
The flood was just! God warned people to repent. The world became so wicked. They never choose good. They sacraficed their innocent children to man made gods.....
There's a little more to it than that, read Gen.6 When the Sons of God took the daughters of man. They contaminated human DNA
So innocent children had to die in the flood en masse along with their 'wicked' parents. But the flood was somehow just and not for we mere mortals to question.
Science deniers.
Then I got news for you: dinosaur soft tissue.
@@guineapigsith699 Soft tissue is the name given to anything that isn't bone, and in this case it was collagen. It wasn't soft and gooey, it was as hard as the fossil it was encased in, and it needed to be soaked for weeks in a mild acidic solution before it could even be removed.
This issue was resolved 7 years ago. It's preserved by protein cross linking, the release of free radicals in the blood combined with iron acts as a kind of formaldehyde to aid in preservation.
The scientist involved, Dr Mary Schweitzer, is a Christian yet she's gone on record saying how upset she is that young earthers are misrepresenting her work to imply young ages. It doesn't.
The untreated fossil was carbon dated to satisfy the creationists and the results came back carbon dead because there's no carbon in it, because it's millions of years old.
Please stop repeating something that was explained years ago.
You guys can talk all you want about earthly events, but you can never connect those events to an All-knowing, All-powerful, supreme being that lives with a bunch of winged angels in paradise, while a demon (possibly with horns and a pointy tail) waits to torture everyone in a land of fire and brimstone. This premise is not only unbelievable, it's impossible. There are no such things as gods and winged angels and demons. It's time to face reality, Kirk.
@Joseph (Yozora) Either you are full of crap or you need to get your brain checked for tumors.
@Joseph (Yozora) Sorry, buddy. No gods, ghouls, witches, winged angels, Djin or demons. It's just no.
@Joseph (Yozora) No.
Do people really fall for this BS?
Seriously bad stuff. As St Augustine said about 1,500 years ago, this kind of thing makes Christianity look bad. As an atheist, that does not worry me too much but it ought to worry you guys, particularly given that you claim to love truth so much. A couple of points to show just how bad it is.
//You don't look at fossils and see evolution, you see dead things ...//
That's as silly as saying "You don't look at a fossil and see a flood. You see dead things".
//To make a fossil is a catastrophic event ...//
Well an organism does have to die first. I guess from the organism’s perspective, that could be deemed to be a catastrophe.
But beyond that, we know that it does not necessarily take a catastrophic event for fossils to form. For example, some organisms can die and fall into water that is hostile to other organisms that may destroy the associated bones, allowing them to be covered gradually. Or the organism may fall into a tar pit. Or it may be covered by a drip of resin. Or the event may be catastrophic but have nothing to do with water. For example, the organism may be covered by sand in a wind storm. Or the event may be a catastrophic event but a very localised one. For example, an undersea landslide.
We do know that, on average, any dying organism becoming fossilised is very, very, very unlikely. And a fossilised organism remaining in the geologic record to be discovered later, is also very, very unlikely.
It doesn’t worry us Roland. Not. One. Bit.
I think it bothers you somehow otherwise you wouldn’t be here watching and commenting so much about something you say doesn’t exist.
It really amazes all us Christians why atheists are constantly commenting on Christian channels. It’s just weird. I dint go to atheists pages and talk down to them or insult them so we find it weird that atheists do.
@@deejay7759
//It doesn’t worry us Roland. Not. One. Bit.//
Well that is good.
//I think it bothers you somehow otherwise you wouldn’t be here watching and commenting so much about something you say doesn’t exist. //
It does. I think truth is important.
As for commenting on things that don't exist. Missionaries go to other places to effectively comment on things they don't believe exist, namely the God's or gods of other cultures.
People often do this kind of thing.
//It really amazes all ...//
Are you sure all Christians feel the same as you?
//... us Christians why atheists are constantly commenting on Christian channels.//
Well many of us think that truth is important. And many of us understand just how damaging religious faith can be, and this includes Christianity.
//I dint go to atheists pages and talk down to them or insult them so we find it weird that atheists do.//
C'mon. Ham ought to know better. Cameron ought to know better.
There is plenty of good literature out there explaining how fossils form. It's silly to say that fossilisation requires a catastrophe. I showed how that is not necessarily the case at all and any good text book on the topic will back me up on that.
@@rolandwatts3218 we think truth is important too. We believe the Bible. No need to come rescue us. I’m sure not all Christians agree. I’m not surprised about that at all. Not concerned about it either. They have their own free will and minds to decide for themselves. Doesn’t affect my belief system one way or the other. It’s not worth arguing over. That part doesn’t bother us either.
Honestly, if what you believe is truth then Ive really lost nothing. I’ll die and that will be the end if it. It won’t matter if genesis is literal or allegorical. But OH, if what I believe is true then I have so much to gain. That’s all that matters to me. And it still won’t matter if Genesis is literal or not.
I think that’s something atheist don’t understand. We have nothing to lose by believing in biblical creation or the Bible as a whole. We have so much to gain.
@@deejay7759
//we think truth is important too.//
I know. But it does no harm to do a bit of private research and learn what those who study the process of fossilization actually think.
//No need to come rescue us.//
Consider me a kind of missionary. :) :)
^^ And I am providing a wee bit of education, free of charge.
//Honestly, if what you believe is truth then Ive really lost nothing. I’ll die and that will be the end if it. It won’t matter if genesis is literal or allegorical. But OH, if what I believe is true then I have so much to gain. That’s all that matters to me. And it still won’t matter if Genesis is literal or not.
I think that’s something atheist don’t understand. We have nothing to lose by believing in biblical creation or the Bible as a whole. We have so much to gain.//
You need to be careful with that.
When you die, maybe you will find that the Muslims are correct and you will lose everything. And given that, since the beginning of the faith, Christians have been finger pointing and fighting each other over who is the true Christian and who is the damnable heretic or the wolf in sheep's clothing, then perhaps you will find out that your specific theology is damnable heresy. Or maybe the universalists are correct, and we all make it to heaven. Worse still, if the hyper Calvinists are correct, then maybe God predestined you for hell and myself for heaven - all for his own glory, and for reasons neither of us can discern.
^^ I am not trying to frighten you, but Pascal's Wager as it's often given, is not a good argument at all. Besides, I thought the Christian God required worship in spirit and in truth. If so, then how on earth can such a God be truthfully worshipped on a just-in-case basis?
FWIW, all you can do is run with the truth as you best understand it.
The processes you're describing don't account for the vast fossil beds we find. Consider the fossils we do find were drowned as shown by the dramatic spine curvature, and that they must have been buried instantly otherwise the spine curvature would have relaxed.
Kirk Cameron is going to hell.
Why, for talking bollocks? That's a bit harsh, isn't it?