From the King of Romance to Pathaan | FC PopCorn | A Film Companion Original
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
- To listen to the full podcast, click here: link.chtbl.com...
For more than two and a half decades, Shah Rukh Khan has ruled the hearts of audiences, both on and off the screen. In the first episode of FC PopCorn, we have Anupama Chopra, Rahul Desai and Prathyush Parasuraman talk about what they love about Shah Rukh, what to expect from him in 2023, and the dawn of SRK 3.0!
Tune into FC PopCorn, A Film Companion Original every Tuesday to listen to Film Companion critics discuss all things pop culture.
Visit us at filmcompanion.in
Subscribe to @FilmCompanionStudios @FilmCompanionSouth @FilmCompanionLocal @FilmCompanionReviews @FilmCompanionExpress
Follow Us On:
/ filmcompanion
/ filmcompanion
/ filmcompanion
About us:
Reviews & More by Film Companion is India's most loved movie review channel bringing you reviews of the latest Bollywood, Hollywood movies, and OTT content. Along with reviews, you will also find Listicles, video essays, and recommendations. Subscribe to our channel for engaging and insightful videos from the world of entertainment and pop culture.
It is not possible to put SRK in buckets like this. He started with films like Maya Memsab. But then he also did a Raju Ban gaya. He changed the definition of a hero through Baazigar and Darr. He brought back the sweet romance through DDLJ and KKHH. He showed his subtle side in Swades and Veer Zara ..... honestly this can go on and on. It is convenient to label SRK as a romantic hero. But in reality, he has always done different things in his career.
Common guys, we like him as Romantic hero but he can't do it much now, he is 57.
I am really excited for his future installment
Yess...very smart transition
As much as I respect this conversation, it's kind of double standard to ask Shahrukh to bring back that romance. Till Zero, he was asked to let go of these romantic roles and focus on something else and now they want him to bring that romance again! Where's the logic in this? He's 57. He has to chart out a new path of action for his career to sustain. It's not about action films as well. With Dunki, he's gonna be that sweet, charming guy on screen again. It's a good mixture of films he has lined up.
Exactly how is HE supposed to bring back Romance . 🤦🤦🤦
Yes exactly! till about zero every human wanted him to leave romance and do varied roles now that he is doing it people are like "do another romantic film"
Honestly it's idiotic.. I agree with you
Totally agreed. They are totally acting like hypocrite. When he does romance ,they say his age doesn't suit it. When he does different, they want romance. Indian critics are bullshit.
I agree with u. I used to hear. “Oh he’s is so old and he is romanticising with such a young girl”. And now I am hearing -“ he should do a romantic movie again”. Are these donkeys seriously donkeys or are they just some topsy turvy confused humans. Either way, I don’t care about what they were saying or what they are saying now. Srk is coming back. Be it abs or not. I dont care. He is doing everything for us. He never went after superstardom. It came to him on its own. He made brilliant movies like Fan and Zero in which there were no abs but still people criticised him. That’s the shit reality that we are living in.
I disagree with the point that his stardom has limitations if he can't change the course of films. He has successfully changed the course, thrice. First as the anti-hero of early 90s. Then as the romantic guy from mid 90s and then in late 00s after Chakde. At some point, you do run out of these tickets and have to listen to the markets as well
100%
Exactly!!!!
100% agree. You can't play the same kind of role with different decade and specially with growing age.
Infact, I would like to see a Salman or an Aamir try to change the course of the indsutry. Aamir's formula is as old as Lagaan. Salman changed the course once in 2010 by riding on remakes and the southern formula of massy films. Akshay brought in the wave of nationalism. These are stars from late 80s and early 90s.
100% agreed
It is not Khan's responsibility to cater to what a segment of the audience likes especially the critics. The critics do not like 99% of the stuff anyway. Khan should just do the kind of stories that he truly enjoys telling. None of these people matter tbh. None of them.
Well said. I agree with u. I am a fan of Shah Rukh. And whatever he does always makes me happy. There is not a single movie that I don’t like in the era, which they are calling disappointing. And more importantly, I was born in 2005. I am not even a 90’s kid. But his movies were very magical to me. Yep I also started with his romantic movies only. But his new version was never bad.
Spot on! If he started doing movies for these 3 idiots, he'll be relegated to a small streaming platform in quick time.
Let the King do what he enjoys the most and let's hope we can enjoy that too.
I wouldn't describe this as SRK 2.0. I would say this is more like SRK 4.0.
Each of his decades in the industry have been very distinct from each other.
Eggjactly... SRKs First Version of himself is recognized as his Antagonistic Version... while the 2.0 was his era of romance starting from DDLJ to Om Shanti Om or Maybe till My Name Is Khan or Jab Tak Hai Jaan... and then his downfall started when he turned out himself as his 3.0 Version from Chennai Express(the intentions might not were wrong but it was what it was till Zero)... and now his lineup of Pathaan, Jawan and Dunki looks like his 4.0 Version... looks like he's coming back keeping in mind what audiences want from him... that's the SRK 4.0🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
@@priyanshkumar2807 His 2.0 era (i.e. era of romance) lasted the longest from 1995-2012.
You said what I was thinking. Such a poor critical analysis from this team
@@priyanshkumar2807 it didn't became down fall at all...he only got 3 flops (fan ,jhms,zero) rest all are blockbusters,super hits ,Clean hits ... don't just post shit here... anything that got box-office in this era is justified...get ready for same shit in coming years....you call that as shit...if you want your desired content cinema hall is not place go for ott
@@priyanshkumar2807 he just wanted to take a break for 1 year because of all surgery and rest ...then COVID came it became 4 year gap ... that's why we have 3 movies in a year for srk
When we don't support
Fan
Dear Zindagi
Like movies and still call that he is cheating on us .
Two face world exist
I disagree with almost everything that they said here.
They said that Khan starting catering to the superstardom and mass audiences post 2007.
Let's just look at the movies Khan did and decide for yourself:
1. 2007 - Om Shanti Om and Chak De India. Was Chak De catering to mass and superstar or the male audience they refer to?? In OSO, they themselves agreed that it was a tongue in cheek take on the Bollywood industry of the times that basically said that a starson with a six pack and no talent, could still become the big star. How was it catering to mass? How is that catering to male audience or the superstar? It was all exactly opposite of that. A star of SRK's stature is making a complete fool of himself in OSO as Om Kapoor the star and making the audience chuckle n entertain. That's not pandering to superstardom.
2. 2008 - Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi
He made Surinder Sahni, the meek ordinary middle class guy win over the leading lady n the audiences alike, while 'the' Raj, who symbolised the glossy exterior n flamboyance, lost. How is that pandering to superstardom or male audience... How ?
3. 2009 - he had an extended cameo in Billu. Not going to comment on this 20 minute appearance.
4. 2010 - My Name Is Khan
He played a guy with Asperger's syndrome and won critical acclaim for it. You would be nuts if you think this is catering to superstardom or male audience or exterior or whatever.
5. 2011 - Ra. One and Don 2
He tried something new again with India's first full fledged superhero genre in RaOne and stylized action in Don 2.
6. 2012 - Jab Tak Hai Jaan
A Yash Chopra romance with a flimsy storyline but Khan stood tall as Samar Anand and grounded the narrative in each n every scene n made the audiences fall in love with him again. Khan played Samar differently, one with brooding intensity, maturity and cool. It was a swoony Yash Chopra love story. There was no action there.
7. 2013 - Chennai Express
Khan attempted something different again. He went all out with a complete madcap comedy. It had the love story too but that Chennai Express Rahul was completely different from his earlier Raj n Rahul. In that film, in one scene, the leading lady kicks him out of the bed... Is that pandering to superstar. The movie had mass action because it was a Rohit Shetty film.
8. 2014 - Happy New Year- A Farah Khan dance based comedy masala film. No action here too.
9. 2015 - Fan, Dilwale
Rohit Shetty masala film. It had some action but much less than other Rohit films plus it had Kajol kicking some ass too.
10.2016 - Fan, Dear Zindagi
Fan was Khan's best performance ever and he did completely out of the blue stuff. Again, he played something very different in DZ as Dr Jehangir Khan, a psychiatrist I guess who was kind, mature, gentle, wise. How is that pandering to male audience or to the superstardom???? How??????
11. 2017 - Raees, Jab Harry Met Sejal
In Raees, he played an earthy character in a bootlegger with a heart of gold. It was a good mass entertainer, had real good believable action pieces. It was very different from what Khan had ever done before.
JHMS - Again different stuff. It was an edgy love story. Khan for the first time played a womanizer ... First time ever. He played a lost, lonely, bruised n battered tour guide whose only cure was an unassuming simpleton like Sejal. How is that pandering to superstardom???
12. 2018 - Zero
He played a vertically challenged character n owned the role. Need I say more??
So, basically Khan has done something different every single time but these people just can't see it. They just want to put their own perceptions and assumptions on his filmography and there is absolutely no truth to their words.
I agree, in all the 90's Rahul and Raj SRK acted as were just a bit annoying and pretty similar. Even before oso he did try different roles like Devdas (as a NRI who is easily angry and sad in the second half, different from his typical Rahul and Raj) and Veer Zara (as a calm and gentle lover ) . They say that in Swades he is a lover boy but I don't think so and definitely not like the Rahul and Raj type.2006 was Don and KANK ( a nassersistic and disappointed guy) were he played completely different roles unlike his lover boy ones.
Exactly what I was thinking while watching this, and you summed it up really well.
He did koyla and stuff in the 90s too.
He has always been unpredictable
In my opinion he's always been this character driven artist. A large chunk of his career was painted with some beautiful romantic roles but you could see him easily divulge in others even during those times. Movies like Swades being good examples of that. So now the movies he's selected are presenting him in this light but his core remains the same. To adapt to the spirit of the character and plunge into it neck deep.
I wish someone makes Lunchbox-like-film with shah rukh ❤
To be very honest,,, this type of conversations of people like you have destroyed Bollywood.
Time changes cinema changes and audience evolve so, he has to change and it is really good.
Don't stick ur perspectives on SRK. He is not in an age to pull off romantic characters n if he does, it won't be BO friendly. So just enjoy the films and keep loving him.
He's at an age when he can and should do whatever the hell he wants. It's crazy. South mein their stars can continue to do the same old stuff they have been doing for so long and they can still survive on it, and here we have such a dynamic actor with such a great range trying different things for his audience and we want him to stick to a template while also wanting him to give us something different every time? Make up your fucking minds, yaar.
And not to mention, itni discussion ka kya point jab dene bhi 2.5/3 star hi hai tumko.
I don't agree that there have been different versions of SRK like 2.0 or 3.0 as such. He has always struck a fine balance between different genres ever since he debuted. If you see his career trajectory there was a darr between raju ban gaya gentleman and ddlj, there was a Don between KANK and rab ne Bana di jodi. Basically there have always been films like anjaam, baazigar, ram jaane, darr, fan, raees at one end of the spectrum and then there were films like pardes, k2h2, dil toh pagal hai, veer Zaara etc. at the other end of the spectrum. Pathan is no different in that regard and it comes in the same broader category of action oriented slick edgy films like Don, Don 2, Ra One etc. Dunki again comes in the same broader category of light drama films like Swades, dear zindagi, rab ne Bana di jodi etc. So this talk about SRK 2.0 , 3.0 doesn't hold much water honestly.
Couldnt agree more
Having abs doesn't mean he is catering for only people look like that. According to your logic, The Godfather would only for gangsters. Movies are all about entertainment for all people,irrespective of the difference. You guys always look down on SRK just after you say you love him. You should be critical of his movie coming forward not the ones he did before. Thats your job.
Oh god...
Are u all forgetting My Name Is Khan?
When was he the typical macho in Chennai Express?
Or Zero? Or JHMS for that matter?
Do u even remember Dear Zindagi's Dr Jahangir which also convinced many of us to consider therapy?
This podcast discussion is a disservice to SRK.
I thought Anupama atleast would remember man....
He is not just a romatic hero. He was the protagonist, antagonist, romance hero,comedy hero,leader,comman man,massey hero,friend,family man,superhero,patriotic hero. He has done all things. He connected the audience at emotional level. We have multiple kind of emotions. This is SRK
One thing I must say is, they ignored the fact that what kind of films were made post 2007.. Whatever they are are calling SRK 2.0, does RNBDJ fall in that phase of SRK? No. It's a 2008 movie and unique in all therms.. One way to sum up the whole conversation is they don't want SRK to be versatile and want him to be romantic.. Then corms people who say SRK is romancing actresses half of his age, whereas they have no issues when Rajnikanth do so.. This interviews fails to acknowledge the experiments SRK did in this period Ra One, Fan and Zero.. Among these these 3 film, Fan and Zero is nowhere close to high testosterone films.. The ultimate point is, people have such high expectation of SRK which is not a cake of direct generation of directors.. If Zero was hit, we would have got tons of new experimental films for sure.. U can't predict SRK, he is versatile and u should appreciate it instead of calling it lack of his stardom...That was the biggest lol claim of the interview... As if he is the only one who makes everything of his film.. Look at the current phase of bollywood and he has not done remakes since the beginning of his career.. Expected little broader perspective from this interview, therefore I give it 2* out of 5.. 🐸
What rubbish are you people talking. Within 9 minutes you mentioned his name in past tense like 20 times, he was, he was ... HE IS. There have always been ups and downs with everyone and it will continue to be like that because that is what life is. So take a chill pill and enjoy....
There are so many really interesting things that SRK could do now other than action. Personally I would love to see him do a Bela Lugosi style Dracula, a courtroom drama, a detective movie... and I would give anything for one more romantic movie. I want SRK do an age appropriate love story with one of his 90s heroines. He’s aging like a fine wine and he’s a better actor now than he has ever been before. I really believe he could make something beautiful and epic like Veer-Zaara or Jab Tak Hai Jaan if he got the chance. Just give him a character close to his own age that fits his beloved archetype and an actress like Kajol or Madhuri or even Aish and watch the sparks fly. I’m sure Adi could write something lovely. He’s already written at least 5 of SRKs best love stories. Maybe even Karan if Adi won’t do it.
I’d understand if SRK doesn’t want to, but to be honest, there will never be another lover like him. Nobody in 30 years has even come close. He is and will always be the king of romance, and, for me, romance dies with him. I’m not ready to let go of that yet.
Pathaan first day first show 🔥 🔥
Nah Srk should not be focused on romance at this point ,I like his line up
If he do an out and out romantic movie then all these 3 will bash him saying he is too old for this part. At age of 57 what do you expect? Common guys!
These are those people who keep on saying that Khan should do something different and when Khan does something really interesting like Fan, Raees, Zero, Dear Zindagi, then these people say that they miss the 90s and 2000s SRK. WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU??????????? HAVE YOU GUYS COMPLETELY LOST IT OR WHAT???????????????
When do we get critics 2.0
I love him when he is on the edge..The suprise element with sensational stuffs...The hellbent nonconformist.. I hope he redefines a revisionist Shah Rukh Khan..He could have recalibrated the Baazigar and the Darrs for one another time in late 90s but he never did
Om Shanti Om was a very funny film, Chennai was an out and out comedy like Badshah. He did Fan which was like the anti-hero. Zero was him playing romantic charming self and so was When Harry met Sejal. This whole generalization of Shahrukh trying to chase a certain kind of fans is utter BS to put it crudely. This video has been a complete disservice to SRK and all the efforts he has made in the last ten year to do different kind of roles.
Proablem with srk is that he is loved by everyone but for different reasons❤️...and about the limitation of stardom...you are joking buddy🤣
And here comes the hypocrisy of people like Anupama and Rahul desai Unfortunately when he did fan or dear zindagi the critics and audiences never appreciated it enough.
Remember what shahrukh said in the AIB podcast, this rings true. When he did romance audiences got tired of him . And here we are 5 years later he comes back on the screen, and this so called "critics" read too much again into this.
When now he started doing age appropriate roles these people want him to do romance
The abs, the physical transformation seem also a way to prolong the "hero"/protagonist into his 50s. Our male stars do not age, they just "change."
You guys are so fickle minded and so easily swayed. You were the first ones saying he can't do anything other than romance back in the day. And you wanted to see him so something better and branch out. Then he did just that and you didn't appreciate his work. Now you don't want him to go all macho? But you lot will still enjoy watching Salman do the same stuff over and over again? Even better, when stars from the south do similar testosterone-heavy stuff, you guys go all wah-wah about it (and yes, I'm a South Indian). Come on. Give the guy a break. He is SRK! Let's just be happy that he's back doing movies and that we can still go to the big screens and be entertained and enthralled by the King.
three of my favourite people coming together for a podcast on SRK? I am obsesseddd
Most of the celebrities have love and hate relation with media, but surprisingly for SRK case it is "love only" relationship with media. Why? What's the secrets?
Why you guys are obsessed with him playing rahul and Raj he already mentioned in his ig live it now feels odd romancing young girls and rahul n raj is for the younger guys to play.
Stars have to evolve with age so he is doing the same but will also offer us social comedy with dunki,so there is everything for everyone.
And he hasn't done that much out n out action films it's also new for him.
Everytime I see the muscular Shahrukh, I am reminded of an interview of his where he says that he doesn't need muscles, he's got talent! How he and the times have changed!
He has done romance before he took a break of 4 years, he did jab harry met sejal, jab tak hai Jaan, zero and all with great directors, they were all flop. I agree this is a forced change for SRK but this is what audience want to see from him.
Its not limitation of his stardom but its the limitation of the genres.
This is the stupidest 9 minutes of discussion on SRK, I have ever seen. I came expecting something good and informative but then got this. THIS!!!! Didn't expect this from Anupama. Shah Rukh Khan has done something different each n every single time and they just can't appreciate him. They suffer from nostalgia overload. Of course, we all love SRK from the 90s n the 2000s but the guy has done remarkable work in the last decade n from 2007 too. Box office numbers do not dictate how good or bad the actor was. They just tell you whether the film clicked with the audience of the time or not.
SRK ❤
People who started with Swadesh ...how will they understand what's SRK all about 🤣
Exactly! These guys have missed out a lot on who srk is
What he is doing now, he did 4-5 years ago too....when he was criticised for doing films with farah khan or rohit shetty......he did Dear Zindagi, Harry met Sejal, Zero.....it is not his fault that some directors he choose knowing that they make films with strong plot, will choke this hard...he was expecting Jab we met level from imtiaz & tanu weds manu level from anand l rai....but his badluck is just....again he is expecting a War like blockbuster ( critically may be dull but insane on box office) & a good mass film (also pan india i heard) from atlee like 'theri'....& a social comedy like p.k from rajkumar hirani....he always try to get brilliant directors but his luck these days is not working...as an actor you can only 'choose' good filmmaker, it is in his/her hands to make a good movie.
It would be so frustrating for SRK to listen ppl asking him to do the romantic roles again, cuz when he was doing everyone was like ki wahi same cheez baar baar kar raha hai, usko kuch alag karna chahiye when he tries something hatke, doing films like fan, zero, dear zindagi, those films don't do well at the box office, and now he is doing something massy, still ppl have problem.
And my pov is ki aaj ke din audience is not much into romantic movies, everything has it's own time, now ppl want to see mass action, or anything which gives them adrenaline rush. And he's 57, he can't be doing romantic films, boycott gang is just there finding his mistakes just troll him.
So you want him to be a soft man, almost like a man child,
Than what about being dynamic in his filmography
I quite disagree with this analysis. Om Shanti Om came out in 2007. Up until Pathaan, SRK was making remarkable movies like My Name is Khan, Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi, Billu, Dear Zindagi, Zero and Fan. None of these movies had him showing off his abs. They were fascinating, mature films that showed him developing as an actor, departing from the earlier mold. Now in his 50s we get to see him as the buff action hero, a role he has said he always wanted to play, in the kind of films that his kids like to watch. As an older woman, I love seeing this great actor pushing himself to be at his peak, physically, even while joking around about aging. I hope it inspires us all.
*Please don't replace the Late Take with PopCorn Podcast*
I can’t agree more that Shah Rukh is now only catering to men. As a woman who saw Shah Rukh in her adolescence in Dil toh Pagal hai, kkhh, Ddlj, pardes and dil se he is my unsaid unfound hero. Now the only thing I watch of his is how he speaks in interviews and sees off people at his parties. I miss my shah rukh ☹️I miss my Aamir from qsqt, dil, dil hai ke manta nehi 😢I miss my Salman 😢 from Maine pyaar kiya. These action hero roles Ajay and Akshay and others can do but I want my khans to b that guy who they were in the late 80s and 90s 😢😢😢😢😢😢😢
There are a number of factors that forces an actor to take different shapes. If he or she continues to do the same type of roles, we don't like that. Also, we don't appreciate them doing romantic roles after a certain age. We criticize them for not doing Swades or Chak De India types of movies, but at the same time when they come up with these kinds of movies, we don't support them.
U know post covid I think there's no market for romantic comedy films in the main stream.. we have so many streaming services. People now only go to the theatre when they wna be wowed. All these tamil films in 2022 have showed that to us. I think That's what srk is targeting. I would gladly watch a ddlj or k3g at home under sheets with a coffee in my hand. But I would definitely go to a cinema hall to watch bahubali or rrr or pathaan
Pathaan on 25th January and 20th January advance booking starting in india
The only actor that shed my tears is SRK that’s why he is my favorite actor of all time
The "I'm an employee of Shahrukh Khan" line was first used by Zoya in Luck by Chance...by the Hrithik character
Surprisingly shallow analysis for 2 reasons :
1. The so-called SRK 2.0 after Om Shanti Om rarely played the "muscular and masculine roles". After 2007, he did Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi, My Name is Khan, Dear Zindagi, Fan, Zero, Jab Harry Met Sejal.
2. The critics said that SRK should stop playing romantic roles.
SRK has fans who expect different things from him. The fact is that the majority of the fans now want to see him as a superstar in a larger-than-life role.
Acc to time you have to changes or audience won't see movie . now a days audience won't accept typical romantic movie so he has changed him and that's right decision i think😇
Can u guys just let him do what he wants to do and shut up? Don’t watch his action movies he ain’t doing that for u
Lol. He is 57. So how do you guys expect him to do a romantic film again? That era is gone. Now SRK should reinvent himself just like Kamal Hasan sir.
You want the romantic SRK, but when he does a film like JHMS, everyone starts complaining.
Moreover, he wasn't doing the same thing in the last decade. He was trying different types of roles post OSM. MINK, FAN, Zero, Dear Zindagi, even JHMS
Age factor changed everything
There are no 2.0 or 3.0. There is only one SRK who has always been the same and who is for some reason unable to understand what the audience wants. He is still perceived as a Romantic hero. Also, he is considered to be the biggest superstar ever but looking at his performances both as an actor or at the box-office, his record is pretty much average. There are more of his bad films and bad performances than his good ones. Nonetheless, it is not that he isn't a good actor but even a good actor needs a good director. Just look at his best performances, all of them had very good directors. The problem is SRK still looks at the numbers rather than the content.
Pathaan movie all time blockbuster record breaking
Until the director, producers, critics, and tastemakers genuinely elevate the young generation as the new stars of the era, the primary ticket purchasers will still look to the stars of yesteryear to define cinema for them. The same ppl who were the lead directors, producers, and critics in the 90s and 00s are still the primary players today, so naturally they want to cling to the familiar bankable stars. They need to instead expand their imagination and inject life into new blood.
Exactly, the other industries are flourishing with talent and creativity, passion with the influx of younger generation of actors and directors. In Bollywood that’s not the case the same few people control the industry and suppress new talent.
Srk ❤️
Because he is OLD my friend . In an action movie , you can look tired and haggard for a few scenes and that’s okay .
We need full audio and video please 🙏🙏 listen what Rogan said about that 😁😁👍👍👍
Hey Shishupal, thank you for listening! You can listen to the full podcast here: link.chtbl.com/FCPopCornEp1
@@FilmCompanionReviews so full video is available their like joe Rogan experience
First day first show
Brilliant podcast & intelligent guests!
Disagree with them,he has not 'only' catered to the masses,just see the directors he has worked in the last decade
কিং শাহরুখ খান
So, I am the only one who has seen all episodes of Fauji and Circus.
He has done dear zindagi and raees too in the last 10 yrs those were experimental as well. Also MNIK. This podcast didnt do justice to Srks filmography at all
His time is gone..nation is bored of khans ...we like now real stars from South
We need an episode on Diljit
King 👑💖 always King 👑👑
There is no way human can be satisfied with anything. When, he is doing romance oh the same romance same love story do something different and then when he does other genres oh please we wont the same old SRK anything that has ruined his past few years are double standard people who are never happy and satisfied with anything and appreciate others hardworks let the man breathe and do the cinemas of his choice 😏😏😏😏😏
Employ of the Myth of SRK is so so cynical self indulgent
Hearing the old hows it going bros is 10
i loved this podcast
Thank you
Srk
Just like Virat Kohli, SRK too has become a victim of his own success.
Not a full episode…Anupama are you cheating on Us 😢?
A "9" min podcast¿
Full podcast out on all podcast platforms. Link: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/are-we-ready-for-shah-rukh-khan-3-0/id1665257150?i=1000594832097
Have neither time nor interest to deeply think of who actors are in real life. I just want entertainment from Movies 🎬 I chose to watch
No hullabaloo about actors
Me n my group of ladies waiting to watch this one next irrespective of anything
SRK didn’t needed to do a movie like Pathaan he has tried different concepts like Fan RAONE and Zero what he needed to was to polish those concept
@@amd.amdamd yes u r on point and badass roles suits on him also
Didnt need*
He had done a Pathan before as well. A soldier fighting a terrorist team. How is this a new version. The way they talk about him is as if they are discussing quantam physics.
These clowns are asking an actor who is 58 years of age to do romance what kind of thinking they have I can't understand.. i love srk now doing the Film which justifies his stardom people move on and change at different times of life and srk in now turned into a box office monster which is good for him in my opinion.. such a trash discussion 🥴
PATHAAN BLUCKBUSTER 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
you higher class people why you think you own srk...........srk never was and will be high class role model....he is and was and he will be middle class role model
Leaving aside Anupama, she was clearly trying to be on the with the other 2 boys. But come on boy’s do some more research, its SRK’s 3 decades of successful career you are talking about!
These new kids will not understand what SrK was back in 2000s..
Judging srk post Om shanti om is strange and kinda childish..
Your opinion doesn't matter at all. You're just putting your thoughts, on how u wanted to see him on the screen. It's like having Dal - Chawal again and again. And u can't be doing the same roles considering he's now 57 . And today the audience wants to see never ever seen content on the big screen. So, whatever he's choosing now will be great anyhow. Anupama Mam pls throw these 2 chapri boys immediately.
puspa movie masculinity k vagah se hit hui ? 😂mtlb story, creativity, song music sab bhad m gaya
hero ka six pack se movie hit nhi hoti h 😭
Story n creativity kya tha bhai pushpa me
Puspa masculinity and world building k karan chali thi
Respectfully I disagree. I think a star who is also a good actor/perfomer always chooses to do all kinds of films. We can't expect a 57 years old guy to do romance!! If he consciously took an effort to cater to SRK 2.0 audience, then it's his choice. I'm his fan still I hated his recent films. If it's a good movie, then I don't have the baggage of charming SRK in my mind. Shahid, Ranbir are also following similar pattern though
SRK should never ever do another romantic movie ever again. Next year SRK should do some serious films or character roles, or maybe do a movie without any song and dance. Suspense thriller, heavy drama where he does not do over acting. More movies like Sawdes/Chak de/MNIK. Character roles not romantic hero/action hero/comedy hero.
A VCF film? you mean VVC. At about 8 mins
Yet another day of Rahul being sensible and insightful and not just being opinionated
He's 57. He can't keep playing a hero romancing the women like he used to. I mean - do we want to see him chatting up 50yr old women? Would that sell tickets? So he has had to find another niche. And, actually, he never wanted to do romantic films -- he ALWAYS wanted to be an action hero. But, yes, they could stop filming his abs in every dance sequence - that's kinda boring now -- especially when they use make-up to enhance the muscles -- that just looks ridiculous.
female hero, feminine hero and feminist hero are different things, dont use them interchangebly.
I hope he works with a female director