Nobody can be trusted with it. Americans think they’re the good guys, Russians think they’re the good guys. Americans think Russians are brainwashed, Russians think Americans are brainwashed, we all think you’re both brainwashed hahaha
I hate Russia for it's fascism, and mostly fascist brainwashed cruel people. Meanwhile i also hate the US for being too powerful, therefore trying to control everything in the world. Historically thinking, they're both causing the most problems in the world. If you wonder what about me, i''m Russian. Never said i'm a patriot, or that i have any friends.
I’m a female from a wee village in the Scottish highlands. I live next to a weapons testing range for NATO underwater weapons. An Astute Class submarine from our Royal Navy grounded close to my home in 2011. I learned a lot about what one nuclear weapon would do to a carrier strike group by reading a book by Patrick Robinson called Nimitz Class. He has a whole heap of, (fictional), books he wrote about the whole sneakiness of underwater warfare and I only discovered his books when I was very poorly in 2002 when I was pregnant and had to spend a long time in hospital. Someone had left HMS Unseen, his book about Kilo/Upholder type submarines, and I was hooked. This wee video is on a par with Robinson for explaining in great detail that even muppets like myself can understand! I enjoyed this very much and if you get a chance to read his books, I definitely recommend Nimitz Class, HMS Unseen, Kilo Class…..all excellent reads.
That's is a very good example of what would happen to the world if people of GOD have no peace to one another.If we follow JESUS CHRIST 's teaching about love for one another, the world would have nothing to fear
@@emmanuelmicheni2211 Does religion really have anything to do with a fictional scenario where two super powerful nations enter into war and launch nukes at each other?
Other Infographics Show episodes coming out this week: "Life in a nuclear wasteland: Year One" "How a nuclear bunker would be basically useless in a nuclear war" "Russia nuked us. Here's what happens to the government" "How to pay back your student loans in the event of nuclear war"
My basic training in the Swedish Army (I am a Swede-turned- American) prepared me to be a signal squad leader on a Military District Staff. At the time Sweden had six MDS, which is a territorial Corps level staff. Our A-plats (Primary Staff Location) wa's a deep underground bunker. Secondary location would be a mobile headquarters unit. The most humorous part was when our training officer told us that we would probably not have to use the secondary one, because that primary one was so safe. He said "it is alleged to fully withstand a nuclear detonation". The look on his face when he said that was priceless.
Fun fact, all surface Navy ships have a sprinkler system that is triggered either before or right after a nuclear detonation to prevent fallout from touching the outer surfaces of the ships, making de-con either easier or not necessary. The sprinklers basically create a force field of water around the ships against said fallout. Edit: Since a few of you needed it, I expanded on the "force field" bit.
The good thing about this scenario is it's highly unlikely only the cruiser would engage the ICBM, as the Carrier Group likely also has 1-3 Arleigh Burke DDGs, which would also have SM3 and SM6 missiles.
A normal carrier strike group CSG is the carrier plus air wing, 1 cruiser, 3/4 destroyers and 1 sub. The Ticonderoga class cruisers (the only ones we have) are all old and slowly being decommissioned. They were amazing platforms
@@ronjones9447 They are old, but they are by no means useless, and my point still stands. They would not be the only ships acting to defend against such a strike, so really the scenario as it plays out in this video is unrealistic.
@@Sanderford I did not say or mean useless, to be honest I think with the tension with China they should be extended 10 more years. Tell me what you think, the CSG escorts cannot replenish their SM2,SM3 or SM6 missiles at sea. I would think a surface ship, able to keep up with the CSG and have 400 missiles in VLS cells with launch capability only, they would be directed by the other aegis ships. My concern is 1 major attack and all the escorts would need replenishment. Even manned by a civilian crew, I really don’t care but able to provide maximum missile capacity with secure link/communication
topol m is designed to target cities. Not a carrier group. The kinzhals are the one who is responsible on taking carrier. For the chinese, the df 17 and Yg 3 is responsible for the carrier. The nuclear icbm is for annihilation.
You missed one of the most important defensive aspects. The full ship washdown system. It douses the ship in sea water constantly to stop fallout landing on and contaminating it. Without it the ship can become unusable.
@@AshThaks Her 93,284-long-ton (94,781 t)[5] displacement ranks her class as the third-heaviest carrier class, after the Nimitz class and the Gerald R. Ford class. Enterprise had a crew of some 4,600 service members. Straight off the first paragraph on Wikipedia buddy
I'd have to admit...@@AshThaks isn't exactly a name which I would feel comfortable sharing ANY type of classified intel with (No offense, @Aishwarya Singh Thakur)
It's just their way of telling the world governments , " Come on guys , we already know your plans. Now you have to try something else ". CRISIS AVERTED ( temporarily ) 😄🥶
This video, like all others produced by this company, is intelligently researched and presented. The situations described can really happen today. And let's not forget the narrator. His concise reading is the best part of the video.
It's well put together and well presented, but makes no sense whatsoever. Up to the decision to use nuclear weapons - maaaybe. But if Russia did decide to go nuclear and did so by aiming a single rocket directly at NATO forces to make a point? Even in such an unlikely, convoluted scenario, there's just no way they'd pick a US carrier strike group sailing on the opposite side of the world, with no connection to the war in Ukraine.
@@Eliastion Yeah, it makes sense. We cant predict what Putin will do, since hes unstable. Plus, its just an example of what could happen with Nuclear bombs. If Russia launches nukes, carrier strike group may be not the first target, but it will be a target for sure.
Very insightful. Something we all need to be prepared for. I enjoy your scenarios. I hope they are just that. As a 1st grader, hearing that dreadful wailing siren filled me with so much fear. "Get under your desks! Hands over your heads!" It traumatized me in some ways. Even today if I hear that particular sound, my heart skips a beat. God bless you all.
RIGHT ON THE MONEY, SINCE THERE NO MORE NEED FOR EDCATION, IVE INVESTED IN SCHOOL DESKS IN CASE OF A THRERMAL NUCULAR I WILL SELL THE ONLY SAFE PLACE TOO HIDE.
I remember in Northern Saskatchewan Canada at the residential school how we used to do drills to hide under our desk in case a nuclear bomb fell even in grade one or two I used to think to myself this is ridiculous we will be vaporized what's the point of getting under the desk
Go back to seventy-four in which the British parliament sent out a pamphlet telling us what to do when the bomb dropped. One part was to hoard food beneath stairs, a months worth, another was to get a black plastic bin bag and put it over the door to shield from the rays of the blast. It made me laugh then, now even more so. As though anyone would ever be alive. To be alive is a Hollywood myth, not reality.
That may be so. But videos like these send the wrong message to society. The video gives the mistaken impression that NATO forces are totally superior to Russian forces, and that in the case of conflict NATO is likely to win. But in real life there will most likely be total mutual annihilation. In general, this video shows a lot of things wrong. For example, Russia will not strike the U.S. Navy with a ballistic missile, they will do it with a much smaller and less visible hypersonic missile, which is impossible to intercept for the NATO missile defense. And I would like to point out that NATO does not have hypersonic weapons, unlike Russia. Also in case of a serious conflict Russia can instantly disable all NATO satellite tracking systems, simply by resorting to high-altitude nuclear explosions (recall that high-altitude nuclear explosions allow to disable electronics located in orbit very effectively and on a monstrous scale). Therefore I believe that it is extremely harmful to release videos like this, which will cultivate in people a superiority complex and immerse them in illusions. On the contrary, it is necessary to think how to build a world where it will not be necessary to threaten each other with weapons.
@@lilith4961 According to who? The Western media? Don't trust anything they say or show. But even if the propaganda would be true, it doesn't need great talent or effort to fire nuks, and that would be it.
I learned from a icbm documentary that the warheads aren't self propelled. The missile gets to about 800 miles up, then the warheads are aimed and then free fall for hundreds of miles, accelerating to thousands of miles an hour, so they are almost impossible to shoot down. Horrible and beautiful technology.
@@jypsridic I think theres a reason the Soviet Union/Russia makes such a big deal about U.S. missile shield in and around Europe, I think the US probably downplays its ability to intercept nukes.
@@jeansdelajeans3937 I wouldn't even make a video like that to begin with and even if, for the sake of argument, I would, then I'd definitely not use any hypotheticals and suppositions to begin with since they are completely pointless and overall useless. One of Murphy's laws (originally "concocted" by the Greek philosopher named Diodorus) clearly states that whatever can happen, will happen. So at the end of the day, it's just a matter of time. And choosing to spend said time by creating hypothetical scenarios is yet another example of wasted time. The trick is to just go about your day and try your best to not get stuck inside vicious circles such as this one, where you constantly worry about things that even though will most likely happen, will also probably not happen during your lifetime. It's too much philosophy to get into, but you get the gist.
Not the carrier! What about all those sailors who were just freely navigating? The narrator and writers also did a great job with pacing, setting up, & dilvering the suspense.
I thought that too but I think it would depend on if the nearest friendly airbase was within the range of the jets. Pacific ocean is pretty big and a quick google search puts an F/A-18 Hornet's maximum range at 1300 to 1800 miles depending on speed, load and how much fuel they have. Could easily be a scenario where the carrier strike group is too far from a friendly airbase for the planes to take off.
@@Gilthwixt1 In the scenario in the video, they said it was "crossing south of Japan on its way towards the South China Sea for routine freedom of navigation exercises." They should easily be within range of Guam or Okinawa, I would think.
Good video. I like the setup and how you treated the threat to the battle group. The only thing is that there is no way possible to get the aircraft below decks as there isn't enough room. I made 5 deployments onboard CV's in the Pacific and into the I.O. and in a couple of them we even left a few planes back a Cubi Point because the decks had become so crowded. The other thing is that not knowing the wind across the deck from the pressure wave I can't say you're wrong about the loss of aircraft but on a couple of those deployments we did go into typhoons. We chained the aircraft very heavily and didn't have any real damage.
There is an inaccuracy I would like to mention. The carrier would be firing SM3's not SM6's, the SM3's are designed specifically to intercept ballistic missiles, and is what they would fire in this situation. Just wanted to point that out for future reference.
The stuff of nightmares. Imagine turning on the news one day only to see that major cities across the world is being reduced to ruins by these bombs. It's not often i get anxious about stuff happening in the world. But what's happening in Ukraine and the relations between Russia and NATO, it's no joke. We're back to the cuban missile crisis now, if not beyond that point.
I think the same waking up to Russia dropping some small nukes in Ukraine. Basically putin said that will happen if the areas he just claimed russia are attacked by nato weapons. We can't respond nuclear.
As someone living in a european capital city center, I don't need to worry much about that. I will be inside the initial strike fireball and will be simply vaporized immediately.
Question: At around 9:40, you say the carrier would start lowering their aircraft down below decks to shield them from the incoming missile. Wouldn't it make more sense for an emergency scramble launch of all aircraft as well? If they could also save a few planes that way since once off the deck, the fighters could go to full afterburner and put distance between themselves and the carrier group?
there won't be a full-blown all-out nuke war, that destroys the entire planet, i can guarantee you that, but there will be catastrophise. mostly man made. some will be natural, and the last one will be divine intervention. book of revelations gives you the truth.
Many Japanese people take peace for granted for a long time in spite of tense atmosphere in the world. But this video shows that Japan could be one of major targets of nuclear strikes because of close military tie with the United States. Japanese people need to take all possible countermeasures against the worst scenario.
These military vids are getting better and better but the scary thing is we could be heading down this road so are you going to do a part 2 or 3 for this vid and what about afterwards and what about a vid on how fast our tech is evolving and are you going to do anything for the 4th of July?
The RT-2PM2 Topol-M carries a 1 megaton warhead. Seems kind of excessive to use on a carrier strike group. A low yield tactical warhead even in the single digit kilotons would achieve the same goal.
@@pranayjha9224 ?? I'm not sure if that's a question? If so then of course not. This "scenario" had Russia using an ICBM from the 80s targeting a naval fleet that it could almost see from it's shores. Kinda silly and underestimating the enemy as the original poster commented
@@pranayjha9224 with their tiny 60 billion dollar / year military budget where 75% of the money is re-routed into corrupt politicians pockets? yeah, their forces must be "terrifying". Do you know what the American military budget is? Ya'd better look it up, joker.
Forget it, the author of the video doesn’t even know that Russia’s nuclear forces are now the best in the world, the United States has just begun modernization. And he also relies on the fact that the United States has some kind of secret technology, perhaps the author of the video does not know, but all important computer equipment in the Russian Federation is its own (not Intel, not AMD), the United States simply cannot hack them or somehow pull out information through backdoors in the chips of their companies.
plus the sips reacting immediately. several mirvd missiles would be used, and the battle group is dispersed to prevent this kind of thing. That means that missing is difficult, but sinking the group with a nuclear bomb is not feasible
@@charles8769 I think this channel really has an imperialist bent. It can still be informative, if viewed with that cautionary asterix, but it has definitely thrown itself fully down the "capitaltism = good, communism = bad" rabbit hole.
So.... Is it normal to attack Russia from local parts of countries cause we are protecting our own borders and citizens wich been attaked from Ukraine with NATO-US support. Why Israel is safe now after so many years of attacks into civilians in Palestine and Syria?
Small correction: The warhead's re-entry speed is around 7000 meters/second not 1700 meters/second. Comment: You presented basically one of the top favorable scenarios where there was only one missile used to which the warhead is successfully intercepted above the sea with only a few people dying.
Exactly, Russian missiles are infamous for their heavy throw weights, and as a result the large warhead capacities they have. In real life it would have launched at least 10 or more warheads.
Only far range Russian IBM can maneuver at such speeds* But Russia have "Кинжал" a hypersonic missile that is placed on fighter jets with small nuclear warhead (the non-nuclear version of which destroyed Ukrainian air defenses at the beginning of the war) And only after neutralized Air Defense IBM they will fly up to the target
@@hippy1002 7.000 meter/second is 25.200 km/hour. An ICBM definitely hits speeds of about 18.000-25.000 km/hr just after apogee and on the way down into the atmosphere.
Scary , but probably the first set of nukes will be sent against any areas that can retaliate back with nukes. I don't think any country would send one just to send a message by destroying an aircraft carrier. Good vid though.
I wouldn't put it past North Korea though. The upside of the nuclear arms race has always been MAD.... I think even Pakistan and India were worried about it. But I think the idea of not launching nukes for fear of retaliation went out the window with North Korea and it certainly will if Iran ever gets one.
As we know, the US has more than one carrier strike group. At least three in the Pacific. What do you think the other battle groups would be doing, including the issue of an EAM to the boomers. Trust me it would not be pretty and Russia's Pacific bases would cease to exist. A more likely scenario would be a Russian nuclear first strike against NATO eastern countries like Poland and Russia would suddenly have a war with a front line of several thousand miles. The Kola peninsula, Kaliningrad and Sevastopol naval bases would be destroyed. To continue the Russians would have go strategic and MAD would kick in
If Russia launched a nuclear missile into the mainland US, the American people would for the first time understand the serious catastrophe of the atomic bombs that the US dropped on Japan in 1945. I really look forward to that day.
I'm American and I know Russia has made themselves and their equipment look pathetic, but I still feel this video shows the best case scenario and we don't really know what Russia is capable of.
The main problem is that as an American, you only know and see what your media shows. And the American media are massively biased and present information in a way that benefits their government or at least their party(republicans or democrats). And the most unpleasant thing is that most Americans don't even have the opportunity to check the information themselves, because they don't know either Russian or Ukrainian language.
For example, you've probably been shown destroyed shopping malls and damaged apartment buildings, telling you that it's the Russians who have inaccurate weapons and are desperate to hit anything in their sights. In reality, this sort of thing has a lot to do with the fact that the Ukrainian military often uses civilian sites to deploy military equipment, because they know that the Russians will think twice before hitting it. And if something goes wrong, they can once again accuse Russia of war crimes and attacking civilians. Also they don't tell you about the military losses of the Ukrainian army, and they don't explain how with all the help that you provide and with the numerical and strategic advantage Ukraine cannot throw Russia out of its territory. I don't want to go into details now, because my comment will probably be automatically hidden by RUclips (freedom of speech in all its glory), but you must understand that for Russians this whole situation is a tragedy, primarily because many have close relatives in Ukraine. And at the center of this tragedy is your government. Even more so than Putin.
realistically for an attack on a carrier strike group russia would more likely use a submarine based short range cruise missile small nuke or go full blast and use it's 2 megaton stealth nuclear torpedo (who's existence has been confirmed by the pentagon)
Keep taking the koolaid m8, the only time Russia would use nukes were if it was attacked with nukes first, for that show I suggest you use the USA as it's only country to consider first strike plans.
Well his life. The lifes of his family. His position as president. The majority of his population. St. Petersburg, Moscow. The kremlin palace itself. That are the things he will loose. If he want's to lose all of that so yeah, continue doing what you're doing Putin.
23 hours before launch the news reaches the desk of the president of the United States.. He takes a bite of jello, poops his pants and then asks "who..um why doesn't my jello have the little thingies or Christmas gifts and swimming pools, hey boy?"
Not completely. There are several different strike group configs and further differences between tactical and strategic. The commanding officers have less power to make the decisions than they did during the USSR
Hi Slav. "Their" means.... People. Like ..."it's their problem not mine" and "they're". Ex. They're really having a good time!" And "there" if you look over there, you'll find the treasure!" I volunteer to assist people in learning English. I'm not a teacher, just help out. Take care!
And that’s why the US hasn’t enacted a no fly zone and likely won’t retaliate against Russia via article 5 if it’s equipment convoys get attacked in Ukraine
Topol-m? That’s an intercontinental missile. Way too big and old and slow and not real an anti-ship weapons. If Russia wants to hit a carrier - hypersonic Kinzal rocket will be used. Far smaller, much faster, harder to intercept and with a tactical nuke warhead. Launched from air, from 2000km away.
What a time to be alive....it's a surreal. I'm not too concerned with dying, but it's living in a post nuclear attack world is what scares me because I think that will be worse than death. There are the physical challenges that people will have to overcome, but maybe worse are the psychological challenges. Everything you've ever known will have changed in a moment with no hopes of going back to how it used to be any time soon.
Not saying any of this would be funny but. Could you imagine Russia pushing the button and they all instantly blow up taking Russia out the picture with there own unmaintained nukes. It's a very big possibility
That 50% intercept rate from the ages system is with no chaff or countermeasures from the missile it’s less that 40% with any even outdated countermeasures
A carrier would have more than one aegis capable ship in it's sector, vastly increasing accuracy through network sharing. Though I understand the plot of it as a former aegis tech on those ships you are vastly underplaying their capabilities. Keep up the good content though
and you seriously undermine the strenght of the russian nuclear capabilities using ukraine operation to judge overall military strenght is a grave error, its like using vietnam and Afghanistan to judge american military
@@Benjamin-kn7hq nothing in my statement addresses or claims to address russian capabilities, only a carrier with an aegis fleet around it, so I fail to see what your point is
@@Disorder2312 Well, if its a low value target, yes. But to be sure, you would send the second one. They have so many, why would you save any…for a rainy day? lol.
Pretty sure that IF Russia launched nukes, they wouldnt be older models to begin with. Russia would want the greatest chance of the most successful hits so they would use their new hypersonic weapons with a heck of a lot more than 4 warheads. I believe a LOT of this video also overestimates the power and technology of the west and underestimates Russian tech
My brother just got a transfer off the carrier in that strike group to be on a destroyer that’ll be in that same strike group, idk if I feel like he’ll be safer on the smaller ship. Those carriers are like nuclear resistant bunkers, nearly indestructible.
An ICBM warhead will not hit a carrier or other vessel directly, it has no radar guidance or similar means of tracking a moving object in the final phase of the flight. It can not "see" any vessel of the strike group. It will be guided to a predetermined point via inertial guidance and gps(western)/glonass(russian). Given the flight time and the speed the vessels it is more likely to explode several miles away. It will always explode in the air above maximizing the damage done by the shockwave. If its a really lucky shot directly above the carrier (highly unlikely) you will have a burning cracked hulk of steel below it, but the possibility of such high damage quickly reduces with more distance. if the warhead explodes within a few kilometers like shown here, larger vessels will withstand the blow but be rendered out of combat due to damage on the super structures, radar etc. but its highly unlikely that a single ICBM will do that because it simply lacks the abillity to precicely hit in the first place. naval vessels are much more in danger from submarines and missiles fired from bombers.
Go to 1:32 and look at how accurate they've depicted Boris Johnson's hair!! 😄😄 I love how this channel pays attention to detail and occasionally throws in a few goodies like this in their videos.
I’d say George Santayana would agree since he was the creator of this coined phrase from 1905, OF COURSE IT IS MOST FAMOUSLY REMEMBERED WHEN Churchill used it as a part of his speech in 48’.
Not a nuclear bomb. It's a "special military projectile."
Good one 👍
I thought 'special military projectile' was what Putin named his
Frrr this comment killed me… that’s what they would say ! They are crazy
@@TheBestDog 😂😂😂
No. it's a warhead
It’s amazing how intelligent both countries are. Too bad it’s wasted on world ending technology
Very sad
Extremely sad and embarrassing
Nobody can be trusted with it. Americans think they’re the good guys, Russians think they’re the good guys.
Americans think Russians are brainwashed, Russians think Americans are brainwashed, we all think you’re both brainwashed hahaha
Nah Russia dumb af
I hate Russia for it's fascism, and mostly fascist brainwashed cruel people. Meanwhile i also hate the US for being too powerful, therefore trying to control everything in the world. Historically thinking, they're both causing the most problems in the world. If you wonder what about me, i''m Russian. Never said i'm a patriot, or that i have any friends.
I’m a female from a wee village in the Scottish highlands. I live next to a weapons testing range for NATO underwater weapons. An Astute Class submarine from our Royal Navy grounded close to my home in 2011. I learned a lot about what one nuclear weapon would do to a carrier strike group by reading a book by Patrick Robinson called Nimitz Class. He has a whole heap of, (fictional), books he wrote about the whole sneakiness of underwater warfare and I only discovered his books when I was very poorly in 2002 when I was pregnant and had to spend a long time in hospital. Someone had left HMS Unseen, his book about Kilo/Upholder type submarines, and I was hooked. This wee video is on a par with Robinson for explaining in great detail that even muppets like myself can understand! I enjoyed this very much and if you get a chance to read his books, I definitely recommend Nimitz Class, HMS Unseen, Kilo Class…..all excellent reads.
That's is a very good example of what would happen to the world if people of GOD have no peace to one another.If we follow JESUS CHRIST 's teaching about love for one another, the world would have nothing to fear
@@emmanuelmicheni2211 Does religion really have anything to do with a fictional scenario where two super powerful nations enter into war and launch nukes at each other?
@@remymabboux6480 of course,Remy,if both can negotiate and practice the law of GOD about love for one another
Thanks, it has been a long time since I have read that genre.
@@emmanuelmicheni2211 If we all did that Russia would not need weapons to rule the world.
Other Infographics Show episodes coming out this week:
"Life in a nuclear wasteland: Year One"
"How a nuclear bunker would be basically useless in a nuclear war"
"Russia nuked us. Here's what happens to the government"
"How to pay back your student loans in the event of nuclear war"
The last one made me laugh thanks for that 😅
In the event of a nuclear war at least we know the meme's will be good haha
The IRS actually has a contingency plan so we'll continue having to pay taxes even if we destroy ourselves
😂😂😂
🤣😂😆 that made me laugh! Roaches and student loans will be the only survivors of nuclear ☢️ war!
My basic training in the Swedish Army (I am a Swede-turned- American) prepared me to be a signal squad leader on a Military District Staff. At the time Sweden had six MDS, which is a territorial Corps level staff. Our A-plats (Primary Staff Location) wa's a deep underground bunker. Secondary location would be a mobile headquarters unit. The most humorous part was when our training officer told us that we would probably not have to use the secondary one, because that primary one was so safe. He said "it is alleged to fully withstand a nuclear detonation". The look on his face when he said that was priceless.
Fun fact, all surface Navy ships have a sprinkler system that is triggered either before or right after a nuclear detonation to prevent fallout from touching the outer surfaces of the ships, making de-con either easier or not necessary. The sprinklers basically create a force field of water around the ships against said fallout.
Edit: Since a few of you needed it, I expanded on the "force field" bit.
What ?
@@alantorres2256 water is very effective at washing away contamination from nuclear fallout so the ships have sprinkler systems to make cleanup easier
Do you know if it’s a pump like system of seawater that can constantly flow? I’m curious about it now.
This really is a fun fact
No such thing as a water based force field…..
The Boris Johnson Characture has killed me forever !!! BRILLIANT
RIP
BJ resembles a character from Harry Potter.
No offense intended.
The good thing about this scenario is it's highly unlikely only the cruiser would engage the ICBM, as the Carrier Group likely also has 1-3 Arleigh Burke DDGs, which would also have SM3 and SM6 missiles.
A normal carrier strike group CSG is the carrier plus air wing, 1 cruiser, 3/4 destroyers and 1 sub. The Ticonderoga class cruisers (the only ones we have) are all old and slowly being decommissioned. They were amazing platforms
@@ronjones9447 They are old, but they are by no means useless, and my point still stands. They would not be the only ships acting to defend against such a strike, so really the scenario as it plays out in this video is unrealistic.
@@Sanderford I did not say or mean useless, to be honest I think with the tension with China they should be extended 10 more years. Tell me what you think, the CSG escorts cannot replenish their SM2,SM3 or SM6 missiles at sea. I would think a surface ship, able to keep up with the CSG and have 400 missiles in VLS cells with launch capability only, they would be directed by the other aegis ships. My concern is 1 major attack and all the escorts would need replenishment. Even manned by a civilian crew, I really don’t care but able to provide maximum missile capacity with secure link/communication
topol m is designed to target cities. Not a carrier group. The kinzhals are the one who is responsible on taking carrier. For the chinese, the df 17 and Yg 3 is responsible for the carrier. The nuclear icbm is for annihilation.
You forgot the most important part when the alien spacecraft shoot and disable the Russian missile with energy beams. Crisis over.
Didn't Marjorie Taylor Green say that it is the Jews that control the space lasers ? 🙂
😆😅😅
You predict the aliens are not on Russia's side..... that's your flaw.
Russia did experiments on captured beings from far away ,,
You missed one of the most important defensive aspects. The full ship washdown system. It douses the ship in sea water constantly to stop fallout landing on and contaminating it. Without it the ship can become unusable.
NATO can't fight against Russia China India middle East it's can only fight with small countries.
Russian just aiming on California in usa and uk with nuclear weapons and war will be over
@@frozensmile6563 meow
@@frozensmile6563 uh huh. Sorry you're not American 🤣
@@frozensmile6563 From how the Americans roughed up the Middle East for 2 buildings and a dent in the Pentagon, I'd rather not look forward to it.
Just so you know. A fully loaded CVN has a crew of over 5200.... not 2600 like you guys showed. Even without the air wings, we crew more than 3000
Any more classified intel you wanna tell?
@@AshThaks It took 5 seconds to google those numbers. I hardly think it's much of a secret.
@@AshThaks Her 93,284-long-ton (94,781 t)[5] displacement ranks her class as the third-heaviest carrier class, after the Nimitz class and the Gerald R. Ford class. Enterprise had a crew of some 4,600 service members.
Straight off the first paragraph on Wikipedia buddy
I'd have to admit...@@AshThaks isn't exactly a name which I would feel comfortable sharing ANY type of classified intel with (No offense, @Aishwarya Singh Thakur)
They don't know what they are talking about
Apocalypse start in December 2012 ❌
Apocalypse start in December 2022 ✔️
aged not well
@@rajveerkanojiya2985
Happy 10 years Apocalypse anniversary.
I don't know how they'd launch a nuclear bomb, but I have a pretty good idea how they would launch thousands of nuclear missiles.
Gotta love when Infographics goes the extra mile to cheer us up!
Edit: 1.2k likes? Thanks everyone. This took off like an ICBM!
You think this would’ve been a “cheery” episode? 😂🤭
@Gambit Odsey seriously? “Libtards” is still being used? How elementary! 🤣🤣🤣
@@YoungWildShottas you HAVE to be a child 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@Gambit Odsey why r u sooooo quiet now?? Cats’ got ur tongue?
It's just their way of telling the world governments , " Come on guys , we already know your plans. Now you have to try something else ". CRISIS AVERTED ( temporarily ) 😄🥶
You might as well change the name of this channel to the nuke show
Truth
Mfs only talking about nuclear wars
Nah the James show would be better
@@rickybarrientos8289 yes
With Kim Jong un as the logo
This video, like all others produced by this company, is intelligently researched and presented. The situations described can really happen today. And let's not forget the narrator. His concise reading is the best part of the video.
It's well put together and well presented, but makes no sense whatsoever.
Up to the decision to use nuclear weapons - maaaybe. But if Russia did decide to go nuclear and did so by aiming a single rocket directly at NATO forces to make a point? Even in such an unlikely, convoluted scenario, there's just no way they'd pick a US carrier strike group sailing on the opposite side of the world, with no connection to the war in Ukraine.
@@Eliastion Yeah, it makes sense. We cant predict what Putin will do, since hes unstable. Plus, its just an example of what could happen with Nuclear bombs. If Russia launches nukes, carrier strike group may be not the first target, but it will be a target for sure.
Very insightful. Something we all need to be prepared for. I enjoy your scenarios. I hope they are just that. As a 1st grader, hearing that dreadful wailing siren filled me with so much fear. "Get under your desks! Hands over your heads!" It traumatized me in some ways. Even today if I hear that particular sound, my heart skips a beat. God bless you all.
I’m assuming Hawaii
Been there, done it. Also "loose lips sink ships".
Yes
RIGHT ON THE MONEY, SINCE THERE NO MORE NEED FOR EDCATION, IVE INVESTED IN SCHOOL DESKS IN CASE OF A THRERMAL NUCULAR I WILL SELL THE ONLY SAFE PLACE TOO HIDE.
I remember in Northern Saskatchewan Canada at the residential school how we used to do drills to hide under our desk in case a nuclear bomb fell even in grade one or two I used to think to myself this is ridiculous we will be vaporized what's the point of getting under the desk
Let's hope this stays hypothetical
Go back to seventy-four in which the British parliament sent out a pamphlet telling us what to do when the bomb dropped. One part was to hoard food beneath stairs, a months worth, another was to get a black plastic bin bag and put it over the door to shield from the rays of the blast. It made me laugh then, now even more so. As though anyone would ever be alive. To be alive is a Hollywood myth, not reality.
☝
are you fear ? 🤭😂
Putin is bluffing tho
@@yes8032 If we religiously take the media as gospel, more fool us.
This channel is more entertainment than educational. As long as you keep that in mind you can enjoy the videos.
100% true
That may be so. But videos like these send the wrong message to society. The video gives the mistaken impression that NATO forces are totally superior to Russian forces, and that in the case of conflict NATO is likely to win. But in real life there will most likely be total mutual annihilation. In general, this video shows a lot of things wrong. For example, Russia will not strike the U.S. Navy with a ballistic missile, they will do it with a much smaller and less visible hypersonic missile, which is impossible to intercept for the NATO missile defense. And I would like to point out that NATO does not have hypersonic weapons, unlike Russia. Also in case of a serious conflict Russia can instantly disable all NATO satellite tracking systems, simply by resorting to high-altitude nuclear explosions (recall that high-altitude nuclear explosions allow to disable electronics located in orbit very effectively and on a monstrous scale).
Therefore I believe that it is extremely harmful to release videos like this, which will cultivate in people a superiority complex and immerse them in illusions. On the contrary, it is necessary to think how to build a world where it will not be necessary to threaten each other with weapons.
@@xerxis301 i mean the war in Ukraine has sort of proved how bad the Russian army is.
@@lilith4961 Has it??? Or has western propaganda just done it’s job
@@lilith4961 According to who? The Western media? Don't trust anything they say or show. But even if the propaganda would be true, it doesn't need great talent or effort to fire nuks, and that would be it.
I learned from a icbm documentary that the warheads aren't self propelled. The missile gets to about 800 miles up, then the warheads are aimed and then free fall for hundreds of miles, accelerating to thousands of miles an hour, so they are almost impossible to shoot down. Horrible and beautiful technology.
My fav. Channal. Thx 4 sharing make alot more plz
Way to go mankind. You really cherished the gift you were given
You can thank Joe biden and his destructive following.
My intuition tells me the enemies aren't who we think
Yes blame the entirety of mankind when its merely a small group of politicians and that one insane inventor who created the nuke
@@censorshipleadstothenwo1237 meaning whom?
@@censorshipleadstothenwo1237 absolutely sir Everyone stop watching fake Legacy media news cnn msnbc ny times etc ..
I feel like there has to be more defense against nuclear weapons, just not publicly known. There certainly is the tech to do so.
I always assume there are three layers that no one knows about yet
Oh most definitely and most of these videos are just what if speculation
@@jypsridic I think theres a reason the Soviet Union/Russia makes such a big deal about U.S. missile shield in and around Europe, I think the US probably downplays its ability to intercept nukes.
Yes and more tech for nuclear weapon.. which public dont know.. what stops russia from classifying military stuffs
i hope so and would think so but hard to say lol. definitely plenty of reasons to keep it secret.
❤ You're so talented!
That had me at the edge of my seat lol. Better then any movie I have seen lately
This video has more hypotheticals than the overall number of videos on the channel.
Would you use less hypotheticals if you were trying make a video about a hypothetical and unprecedented scenario?
@@jeansdelajeans3937 I wouldn't even make a video like that to begin with and even if, for the sake of argument, I would, then I'd definitely not use any hypotheticals and suppositions to begin with since they are completely pointless and overall useless. One of Murphy's laws (originally "concocted" by the Greek philosopher named Diodorus) clearly states that whatever can happen, will happen. So at the end of the day, it's just a matter of time. And choosing to spend said time by creating hypothetical scenarios is yet another example of wasted time. The trick is to just go about your day and try your best to not get stuck inside vicious circles such as this one, where you constantly worry about things that even though will most likely happen, will also probably not happen during your lifetime. It's too much philosophy to get into, but you get the gist.
My heart was literally pounding faster as I imagined myself as a crew member on the ship bracing for impact!
definitely, and then what he said about having to lock sailors in certain compartments to drown 🤯 definitely something to send shivers up your spine
Soft
Ultra Soft.
Not the carrier! What about all those sailors who were just freely navigating? The narrator and writers also did a great job with pacing, setting up, & dilvering the suspense.
CERTAIN DEATH!
This video sent chills down my spine!
Those plans would go airborne. It would be much quicker to get them in air and out of danger then below deck.
I thought that too but I think it would depend on if the nearest friendly airbase was within the range of the jets. Pacific ocean is pretty big and a quick google search puts an F/A-18 Hornet's maximum range at 1300 to 1800 miles depending on speed, load and how much fuel they have. Could easily be a scenario where the carrier strike group is too far from a friendly airbase for the planes to take off.
@@Gilthwixt1 Japan is an ally
@@KupferdrahtfulThe pacific Ocean is big enough that you could be in the middle of it and be too far from Japan to fly there.
@@Gilthwixt1 als, if you can't get away form the emp or pressure wave then planes are not likely to survive very long.
@@Gilthwixt1 In the scenario in the video, they said it was "crossing south of Japan on its way towards the South China Sea for routine freedom of navigation exercises."
They should easily be within range of Guam or Okinawa, I would think.
Good video. I like the setup and how you treated the threat to the battle group. The only thing is that there is no way possible to get the aircraft below decks as there isn't enough room. I made 5 deployments onboard CV's in the Pacific and into the I.O. and in a couple of them we even left a few planes back a Cubi Point because the decks had become so crowded. The other thing is that not knowing the wind across the deck from the pressure wave I can't say you're wrong about the loss of aircraft but on a couple of those deployments we did go into typhoons. We chained the aircraft very heavily and didn't have any real damage.
downwind can never be underestimated
@@johnsmith143. An airburst nuclear blast 10,000 feet over the ocean wouldn’t create a lot of fallout. The downwind effects would be very minimal.
18 point tie downs would be called for in these circumstances. 3 chains at each tie down point on the aircraft.
If this does happen we all are gone.
What about if they just got in the aircraft and flew away before the strike. That's plausible right?
There is an inaccuracy I would like to mention.
The carrier would be firing SM3's not SM6's, the SM3's are designed specifically to intercept ballistic missiles, and is what they would fire in this situation. Just wanted to point that out for future reference.
Scary how close we're getting to the destroyed convoy scenario that started this event
I like how this is animated with simple shapes. And they went out of their way to make Boris Johnson’s hair not so 😂
The stuff of nightmares. Imagine turning on the news one day only to see that major cities across the world is being reduced to ruins by these bombs.
It's not often i get anxious about stuff happening in the world. But what's happening in Ukraine and the relations between Russia and NATO, it's no joke.
We're back to the cuban missile crisis now, if not beyond that point.
And all thanks to reckless American foreign policy over the past 30 years.
Thank the Americans for that.
I think the same waking up to Russia dropping some small nukes in Ukraine. Basically putin said that will happen if the areas he just claimed russia are attacked by nato weapons. We can't respond nuclear.
@@tombambauer5220 If Putin nukes Ukraine he is done for
As someone living in a european capital city center, I don't need to worry much about that. I will be inside the initial strike fireball and will be simply vaporized immediately.
I guess we will see how accurate this is soon !
Question: At around 9:40, you say the carrier would start lowering their aircraft down below decks to shield them from the incoming missile. Wouldn't it make more sense for an emergency scramble launch of all aircraft as well? If they could also save a few planes that way since once off the deck, the fighters could go to full afterburner and put distance between themselves and the carrier group?
I love your take on Boris Johnson 😂😂😂
Messy hair
😂😂😂
Forever looking like he just woke up that boris 😴 Johnson
I was glued to the screen every nanosecond i watched this scenario. This is powerful rendition. It was as if it was happening
I know this really isn't what I should take from this video but BORIS's HAIR HAD ME ROLLIN 🤣
If you know about this, pretty sure Russia knows about it as well. Sadly, they'd have other options in place to make sure it hits the target.
This has got to have been one of the most stressful videos I’ve seen
that is a point of video to scare you as much as can, even if he tell so much missinformation, his goal is to scare as much as he can.
there won't be a full-blown all-out nuke war, that destroys the entire planet, i can guarantee you that, but there will be catastrophise. mostly man made. some will be natural, and the last one will be divine intervention. book of revelations gives you the truth.
@La Casa De Ludi what part is misinformation?
@@lecasadeludi6607 Proof?
Many Japanese people take peace for granted for a long time in spite of tense atmosphere in the world. But this video shows that Japan could be one of major targets of nuclear strikes because of close military tie with the United States. Japanese people need to take all possible countermeasures against the worst scenario.
Japan are currently on the road to being OP, so I wish Russia and China luck.
@@nickwilliams6621 What is OP abbreviated?
@@nickwilliams6621 usa?)
@@MrEjidorie over powered
Yes, Japan should now have to improve their military...recently North Korea fire missile near japan....
What a spectacular fire work !!
This could be a great movie to watch
These military vids are getting better and better but the scary thing is we could be heading down this road so are you going to do a part 2 or 3 for this vid and what about afterwards and what about a vid on how fast our tech is evolving and are you going to do anything for the 4th of July?
The RT-2PM2 Topol-M carries a 1 megaton warhead. Seems kind of excessive to use on a carrier strike group. A low yield tactical warhead even in the single digit kilotons would achieve the same goal.
A 1Mt warhead missing a a mile would still toast the carrier too.....
Airburst nuclear detonations, even megatons in yield, are not very effective against warships past the fireball
at one km from carrier, nope, at best it will fry or disrupt electronic with emp
It doesn't.. it carries a 800KG warhead. Quite a difference.
This aged well
I love how Boris' hairdo is fairly accurate
Never underestimate your enemy. This is exactly what you have done in this scenario.
Yea and it started with Russia launching a missile that's been sitting since the 80s
@@the_monkeypox_commander6603 you think Russia haven't made any missile since 1980s.
@@pranayjha9224 ?? I'm not sure if that's a question? If so then of course not. This "scenario" had Russia using an ICBM from the 80s targeting a naval fleet that it could almost see from it's shores. Kinda silly and underestimating the enemy as the original poster commented
@@pranayjha9224 with their tiny 60 billion dollar / year military budget where 75% of the money is re-routed into corrupt politicians pockets? yeah, their forces must be "terrifying". Do you know what the American military budget is? Ya'd better look it up, joker.
Ukraine has already taught us that we vastly over-estimated russia
This scenario really relies on the missile guidance systems being inaccurate, and US "classified systems" giving perfect information.
Forget it, the author of the video doesn’t even know that Russia’s nuclear forces are now the best in the world, the United States has just begun modernization. And he also relies on the fact that the United States has some kind of secret technology, perhaps the author of the video does not know, but all important computer equipment in the Russian Federation is its own (not Intel, not AMD), the United States simply cannot hack them or somehow pull out information through backdoors in the chips of their companies.
plus the sips reacting immediately.
several mirvd missiles would be used, and the battle group is dispersed to prevent this kind of thing.
That means that missing is difficult, but sinking the group with a nuclear bomb is not feasible
If the information were perfect, we would know which warhead was real and only hit it
This whole scenario reeks of propaganda 💀
@@charles8769 I think this channel really has an imperialist bent. It can still be informative, if viewed with that cautionary asterix, but it has definitely thrown itself fully down the "capitaltism = good, communism = bad" rabbit hole.
I feel like we are in a second cold war
I felt the suspense that I have never felt on a suspense movie.
It’s fun to watch information on what they let us know
This vid was more exciting and terrifying than anything on TV for a while :0
I love how you portrayed the Japanese leader eating sushi
Like that Fire 🔥
love the video as always but really what I was most excited to learn about was what happens from the end of the video forward...
The consistency of this channel is incredible. Keep up the great work! 👍🏻
So.... Is it normal to attack Russia from local parts of countries cause we are protecting our own borders and citizens wich been attaked from Ukraine with NATO-US support.
Why Israel is safe now after so many years of attacks into civilians in Palestine and Syria?
You must check all events in eastern Ukraine since 2014
build a graph with a nuke going across the arctic.
That would be the shortest flight path from Russia to U.S.
Thanks
These videos are the best! I love the videos where you give nuclear war senarios
I guess if you are russian. Its not a feasible strategy for russia, if even do so, the nuclear retaliation will be swift.
Me too best by far
all assumptions.
not 100%
@@shaynewheeler9249 yes!
@@shaynewheeler9249 save afghanistan
Small correction: The warhead's re-entry speed is around 7000 meters/second not 1700 meters/second. Comment: You presented basically one of the top favorable scenarios where there was only one missile used to which the warhead is successfully intercepted above the sea with only a few people dying.
Exactly, Russian missiles are infamous for their heavy throw weights, and as a result the large warhead capacities they have. In real life it would have launched at least 10 or more warheads.
1700 m/s is approx 3600 mph. No way a missile is going to hit 14,000 mph unless it is in orbit. So you are full of milarky
Only far range Russian IBM can maneuver at such speeds*
But Russia have "Кинжал" a hypersonic missile that is placed on fighter jets with small nuclear warhead (the non-nuclear version of which destroyed Ukrainian air defenses at the beginning of the war)
And only after neutralized Air Defense IBM they will fly up to the target
@@hippy1002 Peaceful space rockets fly 8000m/s lol
What do you mean?
@@hippy1002 7.000 meter/second is 25.200 km/hour. An ICBM definitely hits speeds of about 18.000-25.000 km/hr just after apogee and on the way down into the atmosphere.
Beautiful!
You forget about the Russian nuclear submarines. They can take out any target in less than a minute. Very very scary and also means, game over.
Point of order, provide data that verifies this assertion
Russian subs? Are they as reliable as their tanks?
@@LibbyTarde Where do you get your information from? Women's fashion magazines?
@@TheAtheist22 No, from "Atheism Today"
@@TheAtheist22 But keep loving russian 1950's tech, comrade. 🤪
Scary , but probably the first set of nukes will be sent against any areas that can retaliate back with nukes. I don't think any country would send one just to send a message by destroying an aircraft carrier. Good vid though.
I wouldn't put it past North Korea though. The upside of the nuclear arms race has always been MAD.... I think even Pakistan and India were worried about it. But I think the idea of not launching nukes for fear of retaliation went out the window with North Korea and it certainly will if Iran ever gets one.
As we know, the US has more than one carrier strike group. At least three in the Pacific. What do you think the other battle groups would be doing, including the issue of an EAM to the boomers. Trust me it would not be pretty and Russia's Pacific bases would cease to exist. A more likely scenario would be a Russian nuclear first strike against NATO eastern countries like Poland and Russia would suddenly have a war with a front line of several thousand miles. The Kola peninsula, Kaliningrad and Sevastopol naval bases would be destroyed. To continue the Russians would have go strategic and MAD would kick in
They'd have to know and be certain of such location 1st!
Yeah this "sending a message" view of war is a bit silly.
If Russia launched a nuclear missile into the mainland US, the American people would for the first time understand the serious catastrophe of the atomic bombs that the US dropped on Japan in 1945. I really look forward to that day.
I'm American and I know Russia has made themselves and their equipment look pathetic, but I still feel this video shows the best case scenario and we don't really know what Russia is capable of.
Is this when the Aliens are supposed to show up?! Whose side will they be on?!
The main problem is that as an American, you only know and see what your media shows. And the American media are massively biased and present information in a way that benefits their government or at least their party(republicans or democrats). And the most unpleasant thing is that most Americans don't even have the opportunity to check the information themselves, because they don't know either Russian or Ukrainian language.
For example, you've probably been shown destroyed shopping malls and damaged apartment buildings, telling you that it's the Russians who have inaccurate weapons and are desperate to hit anything in their sights. In reality, this sort of thing has a lot to do with the fact that the Ukrainian military often uses civilian sites to deploy military equipment, because they know that the Russians will think twice before hitting it. And if something goes wrong, they can once again accuse Russia of war crimes and attacking civilians. Also they don't tell you about the military losses of the Ukrainian army, and they don't explain how with all the help that you provide and with the numerical and strategic advantage Ukraine cannot throw Russia out of its territory. I don't want to go into details now, because my comment will probably be automatically hidden by RUclips (freedom of speech in all its glory), but you must understand that for Russians this whole situation is a tragedy, primarily because many have close relatives in Ukraine. And at the center of this tragedy is your government. Even more so than Putin.
@@ntwalipat2 neither side
You are American? Which country in the America's continent?
"The nuclear arms race is like two sworn enemies standing waist deep in gasoline, one with three matches, the other with five."-Carl Sagan
Well I'm certainly looking forward to this! Looks like a ton of fun
Sure, until your skin starts to fall off.
@@PlayShorts3 Don't think I didn't think of that. I'm prepared my friend. I have 80 rolls of Saran wrap.
realistically for an attack on a carrier strike group russia would more likely use a submarine based short range cruise missile small nuke or go full blast and use it's 2 megaton stealth nuclear torpedo (who's existence has been confirmed by the pentagon)
Yeah, how realistic is that though. Russia barely has the resources for most things
the Russian nuclear submarines we're moved bro 😂 we lost track of them sometime last week 😂
@@Smokeythekidregulator they probably sunk 😂
@@Rek_Rc source?
@@masterstation3905 Baby boy detected.
It could very well happen Putin has already been embarrassed and there is nobody more deadly than someone who's got nothing else to lose.
actually russia lost nothing till now,,,wake up!!!
Keep taking the koolaid m8, the only time Russia would use nukes were if it was attacked with nukes first, for that show I suggest you use the USA as it's only country to consider first strike plans.
They are winning why would they go nuclear wake up
@@dimitrisiwannou1870 more than 30000 soldiers and numerous military vehicles are nothing? Not even the US lost so hard in Vietnam
Well his life. The lifes of his family. His position as president. The majority of his population. St. Petersburg, Moscow. The kremlin palace itself. That are the things he will loose. If he want's to lose all of that so yeah, continue doing what you're doing Putin.
23 hours before launch the news reaches the desk of the president of the United States..
He takes a bite of jello, poops his pants and then asks "who..um why doesn't my jello have the little thingies or Christmas gifts and swimming pools, hey boy?"
That was awesome
The fact that Infographics went out of their way to accurately depict Boris Johnson's hair is simply superb 👌
Is it just me, or are there a lot of people who seem to be acting as if nuclear war sounds like fun?
Never seen anyone acting like this. They just don't have to state the obvious thing.
Россия колония Запада, Путин не будет использовать ядерное оружие
14:36 nonsense, any carrier commander would order take-off of all F-jets way ahead of impact
"A world without a boundary" shall remain a dream .
Can't wait to see what they post tomorrow to brighten my day!
Doubt this make sense from a RUclips / monetary sense but you should think about combing topics. Yesterday and todays could have easily been combined.
A NUCLEAR MISSILE would most certainly BRIGHTEN your day and everyone else’s too!!!
let's just hope this doesn't happen 😂
edit: still doesn't change the fact that the video is heat
I don't see what's funny😐
@@strikehunterxd4669 His face
That was so gripping - not even time for a cuppa tea when these warheads start to fly
Imagine if everybody just got along
You guys have made like 10 different variations of this video.
WITH TEN MORE TO COME, WATCH HE WILL MAKE 10 MORE OF THIS SAME VIDEO JUST IN A DIFFERENT WAY.
I know right like there’s plenty other subjects of content to create
there's alot of different possibilities, and as the russo-ukraine conflict goes on more paths open up and others shut down
Also, the chain of command is different over their when it comes to nuclear weapons and response, its really up to the commanding officers conscious
Not completely. There are several different strike group configs and further differences between tactical and strategic. The commanding officers have less power to make the decisions than they did during the USSR
Hi Slav. "Their" means.... People. Like ..."it's their problem not mine" and "they're". Ex. They're really having a good time!" And "there" if you look over there, you'll find the treasure!" I volunteer to assist people in learning English. I'm not a teacher, just help out. Take care!
And that’s why the US hasn’t enacted a no fly zone and likely won’t retaliate against Russia via article 5 if it’s equipment convoys get attacked in Ukraine
Topol-m? That’s an intercontinental missile. Way too big and old and slow and not real an anti-ship weapons. If Russia wants to hit a carrier - hypersonic Kinzal rocket will be used. Far smaller, much faster, harder to intercept and with a tactical nuke warhead. Launched from air, from 2000km away.
Dude, this video is just pure propoganda
@@dosa2990 well... if you make propaganda, at least make it believable and consistent!
Love your videos where I'm LEARNING something, the consistent what-ifs scenarios are played out
Probably not smart to take this channel seriously 😂😂😂😂
Lol, you're not learning anything, you best treat it as a sitcom.
@@LibbyTarde For real for real
What a time to be alive....it's a surreal. I'm not too concerned with dying, but it's living in a post nuclear attack world is what scares me because I think that will be worse than death. There are the physical challenges that people will have to overcome, but maybe worse are the psychological challenges. Everything you've ever known will have changed in a moment with no hopes of going back to how it used to be any time soon.
We're more likely to live in a post-internet world after WW3 than post-nuclear attack.
Enstein said and I think was right. "I don't know how the world war 3 will be but the world war 4 will fight with stones"
Life is not a movie or game. You will not live in a post apocalytic world.
When comes a video about the possibilites for a peace ?
11:28 he spelled interceptors wrong haha that’s awesome. I love it. It makes the video even better
japan b like : y us everytime ?,
Not saying any of this would be funny but. Could you imagine Russia pushing the button and they all instantly blow up taking Russia out the picture with there own unmaintained nukes. It's a very big possibility
Sounds good to me!!
but whats more funny is even after russia is nuked thousands of nukes will fall on US dead hand is ingenious
@@TokitoRen5633 thousands of nukes. I don't think so. The don't have that many. So go back to school
@@michaelspencer2559 lol it's good to dream but don't go overboard on your fairy tale wishes
@@TokitoRen5633 it wasn't any of that. Just pointing out they don't maintain there equipment and the the proof is right there in front of your eyes.
That 50% intercept rate from the ages system is with no chaff or countermeasures from the missile it’s less that 40% with any even outdated countermeasures
Make an episode: 'what if a 2nd American Civilwar happens today'. Or something like that.
They have already lol
@@Califunk give me the link Please
We know what would happen. The American Taliban would be humiliated.
A carrier would have more than one aegis capable ship in it's sector, vastly increasing accuracy through network sharing. Though I understand the plot of it as a former aegis tech on those ships you are vastly underplaying their capabilities. Keep up the good content though
and you seriously undermine the strenght of the russian nuclear capabilities using ukraine operation to judge overall military strenght is a grave error, its like using vietnam and Afghanistan to judge american military
@@Benjamin-kn7hq nothing in my statement addresses or claims to address russian capabilities, only a carrier with an aegis fleet around it, so I fail to see what your point is
and russian icbm have mirv and marv, so instead one nuke falling, it likely over 4 nukes falling and able to evasive maneuver
Let's just hope that it always remains just a short video on RUclips!✌️
As long as NATO stay on their line and don't interfere the war in Ukraine
Sticky notes in the animation where a nice touch
Russia would use more than one missile for sure.
Wouldn't that be kinda weird just for one target though?
@@Disorder2312 Well, if its a low value target, yes. But to be sure, you would send the second one. They have so many, why would you save any…for a rainy day? lol.
@@prosimulate to not triger a world-wide nuclear war?
@@stixinst5791 one just will be enough
Pretty sure that IF Russia launched nukes, they wouldnt be older models to begin with. Russia would want the greatest chance of the most successful hits so they would use their new hypersonic weapons with a heck of a lot more than 4 warheads. I believe a LOT of this video also overestimates the power and technology of the west and underestimates Russian tech
My brother just got a transfer off the carrier in that strike group to be on a destroyer that’ll be in that same strike group, idk if I feel like he’ll be safer on the smaller ship. Those carriers are like nuclear resistant bunkers, nearly indestructible.
Destroyers are no joke either they can take a lot
An ICBM warhead will not hit a carrier or other vessel directly, it has no radar guidance or similar means of tracking a moving object in the final phase of the flight. It can not "see" any vessel of the strike group. It will be guided to a predetermined point via inertial guidance and gps(western)/glonass(russian). Given the flight time and the speed the vessels it is more likely to explode several miles away. It will always explode in the air above maximizing the damage done by the shockwave. If its a really lucky shot directly above the carrier (highly unlikely) you will have a burning cracked hulk of steel below it, but the possibility of such high damage quickly reduces with more distance. if the warhead explodes within a few kilometers like shown here, larger vessels will withstand the blow but be rendered out of combat due to damage on the super structures, radar etc.
but its highly unlikely that a single ICBM will do that because it simply lacks the abillity to precicely hit in the first place.
naval vessels are much more in danger from submarines and missiles fired from bombers.
Nearly not good enough, though.
Still don’t understand why a nuke would be wasted on a carrier. Hitting los angels would do much more damage.
the Japanese guy eating sushi killed me
i didn't knew that true nuclear warheads are so hard to detect even when hit
Go to 1:32 and look at how accurate they've depicted Boris Johnson's hair!! 😄😄 I love how this channel pays attention to detail and occasionally throws in a few goodies like this in their videos.
Like I said in WWIII Hour by Hour video: "Those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it."
Brilliant quote
I’d say George Santayana would agree since he was the creator of this coined phrase from 1905, OF COURSE IT IS MOST FAMOUSLY REMEMBERED WHEN Churchill used it as a part of his speech in 48’.
Thx for telling me the date and original person who said it
I know not with which what weapons WW3 is fought, but I know WW4 will be fought with sticks and stones
Etc etc
Would WWIII even have hours to go "Hour by Hour"? Wouldn't everything be over in about 15-30 minutes?