@@Zimzky91 My bad, I meant the website the website in the video. But thank you though, I have heard of it before but I never check it out, thanks for the warning
I feel like you should've asked it to do a male specifically just to see if it can cause the only thing it looks like it can do is females and Pokemon.
I think I know why the Pokemon trainers all have similar features. On Danbooru, Cynthia has 3.2k results, and Rosa has 4.9k. Pokemon in general has 144k results, with 82k results being the creatures themselves. Some more numbers: Dawn - 5.8k, Marnie - 4.8k, Lana - 2.2k, May - 5.1k Fire, just fire, has 44k results, and looking at a lot of the art, yeah, those bright orange spiraling flames are pretty popular, hence why when you typed "fire," you got a lot of those flames. "Gym Leader" as a tag, does not exist on Danbooru, however, "Gym" has 1.1k results, hence why the Gym Leaders typically had pretty sporty outfits, especially the girl at 7:35. I'm not sure how well the AI was trained with general terms, but it clearly works pretty well with specific tags, as Danbooru images are all tagged, so that's most likely what terms the AI associates with the images. It seems to be doing fine, so I'm sure there were some additional general terms so the AI wasn't ONLY trained on tags. But yeah, considering the AI is mostly being trained on cute anime girls and hentai, it did a pretty good job. It's clear to see elements from the more popular trainers like Cynthia and especially Dawn, but basically nothing from the likes of Jasmine or Clair, characters with under 500 posts on Danbooru at this current time. The tag thing makes me REALLY wonder how generating a specific type of waifu would work, especially NSFW ones. I'm also curious if it picks up on tags that are more specific than others, but there's no free trial, and I'm not paying money to just fuck around and experiment with an AI that's almost definetly stealing thousands and thousands of artworks from people who probably are none the wiser to it.
The thing with AI is they can’t create something on their own they can’t come up with an original idea and most of these things can’t handle complex descriptions trust me they’re not going to make artists lose their jobs
@@BT-su1yf Many AIs are literally trained by training another network alongside them that tries to do exactly that. The AI is considered finished when this second AI can't learn to tell the difference between the generated images and human-made ones.
aw, I was hoping for your art. Seeing random ai stuff is cool and all, but using it as a jumping off point for real art, is way cooler. (Although I acknowledge how much more work that is, and this is already a really well edited video.)
Agreed, just wanted to make this quick video to get it out there before anyone else started to use it for pokemon LOL Most videos will have me making art but there will be some simple react stuff like this here and there too :)
you can tell which trainers are popular on ████████ based on the amount of Nessa and Cynthia attributes showing up. not to mention the huge, bouncy, soft, {HAIR}
I liked the concept of the little electric boy at 4:00 :3 A tiny electric dog/rabbit that gets another typing added when it evolves? Heck yeah! Pokeball fish could be like Voltorb and Foongus, just in the water. It's a great idea! Imagine trainers swiming in the water, mistaking them for a Pokeball, tryingto pick them up and then a very angry mommy or daddy fish shows up... I like the fire owl-chicken-dog at 8:40 (mainly because I like owls). Imagining the little one has really tiny wings, but wishes to fly, so it "wears a hoodie" to hide the wings and pretend and feel more grown up and confident. Eventually it will grow own wings and fly! Or it gets so used to wearing the hoodie and not use the wings...that it doesn't. The fire slug mermaid is pretty cute, too! Why not do a fire+water type that is a starter instead of a legendary? The thing at 9:54 looked cute first, but giving it a closer look, it could be the first evo of a 3 stage bug type or something like a Surskit. Especially the two middle ones looks more like a kind of insect/caterpillar with a frog-like head. From the last collection, with the like ~12 Pokemon things...I think the two green ones at the bottom have potential to evolve. The one down in the middle looks a bit bland, but the one left of above it is kinda cute! Still not as special as the other before though. And for youself: You should draw that baby shark and give it an stunning evolution!
Ooh!- Moxie I would’ve love to see the words; Space, Rift, and attempting the (not used types of Pokémon)* fusion of concepts!- what you found was so cool!-
"They're just smashing it all together. Is that the same as people referencing other people's art? No. Because we actually sat here and made it. By definition, adding our own influence." How is it not?!! It's literally the same. And I mean *literally*. Artists are just plagiarising so many other artists and works at once that it stops counting as plagiarism. The AI then "sits" there and makes it. You can't argue against that at all, which is why it made no sense you said that part. It's not magic, it's just fast. But it did work to make this art and that shouldn't even be getting debated because it's so obvious. So finally the last part of your argument is that the AI is not putting any of it's own influence into the art. Which is yet again something that is far too stupid to bother debating. If it was not putting it's own influence on the art then it would never create different results from the same words. The words by the way are YOUR influence on the art. So if you need a physical human being's influence to be part of it, then you gave that yourself. I don't think this is needed, and yet it's included. Artists know that AI art is not a real debated topic. It's the non-artists who are getting confused by it... So why, as an artist, would you give the wrong answer to this? These AIs also use not just other artist's works, but also photographs of the real world, exactly the same as people. I'm dumbfounded you got this wrong. Don't enter the debate if you don't know the answers. You chose to make a comment on this, so it's only you that you can blame for losing my respect... And yet you're using AI art exactly how it should be used! You're portraying the reasons it's so good and beneficial to the art community!! When someone says the nonsense you say, I can link them this as evidence against your statements. It's painfully ironic. That confusion you clearly have is just passed right on to me. I want to subscribe because I love that you're using AI the right way, as concept art for pokemon. That you are such a talented artist you can refine any of these into perfection. That you can and are benefitting from this AI... But you think AI art is art theft??????? It's like if I just had a fantastic beef burger and then the chef said "meat is murder". Yes I'm coming back to your restaurant but I'm going to be deeply frustrated! The difference between AI and human art really comes down to one thing. Human art is just actually better. Even the greatest AI works are full of errors. Bad perspective, poor separation of objects, missing/extra parts. AI art just isn't that good. And this is why this is not a real debate amongst artists. Because it's non-artists that don't notice all the mistakes. It's there where ignorant people are suggesting AI replace real artists. But ask a real artist and there's no fear or worry. AI art cannot beat humans. (Yet.) Love your videos and hope you do more.
It's kind of sad that the AI generated art of these pokemon are better than the new generations coming out, I mean I do love pokemon and I still play the modern games but Nintendo and game freak seem like they don't care anymore, I mean, look at their games, they're very poorly polished
Try Pokemon Stable Diffusion. It can create a pokemon based on the actual description and not just something vaugely like it, because that's what it's specifically trained to do.
I'm thinking, if you make an AI do a specific drawing, and then use it as a reference for your own drawing, then you won't need to give credit to anyone, because it was an AI that made?
My favorite was the Black/Purple electric legendary Pokémon at 3:43. GameFreak rip that off. Please rip it off and immediately put it in Scarlet and Violet.
You know what the best/worst thing is with these humans it generates ? Well they can be considered Pokemon since Humans probably have a common ancestor with Monkey Pokemon just like we have a common ancestor with monkeys and it means they technically are a Pokemon species themselves.
First of all hilarious video 👌👌👌 But I think the important takeaway which is what you said in the vid is that the ai can only combine the information it’s been given, so it’s definitely stealing many people’s hard work to create these. It definitely is crazy to see how technology is evolving but I feel like it’s not time to be afraid of ai generated stuff yet
11 seconds in, website blurred and not named. Paysed, scrolled to see if someone guessed what I'm thinking. Found non, sooo... is it d*nb**ru? Censored it a bit to still not send some people there 🤣
3:33 pokélub. The climate Pokemon. Poison + water type. These pokémon were brought to life when too much trash was thrown in the ocean. These pokémon are extremely common around galar.
well its not even an argument anymore if u can't see how AI take hundreds of existing illustrations and makes a new illustration is similar to how every artist make their art by taking references from the real world or from other artist then u i don't really know what to tell you
Got a feeling this AI is dipping into the dark side for those trainers.
Well it uses Danbooru for sampling so.. yea
@@Zimzky91 Do you know what this website is?
@@N-Rod357 Yes. Danbooru is a japanese site for artists. Be careful though. There is some messed up stuff there.
@@Zimzky91 My bad, I meant the website the website in the video. But thank you though, I have heard of it before but I never check it out, thanks for the warning
@@N-Rod357 Oooooh, I'm sorry. No I don't know
I'd love this to take on the missing Eeveelutions.
I think there should at least be a Toxeon and Spectrion
Agreed!!
That's gonna be nuts!!!
@@potatoe972 I think they should make a separate Pokémon and do all the physical Attack types.
this was chaotic lol
These videos are amazing keep up the great work! 💙
8:26 was definitely my favorite
8:13 "lets save that for later" 💀😭
frigging love this vid, would love to see more
I promise your job will never be taken by AI
Literally the guy: EEWWWW🤨 📸 📸 📸
6:28 "Those are big-" big what?
3:00 i want this in original pokemon
6:09 cursed
So like for research what's the sight
All I know is save that
What websites is this?
Just wait. AI generated AI. :)
Did he say primogems? lol
I feel like you should've asked it to do a male specifically just to see if it can cause the only thing it looks like it can do is females and Pokemon.
1:57 2:48 4:56 6:09 6:27 6:41 6:53 6:58 7:01 7:20 7:30 7:57 8:01 8:06 10:07
I can already hear the nsfw artists getting ready
( not complaing though )
“Not complaining though” 🤨📸
@@mayodoesstuff2205 i mean.. 6:09
whats the site/app?
What’s the app called
Novel AI right? I used that to make an utterly ridiculous story
Website is, interesting…… Was still a great video!!❤❤❤
Oh fuck. AI is creating better pokémon and trainers than Gamefreak is. Am i supposed to cry right now?
(Accidentally creates anime girl)
Moxie: "is this gonna get age restricted?"
(Looks up trainers knowing it might become age restricted)
But the Pokémon anime girls are 10 tho
Moxie: "It's better at making Pokémon than humans."
Also Moxie: *saves every image of the anime girls*
69 likes and no replies? Lemme fix that
If PlurpleCliffe Finds this AI, he's gonna have lots of FUN with this one.
I think he'll probably get himself banned somewhere. Cliffe does have a habit of accidentally violating service guidelines.
cynthia, cynthia hot, cynthia hot naked, is at least what i expect from him
Do you call purplecliffe plurpecliffe because of the joke or why ? , in other words , true , really true
I think I know why the Pokemon trainers all have similar features.
On Danbooru, Cynthia has 3.2k results, and Rosa has 4.9k. Pokemon in general has 144k results, with 82k results being the creatures themselves.
Some more numbers: Dawn - 5.8k, Marnie - 4.8k, Lana - 2.2k, May - 5.1k
Fire, just fire, has 44k results, and looking at a lot of the art, yeah, those bright orange spiraling flames are pretty popular, hence why when you typed "fire," you got a lot of those flames.
"Gym Leader" as a tag, does not exist on Danbooru, however, "Gym" has 1.1k results, hence why the Gym Leaders typically had pretty sporty outfits, especially the girl at 7:35.
I'm not sure how well the AI was trained with general terms, but it clearly works pretty well with specific tags, as Danbooru images are all tagged, so that's most likely what terms the AI associates with the images. It seems to be doing fine, so I'm sure there were some additional general terms so the AI wasn't ONLY trained on tags.
But yeah, considering the AI is mostly being trained on cute anime girls and hentai, it did a pretty good job. It's clear to see elements from the more popular trainers like Cynthia and especially Dawn, but basically nothing from the likes of Jasmine or Clair, characters with under 500 posts on Danbooru at this current time.
The tag thing makes me REALLY wonder how generating a specific type of waifu would work, especially NSFW ones. I'm also curious if it picks up on tags that are more specific than others, but there's no free trial, and I'm not paying money to just fuck around and experiment with an AI that's almost definetly stealing thousands and thousands of artworks from people who probably are none the wiser to it.
Jesus Christ.
Pretty well Documented.
Screw Danbarou. When I first saw that website, I WANTED TO BLEACH MY EYES OUT WITH HOLY WATER! There's NOTHING cute about Hentai.
You should draw some of these. They would look great in your style!
Why not make your own renditions of these AI designs, but only the trainers to make your own elite four and gym leaders.
Website?
@@DhrobasScorbunny NovelAI
It would all be r34 tho.
Out of all of them, my favorite is hands down that pokeball fish! 😍 3:37
Same
Sooo cute!
more (cursed?)ai art! time to grab some popcorn and watch it 🍿
Truee
The thing with AI is they can’t create something on their own they can’t come up with an original idea and most of these things can’t handle complex descriptions trust me they’re not going to make artists lose their jobs
AI can't do that yet, but who knows what the future will bring? What they can do already with available source material is still really impressive.
People reacted this way when cameras were invented, it truly doesn't matter that much
We’re going to need a program that can tell whether something was AI generated
@@BT-su1yf Many AIs are literally trained by training another network alongside them that tries to do exactly that.
The AI is considered finished when this second AI can't learn to tell the difference between the generated images and human-made ones.
U know that A.I works the same as human brain, just downgraded, right?
aw, I was hoping for your art. Seeing random ai stuff is cool and all, but using it as a jumping off point for real art, is way cooler.
(Although I acknowledge how much more work that is, and this is already a really well edited video.)
Agreed, just wanted to make this quick video to get it out there before anyone else started to use it for pokemon LOL
Most videos will have me making art but there will be some simple react stuff like this here and there too :)
@@moxiedraws what is the name of the AI?
Not only can Ai create Pokemon but it can create Waifus too??? Ai art is insane xD
Lol yes
Wat and wat
Remember to count the fingers.
It's the other way around
Me who is trying to become an artist. This scares me ;-;
you can tell which trainers are popular on ████████ based on the amount of Nessa and Cynthia attributes showing up.
not to mention the huge, bouncy, soft, {HAIR}
Guys is it me or is this generator a bit sexist
I liked the concept of the little electric boy at 4:00 :3 A tiny electric dog/rabbit that gets another typing added when it evolves?
Heck yeah!
Pokeball fish could be like Voltorb and Foongus, just in the water. It's a great idea!
Imagine trainers swiming in the water, mistaking them for a Pokeball, tryingto pick them up and then a very angry mommy or daddy fish shows up...
I like the fire owl-chicken-dog at 8:40 (mainly because I like owls). Imagining the little one has really tiny wings, but wishes to fly, so it "wears a hoodie" to hide the wings and pretend and feel more grown up and confident. Eventually it will grow own wings and fly! Or it gets so used to wearing the hoodie and not use the wings...that it doesn't.
The fire slug mermaid is pretty cute, too! Why not do a fire+water type that is a starter instead of a legendary?
The thing at 9:54 looked cute first, but giving it a closer look, it could be the first evo of a 3 stage bug type or something like a Surskit. Especially the two middle ones looks more like a kind of insect/caterpillar with a frog-like head.
From the last collection, with the like ~12 Pokemon things...I think the two green ones at the bottom have potential to evolve. The one down in the middle looks a bit bland, but the one left of above it is kinda cute! Still not as special as the other before though.
And for youself:
You should draw that baby shark and give it an stunning evolution!
Someone’s saving a ton of the trainer art… 😉😏
Moxie: *blurs the website and doesn't say the name*
You fool, that will not stop me. I have been training my whole life for this!
What is it my dude
If you can find it say the name to me I need this ... For a school project
@@llmazchild it's litteraly in the description
@@CrockedAardvark I looked up "Art maker AI bot" and I believe I found it, if not it's an extremely similar website
Novel Ai, gotta pay a small fee to use it
Petition for Moxie to give us copies of those pokewaifus
Pikachu sailor moon is the mega evolution we didn't know we need
That spam bot that impersonates RUclipsrs replied on my comment pretending to be you Moxie.
Thanks i think ive purged them again, they just keep coming back
it's always the girls never the boys (the gijinkas are mostly female) i would have like to see male trainers too T ^ T
2:35 this is exactly everything a digimon is
Does anybody realize he said primogems instead of mobile money and it shows a slight science of genshin impact??????!!!!
Ooh!- Moxie I would’ve love to see the words; Space, Rift, and attempting the (not used types of Pokémon)* fusion of concepts!- what you found was so cool!-
8:54 this is what Pawmi should evolve into
No, no, don't try to think that your just intrested about the art, we see you saiving and looking at these.
"They're just smashing it all together. Is that the same as people referencing other people's art? No. Because we actually sat here and made it. By definition, adding our own influence."
How is it not?!! It's literally the same. And I mean *literally*. Artists are just plagiarising so many other artists and works at once that it stops counting as plagiarism. The AI then "sits" there and makes it. You can't argue against that at all, which is why it made no sense you said that part. It's not magic, it's just fast. But it did work to make this art and that shouldn't even be getting debated because it's so obvious. So finally the last part of your argument is that the AI is not putting any of it's own influence into the art. Which is yet again something that is far too stupid to bother debating. If it was not putting it's own influence on the art then it would never create different results from the same words. The words by the way are YOUR influence on the art. So if you need a physical human being's influence to be part of it, then you gave that yourself. I don't think this is needed, and yet it's included. Artists know that AI art is not a real debated topic. It's the non-artists who are getting confused by it... So why, as an artist, would you give the wrong answer to this?
These AIs also use not just other artist's works, but also photographs of the real world, exactly the same as people. I'm dumbfounded you got this wrong. Don't enter the debate if you don't know the answers. You chose to make a comment on this, so it's only you that you can blame for losing my respect... And yet you're using AI art exactly how it should be used! You're portraying the reasons it's so good and beneficial to the art community!! When someone says the nonsense you say, I can link them this as evidence against your statements. It's painfully ironic.
That confusion you clearly have is just passed right on to me. I want to subscribe because I love that you're using AI the right way, as concept art for pokemon. That you are such a talented artist you can refine any of these into perfection. That you can and are benefitting from this AI... But you think AI art is art theft??????? It's like if I just had a fantastic beef burger and then the chef said "meat is murder". Yes I'm coming back to your restaurant but I'm going to be deeply frustrated!
The difference between AI and human art really comes down to one thing. Human art is just actually better. Even the greatest AI works are full of errors. Bad perspective, poor separation of objects, missing/extra parts. AI art just isn't that good. And this is why this is not a real debate amongst artists. Because it's non-artists that don't notice all the mistakes. It's there where ignorant people are suggesting AI replace real artists. But ask a real artist and there's no fear or worry. AI art cannot beat humans. (Yet.)
Love your videos and hope you do more.
Just occurred to me. What would happen if you specified "male trainer" surely the ai hasn't gotten much training in that subject.
It's kind of sad that the AI generated art of these pokemon are better than the new generations coming out, I mean I do love pokemon and I still play the modern games but Nintendo and game freak seem like they don't care anymore, I mean, look at their games, they're very poorly polished
It's as if Jazza and Jack Sepiceye had a love child
This man needs to get a couple of friends together and make a Pokémon Fangame Plot
Whatcha saving those trainer pictures for moxie 🤨 Little suuuusss
"Never mind I'm not telling you don't look it up."
Oh come on. How BAD could it POSSIBLY be?
What is the website
I see Moxie in my notifications and I click
Didn’t create even ONE male Pokémon trainer :P
You now must draw these in your style.
Day 1: make my profile pic into a pokemon
8:14 isn't that just from Little Busters? Did it spit out a 1:1 anime scene with a similar character?
When my favourite youtuber uploads it's a good day
The crazy to me Moxie, is that the fire starter one keeps the chinese zodiac theme! it could be a Fire/rock Ox Pokemon!
I would LOVE to see a series where you use the AI images as inspiration for your own Fakemon and gym leaders. Please please!
2:03
She looks like she has an Outfit based on Vikavolt.
See her as an moe-fied Vikavolt or a trainer, who really likes their Vikavolt.
wich generator did you use? bc i want the pic from 1:50 2:50 4:56 and 6:54
Novelai
Try Pokemon Stable Diffusion. It can create a pokemon based on the actual description and not just something vaugely like it, because that's what it's specifically trained to do.
what is the website called?
7:29 Imagine Torterra with bow tie stand besider her and she says "Hes my dad"....
You don't need to thank me for some brain damage
This AI art series is really fun the best part is seeing you turn the amalgamation you see into an actual badass Pokemon very cool 👍
What are you saving those pics for Moxie?! HMMMMMMMMM??!?!???!
I'm thinking, if you make an AI do a specific drawing, and then use it as a reference for your own drawing, then you won't need to give credit to anyone, because it was an AI that made?
What website is this
Moxie getting turned on by the those female Pokemon trainers drawings
What's it called (research purposes)
My favorite was the Black/Purple electric legendary Pokémon at 3:43.
GameFreak rip that off. Please rip it off and immediately put it in Scarlet and Violet.
I completely lost it at the sailor pichu 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I'm probably not first.
You know what the best/worst thing is with these humans it generates ?
Well they can be considered Pokemon since Humans probably have a common ancestor with Monkey Pokemon just like we have a common ancestor with monkeys and it means they technically are a Pokemon species themselves.
Loving this art channel of yours! When you began drawing, did you use any books to learn how or was it all trial and error?
WHAT WEBSITE IS THISSSSSSSS
Ai really do be stealing our jobs T-T
Back home, feeling good, Moxie uploads the Best video on RUclips!
They are not mashing together art stop spreading misinformation. NovelAI clearly stated in their blog everything made is 100% original.
primogems r the new currency
This was an interesting one who got the ai to do these types of things
Hey Moxie are u gonna draw these AI arts ? 🤔
First of all hilarious video 👌👌👌
But I think the important takeaway which is what you said in the vid is that the ai can only combine the information it’s been given, so it’s definitely stealing many people’s hard work to create these. It definitely is crazy to see how technology is evolving but I feel like it’s not time to be afraid of ai generated stuff yet
Hey Moxie! John aka PM7 just made a bunch of AI Pokémon too. Did you see that? I humbly request you make them better! 😅
11 seconds in, website blurred and not named. Paysed, scrolled to see if someone guessed what I'm thinking. Found non, sooo... is it d*nb**ru? Censored it a bit to still not send some people there 🤣
This went from "AI Art Bot Makes New Pokémon Designs" to "AI Art Bot Makes Cute Anime Girls"
What is that website called?
In 3:44 it looks like a graifai evolution
3:33 pokélub. The climate Pokemon. Poison + water type. These pokémon were brought to life when too much trash was thrown in the ocean. These pokémon are extremely common around galar.
I love the quiet saving of every trainer picture. Just the quick cut off when he clicks the save button is killing me
just for research ai name
Programming is going to be the last job humanity will have... Better learn some C# or JavaScript.
So excited for this
please dont support ai art
well its not even an argument anymore if u can't see how AI take hundreds of existing illustrations and makes a new illustration is similar to how every artist make their art by taking references from the real world or from other artist then u i don't really know what to tell you