Simple yes, but slow, energy-inefficient, hard to upgrade, unminable for most regular people, and with zero privacy. All of those properties have already been improved by orders of magnitudes by other projects. Once BTC stops being no 1 in Market Cap who's gonna want to own it?
Do you use the Exodus wallet? Add "Nano" to the main portfolio, then go into the Nano wallet, copy and paste the Nano public address here, and I'll send you some Nano. Then you decide which is better for real world transactions and store of value. This isn't financial advice. Do your Due Diligence.
If he wants to be a power hungry nerd who gets hard only when bending networks to his will, he should work at the Alphabet companies. That's where his gang is.
then it becomes a legacy.. tech that does not evolve is not relevant. Horse and cart, ICE engine, Mainframe computers, tapes, CD's, records, list goes on, and BTC will be on that list if it cannot evolve and move with the market.
Yes very decentralized with most of the miners being in China! haha (or used to be) .. however to mine you have to have alot of money, which puts it in the hands of the few. That to me is not decentralized.
The essence is that the bitcoin community wants to ensure that any individual on earth with a decent internet connection can run a full node; this is only possible by keeping the block size small and therefore if scaling happens on layer 2, not on the main chain. Today, as an individual it is almost impossible to run your own ethereum node, which is bad for decentralization.
This is a joke, you'd need tens of thousands of dollars in Asics to have any legitimate non-zero probability of your node ever minting a block. Sure, this was the intent, but there was never intended to be this much processing power on the network. The exact opposite has happened: the network is centralized in asic farms in one region in China. People just need to recognize that this didn't work. Many, many superior solutions have been developed. There's even an entire academic field devoted to studying blockchain consensus mechanisms. We have solutions in spades, and many have already been implemented. There's no reason to still care about Bitcoin, except that it's so full of hype that you can make a buck speculating...if you get out in time. It already crashed when people learned about the (very real) electricity issue. Who knows if it will come back? If it does, it will only be to die later when more people learn how old-fashioned it is. Name recognition isn't everything.
@@geometerfpv2804 You're mistaken. We're talking about full nodes, NOT mining nodes. Full nodes are nodes that keep their own record of the bitcoin blockchain and who enforce the consensus rules. You can run a full node for $200; all you need is a raspberry pi and a 1TB memory card, that's it. This is not possible with ethereum.
To add to your point, to run a full Bitcoin node takes about 400 GB of space right now while Ethereum (Archive node) is 7.5TB. This has caused complete Ethereum nodes to most of the time be run on cloud servers that are subject to cease and desist orders by sovereign nations, or corporations that own them disallowing their continued use. This is very bad for decentralization because now the only ones that can verify account balances on Ethereum are large entities as opposed to any average person with a $200 setup or even existing computer in most cases.
@@vgeorge101 Not mining, a full node. Nodes verify the blockchain and enforce consensus rules on the network. It’s equally as important as mining but for different reasons
this is the reason any bitcoin video cant have decent comment discussion, its just shitheads already invested trying to keep the hype up. yes we get it, but maybe we can talk about some of the actual things he said instead of using every bitcoin video comment section as an advertisement for bitcoin
@@catiex8826 There is no arguing against things these days. All you can really do is build/support something better and encourage people in that direction. Instead of constantly telling someone not to do stupid thing after stupid thing get them doing something good that can keep their focus and stop them from doing all the dumb stuff.
@@catiex8826 totally agree, everyone tries defend their investments, but BTC maxies arguments are falling short for why BTC is and will always be the KING, and all they do these days is repeat and repeat the same rhetoric they hear from Pomp and other youtubers preaching to the choir. The BTC community has slowly shifted from a beautiful thing a few years ago to a toxic environment full of Pomps and Keisers going on tours to promote BTC with titles like "F*ck Elon", and calling any blockchain innovation a shitcoin while reluctantly oppose to any change to improve the thing they love for the better.
Has it? But really, has it? It's only 1% of global transactions, and it's been around now for 10 years. It hasn't really reinvented anything except its own Bro culture.
Paying for a coffee or a new phone ia overrated. Btc is a store of value, it’s reinvented gold. It’s because of golds inconvenience to be used as a currency why we switched to fiat standard. Btc is the moat scarse property known to man kind. Cardano is a centralised scam. Time will tell.
Is Charles going crazy?...Glass half full perspective: Bitcoin is base monetary layer with Cardano and Ethereum application layer built on top. Charles sees the evolution without the organism niches. The religious aspect is a feature fueling the game theory not a bug. Bitcoin is the best store value across time and space. 'It's too slow' is loser think with Bitcoin Network maturing in front of our eyes, how about Lightning & Sovryn? Come for the speculation, stay for the monetary policy.
6:33. Yes, repeatedly. There are many examples of successful nations built off of the gold standard. There are no examples of successful nations built off of fiat. Nations start on hard money, then they move to soft money, then they die. Bitcoin is designed to be the hardest money, and to not have the attack vectors which allow the transition from hard to soft in the first place.
@@TheMonkeygrunt The United States of America for starters. America only STARTED to depart from the gold standard in the early 20th century, and only just fully left it in 1971. In fact, most of all of Europe was on a gold standard leading up to WWI. Going further back. Rome was on a gold standard. Florence was on a gold standard. Both failed after they started to debase it. History keeps repeating this theme over and over and over again. You may benefit from reading "The Bitcoin Standard" by Saifedean Ammous.
@ILoveTacoTuesday I guess you didn't read my comments. We started on the gold standard, we have since been slowly transitioned to a fiat standard, and now everything is becoming unstable. (Also Florence maintained their gold standard for over 500 years, so hard money works as long as you stay on it.)
@ILoveTacoTuesday Anything 'could' happen, however, things are looking very promising for Bitcoin. The item I find more concerning isn't so much the "if" we transition to Bitcoin (hard to really see it going any other way), but more under what terms. Usually monetary transitions are VERY painful. Now, on the plus side, things are shaping up in such a way that a smoother transition is looking possible. That's what I'm hoping for.
@ILoveTacoTuesday The reason that the market always centers on the hardest money has nothing to do with whether people have any power or not. It's just like how free markets always outcompete planned markets. Like I recommended before in this thread, I believe you'd benefit greatly from a deep dive into Austrian economics, and The Bitcoin Standard would be a good jumping off spot. Unless you really want to jump into the deep end with Mises and Human Action.
it wont die. it will coexist. like what paul tudor jones say: bitcoin is precious crypto. the rest will be transactional crypto. i totally agree this will be the future.
Precious Crypto? What..lol Brb, buying my GF some Bitcoin jewlery. If you want to know the truth, the price of Crypto has a lot to do with it trading on an unregulated market.
"Can't do anything interesting or unique there." Well, we've had nearly a god damn century of Wall Street, hedge funds, corporations, governments, and the FED doing "interesting" and "unique" things with and to the money supply. Maybe having a simple, hard, sound, scarce, and predictable money supply is the most interesting and unique thing we have left.
Spot on! All these fancy derivatives and complicated constructions just obfuscate the fact that the base layer is shitty and that these greedy companies just run unproven experiments, remember the heydays of mortgage backed securities and credit default swaps?
@Tom Gadbois POS is very centralised system..those who hv more ADA will get more ADA from staking.. that equals to more power in governance..guess who has the most ADA? Hint: the founders
I believe Robert Breedlove would say something here along the lines of ,"What you are failing to realize, is that the first to marketability on a protocol network will reign supreme in a world of protocol." Amongst other amazing advancements and things like Jack Mallers and his work in Lightning and how true Defi can only be built on the Bitcoin blockchain, it is also a shame to hear Charles speak hastily with such emotion against inevitability. As Yassine from ARK would say, "don't bite the hand that feeds you." Bitcoin is freedom.
Dollar was redeemable with gold to the point they had to many Dollars vs gold. Solution: Fiat. So in a sense it failed. In both scenarios printing too much currency is not good
@@gokkmokk1 So it must naturally be asked, doesn't this mean a similar fate for Bitcoin? My guess is Legacy Finance is going to have their own centralized coin(s).
5:32. This is profoundly disingenuous. Plenty of people can tell you what Bitcoin is for. It's to provide a "truly" decentralized monetary foundation which is beyond the reach of corruptive entities, and every engineering trade off was made to that end. It wasn't trying to be all things to all people, it was trying to solve the fundamental attack vectors of gold, which always resulted in gold being disintermediated as the monetary foundation of society. Bitcoin is designed to be everything gold always wanted to be and strong enough to hold on if it ever makes it to that status. Cardano and Ethereum on the other hand are the entities which are suffering from an identity crisis, as they try to be all things to all people.
This is profound. That's what i was caught thinking, "why does he expect btc to do so much?" It's doing what it needs to do. It's like expecting the internet to BE youtube, google, apple and amazon all at once. Do you have a twitter?
More like don't change my money, but, if something unforeseen happens and my money does need to change, it shouldn't be nearly impossible to change it. He has a point, and that's proven by the Taproot upgrade.
Point being? People also measure house valuation in terms of government-backed fiat currencies. You're free to use another denominator (though doing so might put you out of sync with the crypto trading market).
@@pmc9194 'point being' that crypto is often heralded as a superior form of currency which will replace government fiat... and yet if you couldn't exchange crypto for government fiat, nobody would want it.
WRONG!! Cardano is the MOST decentralised blockchain and by its nature has NO centralised point of control or “CEO” Charles Hoskinson is the CEO of IOHK!!
If you know very little about Bitcoin - this guy sounds like he is making a ton of sense. If you know a lot about Bitcoin - you’re sitting here thinking something quite different. It’s difficult to describe how little sense he makes.
@@reignvry6725 and yet he is deliberately downplaying the store of value aspect of bitcoin, the immutability aspect of bitcoin, the fact that it has no centralized authority to change it. You should watch some videos on why Bitcoin is different than Ethereum and other cryptocurrencies so you can see him for what he is. It doesnt matter what he participated in, if he is projecting a message that is ultimately deceiving for his own personal gain.
@@typicalhog That people doesnt understand Bitcoin. Which fair enough, but he's framing it in a way that is to get people off of Bitcoin and on to his platform.
Bitcoin is practically finished product on the main chain. It serves its purpose as store of value perfectly. Almost all other coins are not finished products. Cardano is practically still a ghost chain! Even ETH is unfinished product. The current price of Cardano is just a market expectation about its future!
I mean if you listen to Hoskinson's argument, his whole point (and I'd agree) is that Bitcoin is *not* (or at least should not be) a finished product. If it does not improve, it will eventually, inevitably, be left in the dust, because many superior ideas have been developed since Bitcoin came out. It may take a long time for other coins to "catch up," but they eventually will. Yes, Bitcoin does work. It works great, and personally I believe it is here to stay for the foreseeable future. But it cannot do what many other coins can do. And unless people stop viewing it as "finished," it never will. Again, that doesn't mean Bitcoin will die; it *does* mean that there is room for other coins that do more than Bitcoin can. EDIT: I should also address the comment about price--price is an irrelevant factor when it comes to the success of the technology. If the goal is to move away from fiat, then the goal is only reached once the fiat price of the coin is unimportant. As long as the fiat price of the coin is an important factor, that means the mission has not yet succeeded. Obviously it has made a bunch of people really wealthy, and that's great for them--I have no issue with that. But it's not relevant to the ultimate success or failure of any of these technologies.
@@JamesBlacklock Exactly, and if anyone says Ethereum is not currently performing is deluded. Unfortunately for Bitcoin a Cult like following has/is developing around it which is very, very bad for not just BTC but the space in general. I really hope they don't indirectly set BTC up to fail and drag the entire Blockchain industry down with it.
@@JamesBlacklock That is nice and found response but I said that BTC is finished on the main chain. Lets see what developer can give to us on layer 2 or side chains. We already have the lightning network and lets see what developers can do about BTC smart contracts (Stacks). There is plent of room to grow on BTC layer 2 areas.
I respect Charles but I think he underestimates the importance of the Bitcoin protocol being outside the reach of "the powers that be". Then, he talks highly of ETH which would be extremely easy to cease control of or shut down. This is what "shit coin" refers to. These projects are new technology but all built within reach of the same corrupt individuals who control the current system.
Bitcoins aim to be the hardest Asset in the universe, so ofc you can't just change it. If Bitcoin is not hard to change it wouldn't live up to it's goal. When a decentraliserad system that promise on a monetary policy that should not change succeed - you get a system that will not change. What's so hard to understand about that? What Bitcoin has to do is to move the Assets transactions to a different layer. The Asset should be hard, the network should be open for innovationen. Guess what? This is happening.
@Travel City How it's taxed depends on the rules in your country, has nothing with Bitcoin to do and nowdays it's not traceable. You can teleport your coins around in the Lightning Network, try trace that...
@Travel City that's not true. Bitcoin allow your UTXO to escape in different layers where they cannot be tracked. On the blockchain this look like your UTXO is not moving, but in reality you can move your funds in the speed of light!
@Travel City You can use Bitcoin in many different ways. If you buy with KYC on an exchange and use it normally you will leave a trace back to your identity. If you coin join and/or use Lightning your trail will fade away..
“ What the hell is the point of bitcoin?” ... it’s called decentralization, security, and freedom. This is really tempting me to sell my cardano since he clearly doesn’t understand the time tested strength of btc and the lightning network.
I know he understands it . He’s just pushing cardano at the expense of btc . He understands security is important and has admitted that btc is secure. You can’t have max security scalability and decentralization , only 2 of 3. Or all three are diminished
Idk when he recorded this podcast but charles saying “bitcoin hasnt gotten any more adoption”. Buddy a whole ass country just adopted it and many too follow
The adoption by El Salvador is not exactly genius...it's more of a publicity stunt than anything, they are trying to get people to use them as an off-shore crypto haven to bring money into the country. A huge number of people in El Salvador don't even have basic bank accounts.
Im not an expert and no native speaker. But did they mention one of the biggest Pro´s for Bitcoin - the decentralization? That´s a rly important USP for BTC. A system of rules instead of system leaded by rulers. That´s one of the main differences to our current Money-System, which makes it beside the mathematical limitation (scarcity) so valueable.
@@cryptocrunch413 you probably don't understand what it means to be the reserve currency yet... Historically, reserve currencies have been backed by immense political power. Your gold is worthless if the state can seize it at the ports. Btc provides a completely different way to think of what backs a reserve currency... And that is: *immutability* at the protocol level. This is the only feature that no shitcoin or cbdc will implement... Immutability is the alternative to strong political power. How? Imagine for a second that the US is replaced as the global leader. The USD crumbles under its debt weight. Being a global reserve currency as a political and military force is great... However, the position of the global world leader isnt permanent. Hence storing wealth beyond a millennia becomes impossible. Unless of course you had a protocol that is independent of any state, Central Bank , and is also immutable for a 100 years. If it wasn't, then BTC protocol will change under immense political pressure. It is vitally important that the leader of the decentralised digital Economy stays immutable. Then we can have layer2's, altcoins, shitcoins, third-party services and exchanges... experiment with varying levels of security and immutability. As they continue to introduce BTC to the world. Money is simply a database of transactions. Your USD, dollars etc is worth nothing in an island with no economic activity.
@@kennethmayor3596 It remains to be seen if the BTC protocol has not actually fked itself already. How will it reward miners to secure the network when there is not much left to mine, and LN pays them nothing. I think this is important to think about, and how POS networks are superior in their design, by rewarding stakers to secure the network. The fact that BTC is extremely hard to change does not bode well into the future.
Don’t get discouraged by Charles lack of understanding.. he knows the truth but he needs to sell a product where bitcoin doesn’t need to. aDA still has value despite this.
@@knockoutfever4 id be willing to bet Charles understand crypto more than 99% of the people in the comment section. He created a top ten crypto that's being used by nation states. What have you tards done other than pretend to be smarter than him?
Why? Because he was right? Because he said what could make Bitcoin better, instead of making vague negative statements, like everyone here in the comment section. If you really did sell, then it is truly your loss.
Bitcoin only needs to exist, and it needs to work. ALWAYS. It forms the concrete foundation upon which every other cryptocurrency derives it's legitimacy. Leave it be, and leave the innovation to every other project
Just like the internet... Innovations and USP's becomes irrelevant if the underlying protocol ceases to exist. Comparing BTC to a programming language or a football star Is the dumbest thing I have heard from a billionaire.
Super cool that you interview a guy like CH on here! I love to see it! I think the thing he misses about Bitcoin is its immutability. He spends most of this segment talking about all the extra amazing things other chains can do and how they’re all built upon the bedrock of developmental growth. And then says “I can’t for the life of me understand the point of Bitcoin.” The point is that Bitcoin doesn’t change. And when something doesn’t change we give it our trust. And when we can trust something it is natural to invest in it.
News flash everyone. They are different things with different use cases! Feel free to come down from your high horses. Careful you don't turn into the tyrant you are trying to escape from. You're allowed to have and like both. Gotta love that democracy stuff 😉
I don't disagree with you. However, gold had one enormous flaw - governments were able to interfere and regulate it, make laws that undermined its natural market value, hobble ownership, confiscate it in wartime, forbid its transfer, write promissory notes that were not honoured, and finally replaced it with an arbitrary inflationary fiat. They will probably do the same with Bitcoin - ban the sale of it, forbid exchanges to sell it, close BTC ATMS, increase taxes on transactions, increase capital gains... etc. Power is ruthless and doesn't give it up easily.
@@Jane_under_a_tree_with_a_book Governments can *not* interfere with it, thats the problem. Gold worked for thousands of years but modern governments are to expensive to run on gold, so they invented currency. If they need to spend more then they have, they print more of it and spend it. Because now there is more of it around its value decreases aka inflation. The cost of the inflation is payed by the population, as their "money" is now worth less. They can't simply print more gold tho. In wartime or during economic crisis, other countries shit on your worthless currency so you need gold to buy stuff. For that reason Roosevelt for example outlawed possession of gold coin and bullion in 1933, people had to sell it to the government for currency.
@@hernerweisenberg7052 It is silly to say governments cannot interfere with BTC when they already have/are, on many levels, in various countries and jurisdictions. Although they cannot touch the actual protocol, they can dampen people's ability to trade with it. Cryptocurrencies are easily delisted from exchanges making it difficult to trade - the USA treatment of XRP comes to mind. Payment of BTC for goods or services is illegal in Russia. Politicians can spread significant FUD - for example Warren (USA). In 1933, it was a criminal offense for US citizens to own or trade gold anywhere in the world (with exceptions for some jewelry) - they could do the same to BTC using, for example, terrorism laws. I am pro-BTC and buy as much as I can - but I am not blind to the ways that governments and the banking systems can dampen mass adoption when the owners of the financial systems are threatened.
With all respect to Cardano people, why does Bitcoin actually need to do any of that crap? So that random people who don't even want to design anything of their own can make low-effort Ponzi Tokens like Shib and Hokk and whatever else there is? Security and resistance against government regulation are the most important. Staking is great to benefit and get funding from rich VC's but with so many coins held on centralized exchanges (subject to political pressure, corruption and coercion) and the disproportionate allocation of governance to rich interests, they really they really can't compare to a well-adopted, fairly-mined POW system. Charles should ask actual ETH miners what they think of EIP-1559 and POS if he thinks they love upgrading so much lol.
That's not a proper comparison. It is more complex than that. There are trade-offs with these "new" systems. They are not all benefits with no drawbacks.
This comment section overwhelmingly understands the difference between layered protocols and end products. Protocols aren't supposed to change, products are.
The biggest and most obvious weakness of ADA is sitting in front of you trying to tell you how great it is. He is the influential frontman, the leverage point, the center of attacks. This applies to EVERY other coin, token or crypto company except bitcoin.
What did he described gives Bitcoin it's security and decentralization things that ADA does not have in fact after watching this video I swapped my ada for more BTC
Charles is making a huge mistake by not making a really important distinction - Cardano and BTC are not alike, they are both categorically different. We will have and should have a space with multiple block chains that are working together not trying to win 1st place, that in itself is a type of centralization where one option exists and everything else is fundamentally subpar in all categories.
One can exist if it's not a security. Bitcoin isn't everything else worth mentioning is. If someone controls the money without sacrificing anything why even switch from fiat.
@@collinblatchford you are saying that "one money is only legit if the US government approve its usage" funny. i don`t need US permission. also competition is always good for the users. this idea that maxis have that only should exist btc is totalitarian shit. let the markets decide which will be more valuable
Do these ppl not understand Ada had a late start?! Lol Charles also doesn’t want to put out a half ass product. I’m good with that. You ppl are the NOW NOW NOW generation. With his market cap holding him at #4 Coin. Where’s the hurry?! Lol you guys are ridiculous. He’s coming out with updates all summer. Get off his nuts.
and this is you missing the point. The problem they have with Charles here is that he's being dishonest when it comes to talking about Bitcoin. Discounting facts and in some cases lying directly to Lex and the audience when he doesn't have to. The method of talking he's using here is a big tell.
I realize i could turn trading from a passive income to my huge main source of income and was able to do so after i met with Mrs Tory she is a professional 💯🥰
Money is not just technology. It is a belief system. If it’s only value is the state of the art technology behind it, your money will be replaced/disrupted every 4 years by more advanced technology. Hodl BTC. It’s almost a religion at this point.
And yet Cardano is about to become a smart contract POS coin a year or more ahead of Ethereum. Innovation takes time when done right. Same for electric cars. Same for crypto.
"with not much to show for it". Haven't read any of the papers that they have been putting out for years now, have you? Cardano is miles ahead of most other projects. They are solving hard problems that the Bitcoin "community" is barely even thinking about. It's much faster, cheaper and efficient than most others (Nano, IOTA are more efficient once they are truly decentralized) out there. Wait a year. There will be tons of applications on cardano. There are already a lot of exciting projects going on.
Use the Lightning network if it's too slow? The fact it's been around for over a decade is what gives BTC such credibility. Etherium doesn't even have built in parity checks for wallet addresses. So easy to send Ether to the void; gone forever.
Thanks Lex for pressing the issue of bitcoin and digital gold. This is the first time that Hoskinson has seemed very transparent to me. Really appreciate your work and your integrity.
@@jerensteffen Indeed. It's not like the general public got to vote on it and got rid of the gold standard by consensus. It's all decisions made by unelected private companies, a.k.a central banks.
Several intelligent people are terrible investors because they face the market With untrained physiology and untamed emotions. You need to Keep raw irrational emotions under control.
This is correct. Look at it this way How many wealthy people or millionaires become wealthy by wages or salaries for saving in their bank accounts? I'm sure you do not have a correct answer to that.
@@davidlewis2122 Funny enough they do not know how the fiat money losses its value as the days go by. Our global economic value keeps declining Dollar will soon not be the safe haven we all thought it was.
Anyone here actually tried creating a contract on the marlowe playground? If your serious about cardano and not experienced with coding I suggest trying to create a smart contract with blockly in the marlowe playground. If your watching this interview you have extra time on your hands!
His argument is basically "bitcoin is old and slow to change". Nothing to argue about there. But actually, that's exactly what most people like about bitcoin, it's stable, it's thoughtful, it's careful. Also every sovereign currency that goes off the gold standard eventually fails, that will eventually apply to the USD.
@@MisteMiner i agree. Nice actual counterargument. I am a huge ADA bull but I didn't like his argument here. Charles argues that Bitcoin doesn't evolve and then asks why Lightning is being developed. He can't have it both ways.
He’s right. I think BTC will stagnate as holders realize it’s only demand is as a limited edition collectible. The demand will wane. Blockchains that have some useful utility to generate demand will be the winners in the long run.
@@jovanrado9548 is that really being naive? I don't undereatimate Bitcoin. Bitcoin is a safe bet. I just think one peticular Crypto is better in almost every way so if I think that I am not the only one. And Bitcoin maxis don't really want to know anything about it. They call it a scam or at best ghost chain. Well they can't call it ghostchain today :)
What people in the Bitcoin space fail to see, which is not addressed by Breedlove, Saylor, Kaiser and other thought leaders is that immutability is a double edged sword. Yes this provides stability and security today, but it will lay bare some catastrophic vulnerabilities to the security of the entire network when quantum computers become mainstream. We are about 15 years away, perhaps less, from logical cubits that have conquered quantum noise and distortions, at which point a single quantum computer with about 4000 logical cubits will be able to solve RSA-2048 encryption, at which point with a snap of a finger, the entire Bitcoin network can be hacked. Post-quantum crypto is coming, and having governance systems embedded into the very blockchain tech you use will be vital to ensure juggernaut cryptocurrencies that exist today can not just be ragdolled by quantum computers. Most cryptos don't even think about these kinds of problems, and bitcoin least of all. It really is built for the modern age today, but waves of innovation are coming that will expose Bitcoin's inadequacies in the future. Don't ever trust people telling you immutable layer 1 technology could hold millions or billions of dollars for hundreds of thousands of years in the future when 20 years from now a single quantum computer will be able to bamboozle the whole network.
@@kha_2428 That's true my friend, but even though in the age before insulation and fire we feared the cold, we still knew winter would come, which required making preparations ahead of time. The sooner you do this, the better because just like developing applications on top of C++ or Python, one update to C++ or Python can lead to a cascading of errors through the app sphere since interdependencies and libraries and function calls are all written based on previous language versions, you could have a similar problem with layer 2 tech failing from updates to layer 1. This is why Ethereum is migrating to Ethereum 2 since the entangled, dangling mess of products and companies built on top of Ethereum 1 prevent any change. How do you expect Bitcoin to adjust its course when the tidal wave of quantum computing looms in the distance? Its like trying to steer a fleet of fishing boats all ensnared together by fishing nets, some boats will go left, some right, some will stay the course, but because of entanglement, they share a common destiny. Please, please, please let's toggle the maximalism, certain cryptos like Bitcoin have become religions which is fine, but as we've seen from how the crowds grabbed their pitchforks and torches when Robert Breedlove dared to explore non-Bitcoin currencies, we could be dooming ourselves. Blockchain is a god-like alien technology and yet many of us (i'm guilty of this too) revert to tribal and apish tendencies around it.
@@lukahead6 ion kno where u from but where my family has always lived its HOT year round but it rains ALOT im sure you could guess which continent im talkin bout
quantum computing is similar to fusion energy. Everyone saying it is just 10 years away and 30 years have passed. btw when quantum computing does arrive you are screwed because no transaction anywhere on the internet will be secure and you can say goodby to your personal privacy.
Quantum hacking can't touch my cold wallet. Fiat is no safer from Quantum computers, unless you stuff your mattress. Even then there's no protection from the fed printing your savings into worthlessness.
Could you interview someone from the monero core developer team? This coin does not get enough attention jet its the one that models paper money like anonymity.
Any coin pre-mined or having a private ICO, pre public market, is designed to make insiders wealthy, not you! Bitcoin is a fair distribution until year 2140, currently 900 coins issued per day, set at free market price.
Bitcoin is bitcoin. Just as gold is gold. Its not designed to sing, dance and acrobatics. You have singers, dancers and acrobatics to do all that. Then you have circuses that do everything.
Bitcoin is a tool for building a security system that is not dependent on governments. As for the Cardano project, Ethereum and others are trying to connect governments to people again. What can be built using the value of Bitcoin has no limits, as we can build a currency like the dollar, but using Bitcoin as a cover and so on
Mainframes have not died for decades, because they WORK and, surprise, the programs running on them are quick. Not oversophisticated, boring user interface, but efficient.
So what? The old spectrum computer 48k from the 1980s is the culmination of 30 years of engineering achievement but it has nothing on today’s dumbest smart phone. Ethereum and cardano are clear advancements on Bitcoin technology, which is stagnating. Please stop drinking the saylor coolaid and start thinking for yourself! Bitcoin is yahoo, Ethereum is google
@@anastasiawhite7482 They have advancements towards a different purpose. They do not add those features without drawbacks. It is not all benefit, with no compromises. Nobody is going to create "the next" Bitcoin, it is a one time event. Ethereum especially. The government could go into a building and shut down Ethereum. They can not do that to Bitcoin.
@@anastasiawhite7482 Well that's funny because I use Duck Duck Go and Yahoo Finance every day, but never use google...Don't be evil, ironic how that used to be Google's mantra. we are still battling centralization, and Cardano is one of the most centralized projects out there.
He lost me when he said that gold backed currency didn’t work and we can’t go back to it. Yeah. It didn’t work because centralised governments began to devalue the gold backed paper currency to finance war! That’s the only reason it failed. And so he didn’t realise that, surprisingly
What he is talking about as an "improvement" was done by many, yet people keep holding BTC and not switching. Why? Maybe a lucky mistake or maybe by design, it's digital gold. And id we did what he proposed it would turn to just another coin. (saying this as a Cardano believer)
"There is no way to change the system" ... Well isn't that the idea? People buy into the system that is the most secure and descentralized?.. If Cardano is well below in market cap than Bitcoin.. Then there must be a missing key fundamental that you can't see Charles.. That is, no one will put their value into a network that has a CEO behind
@@Atilakus apple and their wildly integrated ecosystem, they were the first. also, the iPhone is by far the phone that accounts for the majority of money made within the business. The vast majority of manufacturers make no money or worst sell at a loss.
@@ig7567 In which industry was Apple the first one? Not PCs, media devices or mobile phones, but successful in learning from the competition, and becoming relentless innovators. It’s hard for me to think of a first comer in any industry that’s still on top. If you’re not innovating, you’re gone.
3:29. If you ignore what Bitcoin is actually solving for, and you just look at this with your silicon valley hat that change is always good, then obviously the thing that changes the fastest is going to win. Despite the fact Bitcoin is preoccupied with the idea of personal sovereignty, which means rules but no rulers, and that quick change always implies centralization and central control. So Etherium has already failed. The goal here is not to build the same system we already have, just in cyberspace, it's to build an egalitarian system beyond the reach of overloads.
Charles says he doesn't understand the direction of Bitcoin, Lex points him in the direction, and Charles dismisses it. He's blinding himself from Bitcoin. He's ngmi
I think he knows it better than most of us, and if he didn't, who would, Bill gates? It's like telling a pharmacist, he doesn't know about medicine. His critique is valid as he's a specialist in this field, and there would be other specialists who have differing opinions to his, and their opinions would be valid as well.
@@kha_2428 the limitations he mentioned are known, and other experts have used the same points he says are limitations to be actual advantages and what sets it apart from the alt coins. So there's a bit of perspective here, but his opinion holds more weight than random people holding some coins in their wallet.
All due respect, academics wanting to 'evolve' Bitcoin again. While Core team tried it's hardest to NOT evolve it, thus creating a number of forks and L1s whose main marketing is 'evolved bitcoin'.
Btc fixes all the problems with current monetary policy. All your "solutions" are yet to be proven. I hold ADA and like the project but trying to make the case for it with such arguments is rather lame and frankly doesn't help the ecosystem as a whole.
@@user-tu2dr3ny6x the bitcoin network has been working safely and truly decentralized for more than a decade. It hasn't been bridged and does what it is supposed to do. Thus, It's proven. Proof of stake hasn't been used yet in highly capitalized projects and personaly I think it raises a lot of questions regarding equitable access, security and decentralization in the future. We shall see.
Ahh yes all of the problems with fiat money being solved by a “currency” that’s value is decided in fiat money and exchanged for fiat money, traded in fiat money, and used as a way for people to get more fiat money. The honest person says it’s a way to transfer real money with less oversight or a way to get more real money. The problem Bitcoin solves for most is it gives them more fiat money to spend on something real when they sell it during a spike. A giant pyramid that makes people wealthy. Coming from a holder of multiple cryptos
I love all the salt in the comments. Yet not one person made a single valid counter argument to anything Charles said. We should never let the price of ANY investment make us deaf to logic and truth.
Most Bitcoin “investors”, which are most of the whiners in the comments, have NO CLUE what that even means. And yes, that is a valid argument. As was a lot of what Charles pointed out about the flaws.
What if one day people just move to a different coin and people just get bored of Bitcoin? At least with Eth and Cardano their value derives from their use cases. Bitcoin's value is just ascribed from thin air at this point.
There is a flaw to Charles argument - no loans in gold- people use USD for loans which floats enormously against their local currency, actually most developing countries are in this situation. The problem with gold is it’s not a bearer asset But BTC is, only 12 words are needed.
@@NoiseRoxx lol oh. I didn’t finish the whole 5 hours 😁. I just know in the past he said good things. But I guess if you designed a car you would talk yours up even above ones your peers made.
The problem with btc, is the btc maxis, What does it matter what coin you hold. Invest in what you believe in and allow others to do the same. Some of the comments below are so out there… Have a blessed day people
The simplicity of BTC is one of it's greatest features.
Simple yes, but slow, energy-inefficient, hard to upgrade, unminable for most regular people, and with zero privacy. All of those properties have already been improved by orders of magnitudes by other projects. Once BTC stops being no 1 in Market Cap who's gonna want to own it?
@@ByGraceThroughFaith777 "Once BTC stops being no 1 in Market Cap who's gonna want to own it?" Agreed.
Do you use the Exodus wallet? Add "Nano" to the main portfolio, then go into the Nano wallet, copy and paste the Nano public address here, and I'll send you some Nano. Then you decide which is better for real world transactions and store of value.
This isn't financial advice. Do your Due Diligence.
Like a tractor
@Smokestack Lightnin' Explain. I'm open to learning if mistaken.
"There's no way to change the system"
Well thank god for that!!
i mean that's exactly the point
@@mattpkp wrong. They added new features. The monetary rules are the same.
If he wants to be a power hungry nerd who gets hard only when bending networks to his will, he should work at the Alphabet companies. That's where his gang is.
@@mattpkp in which planet do you live ? When did the core system of blockchain and mining change on earth ?
then it becomes a legacy.. tech that does not evolve is not relevant. Horse and cart, ICE engine, Mainframe computers, tapes, CD's, records, list goes on, and BTC will be on that list if it cannot evolve and move with the market.
It's not about how capable it is. it is about being completely absolutely decentralized
It's not decentralized
@@paulg451 it is, there is no choke point, no CEO.
Yes very decentralized with most of the miners being in China! haha (or used to be) .. however to mine you have to have alot of money, which puts it in the hands of the few. That to me is not decentralized.
You are 100% clueless on Bitcoin.
Bitcoin core is controlled by Blockstream. They have butchered a great invention.
@@eddieserrano2792 Research Blockstream and BTC. That should tell you how "decentralized" BTC is.
The essence is that the bitcoin community wants to ensure that any individual on earth with a decent internet connection can run a full node; this is only possible by keeping the block size small and therefore if scaling happens on layer 2, not on the main chain. Today, as an individual it is almost impossible to run your own ethereum node, which is bad for decentralization.
This is a joke, you'd need tens of thousands of dollars in Asics to have any legitimate non-zero probability of your node ever minting a block.
Sure, this was the intent, but there was never intended to be this much processing power on the network.
The exact opposite has happened: the network is centralized in asic farms in one region in China.
People just need to recognize that this didn't work. Many, many superior solutions have been developed. There's even an entire academic field devoted to studying blockchain consensus mechanisms. We have solutions in spades, and many have already been implemented. There's no reason to still care about Bitcoin, except that it's so full of hype that you can make a buck speculating...if you get out in time. It already crashed when people learned about the (very real) electricity issue. Who knows if it will come back? If it does, it will only be to die later when more people learn how old-fashioned it is. Name recognition isn't everything.
@@geometerfpv2804 You're mistaken. We're talking about full nodes, NOT mining nodes. Full nodes are nodes that keep their own record of the bitcoin blockchain and who enforce the consensus rules. You can run a full node for $200; all you need is a raspberry pi and a 1TB memory card, that's it. This is not possible with ethereum.
To add to your point, to run a full Bitcoin node takes about 400 GB of space right now while Ethereum (Archive node) is 7.5TB. This has caused complete Ethereum nodes to most of the time be run on cloud servers that are subject to cease and desist orders by sovereign nations, or corporations that own them disallowing their continued use. This is very bad for decentralization because now the only ones that can verify account balances on Ethereum are large entities as opposed to any average person with a $200 setup or even existing computer in most cases.
@@Ba55gui Average person can do bit coin mining on a $200 set up? Are you a moron?
@@vgeorge101 Not mining, a full node. Nodes verify the blockchain and enforce consensus rules on the network. It’s equally as important as mining but for different reasons
The biggest problem that I have and most people have with bitcoin is that I didn’t invest in it when it was .25 cents a coin!!
this is the reason any bitcoin video cant have decent comment discussion, its just shitheads already invested trying to keep the hype up. yes we get it, but maybe we can talk about some of the actual things he said instead of using every bitcoin video comment section as an advertisement for bitcoin
I was in the game back then. there were no exchanges available. so everybody mined.
@@catiex8826 There is no arguing against things these days. All you can really do is build/support something better and encourage people in that direction. Instead of constantly telling someone not to do stupid thing after stupid thing get them doing something good that can keep their focus and stop them from doing all the dumb stuff.
Feels bad. Hopefully, you will become a future millionaire!
@@catiex8826 totally agree, everyone tries defend their investments, but BTC maxies arguments are falling short for why BTC is and will always be the KING, and all they do these days is repeat and repeat the same rhetoric they hear from Pomp and other youtubers preaching to the choir. The BTC community has slowly shifted from a beautiful thing a few years ago to a toxic environment full of Pomps and Keisers going on tours to promote BTC with titles like "F*ck Elon", and calling any blockchain innovation a shitcoin while reluctantly oppose to any change to improve the thing they love for the better.
"You have to ask yourself, what incentive does the system have to evolve?" None Charles. BTC has reinvented money. That is enough.
Has it? But really, has it? It's only 1% of global transactions, and it's been around now for 10 years. It hasn't really reinvented anything except its own Bro culture.
BTC has not reinvented money. It would be so if people actually used it as money, but they don't, because bitcoin sucks at processing transactions.
Btc is NOT money, and has not reinvented money
@@Igor_054It’s more secure than USD is for settlement.
Paying for a coffee or a new phone ia overrated. Btc is a store of value, it’s reinvented gold. It’s because of golds inconvenience to be used as a currency why we switched to fiat standard. Btc is the moat scarse property known to man kind. Cardano is a centralised scam. Time will tell.
All the "problems" he described spell one thing to me, security.
I'm big on ADA, but I fully agree. Security through simplicity.
I don't think you know how to spell very well.
Is Charles going crazy?...Glass half full perspective: Bitcoin is base monetary layer with Cardano and Ethereum application layer built on top. Charles sees the evolution without the organism niches. The religious aspect is a feature fueling the game theory not a bug. Bitcoin is the best store value across time and space. 'It's too slow' is loser think with Bitcoin Network maturing in front of our eyes, how about Lightning & Sovryn? Come for the speculation, stay for the monetary policy.
You’re missing the points on smart contracts, mining centralization, and transaction latency.
@@trustno1830 Yeah and we should follow your logic and build modern cars on top of steam engines.
6:33. Yes, repeatedly. There are many examples of successful nations built off of the gold standard. There are no examples of successful nations built off of fiat. Nations start on hard money, then they move to soft money, then they die. Bitcoin is designed to be the hardest money, and to not have the attack vectors which allow the transition from hard to soft in the first place.
What successful nations have been built off the gold standard?
@@TheMonkeygrunt The United States of America for starters. America only STARTED to depart from the gold standard in the early 20th century, and only just fully left it in 1971. In fact, most of all of Europe was on a gold standard leading up to WWI. Going further back. Rome was on a gold standard. Florence was on a gold standard. Both failed after they started to debase it. History keeps repeating this theme over and over and over again. You may benefit from reading "The Bitcoin Standard" by Saifedean Ammous.
@ILoveTacoTuesday I guess you didn't read my comments. We started on the gold standard, we have since been slowly transitioned to a fiat standard, and now everything is becoming unstable. (Also Florence maintained their gold standard for over 500 years, so hard money works as long as you stay on it.)
@ILoveTacoTuesday Anything 'could' happen, however, things are looking very promising for Bitcoin. The item I find more concerning isn't so much the "if" we transition to Bitcoin (hard to really see it going any other way), but more under what terms. Usually monetary transitions are VERY painful. Now, on the plus side, things are shaping up in such a way that a smoother transition is looking possible. That's what I'm hoping for.
@ILoveTacoTuesday The reason that the market always centers on the hardest money has nothing to do with whether people have any power or not. It's just like how free markets always outcompete planned markets. Like I recommended before in this thread, I believe you'd benefit greatly from a deep dive into Austrian economics, and The Bitcoin Standard would be a good jumping off spot. Unless you really want to jump into the deep end with Mises and Human Action.
You know what's great about #bitcoin.
Guys like this can't fuck it up.
As the Fonz would say: exactamondo!
amen
Yes. It's the ONLY decentralised coin. All the others just need a knock on the door of their San Fran 'headquarters' by the FBI and it's all over.
Imagine thinking Bitcoin was decentralized xD:
4 pools own over 54% of the computing power in the network right now.
@@spleenware this is not true, even if Charles dies cardano will exist...
Even the FBI can't shut it down now.
it wont die. it will coexist. like what paul tudor jones say: bitcoin is precious crypto. the rest will be transactional crypto. i totally agree this will be the future.
Paul Tudor Jones doesn't understand the possibilities of Layer 2.
Precious Crypto?
What..lol
Brb, buying my GF some Bitcoin jewlery.
If you want to know the truth, the price of Crypto has a lot to do with it trading on an unregulated market.
@@MeursaultYT sour grape
The best one will win. By win I mean - become the largest.
I'm actually glad I traded all of my ADA bags for BTC not too long ago before the crash.
Good bear market move. I wonder how that might age in the bull tho.
"Can't do anything interesting or unique there."
Well, we've had nearly a god damn century of Wall Street, hedge funds, corporations, governments, and the FED doing "interesting" and "unique" things with and to the money supply. Maybe having a simple, hard, sound, scarce, and predictable money supply is the most interesting and unique thing we have left.
Spot on! All these fancy derivatives and complicated constructions just obfuscate the fact that the base layer is shitty and that these greedy companies just run unproven experiments, remember the heydays of mortgage backed securities and credit default swaps?
Proof of stake centralizes control. It’s that simple
Too bad most people dont realised it
@Tom Gadbois so what?? Bitcoin nodes are spread far and wide. ADA main nodes? (Only IOHK and cardano holds them) opps
@Tom Gadbois we buy bitcoin to escape the FED, not to join a new FED (ADA/IONK/ fed chairman Charles hoskinson)
@Tom Gadbois whats the difference?.. proof of stake is literally printing coins from thin air.. like the fed money printer goess Bbbbrrrrrrr
@Tom Gadbois POS is very centralised system..those who hv more ADA will get more ADA from staking.. that equals to more power in governance..guess who has the most ADA? Hint: the founders
The main problem with Bitcoin is Charles won't get rich if you buy BTC over ADA.
He has enough money. XD
His kids kids could be sipping margaritas with no worries at its current price.
Charles is a billionaire, he couldn't care less.
Charles already a billionaire.
You realize he has a bunch of BTC, right? Bitcoin has SO SO SO SO SO many problems that Cardano is trying to solve.
I believe Robert Breedlove would say something here along the lines of ,"What you are failing to realize, is that the first to marketability on a protocol network will reign supreme in a world of protocol." Amongst other amazing advancements and things like Jack Mallers and his work in Lightning and how true Defi can only be built on the Bitcoin blockchain, it is also a shame to hear Charles speak hastily with such emotion against inevitability. As Yassine from ARK would say, "don't bite the hand that feeds you." Bitcoin is freedom.
Ego will kill this guy
I kinda get his point but......did the gold reserve really not work? or the problem was it worked too well and they had to bring it down?
Dollar was redeemable with gold to the point they had to many Dollars vs gold. Solution: Fiat. So in a sense it failed. In both scenarios printing too much currency is not good
@@gokkmokk1 So it must naturally be asked, doesn't this mean a similar fate for Bitcoin? My guess is Legacy Finance is going to have their own centralized coin(s).
The gold standard failed because the US was trusted to hold all the gold and not print fiat unbacked by gold. The US could not be trusted.
@@thephilosopher7173 That is a good guess
@@zedzed5276 I think maybe exchange the word “US”with “bankers” . Unfair to paint an entire nation with the one brush
5:32. This is profoundly disingenuous. Plenty of people can tell you what Bitcoin is for. It's to provide a "truly" decentralized monetary foundation which is beyond the reach of corruptive entities, and every engineering trade off was made to that end. It wasn't trying to be all things to all people, it was trying to solve the fundamental attack vectors of gold, which always resulted in gold being disintermediated as the monetary foundation of society. Bitcoin is designed to be everything gold always wanted to be and strong enough to hold on if it ever makes it to that status. Cardano and Ethereum on the other hand are the entities which are suffering from an identity crisis, as they try to be all things to all people.
This is profound. That's what i was caught thinking, "why does he expect btc to do so much?" It's doing what it needs to do. It's like expecting the internet to BE youtube, google, apple and amazon all at once. Do you have a twitter?
Can you explain why ADA can't do what BTC can?
21 million in an inflationary fiat tidal wave... Bitcoin remains king due to network effect and scarcity. It is digital gold.
People seem to believe that the wealthy elite wouldn't be able to hoard Bitcoin.
What's left for the paupers when that happens?
@@crotchy7667 good thing bitcoin isn't proof of stake.
@@crotchy7667 the hedge funds hoarding bitcoin for them and thats how they manipulate the crypto market
How's btc king when it was outperformed by almost every big cap alt coin this bull run?
Charles: Layer 1 is hard to change
Me: Good. I don’t want me money easy to change
More like don't change my money, but, if something unforeseen happens and my money does need to change, it shouldn't be nearly impossible to change it. He has a point, and that's proven by the Taproot upgrade.
Everyone still measures the 'success' of crypto currencies in government backed fiat currencies.
You have a better sugestion ?
I think the point is that it’s not actually backed, at least for the full valuation of the fiat amount
No, you do. Projection. Smart people measure it in terms of purchasing power - since the narrative is a store of value
Point being? People also measure house valuation in terms of government-backed fiat currencies. You're free to use another denominator (though doing so might put you out of sync with the crypto trading market).
@@pmc9194 'point being' that crypto is often heralded as a superior form of currency which will replace government fiat... and yet if you couldn't exchange crypto for government fiat, nobody would want it.
Cardano has a CEO; BITCOIN doesn’t . Thats where the value is .
We all crave a righteous king
Preach! You can’t sue Bitcoin. Decentralization is king!
@@labradorviewer2789 xDD
Exactly. CEOs are corruptible and I am not gonna put my life savings into something that is owned by a government entity or a ceo.
WRONG!!
Cardano is the MOST decentralised blockchain and by its nature has NO centralised point of control or “CEO”
Charles Hoskinson is the CEO of IOHK!!
If you know very little about Bitcoin - this guy sounds like he is making a ton of sense. If you know a lot about Bitcoin - you’re sitting here thinking something quite different. It’s difficult to describe how little sense he makes.
Can you point out a single thing he said that "doesn't make sense"?
He created the Bitcoin education project that had over 70,000 participants 🤷🏿♂️ 😊
@@reignvry6725 and yet he is deliberately downplaying the store of value aspect of bitcoin, the immutability aspect of bitcoin, the fact that it has no centralized authority to change it. You should watch some videos on why Bitcoin is different than Ethereum and other cryptocurrencies so you can see him for what he is.
It doesnt matter what he participated in, if he is projecting a message that is ultimately deceiving for his own personal gain.
@@typicalhog That people doesnt understand Bitcoin. Which fair enough, but he's framing it in a way that is to get people off of Bitcoin and on to his platform.
@@KyngD469 Yeah, because Bitcoin has flaws and "his platform" improves on Bitcoin and is IMO better.
Bitcoin is practically finished product on the main chain. It serves its purpose as store of value perfectly. Almost all other coins are not finished products. Cardano is practically still a ghost chain! Even ETH is unfinished product. The current price of Cardano is just a market expectation about its future!
Im holding everything
I guess people have different opinions on what bitcoin is however I agree with you.
I mean if you listen to Hoskinson's argument, his whole point (and I'd agree) is that Bitcoin is *not* (or at least should not be) a finished product. If it does not improve, it will eventually, inevitably, be left in the dust, because many superior ideas have been developed since Bitcoin came out. It may take a long time for other coins to "catch up," but they eventually will. Yes, Bitcoin does work. It works great, and personally I believe it is here to stay for the foreseeable future. But it cannot do what many other coins can do. And unless people stop viewing it as "finished," it never will. Again, that doesn't mean Bitcoin will die; it *does* mean that there is room for other coins that do more than Bitcoin can.
EDIT: I should also address the comment about price--price is an irrelevant factor when it comes to the success of the technology. If the goal is to move away from fiat, then the goal is only reached once the fiat price of the coin is unimportant. As long as the fiat price of the coin is an important factor, that means the mission has not yet succeeded. Obviously it has made a bunch of people really wealthy, and that's great for them--I have no issue with that. But it's not relevant to the ultimate success or failure of any of these technologies.
@@JamesBlacklock Exactly, and if anyone says Ethereum is not currently performing is deluded. Unfortunately for Bitcoin a Cult like following has/is developing around it which is very, very bad for not just BTC but the space in general. I really hope they don't indirectly set BTC up to fail and drag the entire Blockchain industry down with it.
@@JamesBlacklock That is nice and found response but I said that BTC is finished on the main chain. Lets see what developer can give to us on layer 2 or side chains. We already have the lightning network and lets see what developers can do about BTC smart contracts (Stacks). There is plent of room to grow on BTC layer 2 areas.
I respect Charles but I think he underestimates the importance of the Bitcoin protocol being outside the reach of "the powers that be". Then, he talks highly of ETH which would be extremely easy to cease control of or shut down. This is what "shit coin" refers to. These projects are new technology but all built within reach of the same corrupt individuals who control the current system.
To take control of ethereum you need to invest $400 billion. Very easy lol
@@anastasiawhite7482 to individuals.
Not a group, institution or country
Bitcoins aim to be the hardest Asset in the universe, so ofc you can't just change it. If Bitcoin is not hard to change it wouldn't live up to it's goal.
When a decentraliserad system that promise on a monetary policy that should not change succeed - you get a system that will not change. What's so hard to understand about that?
What Bitcoin has to do is to move the Assets transactions to a different layer.
The Asset should be hard, the network should be open for innovationen.
Guess what? This is happening.
@Travel City
How it's taxed depends on the rules in your country, has nothing with Bitcoin to do and nowdays it's not traceable.
You can teleport your coins around in the Lightning Network, try trace that...
@Travel City that's not true. Bitcoin allow your UTXO to escape in different layers where they cannot be tracked. On the blockchain this look like your UTXO is not moving, but in reality you can move your funds in the speed of light!
@Travel City You can use Bitcoin in many different ways. If you buy with KYC on an exchange and use it normally you will leave a trace back to your identity.
If you coin join and/or use Lightning your trail will fade away..
@Travel City you forgot to mention Blockstream.
Blockstream =/= decentralization.
“ What the hell is the point of bitcoin?” ... it’s called decentralization, security, and freedom. This is really tempting me to sell my cardano since he clearly doesn’t understand the time tested strength of btc and the lightning network.
I know he understands it . He’s just pushing cardano at the expense of btc . He understands security is important and has admitted that btc is secure. You can’t have max security scalability and decentralization , only 2 of 3. Or all three are diminished
Lol sell your 50 ADA because you can't handle an argument. You're not special kid
don’t sell your shit over that bro lol
Idk when he recorded this podcast but charles saying “bitcoin hasnt gotten any more adoption”. Buddy a whole ass country just adopted it and many too follow
After El Salvador
The adoption by El Salvador is not exactly genius...it's more of a publicity stunt than anything, they are trying to get people to use them as an off-shore crypto haven to bring money into the country. A huge number of people in El Salvador don't even have basic bank accounts.
@@geometerfpv2804 The fact they don't have basic bank accounts is the reason they need bitcoin
@@geometerfpv2804 your comment wont age well. Once other countries in that area adopts bitcoin
@@geometerfpv2804 yeah but the ones that do have a bank account use bitcoin.
Now I understand how religions are made. Just take a good look at this comment section.
even the likes and dislikes lol
Im not an expert and no native speaker. But did they mention one of the biggest Pro´s for Bitcoin - the decentralization? That´s a rly important USP for BTC. A system of rules instead of system leaded by rulers. That´s one of the main differences to our current Money-System, which makes it beside the mathematical limitation (scarcity) so valueable.
So buy more Bitcoin, right?
Charles will do what’s best for us. We can trust him.
“I can’t for the life of me understand the point of bitcoin,” 😂. It’s the reserve currency for the digital monetary system. Simple. Complete.
That another crypto asset can perform ... along with OTHER utility haha.. That is the whole point you clowns are not getting..
@NEW no I got tired of listening
@@Miroshen yeah, it shows
@@cryptocrunch413 you probably don't understand what it means to be the reserve currency yet...
Historically, reserve currencies have been backed by immense political power.
Your gold is worthless if the state can seize it at the ports.
Btc provides a completely different way to think of what backs a reserve currency... And that is: *immutability* at the protocol level.
This is the only feature that no shitcoin or cbdc will implement...
Immutability is the alternative to strong political power.
How? Imagine for a second that the US is replaced as the global leader. The USD crumbles under its debt weight.
Being a global reserve currency as a political and military force is great... However, the position of the global world leader isnt permanent. Hence storing wealth beyond a millennia becomes impossible.
Unless of course you had a protocol that is independent of any state, Central Bank , and is also immutable for a 100 years.
If it wasn't, then BTC protocol will change under immense political pressure.
It is vitally important that the leader of the decentralised digital Economy stays immutable.
Then we can have layer2's, altcoins, shitcoins, third-party services and exchanges... experiment with varying levels of security and immutability.
As they continue to introduce BTC to the world.
Money is simply a database of transactions.
Your USD, dollars etc is worth nothing in an island with no economic activity.
@@kennethmayor3596 It remains to be seen if the BTC protocol has not actually fked itself already. How will it reward miners to secure the network when there is not much left to mine, and LN pays them nothing. I think this is important to think about, and how POS networks are superior in their design, by rewarding stakers to secure the network. The fact that BTC is extremely hard to change does not bode well into the future.
Gold is still gold last few 1000 years
Just sold all my ADA after watching this
Why is that ? ....I am currently not putting all my eggs in the crypto basket
What? All 5 of your ADA? Lol fuck outta here.
Don’t get discouraged by Charles lack of understanding.. he knows the truth but he needs to sell a product where bitcoin doesn’t need to. aDA still has value despite this.
@@knockoutfever4 id be willing to bet Charles understand crypto more than 99% of the people in the comment section. He created a top ten crypto that's being used by nation states. What have you tards done other than pretend to be smarter than him?
Why? Because he was right? Because he said what could make Bitcoin better, instead of making vague negative statements, like everyone here in the comment section. If you really did sell, then it is truly your loss.
Bitcoin only needs to exist, and it needs to work. ALWAYS. It forms the concrete foundation upon which every other cryptocurrency derives it's legitimacy. Leave it be, and leave the innovation to every other project
This is a super insightful comment. Thank you.
Just like the internet...
Innovations and USP's becomes irrelevant if the underlying protocol ceases to exist.
Comparing BTC to a programming language or a football star Is the dumbest thing I have heard from a billionaire.
To be honest, if Bitcoin succeeds, there is no need for Cardano. So he does have to try and bad mouth Bitcoin.
if
@@fabiosilva9637 oops I meant when
"if" hahaha ya ok
That’s just not true they can coexist
@@tilley7242 keep holding onto your Cardano to the moon dreams, its ok
Super cool that you interview a guy like CH on here! I love to see it!
I think the thing he misses about Bitcoin is its immutability.
He spends most of this segment talking about all the extra amazing things other chains can do and how they’re all built upon the bedrock of developmental growth. And then says “I can’t for the life of me understand the point of Bitcoin.”
The point is that Bitcoin doesn’t change. And when something doesn’t change we give it our trust. And when we can trust something it is natural to invest in it.
I love lex but I cant watch him unless it’s at 1.5x
Amen brother.
Imagine if he took cannabis. You'd have to listen at 2x.
Lags Freedman
News flash everyone. They are different things with different use cases! Feel free to come down from your high horses. Careful you don't turn into the tyrant you are trying to escape from. You're allowed to have and like both. Gotta love that democracy stuff 😉
A big portion of RUclips holders don’t actually like bitcoin, they just want to get rich off of it.
Cardano is a government sponsored project meant to divide and conquer the crypto community
@@johnrodriguez7099 I think you mean Bitcoin. Have you heard Bitcoin maxis talk about shitcoins and scamcoins? Heard "Bitcoin not blockchain"? :)
The most level-headed comment I’ve come across in months
Gold standard was the best system ever build..
It sure WAS.
I don't disagree with you. However, gold had one enormous flaw - governments were able to interfere and regulate it, make laws that undermined its natural market value, hobble ownership, confiscate it in wartime, forbid its transfer, write promissory notes that were not honoured, and finally replaced it with an arbitrary inflationary fiat. They will probably do the same with Bitcoin - ban the sale of it, forbid exchanges to sell it, close BTC ATMS, increase taxes on transactions, increase capital gains... etc. Power is ruthless and doesn't give it up easily.
@@Jane_under_a_tree_with_a_book Governments can *not* interfere with it, thats the problem. Gold worked for thousands of years but modern governments are to expensive to run on gold, so they invented currency. If they need to spend more then they have, they print more of it and spend it. Because now there is more of it around its value decreases aka inflation. The cost of the inflation is payed by the population, as their "money" is now worth less. They can't simply print more gold tho. In wartime or during economic crisis, other countries shit on your worthless currency so you need gold to buy stuff. For that reason Roosevelt for example outlawed possession of gold coin and bullion in 1933, people had to sell it to the government for currency.
@@hernerweisenberg7052 It is silly to say governments cannot interfere with BTC when they already have/are, on many levels, in various countries and jurisdictions. Although they cannot touch the actual protocol, they can dampen people's ability to trade with it. Cryptocurrencies are easily delisted from exchanges making it difficult to trade - the USA treatment of XRP comes to mind. Payment of BTC for goods or services is illegal in Russia. Politicians can spread significant FUD - for example Warren (USA). In 1933, it was a criminal offense for US citizens to own or trade gold anywhere in the world (with exceptions for some jewelry) - they could do the same to BTC using, for example, terrorism laws. I am pro-BTC and buy as much as I can - but I am not blind to the ways that governments and the banking systems can dampen mass adoption when the owners of the financial systems are threatened.
@@Jane_under_a_tree_with_a_book I didn't say anything about crypto currency.
With all respect to Cardano people, why does Bitcoin actually need to do any of that crap? So that random people who don't even want to design anything of their own can make low-effort Ponzi Tokens like Shib and Hokk and whatever else there is? Security and resistance against government regulation are the most important.
Staking is great to benefit and get funding from rich VC's but with so many coins held on centralized exchanges (subject to political pressure, corruption and coercion) and the disproportionate allocation of governance to rich interests, they really they really can't compare to a well-adopted, fairly-mined POW system.
Charles should ask actual ETH miners what they think of EIP-1559 and POS if he thinks they love upgrading so much lol.
Holy crap this comment section somehow actually sees Atari as superior to PS5. This won’t age well
That's not a proper comparison. It is more complex than that. There are trade-offs with these "new" systems. They are not all benefits with no drawbacks.
Lol I just compared it to ps4 had no idea the ps5 already came out
This comment section overwhelmingly understands the difference between layered protocols and end products. Protocols aren't supposed to change, products are.
No way ADA is superior.. nobody uses ADA. Alot people use bitcoin. Bitcoin aiming to be a global monetary reserve. ADA?
The biggest and most obvious weakness of ADA is sitting in front of you trying to tell you how great it is.
He is the influential frontman, the leverage point, the center of attacks.
This applies to EVERY other coin, token or crypto company except bitcoin.
What did he described gives Bitcoin it's security and decentralization things that ADA does not have in fact after watching this video I swapped my ada for more BTC
Charles is making a huge mistake by not making a really important distinction - Cardano and BTC are not alike, they are both categorically different. We will have and should have a space with multiple block chains that are working together not trying to win 1st place, that in itself is a type of centralization where one option exists and everything else is fundamentally subpar in all categories.
One can exist if it's not a security. Bitcoin isn't everything else worth mentioning is. If someone controls the money without sacrificing anything why even switch from fiat.
@@collinblatchford you are saying that "one money is only legit if the US government approve its usage" funny. i don`t need US permission. also competition is always good for the users. this idea that maxis have that only should exist btc is totalitarian shit. let the markets decide which will be more valuable
Maybe because FIAT is not capped supply but ADA and BTC are?@@collinblatchford
It's just natural that the better one will take suck up the majority of liquidity.
Schor sigs are being put in place with Taproot in November.
Do these ppl not understand Ada had a late start?! Lol Charles also doesn’t want to put out a half ass product. I’m good with that. You ppl are the NOW NOW NOW generation. With his market cap holding him at #4 Coin. Where’s the hurry?! Lol you guys are ridiculous. He’s coming out with updates all summer. Get off his nuts.
Seems like valuation and hype may be lil ahead of the project but thats not uncommon in cryptos
It's an obvious scam
and this is you missing the point. The problem they have with Charles here is that he's being dishonest when it comes to talking about Bitcoin. Discounting facts and in some cases lying directly to Lex and the audience when he doesn't have to. The method of talking he's using here is a big tell.
How do I start earning well from investing in trades ? 🤔
Get yourself a good/and trustedTrader
@@clackadam5663 yeah but my former trader didn’t impress me much, I lost a lot 😡
I realize i could turn trading from a passive income to my huge main source of income and was able to do so after i met with Mrs Tory she is a professional 💯🥰
@@clackadam5663 I'm new at this, How can i reach your broker.
You can reach her on TeIegram @ investwithtory
Money is not just technology. It is a belief system. If it’s only value is the state of the art technology behind it, your money will be replaced/disrupted every 4 years by more advanced technology. Hodl BTC. It’s almost a religion at this point.
My biggest problem with BTC is not having enough.
This guy has been hyping Cardano for years with not much to show for it….its price is tied to his nonstop shilling. Time to put up or shut up, Charles
And yet Cardano is about to become a smart contract POS coin a year or more ahead of Ethereum. Innovation takes time when done right. Same for electric cars. Same for crypto.
"with not much to show for it". Haven't read any of the papers that they have been putting out for years now, have you?
Cardano is miles ahead of most other projects. They are solving hard problems that the Bitcoin "community" is barely even thinking about.
It's much faster, cheaper and efficient than most others (Nano, IOTA are more efficient once they are truly decentralized) out there.
Wait a year. There will be tons of applications on cardano. There are already a lot of exciting projects going on.
Use the Lightning network if it's too slow?
The fact it's been around for over a decade is what gives BTC such credibility.
Etherium doesn't even have built in parity checks for wallet addresses. So easy to send Ether to the void; gone forever.
Depends. If your sending it somewhere centralized you may be good
Thanks Lex for pressing the issue of bitcoin and digital gold. This is the first time that Hoskinson has seemed very transparent to me. Really appreciate your work and your integrity.
Mr. Hoskins I don’t think we did actually ever try going back to the gold standard.
Lol yeah, and it "didn't work" because it limited governernments ability to print unlimited money.
@@jerensteffen Indeed. It's not like the general public got to vote on it and got rid of the gold standard by consensus. It's all decisions made by unelected private companies, a.k.a central banks.
As a Single Mother Crypto investments has helped me pay my bills and live happy. Wish I invested from the early days.
Several intelligent people are terrible investors because they face the market
With untrained physiology and untamed emotions. You need to Keep raw irrational emotions under control.
Really wish I knew what I know now several years ago in my early 20s Investing today is priceless because tomorrow isn't promised.
Trading Bitcoins , Stocks and Crypto secures a better future For us all..this I'm a testimony to.
This is correct. Look at it this way How many wealthy people or millionaires become wealthy by wages or salaries for saving in their bank accounts?
I'm sure you do not have a correct answer to that.
@@davidlewis2122 Funny enough they do not know how the fiat money losses its value as the days go by. Our global economic value keeps declining Dollar will soon not be the safe haven we all thought it was.
Thought I really wanted ADA, now Im not so sure anymore.
Yeah i don’t think I believe your comment. Sounds sus.
It's garbage. It's a fiat
@Vincent S Snake Oil Salesman, same thing I guess though
Lol then you should definitely stay away.
@@XxChuyoxX he is even worse... imo .. I do not like either one of them and is the reason I have not invested.. Now I do like $THETA
Anyone here actually tried creating a contract on the marlowe playground? If your serious about cardano and not experienced with coding I suggest trying to create a smart contract with blockly in the marlowe playground. If your watching this interview you have extra time on your hands!
LOL nobody in the comments who feel salty about his answer actually providing a counterargument
His argument is basically "bitcoin is old and slow to change". Nothing to argue about there. But actually, that's exactly what most people like about bitcoin, it's stable, it's thoughtful, it's careful. Also every sovereign currency that goes off the gold standard eventually fails, that will eventually apply to the USD.
@@MisteMiner i agree. Nice actual counterargument.
I am a huge ADA bull but I didn't like his argument here. Charles argues that Bitcoin doesn't evolve and then asks why Lightning is being developed. He can't have it both ways.
He’s right. I think BTC will stagnate as holders realize it’s only demand is as a limited edition collectible. The demand will wane.
Blockchains that have some useful utility to generate demand will be the winners in the long run.
Bitcoin has so much security built into it for all those years mining it, it dwarfs every other coin or token.
Until Cardano or Eth will replace it BTC will stare just as store of value
Vitalik saying nice things about Charles, Charles saying good things about Vitalik -- this is the way to win over bitcoin!
many have tried to win over bitcoin, many have failed…
@@juliovnobreonly takes one. The fight has just begun really
@@jovanrado9548 is that really being naive? I don't undereatimate Bitcoin. Bitcoin is a safe bet. I just think one peticular Crypto is better in almost every way so if I think that I am not the only one. And Bitcoin maxis don't really want to know anything about it. They call it a scam or at best ghost chain. Well they can't call it ghostchain today :)
What people in the Bitcoin space fail to see, which is not addressed by Breedlove, Saylor, Kaiser and other thought leaders is that immutability is a double edged sword. Yes this provides stability and security today, but it will lay bare some catastrophic vulnerabilities to the security of the entire network when quantum computers become mainstream. We are about 15 years away, perhaps less, from logical cubits that have conquered quantum noise and distortions, at which point a single quantum computer with about 4000 logical cubits will be able to solve RSA-2048 encryption, at which point with a snap of a finger, the entire Bitcoin network can be hacked. Post-quantum crypto is coming, and having governance systems embedded into the very blockchain tech you use will be vital to ensure juggernaut cryptocurrencies that exist today can not just be ragdolled by quantum computers. Most cryptos don't even think about these kinds of problems, and bitcoin least of all. It really is built for the modern age today, but waves of innovation are coming that will expose Bitcoin's inadequacies in the future. Don't ever trust people telling you immutable layer 1 technology could hold millions or billions of dollars for hundreds of thousands of years in the future when 20 years from now a single quantum computer will be able to bamboozle the whole network.
@@kha_2428 That's true my friend, but even though in the age before insulation and fire we feared the cold, we still knew winter would come, which required making preparations ahead of time. The sooner you do this, the better because just like developing applications on top of C++ or Python, one update to C++ or Python can lead to a cascading of errors through the app sphere since interdependencies and libraries and function calls are all written based on previous language versions, you could have a similar problem with layer 2 tech failing from updates to layer 1. This is why Ethereum is migrating to Ethereum 2 since the entangled, dangling mess of products and companies built on top of Ethereum 1 prevent any change. How do you expect Bitcoin to adjust its course when the tidal wave of quantum computing looms in the distance? Its like trying to steer a fleet of fishing boats all ensnared together by fishing nets, some boats will go left, some right, some will stay the course, but because of entanglement, they share a common destiny. Please, please, please let's toggle the maximalism, certain cryptos like Bitcoin have become religions which is fine, but as we've seen from how the crowds grabbed their pitchforks and torches when Robert Breedlove dared to explore non-Bitcoin currencies, we could be dooming ourselves. Blockchain is a god-like alien technology and yet many of us (i'm guilty of this too) revert to tribal and apish tendencies around it.
@@lukahead6 ion kno where u from but where my family has always lived its HOT year round but it rains ALOT im sure you could guess which continent im talkin bout
quantum computing is similar to fusion energy. Everyone saying it is just 10 years away and 30 years have passed. btw when quantum computing does arrive you are screwed because no transaction anywhere on the internet will be secure and you can say goodby to your personal privacy.
Quantum hacking can't touch my cold wallet.
Fiat is no safer from Quantum computers, unless you stuff your mattress. Even then there's no protection from the fed printing your savings into worthlessness.
Except Cardano is already thinking how to transition to quantum resistant crypto primitives. We'll be fine.@@tillasmax
Charles will go down as one of the most prolific scammers of all time
Agreed
Has this dude not heard of Lightning Network or Strike?
hahaha, your funny
BCH can do all of that on layer 1. Lightning network and Strike are scams
@@kevinteo8149 some L1 are scaling in such a way that also makes them insecure. They give up security on L1 for speed.
@@JohnDobbertin its not gonna happen for you friend. I'm sorry.
Could you interview someone from the monero core developer team? This coin does not get enough attention jet its the one that models paper money like anonymity.
Any coin pre-mined or having a private ICO, pre public market, is designed to make insiders wealthy, not you! Bitcoin is a fair distribution until year 2140, currently 900 coins issued per day, set at free market price.
It is perfectly Ok to disagree with Charles on as many areas as you want, but to suggest he doesn’t understand bitcoin etc…. The mind boggles.
it really boggles the mind. this man spent a good chunk of his life dedicated to crypto and people still suggest that he knows nothing
It's been almost 6 years and ADA is still a token with zero uses on a ghost chain.
You can now run smart contracts on Cardano. Keep up at the back…
@@Jericho642 No it has them on a testnet. Six years for smart contacts on a testnet. LMAOOOO
Brutal.
Bitcoin is bitcoin. Just as gold is gold. Its not designed to sing, dance and acrobatics. You have singers, dancers and acrobatics to do all that. Then you have circuses that do everything.
Hoskinson isn't just a clown, he's the entire circus!
Bitcoin is a tool for building a security system that is not dependent on governments. As for the Cardano project, Ethereum and others are trying to connect governments to people again. What can be built using the value of Bitcoin has no limits, as we can build a currency like the dollar, but using Bitcoin as a cover and so on
And why can't ADA be used for the same?
Mainframes have not died for decades, because they WORK and, surprise, the programs running on them are quick. Not oversophisticated, boring user interface, but efficient.
Bitcoin is the culmination of a multi-decade revolution. Charles overestimates his own intelligence.
So what? The old spectrum computer 48k from the 1980s is the culmination of 30 years of engineering achievement but it has nothing on today’s dumbest smart phone. Ethereum and cardano are clear advancements on Bitcoin technology, which is stagnating. Please stop drinking the saylor coolaid and start thinking for yourself! Bitcoin is yahoo, Ethereum is google
@@anastasiawhite7482 They have advancements towards a different purpose.
They do not add those features without drawbacks. It is not all benefit, with no compromises. Nobody is going to create "the next" Bitcoin, it is a one time event.
Ethereum especially. The government could go into a building and shut down Ethereum. They can not do that to Bitcoin.
@@mattizzle81 why do you think the government can shut down eth?
@@Joe-ic3oe Easy. "Knock knock.. hey Vitalik, do this or else."
Not the same as Bitcoin at all, not in the slightest.
@@anastasiawhite7482 Well that's funny because I use Duck Duck Go and Yahoo Finance every day, but never use google...Don't be evil, ironic how that used to be Google's mantra. we are still battling centralization, and Cardano is one of the most centralized projects out there.
He lost me when he said that gold backed currency didn’t work and we can’t go back to it. Yeah. It didn’t work because centralised governments began to devalue the gold backed paper currency to finance war! That’s the only reason it failed. And so he didn’t realise that, surprisingly
5:55 thanks Lex for using the appropriate language xD
@Hans Coventrierengemacht Hodl
I hate that shit
when was this interview please?
What he is talking about as an "improvement" was done by many, yet people keep holding BTC and not switching.
Why? Maybe a lucky mistake or maybe by design, it's digital gold. And id we did what he proposed it would turn to just another coin.
(saying this as a Cardano believer)
"There is no way to change the system" ... Well isn't that the idea? People buy into the system that is the most secure and descentralized?..
If Cardano is well below in market cap than Bitcoin.. Then there must be a missing key fundamental that you can't see Charles.. That is, no one will put their value into a network that has a CEO behind
everyone knows the best system doesnt always win
"being the best" is not always the desiding factor
you don't understand the naure of power
being the first most time is the most deciding factor
@@ig7567 name me one industry where the first stayed on top. Maybe there is one but 99.9% the first one is not on top after some time.
@@Atilakus apple and their wildly integrated ecosystem, they were the first. also, the iPhone is by far the phone that accounts for the majority of money made within the business. The vast majority of manufacturers make no money or worst sell at a loss.
and for the record I don't have an iPhone nor I love apple
@@ig7567 In which industry was Apple the first one? Not PCs, media devices or mobile phones, but successful in learning from the competition, and becoming relentless innovators. It’s hard for me to think of a first comer in any industry that’s still on top. If you’re not innovating, you’re gone.
lol aged well ... eth is hardly scaling ... cardaaanooo is bearish
3:29. If you ignore what Bitcoin is actually solving for, and you just look at this with your silicon valley hat that change is always good, then obviously the thing that changes the fastest is going to win. Despite the fact Bitcoin is preoccupied with the idea of personal sovereignty, which means rules but no rulers, and that quick change always implies centralization and central control. So Etherium has already failed. The goal here is not to build the same system we already have, just in cyberspace, it's to build an egalitarian system beyond the reach of overloads.
Charles says he doesn't understand the direction of Bitcoin, Lex points him in the direction, and Charles dismisses it. He's blinding himself from Bitcoin. He's ngmi
The problem with Charles is he doesn't understand Bitcoin.
I think he knows it better than most of us, and if he didn't, who would, Bill gates?
It's like telling a pharmacist, he doesn't know about medicine.
His critique is valid as he's a specialist in this field, and there would be other specialists who have differing opinions to his, and their opinions would be valid as well.
Lmao wtf. Charles defimitely understands bitcoin. Probably more than most of the average bitcoin holders.
@@NewMateo I'd say more than all average Bitcoin holders, because you used the word "average".
@@kha_2428 Philosophy must meet "Use and practicality" if you want it to exist and be adapted.
@@kha_2428 the limitations he mentioned are known, and other experts have used the same points he says are limitations to be actual advantages and what sets it apart from the alt coins.
So there's a bit of perspective here, but his opinion holds more weight than random people holding some coins in their wallet.
All due respect, academics wanting to 'evolve' Bitcoin again. While Core team tried it's hardest to NOT evolve it, thus creating a number of forks and L1s whose main marketing is 'evolved bitcoin'.
Btc fixes all the problems with current monetary policy. All your "solutions" are yet to be proven. I hold ADA and like the project but trying to make the case for it with such arguments is rather lame and frankly doesn't help the ecosystem as a whole.
I don't think you understand monetary policy.
Last I checked, bitcoin is far from mass adoption, and is therefore unproven, so what's your point?
@@TheMonkeygrunt yeah mate. And I bet you hold way too much ada and not enough btc. (I have both btw).
@@user-tu2dr3ny6x the bitcoin network has been working safely and truly decentralized for more than a decade. It hasn't been bridged and does what it is supposed to do. Thus, It's proven. Proof of stake hasn't been used yet in highly capitalized projects and personaly I think it raises a lot of questions regarding equitable access, security and decentralization in the future. We shall see.
Ahh yes all of the problems with fiat money being solved by a “currency” that’s value is decided in fiat money and exchanged for fiat money, traded in fiat money, and used as a way for people to get more fiat money. The honest person says it’s a way to transfer real money with less oversight or a way to get more real money. The problem Bitcoin solves for most is it gives them more fiat money to spend on something real when they sell it during a spike. A giant pyramid that makes people wealthy. Coming from a holder of multiple cryptos
Rule Nr 1 of crypto club: Never Bet Against Bitcoin
Rule Nr 2: Don't bet on it either.
Mainframes are not slow!
I should invest more in Bitcoin after hearing this
I love all the salt in the comments. Yet not one person made a single valid counter argument to anything Charles said. We should never let the price of ANY investment make us deaf to logic and truth.
Bitcoiners don't want to compromise the immutability of the base blockchain, why is that not valid?
Most Bitcoin “investors”, which are most of the whiners in the comments, have NO CLUE what that even means. And yes, that is a valid argument. As was a lot of what Charles pointed out about the flaws.
What if one day people just move to a different coin and people just get bored of Bitcoin? At least with Eth and Cardano their value derives from their use cases. Bitcoin's value is just ascribed from thin air at this point.
Bring on Gavin Wood!
There is a flaw to Charles argument - no loans in gold- people use USD for loans which floats enormously against their local currency, actually most developing countries are in this situation. The problem with gold is it’s not a bearer asset But BTC is, only 12 words are needed.
He HAS to trash any cryptocurrency other than Cardano.
Actually he has very good things to say about a lot of other crypto projects. Even ones in direct competition with Cardano, like Algorand.
@@GhostShooz Nah he kind of trashed it too. He respects it but he’s not a fan of it.
@@NoiseRoxx lol oh. I didn’t finish the whole 5 hours 😁. I just know in the past he said good things. But I guess if you designed a car you would talk yours up even above ones your peers made.
At 6:06, it clearly shows that Charles is clearly afraid of lightning network as it suppose to be.
Thanks for watching and leaving a comment.
You have been selected for my biggest cryptocurrency giveaway,,,WhatsApp me above👆👆👆
Bitcoin is the most important invention in the world since the invention of the internet.
This guy’s resume is epic
Bitcoin once scored 4 touchdowns in one game.
Hahahahha
Bitcoin is indestructible
Alts have fancy superpowers
I'll take indestructible thanks
The problem with btc, is the btc maxis,
What does it matter what coin you hold. Invest in what you believe in and allow others to do the same. Some of the comments below are so out there… Have a blessed day people
The problem with bitcoin is that anyone who has any is not us and we ain't having it