Quantum entanglement explained by Neil deGrasse Tyson with Joe Rogan

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 авг 2022
  • Neil deGrasse Tyson explains quantum entanglement to Joe Rogan.
    ---
    Future Here covers cutting edge science and technology including:
    Space exploration
    The NASA James Webb Telescope
    AI
    Data science
    Biotech
    Renewable Energy
    Solar power
    and other interesting future technology
    #science
    #technology
    ---
    Transcript:
    You've heard about quantum entangled particles?
    Yes.
    Where I can create a pair of particles that know about one another and that they're separated in space and in time.
    And if you observe that other particle,
    it instantly changes the state of the particle back.
    The other particle that's back where I am.
    And by the way, they communicate instantaneously,
    faster than the speed of light.
    When you say if you observe...
    but you have to do something.
    You have to do. You have to. Yes. So something has to interact with. It's not woo.
    The problem is the word observed people thinks is a is a psychological thing.
    But in physics, it's got nothing to do with...
    It's a measurement. It's a measurement thing. Right. And so, in other words, if we're measuring if there's a if there is an electron sitting in the middle of this table and all the lights are out, I can say I think there's an electron here. Let me find out. And the moment I turn on the lights, the light interacts, a photon interacts with the electron and kicks it somewhere else. So the more I try to measure its position, the less I know its position.
    Ooh!
    ---
    This video is under Fair Use:
    Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act in 1976; Allowance is made for "Fair Use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
    Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
    All rights and credit go directly to its rightful owners. No copyright infringement intended.
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 1 тыс.

  • @bryanmosende2569
    @bryanmosende2569 Год назад +2225

    Sometimes in the morning i like to drink coffee while i watch neil talk and i pretend like i understand it.

    • @josephchristopherdavissr.6804
      @josephchristopherdavissr.6804 Год назад +45

      I too like to drink and listen to Neil but it's more of an adult beverage.

    • @mjodreaper8481
      @mjodreaper8481 Год назад +25

      Photons from a light pushing an electron off a table is pretty easy to imagine. Imagine the light as a laser and the the electron as a balloon.

    • @billgalvin7177
      @billgalvin7177 Год назад +12

      @@mjodreaper8481 Mind blowing comment. 🤯

    • @gamer-tc6pf
      @gamer-tc6pf Год назад +10

      @@mjodreaper8481 I love how obvious it is that this kind of comment is written by someone who's understanding of physics come from high school and a couple youtube videos.

    • @gamergod9377
      @gamergod9377 Год назад +6

      @@gamer-tc6pf state your education level please

  • @jeffreycarrasquillo3102
    @jeffreycarrasquillo3102 Год назад +2027

    DeGrass Tyson- “You heard about quantum entangled particles?” Rogan -“Yeah.” LOL

    • @blobbydigital5610
      @blobbydigital5610 Год назад +149

      It would’ve been hilarious if Neil asked Joe to explain it to his audience

    • @jamesragsdale6460
      @jamesragsdale6460 Год назад +46

      I don't think of myself as a smart dude or anything and I've heard of it bro 😁

    • @carnaldesire
      @carnaldesire Год назад +14

      Might've been from Ant Man lol

    • @iissss9847
      @iissss9847 Год назад +3

      @@blobbydigital5610 no 🤣

    • @neviosh
      @neviosh Год назад +11

      yeah, from his last dmt trip

  • @aathilaliyar2724
    @aathilaliyar2724 Год назад +265

    I like how Neil gave a simplified example for Heisenberg's uncertainty principle without actually saying it's the Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.

    • @calicoesblue4703
      @calicoesblue4703 Год назад +6

      Well, it’s actually more than just that🤷

    • @mirowestmaas4566
      @mirowestmaas4566 Год назад +6

      Right? I can't explain any better but Neil's explanation sounded very simplified to me.

    • @sharyararyan
      @sharyararyan Год назад +20

      Not only that, he kinda explained all three interrelated theories of the Uncertainty Principle, Copenhagen Interpretation & Schrodinger's cat. All three of them are based on uncertainty.

    • @abysssun4979
      @abysssun4979 3 месяца назад +4

      because it isn’t heisenberg’s uncertainty principle.

    • @lotusphoenix8
      @lotusphoenix8 3 месяца назад

      ​@@abysssun4979 Indeed it isn't

  • @josephtalley8856
    @josephtalley8856 Год назад +766

    That's how I feel when trying to pin point the floatie thing in front of my eye ball.

    • @TSN1969
      @TSN1969 Год назад +15

      My doppelgänger 👍

    • @dustinnukem5458
      @dustinnukem5458 Год назад +17

      @@TSN1969 no way. I haven't thought about it in years. Ha ha

    • @fredcesena2884
      @fredcesena2884 Год назад +28

      Ocular entanglement!

    • @A2theStil
      @A2theStil Год назад +8

      😂😂😂😂 dead said that to myself too 😂 I used the floaty thing to explain this to my non science friends

    • @MextizaCalifa
      @MextizaCalifa Год назад

      Yeees

  • @cockneyb2k
    @cockneyb2k Год назад +327

    Sounds like my pay from work. The moment I look at it,it instantly disappears.

  • @Freakoticbbx
    @Freakoticbbx Год назад +178

    Quantum entanglement is what Jada Smith calls a really small affair.

  • @fryloc359
    @fryloc359 Год назад +286

    "No fair! You changed the outcome by measuring it!" - Professor Farnsworth

    • @liyans1
      @liyans1 Год назад +14

      This comment gave me feelings.

    • @RikJSmith
      @RikJSmith Год назад +3

      @@liyans1 LoL !!!

    • @DayTukErrJawbs
      @DayTukErrJawbs Год назад +8

      Yea I miss Futurama...

    • @Angel_m7
      @Angel_m7 Год назад +1

      @@DayTukErrJawbsnew season out next week

  • @jogo-md8jq
    @jogo-md8jq Год назад +31

    Exactly! In quantum physics, measurement is no longer passive action, it's an active action that can and will effect the particle you're looking at

    • @WhatWouldVillainsDo
      @WhatWouldVillainsDo 11 месяцев назад +4

      Kinda similar to reading blood pressure they know for a fact that unless you have a massive amount of self control just them doing a reading changes your BP.

  • @Greenwood13
    @Greenwood13 Год назад +55

    Dirac's Equation or The Love Equation
    The concept contained in the equation is that: “If two systems interact with each other for a certain period of time and are then separated, they can no longer be defined as two distinct systems, but become a single system.”

    • @audiophile75
      @audiophile75 Год назад +2

      THANK YOU, THANK YOU SOOOO MUCH!!!
      For so many years I've been having to listen to assholes like Michio Kaku try to spin some relevance into their pathetic lifes by making it seem like science has elements of mysticism or magic. It doesn't....... whats more, it doesn't have to, this stunningly amazing universe that we're lucky enough to find ourselves in is beautiful enough all by herself

    • @twitter.comelomhycy
      @twitter.comelomhycy Год назад +3

      Is it called the love equation because whenever you meet someone, your destinies are forever intertwined with each other?

    • @alessandroc.4543
      @alessandroc.4543 Год назад +1

      This is false. Why do you say random stuff in the internet?

    • @S-tank_
      @S-tank_ Месяц назад

      Y'all sound smart and I'm not. I want to ask a question might be silly but I want to know lol. If I can turn the direction of one electron and the other one instantly changes, wouldn't that be like unlimited energy? If I get the output of 2 turning when I only put in the energy it takes to turn one, doesn't that violate that thermodynamic law where I can't get out more than I put in? If that's wrong (I'm sure it is lol) I would like to know how

    • @haydenblanford4272
      @haydenblanford4272 Месяц назад

      @@S-tank_look up zero point energy, I think you’re on the right track

  • @mikebar42
    @mikebar42 Год назад +590

    When you go to measure your junk but it disappears

    • @kehsaem
      @kehsaem Год назад +16

      Well done 😂

    • @XX32XX622
      @XX32XX622 Год назад +9

      Or it hasn't stopped growing lol 🙃

    • @mikebar42
      @mikebar42 Год назад +15

      @@XX32XX622 that's spooky action at a distance

    • @Ehtas22420
      @Ehtas22420 Год назад

      🤣🤣

    • @mikebar42
      @mikebar42 Год назад +2

      @@Ehtas22420 it's all relative

  • @easyethanol6611
    @easyethanol6611 Год назад +14

    That's the first time I've ever heard a good explanation of how observing affects particles

    • @twitter.comelomhycy
      @twitter.comelomhycy Год назад +2

      Cool

    • @calicoesblue4703
      @calicoesblue4703 Год назад +3

      Well it’s not really observing, if you were to try & take a measurement so that you can observe it, it changes its state immediately so that you would actually be observing something entirely different than what you intended to observe.

    • @tommygun6559
      @tommygun6559 2 месяца назад +1

      @@calicoesblue4703it’s called the “observation theory”

  • @mhmm3218
    @mhmm3218 Год назад +154

    Crazy, once you find it you actually don’t. And the more you look for it the more inaccurate the location of it is

    • @marvinreyes4273
      @marvinreyes4273 Год назад +20

      My love story

    • @kehsaem
      @kehsaem Год назад +3

      @@marvinreyes4273 😂

    • @BlueFalcon235
      @BlueFalcon235 Год назад +4

      The game of hide and seek. Most choose to seek rather than hide. Just like the game, you have to want to be found. This is the principle of manifestation.

    • @bofetada6841
      @bofetada6841 Год назад

      Sounds like the Tao....always infringeing upon religion is this guy

    • @goldfishy
      @goldfishy Год назад +2

      So you’ll find it where you least expect it, just don’t go looking for it.

  • @isthattrue1083
    @isthattrue1083 Год назад +7

    It's because it's connected in the 4th spatial dimension. So it can travel faster than light because it exists at all points of time at the same time. It's hard to comprehend because it is entirely outside our ability to perceive it.

    • @StrawmnMcPerson
      @StrawmnMcPerson 3 месяца назад +2

      "Entirely out of our capability" pfftsh speak for yourself

  • @teancoffee208
    @teancoffee208 Год назад +36

    "Its not 'woo'" summarizes Joe Rogans process of thought perfectly

  • @barondavisiscool
    @barondavisiscool Год назад +12

    That's a great and simple way to explain why it's so hard to "see" certain particles

    • @vrajeshpc
      @vrajeshpc Год назад +2

      That is also Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, in case anyone wants more detail on it

  • @WoFDarkNewton
    @WoFDarkNewton Год назад +2

    “The problem is that people think the word observe is a psychological thing. But in physics, it’s a measurement”
    Yeah, that’s because scientists picked the wrong word to describe what they mean. If everyone thinks your word means something, it does.

  • @nickmanning3702
    @nickmanning3702 Год назад +15

    This is why, every time we remember something it will be different than how we remembered it last.

  • @hwoods01
    @hwoods01 Год назад +5

    The best discription of the Heisenberg's uncertainty principle I've ever heard.

  • @eredaane4656
    @eredaane4656 Год назад +3

    People who do not know anything about quantum mechanics/ physics/ chemistry, they think if "observe" as "to see something". The problem with that is, these particles are way to small for us to see them, so we prove their existence by interacting with them, and since we can interact with them, they must exist and from that interaction we can gain information about for example their size, "charge", speed OR position. That is an "observation" and the reason why, whenever we try to observe quantum mechanical particles such as electrons, they become more and more difficult to describe "unscharf" (ger.). By observing them, we make the informaiton we gained a thing of the past, since its already changed because we observed it.

    • @eredaane4656
      @eredaane4656 Год назад

      this is the best i can do without going into qm-theory and in english

  • @jameseze9469
    @jameseze9469 Год назад +10

    Whenever I tried to approach my crush, I just couldn't. So that's quantum mechanics!

  • @radofnf
    @radofnf Год назад +10

    The reaction was gold🤣

  • @jacquesschaerer323
    @jacquesschaerer323 Год назад +5

    I now know what “observe” means. It’s all makes sense now.

  • @nexusinc.4367
    @nexusinc.4367 Год назад +3

    Quantum entangled particles are important for space travel because they allow for instant communication over any distance. They would be amazing for online gaming as well with almost no latency

  • @peterwilliams1119
    @peterwilliams1119 Год назад +15

    Imagine being so weak you're knocked out by a photon.

    • @lysandertavish1684
      @lysandertavish1684 Год назад +6

      Jimmy pull up a picture of electron diets

    • @royloh569
      @royloh569 Год назад +1

      @@lysandertavish1684 Electron 'bout to get some massive quark gains

    • @twitter.comelomhycy
      @twitter.comelomhycy Год назад

      LOL perfectly describes leftists these days . . .

  • @johnnypottseed
    @johnnypottseed Год назад +7

    These are eventually going to enable instantaneous communication across stellar distances. We just have to learn more.

    • @csgogamer1826
      @csgogamer1826 Год назад +1

      Yup 100%.

    • @jennyhenry387
      @jennyhenry387 Год назад +1

      Amazing! That was my thought while he was speaking. Instant, interference-free communication across vast distances.

    • @StrawmnMcPerson
      @StrawmnMcPerson 3 месяца назад

      Nah, we just have to not go extinct first. Until oil and gas industries are gone and billionaires and governments stop starving us to d3ath en masse, there's very clearly no point in tackling a currently non-existent problem.

    • @empyrean196
      @empyrean196 24 дня назад

      Yeah. But quantum physics is very subtle, and nonlocal in functioning. We’ll have to design tech for manipulating bits of energy in superposition.

  • @sibusiso2841
    @sibusiso2841 Год назад +6

    Me looking for something I was holding 2 seconds ago

  • @dannydonnelly8345
    @dannydonnelly8345 Год назад +5

    You've heard of quantum entangled particles? Joe Rogan: YES

    • @MossyMozart
      @MossyMozart 4 месяца назад

      Rather uncertainly principled, though.

  • @manishkhadka129
    @manishkhadka129 6 месяцев назад +2

    Einstien: Light has no mass
    Quantum physics: Hold my electron.

  • @pedroclaro7822
    @pedroclaro7822 Год назад +12

    The beauty of quantum entanglement is that some particles become linked somehow, and we may not know it or be able to see it, but they communicate and affect each other. We are made of particles and so we are all linked, somehow, and sometimes we feel unexplainably attracted to a place, or a person or a thing.

    • @jazzman1904
      @jazzman1904 Год назад +1

      I believe that scientists are able to use this effect to instantly communicate information. For instance a receiver on Mars or even on a space ship thousands of light years away can provide instant communication.

    • @alessandroc.4543
      @alessandroc.4543 Год назад +1

      All you said is wrong, I'm sorry

    • @tajs476
      @tajs476 2 месяца назад

      I think it's more accurate to think of quantum entanglement as 2 particles becoming one or behaving as one instead of becoming 2 particles that are linked to eachother but remain separate. It is known as quantum nonlocality I believe

    • @pedroclaro7822
      @pedroclaro7822 2 месяца назад +1

      @@alessandroc.4543 don’t be sorry. I’m glad to be proven wrong, as I can learn from it and grow. As I came back to this I laughed at myself

  • @TifleTifle-xd2pf
    @TifleTifle-xd2pf Год назад +13

    Adds new meaning to, “sending thoughts and prayers your way.”

  • @059echo
    @059echo 7 месяцев назад +1

    He's describing Santa Claus in quantum lingo

  • @mandavaler
    @mandavaler Год назад +1

    I believe if we can fully flesh out our understanding of quantum entanglement we will be able to teleport instantly across the cosmos with no time loss and communications will have no range limit.

  • @JIMMYBUSHIDO
    @JIMMYBUSHIDO Год назад +16

    That makes sense 🤔

    • @kontrolleti7189
      @kontrolleti7189 Год назад

      @murphy just because you dont understand doesn't mean it doesn't make sense

    • @RikJSmith
      @RikJSmith Год назад

      @murphy I understand how it doesn't make sense.

  • @norwegiandude9272
    @norwegiandude9272 Год назад +5

    Finally someone who explained it well. It’s about the delicate interaction between elementary particles. It’s the measurement. By doing a measurement you adding energy to the experiment. Not the misleading word “observer”, that lead someone to think about the human mind influence/consciousness.

    • @kuriousQing21
      @kuriousQing21 Год назад

      Bro the act of measurement is literally the act of observance. You cannot measure without observing. And who is measuring?? The human consciousness- AN OBSERVER. How are these two concepts so difficult to grasp in their unity is so mind boggling to me. People will doANYTHINg to separate spirituality of our consciousness with scientific quest that they forget the entire universe is first and foremost spiritual. It is literally magic. Have you seen how crazy it is up there? How did we even get here? Why are we here? The very question of the “why” is phenomenally magical. If you can’t unify the two then you are looking at one side of the coin and calling it the only side when you KNOW coins have two sides.
      Measurement IS observation. You CANNOT measure without looking at the damn thing first. Looking at it and expecting some kind of probable outcome IS the act of trying to measure it. Switching on the light in the room to see where tf the election is, IS observing it. You cannot observe in the dark can you? The only way to observe is to LOOK AT IT. You can only look at it when you create some circumstance like switching on the light to observe it.

  • @lbrufio7092
    @lbrufio7092 Год назад +9

    I love the moments when my deep brain goes oh yeah I get it, and then the other 99% of my brain goes w*f did he just say

  • @JO-mg6xc
    @JO-mg6xc 3 месяца назад +2

    He mixed entangled particles with Heisenberg uncertainty principle, which has NOTHING to do on how to measure the position. It has to do with the intrinsic impossibility to measure anything with 100% certainty ( the operation is not commutative). Not because of the instruments, but due to a natural limit.

  • @greggsworld4453
    @greggsworld4453 Год назад +6

    I feel like soul mates are quantum entanglement. There’s an indescribable bond that you cannot explain.

  • @navibamrah5681
    @navibamrah5681 Год назад +4

    Heisenbergs uncertainty principle

  • @Locreai
    @Locreai Год назад +1

    Instant transmission of your favorite advertisements from any station in the universe

  • @Cannedbeef
    @Cannedbeef Год назад +3

    Imagine if this is how enlightenment works. 2 particles that know something, you do something and the other instantly switches something onto your head and boom

  • @zemoyellow5943
    @zemoyellow5943 Год назад +23

    Thank you for making me feel stupid

  • @RicardoPicena
    @RicardoPicena Год назад +30

    Tyson- “ you heard bout quantum entanglement particles?”
    Jada - “yea”

  • @GWOAT
    @GWOAT Год назад +1

    As a kid I perfected my hide n seek strategy from an electron

  • @wischmopps293
    @wischmopps293 Год назад +1

    No. It doesn't change. You just know the state of particle a, when you know the state of particle b.. That's a big difference

  • @slk8674
    @slk8674 Год назад +6

    I just wanted to know if you saw where I left my keys, Neil..

  • @rhiys
    @rhiys Год назад +3

    For those wondering.
    When you are about to call someone and they call you first?
    When you're thinking of someone randomly and they all of a sudden contact you?
    Some people believe that is quantum entanglement, or 'soul mate'. Eternally connected and one directly effecting the other.

    • @zachgordon99
      @zachgordon99 Год назад

      Thank you for the explanation/translation ❤️

    • @Ivan.Wright
      @Ivan.Wright Год назад

      Ya, but guys like Neal won't be talking about that for a long time.
      I feel so many never apply their theories to their lived reality. "It's just a coincidence if it's outside the lab" kinda cognitive dissonance

  • @silveribis55
    @silveribis55 Год назад +2

    Firstly: the particles have had to interact with each other first , then can be separated by any distance, supposedly! Secondly: when you do observe (take readings of) one of the particles, it's 'entangled partner', wherever it may be, surely would be opposite!
    Particles have what we call states....and what state or it's character such as spin, charge...so when you measure or observe one, and it has say an upspin position the other one surely will be downspin. So it's not like the particles are communicating as such, it's just that one will be opposite to what the other one will be.
    Then goes on to speak of particles being somewhere then when observed they move or disappear 🙄...he's talking about not being able to pinpoint exactly where every particle is in the famous double slit experiment (can look it up) and instead it's only the most probable area percentage of where it may land....and turns out it does a wave function...so that's how we know they can be both a particle and a wave at the same time. 😉

    • @huzaifasajid6830
      @huzaifasajid6830 Год назад +1

      I agree with your first point. I too am unable to understand what's so fascinating about quantum entanglement. Can it not be that the information is stored in the particles when they first interact and later on, when you read one, you know the state of the other.
      Secondly, I think he suddenly switched to hiesenberg's uncertainty principle about measuring the position or the momentum of a particle. I dont know how or why that information was necessary for explaining quantum entanglement.

    • @csgogamer1826
      @csgogamer1826 Год назад

      @@huzaifasajid6830 i think he mentioned the uncertainty principle in order to really demonstrate how unpredictable and random these things are. Making the fact we can know the state of entangled particles across theoretically ∞ distance that much more shocking and interesting.

    • @csgogamer1826
      @csgogamer1826 Год назад

      I like the explanation, only thing I’d suggest to add is throw in the term superposition when mentioning the initial interaction between particles.

    • @silveribis55
      @silveribis55 Год назад

      @@huzaifasajid6830 yeah it was a bit mixed up. Niel is a nice guy and he has some insight but I just don't quite know what his main field of expertise is...think it's astronomy...but I do get a bit confused with some of his explanations ...or he isn't sure but continues on. Either way some specialists in the field of particles and quantum physics always say, once you think you understand it, you don't know quantum physics 😄...which I think is so true.

  • @oneworldonecrew7433
    @oneworldonecrew7433 Год назад +1

    He just explained humanity...to put it bluntly.

  • @Abby_Normal_1969
    @Abby_Normal_1969 Год назад +8

    I heard about this a while back. I am totally freaked out by this.

    • @lunahri4173
      @lunahri4173 Год назад

      A good way to imagine it (i believe i read it in one of brian greene’s books) is:
      Let’s say you try to observe a fly, first you attempt to measure it’s position in your room. The more precisely you know it’s position, for example with an extremely good camera, the more the fly will look static. You know the exact position, but it seems not to move, therefore you cannot know it’s speed at the same time. It looks frozen = 0 speed.
      Now you do another observation, focusing on it’s speed. The more accurately you measure it’s speed, the less you can tell where it actually is since everything around it will be blurry.
      That’s one way to explain this principle, hope it helps :)

    • @Abby_Normal_1969
      @Abby_Normal_1969 Год назад +2

      @@lunahri4173 - thanks for the explanation. It is not that I don't get it at a fundamental level. The mechanism through how particles become entangled, i can't begin to fathom. What weirds me out is how two particles connect by what ever force allows the spin, they can be separated by space and time and still subject to the effects on each other. Totally weird. The theory as I understand it predicts that the entanglement is instantaneous through space time, right? So this force isn't just faster than light, it is infinitely faster than light. Like a particles can reach 13 billion years into the future or across 13 billion light-years of space to affect the spin of its entangled partner. What is up with that?

  • @Mikey_Moonshine
    @Mikey_Moonshine Год назад +4

    This kinda explains dreams for me.. my whole life I've had very vivid and crazy dreams and I forget some but so many I can remember vivid details even when they make no sense to my mind when I wake up but in the dream I'm reasoning between two trains of thought...one with more feelings (in the dream) and one in more logic (being conscious)...I have a lot of dreams where they feel like they are in a different space and time kinda... sometimes in an ancient future... sometimes in alternate past or realms that sometimes go back and forth with one another, because the world and people there understand time space and existence...and I'm just stuck there witnessing it just like I am here even if I can control some aspects there is still some kinds of laws ...but always different somehow.. in some dreams im telling my brother I feel like I came back in time in a different timeline through my dreams and he's like the only who understands that ..there and here ...he's open minded like I am but dreams I think are part of an observation point... Then when you dream you are measuring those particles in another space and time... That's what just hit me when I heard this..maybe other chemicals in the body and spiritual chemicals folks use also do the same... 🤔 Who really knows for sure ...? Some things you can just feel even when they make hardly any sense..not to say it's wrong just to say it feels right instead of the other way around...I'm learning that feeling doesn't always make things real in an actuality standpoint but it helps motivate an individual nonetheless... Lol 😂🤷🏽‍♂️🙆🏽‍♂️🙅🏽‍♂️..who else has super wicked dreams that have stuck with them and become actual memories you remember when you woke up and still can remember..wether it was today yesterday ten years ago... I'm obsessed with dreams and how you can recognize people you've never met... Maybe we connect that way too it's insane to think cuz it's limitless in idea... ✌🏽😎😴😪🤤💤

    • @cyber1ifeconnor
      @cyber1ifeconnor Год назад

      thats literally your left and right brain talking/clashing... ADHD helps make overactive brains.

    • @csgogamer1826
      @csgogamer1826 Год назад

      @@cyber1ifeconnor interesting theory, but don’t act like it’s fact. Good guess lol

    • @StrawmnMcPerson
      @StrawmnMcPerson 3 месяца назад

      ​@@cyber1ifeconnorOveractive or under-stimulated? Our ancestors used to have the time to study the stars so hard we can now predict their movements with to-the-minute accuracy. We had time to think up machines so sophisticated we don't even understand how they work anymore with all our tech of today, to hyperfocus so hard we built multiple astrological systems with nothing but the stars and some hand tools. We're under-stimulated. Nay, under-thebootofcapitalism.

  • @blackibis6135
    @blackibis6135 11 дней назад

    I'm most thoroughly impressed by the fact that Joe was able to not only interrupt NDT, but get him to acknowledge this was a conversation.

  • @tanuj2200
    @tanuj2200 Год назад +1

    What crazy is that they teach this in class 11 it's Heisenberg Uncertainty principle well not quantum entanglement but the electron part

    • @virno69420
      @virno69420 Год назад

      No that's not the uncertainty principle, he just made it up.

  • @speedytort7384
    @speedytort7384 Год назад +4

    Man i was searching for this comment, i laughed so hard when he said yes so instantly

  • @klocke5247
    @klocke5247 Год назад +4

    Tyson just barely understands any of this.

  • @seanspartan2023
    @seanspartan2023 Год назад +1

    The instantaneous communication is what bothered Einstein, and is still debated to this day.

  • @Tornado2409
    @Tornado2409 7 месяцев назад +1

    "The electron knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By colliding with a photon, or not colliding with a photon, whichever seems to happen, it obtains a difference or deviation."

  • @joyboy9196
    @joyboy9196 Год назад +3

    I thought they were gonna bring will Smith in

    • @nandansho
      @nandansho Год назад

      Wow you actually heard the word entangled and associated it with Will Smith....So you watch TV...You failed at humor and in life.

  • @Mrnatox
    @Mrnatox Год назад +7

    Tyson startin one topic, ending in another... I luv token scientists

  • @johnroszel8470
    @johnroszel8470 Год назад +1

    He talks about this as if it's a thing. "I can create a pair of particles that know about one another, separated by space and time..."
    It's a theory. That cannot be measured... therefore not observed.

    • @jay70328
      @jay70328 Год назад

      And yet it has been measured, and therefore observed.

  • @radtrad1401
    @radtrad1401 9 месяцев назад

    Measurement is a psychological thing because it is the act of being consciously aware of a quantity

  • @Biobele
    @Biobele Год назад +5

    Well it’s like some humans on TV. You know the camera crew is here so you act nicer, dress better and smile brighter.

  • @ungabunga6735
    @ungabunga6735 Год назад +5

    My brain trying to understand this: 🥴🥴🥴

  • @zakaruahbones3142
    @zakaruahbones3142 Год назад

    Heisenbergs uncertainty principle is a fundamental problem with measuring. We currently cannot measure subatomic particles without altering the state of the particle.

  • @bestmindcoolingrelaxationm1084
    @bestmindcoolingrelaxationm1084 26 дней назад

    Guys something's wrong here, he's basically saying electrons are kicked away by photons when we switch light on that's why we're unable to measure.
    But it also means that always electrons are kicked away by light even if no one's measuring it.
    So no measurement is needed
    Someone explain to me if I'm wrong

  • @attackpatterndelta8949
    @attackpatterndelta8949 Год назад +5

    “You’ve heard of quantum entangled particles?”
    “Yeah”
    You big fat liar Joe Rogan.

    • @csgogamer1826
      @csgogamer1826 Год назад +1

      He’s a grown ass man who has really smart individuals on his podcast nearly daily. It’s not surprising he’s heard of them at all.

  • @vaibhavk2400
    @vaibhavk2400 Год назад +2

    Yeah but I wish a real physicist would communicate instead of popularise stuff. As a physicist I want public to know how beautiful this is but not everything is entanglement and “black holes”.

  • @EinsamPibroch278
    @EinsamPibroch278 Год назад +1

    As much as I love Scientific pursuits, I can't take Quantum Entanglement seriously.

  • @rolandorodriguez9625
    @rolandorodriguez9625 6 месяцев назад

    How can nobody here is mind-blown by the fact that a particle can affect another particle separated by space and time. That's sci-fi stuff, almost paranormal stuff being discovered.

  • @bhakti235
    @bhakti235 Год назад +1

    They don’t communicate, they are part of the same system

  • @SLURM187
    @SLURM187 Год назад +1

    “You’ve heard of quantum entangled particles?”
    Joe Rogan:………..Yes

  • @confusedcaveman6611
    @confusedcaveman6611 Год назад +1

    This reminds me of the double slit experiment

  • @robinmitchell6803
    @robinmitchell6803 Год назад

    Saying that it communicated is somewhat wrong. Instead it’s that both particles already have a state when together and retain that state when separated. This is why you couldn’t use this for FTL communication

  • @09spidy
    @09spidy Год назад +1

    I learned about quantum entanglement from Mass Effect 2.

  • @livinginPantopia
    @livinginPantopia Год назад +1

    This is the story of Orpheus and Eurydice. Apollo gave his son Orpheus a lyre and taught him how to play. It had been said that "nothing could resist Orpheus's beautiful melodies, neither enemies nor beasts." Orpheus fell in love with Eurydice, a woman of beauty and grace, whom he married and lived with happily for a short time. However, when Hymen was called to bless the marriage, he predicted that their perfection was not meant to last.
    A short time after this prophecy, Eurydice was wandering in the forest with the Nymphs. In some versions of the story, the shepherd Aristaeus saw her, and beguiled by her beauty, made advances towards her and began to chase her. Other versions of the story relate that Eurydice was merely dancing with the Nymphs. While fleeing or dancing, she was bitten by a snake and died instantly. Orpheus sung his grief with his lyre and managed to move everything, living or not, in the world; both humans and gods learnt about his sorrow and grief.
    At some point, Orpheus decided to descend to Hades to see his wife. Any other mortal would have died, but Orpheus, being protected by the gods, went to Hades and arrived at the Stygian realm, passing by ghosts and souls of people unknown. He also managed to attract Cerberus, the three-headed dog, with a liking for his music. He presented himself in front of the god of the Greek underworld, Hades and his wife, Persephone.
    Orpheus played his lyre, attracting Hades. Hades told Orpheus that he could take Eurydice back with him but under one condition: she would have to follow behind him while walking out from the caves of the underworld, and he could not turn to look at her as they walked.
    Thinking it a simple task for a patient man like himself, Orpheus was delighted; he thanked the gods and left to ascend back into the living world. Unable to hear Eurydice's footsteps, however, he began to fear the gods had fooled him. Eurydice might have been behind him, but as a shade, having to come back into the light to become a full woman again. Only a few feet away from the exit, Orpheus lost his faith and turned to see Eurydice behind him, sending her back to be trapped with Hades forever.

  • @williammorrissey9661
    @williammorrissey9661 8 месяцев назад

    First, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle: You are in the dark, in the basement. Concrete floor. Empty except for one billiard ball somewhere on the floor. You have to find the billiard ball's location. You can't turn on the lights. Your only method of detection is to roll another billiard on the floor and listen for a collision with the original ball. IF you hear a collision, you know where the original ball WAS located, but now it has a new speed and direction, and a new location. You can't know BOTH a particle's position, AND momentum at the same time.
    Second. The entanglement part means that if you change the spin of one electron in a pair, the other electron will change instantaneously; even is they are thousands of miles apart. The information that makes them change spin "travels" instantaneously--faster than light can travel.

  • @antmanandthecod6073
    @antmanandthecod6073 Год назад +1

    How do they know it interacts with the other particle because they would have to observe the other particle which has then changed its state because it’s been measured

  • @99Gara99
    @99Gara99 3 месяца назад

    NGY: "You've heard about quantum entengled particles"
    Joe Rogan: "Yes 🧐"

  • @small_dropin_the_big_ocean995
    @small_dropin_the_big_ocean995 Год назад

    He is talking about Heisenberg Uncertainity Principle in later half of this video. When I read it in my high school physics book, I was surprised how little we are in control of the task of "observing a little electron accurately and realistically". We affect the events or objects around us at the mere act of observation at microscopic level. We can never observe the particle without affecting it.

    • @vanillaglue
      @vanillaglue Год назад

      Observation = interaction. Not just merely looking at it with our eyes as conscious observers.

    • @small_dropin_the_big_ocean995
      @small_dropin_the_big_ocean995 Год назад

      @@vanillaglue Where did I say it's not?

  • @bofetada6841
    @bofetada6841 Год назад +2

    This seems like an impossible thing to observe based on everything he said.

  • @itsROMPERS...
    @itsROMPERS... Год назад

    Entangled particles can be separated by space, but they aren't separated by time, NDT is wrong.
    They are in the same time, otherwise they wouldn't be entangled, entanglement is by definition a simultaneous relationship.

  • @opluxna2120
    @opluxna2120 Год назад +1

    That's why you've gotta measure where it isn't to know where it is. Missile logic

  • @davez4285
    @davez4285 2 месяца назад

    It’s hypothetical.There’s no way you can measure one to know the other in light years away instantaneously.
    I think at best two entangled particles having super synchronization. So you measure one, you can assume the other instantaneously, because there are SYNCHRONIZED not ENTANGLED.
    There is no mechanism that one particle can control the other, and vice versa.

  • @JenniferZerbe
    @JenniferZerbe 3 месяца назад

    It's the same as the instant i understand is simultaneously instantaneously when I don't.

  • @DeVoN420zz
    @DeVoN420zz 6 месяцев назад

    I think entanglement is a primary feature of quantum mechanics not present in classical mechanics the particles are spinning both directions and the act of observing it changes its current state

  • @9livesspent339
    @9livesspent339 Год назад

    I am no scientist but their is logic. If becoming aware of a particle alters it that would at a minimum imply a connection between those particles. Which implies we are probably more connected then we’d like to Imagine.

  • @michaelhammond4065
    @michaelhammond4065 Год назад +1

    Hey,I actually get the idea now. This is the best I've heard it explained

  • @Mikyda3
    @Mikyda3 Год назад

    That ooh at the end. 😆

  • @GRDwashere
    @GRDwashere 5 месяцев назад

    "Jamie, pull up that video of the quantum entangled bears'''"

  • @MrJeffrey938
    @MrJeffrey938 Год назад

    That last bit though!

  • @medhabalaji
    @medhabalaji Год назад

    This is literally just Heisenberg's principle where you can at a time only know for certain a particle's momentum or position. It can't both be determined for the same instant of time.

  • @abinashborah8524
    @abinashborah8524 Месяц назад

    The video felt incomplete. He was explaining Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.

  • @agustinoliveros38
    @agustinoliveros38 Год назад

    That particle Was here just now

  • @vonthehomie
    @vonthehomie Год назад +1

    Heisenberg uncertainty at the end

  • @StrawmnMcPerson
    @StrawmnMcPerson 3 месяца назад

    "Once you label me, you negate me." -Søren Kierkegaard

  • @raiderjohnthemadbomber8666
    @raiderjohnthemadbomber8666 Год назад +1

    Brava Professor! You put quantum physics on an elementary level. Well done, sir!

  • @TC38Cole
    @TC38Cole Год назад

    Lynne McTaggart covered this (and several other fascinating science things) in The Intention Experiment.

  • @kyle3465
    @kyle3465 7 месяцев назад

    *explains quantum entanglement*
    Me having even less understanding and more questions: 👁️👄👁️

  • @barisibis8778
    @barisibis8778 5 месяцев назад +1

    Heisenberg's uncertainty principle...

  • @EvoArtsLLC
    @EvoArtsLLC 24 дня назад

    I can entangle through correlation any objects, it's easiest shown with playing cards

  • @georgewilliamsiii4677
    @georgewilliamsiii4677 Год назад +1

    We are so close to having an ansible. Like in Enders game series lol
    Let's go Outside and Back and we will manage teleportation lol