It is a path breaking speech by Shree J Sai Deepak and is an eye opener to all open minded educated people of the country who respect the Judiciary and also expect it to perform its designated role. The whole country is suffering from the combined effect of non performance of Executives, Legislature and of the Judicial activism. One of the very important and valid reasons of piling up of pending cases before the various courts of this country may be this. Every sensitive and open minded citizen of this country would sincerely expect all these very very important arms of the State to function properly and to discharge their designated duties effectively. And hence, this speech of Shree J Sai Deepak is very very timely and should reach to maximum number of people for mass awareness and to create a mass appeal in this regard.
I’m not sure why Modi government doesn’t hire him as a consultant for the Ministry of Law? He has a great insight into the functioning of the judiciary system.
NJAC was a pathetic bill, jaitley would obviously say as govtlost power to their pawns as judges. The current collegium ensures thatno stooge of govt gets into judiciary, so that impartiality is maintained
Never seen anyone who publicly spoke reality of higher level judiciary power,it's abuse ......interference by government.....and consequences of judicial activism on common man and it's solutions....wow great,❤️........I think in reality through hard and intelligent, long efforts (even with sufferings,now and then by many) by group of men can bring changes in system of nation
Very good speech. He never disappoints. Very very clear in communication. A glance at the previous appointments of CJIs shows that the existing collegium ensures dynastic supercession. Why to blame the GOP of India. That may be one of the reasons these judges don't want NJC. Sad.
I have written against the SC Judges which was published in Organiser issue dated 17 July 22. Am anxiously waiting for contempt of court proceeding against me so that I would get a golden opportunity to make my main contentions a worldwide issue.
You are a brave man! May be with a streak of masochism(?). in fact I am surprised, JSDhasn't been thrown that Contempt of Court Brahmastra by the judges already!
This is one of the most comprehensive and down to earth talks on the evils of judicial activism and its causes. No intellectual posturing. Only facts. I have noticed that the Supreme Court started encroaching upon the territory of judiciary from early 1990s, when the era of co-alition governments started. That was when the Second Judges's transfer judgment was delivered vesting the power of appointment of judges in the Judiciary. A strong government would have prevented this occurrance. It is good that the present government has recently demanded its representation in the collegium. Otherwise, it will continue to be a club of favouring the cronies. During the last thirty years, the weakness of the Executive and the Parliament has let the judiciary rule the roost. With 50% of the parliamentarins having criminal cases against them, and the corruption in bureaucray and State politics being legion, little wonder that the Legislautre and the executive lack the moral authority to re-assert their true role in the constitutional framework.
JSD is very articulate in expression of the thoughts without any iota of confusion within himself and giving no chance of any statement of his to be taken back. Very versatile and the Audience gets educated on the Grammar, Subject, Skill Development, Leadership Qualities etc
Every single line is a fact and, you cornered the true problem with facts that we can't realise in day to day life. Good analysis and thankyou for letting us to the world through your eye, now you are not alone.😊 My sense of respect is active with full potential.
Wow! This the first time I am coming across the answer to my old and repeated question that I had been asking as to who and how are the judges, especially SC judges, are selected and appointed!!! And of course, who else than J. Say Deepak is the only one saying the 'simple' provision in the constitution. Well done, Shrimaan. Why has there been no opposition, resistance, counter efforts in and out of Parliament by the BJP government to assert itself to correct this situation? A constitution that ignores the whole elected Parliament in choosing and appointing judges - SC judges, especially - is a flawed constitution! Is this why Mr. Modi and his cabinet and whole BJP remain silent? The CJI seems to operate and makes not only legal pronouncements about the cases in front of his bench, he freely and improperly makes many personal statements, comments, denigration including threats of "Contempt of Court" weapon at anybody that criticizes him or the court! He essentially is behaving as the Viceroy 2.0 with assumption of absolute power. This is insane. The court(s) have been usurping the power of the elected parliament and issue "Fatwas" with threats even to the PMO and its cabinet. Who is going to "bell the cat"? And with history of targeng all Hindu traditions, beliefs, rituals, temples, priests, its history, Devatas and Davies while coddling and totally ignoring the obviously wrong and illegal mass scale activities by the Muslims and Christians! I am surprised Mr. Deepak has not been the victim of a venal punishment from these "Me Lords" yet, as he practices law in their chambers and still pointing out these egregious assault on reason and the Hindu culture. Are there any provisions in the constitution to impeach these 'Me Lords'?
India needs more and more Sai Deepaks for not allowing Western and other religions laws to be imposed on the main stream of this country. For the sake of individual political parties benefits, the main stream rights are suppressed. It is continuing for generations. New India needs more and more Sai Deepaks..
Namaskaram 🙏🏽 J Sai Deepak thanks 🙏🏽 for a good understanding of the current judiciary’s functioning. We really need to consider changing the current system.
what clearlty. I was reading M. Laxmikant and came across this chapter Judicial Activism, but the chapter did not made any sense to me. And finally I came across your video and it cleared my concept. By the way video is really elucid and powerful. I learned many additional things...🙏
Excellent narration as given by you sir... In judiciary Same thing as happening what I experienced.... when I joined in the bank all the seniors were getting so many benefits and they were not giving to the juniors. who are working for managers as a ...... After my probation immediately changed all the things because we all are equal workers so we need the same benefits to all. in judiciary election is also same thing is going on. I am very much understanding your ideology but the government has to take the steps to change the constitution... hope best things in future... Jay Hind..... Bharat mata ki Jay....
Dear sai Deepak sir, please deliver your knowledge to us as much as possible to cleanse this society as me like common people who fought legal battle for 40 long years for a piece of my father's land given by government of Andhra Pradesh. Till to date the local bodies did not come forward to lay 30 ft road in my locality as per LP 11/1984. Reason the space meant for road has been under encroachment for 30 long years taking lenience of the local influencers and administration failure. Courts did not diver it's judgement so far since the petitioner was forced to withdraw case by Commissioner favouring the encroachers. The legal battle went for 20 yrs out of court and for 20 yrs in the courts. Still justice not done....
Remedy is the first ununderstood depending on which problem is Created…. Answer exists before a question is Created…. Like always I thank you for being a real Education Educated educator & spreader of the Education…..
The problem which sai stated was the most impkrtant of all. The inefficiency of thr executive and the increasing disappointment of the people has what led to increase in judicial activism and it is justified and a legit reason that its not the courts fault but the executive and i fully agree. The only possible ways is to curb the judiciary which will propose an old threat which was subversion of the constitution during emergency and the helplessness of the courts. The solutioms though not the best but i think can curb this an itsy bit would be that we form a committee of parliamentary committees and appointing judicial memebrs as overcome their differences. This would look into what would fall in the jurisdiction of the courts and parliament and try to strike a perfect balance. This way we can have a balance of power between the two as i believe judiciary should play an important role but this has only lead to their interference within the jurisdiction of the executive. They need to understand that its a democracy and government which does not live up to peoples expectations will definitely fall. Therefore, effective solutions would only be social reforms and the above mentioned solution. Important point- courts need to understand that they are looked up as liberal bodies therefore on matters such as the sabrimala verdict- they had to make this judgement or this would only lead to the discourse of the relation between the courts and people. They need to realise at this point they are Monopolised. But fortunately, a 7 judge commiitee would look into these similar cases. But i dont know when itll be passed😂
Absolutely right sir! Yes everyone lords over tax payer commonman.People are left to their mercy. Either you compromise or face the brunt is only the option. Justice delayed is Justice denied.
Sorry. To meet the standard you desire, the people, the voters, should have a very high level of understanding about how to set a legal framework and what should be constraining laws. Practically, there is no country in the world which can qualify to have a democracy ( as ideal as you wish it to be)
Lets elect only who know law example a board which is filled by elected members of each state separately …. That board will select judges according to merit …. And judges will held responsible to board
@kannan Sankaranarayanan, In India people have repeatedly displayed sagacious clarity from time to time - throwing out Indira ji post emergency, voting for Centre and State to different parties, though election was on same date, etc. Many States parties get thrown out literally every alternate election, Rajasthan, Uttarakhand, HP, Karnataka, etc. Therefore, your plea that electorate are not good to elect a government cannot be reason to let judiciary have a free pass. We saw how the SC is wading into Covid relief, Oxygen allocation, BCCI administration, NEET, CUET, appointment of Railway staff, you name it, they are there. At least Executive should sit with collegium and agree on common minimum boundary and get it ratified by Parliament.
@@ramanvk5523 You do have a great point. But, if we look carefully, it is only a defensive move. The voters have responded emotionally on a single point agenda against a particular issue. Though this is welcome, it is neither adequate nor comprehensive. This has actually led to the present political clashes where parties try to set a particular anti-government narrative through protests on each and every initiative of the government. As Sai Deepak warns, Judicial activism also has inherent risks. Especially when the judiciary picks its own people without any oversight of people or their elected representatives. But, to say that the voting electorate, normally swayed away by emotions and freebie /seemingly social welfare announcements, can effectively elect an assembly or parliament that can frame appropriate and fair laws...also seems to be far fetched.
@@ramanvk5523 cannot give credit to big %of ignorant indian public for the mandate in elections. Voters are controlled by political parties with bribe, so the change we see in election results. Educated voters hardly creat a buzz.How many indians understand what is constitution/ democracy or how many educated indians understand even court language?
The Prime minister should strive to end the parivarvad in the appointment of judges also as he promised from the ramparts. Parivarvad in politics cannot be necessarily portrayed as it involves no will of people. But in the judicial appointments, it is always against the will of the people as it is neither their will nor in their interest to confine, at least in the apex court, the selection of judges in their volition who wield supreme power, to a handful of parivars. Till now, most of the Judges were the progeny of the eminent(?) of the judiciary, both bar and bench. Now a scenario of even CJIs making family rows is there. The Prime minister should try with a brave-heart to put down such interests by introducing a transparent, non- entitlement-oriented appointment of judges, especially of CJIs which do not smack of favoritism. He must ward off any danger to democracy and constitution by highly opinionated masters who can pose just tweaking the roster as four judges famously pointed out.
Our laws must be brief, with closed-ended sentences that do not allow for judge misinterpretation during judgments.These laws must be written in a language that Indians of all socioeconomic backgrounds can understand.
Sad and conflict theory that court can cancel the law passed against laws, but sometimes court ignores the fundamental laws....by way of judge made laws whether it is correct... nobody questions even great Advocates
The solution might be this if you want to get njac in our country you have to get a provision in India where it can penalize government actions if they are not performing their duty like provide compensation there.snould be such accountability as well therefore this might ensure doctrine of checks and balances
Since the Sabarimala decision, Mr. J Sai Deepak has been very unsatisfied with the functioning of the Supreme Court and that is evident from the fact that in every speech of Mr. J Sai Deepak he makes reference to Supreme Court’s intervention to People’s religious right which he quotes as unwarranted and unwanted although he is aware of such practices to be discriminatory, gender biased and manifestly arbitrary. A judge of the Supreme Court speaks through his judgements and not through public events, hence Mr. Sai Deepak has the leverage of propagating the functioning of the Supreme Court in a specific perspective which is favourable to his interest in general and viewers in particular. Although Mr. J Sai Deepak mentions of appointment of judges through the collegium system, he deliberately does not lay down the background wherein the collegium system came into operation and that is to curtail the power of appointment to be exercised in an arbitrary manner, to bring only those judges to bench who were favourable to the ruling government. Two such instances were, first, superseding of 3-senior most judges in line to be appointed as CJI by appointment of J. AN Ray as CJI and second, by appointment of J. Beg against J. HR Khanna who was in line of seniority. The intent behind such violation of seniority convention for appointment as CJI by the then ruling Union Government was to teach a lesson to Judges who had held hands of rule of law and refused to uphold the arbitrary exercise of power of the government. J. HR Khanna in Keshavananda Bharati case had although held that parliament had powers to amend the constitution but he had added a rider of basic structure. Further in ADM Jabalpur case, he was the sole dissented who upheld the personal liberty of the individual at the time of emergency while the other held LIFE OF A PERSON CAN BE SNATCHED AWAY WITHOUT FOLLOWING THE PROCEDURE ESTABLISHED BY LAW IN THE TIMES OF EMERGENCY. It is in this context the Supreme Court to safeguard its independence from the shackles of the executive had created the collegium system so that no such awful instances occurs yet again in the history of Indian Judiciary. Further, the collegium system releases a detailed scrutiny of the judicial career and merits of the character of the concerned judge to make a reasonable call before his appointment to Supreme Court. The decision cannot be taken by an individual member of the collegium rather its is the result of collective wisdom. Hence, if executive is allowed to have a veto in the appointment of judges of the Supreme Court there is all possibility of giving it a political flavour resulting in favourable appointments rather than considering only the judicial achievement of the judge. Hence, the collegium system though may have some flaws, which may be addressed during the course of time, but it is the best institution at present for appointment of judges.
Is it not a failure of our parliaments to give the ultimate power to those who are not even tested foR iq? (why not introduce an exam at par with JEE?) And if they are not appointed by the President in consultation of the head, are not all of these appointments illegal?
in no international court, any of the orders passed here, would be valid if it could be contested that the appointments are not legal and so are the orders passed.
I really admire Sai Deepak for his knowledge and passion. But what I am disappointed is, in all of his talk shows, the audience DO GET inspired, clap loudly, but but but . after the show they just dust their backsides and go home. That could be because of the reason, they do not know how to counter the attack on HINDUISM. Now SAI DEEPAK is eloquent speaker and he can convince and galvanize some POLITICIANs or POLITICAL PARTY to initiate actions, protests, PILs against demolition of hindu temples, against diversion of the monen taken from hindu temples and given to MUSLIM & CHRISTIAN places of worship. Why nothing is being done. If I understand correctly SAI DEEP himself is an advocate, yet I didn’t note any PILs filed by him against the DMK Govt of Tamil Nadu?
His job is to enlighten and educate. What is preventing you from using his Knowledge and doing something?? What does he have to do with DMK, he’s already fought for Hijab and Sabrimala. You can file petitions too
I can watch this 5 times back to back and still not get bored, man is spitting facts in every single line.
LOLS TRUE! 😂😂
Hence the Solution is we need JURY COURT and DEMOLISH THIS CORRUPT COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY COURTS
It is a path breaking speech by Shree J Sai Deepak and is an eye opener to all open minded educated people of the country who respect the Judiciary and also expect it to perform its designated role. The whole country is suffering from the combined effect of non performance of Executives, Legislature and of the Judicial activism. One of the very important and valid reasons of piling up of pending cases before the various courts of this country may be this. Every sensitive and open minded citizen of this country would sincerely expect all these very very important arms of the State to function properly and to discharge their designated duties effectively. And hence, this speech of Shree J Sai Deepak is very very timely and should reach to maximum number of people for mass awareness and to create a mass appeal in this regard.
90% of the MPs can't articulate like him.
it is a pleasure to listen to him, every word he says is relevant, i can listen to this guy for hours
I’m not sure why Modi government doesn’t hire him as a consultant for the Ministry of Law? He has a great insight into the functioning of the judiciary system.
I rate JSD as an aspiring Judge concluding his career as a SCJ.
@@anuragatytc q
Q
Hence the Solution is we need JURY COURT and DEMOLISH THIS CORRUPT COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY COURTS
Modi don't want any one who are more intelligent or can question Modi
Modi wants yes
Reminds me of Late Arun Jaitley who said ‘Tyranny of the unelected’ after the SC order on the NJAC bill.
NJAC was a pathetic bill, jaitley would obviously say as govtlost power to their pawns as judges. The current collegium ensures thatno stooge of govt gets into judiciary, so that impartiality is maintained
@@aksshaysharma96but collegium is biased,you can't make it to hc judgeship if you're first generation lawyer or judge
@@eklavyajain09 do a google search of how many 1gen lawyers have become hc judges.
Never seen anyone who publicly spoke reality of higher level judiciary power,it's abuse ......interference by government.....and consequences of judicial activism on common man and it's solutions....wow great,❤️........I think in reality through hard and intelligent, long efforts (even with sufferings,now and then by many) by group of men can bring changes in system of nation
Very good speech. He never disappoints. Very very clear in communication. A glance at the previous appointments of CJIs shows that the existing collegium ensures dynastic supercession. Why to blame the GOP of India. That may be one of the reasons these judges don't want NJC. Sad.
Great. Lucid, enlightening. Only an erudite , confident and courageous Advocate can be so outspoken. Saideepak is one such.
Fantastic session 👏 👌.
His profound knowledge and command over languages is commendable.
Hence the Solution is we need JURY COURT and DEMOLISH THIS CORRUPT COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY COURTS
Just mind blowing, but see the viewer ship, you can understand the sole problem, thanks sai.....
This man deserves huge respect and support
I have written against the SC Judges which was published in Organiser issue dated 17 July 22. Am anxiously waiting for contempt of court proceeding against me so that I would get a golden opportunity to make my main contentions a worldwide issue.
chad!
You are a brave man! May be with a streak of masochism(?). in fact I am surprised, JSDhasn't been thrown that Contempt of Court Brahmastra by the judges already!
This is one of the most comprehensive and down to earth talks on the evils of judicial activism and its causes. No intellectual posturing. Only facts.
I have noticed that the Supreme Court started encroaching upon the territory of judiciary from early 1990s, when the era of co-alition governments started. That was when the Second Judges's transfer judgment was delivered vesting the power of appointment of judges in the Judiciary. A strong government would have prevented this occurrance. It is good that the present government has recently demanded its representation in the collegium. Otherwise, it will continue to be a club of favouring the cronies.
During the last thirty years, the weakness of the Executive and the Parliament has let the judiciary rule the roost. With 50% of the parliamentarins having criminal cases against them, and the corruption in bureaucray and State politics being legion, little wonder that the Legislautre and the executive lack the moral authority to re-assert their true role in the constitutional framework.
JSD is very articulate in expression of the thoughts without any iota of confusion within himself and giving no chance of any statement of his to be taken back. Very versatile and the Audience gets educated on the Grammar, Subject, Skill Development, Leadership Qualities etc
Every single line is a fact and, you cornered the true problem with facts that we can't realise in day to day life. Good analysis and thankyou for letting us to the world through your eye, now you are not alone.😊
My sense of respect is active with full potential.
We need more lawyers and judges like Sai Deepak
Nation needs people like u who speak truth..
Wow what a analysis..... Great man 🤩
Wow! This the first time I am coming across the answer to my old and repeated question that I had been asking as to who and how are the judges, especially SC judges, are selected and appointed!!! And of course, who else than J. Say Deepak is the only one saying the 'simple' provision in the constitution. Well done, Shrimaan. Why has there been no opposition, resistance, counter efforts in and out of Parliament by the BJP government to assert itself to correct this situation? A constitution that ignores the whole elected Parliament in choosing and appointing judges - SC judges, especially - is a flawed constitution! Is this why Mr. Modi and his cabinet and whole BJP remain silent? The CJI seems to operate and makes not only legal pronouncements about the cases in front of his bench, he freely and improperly makes many personal statements, comments, denigration including threats of "Contempt of Court" weapon at anybody that criticizes him or the court! He essentially is behaving as the Viceroy 2.0 with assumption of absolute power. This is insane. The court(s) have been usurping the power of the elected parliament and issue "Fatwas" with threats even to the PMO and its cabinet. Who is going to "bell the cat"? And with history of targeng all Hindu traditions, beliefs, rituals, temples, priests, its history, Devatas and Davies while coddling and totally ignoring the obviously wrong and illegal mass scale activities by the Muslims and Christians! I am surprised Mr. Deepak has not been the victim of a venal punishment from these "Me Lords" yet, as he practices law in their chambers and still pointing out these egregious assault on reason and the Hindu culture. Are there any provisions in the constitution to impeach these 'Me Lords'?
Every lawyer and judges needs to be reminded this
J Sai Deepak ji ko Hardik Pranaam💐💐💐
Just saw the news of appointment of new CJI of India, it's such a shame we can never have a Chief justice like jai sai Deepak
He is not eligible to be CJI
@@debu98 why not
@@rangersanbharatheeyan8778 check the criteria
India needs more and more Sai Deepaks for not allowing Western and other religions laws to be imposed on the main stream of this country. For the sake of individual political parties benefits, the main stream rights are suppressed. It is continuing for generations. New India needs more and more Sai Deepaks..
हर हर महादेव 🙌🏾🚩
Namaskaram 🙏🏽 J Sai Deepak thanks 🙏🏽 for a good understanding of the current judiciary’s functioning. We really need to consider changing the current system.
Fantastic. Thanks for hosting it here.
he is a genius man, I love watching his videos, gives more knowledge than a book, also I learnt new words today
Completely agree
God bless the nation through these great nationalist attorneys.
Sai Deepak is great reformer. Every words he speaks have huge national values.
Thanks to @Buddhi and Sai Deepak for the informative session...♥️♥️
what clearlty. I was reading M. Laxmikant and came across this chapter Judicial Activism, but the chapter did not made any sense to me. And finally I came across your video and it cleared my concept. By the way video is really elucid and powerful. I learned many additional things...🙏
Deepak ji have insight knowledge of law ,indian heritage , culture ,sanatan sanskriti nd overall he is true भारतीय ,ईश्वर तुम्हे सफलता प्रदान करे
Seriously an Eye Opener.
You are new sun on the horizon. The best of wishes.
Extremely well explained. It was quite enlightening
Excellent narration as given by you sir...
In judiciary Same thing as happening what I experienced....
when I joined in the bank all the seniors were getting so many benefits and they were not giving to the juniors. who are working for managers as a ......
After my probation immediately changed all the things because we all are equal workers so we need the same benefits to all. in judiciary election is also same thing is going on. I am very much understanding your ideology but the government has to take the steps to change the constitution...
hope best things in future...
Jay Hind..... Bharat mata ki Jay....
Sai Deepak is so brilliant. He deserves to be the chief justice of India.The clarity he brings in ,in to his talks are absolutely wonderful.
Hence the Solution is we need JURY COURT and DEMOLISH THIS CORRUPT COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY COURTS
Salute to you Sai Deepak 🙏🙏
Superb sir, central govt has to look in to it and in the interest of people , they should implement
SUPER! God bless, Sai!
Activism has made the world a more beautiful and livable place, driving positive change and promoting justice for all."
Judicial activism is a consequence of executive and parliament's negligence towards fulfillment of their duty.
Dear sai Deepak sir, please deliver your knowledge to us as much as possible to cleanse this society as me like common people who fought legal battle for 40 long years for a piece of my father's land given by government of Andhra Pradesh. Till to date the local bodies did not come forward to lay 30 ft road in my locality as per LP 11/1984. Reason the space meant for road has been under encroachment for 30 long years taking lenience of the local influencers and administration failure. Courts did not diver it's judgement so far since the petitioner was forced to withdraw case by Commissioner favouring the encroachers. The legal battle went for 20 yrs out of court and for 20 yrs in the courts. Still justice not done....
More power to you.
🤔 hmm......
This video raised so many doubts and questions🧐
Remedy is the first ununderstood depending on which problem is Created….
Answer exists before a question is Created….
Like always I thank you for being a real Education Educated educator & spreader of the Education…..
Extremely enlightening. Thanks 🙏
🙏 Sai Deepak 🙏
Thanks for this awesome session
well said
In this hammam no one is clothed. You said Sir...So govt or Supreme Court kotha sab ki.milibhagat hAi.👍
Your videos are so knowledgeable and thought provoking
Future PM🙏🙏
You are the rarest of rare gem Mr. J Sai Deepak. Modi Govt should make use of him without any second thought.
💯💯🔥🔥
very nice speech
Solute to Sai ji for his work, Hindus, Please don’t keep listening and do nothing for your community, get organised.
Thanks ♥️
Fact
A Gem. Sai Deepak has given shivers to lutyens gang, leftist intellectuals, guys like Rajdeep, Tharoor , N Ram like characters.
I agree with sai sir👍
Great intellect in India I noticed----
1.Abhijit chavda
2.sai Deepak
3.ramanujan
4.s jaishankar and
The problem which sai stated was the most impkrtant of all. The inefficiency of thr executive and the increasing disappointment of the people has what led to increase in judicial activism and it is justified and a legit reason that its not the courts fault but the executive and i fully agree. The only possible ways is to curb the judiciary which will propose an old threat which was subversion of the constitution during emergency and the helplessness of the courts. The solutioms though not the best but i think can curb this an itsy bit would be that we form a committee of parliamentary committees and appointing judicial memebrs as overcome their differences. This would look into what would fall in the jurisdiction of the courts and parliament and try to strike a perfect balance. This way we can have a balance of power between the two as i believe judiciary should play an important role but this has only lead to their interference within the jurisdiction of the executive. They need to understand that its a democracy and government which does not live up to peoples expectations will definitely fall. Therefore, effective solutions would only be social reforms and the above mentioned solution. Important point- courts need to understand that they are looked up as liberal bodies therefore on matters such as the sabrimala verdict- they had to make this judgement or this would only lead to the discourse of the relation between the courts and people. They need to realise at this point they are Monopolised. But fortunately, a 7 judge commiitee would look into these similar cases. But i dont know when itll be passed😂
Thanks
Is there any official RUclips channel of Sai Deepak sir?
Power without accountability is more dangerous than terrorism.
Well said
Absolutely right sir!
Yes everyone lords over tax payer commonman.People are left to their mercy. Either you compromise or face the brunt is only the option. Justice delayed is Justice denied.
Excellent. Very true.👍👍👍
Facts facts facts
Sorry. To meet the standard you desire, the people, the voters, should have a very high level of understanding about how to set a legal framework and what should be constraining laws. Practically, there is no country in the world which can qualify to have a democracy ( as ideal as you wish it to be)
Pretty spot on.
Lets elect only who know law example a board which is filled by elected members of each state separately …. That board will select judges according to merit …. And judges will held responsible to board
@kannan Sankaranarayanan, In India people have repeatedly displayed sagacious clarity from time to time - throwing out Indira ji post emergency, voting for Centre and State to different parties, though election was on same date, etc. Many States parties get thrown out literally every alternate election, Rajasthan, Uttarakhand, HP, Karnataka, etc. Therefore, your plea that electorate are not good to elect a government cannot be reason to let judiciary have a free pass.
We saw how the SC is wading into Covid relief, Oxygen allocation, BCCI administration, NEET, CUET, appointment of Railway staff, you name it, they are there. At least Executive should sit with collegium and agree on common minimum boundary and get it ratified by Parliament.
@@ramanvk5523 You do have a great point. But, if we look carefully, it is only a defensive move. The voters have responded emotionally on a single point agenda against a particular issue. Though this is welcome, it is neither adequate nor comprehensive. This has actually led to the present political clashes where parties try to set a particular anti-government narrative through protests on each and every initiative of the government. As Sai Deepak warns, Judicial activism also has inherent risks. Especially when the judiciary picks its own people without any oversight of people or their elected representatives. But, to say that the voting electorate, normally swayed away by emotions and freebie /seemingly social welfare announcements, can effectively elect an assembly or parliament that can frame appropriate and fair laws...also seems to be far fetched.
@@ramanvk5523 cannot give credit to big %of ignorant indian public for the mandate in elections.
Voters are controlled by political parties with bribe, so the change we see in election results. Educated voters hardly creat a buzz.How many indians understand what is constitution/ democracy or how many educated indians understand even court language?
Hat's off to you JSD, 👌👍🙏💪
Jordan Peterson of India...and in some respects, even better.
The Prime minister should strive to end the parivarvad in the appointment of judges also as he promised from the ramparts. Parivarvad in politics cannot be necessarily portrayed as it involves no will of people. But in the judicial appointments, it is always against the will of the people as it is neither their will nor in their interest to confine, at least in the apex court, the selection of judges in their volition who wield supreme power, to a handful of parivars. Till now, most of the Judges were the progeny of the eminent(?) of the judiciary, both bar and bench. Now a scenario of even CJIs making family rows is there. The Prime minister should try with a brave-heart to put down such interests by introducing a transparent, non- entitlement-oriented appointment of judges, especially of CJIs which do not smack of favoritism. He must ward off any danger to democracy and constitution by highly opinionated masters who can pose just tweaking the roster as four judges famously pointed out.
Judicial activism can and never ought to be judicial arrogance!
Our laws must be brief, with closed-ended sentences that do not allow for judge misinterpretation during judgments.These laws must be written in a language that Indians of all socioeconomic backgrounds can understand.
Wonderful
Comrades playing dirty in judi€iary
Counsel J S Deepak is a impressive orator possessed with facts and the law.
When a single person has more wisdom than entire cohort of Congress and Left.
Sad and conflict theory that court can cancel the law passed against laws, but sometimes court ignores the fundamental laws....by way of judge made laws whether it is correct... nobody questions even great Advocates
The solution might be this if you want to get njac in our country you have to get a provision in India where it can penalize government actions if they are not performing their duty like provide compensation there.snould be such accountability as well therefore this might ensure doctrine of checks and balances
Since the Sabarimala decision, Mr. J Sai Deepak has been very unsatisfied with the functioning of the Supreme Court and that is evident from the fact that in every speech of Mr. J Sai Deepak he makes reference to Supreme Court’s intervention to People’s religious right which he quotes as unwarranted and unwanted although he is aware of such practices to be discriminatory, gender biased and manifestly arbitrary. A judge of the Supreme Court speaks through his judgements and not through public events, hence Mr. Sai Deepak has the leverage of propagating the functioning of the Supreme Court in a specific perspective which is favourable to his interest in general and viewers in particular. Although Mr. J Sai Deepak mentions of appointment of judges through the collegium system, he deliberately does not lay down the background wherein the collegium system came into operation and that is to curtail the power of appointment to be exercised in an arbitrary manner, to bring only those judges to bench who were favourable to the ruling government. Two such instances were, first, superseding of 3-senior most judges in line to be appointed as CJI by appointment of J. AN Ray as CJI and second, by appointment of J. Beg against J. HR Khanna who was in line of seniority. The intent behind such violation of seniority convention for appointment as CJI by the then ruling Union Government was to teach a lesson to Judges who had held hands of rule of law and refused to uphold the arbitrary exercise of power of the government. J. HR Khanna in Keshavananda Bharati case had although held that parliament had powers to amend the constitution but he had added a rider of basic structure. Further in ADM Jabalpur case, he was the sole dissented who upheld the personal liberty of the individual at the time of emergency while the other held LIFE OF A PERSON CAN BE SNATCHED AWAY WITHOUT FOLLOWING THE PROCEDURE ESTABLISHED BY LAW IN THE TIMES OF EMERGENCY. It is in this context the Supreme Court to safeguard its independence from the shackles of the executive had created the collegium system so that no such awful instances occurs yet again in the history of Indian Judiciary. Further, the collegium system releases a detailed scrutiny of the judicial career and merits of the character of the concerned judge to make a reasonable call before his appointment to Supreme Court. The decision cannot be taken by an individual member of the collegium rather its is the result of collective wisdom. Hence, if executive is allowed to have a veto in the appointment of judges of the Supreme Court there is all possibility of giving it a political flavour resulting in favourable appointments rather than considering only the judicial achievement of the judge. Hence, the collegium system though may have some flaws, which may be addressed during the course of time, but it is the best institution at present for appointment of judges.
That’s why they have so many pending cases. The judges are investing the time in the constitution and not doing their jobs
Hindus in India- pls protect Hindu culture and the hindu languages. Pls save your roots and protect your motherland.
Kuch nhi hona isse duniya world government ki taraf ja rahi hai
Wonderful, valuable, clear explanation of the Judicial system... By Jai Sai.🙏🙏👌👌
Is it not a failure of our parliaments to give the ultimate power to those who are not even tested foR iq? (why not introduce an exam at par with JEE?)
And if they are not appointed by the President in consultation of the head, are not all of these appointments illegal?
in no international court, any of the orders passed here, would be valid if it could be contested that the appointments are not legal and so are the orders passed.
🦁
Commendable 👍
I think he should write new constitution of India with anand rangnathan.🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Tere baap me bhi dum nhi smjha.
Kya english h yarr......I want to learn that level of English
YOU NEED TO HAVE THAT LEVEL OF PATRIOTISM FIRST TO LEARN THAT LEVEL OF ENGLISH TO CARE ABOUT THAT KIND OF ARTICULATION IN POINTS.😑😒
Rare genius
👏👏👏👏🌟🌟🌟 Pristine Clarity . Brilliant!!
I really admire Sai Deepak for his knowledge and passion. But what I am disappointed is, in all of his talk shows, the audience DO GET inspired, clap loudly, but but but . after the show they just dust their backsides and go home.
That could be because of the reason, they do not know how to counter the attack on HINDUISM.
Now SAI DEEPAK is eloquent speaker and he can convince and galvanize some POLITICIANs or POLITICAL PARTY to initiate actions, protests, PILs against demolition of hindu temples, against diversion of the monen taken from hindu temples and given to MUSLIM & CHRISTIAN places of worship.
Why nothing is being done. If I understand correctly SAI DEEP himself is an advocate, yet I didn’t note any PILs filed by him against the DMK Govt of Tamil Nadu?
His job is to enlighten and educate. What is preventing you from using his Knowledge and doing something?? What does he have to do with DMK, he’s already fought for Hijab and Sabrimala. You can file petitions too
How can we control the SC and prevent its actuvism
The executive has crossed all Lakshman Rekhas
🙌
nice
It's because of the poor formulation of laws that gives discretionary power to judges
👍👏👏
He can single handedly defeat entire left leaning community 😂
Jury system of Americans can be adopted? I don't know.