This truly was one of the concept I was concerned with. With so many different force formula and it's types it is one of the confused concept to many students.
I think a good way to put this, where the Newton forces don’t add up to the same number on both sides of the equation, is that if you walk a diagonal line to get from Pointe a to B, this will take less time and energy than walking a horizontal line plus a vertical line, But you do end up at the exact same place. And that is what the vector equation is saying, that you end up at the same exact point, even though the amount of energy it takes to get there is different.
My friend. I took my last class on trig some 50 years ago night school. Your classes have caused me some problems. This class was super informative. At 80 yrs. I am not as rapid mentally but you are very through and it brings tighter things from your earlier classes. Many many thanks.
@@MathAndScience Consider what is E=MC2. c squared CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. Consider what is THE EARTH/ground. Consider what is E=MC2. Now, consider what is THE EYE; AND consider what is the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE. SO, consider what is the BALANCED MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of/as SPACE; AS c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE; AS WHAT IS E=MC2 CLEARLY proves (ON BALANCE) that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Indeed, notice what is the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON ON BALANCE. Now, consider what is the orange (AND setting) Sun ON BALANCE !! They are the SAME SIZE as what is THE EYE. The rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution, AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! CONSIDER WHAT IS E=MC2 ON BALANCE. Gravity is an interaction that cannot be shielded (or blocked) ON BALANCE !!! Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE !!! c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! Indeed, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! Think. What is E=MC2 is dimensionally consistent. What is THE EARTH/ground is fully consistent with/as (AND IT IS BALANCED WITH/AS) what is E=MC2 (ON/IN BALANCE). BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE), AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. Again, ON BALANCE, consider what is the BALANCED MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of/as SPACE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! CLEARLY, I have mathematically proven and explained what is the fourth dimension. Magnificent. By Frank Martin DiMeglio
@@MathAndScience TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Gravity is an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded (or blocked) ON BALANCE. Consider what is the man (AND THE EYE ON BALANCE) who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE, AS WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma; AS the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE. This CLEARLY explains and proves the fourth dimension. c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE !!!! Indeed, E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma; AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. Notice the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE. Consider WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE, AS c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. INDEED, WHAT IS E=MC2 is dimensionally consistent; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma; AS GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. “Mass”/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Accordingly, ON BALANCE, what are OBJECTS may fall at the SAME RATE. Consider what is the orange (AND setting) Sun AND what is the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON ON BALANCE. They are the SAME SIZE as what is THE EYE. WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma. CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma, AS the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution; AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). By Frank Martin DiMeglio
This gentleman is outstanding. It is rare for someone with such deep ability to also be able to perceive and correct the stumbling points of the novice.
When I first saw the Sine & Cosine video I had the same question. I never said anything because I was only interested in sin & cos, but just thinking about it, I realised how it works. You know they are still making comments on that video arguing first without ever taking some time to think about it. O yea, & the never ending comments about the stick man. I love learning this stuff & you teach it so well. Thank you. I hope you have a great weekend
Thanks so much. Yeah I have answered that question dozens of times over on that video :). It’s ok though - I want to know the confusing bits so I can clear them up!
Mr. Jason, you are an amazing Instructor. I appreciate your knowledge ability that YOU offer me. I am trying to teach myself through your lessons. I don't understand how You got the angle of 36.9. I have no calculator. I do my work manually. Please explain. I will review trigonometry. Thank You. Lenora
Sir - Very nice … A small query -> “ If I throw a ball in space with force ‘F’ , the will move in space continuously. Will the ball will have same acceleration throughout its journey? Or same velocity throughout journey ( means Zero force ) ?
i got this information from an learning web page called Byju's is it correct A force is required to change the state of motion of an object. It can move an object at rest, stop and slow a moving object and/or change the direction of a moving object. A force is required to stop a moving object. - Byju's
A force is required to change the state of motion of an object. It can move an object at rest, stop and slow a moving object and/or change the direction of a moving object. A force is required to stop a moving object. - Byju's
I will always think of gravity as a force. So what if space time is warped. The force of gravity caused it to warp :) So maybe gravity is not a force on the object that is affected (like an asteroid approaching Earth) but spacetime being warped caused the object to change direction so in effect, gravy applied an indirect force on the asteroid. This argument goes way back and seems to be more about personalities than facts :)
If two vettors they act one horizontal and one vertical with the same force of 4N what is its angle of moviment? Or there is no angle of moviment because the two forces cancel each other out , because they are in a point of equilubrium.
This makes me think of the pyramids! I don't know how they were built but if the Egyptians knew how much force they had available and how much force they needed they could have built a platform at an angle to match the work necessary to move the large loads.
In your example where you apply force to the baseball in space in order to cause motion, can you move an asteroid in the same exact way as a baseball in this context or will it be different?
Should force be measured in apples? Which variety - Golden Delicious or Braeburns? 1GD = 1N?? Would a conversion factor be needed for Braeburns to Golden Delicious. Do you have different apple varieties in the US? Europe apples to USA apples??
I can NOT express how thankful I am for these videos. No teacher has ever explained these topics so in depth. Thank you so very much 🙏🏼💚🦕
Went back to college at 39... your videos are really helping me
Reminds me of my past Cal3 professor. So much passion in his explanations.
May the lord continue blessing you for the great work u are doing sir.
Truly a wonderful teacher ! God bless you sir 🙏
As a turk, for some reason english lessons are way easier to remember and learn.. I love this channel.
Thank you so much!
This truly was one of the concept I was concerned with. With so many different force formula and it's types it is one of the confused concept to many students.
I think a good way to put this, where the Newton forces don’t add up to the same number on both sides of the equation, is that if you walk a diagonal line to get from Pointe a to B, this will take less time and energy than walking a horizontal line plus a vertical line, But you do end up at the exact same place. And that is what the vector equation is saying, that you end up at the same exact point, even though the amount of energy it takes to get there is different.
Sir you are that someone that can cause the love for the subject physics
My friend. I took my last class on trig some 50 years ago night school. Your classes have caused me some problems. This class was super informative. At 80 yrs. I am not as rapid mentally but you are very through and it brings tighter things from your earlier classes. Many many thanks.
Am so blessed to be part of your classes,😊 physics has been a mystery to me but am seeing change,here in uganda 🎉🎉
" You're an incredible teacher thank you so much"
Welcome!
I ᴀᴍ ɪɴᴅɪᴀɴ
@@MathAndScience Consider what is E=MC2. c squared CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. Consider what is THE EARTH/ground. Consider what is E=MC2. Now, consider what is THE EYE; AND consider what is the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE. SO, consider what is the BALANCED MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of/as SPACE; AS c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE; AS WHAT IS E=MC2 CLEARLY proves (ON BALANCE) that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Indeed, notice what is the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON ON BALANCE. Now, consider what is the orange (AND setting) Sun ON BALANCE !! They are the SAME SIZE as what is THE EYE. The rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution, AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! CONSIDER WHAT IS E=MC2 ON BALANCE. Gravity is an interaction that cannot be shielded (or blocked) ON BALANCE !!! Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE !!! c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! Indeed, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! Think. What is E=MC2 is dimensionally consistent. What is THE EARTH/ground is fully consistent with/as (AND IT IS BALANCED WITH/AS) what is E=MC2 (ON/IN BALANCE). BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE), AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. Again, ON BALANCE, consider what is the BALANCED MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of/as SPACE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! CLEARLY, I have mathematically proven and explained what is the fourth dimension. Magnificent.
By Frank Martin DiMeglio
@@MathAndScience TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Gravity is an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded (or blocked) ON BALANCE.
Consider what is the man (AND THE EYE ON BALANCE) who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE, AS WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma; AS the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE. This CLEARLY explains and proves the fourth dimension. c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE !!!! Indeed, E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma; AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. Notice the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE. Consider WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE, AS c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. INDEED, WHAT IS E=MC2 is dimensionally consistent; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma; AS GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. “Mass”/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Accordingly, ON BALANCE, what are OBJECTS may fall at the SAME RATE. Consider what is the orange (AND setting) Sun AND what is the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON ON BALANCE. They are the SAME SIZE as what is THE EYE. WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma. CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma, AS the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution; AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE).
By Frank Martin DiMeglio
@@ufs4.1me too😊
Greetings from Hong Kong. Your teaching is so great and helpful.
This gentleman is outstanding. It is rare for someone with such deep ability to also be able to perceive and correct the stumbling points of the novice.
Of All Your Lectures you are one of the Excellent lecturer.
Thank you I love because they really get to my understanding.
Sir, wonderfulley intersting way of teaching ❤
What an excellent teacher/lecturer
thank u very much
Your videos are amazing.
Love it 💕❤️
Thanks so much!
This is the way how you teach students thank you
When I first saw the Sine & Cosine video I had the same question. I never said anything because I was only interested in sin & cos, but just thinking about it, I realised how it works. You know they are still making comments on that video arguing first without ever taking some time to think about it. O yea, & the never ending comments about the stick man.
I love learning this stuff & you teach it so well. Thank you.
I hope you have a great weekend
Thanks so much. Yeah I have answered that question dozens of times over on that video :). It’s ok though - I want to know the confusing bits so I can clear them up!
Mr. Jason, you are an amazing Instructor. I appreciate your knowledge ability that YOU offer me. I am trying to teach myself through your lessons. I don't understand how You got the angle of 36.9. I have no calculator. I do my work manually. Please explain. I will review trigonometry. Thank You. Lenora
Sir - Very nice …
A small query -> “ If I throw a ball in space with force ‘F’ , the will move in space continuously. Will the ball will have same acceleration throughout its journey? Or same velocity throughout journey ( means Zero force ) ?
Nice learning from a great and wonderful teacher like you many many thanks 🙏
So nice of you!
Thank you professor! What class 💯 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
You are god sent Mr. Gibson. They pay these athletes ridiculous 💰 when they really should be paying awesome teachers like yourself those money.
So basic sir 10x and much respect ❤️❤️❤️
Amazing teacher, thank you🎉
Amazing content, thank you sir
You are so unique in your perfect explanation 🤝🤝✍️✍️✍️🎇🎇🎇
-y axis 0-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10
🤓🤓🤓❤❤❤❤... My favorite PHYSICS ❤❤❤ ... You are a great teacher, love all the lessons
Great explanation ❤
really I appreciate you your work
your work
thank you
52:00 Rockets 🚀 Question:: What is a minimum necessary TWR for a vertical rocket launch which burns at least one second???
Good job!
i got this information from an learning web page called Byju's is it correct
A force is required to change the state of motion of an object. It can move an object at rest, stop and slow a moving object and/or change the direction of a moving object.
A force is required to stop a moving object. - Byju's
A force is required to change the state of motion of an object. It can move an object at rest, stop and slow a moving object and/or change the direction of a moving object.
A force is required to stop a moving object. - Byju's
I like the way you teach
Thank you so much for this great lecture.
force 2(5n) fx=4n fy=3n}
Thanks so very much for this video. It's like you've removed a clog in my brain. God Bless.
THANK YOU... SIR...!!!
45 degrees below the horizontal
45 degrees half=22.5 36.9 degrees half=18.4
I will always think of gravity as a force. So what if space time is warped. The force of gravity caused it to warp :) So maybe gravity is not a force on the object that is affected (like an asteroid approaching Earth) but spacetime being warped caused the object to change direction so in effect, gravy applied an indirect force on the asteroid. This argument goes way back and seems to be more about personalities than facts :)
Nice teaching
Thank you.
45 degrees x-7 axis y-7 axis 7x7 =49
If two vettors they act one horizontal and one vertical with the same force of 4N what is its angle of moviment? Or there is no angle of moviment because the two forces cancel each other out , because they are in a point of equilubrium.
If we use triangular law of addition, resultant force is going to be √4^2+4^2=√32=4√2 and angle 45°.
This makes me think of the pyramids! I don't know how they were built but if the Egyptians knew how much force they had available and how much force they needed they could have built a platform at an angle to match the work necessary to move the large loads.
10.0 newton -x axis 10 -y axis
Thank you sir
Amazing !
In your example where you apply force to the baseball in space in order to cause motion, can you move an asteroid in the same exact way as a baseball in this context or will it be different?
Agree i learn out from your
Do E&M and I'll be a fan. Registered EE
fx=10 cos(-45 degrees)
-x=-1 y-2 45x2=90 45/2=22.5
" Incredible teacher thanks for everything"
You are very welcome!
11.07n x axis -4.07n y axis
I appreciate it
-0-=tan-1(-4.07/11.07)
great!
fx=10n-2.93=7.07 n
Should force be measured in apples? Which variety - Golden Delicious or Braeburns?
1GD = 1N?? Would a conversion factor be needed for Braeburns to Golden Delicious. Do you have different apple varieties in the US? Europe apples to USA apples??
Red Delicious is the best. Always go w/best.
Really good
Glad you think so!
vertical horizontal component
/122.5+16.6
45 degrees 36.9 degrees
God bless u😊❤
45 degrees+36.9 degrees=11.07n
5 n 36.9 degrees
x axis y axis 14/2=7
Does force only affect baryonic matter?
4x3=12
l\
270 degrees 180 degrees
-5-2.07
36.9 degrees
-o-=-20.2 degrees
radius 180 degrees
-20.2 degrees
0 below horizontal
-o-=tan-(3/4)
Does force stop
10:47-27am4/1/24
Awesome
force is push and pull
f net x=11.07 n
5x/2
asks horizontal verical components
Any amount of force moves any amount of mass???😊
43:00 It moves the block, but ONLY IF IT IS IN SPACE!!! Ok, that was true fairytale-physics
45 degrees
can you upload the physics 1 course algebra based unit 5 on the mathandscience app
sir will these lecture will be simultaneously uploaded on app too?
-2.7
10(/2/2)=5/2
-1+ 2
9/3=3
10(1/2)=10/2=5