Hey guys! This is a reupload of our Samuel R. Delany episode. Several people correctly pointed out that Samuel R. Delany's skin tone in the first version was too light, inadvertently coding him as white. We've corrected the issue here and apologize for the mistake.
of all the episodes to have to re-upload because of a mistake it is very ironically funny to me that this episode had to be the one that being said it is a pleasure to rewatch as well
Read it, liked it. Was left with the feeling it was trying to tell me something I just didn't get; but, wasn't willing to wade through it again to see if I could get it.
Thank you for the introduction to Samuel R. Delaney's works. I suggest for anyone trying to get into his work to read Nova and Babel-17, both of these books had scenes ripped straight from Akira, or maybe it was influenced by them?
Misquoted final/initial lines! "I have come to, to wound the autumnal city". (The comma is just to make it clear there's a brief pause as you flip back to the start of the book.) This completely changes the message since it makes it clear that leaving the city changes your mental state. At first glance that means that entering Bellona also changed it but I don't think that's necessarily true - it might call out to wounded people who then leave after they've been healed in some way. I wish I could remember where I read this observation so I could give them proper credit.
I thought it was just me. There is a rather long tradition of magical cities; Atlantis, Ultima Thule, Shangri La, Amber, Dhalgren. Hmm, I suppose there's more.
So this book is like the netflix series dark? it at least sounds similar like the time machine in dark was created because the inventor hat the broken future version of the time machine so he was able to reverse engineer it so idk go watch dark its a great series and like onbe of the best german productions in the last 10 years and it even got a season 2 like 3 weeks ago
If it so confusing and people can't understand it then why is it SF? Shouldn't it be Fantasy. Fantasy can get away with confusing etc. (Full Disclosure: Apart from Tolkien & Pratchett I don't read Fantasy. And I prefer SF that gives some sort of answer (even if it is implausible). I hate no answers.
I could not get into Delany. I read both _Dhalgren_ and _Triton._ To me, both of them were boring and hard to read. _Triton_ seemed to be about a self-centered man who went through many changes in body and circumstance, but with all the change about him, he himself remained the same jerk he started out. That may have been the point, but it was a boring one. The one work of his I liked was a short story called _Time Considered as a Helix of Semi-Precious Stones._ It was because I liked that which led me to force myself to finish the two novels.
The kid only had one shoe. Time to reupload the video. j/k I don't think "It's good because I don't understand it" is much of a recommendation. It has some sex scenes though.
I didn't saw the video the first time it came out, and I didn't finished it this time XD It's just, I don't really like the books that gies me brain knobs ^^
As a pragmatist, this seems like exactly the kind of thing that makes me think postmodernism is useless, infuriating, pretentious vomit. It's why The Last Jedi was such a mess: when the point of a work is entirely to subvert expectation, it lacks a center, and thus a purpose, and thus a reason for me to care. Extreme relativism is the same as nihilism.
Dahlgren explained: the city has somehow crossed into a demiplane shaped like a mobius strip. That's why there is no sense of time. Kit is familiar to them because he has left the city and returned many times.
Don't worry, Dhalgren is not "the definition of literature". Take it from someone who's actually read it; it's just a pointless, meandering slog through roughly 700 pages of insanely gratuitous sex scenes and that's about it. If I were you, I wouldn't waste any more time trying to read it.
Reading Dhalgren was a spiritual experience for me. I read the audiobook, narrated by Stefan Rudnicki, and I anticipate coming back to the book several more times in the years to come to see just how differently the story feels on subsequent readings. I anticipate it will almost be like the light caught in a chain of prisms, mirrors, lenses; once you look away, or even blink, the whole image has shifted
This is good. I did think he was white, though as a european the physical skin pigment holds more weight to me than heritage when thinking of whether you're black or white. In any case, now i know, thanks.
Not amusing, but this reviews sounds like how someone, who hasn't read the book, would write a review of it. It hits on many of the basic ideas that other reviewers have said of the book, while not being at all specific. Half of the review is: here is the 1st and last sentence of the book, now here it is again written together, oh and it's circular, oh here's what Gibson said, then oh it's difficult, then oh kids journey was this and this (so broad as to not say anything specific, because someone who hasn't read this risks outing them self if they try to come up with something specific, just based off of all the other Wikipedia type reviews). Sorry for the negativity, but this review feels very insulting to Delany's art
This was actually my first Delany book, which I first read when I was in High School. It's a very challenging book, yet somehow I found it incredibly engaging. It's an odd mixture of magical realism and proto-cyberpunk that has never been repeated. It's also horny. EXTREMELY horny, in the way only a book written in the mid 70s could have been published.
I see a pattern in these mind warping trops,a lot of the "answers" are not answers,it's usually speculation,ideas,theories and up to the reader,watcher exc. I feel like the authors of this trops are so focus in make the story complex and making the reader watcher exc want more that they forgot how it all works and how at really gets it message and or story acrossed,I think they use the not answer thing as an excuse,why would they write even more and put effort in writing how it works and what it means,when you can just say "it's up to the readers,watcher exc."
Thank you guys for making content. You are my favourite RUclips channel. I am clinically depressed and your videos are one of the things that keep me excited to be alive. Thank you
I bet the Bookchemist on youtube could make more sense out of this book from a postmodern perspective. You're missing a diagram at the end where Delany goes porn crazy in his newer books, Hogg, etc.
I wonder why is there so many white guys annoyed with the reason of the repost. There is a Brazilian movie (Marighella) where the same kind of guy complained that the main actor was "way too black" compared to the historical figure. Sincerely, whoever relativizes portraying a black person as white has a serious problem. Extra credits are completely right in this. Well done.
Dhalgren was one of the biggest wastes of time I've ever had reading a book. I admired its ability to toy with structure, (I'm always a sucker for any book that is an infinite loop!), but that's about all I liked about it. It sacrificed any sense of theme or metaphor for gratuitous sex scenes, plus Delaney wasn't even able to maintain that crazy-poetic prose that the book opens with. What you get is page after page of boring crap and unnecessarily detailed sex, then you'll get a random-ass paragraph of Herman Melville-level prose, then it's back to boringness and sex. The entire "New Wave of Science Fiction" canon is worthless crap.
Hey guys! This is a reupload of our Samuel R. Delany episode. Several people correctly pointed out that Samuel R. Delany's skin tone in the first version was too light, inadvertently coding him as white. We've corrected the issue here and apologize for the mistake.
Seriously that's the reason for the re-upload
Bruh
You are good you don’t need apologize for that
Seems like not a super big issue, but oh well, y'all make the episodes.
So, what race was he exactly?
Hello
When you're not sure if re-upload or deliberate mimicry of the subject's structure...
to wound the autumnal city.
Re-upload kinda ties in to the themes of his work.
i hope they upload the video again next week
@@johngaete2413 and change it a little more
They reuploaded because they drew delanys skin too light
I'm so confused... Didn't I just watch this like, yesterday?
Yep, they accidentally made Delaney’s skin too light, so they corrected it and reuploaded the video.
Groundhog day!
No you didn't you have scizophenia
I have to appreciate the art done for these episodes, its simple at parts but is till able to convey words and themes nearly perfectly
of all the episodes to have to re-upload because of a mistake it is very ironically funny to me that this episode had to be the one that being said it is a pleasure to rewatch as well
Neat, I didn’t notice the issue with the first upload as quickly as others, but the change does make more sense.
Read it, liked it. Was left with the feeling it was trying to tell me something I just didn't get; but, wasn't willing to wade through it again to see if I could get it.
Thank you for the introduction to Samuel R. Delaney's works. I suggest for anyone trying to get into his work to read Nova and Babel-17, both of these books had scenes ripped straight from Akira, or maybe it was influenced by them?
Both novels significantly pre-date Akira, so I think you mean Akira (1982) ripped off the scenes from Delany's novels Nova (1968) and Babel-17 (1966).
I read and enjoyed Nova. In terms of what inspired it, Delaney has made clear that novel was his version of Moby Dick
I remember _trying_ to read Dhalgren as a nerdy 12-year old and giving up in the second chapter.
Same. I tried again around 17 or so, and finished it.
You didn't miss much.
Hey, I am anticipating a video on Albedo Anthropomorphics and the subculture it is credited for giving birth to.
Misquoted final/initial lines! "I have come to, to wound the autumnal city". (The comma is just to make it clear there's a brief pause as you flip back to the start of the book.)
This completely changes the message since it makes it clear that leaving the city changes your mental state. At first glance that means that entering Bellona also changed it but I don't think that's necessarily true - it might call out to wounded people who then leave after they've been healed in some way.
I wish I could remember where I read this observation so I could give them proper credit.
I thought it was just me.
There is a rather long tradition of magical cities; Atlantis, Ultima Thule, Shangri La, Amber, Dhalgren. Hmm, I suppose there's more.
Laputa, Lemuria, a bunch more:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_lost_lands#Mythological_lands
Hold up reuploaded?
Can yall do an extra history over the First and Second Schleswig wars
WOW so good!
Lord, what a dirge this was.
So this book is like the netflix series dark? it at least sounds similar like the time machine in dark was created because the inventor hat the broken future version of the time machine so he was able to reverse engineer it
so idk go watch dark its a great series and like onbe of the best german productions in the last 10 years and it even got a season 2 like 3 weeks ago
If it so confusing and people can't understand it then why is it SF? Shouldn't it be Fantasy. Fantasy can get away with confusing etc. (Full Disclosure: Apart from Tolkien & Pratchett I don't read Fantasy. And I prefer SF that gives some sort of answer (even if it is implausible). I hate no answers.
Oi oi extra credits could you do an episode on the tale of B17 old 666 who survived a suicide mission whose crew are the most decorated of the USAF
I could not get into Delany. I read both _Dhalgren_ and _Triton._ To me, both of them were boring and hard to read. _Triton_ seemed to be about a self-centered man who went through many changes in body and circumstance, but with all the change about him, he himself remained the same jerk he started out. That may have been the point, but it was a boring one. The one work of his I liked was a short story called _Time Considered as a Helix of Semi-Precious Stones._ It was because I liked that which led me to force myself to finish the two novels.
Love the v it was great
Good of Extra Sci-fi to repost before we all get drafted.
Wait ive been here before
The kid only had one shoe. Time to reupload the video. j/k I don't think "It's good because I don't understand it" is much of a recommendation. It has some sex scenes though.
Is this time travel?
Delany must had been one of Christopher Nolan's favorite author: ruclips.net/video/67e_jl4flpE/видео.html
I didn't saw the video the first time it came out, and I didn't finished it this time XD
It's just, I don't really like the books that gies me brain knobs ^^
Wind noises
Samuel Delany openly supported NAMBLA his entire adult life. I don't need to spend any time with his work.
18th
430th
Wow 6th comment
Why won't these woke people make movies of Delaney's books instead of changing everything. I guess delaney is too woke for the woke.
This book sucks read one piece instead.
Stop making sci-fi episodes I can't keep up there's too much to read!
As a pragmatist, this seems like exactly the kind of thing that makes me think postmodernism is useless, infuriating, pretentious vomit. It's why The Last Jedi was such a mess: when the point of a work is entirely to subvert expectation, it lacks a center, and thus a purpose, and thus a reason for me to care. Extreme relativism is the same as nihilism.
wut lmao
When all viewpoints are considered equal, none of them mean anything anymore. "When everybody's special, no one is."
Fourth
5th, one off
Second
third, just one off
Hold up, did they re-upload this video or am I just tripping?
Both
yeah, same as ruclips.net/video/05lOT2uSBFk/видео.html Dec 31
Both?
Both?
Both.
Both is good.
check pinned comment, they just edited someone
It starts the same, but then it diverges....
"--we came in?"
"Isn't this where--"
The fact that you guys would re-upload the video to fix just a single mistake really deepens my respect for y'all.
K...
Same here :)
Right
What was the mistake?
Weren't we here? Didn't we do this?
Or was this a dream?
Dahlgren explained: the city has somehow crossed into a demiplane shaped like a mobius strip. That's why there is no sense of time.
Kit is familiar to them because he has left the city and returned many times.
Thats so weird i love it
Blimey, I thought I'd been here before! ;)
This book was insane. Made me question my sanity a few times.
I've tried reading this book several times and have put it down in frustration. If that's the definition of literature, give me some readable pulp.
Don't worry, Dhalgren is not "the definition of literature". Take it from someone who's actually read it; it's just a pointless, meandering slog through roughly 700 pages of insanely gratuitous sex scenes and that's about it. If I were you, I wouldn't waste any more time trying to read it.
wait what the heck is going on, Didn't i just watch this video yesterday
edit: İ saw what extra credits write in the comments
When Extra Credits uploads, RUclips grows a few more braincells.
Superbuchi wow! Amazing comment.
Thank you. My respect increases.
I want to see movies based on Sam Delaney's stories !
Is it just me or the second you start watching extra credits/history you just cant stop watching this for like 1 too 4 hours?
Yo that’s rad that you fixed that, representation is important!
Oh by the way DO HITCHIKER’S GUIDE TO THE GALAXY!
I'm sure they'll get to it.
Reading Dhalgren was a spiritual experience for me. I read the audiobook, narrated by Stefan Rudnicki, and I anticipate coming back to the book several more times in the years to come to see just how differently the story feels on subsequent readings. I anticipate it will almost be like the light caught in a chain of prisms, mirrors, lenses; once you look away, or even blink, the whole image has shifted
this sounds like the anime Big O
A piece of crap novel.
The initial confusion is one thing, but how did everyone seem to miss the explanation on the way to ask questions?
I struggled to process that statement more than I would like to admit :P
This is good. I did think he was white, though as a european the physical skin pigment holds more weight to me than heritage when thinking of whether you're black or white. In any case, now i know, thanks.
I would have liked this book if there weren't an uncomfortable graphic sex scene every 20 pages. Horrible smutty book.
I read the book when it first came out I thought it was pretentious and boring
Not amusing, but this reviews sounds like how someone, who hasn't read the book, would write a review of it. It hits on many of the basic ideas that other reviewers have said of the book, while not being at all specific. Half of the review is: here is the 1st and last sentence of the book, now here it is again written together, oh and it's circular, oh here's what Gibson said, then oh it's difficult, then oh kids journey was this and this (so broad as to not say anything specific, because someone who hasn't read this risks outing them self if they try to come up with something specific, just based off of all the other Wikipedia type reviews). Sorry for the negativity, but this review feels very insulting to Delany's art
This was actually my first Delany book, which I first read when I was in High School. It's a very challenging book, yet somehow I found it incredibly engaging. It's an odd mixture of magical realism and proto-cyberpunk that has never been repeated. It's also horny. EXTREMELY horny, in the way only a book written in the mid 70s could have been published.
I spotted the ghost of a James script...
;)
Love the Macho Man reference!
Ugh I love this channel so much
g
Bruh
I see a pattern in these mind warping trops,a lot of the "answers" are not answers,it's usually speculation,ideas,theories and up to the reader,watcher exc. I feel like the authors of this trops are so focus in make the story complex and making the reader watcher exc want more that they forgot how it all works and how at really gets it message and or story acrossed,I think they use the not answer thing as an excuse,why would they write even more and put effort in writing how it works and what it means,when you can just say "it's up to the readers,watcher exc."
This video is a loop, like the story
Have you guys considered doing Dan Simmon's, Hyperion Cantos?
What does dhueso mean? Is that a reference to something?
Nobody understands this book.
But... Why is this sci fi? It looks interesting, but, sci fi?
Why does the intro sound kind of like twilight zone?
Really wish you had done Clifford Simak.
mspaint tells me you now have him as rgb(227,199,180). What was he before?
I figured this video looked all too familiar.
twin peaks s3 is dahlgren of tv series.
Are RUclips subs messing up again, or did we get 2 episodes today?
Dang, now I want to see the original...
Good to have this back up.
You guys need to do an episode on Borges, please!
First
First
When you're so early there's not much comments to read
An interesting story I hope to read it sometime soon. It seems like an interesting setting.
15th
This book still sounds like hot garbage
Thank you guys for making content. You are my favourite RUclips channel. I am clinically depressed and your videos are one of the things that keep me excited to be alive. Thank you
I bet the Bookchemist on youtube could make more sense out of this book from a postmodern perspective. You're missing a diagram at the end where Delany goes porn crazy in his newer books, Hogg, etc.
Technically Hogg was one of his first books
I wonder why is there so many white guys annoyed with the reason of the repost. There is a Brazilian movie (Marighella) where the same kind of guy complained that the main actor was "way too black" compared to the historical figure. Sincerely, whoever relativizes portraying a black person as white has a serious problem. Extra credits are completely right in this. Well done.
Because so many yt people are used to being the center of the world. Its bullshit. Not everyone is as pale as a ghost.
2 extra sci -fi videos in one day? Wow guys! This season is awesome!
4th
you are actually the first
Dhalgren was one of the biggest wastes of time I've ever had reading a book. I admired its ability to toy with structure, (I'm always a sucker for any book that is an infinite loop!), but that's about all I liked about it. It sacrificed any sense of theme or metaphor for gratuitous sex scenes, plus Delaney wasn't even able to maintain that crazy-poetic prose that the book opens with. What you get is page after page of boring crap and unnecessarily detailed sex, then you'll get a random-ass paragraph of Herman Melville-level prose, then it's back to boringness and sex. The entire "New Wave of Science Fiction" canon is worthless crap.