@jimbobhaha got to back to the ot for definitions of words. The white jews changed the word yahuah to lord . 9 x out of ten in the ot lord is yahuah the father.
@@jimbobhaha also yeshua said he is the master of masters . That makes him the father cause yahuah said the same thing. Lord can mean master sometimes. But still means yah is master . That word is authortive.
For those who are saying that Son is actually Almighty Father Himself!!! The Almighty Father, planed and prophesied for Himself to send Himself to Earth as His own Son: agreeing with Himself, He volunteered Himself to Himself, to offer Himself in obedience to Himself. Then He impregnated a woman with Himself, in order to become His Son, who was really just Himself, who prayed to Himself and begged Himself, to not let this happen to Himself, before finally forsaking Himself and obeying Himself unto death to prove loyalty to Himself. While Dead, He resurrected Himself, so that He could return to Himself, to sit at His own right hand, and to serve as a mediator, between mankind and Himself. And finally when Satan’s forces are defeated, He will turn His kingdom back over to Himself, ruling only with Himself forever. Hello, wake up people!!!!
Thank you for sharing this, brother. I was raised oneness Apostolic pentecostal. I am so grateful for the truth. His Word is not confusing when we understand Deutermony 18:15 -19, Matthew 16:13 -20. When I was coming to understanding of the Father and Son being two but one in agreement. I read and meditated on these scriptures . When we pray for His truth, LOOK out and plan on everything that you've thought was right to be turned up side down and shaken. We serve a merciful Father that wants us to know Him and His precious Son.
Good morning brother Matthew. Shabbat Shalom 🕊 I admire how you ask your question and do not argue, letting the text speak. This idea is so deep rooted, I've recently been learning it goes back to founding church fathers (Greek philosophy) and the church disagreeing about our Father and his Son. Constantine wanted agreement (council of Nicea)sp? .... it is all still of man trying to pigeonhole our Father and our Messiah... to me it just looks like arrogance and pride.
Thank you, brother, Matthew! I hope anyone watching this would just go look up definitions of words. And Hebrew is an interesting language. The word, Elohim is not plural. There are many many places in scripture where that word is used to describe not only the most high, but also the angels and the bad angels and the false gods It's not an honest way to look at the scripture as brother Matthew. You said that there are what we think in English should absolutely apply to a Hebrew language that we know nothing about. And that the modern Hebrew isn't even the same language. This is absolutely him using the hermeneutic of finding a few instances where he thinks it's saying something plural and then disregarding every single one that's saying absolute singular. This is a tough tough crowd. The Trinitarians. God bless you, brother.
I would love to see a debate on the Holy Spirit the Hebrew word RUAH Is feminine. what do you do with that? Since all the Bibles translated it into masculine and calls it He But in the Hebrew it’s feminine.
Shalom brother Matthew, I found your page recently through brother Lucas’ channel 7Trumpetsprepper & the scriptural sabbath summit you were a part about 10 months ago. I’ve recently been led to this issue about whether or not Messiah is YAH & there’s just two questions I have for you which I’m hoping you wouldn’t mind answering to help me. 1. How would you reconcile John 1:1 “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” (with the scripture) “For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.” - 1 John 5:7. If Messiah is the Word as per 1 John 5:7 & the Word was God as per John 1:1, I’m just curious as to what your response would be as to why that means he isn’t God? 2. In the scripture “I, even I, am the Lord; and beside me there is no saviour.” - Isaiah 43:1, YAH clearly states that he is our saviour & no other. If YAH & Messiah are 2 different people & Messiah is our salvation as per 1 John 4:14, doesn’t that contradict this scripture where The Most High says he alone is salvation? What’s interesting is I’ve actually seen both sides use this scripture to support their doctrine so I would sincerely appreciate your perspective. I understand how important this subject is as if Messiah is YAH & one denys that they are effectively rejecting The Most High himself. And likewise if he isn’t YAH & one recognises him as such they are committing idolatry & breaking the first commandment. To me this issue is so serious & actually salvational. I can see this is a topic of major divide at the moment even among Torah observant believers. I personally am not sure where I stand on this right now as those I follow & trust (yourself being one of them) are basically split right down the middle. I’ve listened to the entire debate & will most certainly go back to re listen. I feel Yah has drawn me to this subject in the last week or two & when you suggested in that discussion that you recommend everyone takes a serious period to study the scriptures I felt like The Most High was speaking to me in the spirit so that is something I will have to do & appreciate you saying that. Anyway if you have the time to respond to this & share your perspective with me regarding these questions I would be most grateful & may help me come to a greater understanding of the truth. May Yah Baruch you & yours brother.
the fact that there are both singular and plural is what you would exspect if the single God had plurality. i dont see a trinity but certainly the image is male and female , two that are truly one
Yeshu'a Ha'Rishon of the line of the Kings (David threw Joseph), of the line of the Prophets (Heli from Nathan), and of the line of the Priests (Mryam's father from Tzadok)
Most don't understand what the New Covenant is all about which is "GOD IN YOU" teaching you By His Spirit, NOT man teaching you. (Isaiah 54:13) (John 6:45) (John 14:26) (1st John 2:27). TRUTH ONLY COMES "Out of the Mouth" of God By His Spirit, (Deut. 8:3) (Pro. 1:23), so if you have "learned" from man, then it is NOT TRUTH !!
Just because Jesus the son was with GOD since the begining doesnt make them one. Plural means two. Not one. Jesus is the son. GOD is the only one true GOD. Amen
Men just complicate the scriptures, add to it and take away. Even a child could understand it. Yah came in the flesh. Period and to declare yeshua isn't yah in the flesh is a sin. And is idolatry. It allows the devil to create a new elohim that isn't the el of the ot
![[Bible Study] How to Become Part of Jesus' Genealogy?](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LexgQjRphG4/mqdefault.jpg)
In all the years that I’ve been in the Hebrew Roots Walk, I’ve never found a teacher that I can agree with more then Matthew.
1 cor. 12:3 from a Hebrew perspective says that if you can't say that yeshua is yahuah the father, you do not have the ruach
@@bro.reuben2518
I read your suggested verse.
Please explain how 1 Cor 12:3 means what you say it means.
@jimbobhaha got to back to the ot for definitions of words. The white jews changed the word yahuah to lord .
9 x out of ten in the ot lord is yahuah the father.
@@jimbobhaha also yeshua said he is the master of masters . That makes him the father cause yahuah said the same thing. Lord can mean master sometimes. But still means yah is master . That word is authortive.
@@jimbobhaha if you look at 12:3 in the Greek, kurios is capitalized as well.
Good morning brother Matthew, thanks for sharing this. Shalom
For those who are saying that Son is actually Almighty Father Himself!!!
The Almighty Father, planed and prophesied for Himself to send Himself to Earth as His own Son: agreeing with Himself, He volunteered Himself to Himself, to offer Himself in obedience to Himself. Then He impregnated a woman with Himself, in order to become His Son, who was really just Himself, who prayed to Himself and begged Himself, to not let this happen to Himself, before finally forsaking Himself and obeying Himself unto death to prove loyalty to Himself. While Dead, He resurrected Himself, so that He could return to Himself, to sit at His own right hand, and to serve as a mediator, between mankind and Himself. And finally when Satan’s forces are defeated, He will turn His kingdom back over to Himself, ruling only with Himself forever. Hello, wake up people!!!!
Thank you for sharing this, brother. I was raised oneness Apostolic pentecostal. I am so grateful for the truth. His Word is not confusing when we understand Deutermony 18:15 -19, Matthew 16:13 -20. When I was coming to understanding of the Father and Son being two but one in agreement. I read and meditated on these scriptures . When we pray for His truth, LOOK out and plan on everything that you've thought was right to be turned up side down and shaken. We serve a merciful Father that wants us to know Him and His precious Son.
Good morning brother Matthew. Shabbat Shalom 🕊 I admire how you ask your question and do not argue, letting the text speak.
This idea is so deep rooted, I've recently been learning it goes back to founding church fathers (Greek philosophy) and the church disagreeing about our Father and his Son. Constantine wanted agreement (council of Nicea)sp? .... it is all still of man trying to pigeonhole our Father and our Messiah... to me it just looks like arrogance and pride.
❤Truthunedited
Thank you, brother, Matthew! I hope anyone watching this would just go look up definitions of words. And Hebrew is an interesting language.
The word, Elohim is not plural.
There are many many places in scripture where that word is used to describe not only the most high, but also the angels and the bad angels and the false gods
It's not an honest way to look at the scripture as brother Matthew. You said that there are what we think in English should absolutely apply to a Hebrew language that we know nothing about.
And that the modern Hebrew isn't even the same language.
This is absolutely him using the hermeneutic of finding a few instances where he thinks it's saying something plural and then disregarding every single one that's saying absolute singular.
This is a tough tough crowd. The Trinitarians.
God bless you, brother.
The word "godhead" isn't found anywhere in the tanakh,the gospel.thats a man made term for a man made doctrine
Wow! Matthew Janzen is such a learned brother in the Messiah. This is why he's a pastor and teacher. ❤
I am the vine, you are the branches. He who abides in Me, and I in him, bears much fruit; for without Me you can do nothing.
Job 38 verse 1 to 7. The angels was with God when he created everything
I would love to see a debate on the Holy Spirit the Hebrew word RUAH Is feminine. what do you do with that? Since all the Bibles translated it into masculine and calls it He But in the Hebrew it’s feminine.
Minute mark 19:58…”John 1:3”….Ken H from hanging on his words, has a great video “did Jesus really create all things”
The verse in isaiah about the everlasting father is NoT in the Septuagint
Ty brother Matthew. I am still befuddled because he said he differs from you and don’t think the father is
Conniving . I’m still shaking my head
Shalom brother Matthew,
I found your page recently through brother Lucas’ channel 7Trumpetsprepper & the scriptural sabbath summit you were a part about 10 months ago. I’ve recently been led to this issue about whether or not Messiah is YAH & there’s just two questions I have for you which I’m hoping you wouldn’t mind answering to help me.
1. How would you reconcile John 1:1 “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” (with the scripture) “For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.” - 1 John 5:7.
If Messiah is the Word as per 1 John 5:7 & the Word was God as per John 1:1, I’m just curious as to what your response would be as to why that means he isn’t God?
2. In the scripture “I, even I, am the Lord; and beside me there is no saviour.” - Isaiah 43:1, YAH clearly states that he is our saviour & no other. If YAH & Messiah are 2 different people & Messiah is our salvation as per 1 John 4:14, doesn’t that contradict this scripture where The Most High says he alone is salvation? What’s interesting is I’ve actually seen both sides use this scripture to support their doctrine so I would sincerely appreciate your perspective.
I understand how important this subject is as if Messiah is YAH & one denys that they are effectively rejecting The Most High himself. And likewise if he isn’t YAH & one recognises him as such they are committing idolatry & breaking the first commandment. To me this issue is so serious & actually salvational. I can see this is a topic of major divide at the moment even among Torah observant believers. I personally am not sure where I stand on this right now as those I follow & trust (yourself being one of them) are basically split right down the middle.
I’ve listened to the entire debate & will most certainly go back to re listen. I feel Yah has drawn me to this subject in the last week or two & when you suggested in that discussion that you recommend everyone takes a serious period to study the scriptures I felt like The Most High was speaking to me in the spirit so that is something I will have to do & appreciate you saying that. Anyway if you have the time to respond to this & share your perspective with me regarding these questions I would be most grateful & may help me come to a greater understanding of the truth. May Yah Baruch you & yours brother.
1 john 5 7 is translated wrong. Added by the roman cathlic church I'm sure. Look into the original greek.
the fact that there are both singular and plural is what you would exspect if the single God had plurality. i dont see a trinity but certainly the image is male and female , two that are truly one
what is His name or the name of His Son, Holy Ones
Yeshu'a Ha'Rishon of the line of the Kings (David threw Joseph), of the line of the Prophets (Heli from Nathan), and of the line of the Priests (Mryam's father from Tzadok)
but the context of proverbs is the father and son
Most don't understand what the New Covenant is all about which is "GOD IN YOU" teaching you By His Spirit, NOT man teaching you. (Isaiah 54:13) (John 6:45) (John 14:26) (1st John 2:27). TRUTH ONLY COMES "Out of the Mouth" of God By His Spirit, (Deut. 8:3) (Pro. 1:23), so if you have "learned" from man, then it is NOT TRUTH !!
Yeshua is Wisdom
Just because Jesus the son was with GOD since the begining doesnt make them one. Plural means two. Not one. Jesus is the son. GOD is the only one true GOD. Amen
Men just complicate the scriptures, add to it and take away. Even a child could understand it. Yah came in the flesh. Period and to declare yeshua isn't yah in the flesh is a sin. And is idolatry. It allows the devil to create a new elohim that isn't the el of the ot
Hell no
So sad lost man in a cult of old testament
Yeah, it's rough imitating our Messiah. 😉
Satan teaches the Old T. isn't Scripture today....... Jesus Matthew 4:4 and Paul 2 Timothy 3:16 teach the Old. T. IS still Scripture for us today.
@BillH-l3c I know the Old Testament of scripture.I love the old testament we don't live in the old testament
@justinbutcher44 You're not imitating jesus by living in the old testament
@@Joebob23-x4q what behaviors did Jesus undertake to please the Father?