The Askar SQA55 is a small Petzval design astrograph that gets amazing star shapes across a full frame sensor... AND offers great mechanical and quality of life features on the scope itself. Let's look at the details! My Patreon: www.patreon.com/cuivlazygeek My Merch Store: cuiv.myspreadshop.com/ For any affiliate link purchases, make sure to accept cookies if prompted! Also, browser plugin "Honey" may steal commissions from creators if you interact with it (even just clicking on "OK" to the "No coupons found" message)! Get the Askar SQA55: bit.ly/4hEfW7l (Agena) or bit.ly/48u4PJC (HPS) or tinyurl.com/24mek4vc (FLO) or tinyurl.com/5yw5ccrd (All Star Telescope) An alternative is the SVBony SV555: bit.ly/3UWR0Os (use coupon cuiv20 for a further discount), and review here: ruclips.net/video/K0xrhftRYvU/видео.html Universal Focus Mask: tinyurl.com/p97bb3ub Cameras used for testing: ZWO ASI2600MC Air smart camera: tinyurl.com/tr2r3esn (ZWO) or bit.ly/3SV04Co (Agena,) or bit.ly/3SZARXx (HPS) Touptek SkyEye 24AC: tinyurl.com/yjwd836e Amazon affiliate: amzn.to/49XTx01 Agena affiliate: bit.ly/3Om0hNG High Point Scientific affiliate: bit.ly/3lReu8R First Light Optics affiliate: tinyurl.com/yxd2jkr2 All-Star Telescope affiliate: bit.ly/3SCgVbV Astroshop eu Affiliate: tinyurl.com/2vafkax8
Thank you for this amazing video... can you do a video comparing side by side a takahashi and its equivalent scope ( babyQ 85 / 106ED takahashi) and that way see if the extra money worth it??? Thank you in advance.
@@CuivTheLazyGeek of course hahaha, is that true that in japan is cheaper to buy a Tak ?? If so maybe i need to go to japan and get one tak and do a review. hahaha
I'm so happy as an SQA55 owner....I did my own research before buying as was thinking about the cats, but after comparing went with the Askar...now all the reviews are coming in confirming I made the correct choice! I have not had a chance to use it under the stars because of lousy weather, but I can't wait to get it out - thanks Cuiv I learn a lot from watching your reviews, which has helped me make a good choice here.
This may be the most time-effective review I have ever seen on RUclips since the first 10 seconds say it all 😁 Great review, as always! Thanks for putting the time to do the research and produce this video. I am trying to get my hands on the SQA85 to compare it with the Takahashi FSQ85. Let’s see… Askar does make very compelling products (I am very happy with my 151PHQ!) またね
It’s really nice to see that anyone can take a nice scope out of the box and get such great results. The hobby is hard enough and taking the optics out of the equation makes for a pleasant experience.
Askar thought this one out. I bought it about 8 weeks ago, but not just for Astro when camping. The fact that it can be used for terrestrial photography is a bonus. I do like that Askar threaded the front for camera filters which means I do not have to get a second Bahtinov Mask.
I am using the Askar 180 Pro, which has similar features and quality. It’s the perfect travel AP scope. The people at Askar really know what they’re doing.
It’s on my list as the top choice for my first wide field “telescope” as a first step for moving up from my mirrorless setup Thanks for the review! Very helpful
Great review. I was so impressed with this little refractor that I ordered one (got to see your review early with my patreon contribution :) ). It arrived two days ago as well as the complementary clouds that come with all new scopes. Really am excited about the nice flat fields and I am a huge fan of Petzval design scopes.
I hope they sent you SQA 106 as well. It looks to have better stars at the edge of the Medium Format camera, than most scopes have in the middle, which is kinda nuts. Oh, and great review Cuiv, thanks for the amazing work!
While you are at it, we would also like a review of the SQA 85. Not much on RUclips so far but everyone has them in stock. I'm guessing Askar has not sent them to the usual reviewers and it makes me wonder why they haven't especially when the price is taken into account.
Great review so yeah, I bought it with EAF attachment (off your affiliate link, of course). I've been shooting at 360 mm but I needed something in this focal range and as a Petzval with marked camera rotator it is perfect! TY!
Thanks Cuiv, this is great! I now have a solid recommendation for when anyone asks for a good widefield scope. I'm also considering it as a nice travel scope!
If you put a bright star in the corner, using an APS-c sensor, the image shows some aberration (faint cut-outs in the star shape, caused by aperture vignetting). For Astro work, it’s best to tape up the aperture ring, since it can be inadvertently moved (been there, done that, got the (unwanted) starburst effect) The fine focus ring has 1/10 the sensitivity of the coarse focus ring. Overall results are very good. Use 2x drizzle with BlurXterminator and the results are outstanding, revealing excellent detail across the whole field.
I'm not trying to be a argumentative jerk here, just sharing what I have learned from evaluating optics for 50 years, i.e. my thoughts, for what they're worth....for your interest, especially if you are relatively new to astronomy.... No, it isn't perfect. For starters, as is the case with all Askar optics, there is noticeable chromatic aberration, even in the APC sensor. This indicates either a very poor design, or more likely given Askar never reveals the glass they use, they use cheaper quality glass than most manufacturers. FYI, not only does that mean that the colour correction is not optimal, but it makes me wonder if the homogeneity of the glass is sub-standard (which will affect things like opacity of the glass), if the coatings are on all surfaces, and if the coatings suppress reflections over the entire spectrum that CMOS sensors can detect. (..in fact, it is possible that some of what looks like chromatic aberration is actually internal reflections in the deep red/near IR and/or violet/near UV ends of the spectrum..) Also, as Cuiv pointed out, his test with the full-frame camera was not very discerning, because the pixels are 6um wide, versus 3.76um in the APC camera he used,. I seriously suspect that testing with an ASI6200MM Pro or other camera with 3.76um pixels would reveal even more issues near the sizes & corners of the frame. Having said that....while any aberrations, poor colour correction, lower than optimal opacity, and internal reflections do reduce contrast & increase the true f-ratio...it is pretty clear that the lens does produce very good results that are more than sufficient for the vast majority of imagers, especially if they factor in the enticing price. Cheers, Derek
I had to choose between the Sharpstar 61edph iii and the Askar FRA300. I went for the faster optics of the 61edph iii, but something like the SQA55 seems like a great upgrade in the future. I really can't do the belt EAF system as I pack my gear in a backpack, but hopefully we see something similar with a different focuser in the future. It's also great that Askar/Sharpstar is really dropping the price point for great optics. I haven't seen price adjustments yet from other manufacturers, but if they want to stay competitive they're really going to need to make some changes. Although the optical quality isn't on the level of the SQA series, I still can't believe you can get a solid 140mm triplet from Sharpstar for the same price as a 120mm ED doublet from Skywatcher. It's a great time to be in the hobby.
I really like Askar optics, my first real scope was the FRA300 and I don't think it's as good, but still excellent, it just works. As far as this lens goes, awesome, but I'll stick with my Roki 135 for now. :) Thanks for the review.
I got this scope the minute it came out and it's been amazing. While I'm planning to add the EAF kit, I was surprised to see it held focus over multiple nights. So I agree, the only annoying thing is the case. For asiair users, I screw the air under the front part of the dovetail.
Great review. I just purchased the Askar SQA55 using the Agena affiliate link. I’ve been using Canon 300mm f/4 L for wide field, which has worked out very well, even with the 2X teleconverter, but using a proper telescope will be more convenient. I plan to get a EAF to use with it.
I'll definitely have to put this one on the list to look into in the future when I want another scope (I already feel the bug getting me with that). and don't worry Cuiv, totally didn't notice the back piece of the scope fall off at 6:56, nope... totally haven't done that exact same thing with the FMA 180 PRO a dozen times already lol..
Excellent tool, I can't wait for the weather to run my baby SharpStar 50 EDPH under the sky. Today I received a normal reducer from the company instead of a defective one. Of course, I don't expect the same impressive result in the frame field, but at least I hope for a better result than the previous one.
@@sjpp71 The locking ring that holds the entire lens assembly in place was not tightened in the reducer at the factory, ))) And the front lens of the reducer fell inside the telescope tube, it’s good that I was holding the telescope horizontally at that moment.
@@JVRost Ugh, sorry you went through that, probably not common but definitely not a good look for their quality control... I was getting ridiculous coma at the corners but then realised the backfocus is 55mm from the base of the M48 thread, I was counting from the surface of the FF!
I am absolutely blown away by mine! It's def taken my astrophotography to the next level with pinpoint stars. I am bit bummed I cannot find an additional quick release handle for my asiair using a guide scope😔 No crazy gripes tho
@astro_shooter76 I found a solution. Did some sleuthing after watching lukomatico's review on it and his mounting solutions. He Placed two Altair keystone riser blocks between two additional Askar LDP 300 universal dovetails. It allows you to place all asiair etc under the scope while using a guide scope. A lot more money, but a solution nontheless.
@@astro_shooter76 If you see tons of comments, please ignore. My response keeps disappearing on my end. 2 askar LSP300 dovetails sandwiched between 2 Altair keystone riser blocks works. Look at lukomatico's review. Allows you to place everything inside the makeshift "cage" below the scope.
@@astro_shooter76 I found a solution using two askaar ldp300 dovetails sandwiched between two ataiir keystone riser blocks. Watch LucoMatico review to get a visual
Yes I ordered a SV555 as well, the price is unbeatable and even got a guide scope and dew heater as the same price as the scope alone, couldn't say no. Will be an awesome portable setup.
Wow these reviews of the askar lens are coming fast and furious. They have changed my mind and i will not choose the recat 51 as my entry lens into the hoby. Thanks for the content!!
You should also consider Sharpstar EDPHiii with 1.0x flattener. I got it for just over 4000CNY and the stars and star shapes are amazing. Friend has Takahashi of the same focal length and mine beats his fair and square, it leaves it miles behind. I have 8HD and I wanted something wider and this small scope brought me back into the hobby when I was losing motivation. There is no wonder why Trevor has chosen it as a base for his signature scope and put his name on it.
Well after space koala's review and this one from you, Cuiv, I really want one. The only problem is that I have too many other combinations to get the same field of view with a Canon rp and other astro cameras with different lens and telescope combinations... 😢 Might need to sell some stuff if these sqa55's continue to get good reviews. 👍👍
When you demonstrated the real world results, and you were praising the circular stars in each side of the frame, why does the empty regions of space look green and red instead of black? Is that normal? I understand that the center star is glowing and lighting up the surrounding space. Is there a name for this green and red appearance? And would it look the same with the naked eye? Very interesting. A cool review video.
If this was out when I was considering a redcat years ago, this would be the clear winner. And now I'm just trying not to spend all my money :) Great review!
Hi Cuiv, thank you for another awesome video! In Australia, ASKAR SQA55 is $1300, the SVBONY SV555 is $800. Is Askar worth extra $500? I was thinking of getting Askar but $500 extra is kinda a lot. Cheers mate
I recently watched some videos that tested camera lenses for astrophotography, and wow, I had no idea how bad the images were even on lenses that cost many times what this lens does. $1800 lenses with coma, astigmatism, chromatic abberation, and field curvature - unbelievable.
Yeah camera lenses can be anything. It's crazy. It almost feels like a scam. Worst of it all is that they can do an excellent job, if they want to. I own an Canon 32mm f1.4 for the discontinued ef-m mount which is awesome. Sharp and clean, even wide open. It is even better than much more expensive lenses
Hello Cuiv, great review. Seeing so many viable options pop up regularly in the market is nice. Going back to your video where a small Newtonian is compared to a small refractor, I have a question: how do you believe this SQA55 would compare to, let's say, an Apertura Carbonstar 150, which falls in the same price bracket? Thanks
Hi Cuiv, another great review. Looks to be a great piece of kit but I wont be buying one. I don't doubt its performance but I think the small refractor end of the market is pretty saturated at the moment. At the end of the day this is still more or less an f5 scope. On the few nights a month that I can image from where I live, it is rare that the sky is clear enough to image for more than about three hours a night, with an f5 scope it can take up to to two months to capture enough data to produce a reasonably noise free image, so in my case my next scope will have to be something a lot faster, I'm beginning to think that something like a C8 with a hyperstar might actually be a better fit for my own circumstances, I just wish there was more competition at this end of the market.
@@CuivTheLazyGeek Thanks Cuiv, It was actually Luke's video that gave me the idea for the Hyperstar. I will revisit some of your Newtonian videos though. Clear skies.
Anyone wanna buy my redcat 51? I think I'm sold on this for my portable setup! Hopefully the SQA106 performs as well, or better, than this little gem! Thanks Cuiv, again, for another fantastic review.
I own one and they are fantastic. I REALLY wish they offered an additional guide scope mount which could be used to mount a mini PC. Unfortunately, they don't
@@CuivTheLazyGeek Thank You!! I did the same a while back, I'm hoping others have asked as well. It truly is an awesome scope ! I designed and printed a few parts for it. A front support mount to stop the flexing, and a small adapter to allow mounting a mini guide scope dovetail on one of the side mounts. If anyone is in need search Thingiverse for Askar SQA55 and you should find the 3 items I created.
What do you think about the Askar FMA180 (not pro)? It is a tiny (40 mm aperture) triplet apo and comes with a full-frame flattener/reducer. Without that, the telescope can be used with a star diagonal and eyepiece, or a 45-degrees Amici prism and eyepiece, or a Herschel wedge and eyepiece (or camera). It seems to be very versatile.
Thanks for another great review. It looks like the vignetting on the full frame is very different from left corners to right corners. Is that something to worry about?
Great review !! So if you have to decide between the SV555 and the SQA55, with one will you chose ? wich one have more value for money ? Thank you so much !
Very convincing...good work. But a noob question: I have a 300mm Nikon f4 lens (prime) that I use with Z6 (full frame). Why do i need this instead? I mean what benefit do i get (practical)? I am just starting out in Astro-Photo, just got my GTi mount. Just waiting for full moon to go away to try out.
If you get good enough stars with your Nikon F4 lens, no need to changed! Typically F4 primes will need to be closed to around F5.6 to have acceptable star shapes (and thus sharpness) across the field, but there is lens lottery!
Hi Cuiv. Awesome as always. So one weird question. Sorry if this is a dumb question. I understand the Askar SQA55 Quintuplet does not require a field flattener. However, could it still be used with a reducer? If so, do you know of any reducers that might work with it?
Thanks as always Cuiv! Different scopes, obviously, but how much better (or worse) does it perform against the Askar V with the 60mm reducer, giving about the same focal length?
Excellent test, thank you! I have an SQA55 as well but I’m not seeing anywhere near the level of vignetting you are showing. I see just a minor level of vignetting more in keeping with Askar’s promised specs on field illumination, which claims only a 10% falloff at the corners of a full-frame sensor. You are showing much worse vignetting even on a cropped frame camera, and uneven with the right side much darker than the left. As it is, your results are contrary to Askar’s promised performance, and any difference between promised and actual performance is just what a review should point out. So what might be the explanation of the vignetting you show? It can’t be just sky gradients from your urban site? It would be “enlightening” to find out! Thanks! I enjoy your reviews as they are always thorough and cover products we often don’t hear about in North America.
Remember that I'm using auto stretch! Different levels of auto stretch will show different levels of vignetting, and exaggerate differences, it's a map transfer function (so you can't say anything conclusive from this video - tbh I never consider vignetting to be much of an issue for me) The proper way of measuring would be to use flat frames and look at the pixel values - I'll do that for my next scope review!
It seems to outperform the Redcat 51 which is already an exceptional little scope. Now, here is a difficult question: Would you sell a Redcat 51 to get yourself the SQA55?
Cuiv, Don’t know if you watch comments on older videos, but I received the Askar SQA55 purchased from your link, and it’s defective. I can’t say I’ve received much defective product from Agena, but it is disappointing nonetheless. The SQA55 shoe that the dovetail bracket goes into is loose with no apparent way to tighten it. It must be from the inside. And best I can tell, there is no easy way to open this telescope. There are 4 of these attachment points on the lens and 2 of them are loose, one very loose which is used for the mount dovetail. Hard to see how this escaped QA. I’ve contacted Agena for an RMA and they want to contact ASKAR. So it’s all turning into a long protracted mess. It’s what I get for being an early adopter. Oh well not your fault, but sometimes Females get this kind of treatment from astronomy and photography vendors (many times 2nd hand returns are pawned off on us, and then the doubt when an issue is reported and then the long run-around to resolve things).
Hi Cuiv, Did the guiding sensor on the ZWO2600Air work well with the M48 connector? That is, you did not need an M54 connector for the guiding sensor to get enough light? Thanks for the review!
Let us take a moment and honor the pixel peepers among us. I credit this often maligned group of people with encouraging telescope makers to address poor corner stars.. which have plagued us for years. The competition is heating up. I don't think telling folks to rely on software to fix corner stars is going to cut it :)
Hi Cuiv, As Always very grateful for your videos. Quick Question: It's older brother the ACL200 has an odd quirk in that the entire front of the telescope (lens) moves when you (coarse) focus. (I did not realize till I made a triple scope setup and made a bracket to hold the front of the scopes together. My painful lesson ;) ) Is it the same with the SQA55 (it's hard to notice if you're not looking for it) Thx!
I was wondering if you think that the case could conceivably be modified if one was to install an EAF? I understand that with the standard foam and OTA orientation there isn’t physical room for the EAF. Is the interior foam removable from the outer case? If the OTA turned on its side and the foam was fully replaced, would everything fit in your opinion? Just curious. BTW - love your channel!
At this point, with what we have, I don't think it's economically efficient to buy a doublet or even a triplet in this size (50-60mm). Just get this, or someone on a budget, get the Svbony SV555. Don't bother with doublets and triplets and mess around with backfocus issues, and still dealing with F5.9 (at best), while these scopes are a full F stop faster! Not to mention the hidden cost of the flattener. Now I feel like, getting a full frame camera starts to make sense😊 , it's just my bank acct. that went on strike. 🙄
Hi Cuiv, another great review and based on what you said previously, I'm going to do something I don't usually do and that's buy a telescope based on a youtube review. I usually take a while and multiple data sources to make decisions as it's still in my DNA being a retired engineer. But based on the fact that dingdong running the country next year is at least threatening tariffs, which means price increases, and I've needed a wide field imaging scope for some time, I ordered one through your channel. If it doesn't work out you'll be the first to know :)
Oh wow! I really hope it works out! For now, it does look like reports from the wild are very positive - and you're right, with looming tariffs, the time to stock up is now...
Thanks for the review. Theoretically, if the SQA106 would be the same, would it be better or worse than an FSQ106EDX4? Or is the FSQ still in it's own class?
@@blufferblue1599 that is exactly what I thought. The thing is, I do not see any of these chromatic abberations on any of my Tak pictures. Hence my question. Always on the hunt if something better is out there. But in this case I fail to properly understand it yet.
OMG I am going to have to reprocess ALL of my photos from the last couple years. I was watching you check the edges of the image for star shapes and you kept saying (almost disappointedly) saying "perfectly round" And I'm thinking to myself, aren't they a little oblong? THEN I PUT MY GLASSES ON. Sheesh... I've been throwing out perfectly good frames (I'm new to glasses BTW, but I've needed them for a couple years at least) Great review. I already have the RedCat so.... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I had the EDPH II (the one Trevor's scope was based on) which is completely different from the EDPH III! I've actually never tested the III, so I can't say much about it. The II obviously had the horrendous CA issue I had found, but that was fixed by a free objective lens exchange program, but otherwise was a good little scope!
I really don't understand this "trend" of making dual telescope/camera lens things. You can get much better telephoto lenses for you DLSR with all the other features of a good DSLR matched lens. So, why overcomplicate a telescope with adjustable aperture?
Honestly not sure, but it doesn't really bother me - the EAF attachment I purchased is excellent too - still used as a lens I think it would be superior to telephoto lenses (even prime ones) in terms of pure image sharpness. Would be interesting to get "real" photographer opinions after using it
What would you recommend for wide field but for smaller sensor size - I don't need APS-C - just basic sensor and fast scope? I've read about EvoGuide 50 + flatner but it seems to have problematic focuser with huge backlash.
Very nice scope. But, the choice of a helical focuser is kind of unfortunate (as well as the aperture adjustment ring; although you can just leave that open). I understand they were going for a telescope/camera lens combo, but I have a hard time seeing its usefulness. Even William Optics moved away from this concept. Otherwise, it is an excellent telescope.
Since filming the video, I negotiated to buy my sample, and also bought the EAF kit - it works beautifully and the belt tensioner is excellent, so while I agree that I prefer R&P type focusers, this helical focuser doesn't bother me at all in the end!
@@CuivTheLazyGeek you're completely right. It is not a deal killer by any means, more like a minor hindrance. :) But, say what you will about WO (I am not a huge fan myself), their internal focuser is quite nice. I would be all over an SQA55-II with a similar internal focuser, no aperture adjustment, and perhaps a little bigger image circle to cut down on that pesky vignetting (even though it is easily correctable).
I choose to purchase this scope over the new redcat 51 gen 3 do to the flat field and sharp stars seen on the edges especially in this price range. Some of the images on astrobin with no post processing are very impressive. My askar sqa55 is on its way. I do have a question though. Did you find any walking noise/raining noise in your tests or did you dither enough to not have an issues. Thanks again for all the great content!
Yes but a direct comparison with the little svbony would have been nicer ...the redcat was a lost battle already..btw since you are there a visit to starbase would be ideal with the direct prices they have there 😬
The Askar SQA55 is a small Petzval design astrograph that gets amazing star shapes across a full frame sensor... AND offers great mechanical and quality of life features on the scope itself. Let's look at the details!
My Patreon: www.patreon.com/cuivlazygeek
My Merch Store: cuiv.myspreadshop.com/
For any affiliate link purchases, make sure to accept cookies if prompted! Also, browser plugin "Honey" may steal commissions from creators if you interact with it (even just clicking on "OK" to the "No coupons found" message)!
Get the Askar SQA55: bit.ly/4hEfW7l (Agena) or bit.ly/48u4PJC (HPS) or tinyurl.com/24mek4vc (FLO) or tinyurl.com/5yw5ccrd (All Star Telescope)
An alternative is the SVBony SV555: bit.ly/3UWR0Os (use coupon cuiv20 for a further discount), and review here: ruclips.net/video/K0xrhftRYvU/видео.html
Universal Focus Mask: tinyurl.com/p97bb3ub
Cameras used for testing:
ZWO ASI2600MC Air smart camera: tinyurl.com/tr2r3esn (ZWO) or bit.ly/3SV04Co (Agena,) or bit.ly/3SZARXx (HPS)
Touptek SkyEye 24AC: tinyurl.com/yjwd836e
Amazon affiliate: amzn.to/49XTx01
Agena affiliate: bit.ly/3Om0hNG
High Point Scientific affiliate: bit.ly/3lReu8R
First Light Optics affiliate: tinyurl.com/yxd2jkr2
All-Star Telescope affiliate: bit.ly/3SCgVbV
Astroshop eu Affiliate: tinyurl.com/2vafkax8
Thank you for this amazing video... can you do a video comparing side by side a takahashi and its equivalent scope ( babyQ 85 / 106ED takahashi) and that way see if the extra money worth it??? Thank you in advance.
@@DanielMercado-d5y if I get access to a Tak!
@@CuivTheLazyGeek of course hahaha, is that true that in japan is cheaper to buy a Tak ?? If so maybe i need to go to japan and get one tak and do a review. hahaha
Picked mine up for Starizona about a week ago and absolutely love it. It's my first astrophotography lens and ASI533 dedicated setup.
Awesome!! Congratulations!
I'm so happy as an SQA55 owner....I did my own research before buying as was thinking about the cats, but after comparing went with the Askar...now all the reviews are coming in confirming I made the correct choice! I have not had a chance to use it under the stars because of lousy weather, but I can't wait to get it out - thanks Cuiv I learn a lot from watching your reviews, which has helped me make a good choice here.
next up: SQA106 vs FSQ106. WE NEED THIS!!!!
I bought it, I tested it in depth and I like it very much. Perfect image quality, even ar full frame... !
So happy to see your video on this mate :-D it's amazing how similar our thoughts are on it!! Excellent review of a truly excellent scope!! ❤️
Right?! It's such an amazing little thing!
Oh no Cuiv, I just got a SQA85 and now you are putting me down the SQA55 rabbit hole. Good thing my house is paid off!
Well, first congrats on having your house paid off ;) I hope this SQA85 is working great for you!
@@CuivTheLazyGeek I hope someone makes a video about a "clash" between a Tak FSQ85 and the Askar SQ85
@@sjpp71 I hope @darkskygeek can do that, he has the BabyQ!
This may be the most time-effective review I have ever seen on RUclips since the first 10 seconds say it all 😁 Great review, as always! Thanks for putting the time to do the research and produce this video. I am trying to get my hands on the SQA85 to compare it with the Takahashi FSQ85. Let’s see… Askar does make very compelling products (I am very happy with my 151PHQ!) またね
Hahaha fancy seeing you here! I really hope you can get the SQA85 and compare it to your BabyQ!!
It’s really nice to see that anyone can take a nice scope out of the box and get such great results. The hobby is hard enough and taking the optics out of the equation makes for a pleasant experience.
Askar thought this one out. I bought it about 8 weeks ago, but not just for Astro when camping. The fact that it can be used for terrestrial photography is a bonus. I do like that Askar threaded the front for camera filters which means I do not have to get a second Bahtinov Mask.
Yeah it's really a solid, well thought out offering
Great review. Think I'll pick one of these up. Moving to wide field from an SCT 8.
I am using the Askar 180 Pro, which has similar features and quality. It’s the perfect travel AP scope. The people at Askar really know what they’re doing.
Yep, they seem to have cracked the code to manufacturing and assembly tolerances too!
Can't wait to get mine...nice review, thanks for sharing, CS!
If it's as good as my sample you're going to love it!!
It’s on my list as the top choice for my first wide field “telescope” as a first step for moving up from my mirrorless setup
Thanks for the review! Very helpful
If every sample is as good as this one (and reports from the wild are positive) it will be a beast!
Great review. I was so impressed with this little refractor that I ordered one (got to see your review early with my patreon contribution :) ). It arrived two days ago as well as the complementary clouds that come with all new scopes. Really am excited about the nice flat fields and I am a huge fan of Petzval design scopes.
I hope they sent you SQA 106 as well. It looks to have better stars at the edge of the Medium Format camera, than most scopes have in the middle, which is kinda nuts.
Oh, and great review Cuiv, thanks for the amazing work!
While you are at it, we would also like a review of the SQA 85. Not much on RUclips so far but everyone has them in stock. I'm guessing Askar has not sent them to the usual reviewers and it makes me wonder why they haven't especially when the price is taken into account.
SQA106 isn't quite ready yet! But SQA85.... I might be getting one soon :D
@@CuivTheLazyGeek Oh nice!
Great review so yeah, I bought it with EAF attachment (off your affiliate link, of course). I've been shooting at 360 mm but I needed something in this focal range and as a Petzval with marked camera rotator it is perfect! TY!
I ended up getting purchasing the EAF attachment, it's also very well designed!
4 weeks later, I still haven't had a chance to test it. Weather is a disaster this winter!
Thanks Cuiv, this is great! I now have a solid recommendation for when anyone asks for a good widefield scope. I'm also considering it as a nice travel scope!
It's awesome to see such good widefield alternatives!
Great review as always. Looks like we have here an amazing refractor. Thanks Civ.
Yep, looks like they've cracked the code!
As always, excellent review Cuiv! Thanks!
Thanks as always Dave!
Hi Cuiv
Great video mate Askar has done it again
Looks like it!
Excellent and informative review!
Thanks! I'm glad you found it helpful!
If you put a bright star in the corner, using an APS-c sensor, the image shows some aberration (faint cut-outs in the star shape, caused by aperture vignetting).
For Astro work, it’s best to tape up the aperture ring, since it can be inadvertently moved (been there, done that, got the (unwanted) starburst effect)
The fine focus ring has 1/10 the sensitivity of the coarse focus ring.
Overall results are very good. Use 2x drizzle with BlurXterminator and the results are outstanding, revealing excellent detail across the whole field.
Awesome to hear - and good idea on the aperture ring!
Already bought the SV555 from your last review for 550 EUR, I think it's still worth it. No second one!
Same here! 💪🏼
Yep, the SV555 is also insane value for its price, and more that enough for most!
I was shocked about the price. It's perfect. Literal perfection.
Yep!
I'm not trying to be a argumentative jerk here, just sharing what I have learned from evaluating optics for 50 years, i.e. my thoughts, for what they're worth....for your interest, especially if you are relatively new to astronomy....
No, it isn't perfect. For starters, as is the case with all Askar optics, there is noticeable chromatic aberration, even in the APC sensor. This indicates either a very poor design, or more likely given Askar never reveals the glass they use, they use cheaper quality glass than most manufacturers. FYI, not only does that mean that the colour correction is not optimal, but it makes me wonder if the homogeneity of the glass is sub-standard (which will affect things like opacity of the glass), if the coatings are on all surfaces, and if the coatings suppress reflections over the entire spectrum that CMOS sensors can detect. (..in fact, it is possible that some of what looks like chromatic aberration is actually internal reflections in the deep red/near IR and/or violet/near UV ends of the spectrum..)
Also, as Cuiv pointed out, his test with the full-frame camera was not very discerning, because the pixels are 6um wide, versus 3.76um in the APC camera he used,. I seriously suspect that testing with an ASI6200MM Pro or other camera with 3.76um pixels would reveal even more issues near the sizes & corners of the frame.
Having said that....while any aberrations, poor colour correction, lower than optimal opacity, and internal reflections do reduce contrast & increase the true f-ratio...it is pretty clear that the lens does produce very good results that are more than sufficient for the vast majority of imagers, especially if they factor in the enticing price.
Cheers,
Derek
I had to choose between the Sharpstar 61edph iii and the Askar FRA300. I went for the faster optics of the 61edph iii, but something like the SQA55 seems like a great upgrade in the future. I really can't do the belt EAF system as I pack my gear in a backpack, but hopefully we see something similar with a different focuser in the future. It's also great that Askar/Sharpstar is really dropping the price point for great optics. I haven't seen price adjustments yet from other manufacturers, but if they want to stay competitive they're really going to need to make some changes. Although the optical quality isn't on the level of the SQA series, I still can't believe you can get a solid 140mm triplet from Sharpstar for the same price as a 120mm ED doublet from Skywatcher. It's a great time to be in the hobby.
I am delighted the cat it out of the bag with the new Askar 😅
Ha! Indeed!
Bought it just when it came out, it’s phenomenal!
Awesome! Glad to see more data points!
I really like Askar optics, my first real scope was the FRA300 and I don't think it's as good, but still excellent, it just works. As far as this lens goes, awesome, but I'll stick with my Roki 135 for now. :) Thanks for the review.
I heard lots of good things about the FRA300!
I got this scope the minute it came out and it's been amazing. While I'm planning to add the EAF kit, I was surprised to see it held focus over multiple nights. So I agree, the only annoying thing is the case. For asiair users, I screw the air under the front part of the dovetail.
Glad to see the copies "in the wild" are also performing great!"
Great review. I just purchased the Askar SQA55 using the Agena affiliate link. I’ve been using Canon 300mm f/4 L for wide field, which has worked out very well, even with the 2X teleconverter, but using a proper telescope will be more convenient. I plan to get a EAF to use with it.
Awesome, thank you for your support! Hope it works great for you!
I'll definitely have to put this one on the list to look into in the future when I want another scope (I already feel the bug getting me with that).
and don't worry Cuiv, totally didn't notice the back piece of the scope fall off at 6:56, nope... totally haven't done that exact same thing with the FMA 180 PRO a dozen times already lol..
Shhhhh you didn't see anything! lol
Great review. Getting more pro (at content creation) with every video. More b-roll please.
I'll try, I'm still very allergic to b-roll!
Excellent tool, I can't wait for the weather to run my baby SharpStar 50 EDPH under the sky. Today I received a normal reducer from the company instead of a defective one. Of course, I don't expect the same impressive result in the frame field, but at least I hope for a better result than the previous one.
I just got one this week.Tiny cute small telescope. No first light yet. Would you care telling what was wrong with your flattener?
@@sjpp71 The locking ring that holds the entire lens assembly in place was not tightened in the reducer at the factory, ))) And the front lens of the reducer fell inside the telescope tube, it’s good that I was holding the telescope horizontally at that moment.
Fingers crossed it works great with the new reducer!
@@JVRost Ugh, sorry you went through that, probably not common but definitely not a good look for their quality control... I was getting ridiculous coma at the corners but then realised the backfocus is 55mm from the base of the M48 thread, I was counting from the surface of the FF!
@@sjpp71 Yes, their instructions say that 55 mm should be counted from the base of the thread M 48
I have yet to see Godzilla walk across the background. Thx Cuiv !
I'll do my best to have Godzilla walking across the background next time!
I am absolutely blown away by mine! It's def taken my astrophotography to the next level with pinpoint stars. I am bit bummed I cannot find an additional quick release handle for my asiair using a guide scope😔 No crazy gripes tho
Good point! Just sent them a message to tell them to please sell such a handle separately!
Thats my negative......mounting additional equipment ie: Pegasus, asiair, etc........where to mount everything else?!?!?!
@astro_shooter76 I found a solution. Did some sleuthing after watching lukomatico's review on it and his mounting solutions. He Placed two Altair keystone riser blocks between two additional Askar LDP 300 universal dovetails. It allows you to place all asiair etc under the scope while using a guide scope. A lot more money, but a solution nontheless.
@@astro_shooter76 If you see tons of comments, please ignore. My response keeps disappearing on my end. 2 askar LSP300 dovetails sandwiched between 2 Altair keystone riser blocks works. Look at lukomatico's review. Allows you to place everything inside the makeshift "cage" below the scope.
@@astro_shooter76 I found a solution using two askaar ldp300 dovetails sandwiched between two ataiir keystone riser blocks. Watch LucoMatico review to get a visual
Ended up ordering the SV555 as my first telescope based on your last review. This one looks great also but it's almost double the price.
Exactly, the SV555 is insane bang for the buck!
Yes I ordered a SV555 as well, the price is unbeatable and even got a guide scope and dew heater as the same price as the scope alone, couldn't say no. Will be an awesome portable setup.
SQA85 next? Excellent review!
I hope so!
Wow.. I'm already looking at the askar 103APO which seems like an awesome scope. Now I'm thinking this one will also find a home on my mount. Lol
I'm honestly so much looking forward to the SQA106!!
@CuivTheLazyGeek that looks like an excellent bit of kit for sure!
Wow these reviews of the askar lens are coming fast and furious. They have changed my mind and i will not choose the recat 51 as my entry lens into the hoby. Thanks for the content!!
You should also consider Sharpstar EDPHiii with 1.0x flattener. I got it for just over 4000CNY and the stars and star shapes are amazing. Friend has Takahashi of the same focal length and mine beats his fair and square, it leaves it miles behind. I have 8HD and I wanted something wider and this small scope brought me back into the hobby when I was losing motivation. There is no wonder why Trevor has chosen it as a base for his signature scope and put his name on it.
It's honestly, really an impressive scope. I'm wondering if they've finally figured out how to lower manufacturing and assembly tolerances
@@CuivTheLazyGeek Especially because now it has two ED elements
Well after space koala's review and this one from you, Cuiv, I really want one. The only problem is that I have too many other combinations to get the same field of view with a Canon rp and other astro cameras with different lens and telescope combinations... 😢 Might need to sell some stuff if these sqa55's continue to get good reviews. 👍👍
Keep looking for data points, will be good to see more in the wild as well!
When you demonstrated the real world results, and you were praising the circular stars in each side of the frame, why does the empty regions of space look green and red instead of black? Is that normal? I understand that the center star is glowing and lighting up the surrounding space. Is there a name for this green and red appearance? And would it look the same with the naked eye? Very interesting. A cool review video.
Excellent review as well Cuiv. Looking forward to playing with this scope, I ordered it before I even got to the end of Luke's video :)
Thanks Pete!!
If this was out when I was considering a redcat years ago, this would be the clear winner. And now I'm just trying not to spend all my money :)
Great review!
Keep doing those good mosaic stacking videos ;)
@@CuivTheLazyGeek Thanks, Cuiv :)
Hi Cuiv, thank you for another awesome video!
In Australia, ASKAR SQA55 is $1300, the SVBONY SV555 is $800. Is Askar worth extra $500?
I was thinking of getting Askar but $500 extra is kinda a lot.
Cheers mate
I think the SV555 would be enough for 80% of people!
@CuivTheLazyGeek thanks mate
I recently watched some videos that tested camera lenses for astrophotography, and wow, I had no idea how bad the images were even on lenses that cost many times what this lens does. $1800 lenses with coma, astigmatism, chromatic abberation, and field curvature - unbelievable.
Yeah camera lenses can be anything. It's crazy. It almost feels like a scam.
Worst of it all is that they can do an excellent job, if they want to. I own an Canon 32mm f1.4 for the discontinued ef-m mount which is awesome. Sharp and clean, even wide open. It is even better than much more expensive lenses
I think there's far more lottery with camera lenses - most people will never know they got a lemon...
Maybe by un-clipping the handle, the scope can fit it in the case with an auto-focuser attached? Perhaps some new foam insert required?
Hello Cuiv, great review. Seeing so many viable options pop up regularly in the market is nice. Going back to your video where a small Newtonian is compared to a small refractor, I have a question: how do you believe this SQA55 would compare to, let's say, an Apertura Carbonstar 150, which falls in the same price bracket? Thanks
That's an excellent question - I think I would need to compare the SQA85 though to have at least a semblance of competition in terms of focal length!
Nice review Quiv, Askar had been sending them to a lot of youtubers
For me this type of focusser (helical) is a bit of negative point
Agree - although now that I have an EAF fitted to it... no longer an issue!
16:02 noticed same immediately. Sv555 was spiked on brighter stars.
Hi Cuiv, another great review. Looks to be a great piece of kit but I wont be buying one. I don't doubt its performance but I think the small refractor end of the market is pretty saturated at the moment. At the end of the day this is still more or less an f5 scope. On the few nights a month that I can image from where I live, it is rare that the sky is clear enough to image for more than about three hours a night, with an f5 scope it can take up to to two months to capture enough data to produce a reasonably noise free image, so in my case my next scope will have to be something a lot faster, I'm beginning to think that something like a C8 with a hyperstar might actually be a better fit for my own circumstances, I just wish there was more competition at this end of the market.
Check Lukomatico's recent Hyperstar video! Or just go for a Newt - Newts are love, Newts are life ;)
@@CuivTheLazyGeek Thanks Cuiv, It was actually Luke's video that gave me the idea for the Hyperstar. I will revisit some of your Newtonian videos though. Clear skies.
Anyone wanna buy my redcat 51? I think I'm sold on this for my portable setup! Hopefully the SQA106 performs as well, or better, than this little gem! Thanks Cuiv, again, for another fantastic review.
Hahaha your RC51 is still a very good scope :D
I own one and they are fantastic. I REALLY wish they offered an additional guide scope mount which could be used to mount a mini PC. Unfortunately, they don't
I've asked them to sell them separately, I hope they go for it!
@@CuivTheLazyGeek Thank You!! I did the same a while back, I'm hoping others have asked as well. It truly is an awesome scope !
I designed and printed a few parts for it. A front support mount to stop the flexing, and a small adapter to allow mounting a mini guide scope dovetail on one of the side mounts. If anyone is in need search Thingiverse for Askar SQA55 and you should find the 3 items I created.
What do you think about the Askar FMA180 (not pro)? It is a tiny (40 mm aperture) triplet apo and comes with a full-frame flattener/reducer. Without that, the telescope can be used with a star diagonal and eyepiece, or a 45-degrees Amici prism and eyepiece, or a Herschel wedge and eyepiece (or camera). It seems to be very versatile.
Thanks for another great review. It looks like the vignetting on the full frame is very different from left corners to right corners. Is that something to worry about?
True - I don't think it's something to worry about, I see that to some extent in pretty much every scope I use
Great review !! So if you have to decide between the SV555 and the SQA55, with one will you chose ? wich one have more value for money ? Thank you so much !
Bang for the buck, SV555 - but the SQA55 is worth the upgrade. Difficult choice ;)
Very convincing...good work. But a noob question: I have a 300mm Nikon f4 lens (prime) that I use with Z6 (full frame). Why do i need this instead? I mean what benefit do i get (practical)? I am just starting out in Astro-Photo, just got my GTi mount. Just waiting for full moon to go away to try out.
If you get good enough stars with your Nikon F4 lens, no need to changed! Typically F4 primes will need to be closed to around F5.6 to have acceptable star shapes (and thus sharpness) across the field, but there is lens lottery!
@@CuivTheLazyGeek Thank you. My thought is why spend so much to get similar focal length. Will save up for at least 400-500mm telescope.
Hi Cuiv. Awesome as always. So one weird question. Sorry if this is a dumb question. I understand the Askar SQA55 Quintuplet does not require a field flattener. However, could it still be used with a reducer? If so, do you know of any reducers that might work with it?
No, I don't think it can be used with a reducer - I think F4.8 is pretty good already, if you want F4.5 you'll need to look at the SVBony SV555!
Thanks as always Cuiv! Different scopes, obviously, but how much better (or worse) does it perform against the Askar V with the 60mm reducer, giving about the same focal length?
The Askar V with the 60mm + reducer is no slouch... but the SQA55 is better...
great reveiw
It’s OK to pixel peep if you’re analyzing the optics. of course, do it all the time it might possibly drive one mad. 🤪
Unless you're drunk when pixel peeping, as per your user name ;)
@ Indeed…
i'm looking forward to SQA106 , this is the FSQ106 that takahashi do not produce anymore and for one third cheaper .
Yesss! I hope to get my hands on it when it becomes available!
Excellent test, thank you! I have an SQA55 as well but I’m not seeing anywhere near the level of vignetting you are showing. I see just a minor level of vignetting more in keeping with Askar’s promised specs on field illumination, which claims only a 10% falloff at the corners of a full-frame sensor. You are showing much worse vignetting even on a cropped frame camera, and uneven with the right side much darker than the left. As it is, your results are contrary to Askar’s promised performance, and any difference between promised and actual performance is just what a review should point out. So what might be the explanation of the vignetting you show? It can’t be just sky gradients from your urban site? It would be “enlightening” to find out! Thanks! I enjoy your reviews as they are always thorough and cover products we often don’t hear about in North America.
Remember that I'm using auto stretch! Different levels of auto stretch will show different levels of vignetting, and exaggerate differences, it's a map transfer function (so you can't say anything conclusive from this video - tbh I never consider vignetting to be much of an issue for me)
The proper way of measuring would be to use flat frames and look at the pixel values - I'll do that for my next scope review!
It seems to outperform the Redcat 51 which is already an exceptional little scope. Now, here is a difficult question: Would you sell a Redcat 51 to get yourself the SQA55?
That's what I've just done. Bought the SQA, sold the red cat
Cuiv, Don’t know if you watch comments on older videos, but I received the Askar SQA55 purchased from your link, and it’s defective. I can’t say I’ve received much defective product from Agena, but it is disappointing nonetheless. The SQA55 shoe that the dovetail bracket goes into is loose with no apparent way to tighten it. It must be from the inside. And best I can tell, there is no easy way to open this telescope. There are 4 of these attachment points on the lens and 2 of them are loose, one very loose which is used for the mount dovetail. Hard to see how this escaped QA. I’ve contacted Agena for an RMA and they want to contact ASKAR. So it’s all turning into a long protracted mess. It’s what I get for being an early adopter. Oh well not your fault, but sometimes Females get this kind of treatment from astronomy and photography vendors (many times 2nd hand returns are pawned off on us, and then the doubt when an issue is reported and then the long run-around to resolve things).
Hi Cuiv, Did the guiding sensor on the ZWO2600Air work well with the M48 connector? That is, you did not need an M54 connector for the guiding sensor to get enough light? Thanks for the review!
No issues whatsoever, but I haven't tried with a narrowband filter yet
@@CuivTheLazyGeek Thanks! I just bought one of these scopes to replace my redcat 51 (first generation). Keep the good work!
No smiling cat? Dealbreaker! 🙂
Definitely lol
Let us take a moment and honor the pixel peepers among us. I credit this often maligned group of people with encouraging telescope makers to address poor corner stars.. which have plagued us for years.
The competition is heating up. I don't think telling folks to rely on software to fix corner stars is going to cut it :)
True! Thank you to all the pixel peepers out there!
Any suggestion for a similar quality OTA in the 400-500mm range? I have seen Askar has a 85 version but we also approach the 3000 $ range 😢
The proof of the pudding with all Askar gear will be how well it holds up in the Astrophotography quality lottery.
Once burned twice shy.
Yes indeed! Fortunately reports I'm getting from the wild are very encouraging for now!
Thanks for the comprehensive review, can these side adapter plates of the SQA55 bei used for the connection of guidescopes or the asiair?
No it seems they would need to sell additional arms, good point!
Hi Cuiv, As Always very grateful for your videos. Quick Question: It's older brother the ACL200 has an odd quirk in that the entire front of the telescope (lens) moves when you (coarse) focus. (I did not realize till I made a triple scope setup and made a bracket to hold the front of the scopes together. My painful lesson ;) )
Is it the same with the SQA55 (it's hard to notice if you're not looking for it)
Thx!
The front of the SQA55 does move, so it's not fully itnernal
Might want to use higher f ratio for planetary just guessing
Obviously ! Look at the specs !!! And results !!!!!
I was wondering if you think that the case could conceivably be modified if one was to install an EAF?
I understand that with the standard foam and OTA orientation there isn’t physical room for the EAF.
Is the interior foam removable from the outer case?
If the OTA turned on its side and the foam was fully replaced, would everything fit in your opinion?
Just curious.
BTW - love your channel!
mmmmmmmmh maybe? But I think the fit is too tight
At this point, with what we have, I don't think it's economically efficient to buy a doublet or even a triplet in this size (50-60mm). Just get this, or someone on a budget, get the Svbony SV555. Don't bother with doublets and triplets and mess around with backfocus issues, and still dealing with F5.9 (at best), while these scopes are a full F stop faster! Not to mention the hidden cost of the flattener. Now I feel like, getting a full frame camera starts to make sense😊 , it's just my bank acct. that went on strike. 🙄
Absolutely. This and the SV555 are a quiet revolution imo.
What do you need to mount an ASIAIR to this scope?
Hi Cuiv, another great review and based on what you said previously, I'm going to do something I don't usually do and that's buy a telescope based on a youtube review. I usually take a while and multiple data sources to make decisions as it's still in my DNA being a retired engineer. But based on the fact that dingdong running the country next year is at least threatening tariffs, which means price increases, and I've needed a wide field imaging scope for some time, I ordered one through your channel. If it doesn't work out you'll be the first to know :)
Oh wow! I really hope it works out! For now, it does look like reports from the wild are very positive - and you're right, with looming tariffs, the time to stock up is now...
My data sources indicate the economy will be much better, which means I'll have more $$ to spend on AP 😂
Thanks for the review. Theoretically, if the SQA106 would be the same, would it be better or worse than an FSQ106EDX4? Or is the FSQ still in it's own class?
On paper it's better than Tak. However no reducer for the Askar is out, at least yet, for those crazy F3 speed.
@@blufferblue1599 that is exactly what I thought. The thing is, I do not see any of these chromatic abberations on any of my Tak pictures. Hence my question. Always on the hunt if something better is out there. But in this case I fail to properly understand it yet.
I wish I could get my hands on a Tak like that :)
OMG I am going to have to reprocess ALL of my photos from the last couple years.
I was watching you check the edges of the image for star shapes and you kept saying (almost disappointedly) saying "perfectly round"
And I'm thinking to myself, aren't they a little oblong?
THEN I PUT MY GLASSES ON. Sheesh... I've been throwing out perfectly good frames
(I'm new to glasses BTW, but I've needed them for a couple years at least)
Great review. I already have the RedCat so.... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Oh man that's something I would never have thought about! Well have fun reprocessing ;)
@ on the plus side I might get an all new set of pics from this realization!
Hahaha thank you for that!
Oh, good, a telescope that’s sealed tighter than my weekend plans. Because the real enemy of astronomy is air? LOL
Being a newbie how does this compare to the 71f?
are there refractor scope that have a faster aperture? my sony 70-200 and 300mm lens are F2.8. and my 600mm is F4
How does it compare to SharpstarEDPHIII? I am constantly amazed by its quality. Have you still got it?
Recommend with 1.0 flattener
I had the EDPH II (the one Trevor's scope was based on) which is completely different from the EDPH III! I've actually never tested the III, so I can't say much about it.
The II obviously had the horrendous CA issue I had found, but that was fixed by a free objective lens exchange program, but otherwise was a good little scope!
@@CuivTheLazyGeek I really recommend the iii version with 1.0 flattener . It really is amazing. Something to compare and review.
I really don't understand this "trend" of making dual telescope/camera lens things. You can get much better telephoto lenses for you DLSR with all the other features of a good DSLR matched lens. So, why overcomplicate a telescope with adjustable aperture?
I can get really sharp stars in the corner of my Nikon Z 70-200 but I can't mate it with a ZWO camera due to backfocus being too close.
Honestly not sure, but it doesn't really bother me - the EAF attachment I purchased is excellent too - still used as a lens I think it would be superior to telephoto lenses (even prime ones) in terms of pure image sharpness. Would be interesting to get "real" photographer opinions after using it
Still see CA but better than the SV555. The astrobin samples look good too.
Yeah this one is really a keeper
how does it compare with Celestron Nexstar 8HD?
Mmm but my camera is female 42mm thread, does it come with a converter ?
Oh I thought you said that was the sv555
Sweet
What would you recommend for wide field but for smaller sensor size - I don't need APS-C - just basic sensor and fast scope? I've read about EvoGuide 50 + flatner but it seems to have problematic focuser with huge backlash.
Would work great with a 294 of 533, still gives you so good FOV!
@@CuivTheLazyGeek are you talking on this scope? Obviously it would work with smaller sensor. But it comes on premium.
Focuser could be more EAF friendly.
It's just only a tiny 55mm scope. These small lenses are much easier to correct to a higher standard.
6:54 ... oops.. 🤭
Whoopsie! 😂
I think I'll start saving my pennies 😉
Good idea :)
Disgusting! ❤ Great review, love your work on this channel Cuiv, thank you!!
Thank you so much!
Very nice scope. But, the choice of a helical focuser is kind of unfortunate (as well as the aperture adjustment ring; although you can just leave that open). I understand they were going for a telescope/camera lens combo, but I have a hard time seeing its usefulness. Even William Optics moved away from this concept. Otherwise, it is an excellent telescope.
Since filming the video, I negotiated to buy my sample, and also bought the EAF kit - it works beautifully and the belt tensioner is excellent, so while I agree that I prefer R&P type focusers, this helical focuser doesn't bother me at all in the end!
@@CuivTheLazyGeek you're completely right. It is not a deal killer by any means, more like a minor hindrance. :)
But, say what you will about WO (I am not a huge fan myself), their internal focuser is quite nice. I would be all over an SQA55-II with a similar internal focuser, no aperture adjustment, and perhaps a little bigger image circle to cut down on that pesky vignetting (even though it is easily correctable).
I choose to purchase this scope over the new redcat 51 gen 3 do to the flat field and sharp stars seen on the edges especially in this price range. Some of the images on astrobin with no post processing are very impressive. My askar sqa55 is on its way. I do have a question though. Did you find any walking noise/raining noise in your tests or did you dither enough to not have an issues. Thanks again for all the great content!
@@CuivTheLazyGeekNice that you could buy your sample avoiding the lottery! Well played sir.
@randymo8709 Ha! True! Although I have heard of other good samples in the wild (phew)
sounds cool, but isnt a sub 1000 € lens kind of "underpowered", considering the rest of your gear (camera and mount) cost like 5 times as much?
It's a great widefield lens/scope, would pair great with an AM3 + 2600MC Air for instance! Now I'm curious about the SQA85 and SQA106!
What happened to the sv555? 😬
As I mentioned in the review video, it was on loan for review and so I gave it back. I kinda sorta purchased the SQA55 though :p
Yes but a direct comparison with the little svbony would have been nicer ...the redcat was a lost battle already..btw since you are there a visit to starbase would be ideal with the direct prices they have there 😬
I have an opportunity of an oldy sharpstar 65q ed at 300usd used what do you think?
When I first saw the thumbnail of the vid, I thought A55 was a 3 letter word.
Ha! :D