@janecutts7921 Not really it requires MPs to lift their heads out of the trough to educate themselves, the majority of the uniparty blob are still pro net zero lunacy. Once the climate cult convinced people that the gas of life carbon dioxide was a pollutant anything is possible. Not wishing ill on anyone but Guido Fawkes’ planned action in the bowels of WEFminister is more understandable as time passes😩
WE NEED TO GET RID OF THE WEF WHO UN AND MAKE SURE THE EU IS NOT BACK IN TROUBLE IS I FEEL THE UK IS FINISHED I AM FREEZING IN MY HOME BUT I WILL START TO EAT LESS AND PAY MORE FOR MY HEATING ITS 640F TONIGHT BRRRRR
Thank you David. You take more time in assessment than most MPs. Drax. Chopping down actual trees, 'pelletising'(an energy consuming manufacturing process )those trees, freighting them across America, then shipping them across the Atlantic, then freighting them across the UK to burn...is more environmentally sound than the UK using Gas???? Make it make sense.
It is explained by Dr. Albert Ellis's "irrational belief", an identifiable mental illness and defined in the USA's Psychological Dictionary as: - "irrational belief or cognitive dissonance is an illogical, erroneous or distorted idea, firmly held despite objective contradictory evidence" There are tens of thousands of independent, well qualified Physicists, Geologists, Engineers and Others who have PROVED with FACT based research that there is no such thing as "human caused global warming/climate change"
@@scaryfakevirus he’s better than anything we have available, I’ll trust him until ‘proven’ that I shouldn’t. At the very least I need to be able to ‘hope’, the alternative is too depressing.
this climate stuff should be put to the public vote.they will never ask the public because they learned the public was not on board with wrecking the nation from the brexit vote.they wont make that mistake again imo.
CO2 is currently around 420 parts per million, increased, they tell us, from 280 ppm in 1850 (estimated). That's a difference of 140 ppm, or in terms more readily understood by the layman, the composition of the atmosphere has changed by 0.014% (14 thousandths of 1%) in the last 175 years. LESS THAN 1 THOUSANDTH OF 1% PER DECADE! That's it. That's the TOTAL 'carbon footprint' for the entire planet, and human activity is only responsible for a small part of that increase. This measurement is averaged annually from much higher and lower daily figures. All the development that has occurred in this timeframe, everything we have built, all industry and every drop of fuel burned is included in that calculation. Furthermore, every life form on this planet; on the land, in the sea and in the air is composed of carbon compounds that were once in the air as CO2, and every living thing that has come and gone in those 175 years is incorporated in a figure that doesn't fall outside of a reasonable margin of error. Our annual emissions equate to no more than a couple of extra CO2 molecules per tree leaf on the planet. The claim that it is only our "emissions" that remain in the air and accumulate year on year, nature cannot cope with our contribution or that the carbon cycle was somehow magically in perfect equilibrium before we started to burn coal and oil is a complete fairy tale designed to fool the gullible. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have declared that methane is 86 times more effective as a greenhouse gas than CO2, therefore we have to stop farming cattle, give up meat and dairy products, plus adopt a vegan diet or eat insects. This claim deserves a little scrutiny. Firstly, every cell of every living thing on the planet, animal or vegetable, is composed of carbon compounds that were once in the air as CO2. Plants absorb it from the air, animals eat the plants, those are eaten by larger animals, and so on up the food chain. Eventually everything dies and decomposes back to it's component parts, the carbon returns to CO2 and methane. Pound for pound, ALL life forms contain about the same amount of carbon, so it makes no difference whether it decomposes in your stomach or in open air, anything you eat will decompose and the cycle starts again. No animal can make it's food into more carbon than the food absorbed from the air. Secondly, the infra red response of methane is entirely covered by that of water vapour, which is variable, but usually in the range of 2-4% of the air (Or 20,000-40,000 parts per million, to put it in "climate" speak). Methane is just 1.9 ppm (0.000019%), and hardly increasing. Methane oxidises into CO2 and wv relatively quickly. In other words, methane cannot absorb any IR energy that wv hasn't already absorbed, so has NO EFFECT on temperatures. Incidentally, wv is over 200 times as effective as CO2 (420 ppm) as a "greenhouse gas". In short, the IPCC's claim is a provable lie. Why would you trust anything they say?
Jerry the initial effect on CO2was in the first 20ppm decline thereafter on a log base it was written up after experimental data that above 340ppm no measurable heat was detected. That destroyed the net zero extremist camp. Philip G. Sieg, William Berner, Peter K. Harnish, and Philip C. Nelson, Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA 19104 September 2, 2018
Please can we just get a couple of points straight here, yes China are building new coal fired power stations but these are all clean burn technology that we spent millions on and then scrapped, at the same time they are decommissioning their old dirtier power plants so they are not going to have that many more than already exist. The reason they need all this extra energy is somewhat because we have transported all our manufacturing over there, so their emissions are actually our emissions in a different country to make us look so nice and clean, also they are heavily reliant on imported oil which western nations lead by the US are trying to reduce so there is a big issue around their energy security, as there is here but our idiot politicians think this can be overcome by building more and more, increasingly expensive to the bill payers, renewables. China is just looking out for their own people, something western nations have not done for donkeys years.
Trump, drill baby drill, has everything to do with Kier Stammer decision to postpone this ridiculous bill. He is trying to improve his image with Trump.
David, good evening sir do you have party presence in north Wales. keep up the good fight sir, we need other parties other than the trash and bile we have in westminster.👌👌
Labour voted against knowing that in July the Tories, Reform, and green lot will pass this CAN thing with all the flying colours there are. God help us all' Were going to need him.
Isn't there a sting in the tail of the cancellation of this bill? I believe Labour have promised disappointed labour supporters of the bill that they will have a say in any up coming environmental legislation.
200 yrs, what absolute rubbish coal and wood are carbon, they've been used for thousands of years, but I get it. Tar is a carbon-based product that has been used in torches and weaponry
@caroleanneruncorn4794 that has got to be the most astonishing comment ever. Have you any idea what the agenda is? You probably think them barriers in Tesco are to prevent shoplifting and a digital ID is to help you because it is convenient. It's all interlinked. All connected. To a single agenda. The climate bill topic is highly important because it cannot be passed into law at all costs. Here's a hint (it already HAS BEEN). this is why I suggest something is going on behind the scenes.
Learn how to take your sovereignty back people, learn about trust’s. No one can touch your property if placed within a trust that is set up properly, not government not hmrc not even the king can touch it. Peter wilson of Return to true democracy have great knowledge of this, do your research people sovereign project is worth a look too
They know they've been rumbled. They'll wait till we forget, repackage it, and do it all again.
Yes they will try again
@@weefatshug101 yes it will go on and on until they get their own way
Starmer could be gone by July, following the local elections. In fact it is quite likely.
That's if anyone will be there...we must keep challenging them and their lies
@@DavidMartin-ym2teplease let it be so!!
I am still worried, it is merely posponed
Postponed until they rearrange the deck chairs on this Titanic.
No climate crisis.
Lunatic crisis
Massive hoax!
@@PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPI bloody right there and that applies too the members of the public who believe in this crap
Never has been a climate crisis
@@thesheepman220 There were several other 'crisis' that never were too!! But they still have more in the pipeline.
I emailed my MP requesting they vote against it.
But they didn't vote it was suspended
@@janetcutts7921 Well I will write again if the time comes. What I mean is: write to your MP and say noooooo!
@@janetcutts7921
Well ... he wrote with good intentions in anycase
@@lynnepostings At least he did something!
@@scaryfakevirus
Exactly ! 😊👍
Scary that 7 voted for it.
This would be catastrophic if this was made to happen
A battle won but the war goes on.
It beggars belief that some MP's knew nothing about this you have to ask why !
@janecutts7921 Not really it requires MPs to lift their heads out of the trough to educate themselves, the majority of the uniparty blob are still pro net zero lunacy. Once the climate cult convinced people that the gas of life carbon dioxide was a pollutant anything is possible. Not wishing ill on anyone but Guido Fawkes’ planned action in the bowels of WEFminister is more understandable as time passes😩
many MPs don't know anything about anything except how much is in their next month's salary.
The C&N Bill would be an "end of life" note for the UK.
PURE MARXISM !
Fantastic news!
One can only hope that our mps may finally be starting to wake up.
No, it just means they know they are under the spotlight, they will try again when they think we are suitably distracted...
We should leave the Paris agreement, like the USA.
This is the only UK politician who talks sense.
All these creatures have reached the end of the line! They are totally finished.
Yep , look up scorched Earth policy and then you see as you said finished and this is what they doing on their way out
Don't bank on it...they'll regroup their ranks
@drd6416 lots of other factors to take into consideration! They can't survive anymore!
WE NEED TO GET RID OF THE WEF WHO UN AND MAKE SURE THE EU IS NOT BACK IN TROUBLE IS I FEEL THE UK IS FINISHED I AM FREEZING IN MY HOME BUT I WILL START TO EAT LESS AND PAY MORE FOR MY HEATING ITS 640F TONIGHT BRRRRR
This is still very scary
This is a Trump ripple! Politicians suddenly realising they're on the wrong side.
Thank you David
It's brilliant news
God is working in mysterious ways for us
It isn't finished yet mate.
Thank you David. You take more time in assessment than most MPs.
Drax. Chopping down actual trees, 'pelletising'(an energy consuming manufacturing process )those trees, freighting them across America, then shipping them across the Atlantic, then freighting them across the UK to burn...is more environmentally sound than the UK using Gas????
Make it make sense.
It is explained by Dr. Albert Ellis's "irrational belief", an identifiable mental illness and defined in the USA's Psychological Dictionary as: -
"irrational belief or cognitive dissonance is an illogical, erroneous or distorted idea, firmly held despite objective contradictory evidence"
There are tens of thousands of independent, well qualified Physicists, Geologists, Engineers and Others who have PROVED with FACT based research that there is no such thing as "human caused global warming/climate change"
Thank God there's a stay on this bill. Wrote to my MP using your letter thanks David.
How can we get the letter. I'd love to email my MP in Commy Bristol.
After listening to Trump at the WEF conference I think it will have a profound impact on the decision made by the UK all for the better good
Trump simply allows them to back out of their plans because the masses are revolting hard .......
Trump isn't a good guy or the saviour; meet the new boss, the same as the old boss. He is still answerable to the global elite.
You hope!! He isn't what you think he is I am afraid to say. I really wish I was wrong though.
@@scaryfakevirus he’s better than anything we have available, I’ll trust him until ‘proven’ that I shouldn’t.
At the very least I need to be able to ‘hope’, the alternative is too depressing.
It should be chucked out and never raise its ugly title again, so it’s annoying that they are going to bring it up again.
That makes me even more suspicious of Starmer and his woke cabinet!
Agenda 2030 on steroids.
It’s been voted - no. That should be the end of it.
But it wasn't voted the whips stopped it some MP's knew nothing about this you have to ask 🤦
Excellent news! I never got a reply to my protest email from my Labour MP though I hope she voted for the adjournment.
Thank goodness but they will keep trying thank you for letting us know
End this climate nonsense
Absolutely agree 💯
this climate stuff should be put to the public vote.they will never ask the public because they learned the public was not on board with wrecking the nation from the brexit vote.they wont make that mistake again imo.
Thank god for that!
CO2 is currently around 420 parts per million, increased, they tell us, from 280 ppm in 1850 (estimated). That's a difference of 140 ppm, or in terms more readily understood by the layman, the composition of the atmosphere has changed by 0.014% (14 thousandths of 1%) in the last 175 years. LESS THAN 1 THOUSANDTH OF 1% PER DECADE! That's it. That's the TOTAL 'carbon footprint' for the entire planet, and human activity is only responsible for a small part of that increase. This measurement is averaged annually from much higher and lower daily figures. All the development that has occurred in this timeframe, everything we have built, all industry and every drop of fuel burned is included in that calculation. Furthermore, every life form on this planet; on the land, in the sea and in the air is composed of carbon compounds that were once in the air as CO2, and every living thing that has come and gone in those 175 years is incorporated in a figure that doesn't fall outside of a reasonable margin of error. Our annual emissions equate to no more than a couple of extra CO2 molecules per tree leaf on the planet. The claim that it is only our "emissions" that remain in the air and accumulate year on year, nature cannot cope with our contribution or that the carbon cycle was somehow magically in perfect equilibrium before we started to burn coal and oil is a complete fairy tale designed to fool the gullible.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have declared that methane is 86 times more effective as a greenhouse gas than CO2, therefore we have to stop farming cattle, give up meat and dairy products, plus adopt a vegan diet or eat insects. This claim deserves a little scrutiny.
Firstly, every cell of every living thing on the planet, animal or vegetable, is composed of carbon compounds that were once in the air as CO2. Plants absorb it from the air, animals eat the plants, those are eaten by larger animals, and so on up the food chain. Eventually everything dies and decomposes back to it's component parts, the carbon returns to CO2 and methane. Pound for pound, ALL life forms contain about the same amount of carbon, so it makes no difference whether it decomposes in your stomach or in open air, anything you eat will decompose and the cycle starts again. No animal can make it's food into more carbon than the food absorbed from the air.
Secondly, the infra red response of methane is entirely covered by that of water vapour, which is variable, but usually in the range of 2-4% of the air (Or 20,000-40,000 parts per million, to put it in "climate" speak). Methane is just 1.9 ppm (0.000019%), and hardly increasing. Methane oxidises into CO2 and wv relatively quickly. In other words, methane cannot absorb any IR energy that wv hasn't already absorbed, so has NO EFFECT on temperatures. Incidentally, wv is over 200 times as effective as CO2 (420 ppm) as a "greenhouse gas". In short, the IPCC's claim is a provable lie. Why would you trust anything they say?
Jerry the initial effect on CO2was in the first 20ppm decline thereafter on a log base it was written up after experimental data that above 340ppm no measurable heat was detected. That destroyed the net zero extremist camp. Philip G. Sieg, William Berner, Peter K. Harnish, and Philip C. Nelson,
Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia PA 19104
September 2, 2018
Thank you for that information. Very cogently put!
Thanks for that news David I was wondering how that went...great news 😊
well done David
Good news. Thanks for bringing this to everyone’s attention.
July- When farmers are out in the fields
Praise the Lord Almighty God
Amen
Absolutely I can't say enough
God is working in mysterious ways for us
Please can we just get a couple of points straight here, yes China are building new coal fired power stations but these are all clean burn technology that we spent millions on and then scrapped, at the same time they are decommissioning their old dirtier power plants so they are not going to have that many more than already exist. The reason they need all this extra energy is somewhat because we have transported all our manufacturing over there, so their emissions are actually our emissions in a different country to make us look so nice and clean, also they are heavily reliant on imported oil which western nations lead by the US are trying to reduce so there is a big issue around their energy security, as there is here but our idiot politicians think this can be overcome by building more and more, increasingly expensive to the bill payers, renewables. China is just looking out for their own people, something western nations have not done for donkeys years.
Yes. good news.
The nature bit gets me the corporate banking cabal are doing their best to destroy life on earth.
Damn, I've had beans this morning.
God bless you too David
YES!!!!!!!
Ice cores clearly show co2 rises FOLLOW temperature rises. We need more co2 not less
Lord Jesus please have mercy on your children Amen
This is bonkers. Thanks David for highlighting. How do they expect us to survive?
That's the point, they don't want us to survive.
Haven't you nnticed yet that that is the whole point of all this bonkers legislation? Bonkers but real. They want most people gone.
Thank God for that David
David. I have just asked Dan Wootton to have your Guest Graham Moore ECS President on his show about the criminal justice act of 1988 on Torture. ♥️
A repreive!
So that’s 127 MPs where were the rest of the *****?
Fantastic ! light at the end of the tunnel
Over optimistic
These MPs don’t represent the public they do has they are told by who is running the show.
Shouldn’t be allowed to keep bringing it back once it’s been voted down !!
No only difference is to millibands bank balance
Fabulous news
Great news!
You’ve got it wrong, if it went through today it would’ve failed.
I’d of voted to carry on.
Now they have six months to get the numbers
Great news David
Great news for the time being at least.
We must never give up hope
Get rid of our parliament
This is such good news!!
Sadly it will keep going through until it's passed
nope!
All designed by Meglomaniacs
A lot can happen in 6 months.
They’ll be taxes is for farting next!😅
I’d be bankrupt in a week😂😂😂
Good!
Fantastic….Amazing what crap they Sneakily try and inflict on us…. !!
Something very fishy going on today and how it's being sold by the Guardian
Need to pray more about this!
Thats great news for the moment.
Thanks so much.
Trump, drill baby drill, has everything to do with Kier Stammer decision to postpone this ridiculous bill.
He is trying to improve his image with Trump.
Millyband will still be in his dark safe space throwing a hissy fit !
David, good evening sir do you have party presence in north Wales. keep up the good fight sir, we need other parties other than the trash and bile we have in westminster.👌👌
Two steps forward one step back
Yea!!!
I’d love to know whose running the UK AS Starmer definitely not
Globalist banking and corporate entities, among others, IMO.
The World Economic Forum
bibi-nutty-yoohoo
Drax was a Coal Power Station.......from a local Mine....how sensible was that ......but not anymore its utter madness 😢
Labour voted against knowing that in July the Tories, Reform, and green lot will pass this CAN thing with all the flying colours there are. God help us all' Were going to need him.
Good news for a change...
120 to 7..... There's 650 of them
Good
The first bit of good news on this, need to keep this in mind so they don't try to slip it through when everyone has forgotten about it.
Fantastic news - for now.
At the very least the Bill should be split in half as they are completely different.
Good news... Still dont trust them tho.
Isn't there a sting in the tail of the cancellation of this bill? I believe Labour have promised disappointed labour supporters of the bill that they will have a say in any up coming environmental legislation.
Obviously NONE of their actions if for the good of us or Gods creation.
100MW is enough power to support 400 EVs on charge,
Chope has lost the plot. 😢😢
Might not be a UK Parliament by 7th July.
its not our fualt we are signed up to this agreement
Ah common sense 👍
They can go forth and multiple
200 yrs, what absolute rubbish coal and wood are carbon, they've been used for thousands of years, but I get it. Tar is a carbon-based product that has been used in torches and weaponry
All bollocks... Agree with Trump !
Coal comes from trees.
Prolonging the inevitable, keep drinking the Kool-aid..
Trump
Udder BS
👍
ReformUK will never agree to climate change ,thought i would correct you,💯👍🏴🩵🩵🩵
Why adjourned?? Suspicious
Who cares.
@caroleanneruncorn4794 that has got to be the most astonishing comment ever. Have you any idea what the agenda is? You probably think them barriers in Tesco are to prevent shoplifting and a digital ID is to help you because it is convenient. It's all interlinked. All connected. To a single agenda. The climate bill topic is highly important because it cannot be passed into law at all costs. Here's a hint (it already HAS BEEN). this is why I suggest something is going on behind the scenes.
Learn how to take your sovereignty back people, learn about trust’s. No one can touch your property if placed within a trust that is set up properly, not government not hmrc not even the king can touch it. Peter wilson of Return to true democracy have great knowledge of this, do your research people sovereign project is worth a look too