Killing the oil industry before the alternatives are in place and capable of replacing it is like tearing down the house you're living in before building the new one... It is just stupid.
It’s political. Democrats want to knee cap American energy and usher in unsustainable green energy purely because of political alliances. They are trying to centralize power indefinitely and it’s a serious national security risk. Our sovereignty is at stake.
It’s not stupid, it’s by design. Cripple a people, control the power and you can attempt to build some sort of dystopian utopia, leaving the majority to waste.
Ted Cruz. People may have stupid petty issues with him but the man knows how government works. He can speak intelligently about any issue regarding our government.
"... we've been identifying the source of some of these results and making sure we're taking aggressive to address them." ... what she plans to do next. We're going to keep firing this SOBs until the morale improves.
@@JSomerled I can guarantee that's the case. We had a similar anonymous survey at my previous job, and some people were (rightfully) scathing. Within a matter of weeks they were brought into the manager's office to explain themselves.
"Because I was hired to check diversity boxes and my ideology and I have no ability to do this job" would be the honest answer...but as the survey notes, she's not known for honesty and integrity.
I mean.. Her background is Asian. Bet she did better in school in whatever she did than most politicians currently in office.. Including some ex presidents. While we are on the topic of favoritism and potentially nepotism.
@@russty5692 Funnily enough, I actually wasn't even talking about Trump in this case. And definitely applies across both sides of the political spectrum.
This is like when 90% of L.A. prosecutors say Gascon sucks, and then nothing happens. You'd have to actually be capable of shame, to be shamed into doing your job better. They don't care, so the criticism means nothing. They just go home and tell themselves it's just the evil blah blah people out to get them, so it doesn't count.
She says "we have been diligently identifying the sources of the results. . ." another words - WE ARE WORKING HARD TO ROOT OUT THE DESENTERS and WHISTLE BLOWERS that DON'T Respect My Power and Authority!
I caught that too. These types of surveys are supposed to be anonymous. In fact, most of them state that upfront. We all know that’s not true as it is fairly easy to drill down.
I'm a federal employee that takes the same survey, for a different department. My name is nowhere included, but my position coupled location is enough to single me out, much less adding age range, gender and race, which is required on the survey.
Exactly. Usually the people in positions of authority with low scores claim they need to know more about why their scores are so low when it is completely obvious from the survey itself and that it is not the sources of the survey that need to addressed but he targets of the survey that need to be addressed.
Why don't they do this for the Postal Service? I've never seen one question about why the moral is so low and they can't even get employee's to take the surveys let alone keep new hires more than a week or two.
We are pressured to take the management surveys. In the past no matter what the answer they use it against us during contract negotiations. We are advised by our local unions to not fill out the surveys
Thank you for getting this kind of thing out. We are starting to see and hear from government employees in all areas about their discomfort with they way the administration is being run. Whistle blowers, surveys, resignations, inability to recruit... I especially liked the discomfort of Mrs Klobushar who had she done her job as MN AG George Floyd would be alive because the police officer with 17 complaints against him would have been removed. Let's hope and pray for everyone especially the Biden administration to see the light and do the right things for everyone not just themselves. My opinion
This is why everyone I know from my 26 years of military service hated command climate surveys. "We've been diligently identifying the source of these results and making sure we are taking steps to address them" Is that the issues causing the problems or the people reporting them against you that are having aggressive steps taken to remedy?
This is what happens when you appoint a 32yo to lead an organization that has 1,123 employees. Let’s say she finished her masters at 24yo, that means she’s only had 7 years to gain leadership experience. That’s hardly enough for such an important role. She’s unqualified.
Her age is not the issue. Founders of Facebook, Apple, and Microsoft (to name only a few) were much younger when they founded and subsequently ran their respective companies.
And Congress is a perfect example of what happens when people are hired based on the group they associate with, the quality of the lies they campaign under and the size of their bank account, instead of competence. How often do you scrutinise candidates at the ballot box and vote based on individual competency over party association?
@@hooterville1863 No mate. The party an individual chooses to associate with is a mere technicality. Voting blindly based on parties is far more negligent than hiring this woman based on immutable traits. Indeed if everyone stopped voting along party lines and instead voted for candidates based solely on their competence and personal platform, there wouldn't be tick boxes forcing organisations to hire based on such immutable characteristics at all. If you're looking to blame someone for the state of the country, look no further than voters whom describe themselves by the party they blindly vote for each election regardless of what party that might be. "Democrat voters" and "Republican voters" (better described as fanboys) are entirely to blame for all of the corruption, division and problems in the country with a political solution. Democracy only exists in swing voters, everyone else is a problem.
@@tjmarx If we had a multiple party government, we would be able to vote based on individual competency. Under the current system, there are not enough people with integrity to overcome the partisanship that prevents nearly any progress.
@@KM-jp2wx A two party preferred system has it's drawbacks, but it doesn't specify which two parties have to hold majority. There are more parties and more candidates in each election beyond simply Republican and Democrat. Sometimes the best candidate will be from one of the current majority parties, but it won't always be. Sometimes they might not even belong to a party at all If the majority of voters, vote for the best individual candidate based on competency, not their party then you create a genuine situation where whom the majority parties are could change, and even if it doesn't such a situation would be heard loud and clear in Washington. That is the ONLY path to change. There is no other.
@@docsavage8640 Then there would be a lot of people referenced as "fuckwit" from both sides of the house, and the remainder referenced as "smarmy little weasel".
When you look at her she REALLY doesn't see herself as the problem - she is totally clueless to the point of showing contempt. Unbelievable! Wake Up America!!
"Identifying the source of some of these results and taking aggressive steps to address them." sounds like going through and removing the people who gave the negative survey responses instead of identifying why they gave the negative response in the first place.
Wow so called professional people using ah ah ah ah before every sentence is insane. Any high school drop out can take over any of these guys jobs easily. Ah ah ah ah
You can bet if the employee survey results don’t improve they will no longer be made available by the Office of Personnel Management, at least not made available to Republican politicians, conservative media sources, or in response to FOIA requests
One is a veteran of the 101st Airborne who saw active duty and was deployed in a war zone after which he was elected to the House, then the Senate. The other was a 'research fellow' for a former FTC commisioner before Biden wanted to tick off some boxes on youth, gender, religion, etc. The difference could not be more stark.
It’s the % that approves of this administration and direction the US is heading that concerns most of us. This woman proves that there are way too many “departments” in guvment
They hold these hearing and nothing ever gets done. We need fundamental rebuild our way of governess. DC is totally out of control. Throw the whole thing out the window and start over, we have a base but there are too many bureaucrats and titles that just cash a check.
Let’s talk about the Congress, Senate and Oval Office now on the topic of antitrust and anti-kickback laws that normal businesses such as mine are required to adhere to. What? Is that crickets I hear? I thought so. Never mind.
When she says we’re addressing it, she means that those employees who won’t give her better ratings will be removed by any means necessary. Mr Cantor probably paid everyone off and forgot what he was talking about already. “Oh right, I forget my job isn’t to do questionable things, and that that is supposedly “illegal” and “unethical” or whatever… cool I’m doing a thing right congressman said so.”
Finding the Sources of these results.... Ummmmm.... That COULD mean firing those that complained. I'm sure that is not what she meant, but..... Just saying.
Killing the oil industry before the alternatives are in place and capable of replacing it is like tearing down the house you're living in before building the new one... It is just stupid.
It’s political. Democrats want to knee cap American energy and usher in unsustainable green energy purely because of political alliances. They are trying to centralize power indefinitely and it’s a serious national security risk. Our sovereignty is at stake.
It’s not stupid, it’s by design. Cripple a people, control the power and you can attempt to build some sort of dystopian utopia, leaving the majority to waste.
Like going parachuting and thinking the parachute wasn't necessary to take long
Exactly!
Exactly right....they know it, but this is a push for this global greenie krap.
Tom Cotton would make an outstanding Senate Majority Leader.
Him or Jim Jordan
@@j.d.1488
Jim Jordan is not in the Senate
Ted Cruz. People may have stupid petty issues with him but the man knows how government works. He can speak intelligently about any issue regarding our government.
So does cocaine mitch, look where that got us
@@phk121 yes my bad. Thanks for correction.
Jim for speak of house.
"... we've been identifying the source of some of these results and making sure we're taking aggressive to address them." ... what she plans to do next. We're going to keep firing this SOBs until the morale improves.
Next survey might not be as anonymous as the employs think
Don't you know it!
@@JSomerled I can guarantee that's the case. We had a similar anonymous survey at my previous job, and some people were (rightfully) scathing. Within a matter of weeks they were brought into the manager's office to explain themselves.
The Soviet Army did the same thing, shooting Soldiers until Morale improved. They ran out of Soldiers ...
"Because I was hired to check diversity boxes and my ideology and I have no ability to do this job" would be the honest answer...but as the survey notes, she's not known for honesty and integrity.
i love the doc savage books
I mean.. Her background is Asian. Bet she did better in school in whatever she did than most politicians currently in office.. Including some ex presidents. While we are on the topic of favoritism and potentially nepotism.
@Pasan TDS alive and well!!!
@@russty5692 Funnily enough, I actually wasn't even talking about Trump in this case. And definitely applies across both sides of the political spectrum.
Affirmative action hire.
Watch her try to pull the victim card.
This is like when 90% of L.A. prosecutors say Gascon sucks, and then nothing happens. You'd have to actually be capable of shame, to be shamed into doing your job better. They don't care, so the criticism means nothing. They just go home and tell themselves it's just the evil blah blah people out to get them, so it doesn't count.
I'm pretty sure that's how most of the radical progressive movement operates. 'Everybody who disagrees with me is evil'.
"We have been aggressively hunting down those that disagree with me and dealing with them."
Bingo!!
Such an underrated statement of truth! Thank You
They will be publicly sorted into racists, nazis and extremists
She says "we have been diligently identifying the sources of the results. . ." another words - WE ARE WORKING HARD TO ROOT OUT THE DESENTERS and WHISTLE BLOWERS that DON'T Respect My Power and Authority!
I caught that too. These types of surveys are supposed to be anonymous. In fact, most of them state that upfront. We all know that’s not true as it is fairly easy to drill down.
I'm a federal employee that takes the same survey, for a different department. My name is nowhere included, but my position coupled location is enough to single me out, much less adding age range, gender and race, which is required on the survey.
Exactly. Usually the people in positions of authority with low scores claim they need to know more about why their scores are so low when it is completely obvious from the survey itself and that it is not the sources of the survey that need to addressed but he targets of the survey that need to be addressed.
Identifying the people that completed the survey and taking steps to deal with them Id what she meant, I’m sure.
"Senator, we'll be taking aggressive steps by sacking everyone who gives me a bad rating."
That’s very the most likely action they’d take!
Pathetic cut and paste troll busy on this thread!!!
Amy Klobuchar- The one that killed George Floyd
Xi did it.
Sure did in my opinion
The one that killed George Floyd was the drug dealer who sold him the drugs
Questions about polling about her integrity and honesty and fails to answer the question. Can't imagine why the results suck.
@mudbucket 16 Please see my comments on this thread.😉
Why don't they do this for the Postal Service? I've never seen one question about why the moral is so low and they can't even get employee's to take the surveys let alone keep new hires more than a week or two.
We are pressured to take the management surveys. In the past no matter what the answer they use it against us during contract negotiations. We are advised by our local unions to not fill out the surveys
@@josephdalonges8718 and that’s an issue that should be addressed
The USPS sux. I worked there as a contractor for four years. Their hiring practices are a joke.
Equity equals unqualified to many times.
They use honorable pretty lighty
Another of Biden's picks based on diversity.
Nah Biden only picked her cause the progressives pushed her cause she wants to break up Amazon and the rest of big tech
"The beatings will continue to until your morale improves."
Thank you for getting this kind of thing out. We are starting to see and hear from government employees in all areas about their discomfort with they way the administration is being run. Whistle blowers, surveys, resignations, inability to recruit... I especially liked the discomfort of Mrs Klobushar who had she done her job as MN AG George Floyd would be alive because the police officer with 17 complaints against him would have been removed. Let's hope and pray for everyone especially the Biden administration to see the light and do the right things for everyone not just themselves. My opinion
Thank you, Senator Cotton. 🇺🇸. WPS.
She literally said “we’re identifying the survey takers and corrective action will be taken”… TRANSLATION: those Employees will be FIRED.
This is why everyone I know from my 26 years of military service hated command climate surveys. "We've been diligently identifying the source of these results and making sure we are taking steps to address them"
Is that the issues causing the problems or the people reporting them against you that are having aggressive steps taken to remedy?
It sounds very parroted by these politicians.
Don't worry Senator, she said she's taking it "seriously." Which is code for she doesn't know what TF she's talking about.
This is what happens when you appoint a 32yo to lead an organization that has 1,123 employees. Let’s say she finished her masters at 24yo, that means she’s only had 7 years to gain leadership experience. That’s hardly enough for such an important role. She’s unqualified.
Her age is not the issue. Founders of Facebook, Apple, and Microsoft (to name only a few) were much younger when they founded and subsequently ran their respective companies.
Unqualified, as are the people that ushered her into the position...con artists are running law enforcement... Thankfully,god is in control!
@@AaBbCcDdEeF When did their companies become as powerful and complex as the FTC?
@@mhjasinski do your own research.
You are right. She was uneducated in college. She definitely does not have real life experience.
This woman is the perfect example of what happens when people are hired based on their race and sex instead of competence
And Congress is a perfect example of what happens when people are hired based on the group they associate with, the quality of the lies they campaign under and the size of their bank account, instead of competence.
How often do you scrutinise candidates at the ballot box and vote based on individual competency over party association?
@@tjmarx Its a rare scenario that i would vote for a tradcon RINO or a neoLib but the party a person chooses to associate with is a valid data point.
@@hooterville1863 No mate. The party an individual chooses to associate with is a mere technicality.
Voting blindly based on parties is far more negligent than hiring this woman based on immutable traits. Indeed if everyone stopped voting along party lines and instead voted for candidates based solely on their competence and personal platform, there wouldn't be tick boxes forcing organisations to hire based on such immutable characteristics at all.
If you're looking to blame someone for the state of the country, look no further than voters whom describe themselves by the party they blindly vote for each election regardless of what party that might be.
"Democrat voters" and "Republican voters" (better described as fanboys) are entirely to blame for all of the corruption, division and problems in the country with a political solution. Democracy only exists in swing voters, everyone else is a problem.
@@tjmarx If we had a multiple party government, we would be able to vote based on individual competency. Under the current system, there are not enough people with integrity to overcome the partisanship that prevents nearly any progress.
@@KM-jp2wx A two party preferred system has it's drawbacks, but it doesn't specify which two parties have to hold majority. There are more parties and more candidates in each election beyond simply Republican and Democrat. Sometimes the best candidate will be from one of the current majority parties, but it won't always be. Sometimes they might not even belong to a party at all
If the majority of voters, vote for the best individual candidate based on competency, not their party then you create a genuine situation where whom the majority parties are could change, and even if it doesn't such a situation would be heard loud and clear in Washington.
That is the ONLY path to change. There is no other.
lengths they are going to take her down is ridiculous
She's a novice. Need adults in such positions
Yeah, a more experienced far-left Democrat would be WAY better at making shit up. Or blame shifting, Or denying. Or plain old blatant Lying.
Ouchie.
Why do they keep using "honorable" to label these obviously not honorable people?
Tradition. Imagine if they addressed these people referencing their actual character
@@docsavage8640 Then there would be a lot of people referenced as "fuckwit" from both sides of the house, and the remainder referenced as "smarmy little weasel".
Corporations need to stick to their mission statements and leave politicians to the politics and the people who vote for them.
I noticed Kaulobachar doesn't have that swarmy condescending look anymore, hopefully she gets outsted!
Her hair is constantly in her eye.
They must get coached and trained on how to side step direct questions and avoid taking any responsibility.
By a "sinagogue of satan" perhaps?
Aggressive steps?? That sounds threatening!
I'd cringe for Kahn but she doesn't seem too bothered by it.
She’s like Lois Lerner. At the end of the day she will STILL get her money and her government benefits. Even if she is fired.
Just another job for a 'box ticker.'
Corporations using as much resources as possibly to buy these fake comments
When you look at her she REALLY doesn't see herself as the problem - she is totally clueless to the point of showing contempt. Unbelievable! Wake Up America!!
I wonder if anyone in this comment section knew anything about Khan, or if theyre just reading the room lol.
Crazy
That compliment was very well placed
They should all have to answer every question!
"Identifying the source of some of these results and taking aggressive steps to address them." sounds like going through and removing the people who gave the negative survey responses instead of identifying why they gave the negative response in the first place.
Wow so called professional people using ah ah ah ah before every sentence is insane. Any high school drop out can take over any of these guys jobs easily. Ah ah ah ah
Um and ash is taught in speech classes now.
Speaking as a Brit, I'd just like to congratulate America on having an administration even more hopelessly incompetent and corrupt than ours! WWG1WGA
Forbes really doesn’t like the FTC. Her and Hawley actually had a great back and forth about antitrust and big tech.
How? This is straight up uncut video from inside as they are talking. This is called reporting, remember that?
Perfect Time.
The beatings will continue until moral increases?
Just because my staff says I am incompetent does not mean I am, they’re incompetent, and probably copied each other’s answers!
Diversity Hire
That should shut the left up right there! Sadly, it won't!
President Trump we need you back now!!!
You can bet if the employee survey results don’t improve they will no longer be made available by the Office of Personnel Management, at least not made available to Republican politicians, conservative media sources, or in response to FOIA requests
Her face!
Angry brown princess with far more esteem than humility…….what could go wrong?
affirmative action at its finest
ESG has to go!
Thank God for leaders like Mr. Cotton holding these ESG lunatics!
👍 👍 Senator Cotton!
His next question should have been "why do you need more time to look into this. Were you unaware that this was happening and why were you unaware?"
That's the question the American people have been asking republicans for 6 years.
Come On January !
"Because I'm a woman!!! OBviously. Duh!"
Yea..... like really... I don't get asked these questions in the valley....
We’re looking into it. We take it seriously. We have a plan moving forward…same answers from every liberal
She looks like she's fresh out of college...geez
Got to love the tap dance ?
When she said 'Tenure' I immediately identified her as 'Incompetent'.
No she is lying she will go after their employees
why a young girl like this is responsible for so much..........
She's what's known as ''a useful idiot''. She'll mindlessly do as she's told, parrot the rhetoric and never attempt to grow a brain.
She doesn't give a crap. Look at the smirk on her face.
My God is she just out of kindergarten
This young women is unqualified to say the least.
Look at the beak on that thing, Yikes!!!!!!!
If she 'took the results very seriously', she'd resign.
Thanks Senator for your research on my abilities. That's the same BS the PM from Canada answers when confronted . Another on the wrong side of Hx.
Play ball with the Senior “Leaders” or lose your Career ? Federal employees ( other than LEADERS don’t seem to have much of a choice - do they ? 😔
They should have a hearing on the uselessness of hearings
She means that they are planing retaliation on the employee
survey is off atleast 75% right from the get go wouldnt put there capabilities to more them .05% in leadership for demacrats!
Replacement in full effect.
This is what happens when you put an activist is charge of real responsibility
Seriously? Extremely Seriously? Totally Completely Extremely Seriously? Do you? Wow!
One is a veteran of the 101st Airborne who saw active duty and was deployed in a war zone after which he was elected to the House, then the Senate. The other was a 'research fellow' for a former FTC commisioner before Biden wanted to tick off some boxes on youth, gender, religion, etc. The difference could not be more stark.
Glad I don't work for her.
Hey Forbes. AK = Alaska. AR = Arkansas.
She is a diverse choice for the position.
Now we know where the word Con job came from.
It’s the % that approves of this administration and direction the US is heading that concerns most of us. This woman proves that there are way too many “departments” in guvment
We’ve been taking steps to identify cancel and Eliminate any dissenting opinions because that’s what we do here on the left 😁
Indeed!
Gee? What changed from 2020 to 2021? Seems like EVERYTHING has gone downhill all at the same time. What a mystery 🙄
They hold these hearing and nothing ever gets done. We need fundamental rebuild our way of governess. DC is totally out of control. Throw the whole thing out the window and start over, we have a base but there are too many bureaucrats and titles that just cash a check.
I can see the AOC in her to be strong.
Tell me she's a equity hire without telling me she's a equity hire 🤦
She is incompetent and her people know it. Fire her
Let’s talk about the Congress, Senate and Oval Office now on the topic of antitrust and anti-kickback laws that normal businesses such as mine are required to adhere to. What? Is that crickets I hear? I thought so. Never mind.
When she says we’re addressing it, she means that those employees who won’t give her better ratings will be removed by any means necessary.
Mr Cantor probably paid everyone off and forgot what he was talking about already.
“Oh right, I forget my job isn’t to do questionable things, and that that is supposedly “illegal” and “unethical” or whatever… cool I’m doing a thing right congressman said so.”
Finding the Sources of these results.... Ummmmm.... That COULD mean firing those that complained. I'm sure that is not what she meant, but..... Just saying.
Her face.
Who hasn't fired her? And why not? She is clearly noy capable of fulfilling her basic job duties.
We are looking closely at any employee that doesn't fit our socialist agenda,,then we streamline ze rank and file and embed for future use
Why does yours? 🤣😂
KAAAAAAAHN!
Holy Cow. She's almost a child. I seriously doubt she has ever held any real job and has never been a manager.