Nuremberg Day 84 Part 2 (translated captions)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 сен 2024
- This is a continuation of the cross-examination by Robert H. Jackson of lead defendant Hermann Goering on March 18, 1946. The testimony covered the leadership principle's of Hitler, his policy to never negotiate and the continuing loyalty of his closest officials.
For further information, see www.roberthjack...
Man, Herman Goering was on another level of intelligence & stubbornness. Even in court fighting for his life, he remains very firm in his beliefs. Imagine how he was in power.
It's a reflection of the sad state of our culture that so few people are interested in documented history like this
You took the words out of my mouth only 5,000 and something views, for such an important time in current history
@@changopardomuzik4953 we are living in the golden age of dark ages. That’s why. People would rather worship degenerates like rap artists who graduated from ghettos or pursue TikTok fame. To seek self gratification and not the pursuit of knowledge and education; unethical behaviour. Disgusting contaminated society.
@@freckleheckler6311 I agree they turn everything upside down, make the bad look good, and the good look bad.
@@changopardomuzik4953 Not unlike German society in the 1920s. Worship of money, and general moral degeneracy. Interesting times are coming.
@@freckleheckler6311 Rap stars? What about rock stars, isn't that who you worship?
As today the americans don't have the culture to deal with gangsters like this. The questions are completely unprepared or thought through carefully. He is no match for goering.
I can only imagine the pressure for the translators to be as accurate as possible.
Jackson went round the Houses about a thousand times with Goering, it was the British Prosecutors who finally nailed him, he played with Jackson.
Can you explain this more? How did the British prosecutors nail Goering?
Because Maxwell-Fyfe knew his brief and focused his cross-examination very tightly.
video appears to be edited, there is more dialogue in the transcripts than we see here
Where can that be found???
Why is the prosecutor making long STATEMENTS instead of asking questions??
Is this a particular style to make a statement them follow up with a vague question like
"Didn't you? " or "wasn't it?"
It sounds like a terrible way to pin down someone on a particular point
Given the enormity of the charge, a basis had to be established on which to rest all the evidence. The result was preordained, so it was basically a show trial.
@@jude999 ok .. i can fully understand he needed to state "why the court has authority " but I think the prosecutor could have done a better job "pinning him down" ... They way he posed questions left alot of room for him to wiggle around the answer
WHICH HE DID 👍
This was the first time a new technology was being used and it was from IBM, its whole purpose was to translate into real-time all the statements from the prosecutor, defendants and judges. It has been said that this new microphone technology had speeded up the trials at least 4 times. The speaker would see a yellow light near his headset which would tell him to slow down, or a red light meaning to stop and repeat the statement for the translater to do his job correct!
Say what you will, but, these guys had balls & for the most part stuck to their beliefs.....I don't agree or condone them but, you can see why they were a force to be reckoned with!!!!
I see how different the mentality of the Germans was from the Americans’ in terms of politics and government. They could never understand each other.
It’s almost like Jackson was trying to get him off 😂😂
Was that laughter I heard at the end, if so for what?
Wow....
Goering hoped the war was going to come to a stalemate oh yeah right 🤣🤣🤣
He was as stupid as Hitler.
I wondered where AOC got the idea for “lists“ of Trump supporters. It is a negative testament that so few people have watched this. I am confident that the housewives of Beverly Hills, The Kardashians, etc. get millions of hits, and the recent history of the world gets so few.. Well if they’re not interested, they are doomed to repeat it, they deserve it.
we are living in the golden age of dark ages. That’s why. People would rather worship degenerates like rap artists who graduated from ghettos or pursue TikTok fame. To seek self gratification and not the pursuit of knowledge and education; unethical behaviour. Disgusting contaminated society.
Hmm, how does one watch a WW2 trial from 1946, and automatically think AOC and Trump? Wth. I’m republican, i’m not dumb enough to judge one, based off, politics, to rule one as good, and the other as bad. You live in a democracy without the other half, you lose that. Questioning that, is the exact danger you are watching on this trial…AOC herself is a brainwashed individual, how one says Trump, and not also have Clinton on a list, is really bizarre…Wrong is wrong, no matter what party…
Pozrel som film Vzostup a koniec WW 2⃣ kde na začiatku Hitler od bral chlieb 🥪 a neskôr prišli Investori Firmy
Yes... when a country kidnaps/kills people, sends them to forced labor camps, and seizes their businesses and possessions that can indeed "lift them out of poverty"... damn sociopath...
Isnt that how the U.S. got rich: seizing Native American land, kidnapping millions of africans forcing them to forced labor for 300 years lol Turns out they the richest nation on earth now, USA sociopath?
He openly said that this was lie and Yes comunist were enemy of state and most of comunist were jewish i dislike comunist more than anything where they come they leave empty souls and empty country like they did with mine