Battle of Chaldiran - Ottomans vs Safavids (1514)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 июн 2024
- In the year 1514, on the Plains of Chaldiran in modern-day NW Iran, the forces of the Ottoman Sultan Selim would meet the army of the surging Shah Ismail of the Safavids.
The result of the battle determined which of these two dynasties would become the dominant power in the region and even go on to become a world power.
- Become a Patron for as little as a dollar a month to vote on upcoming and keep the movement going!
www.patreon.com/user?u=12397811
FREE NEWSLETTER:
mailchi.mp/a69f93be6c66/hikma...
Massive thank you to our Patreons:
Omar
Farid
Ibrahim
Hamza
Ari
Ankit
Joshua
Visit our website:
hikmahistory.com/
- Join our social media community:
Twitter:
/ hikmahistory
Instagram:
/ hikmahistory
Facebook:
/ hikmahistory
Facebook group:
/ hikma. .
#BattleofChaldiran #OttomanHistory #SafavidHistory
Music used includes:
Doug Maxwell - Arabian Nightfall (Sting)
• Arabian Nightfall (Sti...
Kevin MacLeod - Faceoff
• Kevin MacLeod ~ Faceoff
If any of the images or songs are yours, please let me know I will amend them. Please don't report me straight away!
Great video.thanks for video..
Thank you!
What would a Persian-dominated Middle East look like?
Shi'a Islam would be dominant
@@historysquad Perhaps...
The inroads into the Europe ottomans made would have been minimal. Ottomans were kinda obsessed with Europe. A weaker turkey would mean a weaker push into europe
@@historysquad we dont want your pagan
There was allready a Persian dominated middle east and that was the Sunni Abbasids and Islamic Sunni Golden Age
Thank you
Great video as usual!
Thank you!
Interesting consideration of what might have happened had the battle gone the other way.
If that is true, why Ottomans couldn't hold on to Tabriz and retreated back almost to Van?
@@sirazi11 What do you think?
Turkey would not exist today
As an outsider looking in, here are my two cents: the Ottomans lost many European conflicts preceding this but learned one thing. The superiority of the infantry-artillery combination over heavy cavalry from the Christian sectarian wars, which the Persians had to learn the hard way (at the Battle of Chalidran itself). The Marathas in India also learned about this the hard way by the British, even when Benoît de Boigne advised Shinde of its superiority and thus advised the Indians to keep the battles naval, because they'd lose land battles. Something which could've happened had the Nawab of Oudh (now Bangladesh) not completely fucked it.
I think, had Shah Ismail had more experience with European wars, or had some European military advisors on his war table, his forces would have prevailed. Generally though, I am biased and am quite an Iranophile and thus going to look at the battles that entail Iran from a pro-Iranian lens anyway.
Apparently one of his advisors did suggest that they attack immediately at nightfall rather than wait, but Ismail thought that'd be too cowardly.
Very nice way of narrating history brother.
Am shia muslim and it is interesting how shah Ismail came to power.
Thanks!
If you are Persian then all your ancestors were brutally murdered by that pig Ismail the first. Remember that you were only forced to become shia.
@@zccau2316 well if you say that, the Sassanian perisans were forced th become muslim in the first place....
Shia is not a Muslim
@@habibkhan9964 your mom is not muslim
nice
Thanks mate
Yes! Another great video from a fellow RUclipsr! 😍😊😍😊😍
Thanks dude!
Great video, and research. The Qizilbash would be a good topic for a video: they're just on the outside of the period I know best, so I've seen their name around enough times but their history is something I'd like to learn more of.
Aswell: I saw somewhere that you had a few of your videos copyright striked: you are free to use any of my drawings for your videos, if you ever require
@@TheJackmeisterMongolHistory What do you think about a collab on the Qizilbash?
Yeah man, that's great I'm sure it'll come in handy.
@@HikmaHistory Definitely interested, and a good learning opportunity for me: a chance to brush up my post-Mongol knowledge. Though will definitely need to do some reading. Can you recommend any sources to start?
@@TheJackmeisterMongolHistory I have a good book on the latter period (17th century Iran) but I'm sure that could offer us other sources:
The waning of the Qizilbash : the spiritual and the temporal in seventeenth century Iran / Kathryn Babayan.
But, the Ottomans and Safavids were almost equal in number. However you said that the Ottoman Army was much greater in number and you also did not mention the fact that the Ottomans arrived after a long, exhausting journey and hence had lesser freshness and strenght. Moreover, you also did not mention the fact that Ismail had demolished Sunni Mosques and graves and almost completely massacarred the Sunnis of Iran. The battle broke out due to this and the reasons mentioned in the video. There was also no mention of the letter that Selim wrote to Ismail the gist of which was to return to rigtheousness, reconstruct broken sunni property, allow religious freedom and return territories seized from The Ottomans in his father Bayezid's reign. The video is overall good, but please pay more attention to minor but major details as they totally change the perspective of the event. I am sorry of this comment sounds a bit rude :)
Very epic and super relatable.
Thank you
Correction chaldiran is in modern day southeast Turkey not northwest Iran
they're the same
a turkoman army used turkic battle tactics against a gun powder turkic army, so an overwhelming defeat was inevitable for safavids. at that time ottomans was clashing against nearly more then half of europe, safavid empire just a military training exercise for the ottomans, also safavid army was training board for the ottoman cannons.
Ottoman were gays 😂
Hidden between canons & guns ..
They never win war like a real male fighters 😎🤟😂
Safavi were ottoman nightmare 😂😂😎🤟
Fews hundreds wahabi tribes man from desert end ottoman cult 😂😂😂😎🤟
Last sultan was on pay roll of Hyderabad Nizam ( who was Shia ) 😂😎🤟
@A A
Safavi will erased u all ....
Bring u true Islam of Prophet Mohammed & his family only ....
Same like happen with some ottoman lover traitors in Persia 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@GaziFerozLulu110 Safavids are not disciplined
Safavid fuck ottomon and they entire army are not qizilbush safavid lost because iran main army is fighting with turkman and uzbek in north and centerall asia
@@theark4833 lol
enemies:Osmani in the west,Uzbek Shaybani in North East,and Mughal in the East
What ethnicity is safawid
@@syedkhalil9630 safavid founded by:azerbaijani/azeri turkish,persian,turkmen,kurdish and shiite arabs from iraq
@@syedkhalil9630 Turkic
Mughals were on good terms though, mostly. Babur's rise came as a result of the failed campaign initiated by him and one of Shah Ismail's commanders.
No kurds? Its just sad how much we suffered and no one noticed us
Peace bro ✌
1. Shah Abbas' famous palace historian Iskender Bey Muneshi (1560-1634) notes that Sheikh Safi is called a Turkish youth in his work. In this work, it is stated that during the trip to Shiraz, Persian sheikhs called Sheikh Safi as a Turkish youth.
Emir Abdullah addresses Sheikh Sâfî as follows:
-O Turkish youth! Thanks to your diligence, diligence and high deeds, your grace has reached our eyes until now.
According to the same work, Persian sheikhs are not the only people who call Sheikh Sâfî a Turkish youth. Sheikh Zahid Geylani also mentions Sheikh Safi as a Turkish youth.
1666-1694 `` There is a work called / Silsiletü'n-Neseb-i Safevîyye / written on the lineage of the Safavids. Its author is Hüseyin Zahidî, son of Pizade Şeyh Abdal, descendant of Sheikh Zahid, who is the leader of Sheikh Safi. In both parts of this valuable work, Şeyh Sâfî was known as the Turkish piri.
It is understood from the sources that the native language of Sheikh Sâfî in the black magazine, which is considered one of the main books of the Safeviyye order, is Turkish.
It is clearly stated in the Kara Mecmua, which is considered as one of the main books of the Safeviyye order, that the native language of Sheikh Sâfî is Turkish and that his followers speak in this language.
The famous safvetü's-Safa, on the other hand, introduces himself as the Turkish son of Sheikh Sâfî, Turk.
“Pire Ahmed perniki Germrûdi told from Mevlana İsma'il (rh.a); he said: I was in the presence of Mawlana Izzeddin Merağı (rh.a.) and the sheikh (pbuh). He was busy with nice words. That twitter said, 'O community of caliphs! Pray to Hace Sadrettin that the throne of Sheikh Zahid and me, Turkoglu Turk, has won the throne for himself with his own power. ''
The same event is described in the Turkish translation of Safvetü's-Sâfâ in Sheikh Sâfî tezkiresin:
“Pire Ahmed of Bernik narrated; Who should be from Mawlana Ismail? He said: Marağalu Mevlana Izzeddin was the servant of Hazret-i Sheikh (k.s.) and His Holiness Sheikh (k.s.) was busy in the language-pezir word. In the middle of the word he said: Caliphs! Please pray to Hace Sadrettin who was the son of a Turk who took the throne of Sheikh Zahid and my menu place. ''
There is an anonymous safevi history book written in Persian in 1675-76 AD: / Târih-i Alemara-yı Shah İsma'il /
In this work, Eminüddin Cebrail, the father of Sheikh Safi, the ancestor of Shah Ismail and the founder of the Safavid order, is referred to as the Turkish dervish.
Some of the Safavid sources recorded Turkish youth for the ancestor of Shah Ismai, Sheikh Safi.
In his work titled Füthât-ı Şahî, heratlı İbrahim Emini, who is the historian of the Palace of Shah İsmail, is referred to as a Turkish piri and Turkish youth from Sheikh Sâfî.
Source baku school? If you think ismeal was turk go read tahmasb shahname and see he insult on turk
Azarbaygan it self is persian word
@Truth Seeker
MY interest in Shāh Ismā'īl's poetry was aroused thirty-six years ago, when from my Ahl-i Ḥaqq friends I learnt that the Khāṭu'ī mentioned in one of their hymns was no lessa person than the founder of the Ṣafavi dynasty: Khatā'ī-dä nāṭiq oldï, Türkistanïn pīri oldï “(Godhead) came to speech in the person of Khatā'ī, (who) became the pīr of the Turks (of Āzarbāyjān)”, according to the explanation given to me.
www.cambridge.org/core/journals/bulletin-of-the-school-of-oriental-and-african-studies/article/abs/poetry-of-shah-ismail-i/AFF46B11B7E30BA0FAEEE1612398DFDD
Music corrupts the video bro 😵
What do you mean?
@@HikmaHistory It's forbidden and documentary content should give focus to the words not the Music.
This narrative is not correct. It was Persian army that stopped the Ottoman forces at Chaldoran and pushed them back.
Here was the momentum and lessen to Ottomans that they never again looked eastward on their expansions.
Oh stfu ottomans held the capital tabriz for almost a year . Ottomans also took control of eastern anatolia and iraq from the safavids . Multiple attempts by safavids to take back lost territory was only partially successful under shah abbas and nader shah . But each time they held those territories all too briefly before losing again to the ottomans.
It was the safavids who got a rude awakening and a reality check after chaldiran and ismail never again tried to expand into the ottoman realm again.
If Ottomans had Tabriz under their control, then how did they retrieved back to Van?
Can u read ??
@@auror9792yes they did under shah abbas.
Shah Ismali underestimated the power and knowledge of Ottoman
@daniel mezrati
If ottoman was real man he would not hide behind canon & guns ..
This shows who much he fear from Ismail shah Safavi r.a the great...
Ottoman gays won physical but real man hero is Ismail shah Safavi
Shah Ismail or Nader Shah’s army was Shia Turks nothing persian about them
According to É. Á. Csató et al.,[33]A specific Turkic language was attested in Safavid Persia during the 16th and 17th centuries, a language that Europeans often called Persian Turkish ("Turc Agemi", "lingua turcica agemica"), which was a favourite language at the court and in the army because of the Turkic origins of the Safavid dynasty.
The Safavids were descended from a family of Turkmen Sufi sheikhs from Ardabil, in Azerbaijan.
www.davidmus.dk/en/collections/islamic/dynasties/safavids
The Ottoman,Mughal and Safavid dynasties all had Turkic roots and traced their provenance to the steppe.
(Cambridge University Press)
books.google.com.tr/books?id=5ky2CgAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Safavid+dynasty+cambridge+university+press&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjn0PCSmJXpAhXK_CoKHc2lDlcQ6AEINDAC#v=snippet&q=Roots&f=false
Religious overtones aside,in most other respects theirs was a typical turkish dynasty.
(Cambridge University Press)
books.google.com.tr/books?id=esnWJkYRCJ4C&printsec=frontcover&dq=Firearms:+A+Global+History+to+1700+-+Sayfa+115&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiW6sLHl6bpAhWnyqYKHcBRA80Q6AEIJTAA#v=onepage&q=Turkish%20dynasty&f=false
Ottoman eastward expansion was stalled by the rise of another Turkish dynasty, the Safavids, in Persia.
(Columbia University Press)
books.google.com.tr/books?id=pcwzCgAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Conflict,+Conquest,+and+Conversion:+Two+Thousand+Years+of+Christian+Missions+...&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiy29DtmKbpAhXDfZoKHVwpBAwQ6AEIKDAA#v=onepage&q=Turkish%20dynasty&f=false
At much the same time, two more great states arose, each led by migrant Turkish princes: the Safavid Empire of Iran, founded in 1500, and the Mughal Empire of India and Afghanistan,founded in 1526.
(Columbia University Press)
books.google.com.tr/books?id=Z013mXynh1wC&pg=PA72&dq=safavid+princes&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwilxZiLmabpAhXDxaYKHbZtAD04HhDoATADegQIARAW#v=onepage&q=safavid%20princes&f=false
The three Islamic empires of the early modern period - the Mughal, the Safavid, and the Ottoman - shared a common Turko-Mongolian heritage.
www.cambridge.org/core/books/time-in-early-modern-islam/safavid-mughal-and-ottoman-empires/9D55F0A0262017473EC8A9A7ED86C508/core-reader
*The Zands were the first dynasty of Iranian stock to rule after an interval of nearly a thousand years of Turkish rulers.“12*
richardfrye.org/files/The_Zands_in_Iran.pdf
*The Zand dynasty, which ruled Iran from 1751 to 1794 , was the first native Iranian regime in almost six hundred years, as opposed to the Turkic and Mongolian sovereigns who until then had governed the land.*
www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195305135.001.0001/acref-9780195305135-e-0866?rskey=x3ZJm4&result=11
The Safavid Empire had its roots in a Turkic dynastic line originating in Iranian Azerbaijan. [42]
(42)Cultural Sociology of the Middle East, Asia, and Africa: An Encyclopedia
editör: Andrea L. Stanton, Edward Ramsamy, Peter J. Seybolt, Carolyn M. Elliott
The early Safavid court retained its Turkic culture and language, but gradually transitioned to more Persian bureaucratic structure as successive Shahs came to power. Likewise, the legitimacy and symbolism of the thrown became more Persian as time passed. Shah Isma'il described himself as a descendant of the Prophet Mohammad and claimed to have royal Sasanian blood as well, but was still very much a Qizilbash leader.
projects.mcah.columbia.edu/nehasian/shahnamah/flash/text/safavid.pdf
Mazzaoui, Michel B; Canfield, Robert (2002). "Islamic Culture and Literature in Iran and Central Asia in the early modern period". Turko-Persia in Historical Perspective. Cambridge University Press. pp. 86-7. ISBN 978-0-521-52291-5. Safavid power with its distinctive Persian-Shi'i culture, however, remained a middle ground between its two mighty Turkish neighbors. The Safavid state, which lasted at least until 1722, was essentially a "Turkish" dynasty, with Azeri Turkish (Azerbaijan being the family's home base) as the language of the rulers and the court as well as the Qizilbash military establishment. Shah Ismail wrote poetry in Turkish. The administration nevertheless was Persian, and the Persian language was the vehicle of diplomatic correspondence (insha'), of belles-lettres (adab), and of history (tarikh).
*The Safavid Empire differed little from the earlier tribal Turkic and Mongol tribal confederations that had dominated much of the Middle East since the 11th century.*
www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199791279/obo-9780199791279-0185.xml
By the 16th century,the Caucasus was a battleground between the Sunni Ottoman Empire and the Turkic Shia Safavid Dynasty of Persia.
books.google.com.tr/books?id=1RWTIYXTM98C&pg=PA3&dq=OXFORDUNIVERSITYPRESS&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj2tbyH_cfrAhXySRUIHfVrCjEQ6AEwAHoECAAQAQ#v=onepage&q=&f=false
(Oxford University Press)
But the Safavids of the 10th/16th century must not be regarded as a kind of Persian national dynasty.
link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-94-010-3479-1_14
@@papazataklaattiranimam youngster, everything from China to the Mediterranean Sea and from Ghafghaaz to Most of North Africa DOES have Iranian cultural foot prints all over their history. HENCE the term Pan Iranian, buddy boy.
azri iran persan not turk
Sefavids were more turkish than the Ottoman turks u idiot
@@MrErkanergin u dont have any knowledge
@@MrErkanergin safavids kings were born in iran and their court language was persian
How come you do not mention Sultan Salim Killed two of his brothers and his father before he becomes Sultan. Also In that battle Iranians killed twice as much Turks as they did Persians. Shah Ismail also destroyed 250 of the Cannons of Turks which was known to be the strategic Marble of Warfare. the other Issue was that Selim was a sneaky person and he attacked without notifying Iranians which in the old days they would do the notification before fight.---------------Salim wanted to do a genocide of all Iranians. Before this war Shah Ismael captured and killed Sheibak Sheibani of the Ozbakestan which he would actually drink the blood of the people.
Qizilbash Turks and Ottoman Turks fought not persians lmao
@@papazataklaattiranimam Hey buddy, any body that lives in the ancient land of PERSIA we call them IRANIAN/Persian it does not matter what their tribe name is. AZARI people or anybody that speak AZARI IS NOT TURK. you go and read your history in Turkey and I read mine.
Shibanid Uzbek were TurkoMongol descent of Gengish Khan
Shaybani Khan death by Shah Ismail
@@papazataklaattiranimam lol
Persian vs Persian
🤣🤣🤣
Mal
Turk vs turk
Ne farsi mal şah ismail azerbaycan türkü
@@eraydemir8634 shia vs Sunni
In the battle of Chaldiran, the ratio of forces was 120,000 soldiers of the Ottoman Empire against 20,000 Safavid qizilbashs.The ratio of artillery was as follows: 100 heavy guns for the Ottomans against 3 guns for the qizilbashs.Jangevars (qizilbash's heavy cavalry) crushed the elite Ottoman infantry janissaries,but in support of the infantry, the the Ottomans sent their heavy cavalry - the sipahi. Sipahi could not stop the attacks of the jangevars and were defeated. Further jangevars's attack was stopped only by dense fire of the Ottoman heavy artillery.I do not think that Sultan Selim could be proud of such a "victory".Although after this "victory" the Ottomans entered the Safavid capital of Tabriz, but they could not hold there and had to retreat.Subsequently, the Safavid Shah Abbas the Great inflicted several heavy defeats on the Ottomans, after which the slow but certain decline of the Ottoman Empire began.
lol rambo iranians ;D
Iran was freed from the conquest of a new Alexander the great(Selim the Grim)
in fact
esram nor
Safavid dynasty began as turkish state
@@papazataklaattiranimam Safafids were turks (like Ottomans),not turkishs.Turks and turkishs are not the same.
Rüstəm Şahzadə same bro
Dear Hikma, you have the facts right but the context is a bit distorted and I hope it is not intentional. The true motivation of Saleem's Iran conquest was to form his empire: From his childhood he dreamed of re-uniting the muslim world under one government - his. This is why he overthrew his father Bayezid and killed two of his older brothers.
Savis being Shia was as a secondary issue and of course a tool to entice his army for a secterian war. Although Saleem won the war the Iranians fought so heroically that his further advance eastward was halted. He retained some territory but vacated most of it fearing entrapment.
Although Saleem may have won the physical battle, Ismael was the winner of the moral battle. He was kind hearted and ruled with justice and compassion. Saleem? Massacred all Shias in Turkey possibly the biggest human crime of history.
I thought Ashrqf Hotak, fought for Safavid and won the battle for him. But you didn't mention him!!!
You're off by about 2 centuries lol
Hotak Afghan👎
infighting has been the downfall of many since the days of Alexander. In this case, whatever sect the faith they believed in, it was both their downfalls to fight for differences and not put as much emphasis on technological innovation. Meanwhile Gutenberg invented the press and Europe steamed ahead. What is the moral of this recurring story ?
It was Sultan Salim who killed his own brothers and father and order to massacare Shias like today's isis. But the downhill was started for Iran and middle east since Chalderan battle since before the muslim countries were united against foreigners. After that battle, all middle east nations started to become the worse enemies against each other till today
So Middle Eastern countries weren't at war with each other prior to 1514?
@@HikmaHistory There were fight in the middle east since the humanity begun and the last war in human history (according to some references) will be there. Don't change my word please. But at the time of ottoman there was a public accepting rule among Muslims not to support attacking another Muslim country that is why Safavid couldn't expand their country toward initially weak kingdoms in their east and west and had to deliver their fights in northern countries and Othman had to push toward the west which was much more difficult task in compare to attack Islamic small kingdom but Sultan Salim broke that rule and first killed Muslims in his own territories by calling them out of Islam with sectarian excuses. King of Spain invited Shah Ismaeel to have mutual fight against Ottoman who killed and suffered many Spanish almost a years before Charlderan battle but he refused for the same reason. I hope you understood what I meant by saying Sultan Salim created a fire of hatreds which is still burring middle east and I don't know why you are insisting on purifying Salim?!! Where are you from?
@@KS-zq7zy this is some BS right here . Ismail massacred sunnis and turned persia which had been sunni for millenia into shia forcefully . But i guess all iranians like to rewrite history to best suit there ego.
@@auror9792 you should be very naive to accept what just you said. Love of Ahlol beit have been among Iranian from early centuries of Islam a nation can not be converted to any religion by force otherwise Othoman thugs could convert half of Euroup to Sunni but they couldnt
@Abbas Abdullah so?
What would happen if the ottomans had conquered modern day iran
Interesting question - perhaps Shi'ism would not be the dominant sect; there may have been linguistic changes as well.
Middle east would have been peaceful
@@khandarya100
No one would chant, Ayesha is terrorist
@@GaziFerozLulu110 I haven't seen worst people than you and your cult mates who have nothing to say except evil for people who have nothing to do with what is being discussed.
@@khandarya100
Ur holy mother , came to kill Muslims in #battels_of_Jamel ( camel) .....
Even yaudi & Christian didn't try to dare this
Great video please in urdu
I believe you do not know all the details of battle/war of Chaldiran. Sultan Selim had written letters to Shah Ismail the first that he did not have any intention to attack Iran or it’s territories. Shah Ismail left his Capital City of Tabriz toward south of Iran not knowing Sultan Salim and his massive army had already gone to Makron and killed thousands of Shia Muslims, and crossed Iranian borders sneakingly into Chaldiran...
Shah Ismail did not have time to gather a big enough army, but the men who went to defend their lands and borders fought bravely till the end. Sultan Selim and his troops did not last in Tabriz more than six months, and believe me no one consider him wise or brave...he killed his own two brothers to become Sultan and he murdered tens of thousands of Muslims accusing them of being Godless...
Yeah well ismail massacred sunnis in persia turning a country that was sunni for almost a millenia into shia .
He claimed to be Ali re-incarnate and said he was supernatural and invincible until he got bttfked by the ottomans at chaldiran . Also he exhumed the shirvanshahs at Baku and burnt them . He also turned the head of the uzbek khan into a jeweled wine goblet .
So really he was just a degenerate bent on carnage and destruction . Fortunately for the people of ME (outside iran) there was a boss like yavuz sultan selim to stop that sadistic fool.
Also leaving out some butthurt iranian like yourself many would consider sultan selim not only wise and brave but also a military genius and an inadvertent saviour from the safavids for the people of ME .
???
Safavids the greatest shia persian empire after Islam
Ottomans the greatest Sunni persian/Kurdish empire after islam
Your brain is smaller than fly poop💩
According to É. Á. Csató et al.,[33]A specific Turkic language was attested in Safavid Persia during the 16th and 17th centuries, a language that Europeans often called Persian Turkish ("Turc Agemi", "lingua turcica agemica"), which was a favourite language at the court and in the army because of the Turkic origins of the Safavid dynasty.
The Safavids were descended from a family of Turkmen Sufi sheikhs from Ardabil, in Azerbaijan.
www.davidmus.dk/en/collections/islamic/dynasties/safavids
The Ottoman,Mughal and Safavid dynasties all had Turkic roots and traced their provenance to the steppe.
(Cambridge University Press)
books.google.com.tr/books?id=5ky2CgAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Safavid+dynasty+cambridge+university+press&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjn0PCSmJXpAhXK_CoKHc2lDlcQ6AEINDAC#v=snippet&q=Roots&f=false
Religious overtones aside,in most other respects theirs was a typical turkish dynasty.
(Cambridge University Press)
books.google.com.tr/books?id=esnWJkYRCJ4C&printsec=frontcover&dq=Firearms:+A+Global+History+to+1700+-+Sayfa+115&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiW6sLHl6bpAhWnyqYKHcBRA80Q6AEIJTAA#v=onepage&q=Turkish%20dynasty&f=false
Ottoman eastward expansion was stalled by the rise of another Turkish dynasty, the Safavids, in Persia.
(Columbia University Press)
books.google.com.tr/books?id=pcwzCgAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Conflict,+Conquest,+and+Conversion:+Two+Thousand+Years+of+Christian+Missions+...&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiy29DtmKbpAhXDfZoKHVwpBAwQ6AEIKDAA#v=onepage&q=Turkish%20dynasty&f=false
At much the same time, two more great states arose, each led by migrant Turkish princes: the Safavid Empire of Iran, founded in 1500, and the Mughal Empire of India and Afghanistan,founded in 1526.
(Columbia University Press)
books.google.com.tr/books?id=Z013mXynh1wC&pg=PA72&dq=safavid+princes&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwilxZiLmabpAhXDxaYKHbZtAD04HhDoATADegQIARAW#v=onepage&q=safavid%20princes&f=false
The three Islamic empires of the early modern period - the Mughal, the Safavid, and the Ottoman - shared a common Turko-Mongolian heritage.
www.cambridge.org/core/books/time-in-early-modern-islam/safavid-mughal-and-ottoman-empires/9D55F0A0262017473EC8A9A7ED86C508/core-reader
*The Zands were the first dynasty of Iranian stock to rule after an interval of nearly a thousand years of Turkish rulers.“12*
richardfrye.org/files/The_Zands_in_Iran.pdf
*The Zand dynasty, which ruled Iran from 1751 to 1794 , was the first native Iranian regime in almost six hundred years, as opposed to the Turkic and Mongolian sovereigns who until then had governed the land.*
www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195305135.001.0001/acref-9780195305135-e-0866?rskey=x3ZJm4&result=11
The Safavid Empire had its roots in a Turkic dynastic line originating in Iranian Azerbaijan. [42]
(42)Cultural Sociology of the Middle East, Asia, and Africa: An Encyclopedia
editör: Andrea L. Stanton, Edward Ramsamy, Peter J. Seybolt, Carolyn M. Elliott
The early Safavid court retained its Turkic culture and language, but gradually transitioned to more Persian bureaucratic structure as successive Shahs came to power. Likewise, the legitimacy and symbolism of the thrown became more Persian as time passed. Shah Isma'il described himself as a descendant of the Prophet Mohammad and claimed to have royal Sasanian blood as well, but was still very much a Qizilbash leader.
projects.mcah.columbia.edu/nehasian/shahnamah/flash/text/safavid.pdf
Mazzaoui, Michel B; Canfield, Robert (2002). "Islamic Culture and Literature in Iran and Central Asia in the early modern period". Turko-Persia in Historical Perspective. Cambridge University Press. pp. 86-7. ISBN 978-0-521-52291-5. Safavid power with its distinctive Persian-Shi'i culture, however, remained a middle ground between its two mighty Turkish neighbors. The Safavid state, which lasted at least until 1722, was essentially a "Turkish" dynasty, with Azeri Turkish (Azerbaijan being the family's home base) as the language of the rulers and the court as well as the Qizilbash military establishment. Shah Ismail wrote poetry in Turkish. The administration nevertheless was Persian, and the Persian language was the vehicle of diplomatic correspondence (insha'), of belles-lettres (adab), and of history (tarikh).
*The Safavid Empire differed little from the earlier tribal Turkic and Mongol tribal confederations that had dominated much of the Middle East since the 11th century.*
www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199791279/obo-9780199791279-0185.xml
By the 16th century,the Caucasus was a battleground between the Sunni Ottoman Empire and the Turkic Shia Safavid Dynasty of Persia.
books.google.com.tr/books?id=1RWTIYXTM98C&pg=PA3&dq=OXFORDUNIVERSITYPRESS&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj2tbyH_cfrAhXySRUIHfVrCjEQ6AEwAHoECAAQAQ#v=onepage&q=&f=false
(Oxford University Press)
But the Safavids of the 10th/16th century must not be regarded as a kind of Persian national dynasty.
link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-94-010-3479-1_14
@@papazataklaattiranimam this all theory source I can send 100 source for iranian origin they clear them as iranian and most importantly clear them self as ancient sassanid dunasty.
Azarbaygan it self is persian word
@@papazataklaattiranimam lol I just read your source now most of these links are open source!nice trying ismeal never have single turkish poetry his main language is persian and azaric with turkish as 3 becuse. In fact seljuq sultans have persian poetry
forgot about thr fatamids?
We are qızılbash alevis. 🇹🇷🇦🇿
@ZENDEDEI SABET are you idiot azerbaycan is geography name nation is turkish.
Are Azeri Turks also alevi? I thought they were of the Jaffari branch of Shiism.
@@hanifitasova519 azeries are turkish they were alevi kizilbash. Persians had shiaciations
Your country is 103 yrs old how can you claim any history before 1918?
long life Davaleh Safaviyeh✊
This was basically Turk vs Turk.
Balkan/Anatolian Turks (Sunni) vs Iranian /Middle Eastern Turk (Shia), Alhamdulliah for Yavuz Selim Han Hz
Sylvester Stallone is also TURK
Irān-e Bozorg Ērānšahr
Columbia University Press
At much the same time, two more great states arose, each led by migrant Turkish princes: the Safavid Empire of Iran, founded in 1500, and the Mughal Empire of India and Afghanistan, founded in 1526.
books.google.com.tr/books?id=Z013mXynh1wC&pg=PA72&dq=Safavid+dynasty+columbia+university+press&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjGvrKll5XpAhUqpIsKHT85D0U4HhDoATAGegQIARAy
Cambridge University Press
books.google.com.tr/books?id=5ky2CgAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Safavid+dynasty+cambridge+university+press&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjn0PCSmJXpAhXK_CoKHc2lDlcQ6AEINDAC#v=snippet&q=Roots&f=false
Lsş
@Irān-e Bozorg Ērānšahr Yeah but Shah Ismail was
@@mettinkaytaz6106 turk culture is Persian culture with Greek influence since western Anatolia is ethnicly Greek. Just like ataturk
@Irān-e Bozorg Ērānšahr Tell that to the thousands of , Azeris, Azeri Turks, Kizilbas and other Iranians of Circassian / Georgian and even Ermeni decent today, I'm sure that they would have something to say something about that.
I suggest you do a little reading before you make you're little ASSumptions
Your data is completely wrong, Qizilbash(Red hats) was Turks who converted to Shia and Safavids are also Turks and Shah Esmayil has a Turkish poem book and his poetic nickname was Khatayi. Chaldiran was a TURK-TURK battle.
U are just presenting one side now cover shah abbas and nader shah both of them destroyed ottoman and mughal empire combine no one way talk 😏😎
Lol safavids gone ottoman dynasty still here 😂😂😂😂
Turk vs Turk
CORRECT!!!!
Today it would be viewed as Anataolian / Balkan Turk vs Azeri / Ethno Iranic Turkmen. But modern day Turkey and Azerbaijan have a "Special" relationship. In all honesty Turkey is Azerbaijan's buddy becuase Azerbaijan is the most naturally rich country in the World.
Mettin Kaytaz ethno iranic turkmen?
@@papazataklaattiranimam Yeah, I mean Turkmen who live in areas like north west & western Iran, where 20 Million+ Azeri Turks live today, by rights western Iran should be called South Azerbaijan today. Also North East Iran is home to other tribes of Kizilbash Turkmen, areas like Khorasan.
People like these are ethno Iranic Turkmen, almost Central Asian.
persian vs persian..
Safavids were persian
Ottomans were persian also
@@jason.h.zager88 Ottomans are not Persian folk, why you think that is pretty daft
persian vs persian
Nope,
To call Ottoman's Persians is really silly
@@mettinkaytaz6106 they spoke Persian.all Ottoman kings had Persian poets and persian discription
@@jason.h.zager88 So?, Osman Padishah's spoke Arabic also - does that make them of Arabic descent?, some Padishah's also spoke French, Bulgarian, Crimean etc - does that make them of those descent?, is it so bad to converse in another language?, it is a way of broadening your horizons to learn another's culture. But to deem Ottoman's Persian is really silly.
All Osman Padishah's spoke a form of Farsi / Persian language(s), it was the Islamic thing to do to keep in touch with your rivals, also for other Purposes like Literature, and yes, Poetry, but to base them Persisn off of that is Pathetic. You obviously know little about Turkish history.
Btw Persian Shah's spoke Turkic languages also, like Tatar, Uzbek, Shahsevan dialect, Azeri etc, and some spoke Pushto - did that make them ethnic Afghan? and Hindi - did that make them Indian?, No.
Btw again the Imperial Russian Romanovs spoke more French than Russian - did that make them French?, Empress Victoria of Great Britain spoke more German than she did English - did that make her German?, the Hapsburgs of Austria spoke more Spanish - did that make them Spanish?. I speak English - does that make me English?, I am Turkish.
Oh, there is no such thing as Ottoman King - its Sultan, or Osman Padishah. To call Ottoman's Persian is like calling the Dutch folk from Holland German - Stupid.
@@mettinkaytaz6106 He is making fun of people that say that the Safavids were Turkic. All the Turkic things the Safavids did, the Ottomans did also.
@@nice5396Maybe Maybe Forest Gump is the wisest of us all - "Stupid is as Stupid Does"
You casually left the part where persian sunnis were forcefully converted to shiaism as well as forcefully expulsion of sunni scholars and persecution of many.
I made a video on How Iran Became Shia, check it out
TURKS VS TURKS
Basically yeah
Iran vs Anatolia
Safavid vs Ottoman
🇹🇷 vs 🇦🇿
@@azerill1173 SAFAVİD İS AZERBAİJAN EMPİRE 🤘🏻🇦🇿
@@HK-qc6tj
This is not a game، bro😅
The Safavid kings called themselves the Shah of Iran and for many cultural, social, political and ... reasons.
Be a little in the real world, and do not be under the illusion.
@daniel mezrati
If ottoman was real man he would not hide behind canon & guns ..
This shows how much he fear from Ismail shah Safavi r.a the great...
Ottoman gays won physical but real man hero is Ismail shah Safavi
And Shah ABBAS won because Ottomans Fighting Austria An rebbelion also Ottomans were betrayed by some commanders
@@littlehistorian5751
This is Allah power , how 2 lakh harami lost from 20,000 soldiers 😂😂😂😂
Neither ottoman harami able to defeat European not able able to win against safavi Islam soldiers...
@@GaziFerozLulu110 Ottomans are not harami The harami are the sfafvids
@@littlehistorian5751 ottoman harami lost soldiers ran from battel field , later he self executed own soldiers for absconding him between battel 🤣🤣😂
@@GaziFerozLulu110 Russia defeated safavids
Enemies in past and friends now🇮🇷❤🇹🇷
Safavid not persian Safavid Was TURKS EMPIRE
@@sound9864 We are not Azeri !!! WE ARE TURKS AND SAFAVIS WAS TURKS ORIGINS Turkmen tribes supporting the establishment of Safavid State are: Şadilli, Şamlı, Afşar, Kaçar, Çağırganlı, Karamustafaoğlu, Tekeli, Beğdili, Humuslu, Ustaclu, Dulkadirlu, Varsaklar.
The Safavids State 1501 - 1736 is a Turkish province with the Southern Azerbaijan Center.
Qizilbash is based on Nakhchivan, which bases the chief of Gulustan. This hadith is described in Tarix-i Shah Ismail asirr: This is cursed: [Ismail] the columns of the poet - Huseyn bey Lalani, Muhammad bey Ustacl, Abdi bey Shamli, Xadim bey Khulafani, Q Reviews Do you want the waterfall of Gulus ?
Do you want the Azerbaijani throne or the Gulustan fortress? "They answered: 'Azerbaijan!'
Khatai also became a speaker and became the Piri of Turkestan (Azerbaijan)
Sah ismail calls himself Turkistan (Azerbaijan) piri (Source V.Minorsky The Poetry of Sah ismail. CTP 1006a)
Safavid dynasty started with the capture of Tabriz. In 1501, Ismail I declared Tabriz the capital, the Shah of Azerbaijan, and continued to spread from here to Iran. During the first decade following the establishment, İsmail, who tried to protect his state from the Ottoman attacks, crushed the ruins of Akkoyunlu on the other. continued to spread in its territory. Hemedan in 1503, Shiraz and Kirman in 1504, the holy places of Najaf and Karbala in Shia in 1507, Van in 1508, Baghdad in 1509, and the founder of the Uzbek Şeybani Khanate in 1510, Muhammet Şeybani Han. As a result, he captured the cities of Horasan and Herat (the center of Sistan). In 1511, the Uzbeks withdrew to Maveraünnehir following this defeat and continued their long-lasting attacks against the Safavids.
İsmail Safevi declared himself Shah in Tabriz in July 1501 after defeating the Akkoyunlu Emiri Elvend Mirza, who is the grandson of Uzun Hasan, the ruler of Akkoyunlu, near Sharur (Nakhichevan). When Tahmasb I included all Azerbaijan in the empire, the Azerbaijani Turks constituted the main core of the Safavid army, Sah Ismail now declared himself Sah in Southern Azerbaijan.
After this, he took over the whole of Iran and laid the foundation of a Shia state, which was officially the Safavid Shah in May 1502, in the next 250 years, which will have a great impact on the Middle East.
The Army of the Safavids state consisted of Turks Qizilbash Turks. Safavids became Turkish in army language
The State was also called the Qizilbash State for the Turks in the Safavid Army.
Safavids saw themselves as followers of the Akkoyunlu Azerbaijan Turk state
Wilhelm Barthold believes that Safavids are of Turkish origin rather than Persian, Russian historian Petrushevski has a similar view; "The first Safavid sheikhs lived in Ardebil and their mother tongue was Azerbaijani (ie Turkish)".
Regarding İsmail Hakkı Uzunçarşılı's object of Safavids; "They showed themselves from Salat-i Huseyniyya according to the silence they published as a tool for the politics of this family, who is a pure Turkish state," he writes. Similar information on this subject, based on the data in Saffetü's-Safa, Safiyüddin Erdebilî was called “the piri of the Turk”, the sheikh was living in the “Turkish village” and he served even better to the Turkish disciples who came to the guests and offered them white bread and honey. It is seen that Safi's many contemporaries, who were originally Persian in 1272, also called him, "Turkish Piri."
The origin of the Safavid Dynasty comes from the Safavid sect, which was established in Ardebil by Safiyüddin İshak, who was the sixth degree grandfather of Shah Ismail, at the end of the 13th century. He became the head of his sect and after the death of Zahid, the sect was known as Safevîy. During the period of Sheikh Cüneyt's sect, the Akkoyuns were under the protection of the Safavids and turned the Turks into a Shiite. These Shiite Turkmens were named as historical Kizilbash because they usually wear a red turban on their heads.
Safavid state is an Azerbaijan state
Sah ismail, And the rulers who came after him saw themselves as the followers of Aqoyunlu, a Turkmen State.
Kızılbaşlar normally spoke Azerbaijani dialect of Turkish. Safavid Shahs spoke Azerbaijani dialect just like them. The fact that the people and the state and government leaders did not speak like the Persian mother tongue caused the Persian dynasty to be separated from the old classical pure classical standards. The language used by all high religious hierarchy members was Turkish, not Persian. "
"Azeri dialect of Turkish was used mostly in the Safavid Palace, especially during the periods of the first Safavid rulers, including the dynasty. Turkish grammar rules and words had a great influence on the Persian language during this period, and otherwise, it is possible to say that the grammar and words of Persian affect Turkish."
I bequeath to you three things inherited from our wise ancestors: Mother Language Our Conscience Our Motherland
(Shah ismail khatai)
Until 1925, Iran was ruled by the states and dynasties of the Great Seljuk, Safavid, Kaçar, Afşar, Kızılbaş, Türkmen and Azerbaijan Turks.
Great Seljuk State, Akkoyunlu State, Karakoyunlu State and then Safavid State, Afşar Dynasty and Kaçar Dynasty are states of Turkish origin.
Safavid was Turks
books.google.az/books?id=1uCaELAsv3MC&pg=PA86&dq=Safavid+Turks&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZjYefvsznAhUPxqYKHQTCCvwQ6AEILDAB#v=onepage&q=Safavid%20Turks&f=false
Safavid was Turks origins
According Ohico State Universty
ruclips.net/video/ekhwuGykzi4/видео.html
Safavid was Azerbaijan Turks origins
sonsofsunnah.com/2011/04/15/two-turkish-empires-the-ottoman-sunni-turks-vs-safavid-shia-turks/amp/
Safavid Azerbaijan Empire
www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iran/history-safavid.htm
*references*
Christoph Marcinkowski (tr.),Persian Historiography and Geography: Bertold Spuler on Major Works Produced in Iran, the Caucasus, Central Asia, India and Early Ottoman Turkey, Singapore: Pustaka Nasional, 2003, ISBN 9971-77-488-7.
Christoph Marcinkowski (tr., ed.),Mirza Rafi‘a's Dastur al-Muluk: A Manual of Later Safavid Administration. Annotated English Translation, Comments on the Offices and Services, and Facsimile of the Unique Persian Manuscript, Kuala Lumpur, ISTAC, 2002, ISBN 983-9379-26-7.
Christoph Marcinkowski,From Isfahan to Ayutthaya: Contacts between Iran and Siam in the 17th Century, Singapore, Pustaka Nasional, 2005, ISBN 9971-77-491-7.
"The Voyages and Travels of the Ambassadors", Adam Olearius, translated by John Davies (1662).
Jackson, Peter; Lockhart, Laurence, eds. (1986). The Timurid and Safavid Periods The Cambridge History of Iran. 6. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521200943.
Khanbaghi, Aptin (2006). The Fire, the Star and the Cross: Minority Religions in Medieval and Early Modern Iran. I.B. Tauris. ISBN 978-1845110567.
Kremer, William (25 January 2013). "Why Did Men Stop Wearing High Heels?" BBC News Magazine. Archived from the original on 13 September 2014. Retrieved 13 September 2014.
Mikaberidze, Alexander (2015). Historical Dictionary of Georgia (2 ed.). Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1442241466.
Savory, Roger (2007). Iran under the Safavids. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521042512.
Sicker, Martin (2001). The Islamic World in Decline: From the Treaty of Karlowitz to the Disintegration of the Ottoman Empire. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0275968915.
Yarshater, Ehsan (2001). Encyclopedia Iranica. Routledge & Kegan Paul. ISBN 0933273568.
İsgəndər bəy Münşi Türkman. "Dünyanı bəzəyən Abbasın tarixi" ("Tarixe aləmaraye Abbasi"). Bakı. "Şərq-Qərb". 2010. ISBN 978-9952-34-620-6 (yüklə)
Şahin Fərzəliyev. "Azərbaycan XV-XVI əsrlərdə". Bakı. "Elm". 1983. 108 səh. (yüklə)
"Qızılbaşlar tarixi". Tərcümə və şərhlər: M. Ə. Məhəmmədi. Bakı, «Azərbaycan» nəşriyyatı. 1993. 48 səh. (yüklə)
Azərbaycan Tarixi. I cild. (ən qədim zamanlardan XX əsrədək). Bakı. "Azərnəşr". 1994. 680 səh.
Rəhimə Dadaşova. Səfəvilərin son dövrü (ingilisdilli tarixşünaslıqda). B
Xacə Zeynalabidin Əli Əbdi bəy. Təkmilətül-əxbar (Səfəvi dövrü - şah İsmayıl və şah Təhmasib dövrlərinin tarixi). - Bakı: Elm, 1996-200s. ISBN 5-8066-0436-5
Əfəndiyev, Oqtay (2007), Azərbaycan Səfəvilər dövləti (PDF), Kamil Muxtarov, Şərq-Qərb, ISBN 978-9952-34-101-0
@UCwKcG6POCqyMYgPEU6LfJ9w Safavid is not persian empire 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Safavid was Azerbaijan turks dynasty
History of Azerbaijan Safavid Turks😍
@@historyofazerbaijan4652 Safavids were not Turk they were Kurdish iranian with official language of Persian and persian army...
ottomans were also not turk they has Roman persian blood
@@jason.h.zager88 Turkmen tribes supporting the establishment of Safavid State are: Şadilli, Şamlı, Afşar, Kaçar, Çağırganlı, Karamustafaoğlu, Tekeli, Beğdili, Humuslu, Ustaclu, Dulkadirlu, Varsaklar.
The Safavids State 1501 - 1736 is a Turkish province with the Southern Azerbaijan Center.
Qizilbash is based on Nakhchivan, which bases the chief of Gulustan. This hadith is described in Tarix-i Shah Ismail asirr: This is cursed: [Ismail] the columns of the poet - Huseyn bey Lalani, Muhammad bey Ustacl, Abdi bey Shamli, Xadim bey Khulafani, Q Reviews Do you want the waterfall of Gulus ?
Do you want the Azerbaijani throne or the Gulustan fortress? "They answered: 'Azerbaijan!'
In Iranian studies, the idea that the Safavids were a manifestation of a return to "national Iranian power" after eight centuries of foreign rule has been refuted. This notion, backed up in the prism of 20th-century Iranian nationalism, is untrue.
D. B. Wood, "The" Shahnama-i ismail: art and cultural memory in the sixteenth-century "iran p.
Khatai also became a speaker and became the Piri of Turkestan (Azerbaijan)
Sah ismail calls himself Turkistan (Azerbaijan) piri (Source V.Minorsky The Poetry of Sah ismail. CTP 1006a)
Russian historian Alexei Shishov writes in "100 Great Commanders of the Middle Ages": The palace language and state language was Tatar (Azerbaijani) Turkish during the reign of Shah Ismail, the ruler of the Safavid state, which was formed as a result of the migration of ancient Turkic nomadic tribes. The boundaries of Persian were very limited, and it remained mainly the language of literature and the language used in the palace office.
Like the real Turkic dynasty, the Safavids (unlike the Ottomans) were a nomadic dynasty: "We know that the Safavids themselves were a dynasty very closely related to the Alachik culture; although the Safavid capital was located in Tabriz, Qazvin and Isfahan, spent part of the empire wandering around and living in a shack "
C. P. Mitchell, "The Showrd and the pen: Diplomacy in early Safavid iran, 1501- 1555", p. 289
Safavid dynasty started with the capture of Tabriz. In 1501, Ismail I declared Tabriz the capital, the Shah of Azerbaijan, and continued to spread from here to Iran. During the first decade following the establishment, İsmail, who tried to protect his state from the Ottoman attacks, crushed the ruins of Akkoyunlu on the other. continued to spread in its territory. Hemedan in 1503, Shiraz and Kirman in 1504, the holy places of Najaf and Karbala in Shia in 1507, Van in 1508, Baghdad in 1509, and the founder of the Uzbek Şeybani Khanate in 1510, Muhammet Şeybani Han. As a result, he captured the cities of Horasan and Herat (the center of Sistan). In 1511, the Uzbeks withdrew to Maveraünnehir following this defeat and continued their long-lasting attacks against the Safavids.
İsmail Safevi declared himself Shah in Tabriz in July 1501 after defeating the Akkoyunlu Emiri Elvend Mirza, who is the grandson of Uzun Hasan, the ruler of Akkoyunlu, near Sharur (Nakhichevan). When Tahmasb I included all Azerbaijan in the empire, the Azerbaijani Turks constituted the main core of the Safavid army, Sah Ismail now declared himself Sah in Southern Azerbaijan.
After this, he took over the whole of Iran and laid the foundation of a Shia state, which was officially the Safavid Shah in May 1502, in the next 250 years, which will have a great impact on the Middle East.
The Army of the Safavids state consisted of Turks Qizilbash Turks. Safavids became Turkish in army language
The State was also called the Qizilbash State for the Turks in the Safavid Army.
Safavids saw themselves as followers of the Akkoyunlu Azerbaijan Turk state
Wilhelm Barthold believes that Safavids are of Turkish origin rather than Persian, Russian historian Petrushevski has a similar view; "The first Safavid sheikhs lived in Ardebil and their mother tongue was Azerbaijani (ie Turkish)".
Regarding İsmail Hakkı Uzunçarşılı's object of Safavids; "They showed themselves from Salat-i Huseyniyya according to the silence they published as a tool for the politics of this family, who is a pure Turkish state," he writes. Similar information on this subject, based on the data in Saffetü's-Safa, Safiyüddin Erdebilî was called “the piri of the Turk”, the sheikh was living in the “Turkish village” and he served even better to the Turkish disciples who came to the guests and offered them white bread and honey. It is seen that Safi's many contemporaries, who were originally Persian in 1272, also called him, "Turkish Piri."
The origin of the Safavid Dynasty comes from the Safavid sect, which was established in Ardebil by Safiyüddin İshak, who was the sixth degree grandfather of Shah Ismail, at the end of the 13th century. He became the head of his sect and after the death of Zahid, the sect was known as Safevîy. During the period of Sheikh Cüneyt's sect, the Akkoyuns were under the protection of the Safavids and turned the Turks into a Shiite. These Shiite Turkmens were named as historical Kizilbash because they usually wear a red turban on their heads.
Safavid state is an Azerbaijan state
Sah ismail, And the rulers who came after him saw themselves as the followers of Aqoyunlu, a Turkmen State.
Kızılbaşlar normally spoke Azerbaijani dialect of Turkish. Safavid Shahs spoke Azerbaijani dialect just like them. The fact that the people and the state and government leaders did not speak like the Persian mother tongue caused the Persian dynasty to be separated from the old classical pure classical standards. The language used by all high religious hierarchy members was Turkish, not Persian. "
"Azeri dialect of Turkish was used mostly in the Safavid Palace, especially during the periods of the first Safavid rulers, including the dynasty. Turkish grammar rules and words had a great influence on the Persian language during this period, and otherwise, it is possible to say that the grammar and words of Persian affect Turkish."
I bequeath to you three things inherited from our wise ancestors: Mother Language Our Conscience Our Motherland
(Shah ismail khatai)
There are various and unscientific opinions about the ethnicity of the Safavids. It is claimed that they are of Kurdish (Zaki Validi Togan, A. Kasravi, S. Rahimzade, N. Sheybani), Iranian (M. Mushkur) origin, and thus it is emphasized that the Safavid state was supposedly an Iranian state from the very beginning. Acad. VV Bartold, IP Petrushevsky, OA Afandiyev and others. Researchers have repeatedly stated that such considerations have no scientific basis. VV Bartold writes that the Safavids "are the sheikhs of Ardabil, of course, not of Persian, but of Turkish origin." IP Petrushevsky shows that the native language of the first Safavids was Azerbaijani. The information of the first sources ("Saffat as-safa") also confirms this. The Safavids were based on the Qizilbash tribes. They include shamlu, rumlu, ustaglu, tekeli, zulqadar and others. tribes occupied a central place. The activities of the Safavids also included Afshar, Qajar, Varsaq, Bayat, Karamanli, Barahli, Alpaut, Arashli, Kazakh and others. Turkic-speaking tribes were also closely involved. At the same time, Iranian-speaking and Albanian tribes occupied a certain place in the population of the country. Azerbaijan remained a country uniting many tribes.
The activity of the Safavids served to develop and strengthen the traditions of statehood in Azerbaijan. Taking advantage of the experience of their predecessors, the Safavids were able to continue the statehood of Azerbaijan for two more centuries. The use of local traditions was preferred in public administration.
Until 1925, Iran was ruled by the states and dynasties of the Great Seljuk, Safavid, Kaçar, Afşar, Kızılbaş, Türkmen and Azerbaijan Turks.
Great Seljuk State, Akkoyunlu State, Karakoyunlu State and then Safavid State, Afşar Dynasty and Kaçar Dynasty are states of Turkish origin.
Safavid was Turks
books.google.az/books?id=1uCaELAsv3MC&pg=PA86&dq=Safavid+Turks&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZjYefvsznAhUPxqYKHQTCCvwQ6AEILDAB#v=onepage&q=Safavid%20Turks&f=false
Safavid was Turks origins
According Ohico State Universty
ruclips.net/video/ekhwuGykzi4/видео.html
Safavid was Azerbaijan Turks origins
sonsofsunnah.com/2011/04/15/two-turkish-empires-the-ottoman-sunni-turks-vs-safavid-shia-turks/amp/
Safavid Azerbaijan Empire
www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iran/history-safavid.htm
*references*
Christoph Marcinkowski (tr.),Persian Historiography and Geography: Bertold Spuler on Major Works Produced in Iran, the Caucasus, Central Asia, India and Early Ottoman Turkey, Singapore: Pustaka Nasional, 2003, ISBN 9971-77-488-7.
Christoph Marcinkowski (tr., ed.),Mirza Rafi‘a's Dastur al-Muluk: A Manual of Later Safavid Administration. Annotated English Translation, Comments on the Offices and Services, and Facsimile of the Unique Persian Manuscript, Kuala Lumpur, ISTAC, 2002, ISBN 983-9379-26-7.
Christoph Marcinkowski,From Isfahan to Ayutthaya: Contacts between Iran and Siam in the 17th Century, Singapore, Pustaka Nasional, 2005, ISBN 9971-77-491-7.
Turks vs Turks 🇹🇷 vs 🇦🇿
Safavids were from🇮🇷(iran) not from🇦🇿(fake azerbaijan)
Keep dream boy whole world know history safavid are azaric iranian azarbaygan it self is persian word.
Fake Azerbaijan
😂😂😂
Turk vs Turk
Shia Vs Sunni...
Kayi Turk vs Azeri Turk+Persian+Kurdi+Arabian Iraq+Turkmen
Kurds Vs Turks
Lol