man I love your analysis, such an amazing person your and your explanation ...are like so easy to digest even a 5yr old can get it. Keep it up!!! great content
We are just beginning to test it. If all goes well very soon when all testing is done. There are still a few minor bugs. But most importantly there are many functional enhancements beyond form. Thanks for asking.
No, 50% above and 50% below the average is not necessary. That would be a measure called "median", whereas the average being discussed is "the arithmetic mean". For example, the average score on a test is 78% and 4 of 5 people are above average. The scores are 95, 95, 95, 95, 10. (That's probably the professors' IQ test results.) To figure the arithmetic mean, or average, add them up and divide by the number of scores. The "median" score is 95, because that is the score with 2 above and 2 below in the set of 5. The "mode" is 95, as it is the most common score. I cannot do the standard deviation in my head. I know my limits. There are many types of averages, but the most well known and typical is the arithmetic mean. Others include a geometric mean, the root mean square, ... You should know statistics before you criticize statistics.
Who cares. The point is something completely else. That 94% of people think they are smarter than others and know something better than others. That lead to overconfidence a overestimating of your skills in the stock market. So its better to think you can be wrong and make different estimates in a range.
And thats why you almost never can change a mind of someone trying to convince them that overpaying is not good. You can have thousand argument and proofs but most people will completely ignore it because they think they know better than you.
I dont like the new look. Nothing was wrong with the current look. At least put share price and dividend yield where it was in fast facts. So all data is together. Why share price should be somewhere else than PE etc. But otherwise thank you for your great tool.
Ales Thanks for the feedback. However, we are still working on the new version and the price is not fully functioning yet. To be perfectly honest, I accidentally included this new version without realizing it. If you look closely, you’ll notice that the dividend yield function isn’t even working . But most importantly, the new version of FAST Graphs is about lot more than a slightly different look. It is a completely different software platform, and it will include several advantages and upgrades that the old version was incapable of providing. We are very excited about it and hope to launch it soon once we are confident the platform is stable and fully functioning.
Thank you for reply and cant wait to try new functions. I like the new version overall it just seems too wide now and will not fit to smaller screens. I prefered fast facts and company info the way it was. More compact and fitting in one screenshot.
Very insightful and excellent reminders. Thank you both.
Thanks Chuck. Great content as usual.
Again on point Chuck! Thanks for the videos
Thx chuck.
man I love your analysis, such an amazing person your and your explanation ...are like so easy to digest even a 5yr old can get it. Keep it up!!! great content
I am an average investor, but I'm above average at identifying and listening to above average investors.
Is that a new version of FG there at the end? Looks different
😉
The new website design looks much cleaner, when will it be released?
We are just beginning to test it. If all goes well very soon when all testing is done. There are still a few minor bugs. But most importantly there are many functional enhancements beyond form. Thanks for asking.
@@FASTgraphs thanks for the reply. Is there a mobile version as well?
ALB, the bellweather for froth in renewables industry stocks.
The vertical Albemarle line is the “Robinhood” line.
Above average right here...... lmao
No, 50% above and 50% below the average is not necessary. That would be a measure called "median", whereas the average being discussed is "the arithmetic mean".
For example, the average score on a test is 78% and 4 of 5 people are above average. The scores are 95, 95, 95, 95, 10. (That's probably the professors' IQ test results.) To figure the arithmetic mean, or average, add them up and divide by the number of scores. The "median" score is 95, because that is the score with 2 above and 2 below in the set of 5. The "mode" is 95, as it is the most common score. I cannot do the standard deviation in my head. I know my limits. There are many types of averages, but the most well known and typical is the arithmetic mean. Others include a geometric mean, the root mean square, ...
You should know statistics before you criticize statistics.
You are above average for statistics in this room
Who cares. The point is something completely else. That 94% of people think they are smarter than others and know something better than others. That lead to overconfidence a overestimating of your skills in the stock market. So its better to think you can be wrong and make different estimates in a range.
And thats why you almost never can change a mind of someone trying to convince them that overpaying is not good. You can have thousand argument and proofs but most people will completely ignore it because they think they know better than you.
@@Cap_management lol mate, are you talking about my wife?
I dont know her. But try to ask her if she is above average driver :-)
I dont like the new look. Nothing was wrong with the current look. At least put share price and dividend yield where it was in fast facts. So all data is together. Why share price should be somewhere else than PE etc. But otherwise thank you for your great tool.
Ales Thanks for the feedback. However, we are still working on the new version and the price is not fully functioning yet. To be perfectly honest, I accidentally included this new version without realizing it. If you look closely, you’ll notice that the dividend yield function isn’t even working .
But most importantly, the new version of FAST Graphs is about lot more than a slightly different look. It is a completely different software platform, and it will include several advantages and upgrades that the old version was incapable of providing. We are very excited about it and hope to launch it soon once we are confident the platform is stable and fully functioning.
Thank you for reply and cant wait to try new functions. I like the new version overall it just seems too wide now and will not fit to smaller screens. I prefered fast facts and company info the way it was. More compact and fitting in one screenshot.