Sir, the ending done by your kid is excellent and perfect.. and also what you said, that it's better to cut rather to stitch the relation is also a highlight.. Thank you sir for valuable thought and also for the video
Sir Thank you for this excellent deliberations...I am regularly following your videos sir.. It helps me in enhancing my points sir... thank you so much sir and if possible please do more videos on this subject and as well on Company law too
Case law: - Seaford court estates vs Asher (1949) Not to do interpretation in clear & unambiguous language - R.S Nayak vs A.R.Antulya (1984) - M/S Grasim Industries Limited vs Collector of custos (2002) - Crawford vs Spooner (1846)
Sir, the ending done by your kid is excellent and perfect.. and also what you said, that it's better to cut rather to stitch the relation is also a highlight.. Thank you sir for valuable thought and also for the video
ending laugh got me 😂by your son ! your are genius in giving examples
Sir Thank you for this excellent deliberations...I am regularly following your videos sir.. It helps me in enhancing my points sir... thank you so much sir and if possible please do more videos on this subject and as well on Company law too
Sir, your lecture is advantageous.
nice explanation
Thank you sir...for such a wonderful lecture
Excellent Teaching Tnq sir
Thanks sir fantabulous lecture
Very much thank you sir....
Sir, please do lecture on law of Tort also and Right to Information.
Thank you so much sir
Nice sir
Plz upload cpc Notes
fuzzy fonts..please make it clear..
Some time it happens due to weak network
Case law:
- Seaford court estates vs Asher (1949)
Not to do interpretation in clear & unambiguous language
- R.S Nayak vs A.R.Antulya (1984)
- M/S Grasim Industries Limited vs Collector of custos (2002)
- Crawford vs Spooner (1846)
Your speaking process very bad