Since jupiter and the sun actually rotate around a center point of gravity instead of Jupiter orbiting the sun, and seeing the composition being so close to each other, could our solar system be a failed binary star system?
No, because this video is very misleading. Jupiter is 13 times too light to be a rown dwarf, it's less of a failed sar and more of a gas giant- a large planet with a similar composition to a star. Saying Jupiter is star-like is comparable to saying a pebble is boulder-like.
50% of the stars in the solar systems are duel complex systems so they have 2 stars orbiting each other and planets go around 2 stars. I think Jupiter was supposed to be the 2nd star but there wasn't enough mass to create a 2nd star.
Jupiter is probably a failed red dwarf star considering red dwarfs are the most abundant stars in the universe. Also more than 50% of all star systems have multiple stars orbiting each other. Maybe if the cloud that became Jupiter was a little warmer we would be living in a double star system. But then maybe we wouldn't be here without big brother Jupiter protecting us from collisions by space debris. Let's just be happy Jupiter failed to get its engine going.
OK, I'm not entirely fine with your answer. First, the word planet has clearly been defined by the International Astronomical Union in 2006: A planet must: - be massive enough to be spherical, but not massive enough to undergo nuclear reactions (otherwise it's a star) - be orbiting around its star - have cleared its orbit from any major object (otherwise it's a dwarf planet like Pluto) Now a Brown dwarf is a little bit more problematic to define, however, it's aggreed that a brown dwarf must be massive enough to allow the combustion of deuterium, but not enough to undergo the fusion of hydrogen into helium. Thus a brown dwarf must be at least 13 times more massive than Jupiter. In consequence, Jupiter is far from being a brown dwarf. What might confuse you is the similarity of the size of Jupiter and of brown dwarf, however, if we were to increase the mass of Jupiter (in order to allow the planet to burn deuterium like a brown dwarf), it is believed that Jupiter would shrink, because of the stronger gravitational effects.
Of course, the orbits cannot be 100% clean, for exemple, we know that the inner solar system is a bit dusty: there is a kind of ring of particules that spreads from Mercury to well beyond Earth (this is called the zodiac cloud). You forgot the word "major", for exemple, you can't find any object with a diameter of let's say 500km. Also, commets, asteroids and meteor aren't on the same orbit that the Earth, they just cross it. What I meant is that you can't find them orbiting near the Earth.
Rouge planet? I assume you mean rogue planet don't you? Well this kind of planet is a planet that has been ejected of its orbit by another massive body. What I'm going to say is just an assumption, but I think that we keep calling them planets because it's just more convenient to say, given that they would be planets if they hadn't been ejected in the first place, in this case we add the word "rogue" only to specify that they have actually been ejected, but that they would be planets if it hadn't happen.
I think 13 Jupiter masses should be about the limit of a brown dwarf, because I believe that's where you get deuterium fusion which would allow the brown dwarf to emit energy of its own enough to even be visible from up close, but I do agree that the line is kind of fuzzy given composition and atmospheric dynamics, because Jupiter almost certainly would look like a low mass brown dwarf.
Great video man I can see in a year you will get to 100k Subs at this rate. If you want to grow faster do videos on Space News like what are Future missions to space, how to colonize moons and Planets how much that would cost and your educated guess on when it will happen try it out for a month and you will see growth with my ideas. I had subscribed to you
Thank you for posting this video and explaining the differences between a star and a planet, especially when it comes to both of them having a similar mass. As you probably know, the Juno spacecraft has answered some of the questions about the formation of Jupiter.
Yes mark tuson and suphi sarigollu, that's where they lost me. There is no such thing a nucular medicine scan, a nucular power plant, nucular fusion, or nucular energy. That drives me absolutely fucking crazy. IT'S NUCLEAR! GAWD!
What would be cool to me would be to witness the moment of solar ignition in a star. I don't think we've ever observed that moment when a star begins the fusion process.
To be a brown dwarf, a failed star where the gravity collapsed faster then it heated up..creating abnormal matter, making fusion impossible. But still brown dwarfs are like 10 20 times jupiters mass, gas giants and brown dwarfs are one thing on the same way, only the moment it stopped is different, making all of these things the most common in the universe, since most are 3. or 4. generation objects
Failed star? maybe it just hasn't got there yet, maybe it's a star in the making. Considering how short a time frame these astronomy experts have had to study these topics, for them to say with any certainty that they know exactly what's going on, I find (fascinating) hard to believe. Maybe our solar system hasn't gotten to the two star system just yet?
Veeresh well no, sure the temperature will rise but you need a few million degrees to start fusing atoms together, this can’t be obtained with Jupiter’s rather small mass compared to suns, it would take 72 Jupiter’s just to create a brown dwarf. To answer your question, in order for nuclear fusion to occur, the object has to have, gas and lots of it, needs to be at the very least of 72 Jupiter’s, and needs it’s core temperature constantly changing but balanced in the million-two million degrees Celsius range.
KidsLive a brown dwarf fuses deuterium which is a different form of hydrogen so if it doesn't fuse deuterium then it not a brown dwarf plus human give off infrared
Jupiter would require at least a 75 fold increase in mass to become a star. It's already 1000 times less massive than the sun and hence it would be sweet very small star at that. In addition I think you have confused the terms diameter and mass for brown dwarves. Brown dwarves have a similar diameter to jupiter but are tens of times more massive. That said I suppose it depends in the definition of brown dwarves because they radiate heat through compression, as does jupiter, which radiates more heat than it receives from the sun so maybe...
Just because you were told something and believed it, doesn't mean it was true. Do you still belive in Santa Claus or the Tooth Fairy just because your parents told you they exist?
I'd say so far that a planet is: an object which is or was large enough to clear it's obit with it's parent star and has enough mass to form into a sphere. A planet is also incapable of fusion and can have been ejected from it's parent star.
You can google this > “ALL THESE WORLDS ARE YOURS - EXCEPT EUROPA. ATTEMPT NO LANDINGS THERE.” Loved this movie big time, this was quoted from. After Jupiter was made very dense by the monolith, the planet ignited into a star.
Speaking of hydrogen, how does the amount of hydrogen comprised in Jupiter compare to the amount of hydrogen in Earth's oceans? I know the Earth is tiny compared to Jupiter itself, hence my curiosity.
Hey, yeah I've heard their changing the algorhythms a little, to focus more on daily uploads and 'trending' videos. But I'll keep uploading regardless, I also operate on other platforms, so my views and subs can still increase. Even if RUclips doesn't care about my content, I'll carry on! ;-) p.s. Thanks fot the support!!! :-D
Lyric Birb “And the heaven We created with might, and indeed We are (its) expander.” (Quran 51:47) ah yes the universe is not done. For it befits Allah that he is constantly creating.
Orange Broom yes, some religions now still believe that sacrificing their people will do so. So your point Islam is not of these false or twisted from the original versions those peoples prophets brought them. We do believe praying for rain sort of. But whats wrong with that. Their are two things that must be done for something in Islam for most things: pray and action. That is what separates from wishful thinking.
All the planets had the same composition as the sun when they formed. The lighter ones didn't have enough gravity to hold on to the hydrogen and helium, which were stripped away by the solar wind. There is no difference between a large planet and a failed star.
Hey nice video! On a different subject. I heard that between Earth and our moon you can fit all the planets in our solar system (Theoretically of curse). Is that true?
Yes this is true, from just a measurement point of view! With all the planets lined next to one another, they would have 4,990 miles (8,030km) to spare, using the average Earth-moon distance of 238,555 miles! :-)
Well, according the the movie "2010: Space odessey 2", millions of monoliths surround Jupiter and condense its mass enough for it to go nuclear. (Its still a great movie from the 80's, if you get the chance to see it - shame they never made movies of the 2 remaining space odessey books in the series)
U will need 75 Jupiter's to make a brown dwarf and brown dwarf don't have the same composition as a star. The difference is that stars contain hydrogen and brown dwarfs contain hydrogen however it has a lot of lithium. Brown dwarf appear to be green whereas stars can appear from red to blue spectrum
I often asked myself that question, because many systems are binary star systems, we are lucky that we are not, but jupiter could have been a second star
There are 2 out come... 1. There would be a habital zone and would possible have life on one of its moons 2. It would give off more heat and earth wouldnt be habital
If a planet is defined as a celestial object in orbit around a star and has cleared its neighborhood, then Jupiter is a planet and not a star like object. If, on the other hand, Jupiter was wandering through the cosmos on its own, but was carrying with it other celestial objects that were orbiting it, I would consider it to be a star like object. Of course, I'm not an astronomer - not even an amateur astronomer - so, I'm merely expressing my lay person's opinion.
I believe Jupiter was a forming star but a slightly smaller planet crash in to it and mixing there atmosphere together, distroying its chance for fusion but creating the red spot.
Joel VELEZ Crashed* Destroyed* Their* Plus a planet sized object colliding into something like Jupiter can't create a storm. That's all the Great Red Spot is. It's a storm that has been around 300 years and grew in size by consuming other storms on its gaseous surface.
Makes me wonder what it would take to ignite Jupiter, and what would be the effect here on earth once it was lit. But I guess that unless somebody has a good interplanetary spaceship they aren't using... and a really big match... we won't be able to get any answers to this one any time soon.
Orange Broom all the planets make the sun wobble to a certain degree, it's just that none are quite as massive as Jupiter. The same way the moon makes our oceans wobble.
RedViking I think it's because of Jupiter's mass, which is relatively smaller compared to the sun, that it is bound by the sun's gravity. Jupiter qualifies to be called a failed star because of its composition (H, He and no heavy elements). I'm certainly not an expert, but that's just my humble opinion on the question in your comment. What surprised me more in this video is the fact that the Sun and Jupiter still have almost identical composition. I understand they formed from the same material, but the sun has been fusing H to He for billions of years, and Jupiter hasn't been. So how are they identical? I'm sure I'm missing something here..but would like to hear what the more knowledgeable folks here have to say.
Sorry I must have missed your comment. Jupiter seems to have the same composition as a star (mainly hydrogen and helium), but the internal pressure in the planet can’t produce nuclear fusion, mainly because of it’s density, volume and mass. This video basically explains that given more material from it’s formation, Jupiter could have started nuclear processes and ignited into a star. Also not forgetting, the most common system of stars in the galaxy are binary star systems. These systems can evolve into one star orbiting the other, like Jupiter orbiting the Sun. Thanks for the question! :-)
Astronomic Thank you for the reply. Was not expecting it. :) I agree with what you just explained in your reply, and also in your video. My question is on their composition. Sun: Fusing H to He for billions of years, Jupiter: Not doing that (which means H% should be more), but still has same composition as the Sun. If the Sun and Jupiter were formed out of the same material, shouldn't they have different composition by now? Hope my question is less confusing this time! :)
Stars do orbit other stars, they are called binary star systems, there are also trinary stars, that's 3 stars orbiting each other, and multiple star systems with several or more stars orbiting each other
@ RedViking : You assume that it is a failed star, because you were not there to observe Jupiter when it was in its brown dwarf glowing mode! However, the Ancients knew better and they tell us about it with other words than the modern day vocabulary.
A brown dwarf is /not/ similar in mass to Jupiter, the minimum mass to qualify as a brown dwarf would be 13 times the mass of Jupiter, and on up to just below the lowest-mass stars at 75 to 80 times the mass of Jupiter.
Yep. It was the sun before our previous sun. Saturn prior to that. So you can guess Uranus, Neptune and Pluto preceded as well. Look at the sun one day it will look like Pluto. That is the beauty of our universe.
I just thought that if Jupiter was a “star” wouldn’t it’s moons be classed as planets or just still moons? If that’s the case we would have a solar system inside a solar system. I’m a bit confused...
Apparently scientists tried to nuke Jupiter to make a second star, or had plans to nuke it so that we could live on one of it's moons. How is Jupiter gonna be a star, if it isn't heavy enough to hold those burned gases? A star's gravity keeps the burning gas molecules from hurling out into space.
yeah i would imagine a big burst with actually a small fraction of it actually staying, because fusion creates loads of pressures and when it starts its loads of atoms being fused at once.
So Jupiter is basically a star-like object that is too cold to become a star and is too light to have materials fuse. You look at Betelgeuse, the largest known star, and our sun is much smaller-as in it is the size of a quarter or a dollar coin compared to the largest star. Jupiter is smaller than our sun, but not that small compared to our other planets of you compare their circumference to it. All of this space mumbo-jumbo is interesting.
Google and other sources say that the smallest brown dwarfs are 10-20 times the mass of Jupiter, therefore Jupiter can not be a failed star; it didn't even go to star school.
In my opinion, I think they should use the term 'Star-like objects' and not 'planet-like objects'. Planet-like could mean that the object is LIKE A planet, but not a planet. Yes I realize this could fit in as a reason to call it a 'planet-like object' but Star-like means it's like a star. But not. Star-like could mean that it's a failed star, close to being a star, or pretty much is a star but yet isn't. Planet-like is kinda like the case with Pluto. It is a planet but yet kinda isn't in a way. Welp I'm bored so no more reasons-
So,if we can somehow heat up the jupiter(or other bodies similar to jupiter in other systems) we can cook ourselves a star from it? Imagine the possibilities.As endless as space-time itself.I fucking love science.
In order for Jupiter to sustain hydrogen-fusion in its' core it would have to be at least 76 times its current mass. Jupiter is also too small to be a brown-dwarf in order to be a brown-dwarf it would have to be at 13 times its current mass (At 13 Jupiter-masses a gas-giant is big enough to have Deuterium-Fusion in its' core).
Okay people, it is time for us to STOP referring to objects in the solar system as if they were part of the business world. Jupiter is what it is and has not FAILED at anything. In the same way Pluto was not demoted, but was reclassified because of new information, and Ceres was not promoted from Asteroid to Dwarf Planet either.
Gas giants deserve their own category. Planets should have solid surface, that can exist even without atmosphere, and is not marginal (like small iron core inside gas giant). And objects should be named stars only if they produce their own light thanks to nuclear fusion. So anything between this should be in own gas giant category. Maybe give it some new dope name, like titans or something.
Technically Jupiter is considered a Brown Dwarf, and a small one at that, composition similar to the sun, however brown dwarfs have a tendancy to burn Lithium, rather than the hydrogen present in Jupiter, some of the smaller brown dwarves can have sizes around 10-13x larger than jupiter, I just got a 98 on a presentation about these things and then I see this video.
It is generally agreed that Jupiter could have been a star but didn't gain enough mass. That's why we don't live in a binary star system like most systems.
Perhaps we should call them celestial masses, so CM.. Then code it based on its energy state solid liquid gas plasma. I could write the entire classification system but I think you can figure it out..
Is a star a failed Jupiter?
No yes
yes, absolutely true hahahahha
Justin Salazar this sort of concept flip, fits in wonderfully here! Thank you for developing a unique spin on this idea.
Everything is exactly what it should be. That is why it is what it is.
Gas Giant Jupiter
Since jupiter and the sun actually rotate around a center point of gravity instead of Jupiter orbiting the sun, and seeing the composition being so close to each other, could our solar system be a failed binary star system?
No, because this video is very misleading. Jupiter is 13 times too light to be a rown dwarf, it's less of a failed sar and more of a gas giant- a large planet with a similar composition to a star. Saying Jupiter is star-like is comparable to saying a pebble is boulder-like.
more like a very successful planet!
Know How yeah
Know How or a robber it stole some materials from Mars that's why Mars is so small
It's the fat child that ate everything before the others can.
Know How to
I like your attitude!
50% of the stars in the solar systems are duel complex systems so they have 2 stars orbiting each other and planets go around 2 stars. I think Jupiter was supposed to be the 2nd star but there wasn't enough mass to create a 2nd star.
Where'd the other 79 jupiters go?
Jupiter is probably a failed red dwarf star considering red dwarfs are the most abundant stars in the universe. Also more than 50% of all star systems have multiple stars orbiting each other. Maybe if the cloud that became Jupiter was a little warmer we would be living in a double star system. But then maybe we wouldn't be here without big brother Jupiter protecting us from collisions by space debris. Let's just be happy Jupiter failed to get its engine going.
Your voice sounds like Grian
Space Cat Agreed!
Agree
You watch Grian too?
Panther yea
Space Cat ikr
hey fly to jupiter and when it rains IT RAINS COMORESSED CARBON THAT MEANS DIAMONDS!!!
Paper Valley _ diamonds are worthless. Prices are artificially inflated by the wedding industry. Engagement rings aren't even a century old.
You mean *Compressed Carbon
"Fly to jupiter" and die in less than 30minutes. ITS A GAS GIANT its mostly made out of gas that means you cant land on it
solid core
Paper Valley _ one word
Heat proof metal that nets the diamonds and make it rain
And die because they’re still rocks
Hey earthlings can you feed me so i can become a star plz?
🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍟🍟🍟🍟🍟🍟🍪🍪🍪🍪🍪🍪🍫🍫🍫🍫🍫🍫🍫🍩🍩🍩🍩🍩🍩🍩🍩🍭🍭🍭🍭🎂🎂🎂🎂🎂🎂
NOM NOM NOM NOM
Why don't you ask some of your moons instead?
only IO can feed me with volcano gas
Jupiter The Giant mercury and Venus are expended le how a bout them
jupiter is a failed everything which makes it more lovable and relatable. we are like jupiter.
Ray Speak for yourself 😂
@@firstname3255 Lmaao, you're evil.
Lol what about me
@@RandomWhaleAndStuff you keep flexing those rings, Saturn. But you are wonderful.
Ray Thank you so much
Jupiter is a 'STANET'
Or a "Plar"
Or a 'Planar'
Mozery
Planar sounds like a legitimate astronomical world, sort of like a pulsar
I think we should use the terms "slobject" and "plobject" for star-like and planet-like objects, respectively. Descriptive, but also funny sounding.
Aka brown dwarf
thank you for the nice videos
Glad you enjoy them! :-)
Mexx mexx
Mexx mexx Jupiter is my fav
Should of used Holst's Jupiter, or parts of it, in the background :P
(The Piece)
67 flat earthers disliked this video
icyburger they are cancer to science and knowledge
I've not disliked this vid, but I dislike the title, there's plenty of time for Jupiter to become a new star.
Flat earthers are no more full of shit than the crap being spewed in this video.
that's a really original name
Change that to 256 flat earthers
But did Jupiter get left of bad and boujee? 🧐
That’s the real question. 🧐
getoffmyd what's a boujee?
OK, I'm not entirely fine with your answer.
First, the word planet has clearly been defined by the International Astronomical Union in 2006:
A planet must:
- be massive enough to be spherical, but not massive enough to undergo nuclear reactions (otherwise it's a star)
- be orbiting around its star
- have cleared its orbit from any major object (otherwise it's a dwarf planet like Pluto)
Now a Brown dwarf is a little bit more problematic to define, however, it's aggreed that a brown dwarf must be massive enough to allow the combustion of deuterium, but not enough to undergo the fusion of hydrogen into helium. Thus a brown dwarf must be at least 13 times more massive than Jupiter.
In consequence, Jupiter is far from being a brown dwarf.
What might confuse you is the similarity of the size of Jupiter and of brown dwarf, however, if we were to increase the mass of Jupiter (in order to allow the planet to burn deuterium like a brown dwarf), it is believed that Jupiter would shrink, because of the stronger gravitational effects.
GardIsPureOwned well asteroid comets and meteors pass through the orbit of planets so the orbits are not 100% clean
Of course, the orbits cannot be 100% clean, for exemple, we know that the inner solar system is a bit dusty: there is a kind of ring of particules that spreads from Mercury to well beyond Earth (this is called the zodiac cloud). You forgot the word "major", for exemple, you can't find any object with a diameter of let's say 500km.
Also, commets, asteroids and meteor aren't on the same orbit that the Earth, they just cross it. What I meant is that you can't find them orbiting near the Earth.
What about rouge planets
Rouge planet? I assume you mean rogue planet don't you? Well this kind of planet is a planet that has been ejected of its orbit by another massive body. What I'm going to say is just an assumption, but I think that we keep calling them planets because it's just more convenient to say, given that they would be planets if they hadn't been ejected in the first place, in this case we add the word "rogue" only to specify that they have actually been ejected, but that they would be planets if it hadn't happen.
It’s funny how you copy and pasted this😂
I think 13 Jupiter masses should be about the limit of a brown dwarf, because I believe that's where you get deuterium fusion which would allow the brown dwarf to emit energy of its own enough to even be visible from up close, but I do agree that the line is kind of fuzzy given composition and atmospheric dynamics, because Jupiter almost certainly would look like a low mass brown dwarf.
Great video man I can see in a year you will get to 100k Subs at this rate. If you want to grow faster do videos on Space News like what are Future missions to space, how to colonize moons and Planets how much that would cost and your educated guess on when it will happen try it out for a month and you will see growth with my ideas. I had subscribed to you
How about the red spot on Jupiter?
3 years later still less than 40k subcribers.
It is still a theory as to how Stars are formed. I truly believe that it needs to be restructured, maybe then will we find better answers.
Thank you for posting this video and explaining the differences between a star and a planet, especially when it comes to both of them having a similar mass. As you probably know, the Juno spacecraft has answered some of the questions about the formation of Jupiter.
Nucular fusion ... *twitch*
The channel lost me with that word.
Yes mark tuson and suphi sarigollu, that's where they lost me. There is no such thing a nucular medicine scan, a nucular power plant, nucular fusion, or nucular energy. That drives me absolutely fucking crazy. IT'S NUCLEAR! GAWD!
Your voice is very soothing
What would be cool to me would be to witness the moment of solar ignition in a star. I don't think we've ever observed that moment when a star begins the fusion process.
Just found your channel and I really like it. Keep up the good work!
To be a brown dwarf, a failed star where the gravity collapsed faster then it heated up..creating abnormal matter, making fusion impossible. But still brown dwarfs are like 10 20 times jupiters mass, gas giants and brown dwarfs are one thing on the same way, only the moment it stopped is different, making all of these things the most common in the universe, since most are 3. or 4. generation objects
Jupiter is not a Brown Dwarf. Brown Dwarves typically have 12-30x the mass of Jupiter. They also fuse deuterium and lithium.
Hello deuterium does not madder it's only the mass burns hydrogen=star
Can we put jupiter on fire?
Failed star? maybe it just hasn't got there yet, maybe it's a star in the making. Considering how short a time frame these astronomy experts have had to study these topics, for them to say with any certainty that they know exactly what's going on, I find (fascinating) hard to believe. Maybe our solar system hasn't gotten to the two star system just yet?
Jupiter: God, can you make me a star?
God: yeah, sure, wethever
Jupiter: Thanks man
God: jk
This made me think of what would happen if you took fire to Jupiter....
I mean, its 91% helium, and I cant remember if it was flamable
Woah woah woah, Jupiter is too LIGHT!? WHAT?
Yep.
For a star..... Jupiter is huge planet
Thefunnyboy08 08 it’s too light to be a star. As far as planets go it’s very heavy.
by using my common sense... because its a GAS giant? and gas is light?
Lots of gas is still heavy
"Not quite a star, not quite a planet" - Buddy, that's not quite new as well but thanks for spilling it out for me.
I'm glad we have this controversial vacuum keeping us somewhat safe.
Me:Ima light a match let’s see wat happens
NASA: NO DO-
Earth: why tf is their another sun?
U can't light up a match at Jupiter because there's no Oxygen
When sun become red giant do Jupiter get enough rise in temperature to fuse hydrogen into helium...??
Veeresh well no, sure the temperature will rise but you need a few million degrees to start fusing atoms together, this can’t be obtained with Jupiter’s rather small mass compared to suns, it would take 72 Jupiter’s just to create a brown dwarf. To answer your question, in order for nuclear fusion to occur, the object has to have, gas and lots of it, needs to be at the very least of 72 Jupiter’s, and needs it’s core temperature constantly changing but balanced in the million-two million degrees Celsius range.
well technicaly in this definition jupiter is a brown dwarf because it emits infrared radiation and emits more energy than receives from Sol our sun.
KidsLive a brown dwarf fuses deuterium which is a different form of hydrogen so if it doesn't fuse deuterium then it not a brown dwarf plus human give off infrared
Veeresh, check out the Electric Universe
ruclips.net/video/t7EAlTcZFwY/видео.html
Our sun's Jewish?
Jupiter would require at least a 75 fold increase in mass to become a star. It's already 1000 times less massive than the sun and hence it would be sweet very small star at that. In addition I think you have confused the terms diameter and mass for brown dwarves. Brown dwarves have a similar diameter to jupiter but are tens of times more massive. That said I suppose it depends in the definition of brown dwarves because they radiate heat through compression, as does jupiter, which radiates more heat than it receives from the sun so maybe...
Then why is Pluto not a fucking planet
Thanks for the support 😊
Astronomic no problem your videos are so fun
Pluto isn't a planet because it hasn't cleared all the crap from it's orbit, and it's not even the largest body in it's obit anyway >_>
Minty4141 idc ima still think it’s a planet because I told it was for half my life
Just because you were told something and believed it, doesn't mean it was true. Do you still belive in Santa Claus or the Tooth Fairy just because your parents told you they exist?
I'd say so far that a planet is:
an object which is or was large enough to clear it's obit with it's parent star and has enough mass to form into a sphere. A planet is also incapable of fusion and can have been ejected from it's parent star.
All these worlds are yours.
SPACETV you late. This video is old
You can google this > “ALL THESE WORLDS ARE YOURS - EXCEPT EUROPA.
ATTEMPT NO LANDINGS THERE.”
Loved this movie big time, this was quoted from. After Jupiter was made very dense by the monolith, the planet ignited into a star.
Geoffr524 Glad to see that I wasnt the only one who thought of that movie.
or the book
I'm really surprised you didn't mention how Jupiter emits more radiation than absorbs from the Sun
I am watching this at 28/11/2017
Exactly one year later
There is no 28 month??
HayItsEmmy 28th November 2017
Day/Month/Year the British/European way to write the date
The music is awesome and fit so well
Great video
I subscribed you . You deserve at least 1 million subscribers . You are better than pbs spacetime . Keep it up .
😂 thanks
Speaking of hydrogen, how does the amount of hydrogen comprised in Jupiter compare to the amount of hydrogen in Earth's oceans? I know the Earth is tiny compared to Jupiter itself, hence my curiosity.
hey, don't know if you have heard but you tube updated the way views work so dont be surprised if your views drop.
Hey, yeah I've heard their changing the algorhythms a little, to focus more on daily uploads and 'trending' videos. But I'll keep uploading regardless, I also operate on other platforms, so my views and subs can still increase. Even if RUclips doesn't care about my content, I'll carry on! ;-) p.s. Thanks fot the support!!! :-D
of course! always love seeing a video in my sub box by you.
You Saturn
So if this did become a star, our system would have been a binary solar system?
You sound like Harry Potter
Well structured, great job man
Thank you 😊👍🏻
God is not done yet. the universe is still being created!!
God died in 1993
Lyric Birb “And the heaven We created with might, and indeed We are (its) expander.” (Quran 51:47) ah yes the universe is not done. For it befits Allah that he is constantly creating.
Sabir Khan brainwashed
Sabir Khan
Written by humans during the period where praying/sacrificing was believed to create rain...
Orange Broom yes, some religions now still believe that sacrificing their people will do so. So your point Islam is not of these false or twisted from the original versions those peoples prophets brought them. We do believe praying for rain sort of. But whats wrong with that. Their are two things that must be done for something in Islam for most things: pray and action. That is what separates from wishful thinking.
All the planets had the same composition as the sun when they formed. The lighter ones didn't have enough gravity to hold on to the hydrogen and helium, which were stripped away by the solar wind. There is no difference between a large planet and a failed star.
Hey nice video! On a different subject. I heard that between Earth and our moon you can fit all the planets in our solar system (Theoretically of curse). Is that true?
Yes this is true, from just a measurement point of view! With all the planets lined next to one another, they would have 4,990 miles (8,030km) to spare, using the average Earth-moon distance of 238,555 miles! :-)
Nice! Thanks for answering my question!
Nibiru is a hoax, and Nemesis is a scientific hypothesis which has been pretty much discredited.
Nibiru isn't a hoax, it was destroyed when it collided with Tiamat, thus creating the asteroid belt.
Panther jupiter is nibiru....
Well, according the the movie "2010: Space odessey 2", millions of monoliths surround Jupiter and condense its mass enough for it to go nuclear. (Its still a great movie from the 80's, if you get the chance to see it - shame they never made movies of the 2 remaining space odessey books in the series)
More successful than the earth
juancho miguel bermejo Telling someone to kill theirselves leads to A lawsuit.
According to average idiot kid in internet, Everyone Rule the internet
Canned Bread Earth is full of hatred and such, Humans ruined Earth... But Jup is still a lot more successful than Earth is just because of Us Humans.
U will need 75 Jupiter's to make a brown dwarf and brown dwarf don't have the same composition as a star. The difference is that stars contain hydrogen and brown dwarfs contain hydrogen however it has a lot of lithium. Brown dwarf appear to be green whereas stars can appear from red to blue spectrum
I often asked myself that question,
because many systems are binary star systems,
we are lucky that we are not, but jupiter could have been a second star
robert charlton Not even close, not even with all the mass from the planets, dwarf planets, asteroids, or commets
There are 2 out come...
1.
There would be a habital zone and would possible have life on one of its moons
2.
It would give off more heat and earth wouldnt be habital
Not quite a star or a planet so its a lightskin 🤔🤔🤔👽🤔
If a planet is defined as a celestial object in orbit around a star and has cleared its neighborhood, then Jupiter is a planet and not a star like object. If, on the other hand, Jupiter was wandering through the cosmos on its own, but was carrying with it other celestial objects that were orbiting it, I would consider it to be a star like object.
Of course, I'm not an astronomer - not even an amateur astronomer - so, I'm merely expressing my lay person's opinion.
I believe Jupiter was a forming star but a slightly smaller planet crash in to it and mixing there atmosphere together, distroying its chance for fusion but creating the red spot.
Joel VELEZ Crashed* Destroyed* Their*
Plus a planet sized object colliding into something like Jupiter can't create a storm. That's all the Great Red Spot is. It's a storm that has been around 300 years and grew in size by consuming other storms on its gaseous surface.
But you're wrong... Red spot is not at all that old.
Sille Amalie its 300 years old
The red spot is estimated to be only 3-4 hundred years old.
Jupiter formed almost 4.5 Billion years ago.
Joel VELEZ the great red spot is only around 600-500 years old
Makes me wonder what it would take to ignite Jupiter, and what would be the effect here on earth once it was lit.
But I guess that unless somebody has a good interplanetary spaceship they aren't using... and a really big match... we won't be able to get any answers to this one any time soon.
Jupiter is a star with 51 planets.
69*
Silver Werewolf 63*
Actually 67.
Silver Werewolf And one hell of a werewolf problem.
*79
One thing where did you get the cool Pictures though its cool!👍
Anyone saw the film 2010?
Ben Larsen never heard of it
Jupiter has a metalic hydrogen core, which is a solid core. The Sun on the other hand has a liquid core!
Technically Jupiter does not orbit the sun they both orbit each other at a point just outside of the sun
Riptide _ jupiter makes the sun wobble if it did orbit the sun the center of mass would be out side of our sun
Jupiter has gravity only 2.4 times more than Earth, how is that enough to make the Sun wobble?
Orange Broom all the planets make the sun wobble to a certain degree, it's just that none are quite as massive as Jupiter. The same way the moon makes our oceans wobble.
Me: Randomly coughs a lot then lungs hurt
Also me: "hOOOlyy fUucK"
Mom: " WHAT THA FECK DID YOU SAY?????"
If Jupiter is a failed star, why would it be orbiting another star? If it was even a star, it wouldn't be orbiting another star.
RedViking I think it's because of Jupiter's mass, which is relatively smaller compared to the sun, that it is bound by the sun's gravity. Jupiter qualifies to be called a failed star because of its composition (H, He and no heavy elements).
I'm certainly not an expert, but that's just my humble opinion on the question in your comment.
What surprised me more in this video is the fact that the Sun and Jupiter still have almost identical composition. I understand they formed from the same material, but the sun has been fusing H to He for billions of years, and Jupiter hasn't been. So how are they identical? I'm sure I'm missing something here..but would like to hear what the more knowledgeable folks here have to say.
Sorry I must have missed your comment. Jupiter seems to have the same composition as a star (mainly hydrogen and helium), but the internal pressure in the planet can’t produce nuclear fusion, mainly because of it’s density, volume and mass.
This video basically explains that given more material from it’s formation, Jupiter could have started nuclear processes and ignited into a star.
Also not forgetting, the most common system of stars in the galaxy are binary star systems. These systems can evolve into one star orbiting the other, like Jupiter orbiting the Sun.
Thanks for the question! :-)
Astronomic Thank you for the reply. Was not expecting it. :)
I agree with what you just explained in your reply, and also in your video. My question is on their composition.
Sun: Fusing H to He for billions of years, Jupiter: Not doing that (which means H% should be more), but still has same composition as the Sun.
If the Sun and Jupiter were formed out of the same material, shouldn't they have different composition by now? Hope my question is less confusing this time! :)
Stars do orbit other stars, they are called binary star systems, there are also trinary stars, that's 3 stars orbiting each other, and multiple star systems with several or more stars orbiting each other
@ RedViking : You assume that it is a failed star, because you were not there to observe Jupiter when it was in its brown dwarf glowing mode! However, the Ancients knew better and they tell us about it with other words than the modern day vocabulary.
If Jupiter had been massive enough to become a star, that would mean that Earth as we know it, wouldn't exist, right?
Third dislike XD
Random gooy dat not nice
Me:ok it’s just your opinion.
Undertale fan:Your just a hator :(
Random gooy Not cool bro
Ecks dee
Alucard ECKS DEE ECKS DEE
A brown dwarf is /not/ similar in mass to Jupiter, the minimum mass to qualify as a brown dwarf would be 13 times the mass of Jupiter, and on up to just below the lowest-mass stars at 75 to 80 times the mass of Jupiter.
What if we somehow turn Jupiter into a star? Will we have two stars like in the Star Wars movie?
Never thought about it this way
Great info. I love astronomy. This video gives me a window to understand and discover more about jupiter
Thanks! Glad to help 😊
Yep. It was the sun before our previous sun. Saturn prior to that. So you can guess Uranus, Neptune and Pluto preceded as well. Look at the sun one day it will look like Pluto.
That is the beauty of our universe.
I just thought that if Jupiter was a “star” wouldn’t it’s moons be classed as planets or just still moons? If that’s the case we would have a solar system inside a solar system. I’m a bit confused...
Apparently scientists tried to nuke Jupiter to make a second star, or had plans to nuke it so that we could live on one of it's moons. How is Jupiter gonna be a star, if it isn't heavy enough to hold those burned gases? A star's gravity keeps the burning gas molecules from hurling out into space.
yeah i would imagine a big burst with actually a small fraction of it actually staying, because fusion creates loads of pressures and when it starts its loads of atoms being fused at once.
Jupiters parents: You are a failure
So Jupiter is basically a star-like object that is too cold to become a star and is too light to have materials fuse.
You look at Betelgeuse, the largest known star, and our sun is much smaller-as in it is the size of a quarter or a dollar coin compared to the largest star.
Jupiter is smaller than our sun, but not that small compared to our other planets of you compare their circumference to it.
All of this space mumbo-jumbo is interesting.
Google and other sources say that the smallest brown dwarfs are 10-20 times the mass of Jupiter, therefore Jupiter can not be a failed star; it didn't even go to star school.
Star-like-planet objects, solved the dispute, dropped the mic
Jupiter: Can I be a star, pleeeeeease!!!!
The Solar System: Uhhh... No, but uh... you can still be a successful planet... uh...
Jupiter: FML
This might be a dumb question but is there anything solid on Jupiter can you stand on it or somewhere idk I'm confused
In my opinion, I think they should use the term 'Star-like objects' and not 'planet-like objects'. Planet-like could mean that the object is LIKE A planet, but not a planet. Yes I realize this could fit in as a reason to call it a 'planet-like object' but Star-like means it's like a star. But not. Star-like could mean that it's a failed star, close to being a star, or pretty much is a star but yet isn't. Planet-like is kinda like the case with Pluto. It is a planet but yet kinda isn't in a way.
Welp I'm bored so no more reasons-
That's why this
Asteroids: He He. Earth Go boo-BOOM
Jupiter: He's too dangerous to be left alive.
You make cool videos, I subbed 👏🖒
Thanks!! 😊👍🏻👍🏻
Jupiter is like a mini star with 60+ planets revolving around
So,if we can somehow heat up the jupiter(or other bodies similar to jupiter in other systems) we can cook ourselves a star from it? Imagine the possibilities.As endless as space-time itself.I fucking love science.
In order for Jupiter to sustain hydrogen-fusion in its' core it would have to be at least 76 times its current mass. Jupiter is also too small to be a brown-dwarf in order to be a brown-dwarf it would have to be at 13 times its current mass (At 13 Jupiter-masses a gas-giant is big enough to have Deuterium-Fusion in its' core).
Nicely done!
Thanks 😀👍🏻
what is this piece of music called??
anyone know the name of the background music ?
Stop picking on Jupiter! He’s trying his best okay!
#stopJupiterAbuse
Okay people, it is time for us to STOP referring to objects in the solar system as if they were part of the business world. Jupiter is what it is and has not FAILED at anything. In the same way Pluto was not demoted, but was reclassified because of new information, and Ceres was not promoted from Asteroid to Dwarf Planet either.
3:05 - flat Jupiter, period! :D
Gas giants deserve their own category. Planets should have solid surface, that can exist even without atmosphere, and is not marginal (like small iron core inside gas giant). And objects should be named stars only if they produce their own light thanks to nuclear fusion. So anything between this should be in own gas giant category. Maybe give it some new dope name, like titans or something.
“Ultra cool brown dwarf” 😎
Technically Jupiter is considered a Brown Dwarf, and a small one at that, composition similar to the sun, however brown dwarfs have a tendancy to burn Lithium, rather than the hydrogen present in Jupiter, some of the smaller brown dwarves can have sizes around 10-13x larger than jupiter, I just got a 98 on a presentation about these things and then I see this video.
How many Jupiters would you have to combine to get fusion ?
It is generally agreed that Jupiter could have been a star but didn't gain enough mass. That's why we don't live in a binary star system like most systems.
Perhaps we should call them celestial masses, so CM.. Then code it based on its energy state solid liquid gas plasma. I could write the entire classification system but I think you can figure it out..
Hes like passed all class from kinder to highschool but failed College