Rebel Talent: Why it Pays to Break the Rules | Professor Gino | Talks at Google
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 июн 2024
- Note from Talks at Google: This speaker's research is currently under investigation.
This talk is based on her new book, Rebel Talent: Why It Pays to Break the Rules at Work and in Life. Prof. Gino has spent more than a decade studying “rebels” at organizations around the world, from high-end boutiques in Italy’s fashion capital, to the World’s Best Restaurant, to a thriving fast food chain, to an award-winning computer animation studio. In her work, she identifies leaders and employees who exemplify “rebel talent,” and whose examples we can all learn to embrace.
Get the book here: goo.gl/byBDfH
It’s safe to say that this woman appreciates that it pays to break the rules
She might've taken this principle a bit too seriously
Narrator: it doesn’t pay to break the rules.
Clearly it does. She got years of Harvard salary & several books & speaking engagements then she’s gonna get a redemption book deal in a few years when the next election is over.
@@InappropriateShorts Ya. As I also write in a separate comment here, she is suing the accusers and Harvard now, she might win these cases on technicality and get compensated with millions of dollars. Breaking rules obviously pays, at least for her.
the awful thing was her raw data manipulation was very transparent as a fake, if she were more skillful she would go undetected and she would be regarded as a leading theorist @@sunway1374
It pays to break the rules, until you get caught and outed as a fraud.
"Why it Pays to Break the Rules" -- this has not aged well.
This is exactly the comment I came here for
😂😂😂
Aged like milk. 😂
This aged like fine milk
Who is watching after the latest news?
She certainly lives what she preaches
Well she certainly is proof that it pays to break the rules. Good riddance to this fraud
Theranos, Titan and this girl are so examples of breaking the rules
Lol, this title did not age well :D
Break rules by faking data.
HAhahaha... The irony of Francesca Gino talking about "Why it Pays to Break the Rules!"
No irony. She did get paid well by Harvard and companies she had given talks and done consulting. Now she is suing the accuser and Harvard, she could win by technicality (Harvard didn't follow their own guidelines in investigation and suspending her) and gets compensated with a LOT of money.
I think that if you don’t have standards of behavior that you refuse to compromise, if you don’t have incorruptible values, then you risk treading a slippery slope where you can begin to justify all sorts of pathological behavior
Yup
A most unfortunate title to your video. Who could have foreseen someone from Harvard Business being super shady?
People like this should be made to pay for misleading public and ill influencing the society
Francesca Gino quote, "Even when I lie, I tell the truth."
Welcome to current year: June 26, 2023 NPR: Harvard professor who studies dishonesty is accused of falsifying data.
Oh, the irony!..
"Why it pays to break the rules? I mean... just look at me..."
She Apply her own rules , Bravo I'm impressed
Braking the rules turned this mediocre researcher into a renowned scientist.
Steve Jobs is her first example. Recall that Jobs was one of the organizers of a wage-fixing scheme which affected Google employees. Maybe "breaking the rules" is not such a great idea.
This is one of those times where context is everything;
A politician who is a "rebel" we call corrupt
A sportsperson who is a "rebel" we call a cheat
A person who breaks the rules and is a "rebel" we call a criminal
I'm not too sure it's a good idea to advocate breaking the rules yes it may be profitable for the individual, maybe not such a good outcome for the collective.
Yes, this is one time where context is everything, but unintentional consequences is the risk in radical thinking.
ikm64 You’re so naïve!
@@Holistic_Islam If you think crime doesn't pay, I feel it's you that's naive. Oh, and the biggest criminals are the ones who wear a suit and tie and have a college degree. Intellectual gobbledegook and not well-argued gobbledegook at that. Be different, be the same, be a rebel without a cause, think outside the box.......but wait! that thinking thing, no leave that to the bosses, when they want your opinion they'll give you theirs, no need for you to think about anything. It works up to now so why change anything.
Seems more like equivocation. Perhaps if you'd have presented the places where rebels drive things forward it would seems less so. Usually this is a bucking of tradition. Elvis, The Beatles and Rolling Stones for music. Elon Musk for spaceships and electric vehicles. The Founding Father's and the Constitution of the United States. It is the rebels that carry humanity into the future. The rebels that explore. The Leif Ericsons that discover America. It's the rebels that create new products like the personal computer that the head of IBM once said would never exist.
So while you aren't wrong, you're certainly cherry picking. My question, what motivates you to try and tear down this observation? My bet, you're a rule follower. The Rebel is the antithesis to who you are. And my examples come quick and easy because I identify closely with being a Rebel.
@ Yes Keith I am conservative and believe in following rules and libertarian in allowing the most personal freedoms possible all the while staying within the rules we collectively share and are collectively bound by.
That doesn't mean I'm against thinking "out of the box" which is a very different proposition than being a rebel.
Let use the definition of a "rebel" I am only talking about here, Source Cambridge Dictionary "Rebel"
"a person who is opposed to the political system in their country and tries to change it using force"
The key word I am taking from this is "force" and you might get where I'm coming from being, a libertarian.
You use artistic examples of rule breakers "Elvis" etc but that's not the context the argument is based on...
"Why It Pays to Break the Rules at Work and in Life". His stated context. "Work" and "life" affect other peoples rights and infringers by definition impinge on those rights. Which reverts back to my first sentence.
"This is one of those times where context is everything;"
@@ikm64 you take life too seriously. It's called a colloquialism. A word you should look up. And you seem very confused about libertarian principles with all your talk of rules and allusions to the social contract. Conservative? Most certainly. Libertarian, about as much as Bill Maher.
She has launched a few law suits on the accusers and Harvard, so it may still pay for her. Also, Harvard who has been paying her salary, and all these companies who had paid her handsome speaker and consulting fees are not suing to get their money back. So, she is correct in a way.
oh dear, the internet never forgets
Plot twist: there's no behavioural science basis for her activities. She just enjoys making google employees do stupid things.
her research. discounting its fake anyways, is very superficial to say the best-incredible that such shallow research would lead to conferences, talks and books...and now we know its a hoax anyways Harvard is overrated
"We laugh at honour and are shocked to find traitors in our midst." - C.S. Lewis, The abolition of Man
Following the rules is also a good way to keep your job
She definitely deserves a jail term.
I agree. She stolen money by cheating and damage careers of other researchers by depriving them of honest opportunities.
yes she was paid for books and conferences-at the very least the publishers and conference organizators should sue her to get their money back-if not jail time honey surely this falls under embezelment laws
This hasn't aged well. Gino should either defend (no possible) or renounce (not likely) her research. Harvard needs to act on academic grifers.
It pays to be a rebel and break the rules unless you question gender stereotypes at Google like James Damore 😂 Even if those questions help women.
Now she’s exposed as a fraud. 🤭schadenfreude🤡
the irony of the title 🤣🤣
Oh, she knows how to break rules all right..
this aged well.
40:41 Thank God she stopped before telling us "many more stories."
New Talk: Why it doesn't pay to break the rules
She didn't just break the rules, she faked her research.
Time for Google to take this video down
Great great talk 👏
💀💀
💀
Nope
"while the law shielded him from being fired solely for criticizing Google, it did not protect discriminatory statements, that his memo's "statements regarding biological differences between the sexes were so harmful, discriminatory, and disruptive as to be unprotected", and that these "discriminatory statements", not his criticisms of Google, were the reason for his firing.[3][4][5][48]"
👀👀
The irony of this title
Whats up with the variating soundquality? RUclips?
Ahahhahaha this is still on RUclips!
Indeed
Pays huh???!!?! Are you sure? How did that workout for you?
The Baltimore Case repeats itself? 🤭
my curiosity comes alive the minute I walk out of work and I explore society and the world the organisation is like a chastity belt its afraid of my mind
PHD in faking data
Research, La Cosa Nostra Mafia style
The irony
Female Stockton Rush, who praised breaking the rules and was caught while doing so.
Pays unless you question Google's cult diversity programmes
Are people paid for talking nonsense for an hour? Can someone tell me what exactly is the message in this video that demands a Harvard professor to deliver it?
FRAUD LOL
Like James Damore did? yeah sure the Google gestapo will end you. You have no credibility
how does that mean Francesca has no credibility? She's actually pushing back against the types of ideas that made Google punish Damore.
@@alexanderleeart this aged like milk 😂😂
@@alexanderleeartI think you got your answer
Not really
Eek
Do as I do not as I say or something
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Why am I not surprised that a plagiarist and data fabulous was invited to talk at Google. lol
Ummmmm, a delicious Italian pizza sounds pretty good right now
Hilarious
Her research AKA drivel
the rebels sound like common sense is this how thick and dumbed down people are that ordering a pizza seen as revolutionary think you need me at Google you got too many geeks needs a normal person
Or maybe you're just a Rebel. I feel the same so often that these sort of things seem simple as can be. But then I realize over and over again that the way I think is extremely foreign to almost everyone. They aren't so much dumb as conformist. 98% of kindergartners are genius level creatives. By adulthood it is 2% genius level. This is indicative of the school system created by the industrial revolution. And creativity is a huge component of being a Rebel. So maybe be a little more generous towards these "dummies."
discounting the fakery, her research is superficial at best Oh dear if this is an example of a Harvard intellectual than Harvard is overrated
Oh the irony currently... 😂
all good as don't work in a gvt department then seen as a problem becomes a disciplinary only people with money can become rebels as bills need to be paid in low wage economies feel I no longer want to perform as no reward
So, no, Thomas Crabtree and Geode and Collected Reader and Karen. Guilded cages might look nice to you, but women aren't objectively 'helped' by them. How do people graduate with views like Thomas'? Like, what professors sign off like this kid's ready to go out and contribute in the world?
provocative discrimination isn't talented, brave rebellion against unnecessary corporate convention that has been holding back society.
You guys should put a disclaimer or something, warn people that this woman is a fraud.
Such a cliché the way she talks and argues, people willing to go far to get under the spotlight
This did not age well.
F.
Like, plagiarism? 😂😂😂
did not age well
that didnt age well at all. lol
Which came first the chicken or the egg....or, contemporaneously, which came first, the fabricator or the many fruits of fabrication?