Palo Alto VPN - Site to Site step by step configuration [2024]

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 25 ноя 2024
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 46

  • @netsums
    @netsums  9 месяцев назад +1

    FREE Palo Alto Cheat Sheet in different formats and further FREE resources: netsums.com/resources

  • @MrAlccosta
    @MrAlccosta 24 дня назад +1

    I just found you on Internet. This video is amazing!. Your didactic is superb!

    • @MrAlccosta
      @MrAlccosta 24 дня назад

      Ricardo! Eu sabia que seu sotaque em Ingles era do Brasil! Muito bom canal! Estou comecando com Palo-Alto e seus videos ajudarao muito. Abracos aqui do Canada em 2024!

    • @netsums
      @netsums  24 дня назад

      Hahaha. Pois é, o sotaque me entrega. :-) grande abraço, fico feliz que os vídeos podem te ajudar!

  • @siddeeq3712
    @siddeeq3712 Год назад +1

    Excellent video my friend. Keep up the good work.

    • @netsums
      @netsums  Год назад

      Thank you for the comment, I'm glad you liked it. :)

    • @Cybersecurity689
      @Cybersecurity689 Год назад

      Palo Alto Firewall Basic introduction about in GUI
      ruclips.net/video/5zzW87-VbhE/видео.html

  • @alfonsotrocciola4527
    @alfonsotrocciola4527 2 месяца назад

    Your videos are amazing and you explain things with passion, you want to make sure that we understand the topic, I really appriciate a lot this videos, a huge "thank you!" for sharing your knowledge

    • @netsums
      @netsums  2 месяца назад

      Thank you for your lovely comment, I'm happy you get some value from the videos. :-)

  • @benedictagyemang3862
    @benedictagyemang3862 5 месяцев назад

    Great training, very precise and right on point, thanks for sharing. I have already registered for your upcoming course. I am an avid learner and I always look forward to learning new information.

    • @netsums
      @netsums  5 месяцев назад +1

      Thank you for your comment, glad to be able to help!

    • @benedictagyemang3862
      @benedictagyemang3862 Месяц назад

      You are very welcome!

  • @kalibygomes3443
    @kalibygomes3443 8 месяцев назад

    Excelente aula, parabéns!

  • @kalibygomes3443
    @kalibygomes3443 8 месяцев назад

    Na expectativa pelo vídeo de VPN site to site baseada em politica e usando NAT!

    • @netsums
      @netsums  8 месяцев назад

      Olá, eu não estou encontrando mais o último e-mail que você me mandou, desculpe. Mas a sua configuração do Proxy-ID tem que ser feita com os endereços já traduzidos (endereços externos de NAT). As redes que você entra na configuração do Proxy-ID são as que vão ser "vistas" no túnel. A tradução do NAT já foi feita. Eu imagino que essa foi sua pergunta, certo? Eu estou planejando um vídeo sobre S2S baseado em política, só não sei quando vai ficar pronto. Qualquer coisa pode me escrever de novo. Abraços.

    • @kalibygomes3443
      @kalibygomes3443 8 месяцев назад

      Isso mesmo, muito obrigado!@@netsums

  • @giri455161
    @giri455161 2 месяца назад

    Really good explanation about the VPN configuration, please make the other video for Policy based VPN too or if you have already made it, please share me the link of that.

    • @netsums
      @netsums  2 месяца назад

      Tha k you for the comment. Here the link for the policy-based VPN video: ruclips.net/video/LeJVUjRCzKo/видео.html

  • @irvingcastro9971
    @irvingcastro9971 9 месяцев назад

    Hi, Great video.
    You should do also based on policies.
    Greetings from mexico.

    • @netsums
      @netsums  9 месяцев назад

      ¡Hola! Thanks, I'll keep it in mind for the upcoming videos. :-)

  • @jaydipparmar5653
    @jaydipparmar5653 9 месяцев назад +1

    @netsum , got 2 things to discuss, I was able to bring up tunnel between 2 Palo-Alto Firewalls without any Ipsec rule, just added specific rule for interesting(inside) subnet, any specific reason for adding it? 2nd thing, you've not used tunnel interface Ip anywhere, so I've tested without tunnel interface IP and it worked fine. I think we need tunnel interface ip only when we use dynamic routing protocol. Correct me if I'm wrong.

    • @jesurajpandiankamaraj6194
      @jesurajpandiankamaraj6194 9 месяцев назад

      Q1) I think the intra zone (OUTSIDE to OUTSIDE) traffic is allowed in PA firewalls by default.
      Q2) My understanding too same. IP on the tunnels needed for dynamic routing protocols.

    • @netsums
      @netsums  9 месяцев назад

      Hi @jaydipparmar5653. In my lab I changed the default intrazone rule from allow to deny (override using Panorama). I personally prefer it like this, I have more control on what's going through the firewall. But in a default configuration, you wouldn't need the IPSec rules, you're right.
      And yes, if you're using dynamic routing, you need the IP address on the tunnel. Another application would be if you have multiple tunnels and you want to monitor the tunnel availabilities (path monitoring). In this case, I would also suggest to add IP addresses to the tunnel interfaces and use the interface from one tunnel side to monitor the IP address on the other side.

  • @badral9
    @badral9 Год назад +1

    Hello Thank you for tutorial, Currently i have tunnel for GlobalProtect. Should we create separate tunnel for Site to Site VPN?

    • @netsums
      @netsums  Год назад

      Hi. I would always create separate tunnels for GlobalProtect and Site-2-Site. I don't see any reason why not to do it. :)

  • @belmarsadyt
    @belmarsadyt 6 месяцев назад

    Hi thank for your video very helpful as I trying to configure for the first time. S2S with Palo
    By the way I think there is some misteake or confusion during your explaination with your diagram.
    For example when you are configuring Ike GW you are in PA-VM ( as you said in the beginning)
    But show the other side (PA-440) ??
    Other thing your PA-VM has inside and outside interface 1/1. ?
    Thanks

    • @netsums
      @netsums  6 месяцев назад +1

      Ops, so I guess there are some mistakes in the video. I haven't noticed it, I need to watch it again, then. 😊 But I'm glad I still could help.

    • @belmarsadyt
      @belmarsadyt 6 месяцев назад

      @@netsumsone question, why configuring ip adresse for the tunnel, as this is only needed if you are using dynamic routing according to Palo documentation?
      Thanks

    • @netsums
      @netsums  6 месяцев назад +1

      IP addresses for the tunnel interfaces are also required if you want to enable tunnel monitoring. I don't remember anymore if I configured tunnel monitoring in this video. But if not, you're right, the IP addresses would be optional.

  • @ArslanAli-wh3yq
    @ArslanAli-wh3yq 7 месяцев назад

    Hi,
    How we can use the OSPF model instead of static routes?

    • @netsums
      @netsums  7 месяцев назад

      With OSPF you need an IP address for the tunnel interface. docs.paloaltonetworks.com/network-security/ipsec-vpn/administration/site-to-site-vpn-quick-configs/site-to-site-vpn-with-ospf

  • @seanbyrne960
    @seanbyrne960 8 месяцев назад

    hello I am using path monitoring on numbered Tunnels -- one firewall shows the path monitor up -- the second firewall shows the path monitor up -- have you come across this before ?

    • @netsums
      @netsums  8 месяцев назад

      Hi, I'm not sure I understand your question. If both firewalls are showing the path monitor up, than it's all good, right? :-) Or do you mean one of the firewalls is showing the path monitor down? In this case you should make sure that ping is allowed on both sides (in the tunnel management profile would be the first place I would look)?
      You could try using the CLI to ping the other side using the option to enter a source interface to test if both sides are answering to ping.

    • @seanbyrne960
      @seanbyrne960 8 месяцев назад +1

      thank you -- I have ping enabled both sides using the management profile and security policy config-- I ran a packet capture on both firewalls -firewall #2 has an address x.x.x.2 -firewall #1 has an address x.x.x.1-the traces show .1 ping & .2 reply -- > this explains why one path monitor probe is up-
      the capture shows the ping request from .2 is not responded toby .1 @@netsums

  • @shamimkamarudeen
    @shamimkamarudeen 11 месяцев назад

    why in the rule the source and destination zone is outside you selected ? it should be VPN-S2S and Inside right ????

    • @netsums
      @netsums  11 месяцев назад

      Can you please give me the timestamp? I will take a look

    • @shamimkamarudeen
      @shamimkamarudeen 11 месяцев назад

      @@netsums 16:44 source zone

    • @netsums
      @netsums  11 месяцев назад

      At this stage of the setup of the vpn connection, there is still no ipsec tunnel, and the gateways need to exchange their security information over the Internet. The only way for a gateway to reach your firewall over the internet would be though the outside zone. I hope I could make myself understandable. :)

  • @f1re_w1re67
    @f1re_w1re67 6 месяцев назад

    Awesome vid!

    • @netsums
      @netsums  6 месяцев назад

      Thanks, I'm glad you liked it

  • @0xRakan
    @0xRakan 8 месяцев назад

    Can we have a video doing s2s VPN between Palo and FTD firepower?

    • @netsums
      @netsums  8 месяцев назад

      Hi. I unfortunately don't have access to a Firepower in my lab.

    • @kkb8510
      @kkb8510 2 месяца назад

      @@netsums Hello Where do you think we can get a pal alto trial license from? ive tried cdw in the past and you never get anything from them palo related even if you make the order, so where else do you think we can get a license to lab on eve-ng? i already have the pa-vm image,

  • @hamidmahmood8483
    @hamidmahmood8483 11 месяцев назад

    what is the config on the router

    • @netsums
      @netsums  11 месяцев назад

      It has the simplest configuration you can imagine. It doesn't know any networks expect the locally connected ones.