Ricardo! Eu sabia que seu sotaque em Ingles era do Brasil! Muito bom canal! Estou comecando com Palo-Alto e seus videos ajudarao muito. Abracos aqui do Canada em 2024!
Your videos are amazing and you explain things with passion, you want to make sure that we understand the topic, I really appriciate a lot this videos, a huge "thank you!" for sharing your knowledge
Great training, very precise and right on point, thanks for sharing. I have already registered for your upcoming course. I am an avid learner and I always look forward to learning new information.
Olá, eu não estou encontrando mais o último e-mail que você me mandou, desculpe. Mas a sua configuração do Proxy-ID tem que ser feita com os endereços já traduzidos (endereços externos de NAT). As redes que você entra na configuração do Proxy-ID são as que vão ser "vistas" no túnel. A tradução do NAT já foi feita. Eu imagino que essa foi sua pergunta, certo? Eu estou planejando um vídeo sobre S2S baseado em política, só não sei quando vai ficar pronto. Qualquer coisa pode me escrever de novo. Abraços.
Really good explanation about the VPN configuration, please make the other video for Policy based VPN too or if you have already made it, please share me the link of that.
@netsum , got 2 things to discuss, I was able to bring up tunnel between 2 Palo-Alto Firewalls without any Ipsec rule, just added specific rule for interesting(inside) subnet, any specific reason for adding it? 2nd thing, you've not used tunnel interface Ip anywhere, so I've tested without tunnel interface IP and it worked fine. I think we need tunnel interface ip only when we use dynamic routing protocol. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Q1) I think the intra zone (OUTSIDE to OUTSIDE) traffic is allowed in PA firewalls by default. Q2) My understanding too same. IP on the tunnels needed for dynamic routing protocols.
Hi @jaydipparmar5653. In my lab I changed the default intrazone rule from allow to deny (override using Panorama). I personally prefer it like this, I have more control on what's going through the firewall. But in a default configuration, you wouldn't need the IPSec rules, you're right. And yes, if you're using dynamic routing, you need the IP address on the tunnel. Another application would be if you have multiple tunnels and you want to monitor the tunnel availabilities (path monitoring). In this case, I would also suggest to add IP addresses to the tunnel interfaces and use the interface from one tunnel side to monitor the IP address on the other side.
Hi thank for your video very helpful as I trying to configure for the first time. S2S with Palo By the way I think there is some misteake or confusion during your explaination with your diagram. For example when you are configuring Ike GW you are in PA-VM ( as you said in the beginning) But show the other side (PA-440) ?? Other thing your PA-VM has inside and outside interface 1/1. ? Thanks
@@netsumsone question, why configuring ip adresse for the tunnel, as this is only needed if you are using dynamic routing according to Palo documentation? Thanks
IP addresses for the tunnel interfaces are also required if you want to enable tunnel monitoring. I don't remember anymore if I configured tunnel monitoring in this video. But if not, you're right, the IP addresses would be optional.
With OSPF you need an IP address for the tunnel interface. docs.paloaltonetworks.com/network-security/ipsec-vpn/administration/site-to-site-vpn-quick-configs/site-to-site-vpn-with-ospf
hello I am using path monitoring on numbered Tunnels -- one firewall shows the path monitor up -- the second firewall shows the path monitor up -- have you come across this before ?
Hi, I'm not sure I understand your question. If both firewalls are showing the path monitor up, than it's all good, right? :-) Or do you mean one of the firewalls is showing the path monitor down? In this case you should make sure that ping is allowed on both sides (in the tunnel management profile would be the first place I would look)? You could try using the CLI to ping the other side using the option to enter a source interface to test if both sides are answering to ping.
thank you -- I have ping enabled both sides using the management profile and security policy config-- I ran a packet capture on both firewalls -firewall #2 has an address x.x.x.2 -firewall #1 has an address x.x.x.1-the traces show .1 ping & .2 reply -- > this explains why one path monitor probe is up- the capture shows the ping request from .2 is not responded toby .1 @@netsums
At this stage of the setup of the vpn connection, there is still no ipsec tunnel, and the gateways need to exchange their security information over the Internet. The only way for a gateway to reach your firewall over the internet would be though the outside zone. I hope I could make myself understandable. :)
@@netsums Hello Where do you think we can get a pal alto trial license from? ive tried cdw in the past and you never get anything from them palo related even if you make the order, so where else do you think we can get a license to lab on eve-ng? i already have the pa-vm image,
FREE Palo Alto Cheat Sheet in different formats and further FREE resources: netsums.com/resources
I just found you on Internet. This video is amazing!. Your didactic is superb!
Ricardo! Eu sabia que seu sotaque em Ingles era do Brasil! Muito bom canal! Estou comecando com Palo-Alto e seus videos ajudarao muito. Abracos aqui do Canada em 2024!
Hahaha. Pois é, o sotaque me entrega. :-) grande abraço, fico feliz que os vídeos podem te ajudar!
Excellent video my friend. Keep up the good work.
Thank you for the comment, I'm glad you liked it. :)
Palo Alto Firewall Basic introduction about in GUI
ruclips.net/video/5zzW87-VbhE/видео.html
Your videos are amazing and you explain things with passion, you want to make sure that we understand the topic, I really appriciate a lot this videos, a huge "thank you!" for sharing your knowledge
Thank you for your lovely comment, I'm happy you get some value from the videos. :-)
Great training, very precise and right on point, thanks for sharing. I have already registered for your upcoming course. I am an avid learner and I always look forward to learning new information.
Thank you for your comment, glad to be able to help!
You are very welcome!
Excelente aula, parabéns!
Na expectativa pelo vídeo de VPN site to site baseada em politica e usando NAT!
Olá, eu não estou encontrando mais o último e-mail que você me mandou, desculpe. Mas a sua configuração do Proxy-ID tem que ser feita com os endereços já traduzidos (endereços externos de NAT). As redes que você entra na configuração do Proxy-ID são as que vão ser "vistas" no túnel. A tradução do NAT já foi feita. Eu imagino que essa foi sua pergunta, certo? Eu estou planejando um vídeo sobre S2S baseado em política, só não sei quando vai ficar pronto. Qualquer coisa pode me escrever de novo. Abraços.
Isso mesmo, muito obrigado!@@netsums
Really good explanation about the VPN configuration, please make the other video for Policy based VPN too or if you have already made it, please share me the link of that.
Tha k you for the comment. Here the link for the policy-based VPN video: ruclips.net/video/LeJVUjRCzKo/видео.html
Hi, Great video.
You should do also based on policies.
Greetings from mexico.
¡Hola! Thanks, I'll keep it in mind for the upcoming videos. :-)
@netsum , got 2 things to discuss, I was able to bring up tunnel between 2 Palo-Alto Firewalls without any Ipsec rule, just added specific rule for interesting(inside) subnet, any specific reason for adding it? 2nd thing, you've not used tunnel interface Ip anywhere, so I've tested without tunnel interface IP and it worked fine. I think we need tunnel interface ip only when we use dynamic routing protocol. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Q1) I think the intra zone (OUTSIDE to OUTSIDE) traffic is allowed in PA firewalls by default.
Q2) My understanding too same. IP on the tunnels needed for dynamic routing protocols.
Hi @jaydipparmar5653. In my lab I changed the default intrazone rule from allow to deny (override using Panorama). I personally prefer it like this, I have more control on what's going through the firewall. But in a default configuration, you wouldn't need the IPSec rules, you're right.
And yes, if you're using dynamic routing, you need the IP address on the tunnel. Another application would be if you have multiple tunnels and you want to monitor the tunnel availabilities (path monitoring). In this case, I would also suggest to add IP addresses to the tunnel interfaces and use the interface from one tunnel side to monitor the IP address on the other side.
Hello Thank you for tutorial, Currently i have tunnel for GlobalProtect. Should we create separate tunnel for Site to Site VPN?
Hi. I would always create separate tunnels for GlobalProtect and Site-2-Site. I don't see any reason why not to do it. :)
Hi thank for your video very helpful as I trying to configure for the first time. S2S with Palo
By the way I think there is some misteake or confusion during your explaination with your diagram.
For example when you are configuring Ike GW you are in PA-VM ( as you said in the beginning)
But show the other side (PA-440) ??
Other thing your PA-VM has inside and outside interface 1/1. ?
Thanks
Ops, so I guess there are some mistakes in the video. I haven't noticed it, I need to watch it again, then. 😊 But I'm glad I still could help.
@@netsumsone question, why configuring ip adresse for the tunnel, as this is only needed if you are using dynamic routing according to Palo documentation?
Thanks
IP addresses for the tunnel interfaces are also required if you want to enable tunnel monitoring. I don't remember anymore if I configured tunnel monitoring in this video. But if not, you're right, the IP addresses would be optional.
Hi,
How we can use the OSPF model instead of static routes?
With OSPF you need an IP address for the tunnel interface. docs.paloaltonetworks.com/network-security/ipsec-vpn/administration/site-to-site-vpn-quick-configs/site-to-site-vpn-with-ospf
hello I am using path monitoring on numbered Tunnels -- one firewall shows the path monitor up -- the second firewall shows the path monitor up -- have you come across this before ?
Hi, I'm not sure I understand your question. If both firewalls are showing the path monitor up, than it's all good, right? :-) Or do you mean one of the firewalls is showing the path monitor down? In this case you should make sure that ping is allowed on both sides (in the tunnel management profile would be the first place I would look)?
You could try using the CLI to ping the other side using the option to enter a source interface to test if both sides are answering to ping.
thank you -- I have ping enabled both sides using the management profile and security policy config-- I ran a packet capture on both firewalls -firewall #2 has an address x.x.x.2 -firewall #1 has an address x.x.x.1-the traces show .1 ping & .2 reply -- > this explains why one path monitor probe is up-
the capture shows the ping request from .2 is not responded toby .1 @@netsums
why in the rule the source and destination zone is outside you selected ? it should be VPN-S2S and Inside right ????
Can you please give me the timestamp? I will take a look
@@netsums 16:44 source zone
At this stage of the setup of the vpn connection, there is still no ipsec tunnel, and the gateways need to exchange their security information over the Internet. The only way for a gateway to reach your firewall over the internet would be though the outside zone. I hope I could make myself understandable. :)
Awesome vid!
Thanks, I'm glad you liked it
Can we have a video doing s2s VPN between Palo and FTD firepower?
Hi. I unfortunately don't have access to a Firepower in my lab.
@@netsums Hello Where do you think we can get a pal alto trial license from? ive tried cdw in the past and you never get anything from them palo related even if you make the order, so where else do you think we can get a license to lab on eve-ng? i already have the pa-vm image,
what is the config on the router
It has the simplest configuration you can imagine. It doesn't know any networks expect the locally connected ones.