some info. ISSUES ISSUES ISSUES it can be seen that the use of an OFFSET thrust configuration Requires certain Compromises. as seen at linked photo, to the extent practical, the thrust Line Should Intersect the c-m. center of mass. thus, the powerplant is POORLY located. views of the wing in a previous video suggest that the wing has NOT been, optimally, designed. specifically, the wing SHOULD have a flat-bottomed profile that Precisely resembles a clark-y (v1) profile. this is true, in part, because this is aircraft flies in the low-reynolds number zone. googletranslate static.rcgroups.net/forums/attachments/2/9/6/3/9/7/a5988257-224-bixler%202%20motor%20angle%20correction.jpg en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clark_Y_airfoil 1.bp.blogspot.com/-5C8vhlmhBOk/VRe3o3Jt3yI/AAAAAAAABrI/EEgVHXkLvbY/s1600/clark%2By.gif static.rcgroups.net/forums/attachments/4/7/3/8/5/a620936-2-Clark%20Y.jpg airfoiltools.com/calculator/reynoldsnumber
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
Nice! You built the whole aircraft?
Yes. From scratch.
Engine power hp ?
some info. ISSUES ISSUES ISSUES it can be seen that the use of an OFFSET thrust configuration Requires certain Compromises. as seen at linked photo, to the extent practical, the thrust Line Should Intersect the c-m. center of mass. thus, the powerplant is POORLY located. views of the wing in a previous video suggest that the wing has NOT been, optimally, designed. specifically, the wing SHOULD have a flat-bottomed profile that Precisely resembles a clark-y (v1) profile. this is true, in part, because this is aircraft flies in the low-reynolds number zone. googletranslate
static.rcgroups.net/forums/attachments/2/9/6/3/9/7/a5988257-224-bixler%202%20motor%20angle%20correction.jpg
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clark_Y_airfoil
1.bp.blogspot.com/-5C8vhlmhBOk/VRe3o3Jt3yI/AAAAAAAABrI/EEgVHXkLvbY/s1600/clark%2By.gif
static.rcgroups.net/forums/attachments/4/7/3/8/5/a620936-2-Clark%20Y.jpg
airfoiltools.com/calculator/reynoldsnumber