I think both have there purpose for different situations, I have both and use the 14-30 when I want to use filters and pack small and the 14-24 when I'm in low light situations. both have similar weight so it's more about using the right tool for the right moment. both are amazing.
James, thank you for this excellent comparison, and BTW, your images are gorgeous! As a landscape, wildlife and product photographer, I shoot the Z7 and Z8 with the NIkkor Z 14-30 f/4 S lens, among others. I find that lens to be quite sharp, especially in the center and at f/8-f/11. I shoot generally at the hyperfocal distance and on a solid Leofoto tripod, using a 10-second delay, for optimum sharpness. I also shoot vertical panoramas with this setup on an RRS Nodal Rail to eliminate parallax. So, you feel that the 14-24 f/2.8 NIkkor Z lens is even sharper than the 14-30? Is that sharpness difference mainly noticeable off-center, or would it be noticeable in the image center as well? Thanks again.
Hi, thanks for the open, honest review. I too was torn between the f2.8 and f4 but also like some astro/milky-way shooting. I considered the f4 plus a fast wide prime so can get shots without the star tracker. The price of two lenses is the same or more so the f2.8 is better value, gives cleaner city, low light and landscape shits and can do some astro-landscape stuff with goid corners. So it's the best choice and value for me. Iis expensive though. t
I think both have there purpose for different situations, I have both and use the 14-30 when I want to use filters and pack small and the 14-24 when I'm in low light situations. both have similar weight so it's more about using the right tool for the right moment. both are amazing.
Thanks for your comment
Thanks for the video. Well done!
My pleasure
这一期算是从国内转向国际的风向标了
其实一直想努力，想找到一个合适的方法，因为正确的叙述比口语瞎说还是难太多了。
总之希望起码能让人听懂吧
@@JamesZhenYu 其实真正受欢迎的未必就是非常客观公允的，看看DPReview的订阅，跟很多看上去满嘴跑火车的差距很大，也许有点儿个性也挺好的，哈哈哈，我就胡说八道，别当真
我这个年纪已经不太可能太有个性了，能有人看我就很开心了
Very informative, thanks.
Can you tell me where to get that adapter for the kase rectangular filters ? And is there any vignette with that system since it's only 100mm ?
James, thank you for this excellent comparison, and BTW, your images are gorgeous! As a landscape, wildlife and product photographer, I shoot the Z7 and Z8 with the NIkkor Z 14-30 f/4 S lens, among others. I find that lens to be quite sharp, especially in the center and at f/8-f/11. I shoot generally at the hyperfocal distance and on a solid Leofoto tripod, using a 10-second delay, for optimum sharpness. I also shoot vertical panoramas with this setup on an RRS Nodal Rail to eliminate parallax. So, you feel that the 14-24 f/2.8 NIkkor Z lens is even sharper than the 14-30? Is that sharpness difference mainly noticeable off-center, or would it be noticeable in the image center as well? Thanks again.
尼康用户会感激你的请问是否可否出一期介绍Nikon Z14-24 f2.8 的滤镜搭配分享和建议？用z14-24拍摄星河的sharing 感谢！！
之后有时间来做，现欠的内容太多了
我想問一下，尼康的現在剩85.8和40f2，24-70f4賣了，想買14-30f4，另1個在24-120f4和24-200f4-6.3猶豫着，主要是我人像,街拍,旅遊風景都會拍到，這2個鏡頭應該選哪個？
是否搭配英文標題會比較容易接觸到英文受眾?
你如果是英文界面应该显示的是英文标题的
@@wilsonglenelg4796 感謝回答~
你看到的是繁体的标题吧，我做了英文，简体和繁体中文三种标题和字幕
@@JamesZhenYu 我剛打開字幕居然選了英文在看XD
好奇問一下！
假設，你的sigma14f1.8是跟Sony那顆14f1.8gm那顆的輕便
同時拍銀河星空時沒在使用星野儀
你會選擇留14-30f4+14f1.8嗎@@？
sigma是健身头，很重的东西
应该还是1424很方便，我当时的选择是1424没有的关系
Great! I like your English!
Thanks I try my best
14-24 f2.8 will be first z mount, I save this landscape spot for the z by not getting any more f mount.
开始关注你的频道啦，还没有z，只有810+蔡司milvus15f2.8拍风光，Z72转接15/2.8会不会是个好的组合？毕竟蔡司只需要95mm的滤镜
w为什么不考虑 z1424 f2.8 既然换了 Z
@@JamesZhenYu 我最后是下单了Z62带2470F4的套机，如果买了Z72就没钱买镜头了，说来说去都是因为没有钱。。。。。
你好.會評測Z28 75 2.8 嗎？謝謝,🙏
暂时还没有这支镜头啊 ，现在尼康的镜头都是买的或者朋友借的
@@JamesZhenYu 的
明白👌👌🙏
请问是否可以出一期介绍尼康Z14-24 f2.8的滤镜搭配分享和建议？感谢！！
可以的
我是很心水14-24mm的，但是因为滤镜的关系，所以选择了14-30mm配20mm f1.8
我的14-24配了转接环，使用kase 100mm的方镜，使用体验还可以，就是不能用偏振，得专门陪偏振有点烦
你用铠甲大师就可以了，这样比两个镜头加起来并不贵了
@@张大爷-u7c 卡色出了，可以cpl加ND或者GND
@@stevenma2559 你说的是90mm cpl的那个k9吗？我昨天也看了一下，发现cpl变成带磁吸的90mm有点惊喜，但也不确定能不能用！因为我记得我的k9是82mm的cpl...
K9不算太完美配上1424主要是14端，
做一个Z14-24拍摄星河的视频，尼康用户会感激你的！
会有机会
Hi, thanks for the open, honest review. I too was torn between the f2.8 and f4 but also like some astro/milky-way shooting. I considered the f4 plus a fast wide prime so can get shots without the star tracker. The price of two lenses is the same or more so the f2.8 is better value, gives cleaner city, low light and landscape shits and can do some astro-landscape stuff with goid corners. So it's the best choice and value for me. Iis expensive though. t
James当初为何去阿德莱德，该来悉尼啊！你的视频都是干活，说的也都很实在。我们可以喝咖啡聊聊天。我会报你的团。悉尼有一个顾俊，但看他的视频只是为了好玩。
房子便宜，人少，安静
问题是咱听不懂英文。😅
有中文字幕，目前计划每月出一支英文视频，主要在器材评测内容
我买了z24-120, 白天可以，晚上就不行了
是的
I can follow you to improve my English. Please you can use English for your channel.
My pleasure
Good try, cheer up!
Thanks
加油 hahaha、
Fighting
国内外通吃了
不求通吃，只求自己有所突破