yeah im a 'professional' gambler and yes the parlay betting system can be very powerful ... why? because it's a fractal way of betting... a lot of people know fractals, right? f.e. you start with 1 dollar, you win, you parlay it or play with 2 dollar, you win...so you've won 3 dollar , so to break-even you can try this 4 times starting with 1 dollar and trying to get a win+parlay win, to break-even you only need 1 winning (win+parlay win) out of the 4 tries...some people think oh I've lost 3 dollar, no you didn't, you lost only 1 dollar and can make a recover move to get the 1 dollar back if the parlay win goal didn't hit..you were playing with casino money...uc , so this is powerful
There are many components to how to win sports bets. One place I discovered that successfully combines these is the Magic matcher tactic (check it out on google) definately the most helpful system that I have ever heard of.Check out the super info .
This is similar to the show bet system for horse racing where you keep betting your winnings until you lose. So if you hit a whole race card of show bets, which could be 13 races, you can cash out big time. But if you lose, you only lose $2, if you bet the minimum show bet.
negative progression = gamblers mentality at all gambler's costs positive progression = use casino money and costs to bet against their own, if used correctly with bet sizing strategy = all you can eat gambling the casino is paying you to play against themselves
That actually makes a lot of sense. I would eventually like to become a professional card counter in blackjack but for the time being, I'll try this out along with the basic strategy system I've learned
My advice to all is to simulate 10,000 hands of any betting system to seek your own answers and log your winnings every 25 hands. You'll see the trends.
Use progression method...use Fibonacci numbers. Start over when you win....great for controlling loses....oh and keep a count always while playing 3 hands at the same time...the only way to play
(in an imaginary game with 50/50 odds.) with a positive progression system, lets say you're shooting for a 3 win perolli. you have a 1/8 chance of completing the streak. (12.5%) using binomial distribution over 3 attempts with a fixed probability of 50%, a martingale system would hit AT LEAST once 87.5% of the time. Any good math guys out there can see that $100 with 12.5 ways to win $7(assuming you bet 1-2-4) with 87.5 ways to lose $1 is EXACTLY THE SAME as 87.5 ways to win $1 and 12.5 ways to lose $7. THE PROOF IS IN THE MATH. POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE PROGRESSION SYSTEMS ARE EQUALLY EFFECTIVE.
Many thanks, been searching for "martingale betting system blackjack" for a while now, and I think this has helped. You ever tried - Ameliaten Bankify Bigshot - (should be on google have a look ) ? Ive heard some decent things about it and my brother in law got great results with it.
Cheers for this, I been tryin to find out about "double up betting strategy" for a while now, and I think this has helped. Have you heard people talk about - Ameliaten Bankify Bigshot - (just google it ) ? Ive heard some great things about it and my co-worker got amazing success with it.
I just ran an Excel Simulation for this method for 50 simulations composed of 10,000 roulette wheel spins each. Betting on Red where my betting intervals were 10, 20, and 40. I started out with 200. At no point did my profits exceed 100. And at no point beyond 75 spins did I see this profit margin. You lose every single time. I've also tried playing with different unit bets (20, 40, 80), (10, 20, 40, 80, 160), and literally any combination of betting intervals along with starting cash and I lost it all (plus much more) on average after the 50th spin. If you're going to make money, it's going to be less than 100 and its going to happen within the first 30 spins (Still a 50/50 chance of not tanking). I've also done this with the negative progression as well and the only difference is that negative progression you end up about 15k in the hole after a few thousand spins and with this you end up about 7.5k in the hole.
I totally agree with you bro, playing outside bets ends up in losing most of the time in long run, any system with negative progression too. Best strategy is the one that's focused on straight ups and splits with preferably no or very mild progression, your losses are in control and your winnings will pay off decent profit to recover losses, I was winning playing dozens/columns for a couple of times but it failed me on my last try badly
yes, that's why I always say ... a Parlay you ONLY can use now and then and really as some kind of pure gamble behavior ... when you win, fine, when not, don't go all the way, just a bit of loss , but not more, a parlay on its own won't let you win... it's not a system that works on its own.. it's just some kind of bonus, ABOVE your system that do work... I agree on its own it can not stand the test.. the problem with roulette is this ... whatever system you will use, one day it will face a (very) cold session.. the point then is you need a stop loss ... roulette without stop loss is exactly the same as 100% loosing ... it's VERY hard, and very bad for the morals to f.e. win every day 25 dollar for 5 days and loose in one day f.e. 75 dollar ... you were standing at 125 dollar profit and now 50 , but it's still a profit, if you can't accept that the profit equation goes like this (like most gamblers can't accept), you for sure won't win, I guarantee people one day their total bankrol will be gone, over and over again !! so you will have a relapse /reversal (or what's the proper english word?) ... as long you consider this as abnormal, you never will win at the long term...
beneath i already explained a bit the intrinsic characteristics of parlay betting.. it's a matrix/fractal betting system..which works in two dimensions... the first dimension is the which i call the vertical dimension= the amount of parlay winnings ... the horizontal dimension is every try ... when you have 1 win+1 parlay winning (=the vertical dimension) to break even you can try this four times (horizontal dimension) if one out of the four is ok, you're safe and you break even... 1win + 1 parlay winning= total profit 3 , so to break even it's ok to loose all other 3 tries ... 1 win+ 2 parlay winnings = total profit 7, so to break even it's ok to loose all other 6 tries ... 1 win + 3 parlay winnings = total profit 15, to break even it's ok to loose all other 14 tries ... and so on ... i explain the latter with the worse case scenario you only win the last try ... 1 win ok, 1 parlay win=loose , you lost 1 dollar, you try again, the second attempt => 1 win ok, 1 parlay win= loose , you lost 1 dollar, or total 2 dollar, you can go for the third try , 1 win ok, parlay win= loose, you lost 1 dollar, or total 3 ...and so on , now the last attempt : 1 win, ok, 1 parlay win, ok, 2nd parlay win ok, 3th parlay win, ok, 4th parlay win, ok ... you've won 15 dollar and totally recovered from the previous attempts... of course you want to win ... so the ratio of successful attempts versus loosing starting attempts needs to be right for you to profit...but when you win ... this is the fractal idea ... again a series of a matrix paroli betting starts.. so suppose you would get 2 winnings ... with the latter explained is twice a 15 dollar profit ... every winning creates a whole new bunch of NEW tries/attempts ... this is a fractal !!!!! like this we get a list with percentages you need to hit for you to at least break even ... in the case of the latter you need 1 out of the total 15 tries, a 0,066666 ratio, or with other words , theoretically you break even already with a 93,333% chance..why it's a fractal? because suppose you win the first attempt=15 dollar profit , well actually you could stop and profit, but suppose in the future you would have tried 14 times more and loose, at this point you would break even, but to profit really on these 15 tries attempt series you needed to go for a second winning of 15 dollar, but when you hit this second attempt within less than 15 attempts , you can split these winnings into two series now, for each to profit you need a second winning out of THEIR total 15 tries...and this goes on and on
As a trader, I consistently see the same delusional belief in my field that, somehow, some 'clever' money management strategy can substitute itself for a statistical edge. Utter nonsense. No amount of money management/betting progression scheme will ever compensate a game where the profit expectancy (not just the odds) is against you.
You right that makes a lot of fuken seances, however, first I don't know if you are a stock or currency trader those tradings also involve substantial risk as well. So since both games involve risk, what is your issue with managing your money and minimizing your losses?
like a martingale. but instead, bet a third of the total losses+half the original bet and let it ride once to save shit tons of money.Martingale is just crazy expensive.
it is expensive, and why would you pay the casino at betting, i will never use martingale, i would rather not use any of my money to bet at all, this is why i use paroli
But if you don’t hit your full sequence you win 0 and still rack up losses. You should make a positive progession if you win and a negative progression if you lose. As long as you have a decent size bank roll and even odds you will be able to 0 out your losses
@theironmanx428 Cheers for this, I been tryin to find out about "is arbitrage betting legal?" for a while now, and I think this has helped. Ever heard of - Meyackentae Foundational Magic - (Have a quick look on google cant remember the place now )? It is a smashing one off guide for discovering how to use this method to finally win at betting minus the headache. Ive heard some great things about it and my cousin got excellent success with it.
Winner of a video, I been tryin to find out about "betting strategies blackjack" for a while now, and I think this has helped. Have you ever come across - Meyackentae Foundational Magic - (do a google search )? It is a good exclusive product for discovering how to use this method to finally win at betting without the headache. Ive heard some amazing things about it and my friend got excellent success with it.
i don't get the reason why people stops at a 3 win sequence or using a Fibonacci sequence. i mean every bet is a mutually exclusive event and consecutive wins do happen to have low possibility but shouldnt be overlooked. but i do skip random games from time to time. the paroli system is just exponentially expensive for the casino it offsets any player bet especially they start at minimums and returns to a minimum once a loss happens
Ive been rocking the negative progression system and came up 5k in 5 days i bet big af after i lose so idk how this one will work and after i win a 500 doller bet i go back to table min am i doing it rigjt or na?
negative progression is nothing compared to the positive progression. especially when u know how to do bet sizing. i can do 250k easily with minimum bets which is only around 200 at the casino that i play at, get casino's expense to pay for the plays in the long run, which means having them to pay for me to play. with a negative progression you pay for everything
Its win 35 in the end.. IMO its really stupid to count also the wins which you are going to bet right away 100-5 bet 95+10 win 105-10 bet 95+20 win 115-20 bet 95+40 win 135
I am pretty sure that a few years back I saw a video where guy was betting his own money showcasing this system, he was covering up his login name and stuff, but still might be fake.. On the other hand, when seeing someone making video on a martingale strategy and using his own money is like seeing an unicorn or real santa claus guaranteed :D
If that was true they would make a video saying to go for a martingale telling you have red or black doesnt come up more than a few times in a row, that would be a video made by a casino.. In this case they talk about positive system which is called positive for a reason, and if so that its really made by a casino after all then thats one nice casino who dont want you to lose in a matter of minutes but in a matter of hours or days, work either way :D
hi guys, the best success that I have had was by following the Magic Matcher Tactic (just google it) definately the best remedy that I have ever followed.
negative progression = gamblers mentality at all gambler's costs positive progression = use casino money and costs to bet against their own, if used correctly with bet sizing strategy = all you can eat gambling the casino is paying you to play against themselves
Progressive bets or martingales work if the win percentage is greater than 50%. Duh. Otherwise it is a way to big losses. You need to play a game where you can get an advantage. But where? Wrong question. Not where, but with whom? Woof.
See?! Now this makes sense. The Martingale System & others like it, Should be called the “Losers’ Chase System”. But someday, when I feel flush or lucky, I’m going to play like my husband thinks Blackjack should be played. If the House has the edge, why not play like the House? And that includes hitting on Soft or even Hard 17s, regardless what the Dealer’s up card is. I’m old enough to remember when single decks to be a norm. Today you’re “lucky” if you find anything less than 6 decks. Common sense should dictate, there are lots of small cards coming out, if you’ve seen lots of face cards. So why NOT hit a hard 17? I’d like to do this some time when dealers show high cards. Wanna bet I’d win? 😆 Without having to card count, and if we’re playing for FUN, using the standard systems we all know, can get boring. Of course I don’t play too get rich so I’m willing to lose as long as I’m having FUN!
There are many factors in sports picks. One resource I found that successfully combines these is the Magic Matcher Tactic (check it out on google) without a doubt the most useful system i've heard of.Look at all the incredible information .
just tried this paroli system with free money and it fking sucks man biggest waste of cash ever just do the martingale on the 3 dozens it pays you 3 times 1 dollar so do 2 times on a dozen then increase with 1 unit so 2 dollar you make 6
Martingale is dangerous. I'm serious. I've tried it. My stamina for Martingale is an absolute. I started off with $1. I have 11 lives. I died. Do not use Martingale.
This is just superb, I have been researching "blackjack betting online" for a while now, and I think this has helped. Ever heard of - Ameliaten Bankify Bigshot - (search on google ) ? Ive heard some interesting things about it and my buddy got excellent results with it.
yeah im a 'professional' gambler and yes the parlay betting system can be very powerful ... why? because it's a fractal way of betting... a lot of people know fractals, right? f.e. you start with 1 dollar, you win, you parlay it or play with 2 dollar, you win...so you've won 3 dollar , so to break-even you can try this 4 times starting with 1 dollar and trying to get a win+parlay win, to break-even you only need 1 winning (win+parlay win) out of the 4 tries...some people think oh I've lost 3 dollar, no you didn't, you lost only 1 dollar and can make a recover move to get the 1 dollar back if the parlay win goal didn't hit..you were playing with casino money...uc , so this is powerful
+PetStuBa Good Stuff!
There are many components to how to win sports bets. One place I discovered that successfully combines these is the Magic matcher tactic (check it out on google) definately the most helpful system that I have ever heard of.Check out the super info .
I have spent months studying how to win sports bets and found a great resource at Magic matcher tactic (google it if you are interested)
I play negative progression too , its just one of many tools . Works nice on the field and only find craps games where field pays 3to1 on 12 .
PetStuBa
You really need to study statistics
This is similar to the show bet system for horse racing where you keep betting your winnings until you lose. So if you hit a whole race card of show bets, which could be 13 races, you can cash out big time. But if you lose, you only lose $2, if you bet the minimum show bet.
negative progression = gamblers mentality at all gambler's costs
positive progression = use casino money and costs to bet against their own, if used correctly with bet sizing strategy = all you can eat gambling the casino is paying you to play against themselves
That actually makes a lot of sense. I would eventually like to become a professional card counter in blackjack but for the time being, I'll try this out along with the basic strategy system I've learned
these strategy works best only when the odds are fairly even, i.e. it works great on baccarat
How did it go
You need to have a big bank roll and be willing to lose some of it. You cannot guarantee a win but this system on red and black is helpful
My advice to all is to simulate 10,000 hands of any betting system to seek your own answers and log your winnings every 25 hands. You'll see the trends.
Couldnt agree more. I logged my own win loss patterns over about 10,000 results and created a betting strategy around my results.
What software do you use to simulate 10000 hands?
Could anyone provide me the trends? Please, eltontodelpueblo777@gmail.com.
TY!
Use progression method...use Fibonacci numbers. Start over when you win....great for controlling loses....oh and keep a count always while playing 3 hands at the same time...the only way to play
(in an imaginary game with 50/50 odds.)
with a positive progression system, lets say you're shooting for a 3 win perolli. you have a 1/8 chance of completing the streak. (12.5%)
using binomial distribution over 3 attempts with a fixed probability of 50%, a martingale system would hit AT LEAST once 87.5% of the time.
Any good math guys out there can see that $100 with 12.5 ways to win $7(assuming you bet 1-2-4) with 87.5 ways to lose $1 is
EXACTLY THE SAME as 87.5 ways to win $1 and 12.5 ways to lose $7.
THE PROOF IS IN THE MATH.
POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE PROGRESSION SYSTEMS ARE EQUALLY EFFECTIVE.
I've been studying how to win sports bets and discovered a great resource at Magic matcher tactic (google it if you're interested)
Many thanks, been searching for "martingale betting system blackjack" for a while now, and I think this has helped. You ever tried - Ameliaten Bankify Bigshot - (should be on google have a look ) ? Ive heard some decent things about it and my brother in law got great results with it.
Cheers for this, I been tryin to find out about "double up betting strategy" for a while now, and I think this has helped. Have you heard people talk about - Ameliaten Bankify Bigshot - (just google it ) ? Ive heard some great things about it and my co-worker got amazing success with it.
I just ran an Excel Simulation for this method for 50 simulations composed of 10,000 roulette wheel spins each.
Betting on Red where my betting intervals were 10, 20, and 40. I started out with 200. At no point did my profits exceed 100. And at no point beyond 75 spins did I see this profit margin. You lose every single time. I've also tried playing with different unit bets (20, 40, 80), (10, 20, 40, 80, 160), and literally any combination of betting intervals along with starting cash and I lost it all (plus much more) on average after the 50th spin. If you're going to make money, it's going to be less than 100 and its going to happen within the first 30 spins (Still a 50/50 chance of not tanking).
I've also done this with the negative progression as well and the only difference is that negative progression you end up about 15k in the hole after a few thousand spins and with this you end up about 7.5k in the hole.
I totally agree with you bro, playing outside bets ends up in losing most of the time in long run, any system with negative progression too. Best strategy is the one that's focused on straight ups and splits with preferably no or very mild progression, your losses are in control and your winnings will pay off decent profit to recover losses, I was winning playing dozens/columns for a couple of times but it failed me on my last try badly
yes, that's why I always say ... a Parlay you ONLY can use now and then and really as some kind of pure gamble behavior ... when you win, fine, when not, don't go all the way, just a bit of loss , but not more, a parlay on its own won't let you win... it's not a system that works on its own.. it's just some kind of bonus, ABOVE your system that do work... I agree on its own it can not stand the test.. the problem with roulette is this ... whatever system you will use, one day it will face a (very) cold session.. the point then is you need a stop loss ... roulette without stop loss is exactly the same as 100% loosing ... it's VERY hard, and very bad for the morals to f.e. win every day 25 dollar for 5 days and loose in one day f.e. 75 dollar ... you were standing at 125 dollar profit and now 50 , but it's still a profit, if you can't accept that the profit equation goes like this (like most gamblers can't accept), you for sure won't win, I guarantee people one day their total bankrol will be gone, over and over again !! so you will have a relapse /reversal (or what's the proper english word?) ... as long you consider this as abnormal, you never will win at the long term...
beneath i already explained a bit the intrinsic characteristics of parlay betting.. it's a matrix/fractal betting system..which works in two dimensions... the first dimension is the which i call the vertical dimension= the amount of parlay winnings ... the horizontal dimension is every try ... when you have 1 win+1 parlay winning (=the vertical dimension) to break even you can try this four times (horizontal dimension) if one out of the four is ok, you're safe and you break even... 1win + 1 parlay winning= total profit 3 , so to break even it's ok to loose all other 3 tries ... 1 win+ 2 parlay winnings = total profit 7, so to break even it's ok to loose all other 6 tries ... 1 win + 3 parlay winnings = total profit 15, to break even it's ok to loose all other 14 tries ... and so on ... i explain the latter with the worse case scenario you only win the last try ... 1 win ok, 1 parlay win=loose , you lost 1 dollar, you try again, the second attempt => 1 win ok, 1 parlay win= loose , you lost 1 dollar, or total 2 dollar, you can go for the third try , 1 win ok, parlay win= loose, you lost 1 dollar, or total 3 ...and so on , now the last attempt : 1 win, ok, 1 parlay win, ok, 2nd parlay win ok, 3th parlay win, ok, 4th parlay win, ok ... you've won 15 dollar and totally recovered from the previous attempts... of course you want to win ... so the ratio of successful attempts versus loosing starting attempts needs to be right for you to profit...but when you win ... this is the fractal idea ... again a series of a matrix paroli betting starts.. so suppose you would get 2 winnings ... with the latter explained is twice a 15 dollar profit ... every winning creates a whole new bunch of NEW tries/attempts ... this is a fractal !!!!! like this we get a list with percentages you need to hit for you to at least break even ... in the case of the latter you need 1 out of the total 15 tries, a 0,066666 ratio, or with other words , theoretically you break even already with a 93,333% chance..why it's a fractal? because suppose you win the first attempt=15 dollar profit , well actually you could stop and profit, but suppose in the future you would have tried 14 times more and loose, at this point you would break even, but to profit really on these 15 tries attempt series you needed to go for a second winning of 15 dollar, but when you hit this second attempt within less than 15 attempts , you can split these winnings into two series now, for each to profit you need a second winning out of THEIR total 15 tries...and this goes on and on
What if i lose bet in 2 unit
What if this keeps happen one round wins second round loses
make a negative progression system that calls for you to make a 'perolli' in order to make up the losses and you have yourself a system worth using.
As a trader, I consistently see the same delusional belief in my field that, somehow, some 'clever' money management strategy can substitute itself for a statistical edge. Utter nonsense. No amount of money management/betting progression scheme will ever compensate a game where the profit expectancy (not just the odds) is against you.
You right that makes a lot of fuken seances, however, first I don't know if you are a stock or currency trader those tradings also involve substantial risk as well. So since both games involve risk, what is your issue with managing your money and minimizing your losses?
Damn those is some sweet lightning and shooting. Damn good job at that!
+obiwanfisher537 Thank you!
The fairest bet in my notebook right now is the 4+10 place bets.
EXACTLY 50% chance of winning.
6 ways to win 9 units.
6 ways to lose 10 units.
SlickChukklez what’s that
As stated, betting system changes nothing, except how quick or slow you will lose.
you are deceived bro
no, at the most fundamental levels the expense from the banker and the player is totally opposite between negative and positive progressions
@@royhsieh4307 whatever. But you can never predict the outcome of the next bet.
1,3,2,6 positive progression I use.
Units?, please explain, and do u just repeat. What's the total wager per roulette spin, with the 1326 pp?
like a martingale. but instead, bet a third of the total losses+half the original bet and let it ride once to save shit tons of money.Martingale is just crazy expensive.
it is expensive, and why would you pay the casino at betting, i will never use martingale, i would rather not use any of my money to bet at all, this is why i use paroli
Life is a true gamble 🙏🙏
But if you don’t hit your full sequence you win 0 and still rack up losses. You should make a positive progession if you win and a negative progression if you lose. As long as you have a decent size bank roll and even odds you will be able to 0 out your losses
Thank you very much for the content. Keep up the good work! ;)
theironmanx428 Most welcome Buddy! If theres anything casino you'd like us to explain just let us know !
@theironmanx428 Cheers for this, I been tryin to find out about "is arbitrage betting legal?" for a while now, and I think this has helped. Ever heard of - Meyackentae Foundational Magic - (Have a quick look on google cant remember the place now )?
It is a smashing one off guide for discovering how to use this method to finally win at betting minus the headache. Ive heard some great things about it and my cousin got excellent success with it.
Winner of a video, I been tryin to find out about "betting strategies blackjack" for a while now, and I think this has helped. Have you ever come across - Meyackentae Foundational Magic - (do a google search )?
It is a good exclusive product for discovering how to use this method to finally win at betting without the headache. Ive heard some amazing things about it and my friend got excellent success with it.
isnt paroli just reversed martingale with a 3 win sequence?
Exactly. It's all about choosing your poison.
i don't get the reason why people stops at a 3 win sequence or using a Fibonacci sequence. i mean every bet is a mutually exclusive event and consecutive wins do happen to have low possibility but shouldnt be overlooked. but i do skip random games from time to time. the paroli system is just exponentially expensive for the casino it offsets any player bet especially they start at minimums and returns to a minimum once a loss happens
Ive been rocking the negative progression system and came up 5k in 5 days i bet big af after i lose so idk how this one will work and after i win a 500 doller bet i go back to table min am i doing it rigjt or na?
i bet u got cleaned by now lol
negative progression is nothing compared to the positive progression. especially when u know how to do bet sizing. i can do 250k easily with minimum bets which is only around 200 at the casino that i play at, get casino's expense to pay for the plays in the long run, which means having them to pay for me to play. with a negative progression you pay for everything
1 2 4 = 7 units $5 a unit = $35 risked only $5 winning $70 repeating till casino is Broke !
Now now. Don't break them. Remember, you can shear a sheep many times but you can only skin it once.
Its win 35 in the end.. IMO its really stupid to count also the wins which you are going to bet right away
100-5 bet
95+10 win
105-10 bet
95+20 win
115-20 bet
95+40 win
135
just curious why NONE of the videos for these "systems" actually use real money? Nope - ALWAYS play money/free money demo's....
I am pretty sure that a few years back I saw a video where guy was betting his own money showcasing this system, he was covering up his login name and stuff, but still might be fake.. On the other hand, when seeing someone making video on a martingale strategy and using his own money is like seeing an unicorn or real santa claus guaranteed :D
This won’t work unless your on a hot table.Probably not true but casinos probably had this video make in hopes of getting people to bet stupid
If that was true they would make a video saying to go for a martingale telling you have red or black doesnt come up more than a few times in a row, that would be a video made by a casino.. In this case they talk about positive system which is called positive for a reason, and if so that its really made by a casino after all then thats one nice casino who dont want you to lose in a matter of minutes but in a matter of hours or days, work either way :D
I tried this method for 1 hour (betting 0.5-1.0-1.5) and I have only won 2 euros... I dont recomend to use it
atleast you won, you cant expect to win big anyway when your initial bet is 0.5, i won once 700€ using this and lost 400€ on secound time i used it
hi guys, the best success that I have had was by following the Magic Matcher Tactic (just google it) definately the best remedy that I have ever followed.
+ 4 bets in 1 hour is good result
negative progression = gamblers mentality at all gambler's costs
positive progression = use casino money and costs to bet against their own, if used correctly with bet sizing strategy = all you can eat gambling the casino is paying you to play against themselves
I could never understand using a negative progression. It makes no sense.
Progressive bets or martingales work if the win percentage is greater than 50%. Duh. Otherwise it is a way to big losses. You need to play a game where you can get an advantage. But where? Wrong question. Not where, but with whom? Woof.
thank you for the content
Thanks. Clear.
See?! Now this makes sense. The Martingale System & others like it, Should be called the “Losers’ Chase System”.
But someday, when I feel flush or lucky, I’m going to play like my husband thinks Blackjack should be played. If the House has the edge, why not play like the House? And that includes hitting on Soft or even Hard 17s, regardless what the Dealer’s up card is. I’m old enough to remember when single decks to be a norm. Today you’re “lucky” if you find anything less than 6 decks.
Common sense should dictate, there are lots of small cards coming out, if you’ve seen lots of face cards. So why NOT hit a hard 17? I’d like to do this some time when dealers show high cards. Wanna bet I’d win? 😆
Without having to card count, and if we’re playing for FUN, using the standard systems we all know, can get boring. Of course I don’t play too get rich so I’m willing to lose as long as I’m having FUN!
There are many factors in sports picks. One resource I found that successfully combines these is the Magic Matcher Tactic (check it out on google) without a doubt the most useful system i've heard of.Look at all the incredible information .
AKA the Fibonacci Sequence...lol...
1.1.2.3.5.8.13.21...
its no where same dude
Thats my system I made myself, I didn't know some Italian patented it, lol
just tried this paroli system with free money and it fking sucks man biggest waste of cash ever just do the martingale on the 3 dozens it pays you 3 times 1 dollar so do 2 times on a dozen then increase with 1 unit so 2 dollar you make 6
This strategy is a disaster for red-black-red-black-red-black.... sequence.
I love how a channel clearly owned by a casino encourages players to use stupid strategies and says that martingale is "dangerous" lol
what?
Martingale is dangerous. I'm serious. I've tried it. My stamina for Martingale is an absolute. I started off with $1. I have 11 lives. I died. Do not use Martingale.
its actually the opposite of what you said. casinos would encourage gamblers to bet at their own costs.
hello
This is just superb, I have been researching "blackjack betting online" for a while now, and I think this has helped. Ever heard of - Ameliaten Bankify Bigshot - (search on google ) ? Ive heard some interesting things about it and my buddy got excellent results with it.
1+2+3=6 unit profit if you win 3 in a row. If not, you lose 1 unit every time you do not win 3 in a row.