What is an Answer to the Complaint?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 сен 2024
- What is an Answer to the Complaint. This video introduces the defendant's Answer in a federal court to the Complaint. For questions or comments, please visit my blog or feel free to send me an email and to post your comments below.
blog: www.uslawessent...
This was a clear presentation, thanks so much for posting!
thank you so much. this is very helpful. the visual is great and engaging to help understand the process of filing a response.
This is a great succinct video lesson. Very helpful.
These videos are amazing! Thanks so much!
+Christine Persaud Hey there! Thanks Christine.
Very user friendly video thanks for posting
Thanks, Tim. I appreciate it.
what if the answer is the famous "failure to state a claim" what is the proper rebuttal to that? would it be a memorandum? great video as customary...
Question, in the answer to the civil complaint does the plaintiff has to answer the questions raised in writing to the defense? Or does the defense have to ask for their proof through the court in a separate document? I received a date for mediation and was wondering if they had to get me their proof before mediation?
So is a complaint a claim or is it filed as a complaint?
The Complaint contains the plaintiff's claims against the defendant. It is a document where the plaintiff lists why the defendant is liable to him. You might find the link to my blog helpful. Let me know whether this answers your question.
uslawessentials.com/musical-interlude-complaint-answer-counterclaims/
My looking at it is that this is a common law land if I cause no man or woman harm injury or lost there complaint couldn't stand if I file a claim against a false complaint cause only a man or woman can file a claim but state officials lawyers and attorneys can only file complaints. Maybe I'm wrong just how it makes sense to me. I would file a claim toward that man or woman making a complaint not in there status as a official. Loved the video though!! Makes good sense.
Do you still have to submit an answer if you want to settle ?
I'm sorry I can't give you legal advice.
Why is an unanswered allegation considered an admission?
My opinion is that it provides efficiency and fairness. If the defendant could ignore an allegation plaintiff would have no way of knowing whether it is a disputed allegation or not. Requiring the defendant to admit or deny lets the parties know what they are arguing about and what facts are undisputed. They can save time and resources, focusing on what is at issue.
@@USLawEssentials Makes sense. Thanks! At least as long as both parties can agree to what the allegations are.
please note that this is amissunderstandig.regarding the shop.it is not that in Ernst Ludwig str.the shop where my sis asked to have me do an apology in the Dieburgerstasse where I many times had as my sister by always giving high amounts to the same person ,of money as thank you. but sometimes as I am learn it is compared long times to wait for both as coloured and cut as pay for wash as all.we both to the amusement of the others and on many occasions were letting us to wait .as it amused the others who worked there for the owner.to put it when I mentioned that as the outburst of mine I wanted to apologise and not let.instead impolite to my sis who done nothing and the impact not to go there at all. I think it's important for the team that they do not have to treat us not just for the money but too as a good paying customer for the best quality and the ability of the team. in that the team always been very inpolite +been as compared to Ernst Ludwig street and we not complained.AsParkinson not only affecting my way of muscle strength demise and affecting around me to be not polite and not positive
as not to mention contact controlling as we were robbed by People who were from the Balkans. well very bad over 60 I'll as no help ! and ladies who would have liked to sit around give comment.I was I'll never been so bad before.same day a letter saying that I had again not even be able to walk had to listen close enough for these groups of women who should not have been around there so I says it.not to mention the letter in a türkisch language that I would pay for 2 contracts at Ay Yildis a sisters company.of O2 both Telefonica no contracts ever seen ask Bank to take money from this back.police does wanted to see papers got not 1.so no help there.bùt at least 2 month of return of Bank.that the same number so easily does he used in Another city as then finally my doctor wrote a statement about Parkinson syndrome and me.so then I am now after months later I still got the confirmation that I have Parkinson severely.Yours Faithful KARIN .Thanks to the point of view. HÇ
Let's assume for a moment arguendo. That I'm driving a car without a license and receive a summary offence for my actions. I go to court and make use of multiple defenses. I will not give the full arguments here but will summarize. 1st I argue a defense of necessity and proximit cause lies not lie with me but with the goverment. 2nd I argue a freedom of movement argument showing that the right exist and that I have the right and then I define it using case law. 3rd I argue a liberty interest and that my interest outweighs the goverment interest unless the goverment can show I'm an Eminent threat to any one person. I then submit that MENS REA is the bed rock of criminal law. I argue that the prosecutions primary duty is to show that I commented this act with intent. I turn to bryars v United States where intent is defined as an evil or malicious motive or intent to avoid a know duty or task. I then argue that since I rely on the constitution and previous court decisions that I couldn't have done anything evil or malicious and therefore the prosecution is specifically precluded from performing there major task. I therefore motion to dismiss the case for lack of legal sufficiency and failure to show a cause for action. Now assume my argument is both persuasive and has merit. Can or should I win?
No to both questions.
@@USLawEssentials no to the second question.... experimenting with and defending the constitution is the most honorable act an American can do. So I'm not sure if your part of the governing class or the governed class. As the great Oliver Wendell Holmes once said: persuction for ones expression to him seems perfectly logical when that expression is posed to harness pull back and retain power from the opposing party namingly the goverment.
*you're not your btw. byars, not bryers. Relax. Thought you wanted my opinion. Here's a link to Byars v United States supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/273/28/ What did you want to say about it?