Decoding Putin and Xi's blueprint for a new world order | DW Analysis
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 апр 2024
- China and Russia are getting closer. Rather than distancing himself from Vladimir Putin over his war against Ukraine, Xi Jinping is doubling down on the relationship. And Putin is becoming more and more dependent on Xi as an economic, military and geopolitical lifeline. Why is this happening? What do Xi and Putin want to achieve? And what does their relationship mean for the rest of the world?
DW’s Richard Walker goes on a deep dive into the roots of the Moscow-Beijing relationship. Finding how the two sides are an economic “match made in heaven.” How China’s People Liberation Army wouldn’t be where it is today without military supplies from Russia when it was frozen out from other suppliers. And how the personal bond between Putin and Xi is feeding into a joint mission by the two men to reshape the world.
This relationship has potentially deep implications for every nation on earth. In part 3, we explore the impact in three areas currently underestimated by many: the prospect of joint China-Russia nuclear weapons planning, the impact on India of Russia becoming subordinate to China, and the implications for the endgame of the Ukraine war.
Featuring interviews with leading experts including Alexander Gabuev, Bonnie Glaser, Zhou Bo, Garima Mohan, Wang Huiyao and Decker Eveleth.
Chapters
0:00 Introduction
4:05 Military ties
7:15 Post Cold War
9:45 The Munich speech
12:20 Georgia & Ukraine
14:30 Xi comes to power
16:55 China’s 2049 goals
19:55 The Xi-Putin bond
23:25 Paranoia
26:41 BRICS
28:24 No alliance
30:31 China’s new nukes
33:38 Nuclear arms race?
38:15 India-China dispute
41:10 “Scary”
43:50 Russia spoiler
47:05 China-Ukraine
50:49 Nuclear threats
52:50 Scenarios
Subscribe: ruclips.net/user/deutsche...
For more news go to: www.dw.com/en/
Follow DW on social media:
►Facebook: / deutschewellenews
►Twitter: / dwnews
►Instagram: / dwnews
►Twitch: / dwnews_hangout
Für Videos in deutscher Sprache besuchen Sie: / dwdeutsch
#Russia #China #geopolitics
![Chance the Rapper - Buried Alive (2024) | [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8BjfkpgbAEY/mqdefault.jpg)
"Their militaries work together...Their economies work together...Their diplomats work together...." Well, I'm glad someone finally learned about the benefits of teamwork. 😂
Lol
Hope that America wakes up
And the autocratic leaders getting older each day. Succession is messy in authoritarian country's that's when democracy is superior
@@mauricekingston6682were still arguing there are more than two genders in America 😅
And the whole World sees how evil and warmongering the US is!
When you build like 500 military bases around somebody country, you would think they will just be sitting duck and let you do whatever?! 🤣
But US will always win, my reason is because here in the west we have better democracy. I don't care what tech China and Russia have, they can't defeat our democracy and we will win in any war with democracy, that's why the US has the best and accountable politicians as they are democratically elected & blessed by God.
Yes, Biden will just be sitting duck
exactly!
they said china walk together with russia, but they dont mention the reason, us and west made them. russia used to try to join nato, us need they play as a threat and enemy.😅
or their dogs won`t be so good at taking orders.
whenever the reporter uses the word "the world" I'm wondering how many countries is he referring to? Does the term includes your nation???
Vesteros
I am brown. So no I am not in their worldview. But Idc 😐
We are the Center piece of this whole Mess...We police the world and some have had enough
Well given the fact that what is known as the World Wars, World Cups, we're European Affairs. The Americans have a domestic sport competition named World Series, so it is clear what he means by World.😂
Trust me. You lile it or not, your country runs on Russian energy and Chinese manufactured things ;) let's begin with the thing you recently used to write yiur comment :)
If the United States says that it does not pose a threat to China and Russia, then look at how many military bases the United States has around Russia on the territory of NATO countries, which is getting closer to the border with Russia, including military bases, and how many military bases around China, and immediately look at the number of military bases of China and Russia, and that's it it will be clear that these are necessary measures.
but who will attack either China or Russia? Russia need a vassal not a partner, they disarmed Ukraine in 1992 with Lisbon treaty and by 2001 forced Ukraine to get rid of nuclear weaponry. So this is not power move by your understanding? While NATO expanded in the east Europe only in 2004. They were afraid of "brotherly country" even way before nato propositions or European Union. So stop this BS, yeah there are no saints in this world, but Russia, more exactly Putin, is master manipulator. Guy just doesn't want to be included into western economical circle and that's it. In capitalistic world, Russia could be very precious partner with its rich land, potential economy but his mentality is thuggish which gives him paranoia that he will be exposed as dictator. But he did even worse for his country, the guy will die eventually, but Russia will remain as not reliable partner in any regards while could've stayed gray cardinal by flirting with US and China for years and stimulating his economy at the same time. When you're incompetent leader - war is the answer.
Why are the host countries allowing the US bases? Nations like Germany, South Korea which house US bases are not conquered territory. They are there with the express permission and request of the host country. Those countries want the US military there exactly because it deters lunatics who head the governments of Russia and China.
The difference is we would not actively use those bases unless provoked
@@laurendelsignore330 shfup, did iraq, libya, syria provoke you?
China is a dictatorship that HAS IMPRISONED MILLIONS OF UGHYURS AND HAS COMMITTED HEINOUS ATROCITIES AGAINST ITS OWN PEOPLE!
SLAVES, CHILD SLAVE LABOR!!!.
TREATING ITS OWN CITIZENS WITH HORRENDOUS DISDAIN AND UNALIVING!
Where is YOUR RIGHTEOUS INDIGNATION against THOSE THINGS!!!!?
AMERICA DOESN'T IMPRISON ITS PEOPLE AND CHINA'S XI IS AN INSANE LUNATIC! HOW DARE YOU! IF NOT FOR AMERICAN PEOPLE WITH OUR STRENGTH FORTITUDE AND INVENTIVENESS THE REST OF THE WORLD WOULD DIE AND FREEDOM AS IT IS KNOWN WOULD CEASE TO EXIST!!
YOU live under a dictator if you want to fool, but American will NEVER CEASE BEING THE LEADER OF THE FREE WORLD AND I'LL BE DAMNED IF YOU WILL BAD MOUTH US! WITHOUT AMERICA YOUR COUNTRY AND THE ECONOMIC SUCCESS YOU SEE WOULD CEASE TO EXIST! YOU ARE INCAPABLE OF SUCCESS WITHOUT AMERICA!
So, when a character that DW thinks is justice appears, the picture becomes brighter and the music becomes brisk. Is this reporting news or making a movie?
Everything is content to feed your biases
Russian bot
@@Nathansss365 Biden bot
Y'all slow. Everyone knows the Irish control the world from the shadows.
It’s called cinematography or would you just prefer white noise in the background 😂😂😂
Just as during imperial times the same sort of people are still around. "We will always have kings, we just won't call them that". That is what napoleon said, calling out even his own position and sparing no one.
still imperial time in the western world. lead by UK manipulative
"Just as during imperial times" It is still the imperial times as the US still threaten, terrorize and dominate the world. Its coming to an end now though.
@@gregtriplex5878 The 1997 handover of Hong Kong was the end of the British Empire.
@@bcanuck is no longer about land or territory anymore. the game has change as we know it neo-colonialism. is about the valuable resource. every war and conflict in middle east, the mastermind of the narratives came from UK repeat by US as support tools with promise to share profit. without stolen UK cant be survive, they have nothing left in the country, so they must stolen from other country cover up by US protection
@@bcanuck exactly
If the US had ever been smarter (more realist) in its strategic foreign policies, it should never have driven Russia to the Chinese side. Politicians in the old days understood that the best scenario was to have a weakened and contained adversary, not a desperate country with military might and nothing else to lose. Great power competition is about reaching a balance that is advantageous to you, not a winner-takes-all situation that can never be achieved without great wars if possible at all.
Absolutely 💯
This was the worst stretch of foreign policy by the west by nuke miles. Russia requested twice to be part of a larger NATO security umbrella, leaving China the real competetor fo the USA marooned (one could then reason). Oh But nooo, they (US EU) decided to shun the Russian Federations endless calls to stop marching NATO to her borders. Listen nooo. USA doubled down, as the US can take both Russia and China Washinton said, leaving Russia no choice to find new trade partners in India Africa and of course China to escape the worst samctions deplyed in the history of mankind against a nation. This is a disater that even Henry Kisinger acknowledged was the to be avoided at all cost, forcing Russia into the arms of teh CCP Beijing. But thats me, I wish it all could be different.
It is a time relative situation. The longer western powers hesitate to pull the trigger the more difficult it will be to conclude a war conventionally. If we wait until China builds 3000 ICBM and a naval force double the size of ours we will be in a very difficult position on the Chess Board. In other words, avoiding war with China may not be an option. You just cannot go over there and ask them to please stop building so many tanks and drones. The situation forces our hand.
Affirmative😉
lol America did nothing to alienate Russia
Next time please find some more intense music…
Found a KGB agent
phew!! 😂🤣😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣
I can't believe we get these amazing documentaries for free on RUclips, DW stepping its game.
paid by German tax payers, managed by the state, and it's in english. they're serious
its a weak propganda piece. The narrator said the war is causing a lot of turmoil but is failing to remember who fuelled the war by sending hundreds of billions of dollars to Ukraine. Jefferey Sachs and Robert Mearsheimer said sending weapons to Ukraine would only prolong the war and not necessarily result in a Ukraine victory. This was before the first shots in this war were fired. We still remember who it was that said "Even if Zelensky is ready to negotiate, we are not".
The narrator should stop pretending to be worried about the "turmoil" the war is causing. He's not on the side of the real victims of the war.
@@wolfswinkel8906 Sure, let the invader get what he wants in the name of peace, I'm sure that will set a nice example.
@@GianJin I believe the "invader" tried to negotiate and was provoked instead. Stoltenberg himself admitted that increasing NATO divisions on the eastern flank in response to the peace agreement he sent to Brussels in December 2021, was a "mistake".
Anyway my point is, this narrator is just trying to frame his presentation in lieu of critical facts to offer nuance. And you're being mischievous by failing to remember that the Minsk Agreements leave donbass in Ukraine's hands. Your fear mongering is sticking out
@@wolfswinkel8906 And yet he invaded.
13:23 This is how the West frames it NOW. However, one seems to conveniently forget, that during the 60'ies, it was the West that drew a "red line" with Cuba wanting nuclear rockets in their bases. The West, the US on top, straight out did not want that and actually threatened with nuclear war, if the Russians would deliver those nukes. But... if "a sovereign country has the right to self-determination", then Cuba had the same right to decide that they wanted those rockets. However, this was unpalatable for the US and they would NOT stand for it, even if it meant war.
50 years later, and we say that Russia can't force their own will on another sovereign country, even not for security reasons... while we did *exactly* the same. Well then, if WE had the right to draw a "red line" that can't be crossed, even with a sovereign nation, than so can Russia and anyone else. The fact we now deny others that right that we give to ourselves, show how hypocritical we, the West, are.
If Ukraine has the right to decide it wants to be with NATO because it's a sovereign country, than so has Cuba the right to decide it wants nuclear rockets on its soil as a sovereign country. Period.
That's an absolutely appropriate comparison. Of course any historical comparison is always lacking, this is as close as it gets.
u are right bro
Cuba doesn’t need nuclear weapons. Who would they need to protect themselves from? We are not threatening Russia with our military placement. We have bases where we placed them because of these unhinged dictators. They are unpredictable and need to be kept in check.
are we putting nukes in Ukraine?do you no the difference between offensive and deffensive mesures?was Cuba a solvern nation with defense or ?
@t7ow7gz8d Huh? We've put them in virtually all NATO countries. And you DO know Ukraine was going to go for NATO membership, yes? You seem to be ill-educated, my friend, if you don't even know that the US put nukes in most of the EU countries that are within NATO... And yes, Cuba was and is a sovereign country as well, and the reason given was one of defense, just like the US and NATO gave as a reason.
So, in fact, you're basically corroborating everything I said.
lol, a bully never admits his bullying and always fear to lose its top dog status
America is the real bully boy. They have their finger in many pies.
Bro, sometimes it maybe has something to do with the humanitarian views the west holds, just imagine china would be the “top dog„ and just imagine what kind of world that would be?
@@What0Happend so you agree that killing innocent for political purpose is genocide and goes against human right? And usually dictatorship authoritarian government does that right?
Sounds like nato 😂
@@What0Happend what kind of humanitarian view does the west hold? Like the one that has happened in gaza is that their so called humanitarian view you talking about, it's over now for the USA they destroyed half of the world and you thinking that west has a humanitarian view, that's why people are disgraced everywhere
Never underestimate the power of two people
Its like Xi and Putin are a pair of villains from a Bond movie.
Revenge of Dr Xivil and Xinny Me.
American villain more like it they suckered Ukraine into this war with bs saying they would back them up 😂 but only sent money
@@BRUCE_the_MOOSE_не будь таки наивным - используй голову не только для еды! 😊
@@MilanzBulldog-pc6mw 80% of your cheap tanks and armoured vehicules are being destroyed by U.S. weapons. HIMARS, ATACMS, GLSBD, ABRAMS, JAVELINS, CLUSTER BOMBS, and almost 90% of your weak air force was destroyed by STINGERS AND PATRIOTS. You have another lie for me to debunk, Vladimir?
There is a sense of biasness in the documentary, it embraces the neoliberal western policies and shuns any indifference to the latter.
Of course, it is a Western documentary, its sole purpose ultimately is to manufacture consent for war against RUS/CHN
Yep they seem unable to help themselves.
Low quality journalism usually adheres to a political bias instead of objectivity
Nice try comrade Sergei
You cant write a documentary that goes against people who are paying your wages.
Brainwashed, come to Africa white boy@@Stepbacktrey
how i wish the narrator can also highlight the usa Obsession with its hegemonic global dominance both economically and in the military sphere, 😊😊
militarily only,, nothing on economy
🇺🇸 economy #1 in the 🌎 period.🎉🎉🎉
@@alapaticornell4391 Crumbling infrastructure and rising homelessness. No. 1
What's worse than anything is the hated you have in your comment. Why do you care so much about a place you resent? You defy your own ability for a creating a good net, instead you force your hate. It may be so they have issues, doesn't make them less the people they are.
Because the us doesn't rule with an iron fist and at least ppl in the us can go out with out there faces being scanned
I am not able to find any word about Minsk I agreement or Minsk II agreement, and who broke it
Anglo-saxons of course, their goals are to start global conflict. Specialy after when the american realising that they are losing the competition in nuclear power energy stations..
I was also curious about this I heard so much about it but haven't actually looked into it. I believe the territory to the east the Donbass that Russia took over now was supposed to get a chance to vote if they want to become part of Russia. But Russia agreed to never attack and to defend Ukraine from attack if they gave up their nukes... which was foolish of Ukraine.
The agreement was Ukraine would give up their Nukes to Russia, and would receive protection from Russia, UK, and US if ever attacked.
@@merlin6625 Yes as long as Ukraine did not threaten Russian national security... which it did.
@@merlin6625sorry your referring to the 1994 Budapest Accords.
I do not see what is wrong with countries like Russia and China working together. Why do people not question why USA and EU are working so close together ?
Exactly dude.They’re just paranoid about it
You will see India align themselves with both Russia and China (despite differences) to change the balance of power.
Not until China stops arming it's puddle at India's western border.
Ofcourse, like the three brothers living with shared borders
@@swayambhu4510seems unlikely. China will wage war against India.
@@swayambhu4510and North Korea as well
Does India really want to lose its democracy? That’s what will happen. Russia and China will buy up land ( for their Belt and Road Initiative) and lease to poor farmers who won’t be able to pay them back. More and more they will OWN India. You think they’ll allow freedom of religion?? Human rights?? Capitalism?? India better wake up. India always waffles between who they do and don’t support. Think about it.
Putin walks like he grew up in Compton CA in the 90s. He's got that gangsta lean and pop.
When he shakes, white knuckles his Napoleon table and slouches, is that him balling like a player.
@@assertivekarma1909 Putler is a little old man, he is a joke for the whole world😂🤣
I know perfectly what you say 😂 I used to live there in the 80's and 90's
He have kgb walk, dominant hand dont swing, its near gun for fast reaction
@@nenadmitrovic3469Except he was a pen pusher.....
The music is seriously annoying... totally over-the-top
Matthew 24:6
King James Version
6 And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet. - The Lord Jesus Christ.
theshepherdschapelchannelyt w Arnold and Dennis Murray...
I wonder who defines what democracy really is. The journalists think it is the West and us , i dont think so.
Biafra gave the world constitutional democracy called Nsibidi
Nice production. Can I ask where do you find the ominous background music for download?
I’m trying to become a RUclipsr and I heard music can be used to sway viewers opinions
😂
Fear fear fear😅
I think maybe some undertakers might be able to help you out.
😂 dude is wanting to become a youtuber and add music that sways people opinions. bro, come on 🤣🤣🤣
@@rustyslawTTV 🤭Didn’t you get the sarcasme?
Adding suspenseful music and interpreting their actions from Western bias does not take away from the fact that China feels threatened and provoked by the hundreds of US military bases encircling it as well as the weapons supplies to Taiwan and the US planes hovering near Chinese coasts. This is existential for China, just another war of opportunity for Uncle Sam
"Encircling" Yeah the famous US bases in China's neighbours Russia, Mongolia, North Korea, Vietnam, India...
@@noradrenalin8062 USA tried, as we seen in Vietnam and Korea. Yet, there are USA military bases in Japan, South Korea, Singapore. What bases Russians or Chinese have in USA neighboring countries?
@@josefknechtable China has bases in all countries friendly enough and trusting enough to China to allow Chinese bases on their territory. The same goes for the US. What does that tell you?
China is absolutely correct to feel threatened. However, the threat isn't the US. The threat is the abstract notion of Western style democracy.
Chinese citizen have the opportunity to observe Western style democracy at work throughout the world. It's obvious to anyone without a blindfold that on average people live better, at least from a material point of view, in Western style democracies, regardless if they're living in highly developed countries, like the US or South Korea, or emerging democracies, like the former communist countries in Eastern Europe or the Philippines. That material point of view is the most visible one, but there are also other things in Western style democracies that people notice, such as the rule of law and more respect for basic human rights.
China is an autocracy, and has been one for about five millennia. The overwhelming majority of China's population never had any contact with foreigners, and a large part of it lives in the countryside - China's industrial sector is powered by a rather small part of its population. The Chinese government also strictly controls what information its citizen can access. That causes the vast majority of Chinese to support the dictatorial government of China.
Nevertheless, knowledge about the world has a way to spread uncontrolled, despite the strongest efforts of some governments to stem its propagation. People in China getting the idea that they would be better off without the rule of the one party system is a huge threat to China's governing elite.
I their stupidity, Chinese leaders believe it's just a matter of worldwide political dominance, and think that becoming more powerful and more influential than the US on the international stage will prove to their citizen that China's autocratic political system is superior to Western style democracy. That's not going to happen, as long as people are still imprisoned illegally in China and while the standard of living there is still appallingly low compared to even new, emerging democracies elsewhere.
_That_ is what's threatening China. Only, China fails to understand it. You can't effectively fight something without understanding its true nature. Which is why China is bound to loose - but Chinese citizen are bound to win.
@@a0flj0I dont think Okinawa, Iraq or Syria are pleased with those bases
United by a common enemy
Well thought out video. Just one problem, the background music sometimes got so loud that it even drowned out the narrator
11:00 Was he lying at all? Hasn't the US been calling the shots for the last 30 years? And isn't today's situation the result of the US trying to retain it's dominant position at all costs?
russia started the war, as china is trying to provoke one in the indo-pacific. how is that a result of US trying to retain its dominant position at all costs? bots.
If the Countries have their own right to choose, there will be no Cuba missile crisis.
You’re correct. China should let south east Asia and the first island chain to choose its own path and China should just focus on it own internal concerns.
Same to Russia and china
The hyper-emotional intensity of the background soundtrack is really over the top …defeating the reason/logical narrative.
In the 3 months of this video. All the curtains from the monsters that reside in west has been uncovered. Humanity they claim 😅😅. They think history is forgotten.
…it is obvious that this video was prepared and narrated through the lens and ideas of a western media…India is quite aware that the Russian and Chinese alignment isn’t geared towards nor against it’s security…in my opinion India isn’t given credit for its advanced intelligence and capability to think rationally and strategically for itself…
China has territorial disputes with India, Russia is a big trade partner of India.
question why India is aligning on the axis instead of trying to pull the u.s. from china
A common enemy is the USA. Neither CH nor IN is interested in war.
You make a documentary based on the opposite opinion.
Their mission is to invade,bully and seize another states sovereign property,look at china one ex. they want to take all of china sea.
1950-1969, Soviet Union-China alliance against the US, in Korean War and Vietnam War
1971-1989, US-China relationship honeymoon, while Soviet Union losing blood economically in the arms race leading collapse
1990-2012, Chinas focus on economy maintaining close ties with the west as well as a good partnership with Russia
2012-2018, China wants to do business as usual while expanding its influence worldwide until trump starts trade war
2020-today, COVID and Ukraine war changed everything fundamentally, xi and Putin bound together
I loathe trump as much as anyone but to imply China suddenly changed from doing 'business as usual' (lol) to belligerent because of a trade war is ridiculous.
2035-20... the brics will start killing each other.
If the United States can unite with Russia to resist China, it will be much more difficult for China. But this possibility no longer exists. The United States cannot defeat China and Russia through war. Now that Western values have been lost, it is impossible for the West to disintegrate China and Russia within the two countries.
That selfish trade war and the way it was presented did play a part sadly
Sino -Soviet split started in about 1960. Mao didn't like Kruschchev's "revisionism" and de-nunciations of Stalin and wanted to be leader of world communism. By 1969 there was armed conflict on the border.
As usual, completely left out how America pushed both countries to become friends. Antagonizing each one separately and you're surprised how they got close.
@DeEmperor1🎯💯
Hold on, my country Bulgaria was not allowed to join the EU without a NATO membership which is highly unpopular eversince.
The world don't need anymore conflict. Hopefully we all can work together and come to a a peaceful solution to all of these.
西方政客不这么想，他们不停的在世界上制造冲突
Dream on son. Wont happen
Let’s be honest, this would never happen
tell that to sleepy Joe and his lgbtq troops
Agree
For anyone wondering the song that plays when putins munich speech starts is "The Stalker by Chris Gilcher & Primetime Tracks"
Europe ball shaking when those two shake hand
The Russians and Chinese bilateral relationships will bring the liberalization of trade internationally. A match made in heaven indeed.
This is by far my favorite documentary channel.
Nice use of dramatic narration and music to slant your audience's opinion. If it is true, why not use objectivity to let listeners come to their own conclusion?
Sheep raised on hollywood
dont get boggled down with the music, the choice is simple, is democracy against autocracy
Base info is correct, but the spin is a bit heavy in some places.
@@joseribeiro9564lol man you up for a rude awakening once you find out how the real world works. If that’s the case then why is there no more opposition in Ukraine anymore lol
As an American I support the notion of reeling in the empire. Allowing a multipolar world is our only path to peace. Bring the troops home. Make America a fortress that would be difficult to attack and move towards a peaceful global economy with Russia and China. My fear is that it’ll take a regime change in the United States for that to happen. The American ruling class have committed too many crimes throughout the world to humble themselves into retraction.
I agree just give our allies nukes and return to isolationism/Monroe doctrine.
Agree with you 100%. ❤
As an American? That's the first clue your not. This entire situation can be summed up with keeping Russia contained in its own border. Land expansion is the issue.
Regime change in USA, impossible things, because in USA have not American embassy🎉😂
@@billyray7067
We are not the police of the world, we can't even keep the Hispanics contained at our border what do you think gives us the right to police other countries borders when we can't *no* won't police our own?
It's interesting how this is pitched as a US versus Russia AND China in terms of the strategic/nuclear competition/threat, but there is essentially no mention of the Force de Frappe and the Brit's nukes - France and Britain of course being NATO members subject to article 5 with the US.
Don't forget Canada we have three tanks
Russians do not see anyone in between them and USA as a partner or foe but our or their slave nations.
lol@@Moses771
@@Moses771 The US doesn't need Canada's military to be up to par. The American's military is good enough to serve both countries. What Canada brings to the table is empty land, a whole lot of it. This gives the US a lot more options to attack from, the ability to evacuate its people up north if need be, much longer coastal line to dock its ships and subs, and also a strategic point of entry into Russia through Alaska or the north pole. China have over 1.4 billion people while Russia have 140 million. That's a billion more people than the US and Canada combined. That's a lot of people to take care of, feed, and defend during a war.
@@jcpenny3606американская армия достаточно хороша? Откуда такая информация? С кем то эта армия воевала кроме слабых стран куда вторгалась?
Nice music and tone! One question if Russia set up base in Cuba how would US respond?
we know what it would do... because it almost happened. the order to prepare nukes were given
I feel like the US’s desire for total dominance with itself at the helm caused this issue. When you isolate countries, especially strong, independent countries like Russia and China, they start to get their own ideas with themselves at the helm. The US should never have suppressed China and it shouldn’t have suppressed Russia. Now their anti-US rhetoric is so engrained into their way of governance that I don’t see how relations will change other than a total change in government, and we certainly cannot rely on Russia and China to change government anytime soon.
It’s also impossible for the US to improve relations with these countries even if these three desperately wanted to, because the US’s allies also have engrained into their governance anti-Eastern sentiment, and any form of attempts to come together will be seen as outright betrayal by Japan, Ukraine and Taiwan.
These countries will never be able to settle their differences, the only time they could was the 1960s.
When you feel neglected Don’t give up, you will be surprise there is always someone who can be your friend and see your strength and potential.❤
There is no such a friend in communist world, only self interest to stay in power. All leaders that are against he US are leaders that wants to stay in power. Putin (24 years) , Xi (11 yrs), Kim (12 yrs), Ali of Iran (30 yrs in power).
This comment is priceless
lol.. why are we getting the impression you are not taking your medication.... AGAIN
The sino-India relations may not be good but will not too bad for any serious conflict such as war. No benefit for both India and China to have a war at their border. For its border priority , China's major focus will be Taiwan/South China Sea direction.
As long as India gives away its land that China claims is theirs.
Yes, moreover natural barrier of Himalayas on their land border makes it very unlikely too.Because, Himalayas are the highest mountain ranges in the world and no army has ever crossed it till now, they indeed are great natural buffers as Mountain warfare is very costly and exhaustive to invade but very easy to defend. India and China don't share any sea border so naval confrontation is highly unlikely too. Both are nuclear powers too so there's also Mutually Assured Destruction in WMD war scenario.
Both China and India want to build a multipolar world
@@NOCOS. Indeed. The west wants to keep on the top of the wealth with China/India less developed, it is totally not acceptable . The so called Rule based order should be changed to be more suitable to China &India .
@@NOCOS. Russia will be mediator .
I like the first part of the video, two important men, we need that change soon. ;)
One of the best documentaries seen by me,, keep it up DW 👌
The multi-polar idea is the right one in my humble opinion. Any form of unipolar is a terrible idea for the world (remember when western powers were dominant with the whole colonialism atrocity). A chair needs at least 3 legs to hold stable, so a world where western power led by the US as the 1st leg, China-Russia as the 2nd leg, and India as the 3rd leg, counter balance each other would be the ideal situation for the world. But we shall see! Things will seem to last forever until they don't!
I hadn’t thought of it that way but I see your point. Quite frankly I think India will play a determining role in bringing all sides to a more peaceful resolution since it’s taken a neutral stance.
With those 2 countries?😂 Look at what their neighbors are doing most of them are "siding" on the other side. It's polar becoz they like to think of it that way. But most country clearly sided to the other side.
Multipolar means dominated by a group. Thanks, but the rest of the world doesn't want to be run by a few gangs. In your haste to ingratiate India into the bullies gang, you have left out the rest of the world.
The UN was set up as the first organisation where all countries have an equal vote. That is not multipolar. It is DEMOCRATIC, MULTILATERAL.
It was carefully set up so there were vetos as safety mechanisms, not so a few could make it do what they wanted. The countries voted onto the Security Council are supposed to make decisions in accordance with the Charter- Article 24.
It is open to the UNGA to pass a resolution that a veto is NOT in accordance with the principles of the Charter so is INVALID.
The colonizing powers were fighting each other the entire time, so I don't think it was a unipolar world from their viewpoint at the time. Only in hindsight, & from the viewpoint of the losers in those conquests.
@joshuapanis5162 Do you think the US neighbors (except Canada) feel something different? Its the natural course of things - any smaller country is terrified of a closest regional power and will look for any friends outside to try to be safe.
The other guys are the enemy if they don't have your interest in mind and in their plans. It's always the case.
Well, this is not about "I", it's about us. Us as humanity. As in human rights of each one of us. About the path humanity will take. So no, it's not about one opinion on what should or shouldnt be. This is for every single human beeing. Even those who dont care for politics or democracy.
@@NotUnymous: It's about reality. It is better to live as the world is not as we wish the world is. Humans are corrupt. Humanity is run by the strongest of us humans. Sometimes they are psychopaths and sometimes they are good Kings. It always changes. I understand your point, but the masses have little to say when it comes to their leaders. The leaders are on a mission all of their own.
@@NotUnymous You are too naive. The US govt and its oligarchs never care about democracy. They never care about democracy and humanity in central n south america, asia, middle east, africa. In fact, the US paved way for a dictator to take control of a country, belittling their democracy. That's what happen in indonesia, chile, brazil, ecuador, saudi arab etc in order to control those countries resources and political influence.
@@NotUnymousdo you think the west has humanity interest?
Basically the west is the enemy to the rest and US is the enemy of all.
Look at what those countries done, it's not too late to start learning some basic Chinese/Mandarin or Russian for future.
I couldn't help but chuckle when there was horror music playing in the backgroudn when they said that China was advocating at the UN for economic justice to be considered a human right.
24:24
Very interesting documentary. Thanks for that @dwnews 🌻. Wonder if the murky background sound was really necessary? Very strenuous 🤕
it's good to see this visually, though most people in Asia, especially in the east side, already knew this in heart 20years ago, long before the war started in Ukraine.
Funny fact is even Japan Asean South Korea and India all whom are western allies are also fine with Asia overtaking West
@@s9ka972 India is not ally of any
20 years ago, when Xi was a humble governor of a province?
@@s9ka972 Overtaking the west in 40 years maybe. There will be a war long before then. China and Russia want to take over the world and must be stopped. Russia is basically a neutered dog now. All bark no bite. Not that they had any bite before the war started. Just no one knew that until it did.
How you sweeten your narrative so as to make sure your intended effect clings on absorbing 🧽 the minds of your viewers is truly amazing. Oh the good old West!
Russia's mutual friendship & cooperation with China has solidified now. Both Super powers are making the right choices moving forward economically & strategically.
Did you call Russia a superpower? BAWAHAHAHAHA
Russia the super power, currently 12 economically Germany
Japan
India
United Kingdom
France
Italy
Brazil
Canada all have bigger economies
You get to be a superpower and you get to be a superpower!
The world needs to stop competing, get around the negotiating table, agree on their differences, and negotiate peace. If this doesn't happen, the future will be incredibly dangerous and unpredictable. It already is, now..
Walker says WTO was China's ticket to fast growth is not true at all. India was in the WTO 5 year before China, India grew at the famous Hindu rate. Most global south countries in WTO at same time as China have developed only a fraction of the China speed. So WTO may have been required but it guaranteed nothing.
India have democracy which literally means it cannot remove people for a project immediately. It takes time for anything in India but people's freedom is considered important as well
Exactly- the US loves erasing history - they pretend they alone gifted China w their success 😂u need to take one look at America today to know they can’t touch China & it’s got everything to do with priorities & ethics - America wants non stop wars conflicts interventionism militarism they case a financial crisis ever 4-7 years they have lost their minds now they think they beat Russia & China & all so they can … own the world 🌍 that’s how F’ing nuts the American people r
We need a major shift or we headed to a dark future thx to the delusional cruel world dictator (US)
@@s9ka972 i don't think it was because of democracy but rather bureaucratic red tapes.
what is your point? Of course, WTO was China's ticket to fast growth. China enjoyed the full benefits of joining wto without fulfilling its promise/responsiblity, that is what differentiate it from all other countries that are in WTO.
@@kidsharon5573 what promise did China make it didn't deliver ? Where is the WTO case about this ?
0:32: 🌍 China and Russia are working together to drive significant changes in the world.
6:00: 🇨🇳 The Chinese military grew strong with their own efforts and some assistance from Russia, but their relationship improved when both countries decided to focus on other matters.
11:37: 🔒 Putin criticizes the enlargement of NATO and expresses concern over American power.
16:54: 🌍 China's ambition to become the number one global superpower by 2049 is seen as a threat by the US, leading to a trade war, tech bans, and efforts to coordinate with allies in Asia and beyond.
22:33: 🌍 The relationship between China and Russia is driven by their shared obsession with American power, but it also highlights the conflict between autocracies and democracies.
28:22: 🌍 The global economy is destabilized due to resources being spent on European security, causing alienation between Europe and China.
32:51: 💣 China is rapidly expanding its missile silos, enhancing its nuclear forces for a possible war with the United States.
37:37: 🌍 The video discusses the concerns of the US, India, and other major powers about the growing closeness between Russia and China, and the potential instability it may cause.
42:56: 🌍 India is concerned about Russia's closer coordination with China in multilateral formats and the potential consequences if Russia withdraws support in a border conflict with China.
53:50: 🌍 The endgame in the Russia-Ukraine war is a test of wills and resilience for Russia, China, Ukraine, and the collective West.
Recap by Tammy AI
Ok Emperor 🙄
The "Multilateral World Order" is simply just a rehash of the "Holy Alliance" of which Russia and Germany were party to back in the 19th century. Move along now people, nothing to see here.
But US will always win, my reason is because here in the west we have better democracy. I don't care what tech China and Russia have, they can't defeat our democracy and we will win in any war with democracy, that's why the US has th me best and accountable leaders as they are democratically elected & blessed by God
Who ever that woman is, i disagree that this partnership is solely about weakening the US. More likely for China to counter the US first decoupling then a softened derisking taxtic.
23.55 the main point of this Russia Chinese friendship already spoken in 23.55. Either way, both friendship share the same concern, concern that US will do something to topple the government, as they always did for other countries.
Geography is destiny, no one can choose.
Matthew 24:6
King James Version
6 And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet. - The Lord Jesus Christ.
theshepherdschapelchannelyt w Arnold and Dennis Murray...
There is more to this than any realize.These are dangerous times and must be paid attention to.Alit of uncertainty yes, but if it keeps on this direction,it can get worse to what nightmares are made of.
Do you think America would allow a military alliance between Cuba and China in a defensive alliance? America doesn't allow any other great power in two subcontinents(Manroe doctrine). They were not permitted to exercise their right to sovereignty. Cuba still faces sanctions because it dared to do it 7 decades ago. Actually, adding sinister music is not enough to prove your point.
Doesn’t India have their own problems with China, they should think about? 😡👎🏼
Cuba faces sanctions because they hosted nuclear missiles pointed at the US during the Cold War
No
If their right to sovereignty extends to forming a military alliance with the US' most dangerous rival whilst possessing a geography that can destroy the entire Mississippi River Basin by threatening the Strait of Florida & Yucatan Channel, then the US will very kindly put an end to the island's sovereignty.
People always forgot that or predent to ignore the inhuman the Cuban people are going through.
Hope people realize war directly between super powers would be the end of the world
everybody knows this
putin and xi look really cool together.
According to the type of music I should feel scared now
How the US sanctions on this two countries puts them together and makes them more stronger.
Bullies always get slapped down, and the US just self slapped 😊.
They are not fiends, sanction one China bank helping evade sanctions to ruzzia the rest will think twice
And domino will follow
its realization coming home now.
It was one sanction too many, and the bubble burst.
When certain countries economies are in difficulty it cause issues for other countries to distract the population.
US and EU economy might be stagnant but should bounce back. Germany will bounce back from their recession in a few years, well maybe when they get a new government.
Russia's economy is not that bad pre-war.
@@trogdortpennypacker6160 the US stagnant? Who told you that the Republicans? The US economy is the best it's ever been. Biden fixed the mess Trump made
@@alloutofbubblegum7271Italy has one of the highest debt-to-GDP ratios in the world, estimated at 147.2%
Russia Government debt accounted for 16.1 % of the country's Nominal GDP in Jun 202 3
@@alloutofbubblegum7271 Italy’s spending is a particular problem because of its slow growth, which this year is expected to be below 1%, and its vast debt burden-net public debt in 2022 was 144% of gdp. If it runs too wide a deficit, or faces too high an interest rate, the debt will become unmanageable. Now it is in danger of both.
Investors are well attuned to these risks, which is why they extract a premium for lending to Italy, compared with lending to Germany
Ukrain for Russia is the same, that Ireland for GB, or Canada for US.
23:10 ....established democracies? You mean the US- and EU "democracies" where free speech is condemned????
Most of the people in EU countries are aware that they’ve become serfs to US interests (can’t even write exactly what i want because my comment will get auto deleted by youtube. I’ll just say pax americana)
The term "the world" in this video basically means the western world.
Basically this Documentary is Just Based on Western Media Perspective and Thoughts. DW is one of these Many Dogs as well as BBC, CNN, Skyfox, CNBC, etc....m
FACTS
And?
You're on the Internet created by the West.
Probably on a smartphone invented by the West.
Commenting on RUclips, made by the West.
😂😂
@@SeraphimBarca The mobile phone was invented by the Soviets 💀
@SeraphimBarca Also, you miss the point: it isn't "the world" thinking Putin or Xi are villains, only the West. The other 6.5 billion people in the world either are neutral or actively support them.
36:20 you should informed your audience who pulled out first or violated the arms control treaty. Don’t be scared
Many times have been biased in past
This is the most "philosophic"documentory video that I have ever watched.
So, when these two men are gone does the threat disappear for freedom and peace-loving peoples? No one lives forever. Would love to hear some knowledgeable people discuss this further!
No because US hegemony is not peaceful at all its essentially the words most powerful military run by its owne military corporations who have all those politicians either on their payroll or on their board of directors.
To the global south populations who have been maintained under the boot of oppression, looting, exploitation, racism, colonialism, slavery, and poverty for the last 7 centuries this is 1st time there is a perceived hope of true liberation and these 2 exceptional leaders are leading the charge. May God protect them.
You’re delusional
Fascist putlerbot 🤮👎🏼
Tell them the NONSENSES western democracies and wicked colonial masters that stole everyday from the colonies .. .. .. .. .. ! .
When China and Russia talk about a multipolar world they mean themselves. They're not thinking of you, they want their "spheres of influence" back and that's it. If you oppose "oppression, looting, exploitation, racism, colonialism, slavery, and poverty" and still support Russia and their war on the people of Ukraine, then you must have either no clue or no principles.
@@internetidentity3917we don't care 😅
These old men think it's the 20th century still.
Not sure why other leaderships aren't doing anything...
I'm Totally About Maintaining of Countries Sharing the Beauty and Mysteries of Their Cultures 😊
Part 3: It should be clear that when Western propagandists say world they mean Europe and North America excluding Mexico.
and Africa , south Asia .
Why would you exclude Mexico? They are the #2 trading partner with the US, over China.
@@franksu9735Africa and Asia hate the West, they have been abused by them for decades. Only a few compradore dictators who are puppets for the West still like them.
@@fruitingfungiPragmatism. In reality Mexico is sick of the West. President AMLO has been trying to be as assertive as he can be without being outright assassinated. And yet at this very moment the US is arming and stirring up the cartel, preparing a casus belli for "military intervention" in Mexico. Mexico is much friendlier with RUS/CHN, as is the majority of Latin America. It's hard though, they are in the shadow of the beast.
@@fruitingfungi Mexico's famous quote about the US. 'We are too far away from god and too close to the US'
If India aligns with the West, it is a guarantee that they'll get balkanized. They are playing both sides for now and created a strong national sentiment (following China and Russia's lead) to prevent any balkanization for the time being.
lol what
I am all in for working with Russia, for china its tough with all the border issues we currently have. But i also wonder what can india and china do if they work together, two of the oldest civilization and two most populous country in the world. Their influence will be paramount over other powers.
Why would India ally with West ??? India is a non-aligned country. Balkanization of India isn't possible now , as India has grown into a civilisational nation now and linguistic divisions have got diluted in religious divisions.Lol😂
2 national parties competing in national elections means they have got their cadres and workers working together in whole India
wth
@@yam2050 Work together? I think fighting each other is more on the cards.
Really well made documentary👍🏻 Thanks for DW documentary team from South Korea ❤🙏🏻(559th Good button👍🏻)
The ominous, suspenseful music makes this video confusing
Mmmmmmmmm,the old adage keep your friends close but your enemies closer ? Wonder
After watching this you easily agree with China and Russia. America and west would do exactly the same thing China and Russia is doing. America and the west are obsessed with power. And there's nothing wrong with that as there is nothing with China and Russia ambitions
Peaceful coexistence (Russian: Мирное сосуществование, romanized: Mirnoye sosushchestvovaniye) was a theory, developed and applied by the Soviet Union at various points during the Cold War in the context of primarily Marxist-Leninist foreign policy and adopted by Soviet-allied socialist states, according to which the Socialist Bloc could peacefully coexist with the capitalist bloc (i.e., U.S.-allied states). This was in contrast to the antagonistic contradiction principle that socialism and capitalism could never coexist in peace. The Soviet Union applied it to relations between the western world, particularly NATO countries, and nations of the Warsaw Pact.
Debates over differing interpretations of peaceful coexistence were one aspect of the Sino-Soviet split in the 1950s and 1960s. During the 1970s, the People's Republic of China under the leadership of its founder, Mao Zedong, argued that a belligerent attitude should be maintained towards capitalist countries, and so initially rejected the peaceful coexistence theory as essentially Marxist revisionism. Their decision in 1972 to establish a trade relationship with the United States also saw China cautiously adopting a version of the theory to relations between itself and non-socialist countries. From that point through the early 1980s and the adoption of Socialism with Chinese characteristics, China increasingly extended its own peaceful coexistence concept to include all nations. Albanian ruler Enver Hoxha (at one time, China's only true ally) also denounced this and turned against China as a result of the latter's growing ties to the West, as exemplified by Richard Nixon's visit to China in 1972; today, Hoxhaist parties continue to denounce the concept of peaceful coexistence.
Peaceful coexistence, in extending itself to all countries and social movements tied to the USSR's interpretation of communism, quickly became modus operandi for many individual communist parties as well, encouraging quite a few, especially those in the developed world, to give up their long-term goal of amassing support for an armed, insurrectionist communist revolution in exchange for more active participation in electoral politics.
WW3 is not going to be fun tho..
@@mezjean5966 Sure you're right.
I understand your points, but I don't agree with what you're getting at. China and Russia's ambitions are NOT the same as the US. Sure, every country wants power, but China and Russia is developing countries and stopping colonialism in its tracks, whereas America and its lackeys are the perpetrators of colonialism
@@mezjean5966 That's on America to avoid. It's the only country that truly wants massive war in Asia or Eurasia. This will stop the Asian century and buy America time
Very unexpectedly deep documentary. I regularly watch DW but this is much better than most of what they produce.
Search for DW documentary, they have a another channel for docs.
Usually it's just excuses about why NATO can't ship military equipment to Ukraine, or why we're all slowly sliding closer to Fascism (again)...
Just pure biased .. and a lot of unreal .
Calling Xi aka China has global dominance and human rights etc are pure nonsense.
This is what the collect West wants to world to believe the nonsense.
China is an angel to the world if you do not know. Yes, you guys will never read a single report that is good done by China ... not one in the entire Europe and USA.
Enjoy your brainwashing sessions
Is this an attempt of DW to change the perspective?
Bonnie Glaser's concept of Human Rights is selective. If the violation is committed by Russia or China it is to be condemned, but if committed by the West as in Iraq, and others in the middle east, then its okay. Bush, Cheney, Blair and co are still free despite the lies their told that resulted in the deaths and suffering of millions. International law applies to all, otherwise none at all.
Bonnie Glaser looks and most of all sounds just like Caroline Reynolds in Prison Break :D
a country with 800 military bases feeling threathened😂
Russia might be fighting its neighbours(which they had history and land together) for land disputes but atleast it donsen't cross seas and mountains to destroy non-threat iraq,libya,afghanistan,syria, vietnam,palastine. Like west ,united snakes and NATO has done.
@@ALLAHISENOUGHFORPALASTINE Actually Russia went to Afghan first. May want to check your history.
@rockyjohnson9243 perhaps you need a history lesson too. It wasn't russia, it was the soviet comprising of many countries
@@rockyjohnson9243They being invited, my friend.
@@stephenamoh6439Lol, yeah sure. Let's pretend the Soviet Union was not just another Russian empire.
This is important. I hope people are paying attention.
Excellent documentary, but the CLICKING between scene switch drove me mad, I eventually, muted and read the subtitles. Take note for future articles. Ruined my enjoyment of this article.
Unidentified Aerial Phenomena is clearly visable at 4:51/56:36 in this video, it is a light blue disk, probably the object is silver and reflects the blue light of the sky on it. It flies above the airplane on the right of the screen and moves at very high speed to the left
I think we all should give a great shout-out to all the Western leaders who did everything they could in the last 20 years to make the Sino-Russian alliance a reality.
LOL Russia's dropping its pants and giving handjobs to Kim Jong Un for slingshots, and China has the same GDP as Mexico.
Nothing in the $23 trillion west is losing any sleep. Vape weapons.
Yeah, they cornered those two into a an alliance.
Warmongers will make all decent people band together
But US will always win, my reason is because here in the west we have better democracy. I don't care what tech China and Russia have, they can't defeat our democracy and we will win in any war with democracy, that's why the US has the best and accountable politicians as they are democratically elected & blessed by God
@@LoboalphaMASTERNeed to include Iran in the equation too.
The top priority of China is still its economic growth , for better living standard of its people.
But it is more difficult today than 20 years ago, when the rules of world are defined and more beneficial to the west , and no need to mention the sanction or barriers US/its allies put to slow down the development of China.
Russia is one of the close partners of China, as it helps have a secure backyard in the north border and reliable enery supply source. At the same time, China has been expanding its partnership in middle east, Africa , South America , South East Asia in full scale. Indeed it is a turning point for the world.
China has benefited from the most lopsided trade relationship possibly in world history. The West welcomed in Chinese goods with the most bare minimum of tariffs, very often no tariffs at all, while China demanded any foreign companies wanting to sell to their market do the following, 1: set up a chinese partner company to share ownership of a joint venture inside China, 2: share all intellectual property & technology with the partner company, 3: not use their own branding, but the branding of the partner company, 4: aggressively devalue their currency, 5: keep large sections of the economy completely off-limits to trade (e.g. financial services is one of the things Western economies are best at, China bans foreign trade in those services).
The fact that we actually agreed to this nonsense, and that it had continued for decades (and still does in Europe) is utterly remarkable.
@@Cotswolds1913 You listed a few points which require a long article for discussion.
But the context 30 years ago was that EU GDP per capita was 15 times vs China. The policies China put 30 years ago were quite reasonable as a full open market in 90s was impossible. Today it is quite different for example Tesla set up its own entity in China for EVs(not jointed venture). Similar for financial services . Good to understand better about China today, instead of stick to some common west media narratives.
One obvious mistake in your points : the #3, Germany car brands instead of "partner company brand) are very strong in China Volkswagen BMW, Audi ,Mercedes-benz as they are still the best car producers in China. Volkswagen is top sales of 3.18 millions cars in China in 2022. The local brand BYD may take Volkswagen top sales position in 2023.
@@xgguo3531 Volkswagen were the first car company to start a joint venture in China, the Shanghai Volkswagen Automotive Co., or SAIC Motor, which owned 50% of the venture, and Volkswagen itself 40%. This is precisely how China has developed such a strong electric vehicle industry, because it had been freely sucking up all of Germany's automotive technology, which it was unable to successfully apply to gas-powered cars (at least in a way which would be competitive within Western countries), but which was realized that EVs would be more of a fresh starting point for everyone, so easier to rush to that industry with more success.
To my knowledge Tesla is the only automotive company with a fully owned venture in the country, but even if there were more exceptions, by and large the rule is as I said, and any future exceptions to it do not erase the fact that nearly every western company in China has gone through this process, to China's absolutely enormous benefit.
@@xgguo3531 And on your point about the timing, the WTO actually made China promise (in written declaration), understanding the rules of the organization as they are, that it would reform it's confiscatory trade practices before it was allowed to join the organization and enjoy the low tariffs of WTO. China never followed through on those commitments, it just continued to take advantage of us.
The real reason for future growth to be more difficult than in the past is not global (or american) competition, but rather the success of the past makes it harder. When at a very low level, only a small growth is a huge advance. Moving from 2 to 3 is 50% growth; moving from 30 to 33 is only 10%, but still an increment of 3. The more successful china (or anyone) is, then the slower future growth is likely to be.
Ya know, this seemingly inevitable global conflict being lead between the US and China probably couldve been avoided. If, when China started opening up to global capitalism, the US would have went out of its way to not just become economic partners but to become allies. That wouldve created a sort of global hegemony of power sharing between the two nations. And above all, peace and prosperity for the human species. You might think that couldnt be possible because of Chinas authoritarianism conflicts too much with western ideals of democracy. But it is possible. Not only is it possible (considering the US is allies with other authoritarian regimes such as Saudi Arabia) but such a friendship could've possibly, eventually, grown to influence China into becoming more democratic overtime as well. Instead, the US runs off fear. Fear of competition. Fear that they cant have it all. Its reactionary and will lead to the death of us all. Because as the US becomes more wary and defensive, China reacts to such postures in kind. Its all so foolish.
The friendship between china and Russia is based on mutual respects in contrast to some countries in the world that think they are exceptional.
Dictators love each other and will back each other up.
They don't respect each other at all.
@@marksmallhorn7298 China respects Russia? You might check you history on that.
ya they hate democracy and are both dictatorships
Russia and China have common roots and they are neighbors. It makes sense for them to partner with each other.
China, Russia, Brazil, and South Africa are together, India is dubious in this game because it is sailing in two boats.
Remember this is one side of the story. Take it with a pinch of salt.
Russia's actions in Ukraine made EU/NATO relationship strong while US actions against China and Russia makes Russia/China relationship stronger.
I wouldnt call the EU strong at all right now. They're being ousted from Africa and losing the Global South rapidly. Demographic issues in the EU are also leading to fascistic governments throughout the region.
The US is right behind that..if Trump makes it back in the W.H
Exactly what actions against China do you think the US is taking?
@@cuddycabinrestorationproje9155 The US is circling China around Taiwan, the sanctions on semi conductors, the US is blasting China all day long.
@@Yasmin-dx3ek Depends which EU countries you're talking about? 🤔 Ireland 🇮🇪, my country is as corrupt as it ever was, being ruled by USUK and the unholy roman empire. And the North still occupied by the English warmongers who refuse to leave. France 🇫🇷 is the culprit who was robbing the Africans and refusing to get out, the cheek of them!
But with Russias 🇷🇺 help they've managed to remove them so they're in trouble because of that. Germany 🇩🇪 has bern occupied by US since the war but thats their stupidy not to get them out. Spain 🇪🇸 also has a hugh gang of them there. Otherwise we're all well 😂
If You attack two players at the same time, they ally themselves against You. That's game theory 101
Great video, good analysis! But if you want to paint a picture, paint an unbiased complete picture!
The new nuclear weapons delivery system arms race will probably get really costly and at some point new treaties will just make sense. Until then many governments will be spending money that they’d ideally be spending elsewhere.
But US will always win, my reason is because here in the west we have better democracy. I don't care what tech China and Russia have, they can't defeat our democracy and we will win in any war with democracy, that's why the US has the best and accountable politicians as they are democratically elected & blessed by God
Great upload! Thanks from Australia! ❤
India should really consider joining ASEAN. Given the strategic concerns of a resurgent Russian and Chinese threat too global stability, it might also behoove AUKUS to offer membership to India and Vietnam. Western tech with their productive capacities? Being able to scale up our Navies, share knowledge, and helping build an economic and military partnership as counterweight to China, might be in our shared interests.
It is already in the aforementioned interests. India is an ally if USA, so is most all of Europe, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, and many others. Collectively, we are far far more powerful than China and Russia......don't be foolish.
Don't you hate it when your only alliance is a dangerous 'situationship?'
Maybe it's not easy being Rus.