Hi, very useful and easy to follow tutorial. However I've got to say that t I find the example a bit unfortunate. I cannot get on with the idea of wife being an element of husband as it is his age or his name. In most of the democratic countries the wife doesn't belong to his husband. I know it's only an example but it really shows the still stick in the past mentality. My suggestion for a better, more democratic and fair example would be something like: ( insert here name, age, whatever elements of that person..) (insert here name, age, whatever elements of that person..) If we want real equality we have to change these little things too. Thanks for the tutorial :)
Well if we are to nitpick... Why is the wife element below the husband element as if women are below men? Why are you defining the members of a marriage by binary terms? (husband or wife) as if same-sex marriage does not exist? why does the marriage contain only two elements with no respect for cultures with polygamy? What about people of a certain sex who identify with a different role than the one you assigned to them? (i.e a male who is married to a man and a woman and identifies himself as a wife)? What about people who decide to marry themselves? I find your comment offensive as it contains clear elements of racism, homophobia, and patriarchy and does not include minorities and alternative lifestyles.
People.... A husband 'HAS A' wife...Period. There is a "HAS A" Relationship. It is common sense that a husband doesn't own a wife or that a wife is beneath the husband. Sigh...(Feeling annoyed). Listen to what he says when he creates the DTD document. Listen Carefully. He says: "...should only have one wife" (When he creates the second line within the DTD. At the end).
Even after 11 years, this video still continues to help many people
Thanks dude, 10 years and still helping
real man fr
Simply directly explained, good job!
real
Thanks dude very simple and very easy tutorial
"It's XML, it's complicated enough!"
Probs why I'm still not married.
@@MlleJulliette watching in 2018
Lamao😂
These toturials are so nostagilic...
You are the best there"s🙌
What is the difference if you write or put the asterisk inside the parens e.g. (husband*) ?
Wonderful ! beautifully explained sir...thank you.
Thank you very much. You help me a lot!.
very good example and explanation
Excellent!
Thank you!
Thank you so much!
Well explained! Tysm
hello, i am a timetraveler from 2008 and your video looks shit.
but it helped me a lot :)
Thx
Helped out alot, thanks very much :)
guess what, in Poland we are still learning this language at university👍
O ty też? U nas politechnice gdańskiej też trzeba się uczyć tego gówna
I know I'm like, 8 years and two days late, but why are "name" and "wname" two different things?
poor matt has to stay home and look after his kids while his wife Annie has to do all the work.
thank you kind sir!
Hi, One of the things I did not understand is why we are entering *. please let me know
He says in the video at about 1:00, the asterisk lets the xml document being validated have 0 OR more of the specified element.
Hi, ..
Don't we need to create any element for wife's age element in DTD?
Thanks!
Sir ye aap ke computer par kaun sa app hai
Still usefull 8 yo later, ty
When you omit the asterisk, can there be AT MOST one of each specified element or does there HAVE to be one of each specified element?
also yur name's dope
Elias Turnpike
If you see windows xp and notedpad, that means its legit!
Hi, very useful and easy to follow tutorial. However I've got to say that t I find the example a bit unfortunate. I cannot get on with the idea of wife being an element of husband as it is his age or his name. In most of the democratic countries the wife doesn't belong to his husband. I know it's only an example but it really shows the still stick in the past mentality. My suggestion for a better, more democratic and fair example would be something like:
( insert here name, age, whatever elements of that person..)
(insert here name, age, whatever elements of that person..)
If we want real equality we have to change these little things too. Thanks for the tutorial :)
llanosflats ss
Well if we are to nitpick... Why is the wife element below the husband element as if women are below men? Why are you defining the members of a marriage by binary terms? (husband or wife) as if same-sex marriage does not exist? why does the marriage contain only two elements with no respect for cultures with polygamy? What about people of a certain sex who identify with a different role than the one you assigned to them? (i.e a male who is married to a man and a woman and identifies himself as a wife)? What about people who decide to marry themselves?
I find your comment offensive as it contains clear elements of racism, homophobia, and patriarchy and does not include minorities and alternative lifestyles.
People.... A husband 'HAS A' wife...Period. There is a "HAS A" Relationship. It is common sense that a husband doesn't own a wife or that a wife is beneath the husband. Sigh...(Feeling annoyed). Listen to what he says when he creates the DTD document. Listen Carefully. He says: "...should only have one wife" (When he creates the second line within the DTD. At the end).
@@cyberlord64 Ahaha omfg, gold answer!!!!!
@@cyberlord64 Thanks, that response was needed. These virtue signaling busy bodies don't realize how toxic they really are.
U didnt run
xsff
chup